about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,631 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska decreases, there are fewer people to engage in intense discussions about government structure and voting systems. This leads to a statewide lack of interest in niche topics, including the intricacies of electoral colleges and proportional representation. Without the academic influence to appreciate the geeky content, Nebraskan viewers slowly drift towards more mainstream video titles, causing a significant decrease in the overall geekiness level of CGP Grey YouTube videos. It's a politically influenced domino effect that even a gerrymandered explanation couldn't fully map out.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a cozy university classroom in Nebraska where a group of political science teachers engages in a lively discussion about government structures and voting systems. The room is filled with geeky enthusiasm, surrounded by stacks of textbooks and charts. Outside the classroom, a screen displays CGP Grey's YouTube channel with titles that reflect the intricate topics being discussed. As the number of political science teachers decreases, the classroom slowly empties, and the academic fervor diminishes. The YouTube screen shows a shift in video titles to more mainstream topics, reflecting the statewide decline in geeky content. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: High-tech Pop art Celtic art Cybernetic art Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska, in the following situation: As the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska decreases, there are fewer people to engage in intense discussions about government structure and voting systems. This leads to a statewide lack of interest in niche topics, including the intricacies of electoral colleges and proportional representation. Without the academic influence to appreciate the geeky content, Nebraskan viewers slowly drift towards more mainstream video titles, causing a significant decrease in the overall geekiness level of CGP Grey YouTube videos. It's a politically influenced domino effect that even a gerrymandered explanation couldn't fully map out.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy university classroom in Nebraska, a group of political science teachers engages in a lively discussion about government structures and voting systems. Their intense academic debates fill the room with geeky enthusiasm, surrounded by stacks of textbooks and charts. Meanwhile, outside the classroom, a screen displays CGP Grey's YouTube channel with titles that reflect the intricate topics being discussed. However, as the number of political science teachers decreases, the classroom slowly empties, and the academic fervor diminishes. Eventually, the YouTube screen shows a shift in video titles to more mainstream topics, reflecting the statewide decline in geeky content.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy university classroom in Nebraska, a group of political science teachers engages in a lively discussion about government structures and voting systems. Their intense academic debates fill the room with geeky enthusiasm, surrounded by stacks of textbooks and charts. Meanwhile, outside the classroom, a screen displays CGP Grey's YouTube channel with titles that reflect the intricate topics being discussed. However, as the number of political science teachers decreases, the classroom slowly empties, and the academic fervor diminishes. Eventually, the YouTube screen shows a shift in video titles to more mainstream topics, reflecting the statewide decline in geeky content. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a cozy university classroom in Nebraska where a group of political science teachers engages in a lively discussion about government structures and voting systems. The room is filled with geeky enthusiasm, surrounded by stacks of textbooks and charts. Outside the classroom, a screen displays CGP Grey's YouTube channel with titles that reflect the intricate topics being discussed. As the number of political science teachers decreases, the classroom slowly empties, and the academic fervor diminishes. The YouTube screen shows a shift in video titles to more mainstream topics, reflecting the statewide decline in geeky content.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are caused The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Grey Matter to Political Science: Unraveling the Geeky Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and University Professors in Nebraska

The Journal of Quirky Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9057922 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Grey Matter to Political Science: Unraveling the Geeky Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and University Professors in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the results of a quantitative study investigating the seemingly incongruent links between the geeky video titles of prominent YouTuber CGP Grey and the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of CGP Grey's video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to shed light on this quirky correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9057922 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2019, demonstrating a remarkably robust relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary studies, highlighting the unexpected ways in which popular culture and academia can intersect. While the implications of our findings may seem, well, grey, they underscore the importance of exploring unconventional avenues in research and maintaining a sense of humor in academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Grey Matter to Political Science: Unraveling the Geeky Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and University Professors in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the results of a quantitative study investigating the seemingly incongruent links between the geeky video titles of prominent YouTuber CGP Grey and the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of CGP Grey's video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to shed light on this quirky correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9057922 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2019, demonstrating a remarkably robust relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary studies, highlighting the unexpected ways in which popular culture and academia can intersect. While the implications of our findings may seem, well, grey, they underscore the importance of exploring unconventional avenues in research and maintaining a sense of humor in academia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of academia, where conventional wisdom reigns supreme, it is rare to stumble upon correlations that defy logic and reason, much like a mind-bending paradox from a sci-fi movie or an unexpected plot twist in a mystery novel. Yet, as the enigmatic CGP Grey would surely appreciate, when one delves into the eccentric domain of YouTube video titles and the geographical dispersion of political science educators, a curious connection emerges, raising eyebrows and prompting ponderous chin-stroking.

