about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,138 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Lyric and the second variable is Super Bowl TV viewership.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone named Lyric is born, a secret message is embedded in the Super Bowl halftime show, drawing in more viewers who are unknowingly responding to the subliminal call of the Lyric clan. This has been going on for generations, and now the Lyric family is the real MVP of Super Bowl advertising.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cute 2D animation ] - In a cozy living room, a TV screen shows the thrilling Super Bowl game. A group of friends, eagerly watching the game, cheer and jeer as they munch on snacks. One friend named Lyric sits in the center of the group, confidently predicting every game play before it happens, leaving everyone in awe of their seemingly psychic abilities. The room is filled with excitement as they all hang onto Lyric's every word, making the Super Bowl viewing experience even more captivating. Enhanced Visual Depiction: An adorable 2D animated living room scene is created, with vibrant colors and warm lighting. The friends are depicted with endearing and expressive features, each with their unique reactions to the game. Lyric, with a thoughtful and confident expression, is surrounded by swirls of magical sparkles that hint at their extraordinary abilities. The TV screen flashes with dynamic animations of the Super Bowl game, adding to the sense of excitement in the room. All the characters exude an infectious energy, making the viewer feel the thrill of the game and the companionship of the friends. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: The increase in popularity of the first name Lyric caused Super Bowl TV viewership to also increase due to the little-known but scientifically proven "Lyric Effect." This effect stems from the fact that people named Lyric have an uncanny ability to predict which teams will make it to the Super Bowl, sparking widespread interest and drawing in more viewers. It's like they have a direct line to the sports gods or something.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim Brutalism Cute 2D animation Parallax art Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. The increase in popularity of the first name Lyric caused Super Bowl TV viewership to also increase due to the little-known but scientifically proven "Lyric Effect." This effect stems from the fact that people named Lyric have an uncanny ability to predict which teams will make it to the Super Bowl, sparking widespread interest and drawing in more viewers. It's like they have a direct line to the sports gods or something.
ChatGPT: In a cozy living room, a TV screen shows the thrilling Super Bowl game. A group of friends, eagerly watching the game, cheer and jeer as they munch on snacks. One friend named Lyric sits in the center of the group, confidently predicting every game play before it happens, leaving everyone in awe of their seemingly psychic abilities. The room is filled with excitement as they all hang onto Lyric's every word, making the Super Bowl viewing experience even more captivating.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy living room, a TV screen shows the thrilling Super Bowl game. A group of friends, eagerly watching the game, cheer and jeer as they munch on snacks. One friend named Lyric sits in the center of the group, confidently predicting every game play before it happens, leaving everyone in awe of their seemingly psychic abilities. The room is filled with excitement as they all hang onto Lyric's every word, making the Super Bowl viewing experience even more captivating. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cute 2D animation ] - In a cozy living room, a TV screen shows the thrilling Super Bowl game. A group of friends, eagerly watching the game, cheer and jeer as they munch on snacks. One friend named Lyric sits in the center of the group, confidently predicting every game play before it happens, leaving everyone in awe of their seemingly psychic abilities. The room is filled with excitement as they all hang onto Lyric's every word, making the Super Bowl viewing experience even more captivating. Enhanced Visual Depiction: An adorable 2D animated living room scene is created, with vibrant colors and warm lighting. The friends are depicted with endearing and expressive features, each with their unique reactions to the game. Lyric, with a thoughtful and confident expression, is surrounded by swirls of magical sparkles that hint at their extraordinary abilities. The TV screen flashes with dynamic animations of the Super Bowl game, adding to the sense of excitement in the room. All the characters exude an infectious energy, making the viewer feel the thrill of the game and the companionship of the friends.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Lyric caused Super Bowl TV viewership to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A Lyrical Touchdown: The Harmonious Connection between the Popularity of the Name Lyric and Super Bowl TV Viewership

The Journal of Linguistic Trends and Cultural Phenomena

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lyric and Super Bowl TV viewership. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Lyrical Touchdown: The Harmonious Connection between the Popularity of the Name Lyric and Super Bowl TV Viewership

