about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,258 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and the second variable is Patents granted in the US.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more goals were scored, the players' subconscious creativity rubbed off on them, leading to a surge in innovative ideas. This phenomenon, known as the "patent kick," sparked a wave of soccer-inspired inventions, from goal-line technology for better accuracy to turf designs for enhanced performance. It seems the players weren't just making goals on the field, but also scoring big in the world of intellectual property!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic soccer field with a European player scoring a goal, executing an extraordinary celebration that captivates the other players and fans. Set the scene with high-tech equipment and a sleek, modern design that exudes a futuristic atmosphere. In another image, depict the patent examiners reviewing and approving patent applications in the US, showing their inspired creativity stemming from the post-goal moves witnessed on the soccer field. Capture the transition from the electrifying celebration to the patent examiners' environment, juxtaposing the dynamic energy of the sporting event with the cerebral atmosphere of the patent office. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because as European soccer players score more goals, they unlock new innovative goal celebrations, inspiring patent examiners to grant more patents in the US to protect these groundbreaking post-goal moves.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Concept art Cute cartoon 3D Pixar Style Futuristic
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Because as European soccer players score more goals, they unlock new innovative goal celebrations, inspiring patent examiners to grant more patents in the US to protect these groundbreaking post-goal moves.
ChatGPT: Imagine a soccer field with a European player scoring a goal, and as they do, they perform an elaborate and creative celebration, inspiring other players and fans. In another scene, picture patent examiners reviewing and approving patent applications in the US, as they are inspired by the creativity shown in these goal celebrations, leading to an increase in the number of patents granted for new post-goal moves.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a soccer field with a European player scoring a goal, and as they do, they perform an elaborate and creative celebration, inspiring other players and fans. In another scene, picture patent examiners reviewing and approving patent applications in the US, as they are inspired by the creativity shown in these goal celebrations, leading to an increase in the number of patents granted for new post-goal moves. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic soccer field with a European player scoring a goal, executing an extraordinary celebration that captivates the other players and fans. Set the scene with high-tech equipment and a sleek, modern design that exudes a futuristic atmosphere. In another image, depict the patent examiners reviewing and approving patent applications in the US, showing their inspired creativity stemming from the post-goal moves witnessed on the soccer field. Capture the transition from the electrifying celebration to the patent examiners' environment, juxtaposing the dynamic energy of the sporting event with the cerebral atmosphere of the patent office.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count caused Patents granted in the US to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Netting Innovations: The Link Between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and US Patents Granted

The Journal of Sport Innovation and Intellectual Property

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from My Foot Ball Facts and USPTO to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 and p < 0.01 for 1975 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Netting Innovations: The Link Between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and US Patents Granted

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and patents granted in the United States. Using data drawn from My Foot Ball Facts and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we analyze the goal-scoring performance of top scorers and the number of patents granted from 1975 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study offers intriguing insights into the potential influence of European football's top goal scorers on innovation and creativity in the American patent landscape, shedding light on the unanticipated interplay between sports and technological advancement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Netting Innovations: The Link Between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and US Patents Granted

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and patents granted in the United States. Using data drawn from My Foot Ball Facts and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we analyze the goal-scoring performance of top scorers and the number of patents granted from 1975 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study offers intriguing insights into the potential influence of European football's top goal scorers on innovation and creativity in the American patent landscape, shedding light on the unanticipated interplay between sports and technological advancement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In recent years, the relationship between sports and various aspects of society has become an intriguing area of study. While it is well-established that sports can have a significant impact on cultural, social, and economic dynamics, the potential influence of athletic performance on technological innovation has been relatively understudied. In this study, we venture into the uncharted territory of exploring the connection between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. By delving into these seemingly disparate realms, we aim to unveil any hidden patterns or correlations that may exist between the prowess of European football's top goal scorers and the inventive output in the American patent landscape.

The blend of football and patent statistics may seem as incongruous as a physicist trying to score a goal in a Champions League final, yet the data-driven exploration of this nexus holds the promise of unearthing unexpected and, dare we say, goal-scoring connections. As the famous physicist Niels Bohr once quipped, "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future." Indeed, we embark on this Sherlockian quest armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, ready to unravel any mysteries or enigmas that may lie within the numbers.

After all, the realm of statistics is not immune to the allure of soccer puns and wordplay. As we kick off this investigation, we are reminded of the words of renowned statistician George Box, who reminded us that "all models are wrong, but some are useful." With this in mind, we seek to construct a model that not only captures the nuances of goal-scoring prowess but also sheds light on the potential link between sporting achievement and inventive creativity.

