about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,535 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The mesmerizing details of nature's intricacies in Deep Look videos have inspired car seat designers to rethink comfort and functionality, inadvertently leading to a wave of automotive seat recalls. As more people tuned in to marvel at the wonders of the natural world, car manufacturers found themselves scrambling to create seats that catered to the diverse preferences of both humans and the myriad creatures featured in the videos. The connection between the mesmerizing beauty of deep sea creatures and the need for lumbar support in car seats became undeniable, prompting a renaissance in automotive seating that no one could have predicted. The end result? A bizarre but strangely delightful collision of nature and technology, all thanks to the unexpectedly influential power of YouTube.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showing a stunning YouTube video of a vibrant deep sea creature in the mesmerizing Deep Look series. The intricate details of the creature's movement and features are highlighted, drawing in a large audience. In the background, include a fleet of cars being recalled due to issues with their seats, with engineers and designers examining and brainstorming improvements. The unexpected connection between the captivating natural world and the demand for enhanced automotive seating should be evident, creating a unique and unexpected juxtaposition. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Parallax art Cyber folk a funny image you would see on reddit Futuristic
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats, in the following situation: The mesmerizing details of nature's intricacies in Deep Look videos have inspired car seat designers to rethink comfort and functionality, inadvertently leading to a wave of automotive seat recalls. As more people tuned in to marvel at the wonders of the natural world, car manufacturers found themselves scrambling to create seats that catered to the diverse preferences of both humans and the myriad creatures featured in the videos. The connection between the mesmerizing beauty of deep sea creatures and the need for lumbar support in car seats became undeniable, prompting a renaissance in automotive seating that no one could have predicted. The end result? A bizarre but strangely delightful collision of nature and technology, all thanks to the unexpectedly influential power of YouTube.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the visual scene, we see a stunning YouTube video of a vibrant deep sea creature captured in the mesmerizing Deep Look series. The intricate details of the creature's movement and features are highlighted, drawing in a large audience. In the background, we also see a fleet of cars being recalled due to issues with their seats, with engineers and designers examining and brainstorming improvements. The unexpected connection between the captivating natural world and the demand for enhanced automotive seating is evident, creating a unique and unexpected juxtaposition.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In the visual scene, we see a stunning YouTube video of a vibrant deep sea creature captured in the mesmerizing Deep Look series. The intricate details of the creature's movement and features are highlighted, drawing in a large audience. In the background, we also see a fleet of cars being recalled due to issues with their seats, with engineers and designers examining and brainstorming improvements. The unexpected connection between the captivating natural world and the demand for enhanced automotive seating is evident, creating a unique and unexpected juxtaposition. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showing a stunning YouTube video of a vibrant deep sea creature in the mesmerizing Deep Look series. The intricate details of the creature's movement and features are highlighted, drawing in a large audience. In the background, include a fleet of cars being recalled due to issues with their seats, with engineers and designers examining and brainstorming improvements. The unexpected connection between the captivating natural world and the demand for enhanced automotive seating should be evident, creating a unique and unexpected juxtaposition.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos positively influenced Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Views on Seats: The YouTube Connection Between Average Views of Deep Look Videos and Automotive Recalls for Seat Issues

The Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Pop Culture and Product Safety

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from YouTube and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Views on Seats: The YouTube Connection Between Average Views of Deep Look Videos and Automotive Recalls for Seat Issues"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves deep into the unexpected intersection of YouTube popularity and automotive safety, particularly focusing on the correlation between average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for issues with the seats. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, our research team aimed to shed light on this phenomenon and revel in the seat-raining results.

Drawing from a mix of data sources, including YouTube analytics and U.S. Department of Transportation records, our study unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 and p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings uncovered a "seat-ing" relationship between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, prompting us to affirm that when it comes to safety concerns, the "view" on seats truly matters.

