about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,695 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina and the second variable is Number of active magazines in the United States.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2016, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality in Rocky Mount improved, it created the perfect conditions for the trees to produce higher quality and more plentiful paper. This led to an influx of top-notch magazines being published across the United States, as the paper industry blossomed in response to the pristine air in Rocky Mount.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene, minimalist landscape set in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. Show tall, sturdy trees with vibrant green leaves towering over the landscape. The scene should depict the improved air quality nurturing the growth of high-quality, lush paper. This paper is being used for colorful magazines being printed in various publishing houses across the United States. The scene should exude tranquility and simplicity, capturing the essence of the landscape and the impact on paper production. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal Voxel art Cyberpunk An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Minimalism
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States, in the following situation: As the air quality in Rocky Mount improved, it created the perfect conditions for the trees to produce higher quality and more plentiful paper. This led to an influx of top-notch magazines being published across the United States, as the paper industry blossomed in response to the pristine air in Rocky Mount.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the serene landscape of Rocky Mount, North Carolina, the air cleared to a refreshing crispness. Tall trees in the surrounding forest grew tall and sturdy, their leaves a vibrant green. The improved air quality nurtured their growth, resulting in an abundance of high-quality, lush paper. Meanwhile, across the United States, the presses of numerous publishing houses whirred to life, churning out a colorful array of magazines that celebrated the newfound excellence of paper from Rocky Mount.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the serene landscape of Rocky Mount, North Carolina, the air cleared to a refreshing crispness. Tall trees in the surrounding forest grew tall and sturdy, their leaves a vibrant green. The improved air quality nurtured their growth, resulting in an abundance of high-quality, lush paper. Meanwhile, across the United States, the presses of numerous publishing houses whirred to life, churning out a colorful array of magazines that celebrated the newfound excellence of paper from Rocky Mount. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene, minimalist landscape set in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. Show tall, sturdy trees with vibrant green leaves towering over the landscape. The scene should depict the improved air quality nurturing the growth of high-quality, lush paper. This paper is being used for colorful magazines being printed in various publishing houses across the United States. The scene should exude tranquility and simplicity, capturing the essence of the landscape and the impact on paper production.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina caused Number of active magazines in the United States to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Air is a-Buzz: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the Number of Active Magazines in the United States

The Journal of Atmospheric Anthropology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2016.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Air is a-Buzz: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the Number of Active Magazines in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. With a keen eye for environmental factors and publishing trends, our research team ventured to uncover the subtle dance between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we pioneered an analysis that left us breathless – both from the complexity of the statistics and, admittedly, the air quality. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016, pointing to a striking relationship that cannot be brushed aside like an issue of yesterday's news.

In the midst of our rigorous analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the air of mystery surrounding this correlation. While some may dismiss it as pure coincidence, we couldn't help but breathe a sigh of relief at the statistical significance. It seems that the quality of the air in Rocky Mount isn't just a breath of fresh air – it may also influence the proliferation of periodicals across the nation.

As we sifted through the data, we couldn't shake the feeling that every breath we took was steeped in significance – much like a good dad joke, the connection between air quality and magazines is both unexpected and delightfully pun-ishing. Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship but also highlight the need for further research in this uncharted territory. After all, when it comes to the air-mazing world of publication trends, every breath counts.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Air is a-Buzz: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the Number of Active Magazines in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. With a keen eye for environmental factors and publishing trends, our research team ventured to uncover the subtle dance between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we pioneered an analysis that left us breathless – both from the complexity of the statistics and, admittedly, the air quality. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016, pointing to a striking relationship that cannot be brushed aside like an issue of yesterday's news.

In the midst of our rigorous analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the air of mystery surrounding this correlation. While some may dismiss it as pure coincidence, we couldn't help but breathe a sigh of relief at the statistical significance. It seems that the quality of the air in Rocky Mount isn't just a breath of fresh air – it may also influence the proliferation of periodicals across the nation.

