about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,272 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How fun Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of blender tenders in Montana.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of blender tenders in Montana increases, so does the overall enthusiasm for all things blender-related. This heightened excitement creates a positive ripple effect, ultimately leading to more amusing and entertaining YouTube video titles about the wonders of automation and the marvels of technological mishaps. It's a blending of unique passions that results in a whirlwind of fun and pure joy.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: Simone Giertz, surrounded by a group of cheerful blender tenders, is in the center of a bustling Montana town square. She is shown with an endearing expression, joyfully creating YouTube video titles on her laptop, while the blender tenders busy themselves with their blenders in the background. The scene is filled with laughter and excitement, and the overall atmosphere is brimming with the marvels of technological mishaps and the fun of automation. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How fun Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are and The number of blender tenders in Montana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cyberpunk An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cyberpunk Celtic art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How fun Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are and The number of blender tenders in Montana, in the following situation: As the number of blender tenders in Montana increases, so does the overall enthusiasm for all things blender-related. This heightened excitement creates a positive ripple effect, ultimately leading to more amusing and entertaining YouTube video titles about the wonders of automation and the marvels of technological mishaps. It's a blending of unique passions that results in a whirlwind of fun and pure joy.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Montana, as the number of blender tenders increases, so does the overall enthusiasm for all things blender-related. In this whirlwind of fun, Simone Giertz is seen enthusiastically creating entertaining YouTube video titles about the wonders of automation and the marvels of technological mishaps. As she mingles with the blender tenders, her joyful and amusing creations bring smiles to everyone's faces.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In Montana, as the number of blender tenders increases, so does the overall enthusiasm for all things blender-related. In this whirlwind of fun, Simone Giertz is seen enthusiastically creating entertaining YouTube video titles about the wonders of automation and the marvels of technological mishaps. As she mingles with the blender tenders, her joyful and amusing creations bring smiles to everyone's faces. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: Simone Giertz, surrounded by a group of cheerful blender tenders, is in the center of a bustling Montana town square. She is shown with an endearing expression, joyfully creating YouTube video titles on her laptop, while the blender tenders busy themselves with their blenders in the background. The scene is filled with laughter and excitement, and the overall atmosphere is brimming with the marvels of technological mishaps and the fun of automation.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How fun Simone Giertz YouTube video titles are caused The number of blender tenders in Montana to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blending Fun and Employment: The Incredibly Whirled Connection Between Simone Giertz's YouTube Video Titles and Blender Tenders in Montana

The Journal of Quirky Innovation and Occupational Integration

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Simone Giertz YouTube video titles are and The number of blender tenders in Montana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9569837 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Blending Fun and Employment: The Incredibly Whirled Connection Between Simone Giertz's YouTube Video Titles and Blender Tenders in Montana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a research study that delves into the unexpected correlation between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana. With a lighthearted and whimsical approach, we aim to blend the realms of humor and economic analysis to uncover the surprising interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through meticulous AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we observed a stratospheric correlation coefficient of 0.9569837 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning 2014 to 2019. The findings not only leave us with a sense of wonder but also prompt us to blend into the fascinating world of quirky correlations and punny revelations. So, join us in this intriguing journey as we blend humor and empirical evidence to shed light on the surprising bond between the playful creativity of YouTube video titles and the labor market for blender tenders in Montana.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Simone Giertz YouTube video titles are and The number of blender tenders in Montana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blending Fun and Employment: The Incredibly Whirled Connection Between Simone Giertz's YouTube Video Titles and Blender Tenders in Montana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a research study that delves into the unexpected correlation between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana. With a lighthearted and whimsical approach, we aim to blend the realms of humor and economic analysis to uncover the surprising interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through meticulous AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we observed a stratospheric correlation coefficient of 0.9569837 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning 2014 to 2019. The findings not only leave us with a sense of wonder but also prompt us to blend into the fascinating world of quirky correlations and punny revelations. So, join us in this intriguing journey as we blend humor and empirical evidence to shed light on the surprising bond between the playful creativity of YouTube video titles and the labor market for blender tenders in Montana.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
The field of economic analysis is often associated with serious data, complex models, and dry academic discussions. However, this research aims to add a splash of humor and whimsy to the mix by exploring an unexpected correlation that has left us buzzing with excitement. We set out to investigate the playful realm of YouTube video titles, particularly those crafted by the charmingly inventive Simone Giertz, and their surprisingly fun-loving connection to the employment landscape of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana.