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the lyrical world of names as we examine the connection between the prevalence of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the beloved American event, the Super Bowl. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we uncover a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1990 to 2022. The data suggest a harmonious alignment between the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" and the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. Our findings whimsically illuminate the notion that perhaps there is a melodious resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States. This peculiar association prompts further exploration into the enigmatic influence of names on societal phenomena, unlocking a realm of punny possibilities and musical musings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lyric and Super Bowl TV viewership. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Lyrical Touchdown: The Harmonious Connection between the Popularity of the Name Lyric and Super Bowl TV Viewership

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the lyrical world of names as we examine the connection between the prevalence of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the beloved American event, the Super Bowl. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we uncover a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1990 to 2022. The data suggest a harmonious alignment between the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" and the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. Our findings whimsically illuminate the notion that perhaps there is a melodious resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States. This peculiar association prompts further exploration into the enigmatic influence of names on societal phenomena, unlocking a realm of punny possibilities and musical musings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The art and science of naming have long captivated the human imagination, from Shakespearean characters to celebrity offspring. Names not only serve as personal identifiers but also hold sway over societal trends and cultural phenomena. In this study, we embark on a symphonic exploration of the name "Lyric" and its intriguing correlation with the viewership of the pinnacle of American sports entertainment – the Super Bowl.

As we delve into this lyrical journey, it is essential to appreciate the melodious origins of the name "Lyric." The term itself conjures images of poetic rhythm and musical cadence, evoking an air of artistic flair and harmonic resonance. Yet, amidst this lyrical allure, lies a fascinating connection to the mass phenomenon of Super Bowl viewership, prompting us to ponder the deeper harmonies at play in the cultural symphony.

On the surface, the idea of a name influencing a televised sports event may seem as whimsical as a musical comedy – but as we peel back the layers of data and statistical analyses, a compelling story unfolds. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we aim to uncover not only the magnitude of this correlation but also the potential underlying mechanisms orchestrating this seemingly fortuitous coupling of name popularity and TV viewership.

This exploration is rife with punny possibilities and musical musings, inviting us to consider whether the enchanting name "Lyric" acts as a melodic magnet, drawing the masses to the fervor of Super Bowl spectacle. With an eye toward statistical rigor and a penchant for playful pondering, we embark on this journey to unravel the harmonious connection between the name "Lyric" and the Super Bowl TV viewership, all the while weaving a symphony of data analysis and whimsical wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lyric and Super Bowl TV viewership. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Lyrical Touchdown: The Harmonious Connection between the Popularity of the Name Lyric and Super Bowl TV Viewership

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the lyrical world of names as we examine the connection between the prevalence of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the beloved American event, the Super Bowl. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we uncover a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1990 to 2022. The data suggest a harmonious alignment between the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" and the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. Our findings whimsically illuminate the notion that perhaps there is a melodious resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States. This peculiar association prompts further exploration into the enigmatic influence of names on societal phenomena, unlocking a realm of punny possibilities and musical musings.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The art and science of naming have long captivated the human imagination, from Shakespearean characters to celebrity offspring. Names not only serve as personal identifiers but also hold sway over societal trends and cultural phenomena. In this study, we embark on a symphonic exploration of the name "Lyric" and its intriguing correlation with the viewership of the pinnacle of American sports entertainment – the Super Bowl.
As we delve into this lyrical journey, it is essential to appreciate the melodious origins of the name "Lyric." The term itself conjures images of poetic rhythm and musical cadence, evoking an air of artistic flair and harmonic resonance. Yet, amidst this lyrical allure, lies a fascinating connection to the mass phenomenon of Super Bowl viewership, prompting us to ponder the deeper harmonies at play in the cultural symphony.
On the surface, the idea of a name influencing a televised sports event may seem as whimsical as a musical comedy – but as we peel back the layers of data and statistical analyses, a compelling story unfolds. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we aim to uncover not only the magnitude of this correlation but also the potential underlying mechanisms orchestrating this seemingly fortuitous coupling of name popularity and TV viewership.
This exploration is rife with punny possibilities and musical musings, inviting us to consider whether the enchanting name "Lyric" acts as a melodic magnet, drawing the masses to the fervor of Super Bowl spectacle. With an eye toward statistical rigor and a penchant for playful pondering, we embark on this journey to unravel the harmonious connection between the name "Lyric" and the Super Bowl TV viewership, all the while weaving a symphony of data analysis and whimsical wonder.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the connection between the popularity of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the Super Bowl spans various disciplines, entwining demographic trends with cultural phenomena. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of naming trends using data from the US Social Security Administration, uncovering intriguing patterns in the evolution of names over time. Their findings lay a solid foundation for understanding the societal significance of names and their potential impact on popular events.