Given the widespread popularity of the UEFA European Cup and the Champions League, the impact of stellar goal-scoring performances in these competitions may extend beyond the football pitch. It is not inconceivable that the awe-inspiring feats of top goal scorers have a ripple effect that transcends geographic boundaries and permeates into the world of intellectual property and innovation. In the words of Sir Isaac Newton, "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Perhaps, in this context, the giants of European football may inadvertently contribute to the vision and foresight exhibited by inventors and innovators on the other side of the Atlantic.

Through the systematic analysis of goal-scoring data and patent grants, we aim to untangle the intricate web of factors that may underlie this curious relationship. Our foray into this unconventional arena not only pushes the boundaries of interdisciplinary research but also prompts us to ponder the unexpected connections that can arise when seemingly disparate domains intersect. As we embark on this statistical odyssey, our quest for insight is accompanied by a touch of humor and the awareness that, in the world of research, the unexpected often leads to the most illuminating discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Netting Innovations: The Link Between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and US Patents Granted

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and patents granted in the United States. Using data drawn from My Foot Ball Facts and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we analyze the goal-scoring performance of top scorers and the number of patents granted from 1975 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study offers intriguing insights into the potential influence of European football's top goal scorers on innovation and creativity in the American patent landscape, shedding light on the unanticipated interplay between sports and technological advancement.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the relationship between sports and various aspects of society has become an intriguing area of study. While it is well-established that sports can have a significant impact on cultural, social, and economic dynamics, the potential influence of athletic performance on technological innovation has been relatively understudied. In this study, we venture into the uncharted territory of exploring the connection between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. By delving into these seemingly disparate realms, we aim to unveil any hidden patterns or correlations that may exist between the prowess of European football's top goal scorers and the inventive output in the American patent landscape.
The blend of football and patent statistics may seem as incongruous as a physicist trying to score a goal in a Champions League final, yet the data-driven exploration of this nexus holds the promise of unearthing unexpected and, dare we say, goal-scoring connections. As the famous physicist Niels Bohr once quipped, "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future." Indeed, we embark on this Sherlockian quest armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, ready to unravel any mysteries or enigmas that may lie within the numbers.
After all, the realm of statistics is not immune to the allure of soccer puns and wordplay. As we kick off this investigation, we are reminded of the words of renowned statistician George Box, who reminded us that "all models are wrong, but some are useful." With this in mind, we seek to construct a model that not only captures the nuances of goal-scoring prowess but also sheds light on the potential link between sporting achievement and inventive creativity.
Given the widespread popularity of the UEFA European Cup and the Champions League, the impact of stellar goal-scoring performances in these competitions may extend beyond the football pitch. It is not inconceivable that the awe-inspiring feats of top goal scorers have a ripple effect that transcends geographic boundaries and permeates into the world of intellectual property and innovation. In the words of Sir Isaac Newton, "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Perhaps, in this context, the giants of European football may inadvertently contribute to the vision and foresight exhibited by inventors and innovators on the other side of the Atlantic.
Through the systematic analysis of goal-scoring data and patent grants, we aim to untangle the intricate web of factors that may underlie this curious relationship. Our foray into this unconventional arena not only pushes the boundaries of interdisciplinary research but also prompts us to ponder the unexpected connections that can arise when seemingly disparate domains intersect. As we embark on this statistical odyssey, our quest for insight is accompanied by a touch of humor and the awareness that, in the world of research, the unexpected often leads to the most illuminating discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between prominent sporting events and their potential impact on various socio-economic indicators has been a subject of growing interest in recent scholarly discourse. A nexus that has garnered relatively limited attention, albeit no less intriguing, is the relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. The authors find that this unexpected juxtaposition of European football prowess and inventive output reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 with a significance level of p < 0.01, hinting at the intersection between athletic achievements and technological advancements.

Smith and Doe (20XX) conducted a seminal study examining the correlation between sports performance and innovative activities in their groundbreaking work, "Sports, Innovation, and the Unpredictable Nature of Achievements." While their focus was predominantly on the influence of Olympic Games on industrial patents, their findings laid the groundwork for investigating the broader impact of sporting events on inventive endeavors. The authors uncovered compelling evidence suggesting that world-class athletic performances could potentially spur inventive activities, setting the stage for subsequent inquiries into the impact of European football tournaments on intellectual property generation.

Turning to a more eclectic array of sources, "The Patent Paradox" by Jones (20XY) offers a fascinating exploration of unexpected catalysts for technological innovation. Although the book primarily delves into paradoxical patterns within patent data, it inadvertently raises intriguing questions about the impact of unconventional stimuli, such as outstanding sports achievements, on inventive outputs. This interdisciplinary work provides a compelling backdrop for our investigation into the association between UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorers and US patent grants.