One might expect the world of economic analysis to be as dry as a slice of unbuttered toast, but fear not – this investigation promises to be as vibrant and entertaining as a blender on full throttle. Our journey takes us from the zany and inventive domain of online content creation to the labor market for individuals who handle the whirlwind world of blenders in Montana. And just like Simone Giertz's contraptions, we aim to infuse this study with ingenuity and a heavy dose of fun.

As we dive into this whirlwind of a study, we challenge the conventional wisdom that economic research must be as serious as a business meeting on a Monday morning. Instead, we embrace the laughter-inducing, head-spinning notion that there might be a connection between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the job market for blender tenders. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt a reevaluation of the interplay between cheerfully crafted content and serious economic indicators.

So, buckle up and prepare for a ride that is as unexpected as receiving a smoothie from a blender, for we embark on a journey that blends economic analysis with a side of spirited humor. Together, we shall explore the playful world of online content creation and its surprising ties to the labor market, in a study that promises to leave you as thoroughly mixed up as a perfectly crafted milkshake.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Simone Giertz YouTube video titles are and The number of blender tenders in Montana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blending Fun and Employment: The Incredibly Whirled Connection Between Simone Giertz's YouTube Video Titles and Blender Tenders in Montana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a research study that delves into the unexpected correlation between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana. With a lighthearted and whimsical approach, we aim to blend the realms of humor and economic analysis to uncover the surprising interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through meticulous AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we observed a stratospheric correlation coefficient of 0.9569837 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning 2014 to 2019. The findings not only leave us with a sense of wonder but also prompt us to blend into the fascinating world of quirky correlations and punny revelations. So, join us in this intriguing journey as we blend humor and empirical evidence to shed light on the surprising bond between the playful creativity of YouTube video titles and the labor market for blender tenders in Montana.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of economic analysis is often associated with serious data, complex models, and dry academic discussions. However, this research aims to add a splash of humor and whimsy to the mix by exploring an unexpected correlation that has left us buzzing with excitement. We set out to investigate the playful realm of YouTube video titles, particularly those crafted by the charmingly inventive Simone Giertz, and their surprisingly fun-loving connection to the employment landscape of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana.
One might expect the world of economic analysis to be as dry as a slice of unbuttered toast, but fear not – this investigation promises to be as vibrant and entertaining as a blender on full throttle. Our journey takes us from the zany and inventive domain of online content creation to the labor market for individuals who handle the whirlwind world of blenders in Montana. And just like Simone Giertz's contraptions, we aim to infuse this study with ingenuity and a heavy dose of fun.
As we dive into this whirlwind of a study, we challenge the conventional wisdom that economic research must be as serious as a business meeting on a Monday morning. Instead, we embrace the laughter-inducing, head-spinning notion that there might be a connection between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the job market for blender tenders. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt a reevaluation of the interplay between cheerfully crafted content and serious economic indicators.
So, buckle up and prepare for a ride that is as unexpected as receiving a smoothie from a blender, for we embark on a journey that blends economic analysis with a side of spirited humor. Together, we shall explore the playful world of online content creation and its surprising ties to the labor market, in a study that promises to leave you as thoroughly mixed up as a perfectly crafted milkshake.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we embark on this whimsical journey into the interconnected realms of YouTube humor and labor market trends, it is pertinent to review the existing literature on seemingly unrelated correlations and unconventional sources of economic insights. Smith et al. (2017) introduced the concept of "jovial juxtaposition" in their study exploring the lighthearted link between online creativity and its impact on professional domains. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the nuanced interplay of digital content and its potential influence on workforce dynamics, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the delightful domain of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the employment landscape for blender tenders in Montana.

Expanding our scope to encompass related non-fiction books, we encounter "The Art of Playful Economics" by Brown (2019), which charmingly parallels the merriment of humor with serious economic analysis, much like the blending of fruit and ice in a smoothie. Additionally, "The Quirky Quotient: Unconventional Correlations in Modern Economics" by Green (2016) introduces us to the idea that unexpected sources of insight, much like the surprise gag in a comedy sketch, can provide valuable perspectives on economic phenomena.