To complement our rigorous statistical analysis, our research team couldn't resist throwing in a relevant dad joke: Why did the car feel insecure? Because it had "auto"matic "recalls" about its seats!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Views on Seats: The YouTube Connection Between Average Views of Deep Look Videos and Automotive Recalls for Seat Issues"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves deep into the unexpected intersection of YouTube popularity and automotive safety, particularly focusing on the correlation between average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for issues with the seats. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, our research team aimed to shed light on this phenomenon and revel in the seat-raining results.

Drawing from a mix of data sources, including YouTube analytics and U.S. Department of Transportation records, our study unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 and p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings uncovered a "seat-ing" relationship between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, prompting us to affirm that when it comes to safety concerns, the "view" on seats truly matters.

To complement our rigorous statistical analysis, our research team couldn't resist throwing in a relevant dad joke: Why did the car feel insecure? Because it had "auto"matic "recalls" about its seats!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The automotive industry has long been at the forefront of technological innovation and engineering excellence, striving to ensure the safety and comfort of drivers and passengers alike. However, amidst the roar of engines and the hum of electronic systems, the humble yet pivotal component of automotive seating has garnered attention in both unexpected and unprecedented ways.

As automotive manufacturers constantly seek to improve the ergonomics and safety features of their seat designs, the spotlight has also turned to the digital realm, specifically YouTube, as a potential barometer of public sentiment and interest in automotive-related content. In this context, our research seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos, known for their captivating visual narratives, and automotive recalls pertaining to seat-related issues.

The correlation between YouTube viewership and automotive safety recalls may seem like a puzzling pairing at first glance, akin to finding a screwdriver in a bag of mixed nuts – unexpected, yet intriguing. However, as we delve deeper into the realm of data analysis, the threads of connection between these seemingly disparate elements begin to unravel, much like a well-worn car seat cover.

It is well known that seat-related recalls can present significant safety concerns for vehicle occupants, and are often the subject of intense scrutiny and remedial action by manufacturers and regulatory bodies. Meanwhile, the rise of digital platforms such as YouTube has ushered in a new era of information dissemination and consumer engagement, potentially influencing public perceptions and preferences in the automotive domain.

Our study embarks on a quest to uncover the pertinence of YouTube viewership, often an arena for feline antics and DIY enthusiasts, in relation to the safety and design of automotive seating. Perhaps it is time to integrate a new facet into the phrase "seat belt", reflecting not just physical fastening, but also the digital "views" that fasten public attention and interest.

Speaking of attention, here’s a dad joke that aligns with our research focus: Why did the minivan go to therapy? Because it had way too many "seating" issues!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Views on Seats: The YouTube Connection Between Average Views of Deep Look Videos and Automotive Recalls for Seat Issues"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves deep into the unexpected intersection of YouTube popularity and automotive safety, particularly focusing on the correlation between average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for issues with the seats. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, our research team aimed to shed light on this phenomenon and revel in the seat-raining results.

Drawing from a mix of data sources, including YouTube analytics and U.S. Department of Transportation records, our study unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 and p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings uncovered a "seat-ing" relationship between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, prompting us to affirm that when it comes to safety concerns, the "view" on seats truly matters.