In "Doe's Musings on Monikers" (2018), the author delves into the symbolic power of names, positing that certain names carry an inherent allure that influences public perception and engagement. This perspective provides a thought-provoking lens through which to examine the potential captivating effect of the name "Lyric" on Super Bowl viewership.

Jones (2020) explores the emotional resonance of names, suggesting that individuals may be drawn to names that evoke positive associations or personal connections. Could the name "Lyric" hold a place in the hearts of Super Bowl enthusiasts, eliciting an unconscious affinity for the event? The prospect of such a subconscious pull adds an element of intrigue to the investigation.

Transitioning from scholarly studies to literary sources, "The Power of a Name" (White, 2017) offers a captivating exploration of the significance of names across cultures and contexts. While not directly addressing the connection between name popularity and TV viewership, this work provides a broader perspective on the potential influence of names on societal phenomena.

In a whimsical departure, works of fiction such as "Musical Monikers: A Tale of Names and Notes" (Harper, 2019) and "Lyric's Legacy: A Story of Names and Numbers" (Taylor, 2021) transport readers to imaginary realms where the very essence of a name holds mystical powers. While these narratives may seem far removed from empirical research, they subtly beckon us to consider the enchanting allure of the name "Lyric" and its potential impact on the grand stage of the Super Bowl.

Turning to the world of animated entertainment, the resounding popularity of the children's television show "Name Ninjas" and the cartoon series "The Lyric Adventures of Super Bowl Rex" offers a playful reflection of the fascination with names and their ties to larger-than-life spectacles. The whimsy of these productions serves as a lighthearted reminder that the influence of names permeates various aspects of popular culture, including the realm of televised sports events.

Incorporating these diverse sources into the scholarly discourse widens the aperture through which we view the intersection of name popularity and TV viewership, infusing a touch of humor and imagination into the exploration. As we navigate the academic and literary landscapes, the underlying current of curiosity and jest propels us onward in this lyrical quest for understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lyric and Super Bowl TV viewership. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Statista . You used data from 1990 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Lyrical Touchdown: The Harmonious Connection between the Popularity of the Name Lyric and Super Bowl TV Viewership

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the lyrical world of names as we examine the connection between the prevalence of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the beloved American event, the Super Bowl. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we uncover a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1990 to 2022. The data suggest a harmonious alignment between the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" and the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. Our findings whimsically illuminate the notion that perhaps there is a melodious resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States. This peculiar association prompts further exploration into the enigmatic influence of names on societal phenomena, unlocking a realm of punny possibilities and musical musings.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The art and science of naming have long captivated the human imagination, from Shakespearean characters to celebrity offspring. Names not only serve as personal identifiers but also hold sway over societal trends and cultural phenomena. In this study, we embark on a symphonic exploration of the name "Lyric" and its intriguing correlation with the viewership of the pinnacle of American sports entertainment – the Super Bowl.
As we delve into this lyrical journey, it is essential to appreciate the melodious origins of the name "Lyric." The term itself conjures images of poetic rhythm and musical cadence, evoking an air of artistic flair and harmonic resonance. Yet, amidst this lyrical allure, lies a fascinating connection to the mass phenomenon of Super Bowl viewership, prompting us to ponder the deeper harmonies at play in the cultural symphony.
On the surface, the idea of a name influencing a televised sports event may seem as whimsical as a musical comedy – but as we peel back the layers of data and statistical analyses, a compelling story unfolds. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we aim to uncover not only the magnitude of this correlation but also the potential underlying mechanisms orchestrating this seemingly fortuitous coupling of name popularity and TV viewership.
This exploration is rife with punny possibilities and musical musings, inviting us to consider whether the enchanting name "Lyric" acts as a melodic magnet, drawing the masses to the fervor of Super Bowl spectacle. With an eye toward statistical rigor and a penchant for playful pondering, we embark on this journey to unravel the harmonious connection between the name "Lyric" and the Super Bowl TV viewership, all the while weaving a symphony of data analysis and whimsical wonder.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our research methodology harmoniously melded quantitative analysis with a whimsical spirit, as we sought to unravel the melodic mysteries surrounding the name "Lyric" and its curious connection to Super Bowl TV viewership.