In the fictitious realm, "Blending Worlds: A Tale of Economic Enchantment" by Sparkle (2018) simulates the fictional realm of the whimsical economics, where the unexpected merger of disparate elements leads to magical and unexpected outcomes, not unlike the connection we aim to uncover between YouTube humor and employment patterns. Furthermore, "The Blender Chronicles: A Fantasy about Kitchen Appliance Realms" by Flint (2014) whimsically portrays a world where blenders hold the key to boundless adventures, akin to the unforeseen revelations we anticipate in our study.

In our unorthodox quest for insights, we also explored unusual sources such as the back of shampoo bottles, intrigued by the blend of comedic ingredients and economic marvels that are sure to leave us thoroughly rinsed with laughter and surprise. While these sources may appear unconventional, they serve as a reminder that valuable insights can emerge from the most unexpected of places, much like finding the perfect mix of ingredients for a delightfully refreshing smoothie.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Simone Giertz YouTube video titles are and The number of blender tenders in Montana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2014 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blending Fun and Employment: The Incredibly Whirled Connection Between Simone Giertz's YouTube Video Titles and Blender Tenders in Montana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a research study that delves into the unexpected correlation between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana. With a lighthearted and whimsical approach, we aim to blend the realms of humor and economic analysis to uncover the surprising interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through meticulous AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we observed a stratospheric correlation coefficient of 0.9569837 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning 2014 to 2019. The findings not only leave us with a sense of wonder but also prompt us to blend into the fascinating world of quirky correlations and punny revelations. So, join us in this intriguing journey as we blend humor and empirical evidence to shed light on the surprising bond between the playful creativity of YouTube video titles and the labor market for blender tenders in Montana.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The field of economic analysis is often associated with serious data, complex models, and dry academic discussions. However, this research aims to add a splash of humor and whimsy to the mix by exploring an unexpected correlation that has left us buzzing with excitement. We set out to investigate the playful realm of YouTube video titles, particularly those crafted by the charmingly inventive Simone Giertz, and their surprisingly fun-loving connection to the employment landscape of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana.
One might expect the world of economic analysis to be as dry as a slice of unbuttered toast, but fear not – this investigation promises to be as vibrant and entertaining as a blender on full throttle. Our journey takes us from the zany and inventive domain of online content creation to the labor market for individuals who handle the whirlwind world of blenders in Montana. And just like Simone Giertz's contraptions, we aim to infuse this study with ingenuity and a heavy dose of fun.
As we dive into this whirlwind of a study, we challenge the conventional wisdom that economic research must be as serious as a business meeting on a Monday morning. Instead, we embrace the laughter-inducing, head-spinning notion that there might be a connection between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the job market for blender tenders. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt a reevaluation of the interplay between cheerfully crafted content and serious economic indicators.
So, buckle up and prepare for a ride that is as unexpected as receiving a smoothie from a blender, for we embark on a journey that blends economic analysis with a side of spirited humor. Together, we shall explore the playful world of online content creation and its surprising ties to the labor market, in a study that promises to leave you as thoroughly mixed up as a perfectly crafted milkshake.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

The methodology employed in this research study was as meticulously crafted as a Simone Giertz invention, combining elements of data analysis, AI interpretation, and a dash of whimsy. To investigate the correlation between Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the state of Montana, we conducted a multi-tiered approach that aimed to blend humor, creativity, and empirical analysis in a way that would leave conventional economic researchers scratching their heads in amusement.

First, we utilized advanced AI algorithms to sift through and analyze a corpus of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles from the period of 2014 to 2019. This phase involved a careful assessment of the fun quotient, whimsical wordplay, and overall joviality present in the titles. As we dived into this endeavor, we had to navigate through a digital sea of puns, clever word combinations, and inventive linguistic concoctions – a journey as challenging as unraveling the inner workings of one of Simone's contraptions.

Simultaneously, we delved into the Bureau of Labor Statistics database to extract and scrutinize the employment data related to blender tenders in Montana during the same time frame. This phase involved meticulous sifting through employment records, job descriptions, and statistically sound data wrangling – a process as intricate as a carefully choreographed blender routine.

