about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,479 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and the second variable is Gasoline pumped in Croatia.  The chart goes from 1992 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Unbeknownst to many, air pollution particles from Seneca, South Carolina have developed a strong affinity for Croatian gasoline. It seems that the smog from Seneca has been sending out a magnetic invitation for the gasoline molecules to come over for a dirty fuel party in Croatia. This unexpected international love connection has led to a rise in gasoline pumped in Croatia, proving that when it comes to pollution, the world of science can be quite the gas! It's a case of Seneca smog creating a fueling frenzy in Croatia, as the pollutants play matchmaker in the global gas-guzzling community. Who knew that the secret to boosting Croatian gasoline sales lies in the hazy air of Seneca?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a hazy sky over a rural town, with pollution particles swirling in the atmosphere. In the distance, depict a gas station in Croatia, surrounded by a line of cars as drivers pump gasoline into their vehicles. The smog from Seneca should appear to reach out and mix with the gasoline molecules in a captivating way, creating an unexpected connection between the two locations. The visual should convey the surprising global love story of pollution inadvertently boosting gasoline sales, while maintaining a realistic and evocative quality. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Gasoline pumped in Croatia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Art nouveau Cybernetic art Realistic Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Gasoline pumped in Croatia, in the following situation: Unbeknownst to many, air pollution particles from Seneca, South Carolina have developed a strong affinity for Croatian gasoline. It seems that the smog from Seneca has been sending out a magnetic invitation for the gasoline molecules to come over for a dirty fuel party in Croatia. This unexpected international love connection has led to a rise in gasoline pumped in Croatia, proving that when it comes to pollution, the world of science can be quite the gas! It's a case of Seneca smog creating a fueling frenzy in Croatia, as the pollutants play matchmaker in the global gas-guzzling community. Who knew that the secret to boosting Croatian gasoline sales lies in the hazy air of Seneca?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a hazy sky above Seneca, South Carolina, where pollution particles swirl in the air. In the distance, a line of cars snakes around a gas station in Croatia, as drivers eagerly pump gasoline into their vehicles. Unseen by the drivers, the smog from Seneca seems to reach out, forming a magnetic connection with the gasoline molecules, as if calling them to join in a dirty fuel party. It's a surprising global love story, with Seneca's pollution inadvertently boosting gasoline sales in Croatia.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a hazy sky above Seneca, South Carolina, where pollution particles swirl in the air. In the distance, a line of cars snakes around a gas station in Croatia, as drivers eagerly pump gasoline into their vehicles. Unseen by the drivers, the smog from Seneca seems to reach out, forming a magnetic connection with the gasoline molecules, as if calling them to join in a dirty fuel party. It's a surprising global love story, with Seneca's pollution inadvertently boosting gasoline sales in Croatia. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a hazy sky over a rural town, with pollution particles swirling in the atmosphere. In the distance, depict a gas station in Croatia, surrounded by a line of cars as drivers pump gasoline into their vehicles. The smog from Seneca should appear to reach out and mix with the gasoline molecules in a captivating way, creating an unexpected connection between the two locations. The visual should convey the surprising global love story of pollution inadvertently boosting gasoline sales, while maintaining a realistic and evocative quality.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina positively influenced Gasoline pumped in Croatia. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Connecting Carolina's Air and Croatian Gasoline: A Curious Correlation

The Journal of Absurd Anthropological Associations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Gasoline pumped in Croatia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and p < 0.01 for 1992 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Carolina's Air and Croatian Gasoline: A Curious Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unveil the veiled link between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline consumption in the charming country of Croatia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period from 1992 to 2019, we have discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Though initial findings indicated an incongruous connection between these seemingly unrelated entities, further analysis revealed a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline commerce in Croatia. This correlation, while surprising, suggests a whimsical intertwining of environmental factors across continents. Further investigation into this peculiar relationship could lead to a shift in paradigms regarding the global dispersion of pollutants and their unexpected, yet undeniable, intercontinental connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Gasoline pumped in Croatia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Carolina's Air and Croatian Gasoline: A Curious Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unveil the veiled link between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline consumption in the charming country of Croatia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period from 1992 to 2019, we have discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Though initial findings indicated an incongruous connection between these seemingly unrelated entities, further analysis revealed a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline commerce in Croatia. This correlation, while surprising, suggests a whimsical intertwining of environmental factors across continents. Further investigation into this peculiar relationship could lead to a shift in paradigms regarding the global dispersion of pollutants and their unexpected, yet undeniable, intercontinental connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
As our inquisitive minds delve into the labyrinth of interconnected phenomena, we often stumble upon the most curious and unexpected correlations. The world of science and statistics is a treasure trove of surprises, and our current pursuit is no exception. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to unravel the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the consumption of gasoline in the enchanting land of Croatia. The quest for this correlation has taken us through the realm of data analysis, unveiling an unforeseen connection that stretches across continents and defies conventional wisdom.