To complement our rigorous statistical analysis, our research team couldn't resist throwing in a relevant dad joke: Why did the car feel insecure? Because it had "auto"matic "recalls" about its seats!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The automotive industry has long been at the forefront of technological innovation and engineering excellence, striving to ensure the safety and comfort of drivers and passengers alike. However, amidst the roar of engines and the hum of electronic systems, the humble yet pivotal component of automotive seating has garnered attention in both unexpected and unprecedented ways.
As automotive manufacturers constantly seek to improve the ergonomics and safety features of their seat designs, the spotlight has also turned to the digital realm, specifically YouTube, as a potential barometer of public sentiment and interest in automotive-related content. In this context, our research seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos, known for their captivating visual narratives, and automotive recalls pertaining to seat-related issues.
The correlation between YouTube viewership and automotive safety recalls may seem like a puzzling pairing at first glance, akin to finding a screwdriver in a bag of mixed nuts – unexpected, yet intriguing. However, as we delve deeper into the realm of data analysis, the threads of connection between these seemingly disparate elements begin to unravel, much like a well-worn car seat cover.
It is well known that seat-related recalls can present significant safety concerns for vehicle occupants, and are often the subject of intense scrutiny and remedial action by manufacturers and regulatory bodies. Meanwhile, the rise of digital platforms such as YouTube has ushered in a new era of information dissemination and consumer engagement, potentially influencing public perceptions and preferences in the automotive domain.
Our study embarks on a quest to uncover the pertinence of YouTube viewership, often an arena for feline antics and DIY enthusiasts, in relation to the safety and design of automotive seating. Perhaps it is time to integrate a new facet into the phrase "seat belt", reflecting not just physical fastening, but also the digital "views" that fasten public attention and interest.
Speaking of attention, here’s a dad joke that aligns with our research focus: Why did the minivan go to therapy? Because it had way too many "seating" issues!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previously, several studies have delved into the relationship between consumer engagement with digital content and product safety, exploring the potential influence of online platforms on public perceptions and purchasing behavior (Smith, 2016; Doe, 2018). However, an unexpected intersection emerges when considering the relationship between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues. Combining quantitative and qualitative analysis, our research seeks to unveil the tantalizing correlation between these seemingly disparate variables, akin to finding a car manual tucked into a cookbook - surprising, yet with potential for an intriguing hybrid recipe.

In "The Connection Between Online Engagement and Product Safety," Smith and colleagues highlight the significance of online platforms in shaping consumer attitudes and decision-making processes. Similarly, Doe's work on "Consumer Behavior in the Digital Age" showcases the profound impact of digital content on product perception and trust. However, our research aims to paint a grander picture – one where YouTube views and automotive recalls blend together like a smooth mixture of oil and vinegar, creating a dressing for a thought-provoking salad of statistical significance.

Turning to the broader realm of literature and popular culture, industry-specific reflections on automotive safety and design can be found in non-fiction works such as "Car Safety Innovations: Past, Present, and Future" and "The Art of Automotive Ergonomics: Balancing Comfort and Safety." Meanwhile, fiction novels like "Ride of the Furious Seats" and "The Recalled Roadtrip" offer a whimsical yet insightful look at the intricate interplay between vehicle seating and unforeseen adventures. While these literary explorations provide valuable context, our research goes beyond the pages of traditional texts, venturing into the digital landscape of YouTube and automotive recall databases like a fearless explorer on a quest for statistical treasure.

Our literature review also extends to unconventional sources, including anecdotal accounts from car enthusiasts, analysis of automotive-themed memes, and even a few witticisms scribbled on the back of old parking tickets. While unconventional, these sources provide a multidimensional understanding of the complex relationship between public engagement with automotive content and real-world safety implications. As we embrace the unexpected journey of research, we acknowledge the richness of insights gained from diverse and unorthodox channels, much like discovering a hidden compartment underneath a car seat, stocked with valuable data and a few forgotten french fries.

Speaking of valuable, here's a relevant dad joke to light up the scholarly atmosphere: Why did the math book look so sad? Because it had too many problems. Just like automotive recalls – a real tear-jerker!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and US DOT . You used data from 2014 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Views on Seats: The YouTube Connection Between Average Views of Deep Look Videos and Automotive Recalls for Seat Issues"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves deep into the unexpected intersection of YouTube popularity and automotive safety, particularly focusing on the correlation between average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for issues with the seats. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, our research team aimed to shed light on this phenomenon and revel in the seat-raining results.

Drawing from a mix of data sources, including YouTube analytics and U.S. Department of Transportation records, our study unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 and p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings uncovered a "seat-ing" relationship between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, prompting us to affirm that when it comes to safety concerns, the "view" on seats truly matters.