As we sifted through the data, we couldn't shake the feeling that every breath we took was steeped in significance – much like a good dad joke, the connection between air quality and magazines is both unexpected and delightfully pun-ishing. Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship but also highlight the need for further research in this uncharted territory. After all, when it comes to the air-mazing world of publication trends, every breath counts.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the world continues to grapple with environmental concerns and the ever-evolving landscape of media consumption, it becomes increasingly important to explore the often unpredictable interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study seeks to unravel the connection between the air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. As we lift the veil on this unexpected correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the air of intrigue surrounding our findings.

In conducting this research, we approached the data with a blend of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity - much like how a good dad joke perfectly balances wit and pun-ishment. The initial inquiry into this connection may elicit a chuckle, akin to the reaction to a well-placed pun, but our analysis has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 – a statistical punchline that demands attention.

The correlation between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States may sound as unexpectedly fitting as a dad joke at a serious gathering, but the undeniable statistical significance underscores the need for further exploration. Beyond the initial surprise, we were struck by the potential implications of this relationship, realizing that just like a dad joke, these findings may leave a lasting impression once fully appreciated.

As we delve deeper into the intriguing intersection of air quality and publishing trends, it is clear that this connection defies the conventional wisdom of cause and effect. Rather than simply being a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental and media research, our findings suggest that the air quality in Rocky Mount may have a tangible impact on the publication patterns across the country. Just like a dad joke that prompts laughter and contemplation in equal measure, this unexpected correlation challenges existing paradigms and beckons further investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Air is a-Buzz: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the Number of Active Magazines in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. With a keen eye for environmental factors and publishing trends, our research team ventured to uncover the subtle dance between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we pioneered an analysis that left us breathless – both from the complexity of the statistics and, admittedly, the air quality. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016, pointing to a striking relationship that cannot be brushed aside like an issue of yesterday's news.

In the midst of our rigorous analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the air of mystery surrounding this correlation. While some may dismiss it as pure coincidence, we couldn't help but breathe a sigh of relief at the statistical significance. It seems that the quality of the air in Rocky Mount isn't just a breath of fresh air – it may also influence the proliferation of periodicals across the nation.

As we sifted through the data, we couldn't shake the feeling that every breath we took was steeped in significance – much like a good dad joke, the connection between air quality and magazines is both unexpected and delightfully pun-ishing. Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship but also highlight the need for further research in this uncharted territory. After all, when it comes to the air-mazing world of publication trends, every breath counts.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the world continues to grapple with environmental concerns and the ever-evolving landscape of media consumption, it becomes increasingly important to explore the often unpredictable interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study seeks to unravel the connection between the air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. As we lift the veil on this unexpected correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the air of intrigue surrounding our findings.
In conducting this research, we approached the data with a blend of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity - much like how a good dad joke perfectly balances wit and pun-ishment. The initial inquiry into this connection may elicit a chuckle, akin to the reaction to a well-placed pun, but our analysis has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 – a statistical punchline that demands attention.
The correlation between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States may sound as unexpectedly fitting as a dad joke at a serious gathering, but the undeniable statistical significance underscores the need for further exploration. Beyond the initial surprise, we were struck by the potential implications of this relationship, realizing that just like a dad joke, these findings may leave a lasting impression once fully appreciated.
As we delve deeper into the intriguing intersection of air quality and publishing trends, it is clear that this connection defies the conventional wisdom of cause and effect. Rather than simply being a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental and media research, our findings suggest that the air quality in Rocky Mount may have a tangible impact on the publication patterns across the country. Just like a dad joke that prompts laughter and contemplation in equal measure, this unexpected correlation challenges existing paradigms and beckons further investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Air Quality and Publishing Trends," Smith et al. delve into the potential relationship between air quality and media dissemination, specifically focusing on the impact of air quality on the circulation and readership of magazines. The authors find that air pollution levels have a significant negative correlation with the number of active magazines, highlighting the adverse effects of poor air quality on the vitality of print media. Furthermore, Doe's "The Invisible Influence of Air Quality" provides additional insight into the subtle yet pervasive ways in which environmental factors influence human behavior, suggesting that the presence of airborne pollutants may surreptitiously dampen the creative energy required for maintaining a robust magazine industry.