A more unconventional but no less enlightening source, "Football Fever: The Global Game and Its Remarkable Effects" by Johnson (20XZ), provides an anecdotal account of the widespread influence of football on global culture. While not a scholarly treatise, the book weaves together a captivating narrative of the permeation of football fervor into diverse aspects of society, inviting readers to ponder the unanticipated implications of athletic achievements on seemingly unrelated domains. This engaging work serves as a reminder of the far-reaching impact of sports phenomena, urging researchers to remain open to unexpected connections that may underpin societal dynamics.

In a lighter-hearted vein, the fictional realm also offers insights that, when interpreted metaphorically, can shed light on real-world phenomena. Consider, for instance, the allegorical resonance of J.K. Rowling's "Quidditch through the Ages" – a fantastical portrayal of a sport that captivates imaginations and blurs the boundaries between the mundane and the extraordinary. While patent grants may not be directly influenced by the wizarding world's airborne athletic pursuits, the underlying message of innovation and unbounded imagination resonates with our exploration of the interplay between football excellence and inventive endeavors.

The silver screen is not devoid of potential inspirations for our inquiry, as evidenced by the popular television series "The Big Bang Theory." Although ostensibly centered on the lives of physicists, the show frequently alludes to the broader impact of sporting events and pop culture phenomena on scientific and technological pursuits. While the link between UEFA European Cup top scorers and US patents may not be explicitly articulated in the sitcom's dialogue, its portrayal of the interplay between diverse realms of human experience encourages a nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics at play in our own investigation.

As we navigate through this literature review, the unexpected confluence of scholarly inquiries, fictional narratives, and popular culture representations highlights the multifaceted nature of the relationship between sports achievement and inventive outputs. While the pursuit of statistical rigor remains paramount, it is essential to acknowledge the potential for unforeseen connections and serendipitous inspirations that may illuminate our understanding of this intriguing interplay.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from My Foot Ball Facts and USPTO . You used data from 1975 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Netting Innovations: The Link Between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and US Patents Granted

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and patents granted in the United States. Using data drawn from My Foot Ball Facts and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we analyze the goal-scoring performance of top scorers and the number of patents granted from 1975 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study offers intriguing insights into the potential influence of European football's top goal scorers on innovation and creativity in the American patent landscape, shedding light on the unanticipated interplay between sports and technological advancement.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the relationship between sports and various aspects of society has become an intriguing area of study. While it is well-established that sports can have a significant impact on cultural, social, and economic dynamics, the potential influence of athletic performance on technological innovation has been relatively understudied. In this study, we venture into the uncharted territory of exploring the connection between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. By delving into these seemingly disparate realms, we aim to unveil any hidden patterns or correlations that may exist between the prowess of European football's top goal scorers and the inventive output in the American patent landscape.
The blend of football and patent statistics may seem as incongruous as a physicist trying to score a goal in a Champions League final, yet the data-driven exploration of this nexus holds the promise of unearthing unexpected and, dare we say, goal-scoring connections. As the famous physicist Niels Bohr once quipped, "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future." Indeed, we embark on this Sherlockian quest armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, ready to unravel any mysteries or enigmas that may lie within the numbers.
After all, the realm of statistics is not immune to the allure of soccer puns and wordplay. As we kick off this investigation, we are reminded of the words of renowned statistician George Box, who reminded us that "all models are wrong, but some are useful." With this in mind, we seek to construct a model that not only captures the nuances of goal-scoring prowess but also sheds light on the potential link between sporting achievement and inventive creativity.
Given the widespread popularity of the UEFA European Cup and the Champions League, the impact of stellar goal-scoring performances in these competitions may extend beyond the football pitch. It is not inconceivable that the awe-inspiring feats of top goal scorers have a ripple effect that transcends geographic boundaries and permeates into the world of intellectual property and innovation. In the words of Sir Isaac Newton, "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Perhaps, in this context, the giants of European football may inadvertently contribute to the vision and foresight exhibited by inventors and innovators on the other side of the Atlantic.
Through the systematic analysis of goal-scoring data and patent grants, we aim to untangle the intricate web of factors that may underlie this curious relationship. Our foray into this unconventional arena not only pushes the boundaries of interdisciplinary research but also prompts us to ponder the unexpected connections that can arise when seemingly disparate domains intersect. As we embark on this statistical odyssey, our quest for insight is accompanied by a touch of humor and the awareness that, in the world of research, the unexpected often leads to the most illuminating discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to explore the curious relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and US patents granted, we employed a blend of statistical analyses worthy of a winning goal-scoring play. Our data sources included the treasure troves of information from My Foot Ball Facts and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). With our data ranging from 1975 to 2020, we embarked on a methodological journey as thrilling as a last-minute extra-time goal.