Our exploration is fueled by the intriguing nature of these seemingly disparate variables, where the air quality in the quaint town of Seneca, South Carolina, harmonizes with the ebb and flow of gasoline commerce in the picturesque landscapes of Croatia. Embracing the spirit of scientific inquiry and a healthy dose of skepticism, we set out to scrutinize this enigmatic connection with rigor and mirth.

This study emerges from a blend of curiosity and statistical prowess, leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Our analysis encompasses a period spanning from 1992 to 2019, a temporal canvas on which the brushstrokes of correlation and causation intertwine in a dance of numerical intrigue. Among the symphony of statistical measures, a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, beckoning us to ponder the implications of this unexpected liaison.

While the initial foray into this inquiry raised eyebrows and elicited quizzical looks from our esteemed colleagues, our persistence in probing the labyrinth of data eventually unveiled a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca and the consumption of Croatian gasoline. This revelation, though unconventional, invites us to consider the delightful possibility of unseen threads weaving through the tapestry of global environmental impact.

Join us, dear reader, as we embark on a journey through the world of statistical marvels and delightful correlations. As we untangle the web of intercontinental connections, let us embrace the serendipitous discoveries that await, for in the world of science, even the most unconventional relationships can yield insights of surprising significance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Gasoline pumped in Croatia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Carolina's Air and Croatian Gasoline: A Curious Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unveil the veiled link between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline consumption in the charming country of Croatia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period from 1992 to 2019, we have discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Though initial findings indicated an incongruous connection between these seemingly unrelated entities, further analysis revealed a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline commerce in Croatia. This correlation, while surprising, suggests a whimsical intertwining of environmental factors across continents. Further investigation into this peculiar relationship could lead to a shift in paradigms regarding the global dispersion of pollutants and their unexpected, yet undeniable, intercontinental connections.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As our inquisitive minds delve into the labyrinth of interconnected phenomena, we often stumble upon the most curious and unexpected correlations. The world of science and statistics is a treasure trove of surprises, and our current pursuit is no exception. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to unravel the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the consumption of gasoline in the enchanting land of Croatia. The quest for this correlation has taken us through the realm of data analysis, unveiling an unforeseen connection that stretches across continents and defies conventional wisdom.
Our exploration is fueled by the intriguing nature of these seemingly disparate variables, where the air quality in the quaint town of Seneca, South Carolina, harmonizes with the ebb and flow of gasoline commerce in the picturesque landscapes of Croatia. Embracing the spirit of scientific inquiry and a healthy dose of skepticism, we set out to scrutinize this enigmatic connection with rigor and mirth.
This study emerges from a blend of curiosity and statistical prowess, leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Our analysis encompasses a period spanning from 1992 to 2019, a temporal canvas on which the brushstrokes of correlation and causation intertwine in a dance of numerical intrigue. Among the symphony of statistical measures, a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, beckoning us to ponder the implications of this unexpected liaison.
While the initial foray into this inquiry raised eyebrows and elicited quizzical looks from our esteemed colleagues, our persistence in probing the labyrinth of data eventually unveiled a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca and the consumption of Croatian gasoline. This revelation, though unconventional, invites us to consider the delightful possibility of unseen threads weaving through the tapestry of global environmental impact.
Join us, dear reader, as we embark on a journey through the world of statistical marvels and delightful correlations. As we untangle the web of intercontinental connections, let us embrace the serendipitous discoveries that await, for in the world of science, even the most unconventional relationships can yield insights of surprising significance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Interplay of Air Quality and Fuel Consumption: A Global Perspective," Smith et al. emphasize the intricate dance between environmental factors and gasoline utilization. Their findings shed light on the interconnected nature of air pollution and fuel consumption, hinting at a web of relationships that transcend geographical boundaries. Similarly, Doe's "Emissions and Energy: Unraveling the Tapestry of Air Quality" delves into the nuanced interconnections between pollutants and energy consumption, laying the groundwork for our inquiry into the unexpected link between Seneca's air quality and Croatia's gasoline usage.

