about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,632 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Layne and the second variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Perhaps every time someone heard the name Layne, they couldn't help but think of the traffic lane moving steadily to the left. This subliminally instilled a preference for the party symbolized by the color blue, leading to more votes for the Democrat candidate. After all, Layne sounds like a political power move! Remember, it's all about that cognitive dissonance for a chance at electoral resonance!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a crowded, vibrant street in Colorado, bustling with colorful individuals engaging in lively conversations. Amidst the lively scene, the name "Layne" resonates, triggering a mental flash of a traffic lane moving steadily to the left in people's minds. The setting transitions to a voting booth, where the subliminal association of the name Layne with the color blue leads to an increased number of votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate. Capture the energetic atmosphere of the lively street and the subtle influence of the name on the voting process, infusing the imagery with the bold, vivid style of pop art. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics Sci-fi fantacy Pop art Cyber folk Cubism
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado, in the following situation: Perhaps every time someone heard the name Layne, they couldn't help but think of the traffic lane moving steadily to the left. This subliminally instilled a preference for the party symbolized by the color blue, leading to more votes for the Democrat candidate. After all, Layne sounds like a political power move! Remember, it's all about that cognitive dissonance for a chance at electoral resonance!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A crowded street in Colorado, with people chatting and walking along the sidewalk. The name "Layne" is heard, and a mental image of a traffic lane moving steadily to the left flashes in people's minds. The scene then shifts to the voting booth, where people subconsciously associate the name Layne with the color blue, leading to a higher number of votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: A crowded street in Colorado, with people chatting and walking along the sidewalk. The name "Layne" is heard, and a mental image of a traffic lane moving steadily to the left flashes in people's minds. The scene then shifts to the voting booth, where people subconsciously associate the name Layne with the color blue, leading to a higher number of votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a crowded, vibrant street in Colorado, bustling with colorful individuals engaging in lively conversations. Amidst the lively scene, the name "Layne" resonates, triggering a mental flash of a traffic lane moving steadily to the left in people's minds. The setting transitions to a voting booth, where the subliminal association of the name Layne with the color blue leads to an increased number of votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate. Capture the energetic atmosphere of the lively street and the subtle influence of the name on the voting process, infusing the imagery with the bold, vivid style of pop art.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Layne caused Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Colorado to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Layne Train: An Examination of the Connection Between the Popularity of the First Name Layne and Democratic Presidential Votes in Colorado

The Journal of Nameology and Political Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8559841 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Layne Train: An Examination of the Connection Between the Popularity of the First Name Layne and Democratic Presidential Votes in Colorado

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enthralling territory of the relationship between a name and political tendencies. Using data curated from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team aimed to unravel the enigma surrounding the prominence of the first name Layne and its potential influence on Colorado's preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Our findings reveal a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8559841 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1976 to 2020. While the data suggests a discernible association, we cannot help but wonder if the Layne train might have had an express stop in Colorado during elections, leading to this notable correlation. Further investigation into the allure and charisma associated with the name Layne may provide insights into its impact on political affinities, adding an amusing layer to the tapestry of electoral dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Layne Train: An Examination of the Connection Between the Popularity of the First Name Layne and Democratic Presidential Votes in Colorado

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enthralling territory of the relationship between a name and political tendencies. Using data curated from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team aimed to unravel the enigma surrounding the prominence of the first name Layne and its potential influence on Colorado's preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Our findings reveal a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8559841 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1976 to 2020. While the data suggests a discernible association, we cannot help but wonder if the Layne train might have had an express stop in Colorado during elections, leading to this notable correlation. Further investigation into the allure and charisma associated with the name Layne may provide insights into its impact on political affinities, adding an amusing layer to the tapestry of electoral dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between individuals' names and their behavioral, social, and even political inclinations has long been a subject of fascination. From "Napoleon complex" to "Karen memes," the association between nomenclature and characteristics has permeated popular culture and academic research alike. In this study, we explore the captivating nexus of the popularity of the first name Layne and its potential influence on votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the diverse and politically engaging state of Colorado.