Data Collection:
We embarked on a lyrical quest to gather data spanning the years 1990 to 2022, utilizing the vast repositories of the US Social Security Administration and Statista. Our team diligently scoured these databases, serenading the search engines with queries and coaxing forth datasets that encapsulated the ebbs and flows of "Lyric" as a given name, as well as the crescendos and diminuendos of Super Bowl viewership statistics.

Quantitative Analysis:
Armed with our harmonic datasets, we embarked on a statistical symphony that elegantly combined the resonance of correlation coefficients with the whimsy of name popularity trends. An ethereal dance of numbers ensued as we calculated the correlation coefficient, yielding a striking 0.9256100, with p < 0.01 casting a playful wink in the direction of statistical significance.

To further amplify the melodious insights gleaned from this analysis, we engaged in a cacophonous chorus of regression modeling, allowing us to serenade the data with predictive harmonies, uncovering the potential influences and reverberations of the name "Lyric" on the crescendos and diminuendos of Super Bowl viewership.

Ethical Considerations:
As we traversed this lyrical landscape of data, our research team remained attuned to the ethical dimensions of our investigation. We ensured the harmonious treatment of all data sources, respecting the confidential nature of individual naming choices while effectively capturing the collective cadence of name popularity trends and TV viewership dynamics.

Limitations:
Amidst the lyrical reverie of our research journey, it is essential to acknowledge the harmonious constraints that shaped our exploration. While our analysis focused on the enchanting name "Lyric" and its dancelike correlation with Super Bowl TV viewership, we recognize that the symphonic interplay of names and cultural phenomena encompasses a vast array of melodies yet to be orchestrated.

In conclusion, our methodological approach artfully blended the precision of statistical analysis with the poetic resonance of name trends, encapsulating a whimsical exploration that illuminates the harmonious connection between the name "Lyric" and the grandeur of the Super Bowl.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lyric and Super Bowl TV viewership. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Statista .

For the time period 1990 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9256100, r-squared of 0.8567539, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Lyrical Touchdown: The Harmonious Connection between the Popularity of the Name Lyric and Super Bowl TV Viewership

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the lyrical world of names as we examine the connection between the prevalence of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the beloved American event, the Super Bowl. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we uncover a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1990 to 2022. The data suggest a harmonious alignment between the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" and the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. Our findings whimsically illuminate the notion that perhaps there is a melodious resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States. This peculiar association prompts further exploration into the enigmatic influence of names on societal phenomena, unlocking a realm of punny possibilities and musical musings.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The art and science of naming have long captivated the human imagination, from Shakespearean characters to celebrity offspring. Names not only serve as personal identifiers but also hold sway over societal trends and cultural phenomena. In this study, we embark on a symphonic exploration of the name "Lyric" and its intriguing correlation with the viewership of the pinnacle of American sports entertainment – the Super Bowl.
As we delve into this lyrical journey, it is essential to appreciate the melodious origins of the name "Lyric." The term itself conjures images of poetic rhythm and musical cadence, evoking an air of artistic flair and harmonic resonance. Yet, amidst this lyrical allure, lies a fascinating connection to the mass phenomenon of Super Bowl viewership, prompting us to ponder the deeper harmonies at play in the cultural symphony.
On the surface, the idea of a name influencing a televised sports event may seem as whimsical as a musical comedy – but as we peel back the layers of data and statistical analyses, a compelling story unfolds. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we aim to uncover not only the magnitude of this correlation but also the potential underlying mechanisms orchestrating this seemingly fortuitous coupling of name popularity and TV viewership.
This exploration is rife with punny possibilities and musical musings, inviting us to consider whether the enchanting name "Lyric" acts as a melodic magnet, drawing the masses to the fervor of Super Bowl spectacle. With an eye toward statistical rigor and a penchant for playful pondering, we embark on this journey to unravel the harmonious connection between the name "Lyric" and the Super Bowl TV viewership, all the while weaving a symphony of data analysis and whimsical wonder.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected for the years 1990 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the Super Bowl. The correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and an r-squared of 0.8567539 indicated a robust and statistically significant relationship (p < 0.01) between these seemingly unrelated variables.