To begin our statistical quest, we first undertook a detailed examination of the goal-scoring performances of the top scorers in the UEFA European Cup and the Champions League. Using the detailed historical data available, we tallied the number of goals scored by the top goal scorers in each competition season. It's akin to meticulously noting each stroke of a master painter's brush, except our canvas was the exhilarating world of net-ripping goals.

Simultaneously, we delved into the USPTO database to identify the number of patents granted each year, capturing the innovative output across a wide spectrum of technological domains. This process involved swimming through patent filings and intellectual property musings, akin to navigating a sea of creative ingenuity in a quest to find the treasure trove of inventive brilliance.

After assembling this wealth of data, we then unleashed the power of statistical analyses to unravel any potential correlations between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. Our statistical lineup included the formidable Pearson correlation coefficient and a series of rigorous regression models, akin to strategic formations and tactical plays in a high-stakes match.

Furthermore, we ensured our analyses accounted for potential confounding variables that could influence the relationship under scrutiny. Variables such as economic indicators, technological trends, and potentially disruptive shocks were given due consideration, akin to defenders closely marking a top goal scorer to prevent any unexpected scoring opportunities.

Finally, to bolster the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses and checked for potential outliers, ensuring our statistical conclusions were as resilient as a goalkeeper warding off a penalty kick. Our approach was as thorough and meticulous as a referee meticulously reviewing a contentious offside call, leaving no statistical stone unturned in our pursuit of rigorous and illuminating insights.

In essence, our methodological approach reflects the meticulousness and precision demanded by both statistical analysis and the high-stakes world of top-tier competitive football. By carefully combining these methodologies, we aim to illuminate the potential influence of football prowess on inventive creativity, while also injecting a dash of statistical humor and playfulness into the serious world of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from My Foot Ball Facts and USPTO .

For the time period 1975 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8106053, r-squared of 0.6570809, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Netting Innovations: The Link Between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and US Patents Granted

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and patents granted in the United States. Using data drawn from My Foot Ball Facts and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we analyze the goal-scoring performance of top scorers and the number of patents granted from 1975 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study offers intriguing insights into the potential influence of European football's top goal scorers on innovation and creativity in the American patent landscape, shedding light on the unanticipated interplay between sports and technological advancement.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In recent years, the relationship between sports and various aspects of society has become an intriguing area of study. While it is well-established that sports can have a significant impact on cultural, social, and economic dynamics, the potential influence of athletic performance on technological innovation has been relatively understudied. In this study, we venture into the uncharted territory of exploring the connection between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. By delving into these seemingly disparate realms, we aim to unveil any hidden patterns or correlations that may exist between the prowess of European football's top goal scorers and the inventive output in the American patent landscape.
The blend of football and patent statistics may seem as incongruous as a physicist trying to score a goal in a Champions League final, yet the data-driven exploration of this nexus holds the promise of unearthing unexpected and, dare we say, goal-scoring connections. As the famous physicist Niels Bohr once quipped, "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future." Indeed, we embark on this Sherlockian quest armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, ready to unravel any mysteries or enigmas that may lie within the numbers.
After all, the realm of statistics is not immune to the allure of soccer puns and wordplay. As we kick off this investigation, we are reminded of the words of renowned statistician George Box, who reminded us that "all models are wrong, but some are useful." With this in mind, we seek to construct a model that not only captures the nuances of goal-scoring prowess but also sheds light on the potential link between sporting achievement and inventive creativity.
Given the widespread popularity of the UEFA European Cup and the Champions League, the impact of stellar goal-scoring performances in these competitions may extend beyond the football pitch. It is not inconceivable that the awe-inspiring feats of top goal scorers have a ripple effect that transcends geographic boundaries and permeates into the world of intellectual property and innovation. In the words of Sir Isaac Newton, "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Perhaps, in this context, the giants of European football may inadvertently contribute to the vision and foresight exhibited by inventors and innovators on the other side of the Atlantic.
Through the systematic analysis of goal-scoring data and patent grants, we aim to untangle the intricate web of factors that may underlie this curious relationship. Our foray into this unconventional arena not only pushes the boundaries of interdisciplinary research but also prompts us to ponder the unexpected connections that can arise when seemingly disparate domains intersect. As we embark on this statistical odyssey, our quest for insight is accompanied by a touch of humor and the awareness that, in the world of research, the unexpected often leads to the most illuminating discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and US patents granted have unveiled a remarkable correlation that may raise a few eyebrows. Our analysis of the data spanning from 1975 to 2020 has uncloaked a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8106053, indicating a strong positive linear relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This coefficient suggests that there is a strong association between the goal-scoring prowess of top footballers in European competitions and the level of inventive output in the United States.

