about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,833 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the second variable is Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality improved in Decatur, Alabama, residents suddenly found themselves with an excess of energy and vitality. This newfound vigor led to a surge in recreational activities, with people enthusiastically partaking in extreme sports and impromptu dance-offs. The demand for crutches skyrocketed as a result of these epic, high-flying shenanigans. Remember, when the air is crisp, the antics are risky, and the crutches are flying off the shelves!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image showing a vibrant cityscape of Decatur, Alabama, with crystal-clear blue skies and an atmosphere of energy and vitality. The streets are filled with dynamic scenes of extreme sports and impromptu dance-offs, capturing the vibrancy and liveliness of the residents. At the same time, depict a surge in demand for crutches at local stores, hinting at the fearless and daring nature of the adventurers. The overall scene should exude a sense of exhilaration and zeal, showcasing the newfound excitement that comes with the improved air quality. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' A Discovery magazine cover image Sci-fi fantacy a funny image you would see on reddit Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google searches for 'where to buy crutches', in the following situation: As the air quality improved in Decatur, Alabama, residents suddenly found themselves with an excess of energy and vitality. This newfound vigor led to a surge in recreational activities, with people enthusiastically partaking in extreme sports and impromptu dance-offs. The demand for crutches skyrocketed as a result of these epic, high-flying shenanigans. Remember, when the air is crisp, the antics are risky, and the crutches are flying off the shelves!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Decatur, Alabama, the air quality improved, filling the skies with fresh, clean air. Energetic residents took to the streets, engaging in extreme sports and impromptu dance-offs, their vitality shining through. Meanwhile, at local stores, the demand for crutches soared as people embraced the risks and thrills of their adventures.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Decatur, Alabama, the air quality improved, filling the skies with fresh, clean air. Energetic residents took to the streets, engaging in extreme sports and impromptu dance-offs, their vitality shining through. Meanwhile, at local stores, the demand for crutches soared as people embraced the risks and thrills of their adventures. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image showing a vibrant cityscape of Decatur, Alabama, with crystal-clear blue skies and an atmosphere of energy and vitality. The streets are filled with dynamic scenes of extreme sports and impromptu dance-offs, capturing the vibrancy and liveliness of the residents. At the same time, depict a surge in demand for crutches at local stores, hinting at the fearless and daring nature of the adventurers. The overall scene should exude a sense of exhilaration and zeal, showcasing the newfound excitement that comes with the improved air quality.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Decatur, Alabama caused where to buy crutches (Google searches for 'where to buy crutches') to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Crutch-ing the Numbers: A Correlational Study of Air Quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Crutches'

Journal of Quirky Sociology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Crutch-ing the Numbers: A Correlational Study of Air Quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Crutches'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we crutch-ed the numbers to investigate the surprising relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and online searches for 'where to buy crutches'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team explored whether there is a tangible link between poor air quality and the interest in purchasing crutches. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2005 to 2023.

Our findings indicate a clear association between deteriorating air quality in Decatur and the surge in searches for crutches online. This unexpected connection may raise eyebrows but holds significant implications for public health and consumer behavior. Our research opens the door to further investigations into the psychological and physiological responses to environmental pollutants, as well as the quirky ways in which individuals seek solutions to discomfort, all while avoiding "falling" into hasty conclusions.

As our study provides a glimpse into the whimsical interplay of human behavior and air quality, we must not limp behind in understanding the humorous, albeit thought-provoking, dynamics at play.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Crutch-ing the Numbers: A Correlational Study of Air Quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Crutches'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we crutch-ed the numbers to investigate the surprising relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and online searches for 'where to buy crutches'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team explored whether there is a tangible link between poor air quality and the interest in purchasing crutches. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2005 to 2023.

Our findings indicate a clear association between deteriorating air quality in Decatur and the surge in searches for crutches online. This unexpected connection may raise eyebrows but holds significant implications for public health and consumer behavior. Our research opens the door to further investigations into the psychological and physiological responses to environmental pollutants, as well as the quirky ways in which individuals seek solutions to discomfort, all while avoiding "falling" into hasty conclusions.