Venturing into the realm of non-fiction, "Pollution Across Continents" by Jones provides a comprehensive overview of the global dispersion of pollutants, offering insights that resonate with our endeavor to unravel the cross-continental correlation between Seneca's air and Croatian gasoline. Additionally, "Energy Markets and Environmental Impact" by Greenleaf et al. offers a thought-provoking analysis of the ripple effects of fuel consumption on environmental parameters, provoking contemplation of the potential implications for our investigation.

On a lighter note, works of fiction such as "The Airborne Odyssey" by A. Readman and "Gasoline in the Mist" by E. Tankard, though not scientific treatises, evoke a sense of whimsy that aligns with the unexpected nature of our findings. Furthermore, the classic board game "Pollution Pandemonium" serves as a light-hearted reminder that even the most unforeseen connections can lead to a delightful unraveling of mysteries.

As we navigate through the scholarly landscape, we are summoned to ponder the intermingling of Seneca's air and Croatian gasoline with a blend of scholarly rigor and lighthearted curiosity. The juxtaposition of serious research and playful allusions invites us to savor the delightfully mysterious journey that lies ahead, where even the most unconventional correlations may hold unforeseen revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Gasoline pumped in Croatia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1992 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Carolina's Air and Croatian Gasoline: A Curious Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unveil the veiled link between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline consumption in the charming country of Croatia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period from 1992 to 2019, we have discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Though initial findings indicated an incongruous connection between these seemingly unrelated entities, further analysis revealed a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline commerce in Croatia. This correlation, while surprising, suggests a whimsical intertwining of environmental factors across continents. Further investigation into this peculiar relationship could lead to a shift in paradigms regarding the global dispersion of pollutants and their unexpected, yet undeniable, intercontinental connections.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As our inquisitive minds delve into the labyrinth of interconnected phenomena, we often stumble upon the most curious and unexpected correlations. The world of science and statistics is a treasure trove of surprises, and our current pursuit is no exception. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to unravel the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the consumption of gasoline in the enchanting land of Croatia. The quest for this correlation has taken us through the realm of data analysis, unveiling an unforeseen connection that stretches across continents and defies conventional wisdom.
Our exploration is fueled by the intriguing nature of these seemingly disparate variables, where the air quality in the quaint town of Seneca, South Carolina, harmonizes with the ebb and flow of gasoline commerce in the picturesque landscapes of Croatia. Embracing the spirit of scientific inquiry and a healthy dose of skepticism, we set out to scrutinize this enigmatic connection with rigor and mirth.
This study emerges from a blend of curiosity and statistical prowess, leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Our analysis encompasses a period spanning from 1992 to 2019, a temporal canvas on which the brushstrokes of correlation and causation intertwine in a dance of numerical intrigue. Among the symphony of statistical measures, a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, beckoning us to ponder the implications of this unexpected liaison.
While the initial foray into this inquiry raised eyebrows and elicited quizzical looks from our esteemed colleagues, our persistence in probing the labyrinth of data eventually unveiled a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca and the consumption of Croatian gasoline. This revelation, though unconventional, invites us to consider the delightful possibility of unseen threads weaving through the tapestry of global environmental impact.
Join us, dear reader, as we embark on a journey through the world of statistical marvels and delightful correlations. As we untangle the web of intercontinental connections, let us embrace the serendipitous discoveries that await, for in the world of science, even the most unconventional relationships can yield insights of surprising significance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on this whimsical expedition through the labyrinth of data, we employed an assortment of rigorous research methods, statistical analyses, and a healthy dollop of whimsy. Our data collection spanned the period from 1992 to 2019, eliciting a panoply of insights into the mysterious connection between Seneca’s air quality and the flow of Croatian gasoline.

We began by sifting through the vast expanse of electronic repositories, diligently combing through the virtual haystack of information to uncover the hidden needles of relevance. Marvelous as it may sound, the digital realm granted us access to a trove of treasure in the form of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration.

In our pursuit of this enigmatic correlation, we concocted a recipe of statistical analyses that would make even the most astute data connoisseur raise an eyebrow. Armed with a platter of correlations and regressions, we set out to entangle the complex web of data, meticulously inspecting each thread for the faintest hint of connection. Our exploration delved into the charming world of scatter plots and time series analyses, where the dance of data points unfolded like a lively soirée of statistical intrigue.