While one may ponder if the popular phrase "All aboard the Layne train" inspired this investigation, our research aims to dispassionately unearth any substantive connections between the name Layne and political preferences. Past studies have examined similar phenomena with other names, from the impact of "Bob" on barbecue consumption to the correlation of "Sarah" with voting patterns in states with picturesque autumn foliage. Both amusing and thought-provoking, these inquiries attest to the multifaceted nature of human psychology and societal dynamics.

The state of Colorado, with its blend of urban and rural communities, its majestic peaks, and its penchant for independent thought, forms an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The interplay between the Laynes and democratic votes in Colorado will offer an illuminating case study in the realm of socio-political nomenclature dynamics. Our analysis will endeavor to shed light on this notable correlation and examine potential underlying factors that may contribute to this peculiar association.

As we delve into the empirical evidence and statistical models, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly expedition that combines empirical rigor with a touch of whimsy. We anticipate that our findings will not only contribute to the literature on name-based influence but also provide a lighthearted glimpse into the curiosities of electoral dynamics. With bated breath and statistical software at the ready, let us embark on this endeavor to decipher the Layne train's impact on the political landscape in the colorful state of Colorado.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Layne Train: An Examination of the Connection Between the Popularity of the First Name Layne and Democratic Presidential Votes in Colorado

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enthralling territory of the relationship between a name and political tendencies. Using data curated from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team aimed to unravel the enigma surrounding the prominence of the first name Layne and its potential influence on Colorado's preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Our findings reveal a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8559841 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1976 to 2020. While the data suggests a discernible association, we cannot help but wonder if the Layne train might have had an express stop in Colorado during elections, leading to this notable correlation. Further investigation into the allure and charisma associated with the name Layne may provide insights into its impact on political affinities, adding an amusing layer to the tapestry of electoral dynamics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between individuals' names and their behavioral, social, and even political inclinations has long been a subject of fascination. From "Napoleon complex" to "Karen memes," the association between nomenclature and characteristics has permeated popular culture and academic research alike. In this study, we explore the captivating nexus of the popularity of the first name Layne and its potential influence on votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the diverse and politically engaging state of Colorado.
While one may ponder if the popular phrase "All aboard the Layne train" inspired this investigation, our research aims to dispassionately unearth any substantive connections between the name Layne and political preferences. Past studies have examined similar phenomena with other names, from the impact of "Bob" on barbecue consumption to the correlation of "Sarah" with voting patterns in states with picturesque autumn foliage. Both amusing and thought-provoking, these inquiries attest to the multifaceted nature of human psychology and societal dynamics.
The state of Colorado, with its blend of urban and rural communities, its majestic peaks, and its penchant for independent thought, forms an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The interplay between the Laynes and democratic votes in Colorado will offer an illuminating case study in the realm of socio-political nomenclature dynamics. Our analysis will endeavor to shed light on this notable correlation and examine potential underlying factors that may contribute to this peculiar association.
As we delve into the empirical evidence and statistical models, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly expedition that combines empirical rigor with a touch of whimsy. We anticipate that our findings will not only contribute to the literature on name-based influence but also provide a lighthearted glimpse into the curiosities of electoral dynamics. With bated breath and statistical software at the ready, let us embark on this endeavor to decipher the Layne train's impact on the political landscape in the colorful state of Colorado.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The interconnectedness of names and behavior has been a topic of humorous contemplation and serious inquiry alike. Various researchers have delved into the intriguing world of nomenclature dynamics and its potential impact on societal inclinations. Smith et al. (2010) explored the influence of names on political affiliations, while Doe (2015) examined the correlation between names and consumer preferences. In a similar vein, Jones (2018) investigated the relationship between names and societal trends, paving the way for a whimsical journey into the impact of nomenclature on political tendencies.

Turning our attention to non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner presents a compelling exploration of unexpected correlations in human behavior, offering insightful parallels to our investigation. Additionally, "Nudge" by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein sheds light on the myriad ways in which subtle influences shape decision-making, leading us to ponder the potential nudges at play in the Layne phenomenon.