Speaking of creative energy, did you hear about the magazine about electricity? It's shocking!

Additionally, Jones' study, "Breathless: The Impact of Air Quality on Media Consumption," elucidates the notion that individuals in areas with superior air quality exhibit higher levels of engagement with print media, underlining the lingering effects of fresh air on reading habits. These scholarly works set the stage for our exploration into the unexpected correlation between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States.

Turning to non-fiction works, "Breathing Easy: A Guide to Air Quality" and "The Printing Press: A History" offer valuable perspectives on the intersection of environmental conditions and publishing dynamics. These texts contextualize our investigation by emphasizing the intricate interdependence between breathable air and the dissemination of written material, underscoring the respiration of influence that permeates the magazine industry.

On a more fictional note, "The Airbender's Almanac" and "The Literary Pollution Paradox" tap into the whimsical potential of air-related themes in literature, inviting us to ponder the fantastical implications of breathable narratives and the allegorical resonance of air as a metaphor for creativity. These imaginative works serve as a lighthearted counterpart to our research, reminding us that the winds of inspiration can take unexpected forms – much like the unexpected connections we've unraveled between air quality and magazine proliferation.

In an effort to comprehensively capture the breadth of existing knowledge, we also perused unconventional sources, including the CVS receipts we collected while anxiously waiting in line at the pharmacy. Through a meticulous analysis of these extensive scrolls of paper, we stumbled upon a plethora of air quality and magazine-related coupons and promotions, inadvertently gaining a fresh perspective on the tangible impact of air freshness on periodical patronage. Just like a never-ending CVS receipt, our journey through the literature has been both informative and unexpectedly lengthy.

We trust that our eclectic approach has effectively synthesized the existing knowledge on this captivating intersection of air quality and magazine activity, paving the way for our original contribution to this burgeoning field of inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor . You used data from 2002 to 2016

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Air is a-Buzz: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the Number of Active Magazines in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. With a keen eye for environmental factors and publishing trends, our research team ventured to uncover the subtle dance between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we pioneered an analysis that left us breathless – both from the complexity of the statistics and, admittedly, the air quality. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016, pointing to a striking relationship that cannot be brushed aside like an issue of yesterday's news.

In the midst of our rigorous analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the air of mystery surrounding this correlation. While some may dismiss it as pure coincidence, we couldn't help but breathe a sigh of relief at the statistical significance. It seems that the quality of the air in Rocky Mount isn't just a breath of fresh air – it may also influence the proliferation of periodicals across the nation.

As we sifted through the data, we couldn't shake the feeling that every breath we took was steeped in significance – much like a good dad joke, the connection between air quality and magazines is both unexpected and delightfully pun-ishing. Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship but also highlight the need for further research in this uncharted territory. After all, when it comes to the air-mazing world of publication trends, every breath counts.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the world continues to grapple with environmental concerns and the ever-evolving landscape of media consumption, it becomes increasingly important to explore the often unpredictable interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study seeks to unravel the connection between the air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. As we lift the veil on this unexpected correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the air of intrigue surrounding our findings.
In conducting this research, we approached the data with a blend of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity - much like how a good dad joke perfectly balances wit and pun-ishment. The initial inquiry into this connection may elicit a chuckle, akin to the reaction to a well-placed pun, but our analysis has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 – a statistical punchline that demands attention.
The correlation between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States may sound as unexpectedly fitting as a dad joke at a serious gathering, but the undeniable statistical significance underscores the need for further exploration. Beyond the initial surprise, we were struck by the potential implications of this relationship, realizing that just like a dad joke, these findings may leave a lasting impression once fully appreciated.
As we delve deeper into the intriguing intersection of air quality and publishing trends, it is clear that this connection defies the conventional wisdom of cause and effect. Rather than simply being a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental and media research, our findings suggest that the air quality in Rocky Mount may have a tangible impact on the publication patterns across the country. Just like a dad joke that prompts laughter and contemplation in equal measure, this unexpected correlation challenges existing paradigms and beckons further investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our research approach combined the precision of a scientific laboratory with the eclectic charm of a whimsical library, much like trying to maintain a serious demeanor while telling a dad joke. We began by collecting air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency for Rocky Mount, North Carolina. This data included measurements of common air pollutants such as ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and sulfur dioxide. We then dived into the labyrinth of publishing statistics, collecting information on the number of active magazines in the United States from the Stat Investor database. Much like the strategic placement of a pun, our data collection methods were both meticulous and infused with an element of surprise.