With formidable perseverance, we sought to uncover the subtle interplay between Seneca’s air quality and Croatian gasoline consumption, navigating through the intricacies of multivariable modeling and time series analyses. We meticulously examined the trends and patterns that emerged from this tango of data, embracing the whimsical nature of statistical exploration with a level of seriousness befitting the most lighthearted of endeavors.

Our statistical toolkit, with its arsenal of Pearson correlation coefficients and robust p-values, offered a delightful assortment of measures to illuminate the inquisitive minds of our inquiry. The methods employed danced with a jovial spirit, showcasing the inherent joy in unraveling the surprises that lay hidden within the folds of numerical data.

As we ventured forth in this fanciful escapade, we veiled our dedication to scientific inquiry with a sprinkle of mirth, knowing full well that the most curious of relationships often reveal themselves amid a backdrop of statistical revelry. The symphony of statistical analyses, laced with hints of jest, carried us through the ocean of data, guiding our quest to reveal the subtle connection between Seneca’s atmospheric nuances and the whims of Croatian gasoline commerce. And with a twinkle in our eyes, we invite you to traverse the terrain of our methodology, where rigor met whimsy in a delightful dance of discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Gasoline pumped in Croatia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1992 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.8650490, r-squared of 0.7483097, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Carolina's Air and Croatian Gasoline: A Curious Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unveil the veiled link between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline consumption in the charming country of Croatia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period from 1992 to 2019, we have discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Though initial findings indicated an incongruous connection between these seemingly unrelated entities, further analysis revealed a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline commerce in Croatia. This correlation, while surprising, suggests a whimsical intertwining of environmental factors across continents. Further investigation into this peculiar relationship could lead to a shift in paradigms regarding the global dispersion of pollutants and their unexpected, yet undeniable, intercontinental connections.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As our inquisitive minds delve into the labyrinth of interconnected phenomena, we often stumble upon the most curious and unexpected correlations. The world of science and statistics is a treasure trove of surprises, and our current pursuit is no exception. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to unravel the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the consumption of gasoline in the enchanting land of Croatia. The quest for this correlation has taken us through the realm of data analysis, unveiling an unforeseen connection that stretches across continents and defies conventional wisdom.
Our exploration is fueled by the intriguing nature of these seemingly disparate variables, where the air quality in the quaint town of Seneca, South Carolina, harmonizes with the ebb and flow of gasoline commerce in the picturesque landscapes of Croatia. Embracing the spirit of scientific inquiry and a healthy dose of skepticism, we set out to scrutinize this enigmatic connection with rigor and mirth.
This study emerges from a blend of curiosity and statistical prowess, leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Our analysis encompasses a period spanning from 1992 to 2019, a temporal canvas on which the brushstrokes of correlation and causation intertwine in a dance of numerical intrigue. Among the symphony of statistical measures, a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, beckoning us to ponder the implications of this unexpected liaison.
While the initial foray into this inquiry raised eyebrows and elicited quizzical looks from our esteemed colleagues, our persistence in probing the labyrinth of data eventually unveiled a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca and the consumption of Croatian gasoline. This revelation, though unconventional, invites us to consider the delightful possibility of unseen threads weaving through the tapestry of global environmental impact.
Join us, dear reader, as we embark on a journey through the world of statistical marvels and delightful correlations. As we untangle the web of intercontinental connections, let us embrace the serendipitous discoveries that await, for in the world of science, even the most unconventional relationships can yield insights of surprising significance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The endeavor to untangle the enigmatic correlation between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline consumption in Croatia has yielded noteworthy results. Our statistical analysis, akin to a detective's quest for clues, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.7483097 suggests that 74.83% of the variation in one variable can be explained by the other – a surprisingly strong association given the geographical and contextual disparities between the two regions.

The significance of this correlation was further emphasized by the p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is less than 1%. Such a p-value is rarer than a statistically significant unicorn roaming the realms of data analysis.

Additionally, our visual representation of this intriguing relationship, encapsulated in Fig. 1, portrays a scatterplot that tells a tale of its own. The clustering of data points along a clear trajectory reflects the harmonious dance between the air quality in Seneca and the patterns of gasoline usage in Croatia – a waltz of environmental intricacy that invites further contemplation.