On a more fictional note, the works of Jane Austen, renowned for her astute observations of societal nuances, hold a certain relevance in contemplating the intriguing interplay of names and proclivities. Similarly, the dystopian universe of George Orwell's "1984" serves as a cautionary tale, prompting reflection on the subtleties of linguistic influence in shaping societal allegiances.

In the realm of social media, a tweet from @PunnyPundit sparks contemplation: "Is Colorado the Layne of the land for Democratic candidates? πŸš‚πŸ’™ #LayneTrain"

Another intriguing post from @NameNerdChic muses, "The Layne train appears to be gaining steam in Colorado, but is it a whistle-stop for Democratic votes or just a coincidental correlation? #NomenclatureNexus"

With this varied and whimsical backdrop, we embark on our own investigation into the captivating interplay of the Layne phenomenon and Democratic presidential votes in the charming state of Colorado.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Layne Train: An Examination of the Connection Between the Popularity of the First Name Layne and Democratic Presidential Votes in Colorado

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enthralling territory of the relationship between a name and political tendencies. Using data curated from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team aimed to unravel the enigma surrounding the prominence of the first name Layne and its potential influence on Colorado's preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Our findings reveal a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8559841 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1976 to 2020. While the data suggests a discernible association, we cannot help but wonder if the Layne train might have had an express stop in Colorado during elections, leading to this notable correlation. Further investigation into the allure and charisma associated with the name Layne may provide insights into its impact on political affinities, adding an amusing layer to the tapestry of electoral dynamics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between individuals' names and their behavioral, social, and even political inclinations has long been a subject of fascination. From "Napoleon complex" to "Karen memes," the association between nomenclature and characteristics has permeated popular culture and academic research alike. In this study, we explore the captivating nexus of the popularity of the first name Layne and its potential influence on votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the diverse and politically engaging state of Colorado.
While one may ponder if the popular phrase "All aboard the Layne train" inspired this investigation, our research aims to dispassionately unearth any substantive connections between the name Layne and political preferences. Past studies have examined similar phenomena with other names, from the impact of "Bob" on barbecue consumption to the correlation of "Sarah" with voting patterns in states with picturesque autumn foliage. Both amusing and thought-provoking, these inquiries attest to the multifaceted nature of human psychology and societal dynamics.
The state of Colorado, with its blend of urban and rural communities, its majestic peaks, and its penchant for independent thought, forms an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The interplay between the Laynes and democratic votes in Colorado will offer an illuminating case study in the realm of socio-political nomenclature dynamics. Our analysis will endeavor to shed light on this notable correlation and examine potential underlying factors that may contribute to this peculiar association.
As we delve into the empirical evidence and statistical models, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly expedition that combines empirical rigor with a touch of whimsy. We anticipate that our findings will not only contribute to the literature on name-based influence but also provide a lighthearted glimpse into the curiosities of electoral dynamics. With bated breath and statistical software at the ready, let us embark on this endeavor to decipher the Layne train's impact on the political landscape in the colorful state of Colorado.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our analytical odyssey into the mystical realm of name-based influence on political proclivities, we employed a rigorous yet delightfully eclectic assortment of research methods. The first step of our journey involved sourcing data on the popularity of the first name Layne from the multifaceted repository of the US Social Security Administration. This treasure trove of nomenclatural information provided us with a comprehensive view of the ebbs and flows of Laynes across the United States from 1976 to 2020.

In parallel, our intrepid band of researchers sought to capture the electoral zeitgeist in Colorado through the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. This digital treasure trove bestowed upon us the electoral votes cast for Democratic Presidential candidates within the Rocky Mountain state, allowing us to discern patterns and correlations that may have eluded casual observers.

With both datasets securely in hand, we unleashed the formidable powers of statistical analysis, employing the ever-reliable correlation coefficient to unveil potential connections between the name Layne and the jaunty tempo of Democratic votes in Colorado. This analytical flamenco dance revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8559841, sending ripples of intrigue through our research enclave.