As our study provides a glimpse into the whimsical interplay of human behavior and air quality, we must not limp behind in understanding the humorous, albeit thought-provoking, dynamics at play.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

"A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible." - Freeman Dyson

The correlation between environmental factors and human behavior has long intrigued researchers who are not afraid to "think outside the box." Indeed, it’s often the unexpected connections that drive scientific curiosity and open new avenues for investigation. In this vein, our study takes a step back and looks at the leg of the issue -- pun intended -- by examining the striking link between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'.

It sounds like the setup for a classic, 'walks into a bar' joke, but the relationship we uncovered is no laughing matter. As we crutch-ed our way through the data, our team was floored to find a significant connection between air quality and the interest in crutch purchasing. This discovery prompted us to roll up our sleeves and delve deeper into the numbers, making sure not to stumble over statistical pitfalls along the way.

Now, you might be wondering, “What's the real reason behind this peculiar correlation?” Is it merely a limping statistical fluke, or does it hint at something more profound? Our research aims to provide some clarity on this matter, demonstrating the value of examining correlations that, at first glance, might seem as elusive as finding humor in a research paper.

As we embark on this scientific journey, we must be mindful not to jump to conclusions or hobble our way through unfounded assumptions. Instead, we will approach this connection with the utmost seriousness, all while keeping our sense of humor intact. After all, science without a little fun is like a joke without a punchline – it just doesn't hold up.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Crutch-ing the Numbers: A Correlational Study of Air Quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Crutches'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we crutch-ed the numbers to investigate the surprising relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and online searches for 'where to buy crutches'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team explored whether there is a tangible link between poor air quality and the interest in purchasing crutches. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2005 to 2023.

Our findings indicate a clear association between deteriorating air quality in Decatur and the surge in searches for crutches online. This unexpected connection may raise eyebrows but holds significant implications for public health and consumer behavior. Our research opens the door to further investigations into the psychological and physiological responses to environmental pollutants, as well as the quirky ways in which individuals seek solutions to discomfort, all while avoiding "falling" into hasty conclusions.

As our study provides a glimpse into the whimsical interplay of human behavior and air quality, we must not limp behind in understanding the humorous, albeit thought-provoking, dynamics at play.


-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible." - Freeman Dyson
The correlation between environmental factors and human behavior has long intrigued researchers who are not afraid to "think outside the box." Indeed, it’s often the unexpected connections that drive scientific curiosity and open new avenues for investigation. In this vein, our study takes a step back and looks at the leg of the issue by examining the striking link between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'.
It sounds like the setup for a classic, 'walks into a bar' joke, but the relationship we uncovered is no laughing matter. As we crutch-ed our way through the data, our team was floored to find a significant connection between air quality and the interest in crutch purchasing. This discovery prompted us to roll up our sleeves and delve deeper into the numbers, making sure not to stumble over statistical pitfalls along the way.
Now, you might be wondering, “What's the real reason behind this peculiar correlation?” Is it merely a limping statistical fluke, or does it hint at something more profound? Our research aims to provide some clarity on this matter, demonstrating the value of examining correlations that, at first glance, might seem as elusive as finding humor in a research paper.
As we embark on this scientific journey, we must be mindful not to jump to conclusions or hobble our way through unfounded assumptions. Instead, we will approach this connection with the utmost seriousness, all while keeping our sense of humor intact. After all, science without a little fun is like a joke without a punchline – it just doesn't hold up.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google searches for 'where to buy crutches' brings to mind the work of Smith (2010), who studied the impact of environmental factors on consumer behavior. Additionally, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the psychological responses to pollutants, shedding light on the intricate ways in which individuals adapt to discomfort.

However, as we tread further into the unexpected correlation between air quality and the hunt for crutches, we are reminded of the classic saying, "Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field." Similarly, our study endeavors to stand out in its field by elucidating the quirky connection between environmental conditions and consumer interests.

Turning the page of our discussion to related literature, "The Air We Breathe: Understanding Environmental Health" by John Smith provides valuable insights into the impact of air quality on human health. Building on this foundation, "Crutching Numbers: An Empirical Investigation" by Jane Doe offers a comprehensive exploration of unanticipated correlations in consumer behavior, akin to our research focus.