The findings are visually depicted in Fig. 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the harmonious alignment between the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" and the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. The plot hints at a symphonic connection between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States.

The implications of these results may seem as surprising as finding a lyrical gem in a statistical haystack. However, this study sheds light on the unconventional influence of names on societal phenomena, underscoring the whimsical yet compelling resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the fervor of the Super Bowl. This peculiar association invites further exploration into the enigmatic influence of names on cultural phenomena and highlights the need for future research to unravel the melodic magnetism between names and societal events.

In conclusion, this study playfully uncovers a harmonious connection between the name "Lyric" and the Super Bowl TV viewership, offering a lyrical touchdown in the field of name psychology and cultural phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lyric and Super Bowl TV viewership. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
A Lyrical Touchdown: The Harmonious Connection between the Popularity of the Name Lyric and Super Bowl TV Viewership

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the lyrical world of names as we examine the connection between the prevalence of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the beloved American event, the Super Bowl. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we uncover a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1990 to 2022. The data suggest a harmonious alignment between the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" and the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. Our findings whimsically illuminate the notion that perhaps there is a melodious resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States. This peculiar association prompts further exploration into the enigmatic influence of names on societal phenomena, unlocking a realm of punny possibilities and musical musings.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the connection between the popularity of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the Super Bowl spans various disciplines, entwining demographic trends with cultural phenomena. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of naming trends using data from the US Social Security Administration, uncovering intriguing patterns in the evolution of names over time. Their findings lay a solid foundation for understanding the societal significance of names and their potential impact on popular events.
In "Doe's Musings on Monikers" (2018), the author delves into the symbolic power of names, positing that certain names carry an inherent allure that influences public perception and engagement. This perspective provides a thought-provoking lens through which to examine the potential captivating effect of the name "Lyric" on Super Bowl viewership.
Jones (2020) explores the emotional resonance of names, suggesting that individuals may be drawn to names that evoke positive associations or personal connections. Could the name "Lyric" hold a place in the hearts of Super Bowl enthusiasts, eliciting an unconscious affinity for the event? The prospect of such a subconscious pull adds an element of intrigue to the investigation.
Transitioning from scholarly studies to literary sources, "The Power of a Name" (White, 2017) offers a captivating exploration of the significance of names across cultures and contexts. While not directly addressing the connection between name popularity and TV viewership, this work provides a broader perspective on the potential influence of names on societal phenomena.
In a whimsical departure, works of fiction such as "Musical Monikers: A Tale of Names and Notes" (Harper, 2019) and "Lyric's Legacy: A Story of Names and Numbers" (Taylor, 2021) transport readers to imaginary realms where the very essence of a name holds mystical powers. While these narratives may seem far removed from empirical research, they subtly beckon us to consider the enchanting allure of the name "Lyric" and its potential impact on the grand stage of the Super Bowl.
Turning to the world of animated entertainment, the resounding popularity of the children's television show "Name Ninjas" and the cartoon series "The Lyric Adventures of Super Bowl Rex" offers a playful reflection of the fascination with names and their ties to larger-than-life spectacles. The whimsy of these productions serves as a lighthearted reminder that the influence of names permeates various aspects of popular culture, including the realm of televised sports events.
Incorporating these diverse sources into the scholarly discourse widens the aperture through which we view the intersection of name popularity and TV viewership, infusing a touch of humor and imagination into the exploration. As we navigate the academic and literary landscapes, the underlying current of curiosity and jest propels us onward in this lyrical quest for understanding.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected for the years 1990 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the Super Bowl. The correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and an r-squared of 0.8567539 indicated a robust and statistically significant relationship (p < 0.01) between these seemingly unrelated variables.
The findings are visually depicted in Fig. 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the harmonious alignment between the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" and the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. The plot hints at a symphonic connection between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States.
The implications of these results may seem as surprising as finding a lyrical gem in a statistical haystack. However, this study sheds light on the unconventional influence of names on societal phenomena, underscoring the whimsical yet compelling resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the fervor of the Super Bowl. This peculiar association invites further exploration into the enigmatic influence of names on cultural phenomena and highlights the need for future research to unravel the melodic magnetism between names and societal events.
In conclusion, this study playfully uncovers a harmonious connection between the name "Lyric" and the Super Bowl TV viewership, offering a lyrical touchdown in the field of name psychology and cultural phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study undoubtedly strike a chord with the existing literature on the influence of names on societal phenomena. While some may raise an eyebrow at the seemingly whimsical nature of our inquiry into the lyrical allure of the name "Lyric," our findings harmonize with previous research that has hinted at the potential impact of names on public engagement.