With more than a mere touch of a scholarly whimsy, the present study embarks on a quest to traverse this intriguing terrain, where the digital realm of educational content collides with the concrete realities of pedagogical practice in the heartland of America. To demystify this peculiar pairing, we employ sophisticated statistical analysis, channeling the versatile power of artificial intelligence to sift through the abundant data on CGP Grey video titles and the labor market information on educators in the state of Nebraska.

Venturing beyond the confines of traditional disciplinary boundaries, this investigation paves the way for a harmonious union of the playful ambiance of popular culture and the venerable halls of academia. While the unorthodox nature of our inquiry may raise more than a few eyebrows among the establishment, it remains our steadfast belief that academic inquiry, much like a grand performance, can benefit from the occasional comedic twist and turn.

So, with our tongues firmly planted in cheek, we embark on this intellectual escapade, aiming to uncover the intricate threads that weave together the mysterious semiotics of CGP Grey video titles and the professional fabric of political science educators in Nebraska. Let the quest for knowledge and humor commence!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Grey Matter to Political Science: Unraveling the Geeky Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and University Professors in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the results of a quantitative study investigating the seemingly incongruent links between the geeky video titles of prominent YouTuber CGP Grey and the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of CGP Grey's video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to shed light on this quirky correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9057922 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2019, demonstrating a remarkably robust relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary studies, highlighting the unexpected ways in which popular culture and academia can intersect. While the implications of our findings may seem, well, grey, they underscore the importance of exploring unconventional avenues in research and maintaining a sense of humor in academia.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academia, where conventional wisdom reigns supreme, it is rare to stumble upon correlations that defy logic and reason, much like a mind-bending paradox from a sci-fi movie or an unexpected plot twist in a mystery novel. Yet, as the enigmatic CGP Grey would surely appreciate, when one delves into the eccentric domain of YouTube video titles and the geographical dispersion of political science educators, a curious connection emerges, raising eyebrows and prompting ponderous chin-stroking.
With more than a mere touch of a scholarly whimsy, the present study embarks on a quest to traverse this intriguing terrain, where the digital realm of educational content collides with the concrete realities of pedagogical practice in the heartland of America. To demystify this peculiar pairing, we employ sophisticated statistical analysis, channeling the versatile power of artificial intelligence to sift through the abundant data on CGP Grey video titles and the labor market information on educators in the state of Nebraska.
Venturing beyond the confines of traditional disciplinary boundaries, this investigation paves the way for a harmonious union of the playful ambiance of popular culture and the venerable halls of academia. While the unorthodox nature of our inquiry may raise more than a few eyebrows among the establishment, it remains our steadfast belief that academic inquiry, much like a grand performance, can benefit from the occasional comedic twist and turn.
So, with our tongues firmly planted in cheek, we embark on this intellectual escapade, aiming to uncover the intricate threads that weave together the mysterious semiotics of CGP Grey video titles and the professional fabric of political science educators in Nebraska. Let the quest for knowledge and humor commence!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected and unconventional paths, akin to a rollercoaster ride through the labyrinth of academia, complete with hairpin turns and sudden drops. In the context of our investigation into the correlation between the geeky video titles of CGP Grey and the number of political science professors in Nebraska, existing literature has provided valuable insights, albeit with the occasional surprising detour.

A foundational study in this area is that of Smith et al. (2016), who conducted a comprehensive analysis of YouTube content and its impact on viewers' perceptions of educational material. Their findings underscore the significance of digital media in shaping public discourse, a notion that resonates with our examination of CGP Grey's captivating video titles.

Moreover, Doe and Jones (2018) observed a curious phenomenon in their research on the influence of pop culture references on educational paradigms, highlighting the subtle ways in which popular media can seep into the fabric of formal education. This observation echoes our quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between the playful allure of YouTube video titles and the professional landscape of political science academia in Nebraska.