In the realm of fiction, the novel "The Great Crutch Caper" by James Jones takes a whimsical approach to uncovering surprising connections in a small town, mirroring our quest for understanding the seemingly improbable relationship between air quality and crutch inquiries.

As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is crucial to approach our topic with intellectual curiosity and a touch of levity, reminiscent of the animated series "The Magic School Bus," where unconventional connections are explored with both seriousness and a light-hearted spirit. Similarly, the playful antics of the "Paw Patrol" series remind us to approach unexpected discoveries with a sense of adventure and excitement.

In uncovering the unexpected bonds between air quality in Decatur and the quest for crutches, our research aims to bridge the gap between scientific inquiry and everyday curiosities, all while infusing the discussion with a dose of humor and whimsy. As we forge ahead, let us not forget the wise words of Albert Einstein, who said, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2005 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Crutch-ing the Numbers: A Correlational Study of Air Quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Crutches'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we crutch-ed the numbers to investigate the surprising relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and online searches for 'where to buy crutches'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team explored whether there is a tangible link between poor air quality and the interest in purchasing crutches. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2005 to 2023.

Our findings indicate a clear association between deteriorating air quality in Decatur and the surge in searches for crutches online. This unexpected connection may raise eyebrows but holds significant implications for public health and consumer behavior. Our research opens the door to further investigations into the psychological and physiological responses to environmental pollutants, as well as the quirky ways in which individuals seek solutions to discomfort, all while avoiding "falling" into hasty conclusions.

As our study provides a glimpse into the whimsical interplay of human behavior and air quality, we must not limp behind in understanding the humorous, albeit thought-provoking, dynamics at play.


[[INTRODUCTION]]
"A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible." - Freeman Dyson
The correlation between environmental factors and human behavior has long intrigued researchers who are not afraid to "think outside the box." Indeed, it’s often the unexpected connections that drive scientific curiosity and open new avenues for investigation. In this vein, our study takes a step back and looks at the leg of the issue by examining the striking link between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'.
It sounds like the setup for a classic, 'walks into a bar' joke, but the relationship we uncovered is no laughing matter. As we crutch-ed our way through the data, our team was floored to find a significant connection between air quality and the interest in crutch purchasing. This discovery prompted us to roll up our sleeves and delve deeper into the numbers, making sure not to stumble over statistical pitfalls along the way.
Now, you might be wondering, “What's the real reason behind this peculiar correlation?” Is it merely a limping statistical fluke, or does it hint at something more profound? Our research aims to provide some clarity on this matter, demonstrating the value of examining correlations that, at first glance, might seem as elusive as finding humor in a research paper.
As we embark on this scientific journey, we must be mindful not to jump to conclusions or hobble our way through unfounded assumptions. Instead, we will approach this connection with the utmost seriousness, all while keeping our sense of humor intact. After all, science without a little fun is like a joke without a punchline – it just doesn't hold up.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic association between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the surge in Google searches for 'where to buy crutches', our research team utilized a carefully crafted combination of data analysis and statistical wizardry. We began by tapping into the Environmental Protection Agency's treasure trove of air quality measurements, which allowed us to breathe life into our investigation. With a wink to the wise words of Freeman Dyson and a generous sprinkling of scientific curiosity, we set out to conquer this eccentric conundrum.

Our first step involved teasing apart the intricate dance of air pollutants and their potential impact on the local populace. By harnessing the power of statistical software and a good old-fashioned penchant for pattern recognition, we meticulously tracked the levels of common air pollutants – carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and particulate matter – across the years 2005 to 2023. With each inhalation of data, we unearthed a veritable goldmine of statistical correlations that beckoned us to delve deeper.

Next, we turned our attention to the digital domain, donning our virtual detective caps to immerse ourselves in the captivating world of Google Trends. Like intrepid explorers navigating the web's winding pathways, we scoured the online landscape for fluctuations in searches related to crutch procurement. Our mission was clear: to discern any notable upticks or sharp declines in interest that mirrored the ebb and flow of air quality parameters.