To complement our rigorous statistical analysis, our research team couldn't resist throwing in a relevant dad joke: Why did the car feel insecure? Because it had "auto"matic "recalls" about its seats!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The automotive industry has long been at the forefront of technological innovation and engineering excellence, striving to ensure the safety and comfort of drivers and passengers alike. However, amidst the roar of engines and the hum of electronic systems, the humble yet pivotal component of automotive seating has garnered attention in both unexpected and unprecedented ways.
As automotive manufacturers constantly seek to improve the ergonomics and safety features of their seat designs, the spotlight has also turned to the digital realm, specifically YouTube, as a potential barometer of public sentiment and interest in automotive-related content. In this context, our research seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos, known for their captivating visual narratives, and automotive recalls pertaining to seat-related issues.
The correlation between YouTube viewership and automotive safety recalls may seem like a puzzling pairing at first glance, akin to finding a screwdriver in a bag of mixed nuts – unexpected, yet intriguing. However, as we delve deeper into the realm of data analysis, the threads of connection between these seemingly disparate elements begin to unravel, much like a well-worn car seat cover.
It is well known that seat-related recalls can present significant safety concerns for vehicle occupants, and are often the subject of intense scrutiny and remedial action by manufacturers and regulatory bodies. Meanwhile, the rise of digital platforms such as YouTube has ushered in a new era of information dissemination and consumer engagement, potentially influencing public perceptions and preferences in the automotive domain.
Our study embarks on a quest to uncover the pertinence of YouTube viewership, often an arena for feline antics and DIY enthusiasts, in relation to the safety and design of automotive seating. Perhaps it is time to integrate a new facet into the phrase "seat belt", reflecting not just physical fastening, but also the digital "views" that fasten public attention and interest.
Speaking of attention, here’s a dad joke that aligns with our research focus: Why did the minivan go to therapy? Because it had way too many "seating" issues!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To ascertain the peculiar relationship between average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, our research team embarked on a journey as intricate and twisty as a winding road. The first step was to collect an extensive dataset encompassing YouTube analytics and U.S. Department of Transportation records from the 2014-2022 period – akin to gathering a toolbox full of statistical spanners and wrenches to tackle this enigmatic correlation.

We then utilized a multi-layered, algorithmically enhanced approach for data cleaning and filtering, akin to meticulously inspecting and fine-tuning the inner workings of an automotive seating mechanism. This procedure involved sifting through a myriad of YouTube video metadata, including views, likes, dislikes, and comments, to extract the data nuggets relevant to our study – a process as detailed as conducting a thorough inspection of seating upholstery for potential defects.

Furthermore, armed with robust statistical software and a hefty dose of caffeine, we performed a series of regression analyses and correlation tests to unravel the statistical "seat-rets" binding YouTube viewership to automotive recalls for seat-related issues. Leveraging complex modeling techniques, our approach aimed to untangle the web of influence and causality, much like navigating the twisted lanes of an automotive recall investigation.

Amidst the number crunching and data wrangling, we striving to uphold the principle of transparency and reproducibility – much like ensuring the integrity of a seatbelt buckle. As such, the methodologies employed were documented with meticulous precision, resembling the detailed schematics of a car seat's safety mechanism.

In the spirit of shedding light on our unexpected findings, here's a fitting dad joke: Why don't car seats ever get invited to parties? Because they're always "buckled" down with their seat belts!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and US DOT .

For the time period 2014 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8451492, r-squared of 0.7142772, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Views on Seats: The YouTube Connection Between Average Views of Deep Look Videos and Automotive Recalls for Seat Issues"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves deep into the unexpected intersection of YouTube popularity and automotive safety, particularly focusing on the correlation between average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for issues with the seats. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, our research team aimed to shed light on this phenomenon and revel in the seat-raining results.

Drawing from a mix of data sources, including YouTube analytics and U.S. Department of Transportation records, our study unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 and p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings uncovered a "seat-ing" relationship between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, prompting us to affirm that when it comes to safety concerns, the "view" on seats truly matters.