Furthermore, we dutifully subjected our findings to the scrutiny of statistical inference, yielding a p-value less than 0.01. This statistical gem glimmered in the light of empirical scrutiny, bolstering our confidence in the substantive nature of the relationship we had uncovered.

Amidst the sea of digits and p-values, we also took a moment to reflect on the whimsical nature of our investigation. As we charted the correlation course, a brief pause for mirth consoled our academic souls, pondering if the Layne train had indeed made a serendipitous stop in the conspicuous landscape of Colorado during elections, leaving a trail of statistical breadcrumbs for us to decipher.

In this enchanting fusion of empirical rigor and informal musings, our methodology reverberates with the spirit of scholarly inquiry tinged with a touch of caprice. As we prepare to unveil our findings, we invite readers to join us in rattling the windows of conventional discourse and peering through the kaleidoscope of nomenclatural influence in the political arena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8559841, r-squared of 0.7327088, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Layne Train: An Examination of the Connection Between the Popularity of the First Name Layne and Democratic Presidential Votes in Colorado

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enthralling territory of the relationship between a name and political tendencies. Using data curated from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team aimed to unravel the enigma surrounding the prominence of the first name Layne and its potential influence on Colorado's preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Our findings reveal a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8559841 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1976 to 2020. While the data suggests a discernible association, we cannot help but wonder if the Layne train might have had an express stop in Colorado during elections, leading to this notable correlation. Further investigation into the allure and charisma associated with the name Layne may provide insights into its impact on political affinities, adding an amusing layer to the tapestry of electoral dynamics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between individuals' names and their behavioral, social, and even political inclinations has long been a subject of fascination. From "Napoleon complex" to "Karen memes," the association between nomenclature and characteristics has permeated popular culture and academic research alike. In this study, we explore the captivating nexus of the popularity of the first name Layne and its potential influence on votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the diverse and politically engaging state of Colorado.
While one may ponder if the popular phrase "All aboard the Layne train" inspired this investigation, our research aims to dispassionately unearth any substantive connections between the name Layne and political preferences. Past studies have examined similar phenomena with other names, from the impact of "Bob" on barbecue consumption to the correlation of "Sarah" with voting patterns in states with picturesque autumn foliage. Both amusing and thought-provoking, these inquiries attest to the multifaceted nature of human psychology and societal dynamics.
The state of Colorado, with its blend of urban and rural communities, its majestic peaks, and its penchant for independent thought, forms an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The interplay between the Laynes and democratic votes in Colorado will offer an illuminating case study in the realm of socio-political nomenclature dynamics. Our analysis will endeavor to shed light on this notable correlation and examine potential underlying factors that may contribute to this peculiar association.
As we delve into the empirical evidence and statistical models, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly expedition that combines empirical rigor with a touch of whimsy. We anticipate that our findings will not only contribute to the literature on name-based influence but also provide a lighthearted glimpse into the curiosities of electoral dynamics. With bated breath and statistical software at the ready, let us embark on this endeavor to decipher the Layne train's impact on the political landscape in the colorful state of Colorado.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Through our analysis of data spanning from 1976 to 2020, a compelling correlation emerged between the popularity of the first name Layne and the votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado. Our statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8559841, indicating a strong positive relationship between the variables. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.7327088, suggesting that approximately 73% of the variation in Democratic votes can be explained by the popularity of the name Layne. With a p-value less than 0.01, our findings not only indicate statistical significance but also prompt us to envision a train of Laynes making a significant impact on the political landscape of Colorado.

In Figure 1, a scatterplot visually encapsulates the robust association between the frequency of the name Layne and Democratic votes in Colorado, leaving little room for doubt regarding the correlation. This scatterplot, akin to a snapshot of Laynes boarding the train to Democratic support, vividly illustrates the striking connection we've uncovered.

It is intriguing to note that while the causality remains beyond the scope of this study, the data provides a compelling portrayal of the Layne train's journey through Colorado's political landscape. One can't help but entertain the playful notion of Laynes wielding an unforeseen influence on the state's electoral inclinations, much like a whimsical character in a political fairy tale.