Armed with a rollicking spirit and a penchant for empirical rigour, we meticulously cross-referenced the temporal patterns of air quality measurements with the peaks and valleys of 'where to buy crutches' searches. The resulting avalanche of data points was subjected to rigorous statistical analyses, akin to sifting through a haystack to find the most compelling needle in the statistical hay. We applied a litany of correlation techniques, including Pearson's r, Spearman's rank correlation, and Kendall's tau, each serving as a trusty compass guiding us through the wilds of data exploration.

In the realm of statistical significance, we maintained a vigil as sharp as a freshly sharpened pencil, ensuring that our findings stood the test of statistical scrutiny. With p-values as our north star, we sailed the choppy seas of hypothesis testing, unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 and a p-value of less than 0.01. These robust statistical anchors lent unparalleled weight to our discoveries, solidifying the connection between air quality and the zest for crutch-related online quests.

As we wrangled with the data, we remained stalwart in our dedication to sound research principles, ensuring that each step of our methodology bore the stamp of scientific integrity. Our approach was as measured as a caliper's grip, minimizing the chance of spurious conclusions and embracing the whimsical dance of data with open arms. After all, in the realm of research, a dash of levity can sometimes be the missing piece that completes the statistical jigsaw puzzle.

And now, dear reader, with our methodology laid bare, follow us into the heart of our findings, where the allure of crutch-related searches and the invisible grip of air quality coalesce in a symphony of scientific wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2005 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9075396, r-squared of 0.8236281, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Crutch-ing the Numbers: A Correlational Study of Air Quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Crutches'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we crutch-ed the numbers to investigate the surprising relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and online searches for 'where to buy crutches'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team explored whether there is a tangible link between poor air quality and the interest in purchasing crutches. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2005 to 2023.

Our findings indicate a clear association between deteriorating air quality in Decatur and the surge in searches for crutches online. This unexpected connection may raise eyebrows but holds significant implications for public health and consumer behavior. Our research opens the door to further investigations into the psychological and physiological responses to environmental pollutants, as well as the quirky ways in which individuals seek solutions to discomfort, all while avoiding "falling" into hasty conclusions.

As our study provides a glimpse into the whimsical interplay of human behavior and air quality, we must not limp behind in understanding the humorous, albeit thought-provoking, dynamics at play.


-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
"A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible." - Freeman Dyson
The correlation between environmental factors and human behavior has long intrigued researchers who are not afraid to "think outside the box." Indeed, it’s often the unexpected connections that drive scientific curiosity and open new avenues for investigation. In this vein, our study takes a step back and looks at the leg of the issue by examining the striking link between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'.
It sounds like the setup for a classic, 'walks into a bar' joke, but the relationship we uncovered is no laughing matter. As we crutch-ed our way through the data, our team was floored to find a significant connection between air quality and the interest in crutch purchasing. This discovery prompted us to roll up our sleeves and delve deeper into the numbers, making sure not to stumble over statistical pitfalls along the way.
Now, you might be wondering, “What's the real reason behind this peculiar correlation?” Is it merely a limping statistical fluke, or does it hint at something more profound? Our research aims to provide some clarity on this matter, demonstrating the value of examining correlations that, at first glance, might seem as elusive as finding humor in a research paper.
As we embark on this scientific journey, we must be mindful not to jump to conclusions or hobble our way through unfounded assumptions. Instead, we will approach this connection with the utmost seriousness, all while keeping our sense of humor intact. After all, science without a little fun is like a joke without a punchline – it just doesn't hold up.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the volume of Google searches for the elusive "where to buy crutches". This correlation, as strong as an oak tree, is indicative of a substantial association between these two seemingly disparate variables. It's almost as if the air quality was whispering, "Hey, maybe it's time to start thinking about crutches!"

The r-squared value of 0.8236281 further corroborates this relationship, suggesting that approximately 82.36% of the variability in the frequency of crutch-related searches can be explained by changes in air quality. It's as if the air quality is conducting a symphony of cyber shoppers, orchestrating the ebb and flow of crutch-seeking curiosity.

Uncertainty surrounding these findings is minimal, with a p-value less than 0.01. This indicates that the probability of observing such a strong correlation purely by chance is equivalent to finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, a crutch in an internet search query.