In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on a captivating intercontinental connection that challenges conventional scientific boundaries. The discovery of a substantial correlation between air pollution in Seneca and gasoline consumption in Croatia not only raises eyebrows but also underscores the unpredictable nature of statistical exploration. This curious correlation serves as a testament to the unexpected marvels that await those who venture into the world of statistics and scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Gasoline pumped in Croatia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Connecting Carolina's Air and Croatian Gasoline: A Curious Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unveil the veiled link between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline consumption in the charming country of Croatia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period from 1992 to 2019, we have discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Though initial findings indicated an incongruous connection between these seemingly unrelated entities, further analysis revealed a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline commerce in Croatia. This correlation, while surprising, suggests a whimsical intertwining of environmental factors across continents. Further investigation into this peculiar relationship could lead to a shift in paradigms regarding the global dispersion of pollutants and their unexpected, yet undeniable, intercontinental connections.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Interplay of Air Quality and Fuel Consumption: A Global Perspective," Smith et al. emphasize the intricate dance between environmental factors and gasoline utilization. Their findings shed light on the interconnected nature of air pollution and fuel consumption, hinting at a web of relationships that transcend geographical boundaries. Similarly, Doe's "Emissions and Energy: Unraveling the Tapestry of Air Quality" delves into the nuanced interconnections between pollutants and energy consumption, laying the groundwork for our inquiry into the unexpected link between Seneca's air quality and Croatia's gasoline usage.
Venturing into the realm of non-fiction, "Pollution Across Continents" by Jones provides a comprehensive overview of the global dispersion of pollutants, offering insights that resonate with our endeavor to unravel the cross-continental correlation between Seneca's air and Croatian gasoline. Additionally, "Energy Markets and Environmental Impact" by Greenleaf et al. offers a thought-provoking analysis of the ripple effects of fuel consumption on environmental parameters, provoking contemplation of the potential implications for our investigation.
On a lighter note, works of fiction such as "The Airborne Odyssey" by A. Readman and "Gasoline in the Mist" by E. Tankard, though not scientific treatises, evoke a sense of whimsy that aligns with the unexpected nature of our findings. Furthermore, the classic board game "Pollution Pandemonium" serves as a light-hearted reminder that even the most unforeseen connections can lead to a delightful unraveling of mysteries.
As we navigate through the scholarly landscape, we are summoned to ponder the intermingling of Seneca's air and Croatian gasoline with a blend of scholarly rigor and lighthearted curiosity. The juxtaposition of serious research and playful allusions invites us to savor the delightfully mysterious journey that lies ahead, where even the most unconventional correlations may hold unforeseen revelations.

[[RESULTS]]
The endeavor to untangle the enigmatic correlation between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline consumption in Croatia has yielded noteworthy results. Our statistical analysis, akin to a detective's quest for clues, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.7483097 suggests that 74.83% of the variation in one variable can be explained by the other – a surprisingly strong association given the geographical and contextual disparities between the two regions.
The significance of this correlation was further emphasized by the p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is less than 1%. Such a p-value is rarer than a statistically significant unicorn roaming the realms of data analysis.
Additionally, our visual representation of this intriguing relationship, encapsulated in Fig. 1, portrays a scatterplot that tells a tale of its own. The clustering of data points along a clear trajectory reflects the harmonious dance between the air quality in Seneca and the patterns of gasoline usage in Croatia – a waltz of environmental intricacy that invites further contemplation.
In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on a captivating intercontinental connection that challenges conventional scientific boundaries. The discovery of a substantial correlation between air pollution in Seneca and gasoline consumption in Croatia not only raises eyebrows but also underscores the unpredictable nature of statistical exploration. This curious correlation serves as a testament to the unexpected marvels that await those who venture into the world of statistics and scientific inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In unraveling the intricate connection between Seneca's air and Croatian gasoline, our results have spun a fascinating yarn of intercontinental interplay. These findings substantiate the prior research, jolting traditional paradigms and reveling in the mischievous nuances of statistical exploration.

Drawing on the scholarly tapestry woven by Smith et al. and Doe in their treatises on the dance of air quality and fuel consumption, our study has added a quirky twist by substantiating the intercontinental thread in this intricate narrative. Indeed, as Jones expounds on the global dispersion of pollutants, our findings whimsically complement the notion of pollutants transcending geographical boundaries.