Once we had amassed and prepared the data from these diverse sources, we employed a combination of statistical techniques, including correlation analysis, regression modeling, and possibly a smidgen of whimsical imagination. The AI-quantified fun factor of the YouTube video titles was compared with the employment figures for blender tenders, using standard statistical measures to ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship. As we embarked on this analysis, we had to navigate through a forest of numbers, coefficients, and p-values, aiming to blend the seriousness of empirical analysis with a lighthearted sprinkle of playful interpretation.

It is important to note that this methodology was meticulously designed to maintain the integrity of the research while infusing it with a lighthearted sense of whimsy. By blending the rigorous standards of economic analysis with the creative spark present in Simone Giertz's content, we aimed to uncover a connection as surprising and delightful as stumbling upon a perfectly executed pun.

In summary, the methodology embraced in this study was as quirky and inventive as a Simone Giertz creation – a blend of statistical rigor, digital ingenuity, and a whimsical touch that aimed to baffle, charm, and captivate in equal measure. So, strap in for a journey as unexpected and delightful as witnessing a mind-bending blender-based magic trick, for our methodology promised a blend of data analysis, AI interpretation, and a generous sprinkle of Simone's signature whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Simone Giertz YouTube video titles are and The number of blender tenders in Montana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2014 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.9569837, r-squared of 0.9158178, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blending Fun and Employment: The Incredibly Whirled Connection Between Simone Giertz's YouTube Video Titles and Blender Tenders in Montana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a research study that delves into the unexpected correlation between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana. With a lighthearted and whimsical approach, we aim to blend the realms of humor and economic analysis to uncover the surprising interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through meticulous AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we observed a stratospheric correlation coefficient of 0.9569837 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning 2014 to 2019. The findings not only leave us with a sense of wonder but also prompt us to blend into the fascinating world of quirky correlations and punny revelations. So, join us in this intriguing journey as we blend humor and empirical evidence to shed light on the surprising bond between the playful creativity of YouTube video titles and the labor market for blender tenders in Montana.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The field of economic analysis is often associated with serious data, complex models, and dry academic discussions. However, this research aims to add a splash of humor and whimsy to the mix by exploring an unexpected correlation that has left us buzzing with excitement. We set out to investigate the playful realm of YouTube video titles, particularly those crafted by the charmingly inventive Simone Giertz, and their surprisingly fun-loving connection to the employment landscape of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana.
One might expect the world of economic analysis to be as dry as a slice of unbuttered toast, but fear not – this investigation promises to be as vibrant and entertaining as a blender on full throttle. Our journey takes us from the zany and inventive domain of online content creation to the labor market for individuals who handle the whirlwind world of blenders in Montana. And just like Simone Giertz's contraptions, we aim to infuse this study with ingenuity and a heavy dose of fun.
As we dive into this whirlwind of a study, we challenge the conventional wisdom that economic research must be as serious as a business meeting on a Monday morning. Instead, we embrace the laughter-inducing, head-spinning notion that there might be a connection between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the job market for blender tenders. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt a reevaluation of the interplay between cheerfully crafted content and serious economic indicators.
So, buckle up and prepare for a ride that is as unexpected as receiving a smoothie from a blender, for we embark on a journey that blends economic analysis with a side of spirited humor. Together, we shall explore the playful world of online content creation and its surprising ties to the labor market, in a study that promises to leave you as thoroughly mixed up as a perfectly crafted milkshake.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our study revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the illustrious state of Montana. We observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9569837, indicating a robust and nearly perfect positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9158178 further emphasizes the strength of this connection, leaving us in awe of the unexpected link between whimsical creativity and gainful employment. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, affirming the statistical significance of this relationship.

To illustrate this captivating correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the exuberant synergy between the fun factor in Simone Giertz's video titles and the employment landscape for blender tenders in Montana.

These compelling results not only pique our curiosity but also remind us of the delightful surprises that await in the realm of economic analysis. We are left contemplating the whimsical interplay between online content creation and the labor market, a fusion that challenges traditional notions and beckons us to embrace the unexpected with open arms.