Fig. 1 illustrates this remarkable correlation through a scatterplot, showcasing the clear, linear relationship between air quality and the interest in crutch procurement. The points on the plot align so perfectly, it's as if they were trying to march in formation – perhaps in a bid to avoid an unplanned tumble.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the frequency of online searches for crutches are indeed interconnected. The link between environmental conditions and consumer behavior is no longer a step in the dark; it's a well-illuminated path that invites further exploration and a myriad of dad jokes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Crutch-ing the Numbers: A Correlational Study of Air Quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Crutches'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we crutch-ed the numbers to investigate the surprising relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and online searches for 'where to buy crutches'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team explored whether there is a tangible link between poor air quality and the interest in purchasing crutches. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2005 to 2023.

Our findings indicate a clear association between deteriorating air quality in Decatur and the surge in searches for crutches online. This unexpected connection may raise eyebrows but holds significant implications for public health and consumer behavior. Our research opens the door to further investigations into the psychological and physiological responses to environmental pollutants, as well as the quirky ways in which individuals seek solutions to discomfort, all while avoiding "falling" into hasty conclusions.

As our study provides a glimpse into the whimsical interplay of human behavior and air quality, we must not limp behind in understanding the humorous, albeit thought-provoking, dynamics at play.


[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google searches for 'where to buy crutches' brings to mind the work of Smith (2010), who studied the impact of environmental factors on consumer behavior. Additionally, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the psychological responses to pollutants, shedding light on the intricate ways in which individuals adapt to discomfort.
However, as we tread further into the unexpected correlation between air quality and the hunt for crutches, we are reminded of the classic saying, "Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field." Similarly, our study endeavors to stand out in its field by elucidating the quirky connection between environmental conditions and consumer interests.
Turning the page of our discussion to related literature, "The Air We Breathe: Understanding Environmental Health" by John Smith provides valuable insights into the impact of air quality on human health. Building on this foundation, "Crutching Numbers: An Empirical Investigation" by Jane Doe offers a comprehensive exploration of unanticipated correlations in consumer behavior, akin to our research focus.
In the realm of fiction, the novel "The Great Crutch Caper" by James Jones takes a whimsical approach to uncovering surprising connections in a small town, mirroring our quest for understanding the seemingly improbable relationship between air quality and crutch inquiries.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is crucial to approach our topic with intellectual curiosity and a touch of levity, reminiscent of the animated series "The Magic School Bus," where unconventional connections are explored with both seriousness and a light-hearted spirit. Similarly, the playful antics of the "Paw Patrol" series remind us to approach unexpected discoveries with a sense of adventure and excitement.
In uncovering the unexpected bonds between air quality in Decatur and the quest for crutches, our research aims to bridge the gap between scientific inquiry and everyday curiosities, all while infusing the discussion with a dose of humor and whimsy. As we forge ahead, let us not forget the wise words of Albert Einstein, who said, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science."

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the volume of Google searches for the elusive "where to buy crutches". This correlation, as strong as an oak tree, is indicative of a substantial association between these two seemingly disparate variables. It's almost as if the air quality was whispering, "Hey, maybe it's time to start thinking about crutches!"
The r-squared value of 0.8236281 further corroborates this relationship, suggesting that approximately 82.36% of the variability in the frequency of crutch-related searches can be explained by changes in air quality. It's as if the air quality is conducting a symphony of cyber shoppers, orchestrating the ebb and flow of crutch-seeking curiosity.
Uncertainty surrounding these findings is minimal, with a p-value less than 0.01. This indicates that the probability of observing such a strong correlation purely by chance is equivalent to finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, a crutch in an internet search query.
Fig. 1 illustrates this remarkable correlation through a scatterplot, showcasing the clear, linear relationship between air quality and the interest in crutch procurement. The points on the plot align so perfectly, it's as if they were trying to march in formation – perhaps in a bid to avoid an unplanned tumble.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the frequency of online searches for crutches are indeed interconnected. The link between environmental conditions and consumer behavior is no longer a step in the dark; it's a well-illuminated path that invites further exploration and a myriad of dad jokes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings reveal a striking relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the surge in online searches for crutches, which may prompt one to wonder: "What did the librarian say when the books were blocking the air conditioner? Move over, fiction, it's time for some cool non-fiction!" Jokes aside, the substantial correlation coefficient and minute p-value validate the unconventional bond between environmental conditions and consumer behavior. The results illuminate a path towards understanding the peculiar ways in which individuals respond to discomfort, akin to unraveling the mystery of why skeletons are so calm – they don't get easily rattled.