Transitioning from scholarly works to the realm of non-fiction literature, the seminal work "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a compelling narrative on uncovering hidden correlations in seemingly disparate domains, urging readers to adopt an unconventional lens when approaching intellectual inquiry. As we navigate the uncharted waters of nerdy YouTube titles and academic demographics, the spirit of "Freakonomics" serves as a guiding beacon, encouraging us to embrace the unexpected and embrace the quirkiness of our findings.

In the realm of fiction, the timeless classic "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll provides a whimsical analogy to our quest for patterns in seemingly absurd connections. Just as Alice tumbled down the rabbit hole into a world of surreal wonders, our exploration of the relationship between CGP Grey's video titles and political science educators in Nebraska elicits a comparable sense of bewildering curiosity and delightful perplexity.

Beyond the written word, pop culture offerings such as "The Simpsons" and "SpongeBob SquarePants" serve as lighthearted stimuli for our research, infusing an element of whimsy and levity into the otherwise serious pursuit of knowledge. Amidst the feverish analysis of data and statistical models, a well-timed dose of animated humor reminds us to approach our findings with a healthy measure of mirth and playfulness.

Thus, as we wade through the labyrinthine corridors of scholarly literature and eclectic cultural references, we are reminded of the idiosyncratic nature of academic inquiry, where the fusion of serious research and lighthearted musings yields an intellectually delightful concoction. In the spirit of CGP Grey's quirky video titles, we press forward with an intrepid spirit, ready to unearth the unexpected in the most unlikely of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2011 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Grey Matter to Political Science: Unraveling the Geeky Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and University Professors in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the results of a quantitative study investigating the seemingly incongruent links between the geeky video titles of prominent YouTuber CGP Grey and the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of CGP Grey's video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to shed light on this quirky correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9057922 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2019, demonstrating a remarkably robust relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary studies, highlighting the unexpected ways in which popular culture and academia can intersect. While the implications of our findings may seem, well, grey, they underscore the importance of exploring unconventional avenues in research and maintaining a sense of humor in academia.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academia, where conventional wisdom reigns supreme, it is rare to stumble upon correlations that defy logic and reason, much like a mind-bending paradox from a sci-fi movie or an unexpected plot twist in a mystery novel. Yet, as the enigmatic CGP Grey would surely appreciate, when one delves into the eccentric domain of YouTube video titles and the geographical dispersion of political science educators, a curious connection emerges, raising eyebrows and prompting ponderous chin-stroking.
With more than a mere touch of a scholarly whimsy, the present study embarks on a quest to traverse this intriguing terrain, where the digital realm of educational content collides with the concrete realities of pedagogical practice in the heartland of America. To demystify this peculiar pairing, we employ sophisticated statistical analysis, channeling the versatile power of artificial intelligence to sift through the abundant data on CGP Grey video titles and the labor market information on educators in the state of Nebraska.
Venturing beyond the confines of traditional disciplinary boundaries, this investigation paves the way for a harmonious union of the playful ambiance of popular culture and the venerable halls of academia. While the unorthodox nature of our inquiry may raise more than a few eyebrows among the establishment, it remains our steadfast belief that academic inquiry, much like a grand performance, can benefit from the occasional comedic twist and turn.
So, with our tongues firmly planted in cheek, we embark on this intellectual escapade, aiming to uncover the intricate threads that weave together the mysterious semiotics of CGP Grey video titles and the professional fabric of political science educators in Nebraska. Let the quest for knowledge and humor commence!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic bond between the geeky video titles of CGP Grey and the number of political science professors in the state of Nebraska, we combined an eclectic mix of research methodologies and data sources. Harnessing the power of AI analysis and labor market statistics, we embarked on an unconventional journey through the digital and academic landscapes to shed light on this curious correlation.

In pursuit of the geeky essence underlying CGP Grey's video titles, we employed advanced natural language processing algorithms to meticulously dissect and categorize the linguistic quirks and thematic nuances characteristic of his content. Through the extraction of keywords, semantic analysis, and sentiment detection, we sought to distill the geeky essence that permeates his intellectually stimulating videos. Like discerning sommeliers of scholarly wit, we meticulously identified and quantified the levels of geekiness embedded within each title, recognizing that the elusive nature of geekdom necessitated a nuanced approach.