These results not only add a touch of mirth to the serious business of political analysis but also underscore the potential impact of an individual's nomenclature on their affiliations and electoral conduct. The Layne train, it seems, has left an indelible mark on the colorful state of Colorado, winding its way through the political terrain in a manner that beckons further exploration and jovial contemplation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Layne Train: An Examination of the Connection Between the Popularity of the First Name Layne and Democratic Presidential Votes in Colorado

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enthralling territory of the relationship between a name and political tendencies. Using data curated from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team aimed to unravel the enigma surrounding the prominence of the first name Layne and its potential influence on Colorado's preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Our findings reveal a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8559841 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1976 to 2020. While the data suggests a discernible association, we cannot help but wonder if the Layne train might have had an express stop in Colorado during elections, leading to this notable correlation. Further investigation into the allure and charisma associated with the name Layne may provide insights into its impact on political affinities, adding an amusing layer to the tapestry of electoral dynamics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The interconnectedness of names and behavior has been a topic of humorous contemplation and serious inquiry alike. Various researchers have delved into the intriguing world of nomenclature dynamics and its potential impact on societal inclinations. Smith et al. (2010) explored the influence of names on political affiliations, while Doe (2015) examined the correlation between names and consumer preferences. In a similar vein, Jones (2018) investigated the relationship between names and societal trends, paving the way for a whimsical journey into the impact of nomenclature on political tendencies.
Turning our attention to non-fiction literature, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner presents a compelling exploration of unexpected correlations in human behavior, offering insightful parallels to our investigation. Additionally, "Nudge" by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein sheds light on the myriad ways in which subtle influences shape decision-making, leading us to ponder the potential nudges at play in the Layne phenomenon.
On a more fictional note, the works of Jane Austen, renowned for her astute observations of societal nuances, hold a certain relevance in contemplating the intriguing interplay of names and proclivities. Similarly, the dystopian universe of George Orwell's "1984" serves as a cautionary tale, prompting reflection on the subtleties of linguistic influence in shaping societal allegiances.
In the realm of social media, a tweet from @PunnyPundit sparks contemplation: "Is Colorado the Layne of the land for Democratic candidates? πŸš‚πŸ’™ #LayneTrain"
Another intriguing post from @NameNerdChic muses, "The Layne train appears to be gaining steam in Colorado, but is it a whistle-stop for Democratic votes or just a coincidental correlation? #NomenclatureNexus"
With this varied and whimsical backdrop, we embark on our own investigation into the captivating interplay of the Layne phenomenon and Democratic presidential votes in the charming state of Colorado.

[[RESULTS]]
Through our analysis of data spanning from 1976 to 2020, a compelling correlation emerged between the popularity of the first name Layne and the votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado. Our statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8559841, indicating a strong positive relationship between the variables. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.7327088, suggesting that approximately 73% of the variation in Democratic votes can be explained by the popularity of the name Layne. With a p-value less than 0.01, our findings not only indicate statistical significance but also prompt us to envision a train of Laynes making a significant impact on the political landscape of Colorado.
In Figure 1, a scatterplot visually encapsulates the robust association between the frequency of the name Layne and Democratic votes in Colorado, leaving little room for doubt regarding the correlation. This scatterplot, akin to a snapshot of Laynes boarding the train to Democratic support, vividly illustrates the striking connection we've uncovered.
It is intriguing to note that while the causality remains beyond the scope of this study, the data provides a compelling portrayal of the Layne train's journey through Colorado's political landscape. One can't help but entertain the playful notion of Laynes wielding an unforeseen influence on the state's electoral inclinations, much like a whimsical character in a political fairy tale.
These results not only add a touch of mirth to the serious business of political analysis but also underscore the potential impact of an individual's nomenclature on their affiliations and electoral conduct. The Layne train, it seems, has left an indelible mark on the colorful state of Colorado, winding its way through the political terrain in a manner that beckons further exploration and jovial contemplation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings present an intriguing juncture where the whimsical and the empirical converge, as we discuss the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Layne and Colorado's Democratic Presidential votes. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8559841, with a p-value less than 0.01, not only echoes the comical musings of @PunnyPundit and @NameNerdChic but also aligns with the serious inquiries of Smith et al. (2010) into the influence of names on political affiliations. The Layne phenomenon, it seems, has found an unexpected parallel in the political arena, akin to the subtle nudges explored by Thaler and Sunstein in "Nudge."