On a playful note, we mustn't overlook the literary realm of A. Readman and E. Tankard, whose fanciful works have an uncanny resonance with our scholarly escapade. Even the classic board game "Pollution Pandemonium" seems to offer a lighthearted nod to our unexpected journey.

The hearty correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value serve as pillars reinforcing this lighthearted narrative, akin to finding a rare gem in the rough terrain of statistical analysis. The visual representation in Fig. 1, reminiscent of an avant-garde painting, captures the harmonious waltz of Seneca's air quality and Croatia's gasoline usage, evoking a sense of whimsy and curiosity.

In conclusion, as we saunter through the vibrant landscape of scholarly inquiry, we are reminded that beneath the surface of serious research lies a treasure trove of unpredictability and delightful revelations. Our findings showcase the whimsical and unpredictable nature of statistical exploration, infusing a sense of joyous wonder into this delightful journey.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Gasoline pumped in Croatia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Connecting Carolina's Air and Croatian Gasoline: A Curious Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study seeks to unveil the veiled link between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline consumption in the charming country of Croatia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period from 1992 to 2019, we have discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Though initial findings indicated an incongruous connection between these seemingly unrelated entities, further analysis revealed a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline commerce in Croatia. This correlation, while surprising, suggests a whimsical intertwining of environmental factors across continents. Further investigation into this peculiar relationship could lead to a shift in paradigms regarding the global dispersion of pollutants and their unexpected, yet undeniable, intercontinental connections.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As our inquisitive minds delve into the labyrinth of interconnected phenomena, we often stumble upon the most curious and unexpected correlations. The world of science and statistics is a treasure trove of surprises, and our current pursuit is no exception. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to unravel the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the consumption of gasoline in the enchanting land of Croatia. The quest for this correlation has taken us through the realm of data analysis, unveiling an unforeseen connection that stretches across continents and defies conventional wisdom.
Our exploration is fueled by the intriguing nature of these seemingly disparate variables, where the air quality in the quaint town of Seneca, South Carolina, harmonizes with the ebb and flow of gasoline commerce in the picturesque landscapes of Croatia. Embracing the spirit of scientific inquiry and a healthy dose of skepticism, we set out to scrutinize this enigmatic connection with rigor and mirth.
This study emerges from a blend of curiosity and statistical prowess, leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Our analysis encompasses a period spanning from 1992 to 2019, a temporal canvas on which the brushstrokes of correlation and causation intertwine in a dance of numerical intrigue. Among the symphony of statistical measures, a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, beckoning us to ponder the implications of this unexpected liaison.
While the initial foray into this inquiry raised eyebrows and elicited quizzical looks from our esteemed colleagues, our persistence in probing the labyrinth of data eventually unveiled a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca and the consumption of Croatian gasoline. This revelation, though unconventional, invites us to consider the delightful possibility of unseen threads weaving through the tapestry of global environmental impact.
Join us, dear reader, as we embark on a journey through the world of statistical marvels and delightful correlations. As we untangle the web of intercontinental connections, let us embrace the serendipitous discoveries that await, for in the world of science, even the most unconventional relationships can yield insights of surprising significance.

[[RESULTS]]
The endeavor to untangle the enigmatic correlation between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline consumption in Croatia has yielded noteworthy results. Our statistical analysis, akin to a detective's quest for clues, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.7483097 suggests that 74.83% of the variation in one variable can be explained by the other – a surprisingly strong association given the geographical and contextual disparities between the two regions.
The significance of this correlation was further emphasized by the p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is less than 1%. Such a p-value is rarer than a statistically significant unicorn roaming the realms of data analysis.
Additionally, our visual representation of this intriguing relationship, encapsulated in Fig. 1, portrays a scatterplot that tells a tale of its own. The clustering of data points along a clear trajectory reflects the harmonious dance between the air quality in Seneca and the patterns of gasoline usage in Croatia – a waltz of environmental intricacy that invites further contemplation.
In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on a captivating intercontinental connection that challenges conventional scientific boundaries. The discovery of a substantial correlation between air pollution in Seneca and gasoline consumption in Croatia not only raises eyebrows but also underscores the unpredictable nature of statistical exploration. This curious correlation serves as a testament to the unexpected marvels that await those who venture into the world of statistics and scientific inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

In conclusion, our whimsical odyssey through the realms of statistical inquiry has led us to a most unexpected revelation - a compelling correlation between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the consumption of gasoline in the enchanting land of Croatia. This unusual intercontinental connection, akin to a surreptitious rendezvous between two variables across oceans and continents, serves as a reminder of the marvels that await those who dare to delve into the whimsical world of statistical exploration.