Smith et al. (2015) laid the groundwork for our exploration by unveiling intriguing patterns in naming trends, establishing a sturdy platform for understanding the societal significance of names. We would be remiss not to note the clever play on words in their study title, "A Name by Any Other Trend: Unveiling the Melodic Rhythms of Naming Trends," which slyly nods to the melodic resonance of names. Likewise, "Doe's Musings on Monikers" (2018) and its contemplation of the inherent allure of names prepared us for the possibility of a captivating effect associated with the name "Lyric." Indeed, the enchanting charm of the name seems to have struck a harmonious chord with the Super Bowl viewership, validating the whimsical hypothesis posited in "The Power of a Name" (White, 2017).

Juxtaposing the academic works with literary sources and the world of animated entertainment softens the scholarly discourse with a touch of humor and whimsy. It's important to acknowledge that while these sources may seem playful on the surface, they encourage us to consider the magical allure of the name "Lyric" and its potential influence on grand social spectacles.

The statistically significant correlation coefficient and r-squared value revealed in our results support the notion that the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" is not merely a lyrical flight of fancy, but rather a resonant force that mirrors the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. This unexpected connection invites us to ponder the lighthearted yet compelling influence of names on cultural phenomena, leaving us to wonder whether our findings represent a statistical touchdown or an unexpected lyrical adagio in the realm of name psychology and societal events.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lyric and Super Bowl TV viewership. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Lyrical Touchdown: The Harmonious Connection between the Popularity of the Name Lyric and Super Bowl TV Viewership

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the lyrical world of names as we examine the connection between the prevalence of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the beloved American event, the Super Bowl. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we uncover a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1990 to 2022. The data suggest a harmonious alignment between the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" and the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. Our findings whimsically illuminate the notion that perhaps there is a melodious resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States. This peculiar association prompts further exploration into the enigmatic influence of names on societal phenomena, unlocking a realm of punny possibilities and musical musings.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The art and science of naming have long captivated the human imagination, from Shakespearean characters to celebrity offspring. Names not only serve as personal identifiers but also hold sway over societal trends and cultural phenomena. In this study, we embark on a symphonic exploration of the name "Lyric" and its intriguing correlation with the viewership of the pinnacle of American sports entertainment – the Super Bowl.
As we delve into this lyrical journey, it is essential to appreciate the melodious origins of the name "Lyric." The term itself conjures images of poetic rhythm and musical cadence, evoking an air of artistic flair and harmonic resonance. Yet, amidst this lyrical allure, lies a fascinating connection to the mass phenomenon of Super Bowl viewership, prompting us to ponder the deeper harmonies at play in the cultural symphony.
On the surface, the idea of a name influencing a televised sports event may seem as whimsical as a musical comedy – but as we peel back the layers of data and statistical analyses, a compelling story unfolds. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we aim to uncover not only the magnitude of this correlation but also the potential underlying mechanisms orchestrating this seemingly fortuitous coupling of name popularity and TV viewership.
This exploration is rife with punny possibilities and musical musings, inviting us to consider whether the enchanting name "Lyric" acts as a melodic magnet, drawing the masses to the fervor of Super Bowl spectacle. With an eye toward statistical rigor and a penchant for playful pondering, we embark on this journey to unravel the harmonious connection between the name "Lyric" and the Super Bowl TV viewership, all the while weaving a symphony of data analysis and whimsical wonder.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected for the years 1990 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the Super Bowl. The correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and an r-squared of 0.8567539 indicated a robust and statistically significant relationship (p < 0.01) between these seemingly unrelated variables.
The findings are visually depicted in Fig. 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the harmonious alignment between the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" and the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. The plot hints at a symphonic connection between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States.
The implications of these results may seem as surprising as finding a lyrical gem in a statistical haystack. However, this study sheds light on the unconventional influence of names on societal phenomena, underscoring the whimsical yet compelling resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the fervor of the Super Bowl. This peculiar association invites further exploration into the enigmatic influence of names on cultural phenomena and highlights the need for future research to unravel the melodic magnetism between names and societal events.
In conclusion, this study playfully uncovers a harmonious connection between the name "Lyric" and the Super Bowl TV viewership, offering a lyrical touchdown in the field of name psychology and cultural phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this study, we have harmoniously linked the popularity of the name "Lyric" with the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl, painting a picture as vivid as a pop ballad. Our findings suggest that there is a melodic resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States, akin to a perfectly orchestrated symphony. This whimsical web of correlation prompts us to consider the lyrical effect of names on societal phenomena, inviting us to dance to the statistical beat of our findings.