Further bolstering the strength of this relationship, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) is calculated at 0.6570809. This indicates that approximately 65.71% of the variability in the number of US patents granted can be explained by the variations in the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count. It is as if the top goal scorers in the UEFA competitions are taking direct free kicks straight into the world of patents, influencing the creative landscape across the Atlantic in ways that were previously unimagined.

The statistical significance of this correlation is also evident, as indicated by the p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation between the two variables due to random chance alone is less than 1%, adding weight to the argument that there is a genuine relationship between these distinct domains.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot showcases the strong positive correlation between the top scorer's goal count in the UEFA European Cup and Champions League and the number of patents granted in the United States. The plot reinforces the substantial association we have uncovered while inviting further contemplation on how the prowess of European football's top goal scorers seems to transcend the boundaries of sport and permeate into the realm of technological innovation.

The striking correlation we have unearthed holds significant implications for our understanding of the interplay between sports and innovation. It prompts us to ponder whether the fervor of football and the fervor of inventive creativity are not as mutually exclusive as they may appear. Perhaps there is a goal-scoring alchemy at play that leaps beyond the turf and into the realm of technological advancement, a form of 'patent magic' influenced by the mercurial footwork and goal-scoring exploits of football's elite.

In conclusion, our findings offer a unique perspective on the unexpected interplay between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. It is a reminder that even in the world of academia and research, the most unexpected connections can hold the key to unraveling profound mysteries, much like finding an elusive goal in the final minutes of a football match.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Netting Innovations: The Link Between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and US Patents Granted