To ensure the reliability and representativeness of our findings, we sought to follow a methodology that balanced thoroughness and a splash of audaciousness, akin to the art of delivering a well-timed dad joke in a serious conversation. We accrued data spanning from 2002 to 2016, capturing a snapshot of both air quality dynamics and publishing trends. Our aspiration was not merely to gather data, but to create a narrative that married statistical rigor with a touch of whimsy, not unlike the cadence of a good dad joke.

Once we had amassed our detailed dataset, we employed a technique that mirrored the finesse of crafting an unexpected punchline: we conducted a correlation analysis between the air quality in Rocky Mount and the number of active magazines in the United States. This analysis allowed us to unravel the tangled web of potential associations, much like untangling the layers of meaning within a well-constructed dad joke. Utilizing statistical software, we computed the correlation coefficient and assessed the significance level, akin to waiting for the punchline of a well-timed jest.

Our research design necessitated the incorporation of control variables, including socioeconomic indicators and media consumption patterns. This approach sought to capture the multifaceted nuances of the relationship between air quality and magazine activity, not unlike the multi-layered essence of a dad joke that unveils layers of amusement with each retelling. By scrutinizing this web of interwoven variables, our aim was to construct a comprehensive framework that could accommodate the complexity of this unexpected correlation.

Finally, in the spirit of playful scientific inquiry, we conducted sensitivity analyses and robustness checks, ensuring that our findings were as sturdy as a well-crafted dad joke that withstands the test of time. These analyses comprised various statistical maneuvers to assess the stability of our results, akin to refining the delivery of a pun to elicit maximum amusement.

In summary, our methodology marries the realms of serious inquiry and lighthearted exploration, much like the delicate balance between scientific rigor and a well-timed dad joke. By juxtaposing meticulous analysis with a touch of levity, we hope to offer a research approach that not only informs but also entertains – much like the ever-surprising connection between air quality in Rocky Mount and the number of active magazines in the United States.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor .

For the time period 2002 to 2016, you found a correlation 0.9192181, r-squared of 0.8449619, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Air is a-Buzz: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the Number of Active Magazines in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. With a keen eye for environmental factors and publishing trends, our research team ventured to uncover the subtle dance between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we pioneered an analysis that left us breathless – both from the complexity of the statistics and, admittedly, the air quality. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016, pointing to a striking relationship that cannot be brushed aside like an issue of yesterday's news.

In the midst of our rigorous analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the air of mystery surrounding this correlation. While some may dismiss it as pure coincidence, we couldn't help but breathe a sigh of relief at the statistical significance. It seems that the quality of the air in Rocky Mount isn't just a breath of fresh air – it may also influence the proliferation of periodicals across the nation.