To complement our rigorous statistical analysis, our research team couldn't resist throwing in a relevant dad joke: Why did the car feel insecure? Because it had "auto"matic "recalls" about its seats!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The automotive industry has long been at the forefront of technological innovation and engineering excellence, striving to ensure the safety and comfort of drivers and passengers alike. However, amidst the roar of engines and the hum of electronic systems, the humble yet pivotal component of automotive seating has garnered attention in both unexpected and unprecedented ways.
As automotive manufacturers constantly seek to improve the ergonomics and safety features of their seat designs, the spotlight has also turned to the digital realm, specifically YouTube, as a potential barometer of public sentiment and interest in automotive-related content. In this context, our research seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos, known for their captivating visual narratives, and automotive recalls pertaining to seat-related issues.
The correlation between YouTube viewership and automotive safety recalls may seem like a puzzling pairing at first glance, akin to finding a screwdriver in a bag of mixed nuts – unexpected, yet intriguing. However, as we delve deeper into the realm of data analysis, the threads of connection between these seemingly disparate elements begin to unravel, much like a well-worn car seat cover.
It is well known that seat-related recalls can present significant safety concerns for vehicle occupants, and are often the subject of intense scrutiny and remedial action by manufacturers and regulatory bodies. Meanwhile, the rise of digital platforms such as YouTube has ushered in a new era of information dissemination and consumer engagement, potentially influencing public perceptions and preferences in the automotive domain.
Our study embarks on a quest to uncover the pertinence of YouTube viewership, often an arena for feline antics and DIY enthusiasts, in relation to the safety and design of automotive seating. Perhaps it is time to integrate a new facet into the phrase "seat belt", reflecting not just physical fastening, but also the digital "views" that fasten public attention and interest.
Speaking of attention, here’s a dad joke that aligns with our research focus: Why did the minivan go to therapy? Because it had way too many "seating" issues!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a significant correlation between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues. The correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 indicates a strong positive relationship between these variables, demonstrating that as the average views of Deep Look videos increase, automotive recalls for seat-related issues also tend to increase. This unexpected connection provides insight into the potential influence of digital content on public awareness and automotive safety measures.

The r-squared value of 0.7142772 further supports the strength of the relationship between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues. This indicates that approximately 71.43% of the variability in automotive recalls for seat-related issues can be explained by the average views of Deep Look videos. In other words, the popularity of Deep Look videos on YouTube appears to be a substantial factor in predicting the occurrence of automotive recalls related to seat issues.

As for the p-value, which is less than 0.01, it indicates that the observed correlation between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues is statistically significant. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship by random chance is extremely low, providing strong evidence to support the validity of the correlation.

In essence, our research findings highlight the intriguing association between digital content consumption and automotive safety concerns, emphasizing the need for further exploration and consideration of non-traditional influencers in the automotive industry.

And speaking of influencers, here's a dad joke that fits right into our findings: Why did the seat go to therapy? Because it had too many "re-calls" to mind!

The accompanying scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, further substantiating our research findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Views on Seats: The YouTube Connection Between Average Views of Deep Look Videos and Automotive Recalls for Seat Issues"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves deep into the unexpected intersection of YouTube popularity and automotive safety, particularly focusing on the correlation between average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for issues with the seats. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, our research team aimed to shed light on this phenomenon and revel in the seat-raining results.

Drawing from a mix of data sources, including YouTube analytics and U.S. Department of Transportation records, our study unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 and p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings uncovered a "seat-ing" relationship between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, prompting us to affirm that when it comes to safety concerns, the "view" on seats truly matters.