The compelling r-squared value of 0.7327088 further corroborates the persuasive nature of the Layne train's impact on Democratic votes in Colorado. This outcome humorously mirrors the astute societal observations in the works of Jane Austen, juxtaposing our statistical analysis with the intricacies of societal nuances found in Austen's acclaimed novels.

As we reflect on the results, it's impossible to overlook the amusing imagery evoked by the scatterplot, akin to a snapshot of Laynes boarding the train to Democratic support. This visual representation engagingly captures the unwavering connection we've uncovered, much like a whimsical character in a political fairy tale. The correlation, while not implying causation, invites delightful contemplation on the Layne train's journey through Colorado's political landscape.

Our study not only contributes to the academic discourse on the influence of nomenclature on societal inclinations but also injects a whimsical undertone into the somber realm of political analysis. The Layne train, it seems, has left an indelible mark on the vibrant state of Colorado, beckoning further exploration with a twinkle in its metaphorical eye.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Layne Train: An Examination of the Connection Between the Popularity of the First Name Layne and Democratic Presidential Votes in Colorado

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enthralling territory of the relationship between a name and political tendencies. Using data curated from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team aimed to unravel the enigma surrounding the prominence of the first name Layne and its potential influence on Colorado's preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Our findings reveal a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8559841 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1976 to 2020. While the data suggests a discernible association, we cannot help but wonder if the Layne train might have had an express stop in Colorado during elections, leading to this notable correlation. Further investigation into the allure and charisma associated with the name Layne may provide insights into its impact on political affinities, adding an amusing layer to the tapestry of electoral dynamics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between individuals' names and their behavioral, social, and even political inclinations has long been a subject of fascination. From "Napoleon complex" to "Karen memes," the association between nomenclature and characteristics has permeated popular culture and academic research alike. In this study, we explore the captivating nexus of the popularity of the first name Layne and its potential influence on votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in the diverse and politically engaging state of Colorado.
While one may ponder if the popular phrase "All aboard the Layne train" inspired this investigation, our research aims to dispassionately unearth any substantive connections between the name Layne and political preferences. Past studies have examined similar phenomena with other names, from the impact of "Bob" on barbecue consumption to the correlation of "Sarah" with voting patterns in states with picturesque autumn foliage. Both amusing and thought-provoking, these inquiries attest to the multifaceted nature of human psychology and societal dynamics.
The state of Colorado, with its blend of urban and rural communities, its majestic peaks, and its penchant for independent thought, forms an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The interplay between the Laynes and democratic votes in Colorado will offer an illuminating case study in the realm of socio-political nomenclature dynamics. Our analysis will endeavor to shed light on this notable correlation and examine potential underlying factors that may contribute to this peculiar association.
As we delve into the empirical evidence and statistical models, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly expedition that combines empirical rigor with a touch of whimsy. We anticipate that our findings will not only contribute to the literature on name-based influence but also provide a lighthearted glimpse into the curiosities of electoral dynamics. With bated breath and statistical software at the ready, let us embark on this endeavor to decipher the Layne train's impact on the political landscape in the colorful state of Colorado.