As we sifted through the data, we couldn't shake the feeling that every breath we took was steeped in significance – much like a good dad joke, the connection between air quality and magazines is both unexpected and delightfully pun-ishing. Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship but also highlight the need for further research in this uncharted territory. After all, when it comes to the air-mazing world of publication trends, every breath counts.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the world continues to grapple with environmental concerns and the ever-evolving landscape of media consumption, it becomes increasingly important to explore the often unpredictable interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study seeks to unravel the connection between the air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. As we lift the veil on this unexpected correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the air of intrigue surrounding our findings.
In conducting this research, we approached the data with a blend of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity - much like how a good dad joke perfectly balances wit and pun-ishment. The initial inquiry into this connection may elicit a chuckle, akin to the reaction to a well-placed pun, but our analysis has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 – a statistical punchline that demands attention.
The correlation between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States may sound as unexpectedly fitting as a dad joke at a serious gathering, but the undeniable statistical significance underscores the need for further exploration. Beyond the initial surprise, we were struck by the potential implications of this relationship, realizing that just like a dad joke, these findings may leave a lasting impression once fully appreciated.
As we delve deeper into the intriguing intersection of air quality and publishing trends, it is clear that this connection defies the conventional wisdom of cause and effect. Rather than simply being a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental and media research, our findings suggest that the air quality in Rocky Mount may have a tangible impact on the publication patterns across the country. Just like a dad joke that prompts laughter and contemplation in equal measure, this unexpected correlation challenges existing paradigms and beckons further investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis conducted on the data collected for the years 2002 to 2016 revealed a robust relationship between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and an r-squared value of 0.8449619 indicated a strong positive association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant connection. This result suggests that the air quality in Rocky Mount may indeed have an influence on the presence and activity of magazines across the nation.

Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot illustrating the substantial correlation between air quality in Rocky Mount and the number of active magazines in the United States. The data points are tightly clustered around the upward-sloping trend line, emphasizing the strength of the relationship. It's almost as if the data points are saying, "We're not only in the same publication, we're on the same page!"

In the realm of unexpected connections, the bond between air quality and magazine activity stands out like a punchline from a dad joke – surprising and yet oddly satisfying. Just as a well-timed pun can elicit both amusement and contemplation, this correlation challenges preconceived notions and invites further exploration.

Overall, our findings affirm the need for continued investigation into this unusual relationship, highlighting the importance of considering environmental factors in the analysis of media trends. The coalescence of air quality and publishing activity may seem as disparate as apples and oranges, but our results suggest that their interaction forms a compelling story that demands further attention.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Air is a-Buzz: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the Number of Active Magazines in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. With a keen eye for environmental factors and publishing trends, our research team ventured to uncover the subtle dance between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we pioneered an analysis that left us breathless – both from the complexity of the statistics and, admittedly, the air quality. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016, pointing to a striking relationship that cannot be brushed aside like an issue of yesterday's news.

In the midst of our rigorous analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the air of mystery surrounding this correlation. While some may dismiss it as pure coincidence, we couldn't help but breathe a sigh of relief at the statistical significance. It seems that the quality of the air in Rocky Mount isn't just a breath of fresh air – it may also influence the proliferation of periodicals across the nation.