Simultaneously, our investigation delved into the realm of academic labor statistics, with a particular focus on the state of Nebraska. Poring over the Bureau of Labor Statistics data spanning the years 2011 to 2019, we meticulously tabulated the number of political science teachers in various educational institutions across the Cornhusker State. As the data unfurled before us like a captivating narrative, we navigated the statistical landscape with a discerning eye, mindful of the unique academic ecosystem that forms the backdrop of Nebraska's educational tapestry.

Upon harmonizing the datasets, we embarked on a statistical odyssey, deploying a sophisticated array of analytical techniques to uncover patterns and correlations that transcended the boundaries of conventional wisdom. Utilizing robust regression models, correlation analyses, and time series evaluations, we navigated the treacherous terrain of quantitative inquiry, determined to unearth the subtle connections that defied traditional academic dogma.

In recognition of the intricate interplay between the whimsical world of YouTube and the esteemed halls of academia, we embraced the broader implications of our methodology. While the unorthodox nature of our inquiry may raise more than a few quizzical eyebrows, it is our humble contention that scholarly endeavors are enriched by the occasional sprinkle of geeky charm and a dash of academic levity. Thus, armed with statistical prowess and a zest for unearthing hidden connections, we ventured forth to unveil the intriguing concordance between CGP Grey's geeky titles and the academic vocation of political science educators in Nebraska.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2011 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.9057922, r-squared of 0.8204595, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Grey Matter to Political Science: Unraveling the Geeky Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and University Professors in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the results of a quantitative study investigating the seemingly incongruent links between the geeky video titles of prominent YouTuber CGP Grey and the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of CGP Grey's video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to shed light on this quirky correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9057922 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2019, demonstrating a remarkably robust relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary studies, highlighting the unexpected ways in which popular culture and academia can intersect. While the implications of our findings may seem, well, grey, they underscore the importance of exploring unconventional avenues in research and maintaining a sense of humor in academia.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of academia, where conventional wisdom reigns supreme, it is rare to stumble upon correlations that defy logic and reason, much like a mind-bending paradox from a sci-fi movie or an unexpected plot twist in a mystery novel. Yet, as the enigmatic CGP Grey would surely appreciate, when one delves into the eccentric domain of YouTube video titles and the geographical dispersion of political science educators, a curious connection emerges, raising eyebrows and prompting ponderous chin-stroking.
With more than a mere touch of a scholarly whimsy, the present study embarks on a quest to traverse this intriguing terrain, where the digital realm of educational content collides with the concrete realities of pedagogical practice in the heartland of America. To demystify this peculiar pairing, we employ sophisticated statistical analysis, channeling the versatile power of artificial intelligence to sift through the abundant data on CGP Grey video titles and the labor market information on educators in the state of Nebraska.
Venturing beyond the confines of traditional disciplinary boundaries, this investigation paves the way for a harmonious union of the playful ambiance of popular culture and the venerable halls of academia. While the unorthodox nature of our inquiry may raise more than a few eyebrows among the establishment, it remains our steadfast belief that academic inquiry, much like a grand performance, can benefit from the occasional comedic twist and turn.
So, with our tongues firmly planted in cheek, we embark on this intellectual escapade, aiming to uncover the intricate threads that weave together the mysterious semiotics of CGP Grey video titles and the professional fabric of political science educators in Nebraska. Let the quest for knowledge and humor commence!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our examination of the data yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the geeky allure of CGP Grey's YouTube video titles and the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Specifically, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9057922, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The r-squared value of 0.8204595 further reinforced the strength of this association, explaining a substantial proportion of the variance in the number of political science teachers as a function of the geekiness of CGP Grey's video titles.

Notably, our findings bear statistical significance at the p < 0.01 level, underscoring the reliability and validity of the observed relationship. In simpler terms, the probability of this correlation occurring by chance is less than 1%, signaling a high degree of confidence in the meaningful link between the variables.

Furthermore, to visually encapsulate the compelling association uncovered by our analysis, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot highlighting the strong correlation between the geeky charm of CGP Grey's video titles and the presence of political science educators in the Cornhusker State.

In essence, our study provocatively unveils the unexpected intertwining of internet culture and academic pursuits, showcasing the convoluted dance of geeky fascination and educational vocations. These findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the often staid realm of academia but also serve as a playful reminder of the multifaceted nature of scholarly inquiry.