Supporting prior research by Smith (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015), our study corroborates the notion that environmental factors play a significant role in shaping consumer behavior. Our findings, as compelling as a science-themed stand-up comedy show, align with the intricate psychological and physiological responses to pollutants highlighted by previous research. It's as if air quality and crutch inquiries were engaged in an unspoken dialogue, much like two chemists – it's all about the reaction.

While it may seem whimsical at first glance, our research holds serious implications for public health and consumer decision-making. The unexpected link between air quality and the interest in crutches prompts a consideration of how environmental conditions can influence not only physical well-being but also consumer choices. It's a reminder that even in the realm of statistics and research, there's always room for a lighthearted "a-ha" moment.

In light of our study, it's clear that the air we breathe may have a more profound impact on our behaviors than previously imagined. Our findings, as captivating as a compelling science fiction novel, encourage further exploration of the quirky interplay between environmental factors and consumer interests. Thus, we must not limp behind in embracing the whimsical dynamics at play and continue our journey with a spring in our step and a crutch in our hypotheses.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Crutch-ing the Numbers: A Correlational Study of Air Quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Crutches'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we crutch-ed the numbers to investigate the surprising relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and online searches for 'where to buy crutches'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team explored whether there is a tangible link between poor air quality and the interest in purchasing crutches. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2005 to 2023.

Our findings indicate a clear association between deteriorating air quality in Decatur and the surge in searches for crutches online. This unexpected connection may raise eyebrows but holds significant implications for public health and consumer behavior. Our research opens the door to further investigations into the psychological and physiological responses to environmental pollutants, as well as the quirky ways in which individuals seek solutions to discomfort, all while avoiding "falling" into hasty conclusions.

As our study provides a glimpse into the whimsical interplay of human behavior and air quality, we must not limp behind in understanding the humorous, albeit thought-provoking, dynamics at play.


[[INTRDUCTION]]
"A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible." - Freeman Dyson
The correlation between environmental factors and human behavior has long intrigued researchers who are not afraid to "think outside the box." Indeed, it’s often the unexpected connections that drive scientific curiosity and open new avenues for investigation. In this vein, our study takes a step back and looks at the leg of the issue by examining the striking link between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'.
It sounds like the setup for a classic, 'walks into a bar' joke, but the relationship we uncovered is no laughing matter. As we crutch-ed our way through the data, our team was floored to find a significant connection between air quality and the interest in crutch purchasing. This discovery prompted us to roll up our sleeves and delve deeper into the numbers, making sure not to stumble over statistical pitfalls along the way.
Now, you might be wondering, “What's the real reason behind this peculiar correlation?” Is it merely a limping statistical fluke, or does it hint at something more profound? Our research aims to provide some clarity on this matter, demonstrating the value of examining correlations that, at first glance, might seem as elusive as finding humor in a research paper.
As we embark on this scientific journey, we must be mindful not to jump to conclusions or hobble our way through unfounded assumptions. Instead, we will approach this connection with the utmost seriousness, all while keeping our sense of humor intact. After all, science without a little fun is like a joke without a punchline – it just doesn't hold up.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the volume of Google searches for the elusive "where to buy crutches". This correlation, as strong as an oak tree, is indicative of a substantial association between these two seemingly disparate variables. It's almost as if the air quality was whispering, "Hey, maybe it's time to start thinking about crutches!"
The r-squared value of 0.8236281 further corroborates this relationship, suggesting that approximately 82.36% of the variability in the frequency of crutch-related searches can be explained by changes in air quality. It's as if the air quality is conducting a symphony of cyber shoppers, orchestrating the ebb and flow of crutch-seeking curiosity.
Uncertainty surrounding these findings is minimal, with a p-value less than 0.01. This indicates that the probability of observing such a strong correlation purely by chance is equivalent to finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, a crutch in an internet search query.
Fig. 1 illustrates this remarkable correlation through a scatterplot, showcasing the clear, linear relationship between air quality and the interest in crutch procurement. The points on the plot align so perfectly, it's as if they were trying to march in formation – perhaps in a bid to avoid an unplanned tumble.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the frequency of online searches for crutches are indeed interconnected. The link between environmental conditions and consumer behavior is no longer a step in the dark; it's a well-illuminated path that invites further exploration and a myriad of dad jokes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the grand scheme of things, our research has proven to be a breath of fresh air, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and the surge in curiosity about crutches. It's almost as if the atmosphere is walking on eggshells, nervously hinting at the need for extra support. But before we jump to any conclusions, let's remember that correlation does not always equal causation. As they say, "Don't put all your crutches in one basket!"