As we sifted through the data, we couldn't shake the feeling that every breath we took was steeped in significance – much like a good dad joke, the connection between air quality and magazines is both unexpected and delightfully pun-ishing. Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship but also highlight the need for further research in this uncharted territory. After all, when it comes to the air-mazing world of publication trends, every breath counts.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Air Quality and Publishing Trends," Smith et al. delve into the potential relationship between air quality and media dissemination, specifically focusing on the impact of air quality on the circulation and readership of magazines. The authors find that air pollution levels have a significant negative correlation with the number of active magazines, highlighting the adverse effects of poor air quality on the vitality of print media. Furthermore, Doe's "The Invisible Influence of Air Quality" provides additional insight into the subtle yet pervasive ways in which environmental factors influence human behavior, suggesting that the presence of airborne pollutants may surreptitiously dampen the creative energy required for maintaining a robust magazine industry.
Speaking of creative energy, did you hear about the magazine about electricity? It's shocking!
Additionally, Jones' study, "Breathless: The Impact of Air Quality on Media Consumption," elucidates the notion that individuals in areas with superior air quality exhibit higher levels of engagement with print media, underlining the lingering effects of fresh air on reading habits. These scholarly works set the stage for our exploration into the unexpected correlation between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States.
Turning to non-fiction works, "Breathing Easy: A Guide to Air Quality" and "The Printing Press: A History" offer valuable perspectives on the intersection of environmental conditions and publishing dynamics. These texts contextualize our investigation by emphasizing the intricate interdependence between breathable air and the dissemination of written material, underscoring the respiration of influence that permeates the magazine industry.
On a more fictional note, "The Airbender's Almanac" and "The Literary Pollution Paradox" tap into the whimsical potential of air-related themes in literature, inviting us to ponder the fantastical implications of breathable narratives and the allegorical resonance of air as a metaphor for creativity. These imaginative works serve as a lighthearted counterpart to our research, reminding us that the winds of inspiration can take unexpected forms – much like the unexpected connections we've unraveled between air quality and magazine proliferation.
In an effort to comprehensively capture the breadth of existing knowledge, we also perused unconventional sources, including the CVS receipts we collected while anxiously waiting in line at the pharmacy. Through a meticulous analysis of these extensive scrolls of paper, we stumbled upon a plethora of air quality and magazine-related coupons and promotions, inadvertently gaining a fresh perspective on the tangible impact of air freshness on periodical patronage. Just like a never-ending CVS receipt, our journey through the literature has been both informative and unexpectedly lengthy.
We trust that our eclectic approach has effectively synthesized the existing knowledge on this captivating intersection of air quality and magazine activity, paving the way for our original contribution to this burgeoning field of inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis conducted on the data collected for the years 2002 to 2016 revealed a robust relationship between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and an r-squared value of 0.8449619 indicated a strong positive association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant connection. This result suggests that the air quality in Rocky Mount may indeed have an influence on the presence and activity of magazines across the nation.
Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot illustrating the substantial correlation between air quality in Rocky Mount and the number of active magazines in the United States. The data points are tightly clustered around the upward-sloping trend line, emphasizing the strength of the relationship. It's almost as if the data points are saying, "We're not only in the same publication, we're on the same page!"
In the realm of unexpected connections, the bond between air quality and magazine activity stands out like a punchline from a dad joke – surprising and yet oddly satisfying. Just as a well-timed pun can elicit both amusement and contemplation, this correlation challenges preconceived notions and invites further exploration.
Overall, our findings affirm the need for continued investigation into this unusual relationship, highlighting the importance of considering environmental factors in the analysis of media trends. The coalescence of air quality and publishing activity may seem as disparate as apples and oranges, but our results suggest that their interaction forms a compelling story that demands further attention.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The pronounced correlation between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States, as evidenced by our study, recommends further exploration into the intriguing interplay between environmental conditions and publishing industry dynamics. While on the surface this connection may seem as unexpected as finding a "periodic" table in a magazine, our results suggest a meaningful relationship that warrants serious consideration.

Our findings align with the assertions put forth by Smith et al., Doe, and Jones, who, like a delightful series of jests, first brought attention to the potential impact of air quality on media dissemination. Their astute explorations into the adverse effects of air pollution on the readership of magazines and the creative energy required for maintaining a thriving magazine industry echo the compelling relationship we have unearthed. It's as if these researchers were not merely turning the page but setting the stage for our own air-raising findings.

Moreover, our results stand as a testament to the vital contributions of "Breathing Easy: A Guide to Air Quality" and "The Printing Press: A History," which provided a contextual framework for understanding the intricate dynamics that underpin our investigation. The symbiotic interplay between breathable air and the dissemination of written material finds resonance in our own discovery, much like an unexpected punchline that ties together a series of seemingly disconnected anecdotes.

In addition, our analysis lends support to the more imaginative perspectives presented in "The Airbender's Almanac" and "The Literary Pollution Paradox," which, while delivering whimsical content, urged us to contemplate the allegorical resonance of air and the unexpected implications of breathable narratives. Our research has, in a sense, breathed life into these fanciful musings, transforming them into tangible empirical evidence of a correlation that cannot be simply swept under the rug.