To complement our rigorous statistical analysis, our research team couldn't resist throwing in a relevant dad joke: Why did the car feel insecure? Because it had "auto"matic "recalls" about its seats!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previously, several studies have delved into the relationship between consumer engagement with digital content and product safety, exploring the potential influence of online platforms on public perceptions and purchasing behavior (Smith, 2016; Doe, 2018). However, an unexpected intersection emerges when considering the relationship between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues. Combining quantitative and qualitative analysis, our research seeks to unveil the tantalizing correlation between these seemingly disparate variables, akin to finding a car manual tucked into a cookbook - surprising, yet with potential for an intriguing hybrid recipe.
In "The Connection Between Online Engagement and Product Safety," Smith and colleagues highlight the significance of online platforms in shaping consumer attitudes and decision-making processes. Similarly, Doe's work on "Consumer Behavior in the Digital Age" showcases the profound impact of digital content on product perception and trust. However, our research aims to paint a grander picture – one where YouTube views and automotive recalls blend together like a smooth mixture of oil and vinegar, creating a dressing for a thought-provoking salad of statistical significance.
Turning to the broader realm of literature and popular culture, industry-specific reflections on automotive safety and design can be found in non-fiction works such as "Car Safety Innovations: Past, Present, and Future" and "The Art of Automotive Ergonomics: Balancing Comfort and Safety." Meanwhile, fiction novels like "Ride of the Furious Seats" and "The Recalled Roadtrip" offer a whimsical yet insightful look at the intricate interplay between vehicle seating and unforeseen adventures. While these literary explorations provide valuable context, our research goes beyond the pages of traditional texts, venturing into the digital landscape of YouTube and automotive recall databases like a fearless explorer on a quest for statistical treasure.
Our literature review also extends to unconventional sources, including anecdotal accounts from car enthusiasts, analysis of automotive-themed memes, and even a few witticisms scribbled on the back of old parking tickets. While unconventional, these sources provide a multidimensional understanding of the complex relationship between public engagement with automotive content and real-world safety implications. As we embrace the unexpected journey of research, we acknowledge the richness of insights gained from diverse and unorthodox channels, much like discovering a hidden compartment underneath a car seat, stocked with valuable data and a few forgotten french fries.
Speaking of valuable, here's a relevant dad joke to light up the scholarly atmosphere: Why did the math book look so sad? Because it had too many problems. Just like automotive recalls – a real tear-jerker!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a significant correlation between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues. The correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 indicates a strong positive relationship between these variables, demonstrating that as the average views of Deep Look videos increase, automotive recalls for seat-related issues also tend to increase. This unexpected connection provides insight into the potential influence of digital content on public awareness and automotive safety measures.
The r-squared value of 0.7142772 further supports the strength of the relationship between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues. This indicates that approximately 71.43% of the variability in automotive recalls for seat-related issues can be explained by the average views of Deep Look videos. In other words, the popularity of Deep Look videos on YouTube appears to be a substantial factor in predicting the occurrence of automotive recalls related to seat issues.
As for the p-value, which is less than 0.01, it indicates that the observed correlation between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues is statistically significant. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship by random chance is extremely low, providing strong evidence to support the validity of the correlation.
In essence, our research findings highlight the intriguing association between digital content consumption and automotive safety concerns, emphasizing the need for further exploration and consideration of non-traditional influencers in the automotive industry.
And speaking of influencers, here's a dad joke that fits right into our findings: Why did the seat go to therapy? Because it had too many "re-calls" to mind!
The accompanying scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, further substantiating our research findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has unearthed a captivating connection between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, revealing a statistically significant correlation that invites a deeper consideration of digital content's impact on automotive safety. Our results echo the prior research's elucidation of the potent influence of online platforms on consumer attitudes (Smith, 2016; Doe, 2018). Both old and new, our findings add a layer of complexity to this phenomenon, akin to discovering a hidden compartment underneath a car seat, filled with intriguing and statistically valuable insights.

The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 reinforces the influential relationship between YouTube viewership and automotive recalls, validating the idea that online engagement acts as a potent influencer in shaping public awareness of automotive safety. This finding affirms the significance of digital content as a catalyst for consumer perceptions and decision-making, aligning with the literature's emphasis on the impact of online platforms on product safety (Smith, 2016). It's as convincing as finding a seatbelt in your car – you know it's there, but its effectiveness is still surprising.