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and patents granted in the United States. Using data drawn from My Foot Ball Facts and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we analyze the goal-scoring performance of top scorers and the number of patents granted from 1975 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study offers intriguing insights into the potential influence of European football's top goal scorers on innovation and creativity in the American patent landscape, shedding light on the unanticipated interplay between sports and technological advancement.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between prominent sporting events and their potential impact on various socio-economic indicators has been a subject of growing interest in recent scholarly discourse. A nexus that has garnered relatively limited attention, albeit no less intriguing, is the relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. The authors find that this unexpected juxtaposition of European football prowess and inventive output reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 with a significance level of p < 0.01, hinting at the intersection between athletic achievements and technological advancements.
Smith and Doe (20XX) conducted a seminal study examining the correlation between sports performance and innovative activities in their groundbreaking work, "Sports, Innovation, and the Unpredictable Nature of Achievements." While their focus was predominantly on the influence of Olympic Games on industrial patents, their findings laid the groundwork for investigating the broader impact of sporting events on inventive endeavors. The authors uncovered compelling evidence suggesting that world-class athletic performances could potentially spur inventive activities, setting the stage for subsequent inquiries into the impact of European football tournaments on intellectual property generation.
Turning to a more eclectic array of sources, "The Patent Paradox" by Jones (20XY) offers a fascinating exploration of unexpected catalysts for technological innovation. Although the book primarily delves into paradoxical patterns within patent data, it inadvertently raises intriguing questions about the impact of unconventional stimuli, such as outstanding sports achievements, on inventive outputs. This interdisciplinary work provides a compelling backdrop for our investigation into the association between UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorers and US patent grants.
A more unconventional but no less enlightening source, "Football Fever: The Global Game and Its Remarkable Effects" by Johnson (20XZ), provides an anecdotal account of the widespread influence of football on global culture. While not a scholarly treatise, the book weaves together a captivating narrative of the permeation of football fervor into diverse aspects of society, inviting readers to ponder the unanticipated implications of athletic achievements on seemingly unrelated domains. This engaging work serves as a reminder of the far-reaching impact of sports phenomena, urging researchers to remain open to unexpected connections that may underpin societal dynamics.
In a lighter-hearted vein, the fictional realm also offers insights that, when interpreted metaphorically, can shed light on real-world phenomena. Consider, for instance, the allegorical resonance of J.K. Rowling's "Quidditch through the Ages" – a fantastical portrayal of a sport that captivates imaginations and blurs the boundaries between the mundane and the extraordinary. While patent grants may not be directly influenced by the wizarding world's airborne athletic pursuits, the underlying message of innovation and unbounded imagination resonates with our exploration of the interplay between football excellence and inventive endeavors.
The silver screen is not devoid of potential inspirations for our inquiry, as evidenced by the popular television series "The Big Bang Theory." Although ostensibly centered on the lives of physicists, the show frequently alludes to the broader impact of sporting events and pop culture phenomena on scientific and technological pursuits. While the link between UEFA European Cup top scorers and US patents may not be explicitly articulated in the sitcom's dialogue, its portrayal of the interplay between diverse realms of human experience encourages a nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics at play in our own investigation.
As we navigate through this literature review, the unexpected confluence of scholarly inquiries, fictional narratives, and popular culture representations highlights the multifaceted nature of the relationship between sports achievement and inventive outputs. While the pursuit of statistical rigor remains paramount, it is essential to acknowledge the potential for unforeseen connections and serendipitous inspirations that may illuminate our understanding of this intriguing interplay.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and US patents granted have unveiled a remarkable correlation that may raise a few eyebrows. Our analysis of the data spanning from 1975 to 2020 has uncloaked a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8106053, indicating a strong positive linear relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This coefficient suggests that there is a strong association between the goal-scoring prowess of top footballers in European competitions and the level of inventive output in the United States.
Further bolstering the strength of this relationship, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) is calculated at 0.6570809. This indicates that approximately 65.71% of the variability in the number of US patents granted can be explained by the variations in the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count. It is as if the top goal scorers in the UEFA competitions are taking direct free kicks straight into the world of patents, influencing the creative landscape across the Atlantic in ways that were previously unimagined.
The statistical significance of this correlation is also evident, as indicated by the p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation between the two variables due to random chance alone is less than 1%, adding weight to the argument that there is a genuine relationship between these distinct domains.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot showcases the strong positive correlation between the top scorer's goal count in the UEFA European Cup and Champions League and the number of patents granted in the United States. The plot reinforces the substantial association we have uncovered while inviting further contemplation on how the prowess of European football's top goal scorers seems to transcend the boundaries of sport and permeate into the realm of technological innovation.
The striking correlation we have unearthed holds significant implications for our understanding of the interplay between sports and innovation. It prompts us to ponder whether the fervor of football and the fervor of inventive creativity are not as mutually exclusive as they may appear. Perhaps there is a goal-scoring alchemy at play that leaps beyond the turf and into the realm of technological advancement, a form of 'patent magic' influenced by the mercurial footwork and goal-scoring exploits of football's elite.
In conclusion, our findings offer a unique perspective on the unexpected interplay between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. It is a reminder that even in the world of academia and research, the most unexpected connections can hold the key to unraveling profound mysteries, much like finding an elusive goal in the final minutes of a football match.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The intriguing findings of our study illuminate a compelling association between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. As predicted, the robust correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 with a significance level of p < 0.01 lends weight to the hypothesis that top footballers' goal-scoring exploits may indeed harbor a deeper impact on the innovative landscape than previously assumed. Our results support prior research, including the groundbreaking work of Smith and Doe (20XX), who, in their exploration of the influence of Olympic Games on industrial patents, laid the groundwork for delineating the parallel impact of prominent sports achievements on inventive activities. It appears that the pandemonium on the football pitch and the pandemonium in the patent office may be more closely intertwined than meets the eye.

In our journey through the literature review, we cannot dismiss the sly wit of Jones (20XY) in underscoring the unexpected catalysts for technological innovation or the astute whimsy of Johnson's (20XZ) anecdotal musings on football's widespread influence. The resonant allegory of J.K. Rowling's quidditch tournaments and "patent magic" does not escape our attention, hinting at a subtle enchantment that may underpin the correlation we have unlocked. Furthermore, the portrayal of the unanticipated impact of sporting events and pop culture phenomena on scientific and technological pursuits in "The Big Bang Theory" inadvertently pokes at the latent resonance of our own investigation.

Our analysis conferred a tantalizing coefficient of determination of 0.6570809, indicative of the substantial influence of UEFA top goal scorers on US patent grants, akin to an unexpected fusion reaction creating new molecules of innovation. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01 attesting to the statistical significance of this correlation, it seems the odds of this association being a mere statistical fluke are slimmer than a wafer-thin margin of error.

The scatterplot in Figure 1 is a visual testament to the entwined dance of football finesse and patent productivity, hinting at a milieu where the dribbling of footballs and the drafting of patents intersect in a curious tango. These compelling results advocate for a subtle, yet substantial, influence of European football's elite on the inventive landscape of the United States.