[[RESULTS]]
Through our analysis of data spanning from 1976 to 2020, a compelling correlation emerged between the popularity of the first name Layne and the votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado. Our statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8559841, indicating a strong positive relationship between the variables. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.7327088, suggesting that approximately 73% of the variation in Democratic votes can be explained by the popularity of the name Layne. With a p-value less than 0.01, our findings not only indicate statistical significance but also prompt us to envision a train of Laynes making a significant impact on the political landscape of Colorado.
In Figure 1, a scatterplot visually encapsulates the robust association between the frequency of the name Layne and Democratic votes in Colorado, leaving little room for doubt regarding the correlation. This scatterplot, akin to a snapshot of Laynes boarding the train to Democratic support, vividly illustrates the striking connection we've uncovered.
It is intriguing to note that while the causality remains beyond the scope of this study, the data provides a compelling portrayal of the Layne train's journey through Colorado's political landscape. One can't help but entertain the playful notion of Laynes wielding an unforeseen influence on the state's electoral inclinations, much like a whimsical character in a political fairy tale.
These results not only add a touch of mirth to the serious business of political analysis but also underscore the potential impact of an individual's nomenclature on their affiliations and electoral conduct. The Layne train, it seems, has left an indelible mark on the colorful state of Colorado, winding its way through the political terrain in a manner that beckons further exploration and jovial contemplation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has unveiled a captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Layne and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado. The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value affirm a substantial relationship, suggesting that the Layne train may have wielded an intriguing influence on Colorado's political dynamics. While the causal mechanisms remain enigmatic, the statistical significance of our findings solidifies the association and beckons further inquiry.

The whimsical notion of Laynes galvanizing Democratic support in Colorado adds an amusing layer to the intricate tapestry of electoral dynamics. Perhaps the Layne train made numerous whistle-stops in the Centennial State, leaving an imprint on its political landscape that tickles the imagination. This peculiar association not only piques scholarly curiosity but also invites a touch of humor into the realm of political analysis.

The unseen impact of a name on political affiliations, akin to a surreptitious character in an electoral saga, amplifies the perennial allure of human psychology and societal dynamics. However, despite the allure, the Layne train's mystique is best left as a lighthearted enigma, sparing us from overanalyzing the whimsy.

Hence, we assert, with a wink and a nod, that further research into the Layne train's escapades in Colorado's political sphere is unnecessary. This peculiar correlation stands as a delightful anomaly that adds a jovial dash of amusement to the otherwise serious terrain of electoral studies.

In the immortal words of Layne Staley, "I'm the man in the box, the one who votes Democrat in Colorado!" With these findings, we acknowledge the irresistible charm of the Layne train but bid adieu to this line of inquiry, allowing it to chug along in the annals of scholarly fascination.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Layne Train: An Examination of the Connection Between the Popularity of the First Name Layne and Democratic Presidential Votes in Colorado. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Nameology and Political Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Layne Train: An Examination of the Connection Between the Popularity of the First Name Layne and Democratic Presidential Votes in Colorado. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Name-Based Political Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Layne Train: An Examination of the Connection Between the Popularity of the First Name Layne and Democratic Presidential Votes in Colorado with an abstract of This study delves into the enthralling territory of the relationship between a name and political tendencies. Using data curated from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team aimed to unravel the enigma surrounding the prominence of the first name Layne and its potential influence on Colorado's preferences for the Democrat Presidential candidate. Our findings reveal a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8559841 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years from 1976 to 2020. While the data suggests a discernible association, we cannot help but wonder if the Layne train might have had an express stop in Colorado during elections, leading to this notable correlation. Further investigation into the allure and charisma associated with the name Layne may provide insights into its impact on political affinities, adding an amusing layer to the tapestry of electoral dynamics.

ChatGPT:

"first name Layne, popularity, Democratic Presidential Votes, Colorado, correlation coefficient, US Social Security Administration data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, political tendencies, influence, electoral dynamics, name influence, political affinities, Layne train, Colorado elections"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Layne
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Layne
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Layne

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Colorado
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado

Correlation r = 0.8559841 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7327088 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Layne) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00038. 0.0003811605773460510000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.038% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,624 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Layne (Babies born)8072112103147336308429474512413672
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado (Percentage of votes)42.609931.0735.122945.282440.12844.426542.393547.037853.660251.492248.15755.0111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called β€œdata dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([80,72,112,103,147,336,308,429,474,512,413,672,])
array_2 = np.array([42.6099,31.07,35.1229,45.2824,40.128,44.4265,42.3935,47.0378,53.6602,51.4922,48.157,55.0111,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Layne"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Colorado"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 5632 · Black Variable ID: 3176 · Red Variable ID: 26064
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0