While our findings may seem as surprising as realizing that a magazine about electricity could be truly "shocking," they reflect the nuanced ways in which environmental factors can intersect with media consumption patterns. The comprehensive, if unintentional, insights gleaned from perusing CVS receipts further emphasize the tangible impact of air quality on periodical patronage, adding an unexpected layer to our investigation. It seems that, much like the plot twist in a tantalizing novel, the connection between air quality and magazine activity has left us both amused and enriched by its implications.

As we press on with our research, it is clear that the marriage of air quality and publishing dynamics forms a compelling narrative that calls for continued exploration. Much like the unexpected depth of a well-crafted dad joke, the union of environmental conditions and media trends may surprise, challenge, and inspire further inquiry. It's an unexpected duo, but as our research has shown, the air is indeed abuzz with possibilities, much like a good dad joke always leaves us on the edge of our seats, waiting for the next irresistible zinger.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Air is a-Buzz: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the Number of Active Magazines in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. With a keen eye for environmental factors and publishing trends, our research team ventured to uncover the subtle dance between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we pioneered an analysis that left us breathless – both from the complexity of the statistics and, admittedly, the air quality. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016, pointing to a striking relationship that cannot be brushed aside like an issue of yesterday's news.

In the midst of our rigorous analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the air of mystery surrounding this correlation. While some may dismiss it as pure coincidence, we couldn't help but breathe a sigh of relief at the statistical significance. It seems that the quality of the air in Rocky Mount isn't just a breath of fresh air – it may also influence the proliferation of periodicals across the nation.

As we sifted through the data, we couldn't shake the feeling that every breath we took was steeped in significance – much like a good dad joke, the connection between air quality and magazines is both unexpected and delightfully pun-ishing. Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship but also highlight the need for further research in this uncharted territory. After all, when it comes to the air-mazing world of publication trends, every breath counts.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the world continues to grapple with environmental concerns and the ever-evolving landscape of media consumption, it becomes increasingly important to explore the often unpredictable interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study seeks to unravel the connection between the air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. As we lift the veil on this unexpected correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the air of intrigue surrounding our findings.
In conducting this research, we approached the data with a blend of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity - much like how a good dad joke perfectly balances wit and pun-ishment. The initial inquiry into this connection may elicit a chuckle, akin to the reaction to a well-placed pun, but our analysis has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 – a statistical punchline that demands attention.
The correlation between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States may sound as unexpectedly fitting as a dad joke at a serious gathering, but the undeniable statistical significance underscores the need for further exploration. Beyond the initial surprise, we were struck by the potential implications of this relationship, realizing that just like a dad joke, these findings may leave a lasting impression once fully appreciated.
As we delve deeper into the intriguing intersection of air quality and publishing trends, it is clear that this connection defies the conventional wisdom of cause and effect. Rather than simply being a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental and media research, our findings suggest that the air quality in Rocky Mount may have a tangible impact on the publication patterns across the country. Just like a dad joke that prompts laughter and contemplation in equal measure, this unexpected correlation challenges existing paradigms and beckons further investigation.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis conducted on the data collected for the years 2002 to 2016 revealed a robust relationship between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and an r-squared value of 0.8449619 indicated a strong positive association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant connection. This result suggests that the air quality in Rocky Mount may indeed have an influence on the presence and activity of magazines across the nation.
Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot illustrating the substantial correlation between air quality in Rocky Mount and the number of active magazines in the United States. The data points are tightly clustered around the upward-sloping trend line, emphasizing the strength of the relationship. It's almost as if the data points are saying, "We're not only in the same publication, we're on the same page!"
In the realm of unexpected connections, the bond between air quality and magazine activity stands out like a punchline from a dad joke – surprising and yet oddly satisfying. Just as a well-timed pun can elicit both amusement and contemplation, this correlation challenges preconceived notions and invites further exploration.
Overall, our findings affirm the need for continued investigation into this unusual relationship, highlighting the importance of considering environmental factors in the analysis of media trends. The coalescence of air quality and publishing activity may seem as disparate as apples and oranges, but our results suggest that their interaction forms a compelling story that demands further attention.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
As we draw the curtain on our exploration of the connection between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States, we can't help but exhale a well-deserved sigh of relief – much like after a good dad joke, our findings both entertain and enlighten. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016 certainly make a compelling case for the influence of air quality on the nation's magazine activity.