In unraveling this unanticipated nexus between the thrill of football victories and the exhilaration of inventive feats, our study has unfurled a tapestry of interconnected realms, urging us to venture beyond the confines of traditional perspectives. Though our pursuit of statistical rigor remains unwavering, it is the serendipitous inspirations and unexplored connections that spark and propel our pursuits, much like an unexpected rabona kick amidst the predictable ebb and flow of a match.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and Patents granted in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Netting Innovations: The Link Between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and US Patents Granted

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and patents granted in the United States. Using data drawn from My Foot Ball Facts and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we analyze the goal-scoring performance of top scorers and the number of patents granted from 1975 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study offers intriguing insights into the potential influence of European football's top goal scorers on innovation and creativity in the American patent landscape, shedding light on the unanticipated interplay between sports and technological advancement.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In recent years, the relationship between sports and various aspects of society has become an intriguing area of study. While it is well-established that sports can have a significant impact on cultural, social, and economic dynamics, the potential influence of athletic performance on technological innovation has been relatively understudied. In this study, we venture into the uncharted territory of exploring the connection between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. By delving into these seemingly disparate realms, we aim to unveil any hidden patterns or correlations that may exist between the prowess of European football's top goal scorers and the inventive output in the American patent landscape.
The blend of football and patent statistics may seem as incongruous as a physicist trying to score a goal in a Champions League final, yet the data-driven exploration of this nexus holds the promise of unearthing unexpected and, dare we say, goal-scoring connections. As the famous physicist Niels Bohr once quipped, "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future." Indeed, we embark on this Sherlockian quest armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, ready to unravel any mysteries or enigmas that may lie within the numbers.
After all, the realm of statistics is not immune to the allure of soccer puns and wordplay. As we kick off this investigation, we are reminded of the words of renowned statistician George Box, who reminded us that "all models are wrong, but some are useful." With this in mind, we seek to construct a model that not only captures the nuances of goal-scoring prowess but also sheds light on the potential link between sporting achievement and inventive creativity.
Given the widespread popularity of the UEFA European Cup and the Champions League, the impact of stellar goal-scoring performances in these competitions may extend beyond the football pitch. It is not inconceivable that the awe-inspiring feats of top goal scorers have a ripple effect that transcends geographic boundaries and permeates into the world of intellectual property and innovation. In the words of Sir Isaac Newton, "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Perhaps, in this context, the giants of European football may inadvertently contribute to the vision and foresight exhibited by inventors and innovators on the other side of the Atlantic.
Through the systematic analysis of goal-scoring data and patent grants, we aim to untangle the intricate web of factors that may underlie this curious relationship. Our foray into this unconventional arena not only pushes the boundaries of interdisciplinary research but also prompts us to ponder the unexpected connections that can arise when seemingly disparate domains intersect. As we embark on this statistical odyssey, our quest for insight is accompanied by a touch of humor and the awareness that, in the world of research, the unexpected often leads to the most illuminating discoveries.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and US patents granted have unveiled a remarkable correlation that may raise a few eyebrows. Our analysis of the data spanning from 1975 to 2020 has uncloaked a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8106053, indicating a strong positive linear relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This coefficient suggests that there is a strong association between the goal-scoring prowess of top footballers in European competitions and the level of inventive output in the United States.
Further bolstering the strength of this relationship, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) is calculated at 0.6570809. This indicates that approximately 65.71% of the variability in the number of US patents granted can be explained by the variations in the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count. It is as if the top goal scorers in the UEFA competitions are taking direct free kicks straight into the world of patents, influencing the creative landscape across the Atlantic in ways that were previously unimagined.
The statistical significance of this correlation is also evident, as indicated by the p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation between the two variables due to random chance alone is less than 1%, adding weight to the argument that there is a genuine relationship between these distinct domains.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot showcases the strong positive correlation between the top scorer's goal count in the UEFA European Cup and Champions League and the number of patents granted in the United States. The plot reinforces the substantial association we have uncovered while inviting further contemplation on how the prowess of European football's top goal scorers seems to transcend the boundaries of sport and permeate into the realm of technological innovation.
The striking correlation we have unearthed holds significant implications for our understanding of the interplay between sports and innovation. It prompts us to ponder whether the fervor of football and the fervor of inventive creativity are not as mutually exclusive as they may appear. Perhaps there is a goal-scoring alchemy at play that leaps beyond the turf and into the realm of technological advancement, a form of 'patent magic' influenced by the mercurial footwork and goal-scoring exploits of football's elite.
In conclusion, our findings offer a unique perspective on the unexpected interplay between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and the number of patents granted in the United States. It is a reminder that even in the world of academia and research, the most unexpected connections can hold the key to unraveling profound mysteries, much like finding an elusive goal in the final minutes of a football match.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncovered a strikingly robust correlation between the goal-scoring performances of top footballers in UEFA competitions and the volume of patents granted in the United States. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8106053, akin to a precision pass from midfield, underscores the unexpected relationship between these seemingly incongruent domains. This revelation prompts a reevaluation of the potential impact of sporting prowess on inventive output, challenging conventional wisdom and injecting an element of surprise into the scholarly discourse.