In the end, our results reflect the intriguing and, dare we say, "grey" nature of knowledge production, emphasizing the peculiar yet enthralling convergence of pop culture phenomena and scholarly endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"From Grey Matter to Political Science: Unraveling the Geeky Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and University Professors in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the results of a quantitative study investigating the seemingly incongruent links between the geeky video titles of prominent YouTuber CGP Grey and the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of CGP Grey's video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to shed light on this quirky correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9057922 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2019, demonstrating a remarkably robust relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary studies, highlighting the unexpected ways in which popular culture and academia can intersect. While the implications of our findings may seem, well, grey, they underscore the importance of exploring unconventional avenues in research and maintaining a sense of humor in academia.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected and unconventional paths, akin to a rollercoaster ride through the labyrinth of academia, complete with hairpin turns and sudden drops. In the context of our investigation into the correlation between the geeky video titles of CGP Grey and the number of political science professors in Nebraska, existing literature has provided valuable insights, albeit with the occasional surprising detour.
A foundational study in this area is that of Smith et al. (2016), who conducted a comprehensive analysis of YouTube content and its impact on viewers' perceptions of educational material. Their findings underscore the significance of digital media in shaping public discourse, a notion that resonates with our examination of CGP Grey's captivating video titles.
Moreover, Doe and Jones (2018) observed a curious phenomenon in their research on the influence of pop culture references on educational paradigms, highlighting the subtle ways in which popular media can seep into the fabric of formal education. This observation echoes our quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between the playful allure of YouTube video titles and the professional landscape of political science academia in Nebraska.
Transitioning from scholarly works to the realm of non-fiction literature, the seminal work "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a compelling narrative on uncovering hidden correlations in seemingly disparate domains, urging readers to adopt an unconventional lens when approaching intellectual inquiry. As we navigate the uncharted waters of nerdy YouTube titles and academic demographics, the spirit of "Freakonomics" serves as a guiding beacon, encouraging us to embrace the unexpected and embrace the quirkiness of our findings.
In the realm of fiction, the timeless classic "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll provides a whimsical analogy to our quest for patterns in seemingly absurd connections. Just as Alice tumbled down the rabbit hole into a world of surreal wonders, our exploration of the relationship between CGP Grey's video titles and political science educators in Nebraska elicits a comparable sense of bewildering curiosity and delightful perplexity.
Beyond the written word, pop culture offerings such as "The Simpsons" and "SpongeBob SquarePants" serve as lighthearted stimuli for our research, infusing an element of whimsy and levity into the otherwise serious pursuit of knowledge. Amidst the feverish analysis of data and statistical models, a well-timed dose of animated humor reminds us to approach our findings with a healthy measure of mirth and playfulness.
Thus, as we wade through the labyrinthine corridors of scholarly literature and eclectic cultural references, we are reminded of the idiosyncratic nature of academic inquiry, where the fusion of serious research and lighthearted musings yields an intellectually delightful concoction. In the spirit of CGP Grey's quirky video titles, we press forward with an intrepid spirit, ready to unearth the unexpected in the most unlikely of places.

[[RESULTS]]
Our examination of the data yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the geeky allure of CGP Grey's YouTube video titles and the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Specifically, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9057922, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The r-squared value of 0.8204595 further reinforced the strength of this association, explaining a substantial proportion of the variance in the number of political science teachers as a function of the geekiness of CGP Grey's video titles.
Notably, our findings bear statistical significance at the p < 0.01 level, underscoring the reliability and validity of the observed relationship. In simpler terms, the probability of this correlation occurring by chance is less than 1%, signaling a high degree of confidence in the meaningful link between the variables.
Furthermore, to visually encapsulate the compelling association uncovered by our analysis, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot highlighting the strong correlation between the geeky charm of CGP Grey's video titles and the presence of political science educators in the Cornhusker State.
In essence, our study provocatively unveils the unexpected intertwining of internet culture and academic pursuits, showcasing the convoluted dance of geeky fascination and educational vocations. These findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the often staid realm of academia but also serve as a playful reminder of the multifaceted nature of scholarly inquiry.
In the end, our results reflect the intriguing and, dare we say, "grey" nature of knowledge production, emphasizing the peculiar yet enthralling convergence of pop culture phenomena and scholarly endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study are as surprising as a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat - or perhaps a political scientist out of a YouTube video! Our findings not only uphold the quirky musings and seemingly whimsical conjectures from the literature review, but they also open a Pandora's box of questions about the interplay between digital media and academic landscapes. The striking correlation we uncovered serves as a poignant reminder that beneath the veneer of seriousness, academia harbors its fair share of delightful and unexpected phenomena.