Similar to how a perfectly timed dad joke can catch us off guard, the revelation of this unexpected connection has left us both amused and contemplative, highlighting the intricate interplay between environmental factors and publishing trends. It seems that the air in Rocky Mount might not only be a breath of fresh air but also a muse for the creative musings gracing magazines across the country. It's as if the quality of the air has been whispering puns of publishing success all along.

Our scatterplot, much like a well-constructed punchline, illustrates the tight-knit relationship between air quality in Rocky Mount and the number of active magazines in the United States. The data points seem to harmonize in a chorus of unexpected chemistry, reminiscent of the seamless delivery of a perfectly timed dad joke.

In light of these compelling findings, it is clear that the unexpected correlation between air quality and magazine activity deserves to be celebrated – or perhaps commemorated in a publication of its own. Nevertheless, just like the punchline of a dad joke, this correlation has left a lasting impact, prompting us to strongly assert that no further investigation is needed in this area. Our analysis has delivered the comedic relief and scientific insight to definitively close this chapter on the air-ily entertaining relationship between air quality and the world of magazines.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Air is a-Buzz: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the Number of Active Magazines in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Atmospheric Anthropology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Air is a-Buzz: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the Number of Active Magazines in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Airborne Periodical Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Air is a-Buzz: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the Number of Active Magazines in the United States with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing connection between air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. With a keen eye for environmental factors and publishing trends, our research team ventured to uncover the subtle dance between these seemingly unrelated variables.
Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we pioneered an analysis that left us breathless – both from the complexity of the statistics and, admittedly, the air quality. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9192181 and p < 0.01 for the years 2002 to 2016, pointing to a striking relationship that cannot be brushed aside like an issue of yesterday's news.
In the midst of our rigorous analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the air of mystery surrounding this correlation. While some may dismiss it as pure coincidence, we couldn't help but breathe a sigh of relief at the statistical significance. It seems that the quality of the air in Rocky Mount isn't just a breath of fresh air – it may also influence the proliferation of periodicals across the nation.
As we sifted through the data, we couldn't shake the feeling that every breath we took was steeped in significance – much like a good dad joke, the connection between air quality and magazines is both unexpected and delightfully pun-ishing. Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship but also highlight the need for further research in this uncharted territory. After all, when it comes to the air-mazing world of publication trends, every breath counts.

ChatGPT:

"air quality, Rocky Mount, North Carolina, magazines, United States, correlation, analysis, environmental factors, publishing trends, statistical significance, correlation coefficient, EPA data, Stat Investor, periodicals, proliferation, relationship analysis"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good or moderate air quality in Rocky Mount, NC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina

Number of active magazines in the United States
Source: Stat Investor
See what else correlates with Number of active magazines in the United States

Correlation r = 0.9192181 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8449619 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of active magazines in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina) over the 15 years from 2002 through 2016.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-6. 0.0000012760749323292786000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00013% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 783,653 random variables You don't actually need 783 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016
Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina (Good air quality)0.8339620.9346150.9772730.9318180.9735850.9305020.9610890.9962830.9847910.976510.9888580.99723111
Number of active magazines in the United States (Magazines)534062347188632567346809738371107163717973907240728972937216




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.833962,0.934615,0.977273,0.931818,0.973585,0.930502,0.961089,0.996283,0.984791,0.97651,0.988858,0.99723,1,1,1,])
array_2 = np.array([5340,6234,7188,6325,6734,6809,7383,7110,7163,7179,7390,7240,7289,7293,7216,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Rocky Mount, North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Number of active magazines in the United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 4695 · Black Variable ID: 21683 · Red Variable ID: 382
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0