The findings leave us pondering whether the penchants for play-making and patent-making may not be as divergent as previously assumed. It appears that, much like in a game of football, the underdog variables can surprise the favored hypotheses, scoring goals of insight and connection. The scatterplot in Figure 1 serves as a visual reminder that in the game of research, as in football, unanticipated moves can lead to the most thrilling outcomes.

The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of sports and innovation, permeating into the fabric of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we unpack the nuances of this unexpected relationship, we are reminded of the words of Albert Einstein, who remarked, "The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion that stands at the cradle of true art and true science." Indeed, our foray into this enigmatic linkage embodies the beauty and intrigue of scientific discovery, where the unexpected correlations can offer valuable insights that transcend disciplinary boundaries.

In light of these compelling findings, we assert that further research in this area may yield diminishing returns, akin to an injury-time goal when the outcome of the match is already decided. Our study stands as a testament to the serendipitous nature of research, where the most fortuitous connections can emerge from the unlikeliest of intersecting paths.

Therefore, we propose that the curiosity sparked by our investigation into the interplay between football's goal-scoring legends and the US patent landscape be channeled into exploring new frontiers of inquiry, where unexpected correlations and untapped connections await their own moment of discovery. As we conclude this chapter in the annals of research, we do so with a wry smile, knowing that in the world of science, as in football, the most spectacular goals can emerge from the most unexpected plays.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Netting Innovations: The Link Between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and US Patents Granted. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sport Innovation and Intellectual Property


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Netting Innovations: The Link Between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and US Patents Granted. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Soccer Analytics and Innovation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Netting Innovations: The Link Between UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count and US Patents Granted with an abstract of This paper examines the curious relationship between the UEFA European Cup and Champions League top scorer's goal count and patents granted in the United States. Using data drawn from My Foot Ball Facts and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we analyze the goal-scoring performance of top scorers and the number of patents granted from 1975 to 2020. Surprisingly, our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8106053 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study offers intriguing insights into the potential influence of European football's top goal scorers on innovation and creativity in the American patent landscape, shedding light on the unanticipated interplay between sports and technological advancement.

ChatGPT:

UEFA European Cup, Champions League, top scorer, goal count, US patents granted, correlation coefficient, significance level, My Foot Ball Facts, United States Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO, innovation, creativity, European football, technological advancement, sports influence, patents, goal-scoring performance, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count
Source: My Foot Ball Facts
See what else correlates with UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count

Patents granted in the US
Detailed data title: Total number of patents granted in the US
Source: USPTO
See what else correlates with Patents granted in the US

Correlation r = 0.8106053 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6570809 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Patents granted in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count) over the 46 years from 1975 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.7E-12. 0.0000000000086766652770613580
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 8.7E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 115,251,651,190 random variables You don't actually need 115 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 45 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 45 because we have two variables measured over a period of 46 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count (Goals scored)5755111067667774106677879510810910129891089812141217101612151215
Patents granted in the US (Patents granted)768107538869781705145241366170710646327661982726507724576862893858427210253399077106696107394109746113587113834121696124069163142169085175979183970184375187012181299157718196405182899185224191927244341247713276788302948326032325980333583351403339992391103388900




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5,7,5,5,11,10,6,7,6,6,7,7,7,4,10,6,6,7,7,8,7,9,5,10,8,10,9,10,12,9,8,9,10,8,9,8,12,14,12,17,10,16,12,15,12,15,])
array_2 = np.array([76810,75388,69781,70514,52413,66170,71064,63276,61982,72650,77245,76862,89385,84272,102533,99077,106696,107394,109746,113587,113834,121696,124069,163142,169085,175979,183970,184375,187012,181299,157718,196405,182899,185224,191927,244341,247713,276788,302948,326032,325980,333583,351403,339992,391103,388900,])
array_1_name = "UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count"
array_2_name = "Patents granted in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1258 · Black Variable ID: 101 · Red Variable ID: 848
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0