It appears that the allure of CGP Grey's geeky video titles exerts a magnetic pull on the academic realm, much like a siren's call luring unsuspecting sailors toward the rocky shoals – only in this case, the sailors are political science professors and the shoals are, well, Nebraska. Our results align with Smith et al. (2016) in emphasizing the impact of digital media on educational perceptions, suggesting that the captivating nature of YouTube content may indeed permeate the professional fabric of academia. Similarly, the influence of pop culture references on educational paradigms, as noted by Doe and Jones (2018), finds validation in our study, underscoring the nuanced ways in which popular media interfaces with formal education, albeit in an unexpected and delightfully geeky manner.

In essence, our findings echo the sentiments embodied in "Freakonomics" and "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland," as well as the lighthearted stimuli of "The Simpsons" and "SpongeBob SquarePants" – the unearthing of hidden correlations and the whimsical pursuit of intellectual curiosities in the most unlikely of places. It is as if the academic landscape of Nebraska has found itself in a real-life episode of a sitcom, complete with pleasantly surprising plot twists and unexpected character developments.

While the relationship between CGP Grey's video titles and the number of political science professors in Nebraska may seem like an odd couple, our results leave us with more questions than answers. What is it about these cheeky titles that resonates so deeply with the academic milieu? Are political science professors secretly harboring an affinity for quirky YouTube content, or is there a clandestine network of CGP Grey enthusiasts hidden in the Cornhusker State? As we ponder these playful, albeit pressing, queries, it becomes evident that the intersection of internet culture and academic vocations warrants further exploration – for in this seemingly incongruous blend lies a realm of uncharted and delightfully eccentric discoveries.

In summary, our study not only demonstrates the robust correlation between the geeky charm of CGP Grey's video titles and the number of political science educators in Nebraska but also sets the stage for a captivating journey into the whimsical hinterlands of academia, where serious research and playful musings intersect in entertaining and unexpected ways. Indeed, the grey areas of knowledge production continue to astound and beguile, underscoring the vibrant tapestry of intellectual pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Grey Matter to Political Science: Unraveling the Geeky Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and University Professors in Nebraska"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the results of a quantitative study investigating the seemingly incongruent links between the geeky video titles of prominent YouTuber CGP Grey and the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of CGP Grey's video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to shed light on this quirky correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9057922 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2019, demonstrating a remarkably robust relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary studies, highlighting the unexpected ways in which popular culture and academia can intersect. While the implications of our findings may seem, well, grey, they underscore the importance of exploring unconventional avenues in research and maintaining a sense of humor in academia.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of academia, where conventional wisdom reigns supreme, it is rare to stumble upon correlations that defy logic and reason, much like a mind-bending paradox from a sci-fi movie or an unexpected plot twist in a mystery novel. Yet, as the enigmatic CGP Grey would surely appreciate, when one delves into the eccentric domain of YouTube video titles and the geographical dispersion of political science educators, a curious connection emerges, raising eyebrows and prompting ponderous chin-stroking.
With more than a mere touch of a scholarly whimsy, the present study embarks on a quest to traverse this intriguing terrain, where the digital realm of educational content collides with the concrete realities of pedagogical practice in the heartland of America. To demystify this peculiar pairing, we employ sophisticated statistical analysis, channeling the versatile power of artificial intelligence to sift through the abundant data on CGP Grey video titles and the labor market information on educators in the state of Nebraska.
Venturing beyond the confines of traditional disciplinary boundaries, this investigation paves the way for a harmonious union of the playful ambiance of popular culture and the venerable halls of academia. While the unorthodox nature of our inquiry may raise more than a few eyebrows among the establishment, it remains our steadfast belief that academic inquiry, much like a grand performance, can benefit from the occasional comedic twist and turn.
So, with our tongues firmly planted in cheek, we embark on this intellectual escapade, aiming to uncover the intricate threads that weave together the mysterious semiotics of CGP Grey video titles and the professional fabric of political science educators in Nebraska. Let the quest for knowledge and humor commence!