Furthermore, the robust r-squared value of 0.7142772 underscores the substantial role played by the average views of Deep Look videos in predicting automotive recalls for seat-related issues. This statistical evidence puts the spotlight on the far-reaching effects of digital content consumption, demonstrating that the popularity of YouTube videos can foreshadow real-world safety implications. It's like predicting a bumpy ride based on the number of seat adjustment buttons in a car - unexpectedly accurate.

The strikingly low p-value, less than 0.01, provides resounding support for the statistical validity of the observed correlation, affirming that the relationship between YouTube viewership and automotive recalls is no mere chance occurrence. This finding encapsulates the crux of our research – that the link between online engagement and safety concerns in the automotive realm is not to be taken lightly. It's as unlikely as finding a convertible bench seat in a sports car – statistically significant and utterly surprising.

Our research has illuminated the profound relationship between average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, paving the way for increased attention to non-traditional influencers in automotive safety. As we delve deeper into the digital landscape, the unexpected intertwining of YouTube viewership and automotive recalls fosters a newfound appreciation for the multifaceted dynamics at play, akin to uncovering a trove of statistical treasure in the unlikeliest of places.

Speaking of unlikely places, here's a fitting dad joke: Why did the car feel tired? Because it had been "re"called so many times, it needed a "seat" where it could "re-cline" and "re-lax"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Views on Seats: The YouTube Connection Between Average Views of Deep Look Videos and Automotive Recalls for Seat Issues"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves deep into the unexpected intersection of YouTube popularity and automotive safety, particularly focusing on the correlation between average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for issues with the seats. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, our research team aimed to shed light on this phenomenon and revel in the seat-raining results.

Drawing from a mix of data sources, including YouTube analytics and U.S. Department of Transportation records, our study unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 and p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings uncovered a "seat-ing" relationship between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, prompting us to affirm that when it comes to safety concerns, the "view" on seats truly matters.

To complement our rigorous statistical analysis, our research team couldn't resist throwing in a relevant dad joke: Why did the car feel insecure? Because it had "auto"matic "recalls" about its seats!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The automotive industry has long been at the forefront of technological innovation and engineering excellence, striving to ensure the safety and comfort of drivers and passengers alike. However, amidst the roar of engines and the hum of electronic systems, the humble yet pivotal component of automotive seating has garnered attention in both unexpected and unprecedented ways.
As automotive manufacturers constantly seek to improve the ergonomics and safety features of their seat designs, the spotlight has also turned to the digital realm, specifically YouTube, as a potential barometer of public sentiment and interest in automotive-related content. In this context, our research seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos, known for their captivating visual narratives, and automotive recalls pertaining to seat-related issues.
The correlation between YouTube viewership and automotive safety recalls may seem like a puzzling pairing at first glance, akin to finding a screwdriver in a bag of mixed nuts – unexpected, yet intriguing. However, as we delve deeper into the realm of data analysis, the threads of connection between these seemingly disparate elements begin to unravel, much like a well-worn car seat cover.
It is well known that seat-related recalls can present significant safety concerns for vehicle occupants, and are often the subject of intense scrutiny and remedial action by manufacturers and regulatory bodies. Meanwhile, the rise of digital platforms such as YouTube has ushered in a new era of information dissemination and consumer engagement, potentially influencing public perceptions and preferences in the automotive domain.
Our study embarks on a quest to uncover the pertinence of YouTube viewership, often an arena for feline antics and DIY enthusiasts, in relation to the safety and design of automotive seating. Perhaps it is time to integrate a new facet into the phrase "seat belt", reflecting not just physical fastening, but also the digital "views" that fasten public attention and interest.
Speaking of attention, here’s a dad joke that aligns with our research focus: Why did the minivan go to therapy? Because it had way too many "seating" issues!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a significant correlation between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues. The correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 indicates a strong positive relationship between these variables, demonstrating that as the average views of Deep Look videos increase, automotive recalls for seat-related issues also tend to increase. This unexpected connection provides insight into the potential influence of digital content on public awareness and automotive safety measures.
The r-squared value of 0.7142772 further supports the strength of the relationship between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues. This indicates that approximately 71.43% of the variability in automotive recalls for seat-related issues can be explained by the average views of Deep Look videos. In other words, the popularity of Deep Look videos on YouTube appears to be a substantial factor in predicting the occurrence of automotive recalls related to seat issues.
As for the p-value, which is less than 0.01, it indicates that the observed correlation between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues is statistically significant. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship by random chance is extremely low, providing strong evidence to support the validity of the correlation.
In essence, our research findings highlight the intriguing association between digital content consumption and automotive safety concerns, emphasizing the need for further exploration and consideration of non-traditional influencers in the automotive industry.
And speaking of influencers, here's a dad joke that fits right into our findings: Why did the seat go to therapy? Because it had too many "re-calls" to mind!
The accompanying scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, further substantiating our research findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research reveals a noteworthy correlation between the average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues. The striking correlation coefficient and p-value less than 0.01 underscore the robustness and statistical significance of this unexpected relationship. It seems that when it comes to automotive safety, the "view" on seats truly matters, much like a rearview mirror in the hands of a comedian – providing both insight and amusement.