Our journey into the world of quirky correlations and punny revelations has left us with a newfound appreciation for the lighthearted interconnectedness that transcends conventional wisdom. As we navigate the whirlwind of surprising connections, we are reminded that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings turn out to be the most delightful. In blending fun and employment, we have uncovered a bond that transcends boundaries and captures the essence of economic whimsy in its purest form.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Simone Giertz YouTube video titles are and The number of blender tenders in Montana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Blending Fun and Employment: The Incredibly Whirled Connection Between Simone Giertz's YouTube Video Titles and Blender Tenders in Montana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a research study that delves into the unexpected correlation between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana. With a lighthearted and whimsical approach, we aim to blend the realms of humor and economic analysis to uncover the surprising interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through meticulous AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we observed a stratospheric correlation coefficient of 0.9569837 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning 2014 to 2019. The findings not only leave us with a sense of wonder but also prompt us to blend into the fascinating world of quirky correlations and punny revelations. So, join us in this intriguing journey as we blend humor and empirical evidence to shed light on the surprising bond between the playful creativity of YouTube video titles and the labor market for blender tenders in Montana.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we embark on this whimsical journey into the interconnected realms of YouTube humor and labor market trends, it is pertinent to review the existing literature on seemingly unrelated correlations and unconventional sources of economic insights. Smith et al. (2017) introduced the concept of "jovial juxtaposition" in their study exploring the lighthearted link between online creativity and its impact on professional domains. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the nuanced interplay of digital content and its potential influence on workforce dynamics, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the delightful domain of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos and the employment landscape for blender tenders in Montana.
Expanding our scope to encompass related non-fiction books, we encounter "The Art of Playful Economics" by Brown (2019), which charmingly parallels the merriment of humor with serious economic analysis, much like the blending of fruit and ice in a smoothie. Additionally, "The Quirky Quotient: Unconventional Correlations in Modern Economics" by Green (2016) introduces us to the idea that unexpected sources of insight, much like the surprise gag in a comedy sketch, can provide valuable perspectives on economic phenomena.
In the fictitious realm, "Blending Worlds: A Tale of Economic Enchantment" by Sparkle (2018) simulates the fictional realm of the whimsical economics, where the unexpected merger of disparate elements leads to magical and unexpected outcomes, not unlike the connection we aim to uncover between YouTube humor and employment patterns. Furthermore, "The Blender Chronicles: A Fantasy about Kitchen Appliance Realms" by Flint (2014) whimsically portrays a world where blenders hold the key to boundless adventures, akin to the unforeseen revelations we anticipate in our study.
In our unorthodox quest for insights, we also explored unusual sources such as the back of shampoo bottles, intrigued by the blend of comedic ingredients and economic marvels that are sure to leave us thoroughly rinsed with laughter and surprise. While these sources may appear unconventional, they serve as a reminder that valuable insights can emerge from the most unexpected of places, much like finding the perfect mix of ingredients for a delightfully refreshing smoothie.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our study revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the illustrious state of Montana. We observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9569837, indicating a robust and nearly perfect positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9158178 further emphasizes the strength of this connection, leaving us in awe of the unexpected link between whimsical creativity and gainful employment. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, affirming the statistical significance of this relationship.
To illustrate this captivating correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the exuberant synergy between the fun factor in Simone Giertz's video titles and the employment landscape for blender tenders in Montana.
These compelling results not only pique our curiosity but also remind us of the delightful surprises that await in the realm of economic analysis. We are left contemplating the whimsical interplay between online content creation and the labor market, a fusion that challenges traditional notions and beckons us to embrace the unexpected with open arms.
Our journey into the world of quirky correlations and punny revelations has left us with a newfound appreciation for the lighthearted interconnectedness that transcends conventional wisdom. As we navigate the whirlwind of surprising connections, we are reminded that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings turn out to be the most delightful. In blending fun and employment, we have uncovered a bond that transcends boundaries and captures the essence of economic whimsy in its purest form.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The striking findings of our study not only reassure us of the robust relationship between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the occupation of blender tenders in Montana but leave us marveling at the whimsical web of interconnectivity that underpins seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Previous literature on "jovial juxtaposition" and the nuanced interplay of digital content and workforce dynamics laid the foundation for our exploration. The whimsical correlations described by Smith et al. (2017) and Doe and Jones (2015) were brought to life in our study, providing empirical support for the mirthful link between online creativity and labor market trends. The unexpectedly strong correlation coefficient we observed echoes the humorous yet insightful perspectives highlighted by Brown's delightful work on "The Art of Playful Economics" (2019) and Green's introduction to unconventional correlations in modern economics, akin to unlocking the unexpected punchline of a comedic masterpiece.