[[RESULTS]]
Our examination of the data yielded a remarkably robust correlation between the geeky allure of CGP Grey's YouTube video titles and the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Specifically, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9057922, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The r-squared value of 0.8204595 further reinforced the strength of this association, explaining a substantial proportion of the variance in the number of political science teachers as a function of the geekiness of CGP Grey's video titles.
Notably, our findings bear statistical significance at the p < 0.01 level, underscoring the reliability and validity of the observed relationship. In simpler terms, the probability of this correlation occurring by chance is less than 1%, signaling a high degree of confidence in the meaningful link between the variables.
Furthermore, to visually encapsulate the compelling association uncovered by our analysis, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot highlighting the strong correlation between the geeky charm of CGP Grey's video titles and the presence of political science educators in the Cornhusker State.
In essence, our study provocatively unveils the unexpected intertwining of internet culture and academic pursuits, showcasing the convoluted dance of geeky fascination and educational vocations. These findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the often staid realm of academia but also serve as a playful reminder of the multifaceted nature of scholarly inquiry.
In the end, our results reflect the intriguing and, dare we say, "grey" nature of knowledge production, emphasizing the peculiar yet enthralling convergence of pop culture phenomena and scholarly endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has successfully unraveled the enigmatic connection between CGP Grey's quirky video titles and the presence of political science educators in the plains of Nebraska. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9057922, coupled with a significance level of p < 0.01, paints a compelling picture of the unexpected bond between internet nerdiness and academic pursuits. It appears that the grey matter of CGP Grey's titles has a peculiar pull on the academic landscape, much like a Möbius strip of scholarly curiosity.

It is evident that the interplay between digital fascination and professional vocations knows no bounds, transcending the conventional boundaries of academic inquiry with a provocative nod to the whimsical. As we wrap up this peculiar, yet oddly delightful investigation, we are left with a sense of wonder at the intricate dance of statistical significance and cerebral amusement.

In the grand tapestry of academic inquiry, our findings stand as a lighthearted testament to the ever-entertaining nuances of knowledge production. As we bid adieu to this unorthodox expedition, we declare with a touch of whimsy and a dash of certainty that no further research is needed in this curious domain. The grey matter has spoken, and its enigmatic wit shall linger in the annals of scholarly musings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Grey Matter to Political Science: Unraveling the Geeky Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and University Professors in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Grey Matter to Political Science: Unraveling the Geeky Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and University Professors in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Whimsical Research and Exploration


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Grey Matter to Political Science: Unraveling the Geeky Connection Between CGP Grey Video Titles and University Professors in Nebraska with an abstract of This paper presents the results of a quantitative study investigating the seemingly incongruent links between the geeky video titles of prominent YouTuber CGP Grey and the number of university political science teachers in Nebraska. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of CGP Grey's video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to shed light on this quirky correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9057922 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2019, demonstrating a remarkably robust relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary studies, highlighting the unexpected ways in which popular culture and academia can intersect. While the implications of our findings may seem, well, grey, they underscore the importance of exploring unconventional avenues in research and maintaining a sense of humor in academia.

ChatGPT:

CGP Grey, political science teachers, Nebraska, quantitative study, AI analysis, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, interdisciplinary studies, academia, popular culture, research, unconventional avenues, humor in academia

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are

The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of political science teachers, postsecondary in Nebraska
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska

Correlation r = 0.9057922 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8204595 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are) over the 9 years from 2011 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00077. 0.0007698001447362114000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.077% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,299 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201120122013201420152016201720182019
How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are (Geeky score (out of 10))5.22224.63644.72735.22224.66676.36366.554.4615
The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska (Laborers)80808090901101309080




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.2222,4.6364,4.7273,5.2222,4.6667,6.3636,6.5,5,4.4615,])
array_2 = np.array([80,80,80,90,90,110,130,90,80,])
array_1_name = "How geeky CGP Grey YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of university political science teachers in Nebraska"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 5631 · Black Variable ID: 25901 · Red Variable ID: 10898
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0