Our findings not only add a unique dimension to the discourse on automotive safety but also beckon for further exploration of the interplay between digital content consumption and consumer awareness of automotive-related concerns. As we ponder the implications of our research, it becomes clear that the "seat-ing" relationship we've uncovered prompts contemplation on the potential influence of online media on public perceptions of automotive safety.

With such compelling evidence before us, it's hard to resist one last dad joke: Why was the car's seat feeling philosophical? Because it grappled with the weighty question of "what is the 'seat' of all these recalls?"

All in all, our research paves the way for a new understanding of the unexpected connections within the automotive industry and digital media landscape. As for future research, we confidently assert that, in the realm of YouTube views and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, no further research is needed.

So, here’s to steering clear of unnecessary research – on to the next statistical adventure!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Views on Seats: The YouTube Connection Between Average Views of Deep Look Videos and Automotive Recalls for Seat Issues. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Pop Culture and Product Safety


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Views on Seats: The YouTube Connection Between Average Views of Deep Look Videos and Automotive Recalls for Seat Issues. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Automotive Seating Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Views on Seats: The YouTube Connection Between Average Views of Deep Look Videos and Automotive Recalls for Seat Issues with an abstract of This research delves deep into the unexpected intersection of YouTube popularity and automotive safety, particularly focusing on the correlation between average views of Deep Look YouTube videos and automotive recalls for issues with the seats. Through meticulous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, our research team aimed to shed light on this phenomenon and revel in the seat-raining results.
Drawing from a mix of data sources, including YouTube analytics and U.S. Department of Transportation records, our study unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8451492 and p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings uncovered a "seat-ing" relationship between the average views of Deep Look videos and automotive recalls for seat-related issues, prompting us to affirm that when it comes to safety concerns, the "view" on seats truly matters.
To complement our rigorous statistical analysis, our research team couldn't resist throwing in a relevant dad joke: Why did the car feel insecure? Because it had "auto"matic "recalls" about its seats!

ChatGPT:

automotive seat recalls, YouTube popularity, Deep Look videos, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, automotive safety, seat-related issues, YouTube analytics, U.S. Department of Transportation records, car recalls, average views, safety concerns

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos

Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats

Correlation r = 0.8451492 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7142772 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos) over the 9 years from 2014 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0041. 0.0041207249743526065000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.41% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 243 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.41, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201420152016201720182019202020212022
Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos (Average views)8301471358560416992028679803442870545864014994301172590801075
Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats (Recalls)182044244040131626




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([830147,1358560,4169920,2867980,3442870,5458640,1499430,1172590,801075,])
array_2 = np.array([18,20,44,24,40,40,13,16,26,])
array_1_name = "Average views of Deep Look YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Seats"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 4535 · Black Variable ID: 25927 · Red Variable ID: 1109
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0