The impressive correlation coefficient of 0.8650490, akin to an unlikely pairing at a statistical ball, and the strikingly low p-value further entrench the seriousness of this seemingly playful liaison. The visual representation in Fig. 1, akin to a whimsical tapestry of data points engaged in a harmonious waltz, adds a dash of visual whimsy to our findings.

Though this may seem like a scientific tall tale, we assure you, dear reader, that our findings bear the hallmark of rigorous statistical analysis and genuine correlation. However, we must acknowledge that this association raises as many questions as it answers – akin to a good mystery novel that leaves the reader pondering the implications long after the last page has been turned.

With that said, we firmly assert that no further research is needed in this area. We must remember that in the realm of statistics, there are no coincidences, only correlations waiting to be discovered. And just when you think you've seen it all, the statistical world surprises you with another curious connection. So, let us bid adieu to this correlation with a sense of wonder and proceed to the next statistical enigma that awaits our exploration.

In the words of the great Sherlock Holmes, "Come, Watson, come! The game is afoot." And indeed, the game of statistical exploration is always afoot, beckoning us to unravel its delightful mysteries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Connecting Carolina's Air and Croatian Gasoline: A Curious Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Absurd Anthropological Associations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Connecting Carolina's Air and Croatian Gasoline: A Curious Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Cross-Cultural Energy Analysis (ACCEA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Connecting Carolina's Air and Croatian Gasoline: A Curious Correlation with an abstract of This study seeks to unveil the veiled link between the air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline consumption in the charming country of Croatia. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period from 1992 to 2019, we have discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.8650490 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.
Though initial findings indicated an incongruous connection between these seemingly unrelated entities, further analysis revealed a subtle interplay between the air quality in Seneca, South Carolina, and the gasoline commerce in Croatia. This correlation, while surprising, suggests a whimsical intertwining of environmental factors across continents. Further investigation into this peculiar relationship could lead to a shift in paradigms regarding the global dispersion of pollutants and their unexpected, yet undeniable, intercontinental connections.

ChatGPT:

Connecting Carolina's Air, Croatian Gasoline, air pollution levels, Seneca, South Carolina, gasoline consumption, Environmental Protection Agency, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, environmental factors, intercontinental connections, global dispersion of pollutants

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Seneca, SC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina

Gasoline pumped in Croatia
Detailed data title: Volume of gasoline pumped consumed in Croatia in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Gasoline pumped in Croatia

Correlation r = 0.8650490 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7483097 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Gasoline pumped in Croatia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina) over the 28 years from 1992 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.9E-9. 0.0000000028801910502409896000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 2.9E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 347,199,190 random variables You don't actually need 347 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 27 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 27 because we have two variables measured over a period of 28 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina (Bad air quality days)0.1069360.1904760.2286590.2535610.2241380.3425930.2813370.4401110.3829110.3388430.3391810.2640450.2443820.2506960.2527780.340720.2348070.1440440.1666670.2279410.1647730.006896550.1547170.06424580.1088830.08611110.1178160.0781759
Gasoline pumped in Croatia (Million Barrels/Day)131215161518171818.271917.620917.714417.667616.850216.569216.592616.919816.197716.148615.190414.839913.788213.46112.4561121211.988711.661611.1474




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.106936,0.190476,0.228659,0.253561,0.224138,0.342593,0.281337,0.440111,0.382911,0.338843,0.339181,0.264045,0.244382,0.250696,0.252778,0.34072,0.234807,0.144044,0.166667,0.227941,0.164773,0.00689655,0.154717,0.0642458,0.108883,0.0861111,0.117816,0.0781759,])
array_2 = np.array([13,12,15,16,15,18,17,18,18.2719,17.6209,17.7144,17.6676,16.8502,16.5692,16.5926,16.9198,16.1977,16.1486,15.1904,14.8399,13.7882,13.461,12.4561,12,12,11.9887,11.6616,11.1474,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina"
array_2_name = "Gasoline pumped in Croatia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 5479 · Black Variable ID: 22125 · Red Variable ID: 24329
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0