The strength of the correlation coefficient and the p-value has left us feeling more confident than a penguin in a snowstorm – we can now say with conviction that there is a tangible link between these variables. It's as clear as seeing someone perform at a one-legged duck race – there's no denying the connection.

Our findings open the door to a world of potential research avenues – from exploring the psychological impact of air quality on mobility aids to delving into the economic implications of crutch sales in relation to environmental factors. It's like finding a hidden treasure trove of data in a sea of statistical noise – who knew that air quality and crutches could make such an intriguing pair?

In the end, our study leaves no room for doubt – much like a person on crutches, the link between air quality in Decatur and the interest in purchasing crutches is as conspicuous as a flamingo in a flock of pigeons. With such clear results, we can confidently say that no further research is needed in this area. It's time for us to take a step back, put our feet up, and offer a standing ovation to the quirky correlation we've uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Crutch-ing the Numbers: A Correlational Study of Air Quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Crutches'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Sociology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Crutch-ing the Numbers: A Correlational Study of Air Quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Crutches'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Absurd Research Endeavors and Studies (SARES)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Crutch-ing the Numbers: A Correlational Study of Air Quality in Decatur, Alabama and Google Searches for 'Where to Buy Crutches' with an abstract of In this study, we crutch-ed the numbers to investigate the surprising relationship between air quality in Decatur, Alabama and online searches for 'where to buy crutches'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team explored whether there is a tangible link between poor air quality and the interest in purchasing crutches. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9075396 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2005 to 2023.
Our findings indicate a clear association between deteriorating air quality in Decatur and the surge in searches for crutches online. This unexpected connection may raise eyebrows but holds significant implications for public health and consumer behavior. Our research opens the door to further investigations into the psychological and physiological responses to environmental pollutants, as well as the quirky ways in which individuals seek solutions to discomfort, all while avoiding "falling" into hasty conclusions.
As our study provides a glimpse into the whimsical interplay of human behavior and air quality, we must not limp behind in understanding the humorous, albeit thought-provoking, dynamics at play.

ChatGPT:

air quality, Decatur Alabama, environmental protection agency, Google trends, where to buy crutches, correlation study, crutching the numbers, public health, consumer behavior, environmental pollutants, physiological responses, human behavior, air quality and health

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Decatur, Alabama
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Decatur, AL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Decatur, Alabama

Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'where to buy crutches' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'

Correlation r = 0.9075396 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8236281 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'where to buy crutches') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Decatur, Alabama) over the 19 years from 2005 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.2E-8. 0.0000000817220984278271000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 8.2E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,236,592 random variables You don't actually need 12 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Air quality in Decatur, Alabama (Good air quality)54.035152.097942.253568.421155.279551.800668.571476.678484.042683.802882.739783.287786.813283.516583.835686.55468079.178176.2431
Google searches for 'where to buy crutches' (Rel. search volume)16.16679.58.4166717.833313.333313.833317.083317.7524.166722.666722.416721.416724.16672527.416719.83332621.333320




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([54.0351,52.0979,42.2535,68.4211,55.2795,51.8006,68.5714,76.6784,84.0426,83.8028,82.7397,83.2877,86.8132,83.5165,83.8356,86.5546,80,79.1781,76.2431,])
array_2 = np.array([16.1667,9.5,8.41667,17.8333,13.3333,13.8333,17.0833,17.75,24.1667,22.6667,22.4167,21.4167,24.1667,25,27.4167,19.8333,26,21.3333,20,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Decatur, Alabama"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'where to buy crutches'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 4833 · Black Variable ID: 20532 · Red Variable ID: 1365
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0