The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant relationship uncovered in our analysis indicate that there may be more to a name than meets the eye – or ear. It appears that the name "Lyric" may possess a certain lyrical charm that harmonizes with the fervor of the Super Bowl, drawing viewers in like a catchy chorus. This revelation may seem pleasantly surprising, akin to stumbling upon a delightful melody in a statistical sonata.

As we bid adieu to this lyrical expedition, we are left with a sense of wonder and curiosity, much like the lingering echo of a well-crafted tune. Our punny ponderings and musical musings have paved the way for future research, hinting at a symphony of possibilities in the realm of name psychology and cultural phenomena. However, it is worth noting that, much like a perfect chorus, our findings have struck a harmonious chord that may not require further attunement. Therefore, this study posits that no future research is needed in this harmonious area of inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Lyrical Touchdown: The Harmonious Connection between the Popularity of the Name Lyric and Super Bowl TV Viewership. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Linguistic Trends and Cultural Phenomena


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Lyrical Touchdown: The Harmonious Connection between the Popularity of the Name Lyric and Super Bowl TV Viewership. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Name and Event Synchronicity Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Lyrical Touchdown: The Harmonious Connection between the Popularity of the Name Lyric and Super Bowl TV Viewership with an abstract of This study delves into the lyrical world of names as we examine the connection between the prevalence of the name "Lyric" and the viewership of the beloved American event, the Super Bowl. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, we uncover a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9256100 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning from 1990 to 2022. The data suggest a harmonious alignment between the rising popularity of the name "Lyric" and the soaring viewership of the Super Bowl. Our findings whimsically illuminate the notion that perhaps there is a melodious resonance between the enchanting name "Lyric" and the allure of the highest-profile sporting event in the United States. This peculiar association prompts further exploration into the enigmatic influence of names on societal phenomena, unlocking a realm of punny possibilities and musical musings.

ChatGPT:

"Lyric name popularity," "Super Bowl TV viewership correlation," "US Social Security Administration data," "Statista viewership data," "name influence on societal phenomena," "music-themed names impact," "Super Bowl popularity trends," "name trends analysis," "sports event viewership analysis," "correlation coefficient significance," "musical influence on event popularity."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Lyric
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Lyric
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Lyric

Super Bowl TV viewership
Detailed data title: Super Bowl TV viewership in the United States
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Super Bowl TV viewership

Correlation r = 0.9256100 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8567539 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Super Bowl TV viewership) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Lyric) over the 33 years from 1990 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-14. 0.0000000000000126893464775297
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 1.3E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 78,806,264,906,613 random variables You don't actually need 78 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 32 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 32 because we have two variables measured over a period of 33 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Lyric (Babies born)191420164435644439939135931430337442842346860076395510171071122113471442147813651351129112401062991957877
Super Bowl TV viewership (Viewership)7385000079510000795900009099000090000000834200009408000087870000900000008372000088470000843400008680000088640000897900008607000090750000931800009745000098730000106480000111010000111350000108690000112190000114440000111860000111320000103390000981900001004500009163000099180000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([19,14,20,16,44,356,444,399,391,359,314,303,374,428,423,468,600,763,955,1017,1071,1221,1347,1442,1478,1365,1351,1291,1240,1062,991,957,877,])
array_2 = np.array([73850000,79510000,79590000,90990000,90000000,83420000,94080000,87870000,90000000,83720000,88470000,84340000,86800000,88640000,89790000,86070000,90750000,93180000,97450000,98730000,106480000,111010000,111350000,108690000,112190000,114440000,111860000,111320000,103390000,98190000,100450000,91630000,99180000,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Lyric"
array_2_name = "Super Bowl TV viewership"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 1138 · Black Variable ID: 2975 · Red Variable ID: 394
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0