As we investigated the unexpected, the back of shampoo bottles and unconventional literary works offered unexpected yet intriguing parallels to our quest for insights, reminiscent of the delightfully refreshing experience of finding the perfect blend of ingredients for a smoothie. Embracing the unconventional and the unexpected, we ventured into uncharted territory, only to uncover a blend of humor and empirical evidence that defied traditional economic paradigms, akin to discovering the perfect blend of fruits to create a delectable smoothie.

The regression analysis and visual representation of the strong correlation in Fig. 1 encapsulate the whimsical synergy between the playful creativity of Simone Giertz's video titles and the labor market for blender tenders in Montana. This underscores not only the statistical significance of our findings but also the mirthful nature of the unexpected bonds that underlie economic phenomena.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry, our study whisks us away into a world where unexpected pairings lead to delightful revelations. As we ponder the interplay of humor and employment, we are reminded that sometimes the most seemingly unrelated elements coalesce to create a symphony of delight, much like the harmonious fusion of ingredients in a perfectly blended smoothie. This study fuels our commitment to unearthing the unexpected and infusing the serious with the whimsical, all while marveling at the inexplicable connections that leave us grinning in astonishment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How fun Simone Giertz YouTube video titles are and The number of blender tenders in Montana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Blending Fun and Employment: The Incredibly Whirled Connection Between Simone Giertz's YouTube Video Titles and Blender Tenders in Montana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a research study that delves into the unexpected correlation between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana. With a lighthearted and whimsical approach, we aim to blend the realms of humor and economic analysis to uncover the surprising interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through meticulous AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we observed a stratospheric correlation coefficient of 0.9569837 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning 2014 to 2019. The findings not only leave us with a sense of wonder but also prompt us to blend into the fascinating world of quirky correlations and punny revelations. So, join us in this intriguing journey as we blend humor and empirical evidence to shed light on the surprising bond between the playful creativity of YouTube video titles and the labor market for blender tenders in Montana.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The field of economic analysis is often associated with serious data, complex models, and dry academic discussions. However, this research aims to add a splash of humor and whimsy to the mix by exploring an unexpected correlation that has left us buzzing with excitement. We set out to investigate the playful realm of YouTube video titles, particularly those crafted by the charmingly inventive Simone Giertz, and their surprisingly fun-loving connection to the employment landscape of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana.
One might expect the world of economic analysis to be as dry as a slice of unbuttered toast, but fear not – this investigation promises to be as vibrant and entertaining as a blender on full throttle. Our journey takes us from the zany and inventive domain of online content creation to the labor market for individuals who handle the whirlwind world of blenders in Montana. And just like Simone Giertz's contraptions, we aim to infuse this study with ingenuity and a heavy dose of fun.
As we dive into this whirlwind of a study, we challenge the conventional wisdom that economic research must be as serious as a business meeting on a Monday morning. Instead, we embrace the laughter-inducing, head-spinning notion that there might be a connection between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the job market for blender tenders. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt a reevaluation of the interplay between cheerfully crafted content and serious economic indicators.
So, buckle up and prepare for a ride that is as unexpected as receiving a smoothie from a blender, for we embark on a journey that blends economic analysis with a side of spirited humor. Together, we shall explore the playful world of online content creation and its surprising ties to the labor market, in a study that promises to leave you as thoroughly mixed up as a perfectly crafted milkshake.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our study revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the illustrious state of Montana. We observed a correlation coefficient of 0.9569837, indicating a robust and nearly perfect positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9158178 further emphasizes the strength of this connection, leaving us in awe of the unexpected link between whimsical creativity and gainful employment. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, affirming the statistical significance of this relationship.
To illustrate this captivating correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the exuberant synergy between the fun factor in Simone Giertz's video titles and the employment landscape for blender tenders in Montana.
These compelling results not only pique our curiosity but also remind us of the delightful surprises that await in the realm of economic analysis. We are left contemplating the whimsical interplay between online content creation and the labor market, a fusion that challenges traditional notions and beckons us to embrace the unexpected with open arms.
Our journey into the world of quirky correlations and punny revelations has left us with a newfound appreciation for the lighthearted interconnectedness that transcends conventional wisdom. As we navigate the whirlwind of surprising connections, we are reminded that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings turn out to be the most delightful. In blending fun and employment, we have uncovered a bond that transcends boundaries and captures the essence of economic whimsy in its purest form.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has whisked us away into the exhilarating world of blending fun and employment, uncovering a connection that is as surprising as finding a spoon in a blender. The robust correlation between the playful creativity of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the labor market for blender tenders in Montana defies conventional economic analysis and leaves us marveling at the whimsical twists and turns of this unexpected relationship. It seems that when it comes to blending humor and empirical evidence, we have stumbled upon a concoction that is as delightfully perplexing as a smoothie made with an assortment of unusual ingredients.

Through our meticulous investigation, we have peeled back the layers of conventional wisdom to reveal a delightful fusion of giggles and gainful employment. It's as if the economic indicators and lighthearted creativity have come together in a synchronized swirl, much like the mesmerizing rotation of a well-crafted milkshake.

As we contemplate the exuberant synergy captured in our results, we cannot help but appreciate the remarkable interconnectedness that transcends the boundaries of traditional analysis. The whimsical interplay between seemingly unrelated realms has left us in a state of awe, akin to witnessing a mesmerizing display of blending prowess.

Indeed, the findings of our study not only provoke laughter but also prompt a reimagining of the possibilities that await in the unexplored territories of economic analysis. We have ventured into a space where statistical significance and playful ingenuity converge, unveiling a combination that is as refreshing as a sip of lemonade on a hot summer day.

In light of these revelatory findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. The connection between the fun quotient of YouTube video titles and the employment landscape for blender tenders in Montana stands as a delightful testament to the enchanting surprises that await when humor and empirical evidence swirl together in perfect harmony.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blending Fun and Employment: The Incredibly Whirled Connection Between Simone Giertz's YouTube Video Titles and Blender Tenders in Montana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Innovation and Occupational Integration


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blending Fun and Employment: The Incredibly Whirled Connection Between Simone Giertz's YouTube Video Titles and Blender Tenders in Montana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Whimsical Innovation and Culinary Exploration


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blending Fun and Employment: The Incredibly Whirled Connection Between Simone Giertz's YouTube Video Titles and Blender Tenders in Montana with an abstract of In this paper, we present a research study that delves into the unexpected correlation between the fun quotient of Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles and the number of blender tenders in the picturesque state of Montana. With a lighthearted and whimsical approach, we aim to blend the realms of humor and economic analysis to uncover the surprising interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through meticulous AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we observed a stratospheric correlation coefficient of 0.9569837 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning 2014 to 2019. The findings not only leave us with a sense of wonder but also prompt us to blend into the fascinating world of quirky correlations and punny revelations. So, join us in this intriguing journey as we blend humor and empirical evidence to shed light on the surprising bond between the playful creativity of YouTube video titles and the labor market for blender tenders in Montana.

ChatGPT:

Simone Giertz, YouTube video titles, blender tenders, Montana, correlation, economic analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, AI analysis, quirky correlations, punny revelations, fun quotient, empirical evidence, stratospheric correlation coefficient, lighthearted approach, whimsical, humor, surprising bond.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How fun Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How fun Simone Giertz YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How fun Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are

The number of blender tenders in Montana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of mixing and blending machine setters, operators, and tenders in Montana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of blender tenders in Montana

Correlation r = 0.9569837 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9158178 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of blender tenders in Montana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How fun Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are) over the 6 years from 2014 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0027. 0.0027358035313001980000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 0.27% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 366 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201420152016201720182019
How fun Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are (Fun score (out of 10))56.69236.256.3565.6
The number of blender tenders in Montana (Laborers)160270250240210170




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5,6.6923,6.25,6.35,6,5.6,])
array_2 = np.array([160,270,250,240,210,170,])
array_1_name = "How fun Simone Giertz's YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of blender tenders in Montana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 5272 · Black Variable ID: 25688 · Red Variable ID: 10823
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0