about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,438 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America.  The chart goes from 1986 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina increased, Hyundai executives became more preoccupied with the concept of total freedom, leading to a laissez-faire attitude in their vehicle production. This lack of regulation and oversight ironically resulted in an uptick of automotive recalls as their cars embodied the spirit of "you're on your own" on the roads. Remember, with great liberty comes great responsibility, especially when it comes to car safety!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s that depicts the following scene: In North Carolina, a ballot box labeled "Libertarian Votes for Senators" is overflowing with ballots, indicating a surge in support. In the background, a Hyundai Motor America factory is seen manufacturing cars with a "Total Freedom" banner hanging above the production line. However, a line of the cars is being recalled, illustrating a clear juxtaposition of the consequences of the laissez-faire approach. Create a simple visual representation that highlights this scene's contrasting elements while maintaining a sense of dynamism and retro aesthetics. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style a funny image you would see on reddit A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Magic realism Art nouveau
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America, in the following situation: As Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina increased, Hyundai executives became more preoccupied with the concept of total freedom, leading to a laissez-faire attitude in their vehicle production. This lack of regulation and oversight ironically resulted in an uptick of automotive recalls as their cars embodied the spirit of "you're on your own" on the roads. Remember, with great liberty comes great responsibility, especially when it comes to car safety!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In North Carolina, a ballot box with "Libertarian Votes for Senators" written on it is overflowing with ballots, indicating a surge in support. Meanwhile, at a Hyundai Motor America factory, cars are being manufactured with a "Total Freedom" banner hanging above the production line. However, amidst the lack of oversight, a line of cars is being recalled, showing a clear juxtaposition of the consequences of the laissez-faire approach.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In North Carolina, a ballot box with "Libertarian Votes for Senators" written on it is overflowing with ballots, indicating a surge in support. Meanwhile, at a Hyundai Motor America factory, cars are being manufactured with a "Total Freedom" banner hanging above the production line. However, amidst the lack of oversight, a line of cars is being recalled, showing a clear juxtaposition of the consequences of the laissez-faire approach. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s that depicts the following scene: In North Carolina, a ballot box labeled "Libertarian Votes for Senators" is overflowing with ballots, indicating a surge in support. In the background, a Hyundai Motor America factory is seen manufacturing cars with a "Total Freedom" banner hanging above the production line. However, a line of the cars is being recalled, illustrating a clear juxtaposition of the consequences of the laissez-faire approach. Create a simple visual representation that highlights this scene's contrasting elements while maintaining a sense of dynamism and retro aesthetics.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina caused Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Revving Up the Vote: A Revolting Connection Between Libertarian Votes and Hyundai Recalls in North Carolina

Journal of Quirky Connections

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 and p < 0.01 for 1986 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Revving Up the Vote: A Revolting Connection Between Libertarian Votes and Hyundai Recalls in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and the issuance of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. Despite the ostensibly unrelated domains of political voting and automotive manufacturing, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 1986 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 and p < 0.01 uncovers an unlikely connection between these seemingly incongruent variables. This study provides a new lens through which to view the intersections of political preferences and corporate performance, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional wisdom. While the association invites skepticism, it also beckons further investigation into the uncharted territory where automotive engineering meets political ideology. So, buckle up as we navigate the winding road of statistical analysis to unveil this unexpected correlation, and strive to drive home the significance of these findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Revving Up the Vote: A Revolting Connection Between Libertarian Votes and Hyundai Recalls in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and the issuance of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. Despite the ostensibly unrelated domains of political voting and automotive manufacturing, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 1986 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 and p < 0.01 uncovers an unlikely connection between these seemingly incongruent variables. This study provides a new lens through which to view the intersections of political preferences and corporate performance, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional wisdom. While the association invites skepticism, it also beckons further investigation into the uncharted territory where automotive engineering meets political ideology. So, buckle up as we navigate the winding road of statistical analysis to unveil this unexpected correlation, and strive to drive home the significance of these findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

What do automotive recalls and political voting have in common? At first glance, not much. However, as the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's a recall," or something like that. In the automotive realm, recalls can spark controversy, frustration, and in some cases, even heartbreak. Meanwhile, in the political arena, votes cast can set the wheels of change in motion, or simply steer the status quo along. While both activities seem worlds apart, our research endeavors to establish a connection between them that may leave you feeling like you've been taken for a circuitous spin.

The state of North Carolina stands as our testing ground, where the sound of Libertarian votes echoes through the halls of democracy, and the hum of Hyundai engines fills the air. Coincidence or correlation? That is the question we pose as we shift into high gear and venture into this unexplored territory where the rubber of political ideology meets the road of automotive manufacturing. Our study aims to traverse this uncharted intersection, examining the perplexing relationship between voter behavior and automotive product safety.

Come along for the ride as we uncover the unexpected twists and turns that connect the political preferences of North Carolinians with the vehicular woes experienced by Hyundai Motor America. Let's put the pedal to the political metal and delve into the empirical evidence, examining the unlikely correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in the Tar Heel State and the recalls issued by Hyundai. Fasten your seatbelts, because you never know what curves may come our way in this journey through statistical analyses and scholarly scrutiny. With this in mind, let's rev up our engines and delve into this revoltingly riveting correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Revving Up the Vote: A Revolting Connection Between Libertarian Votes and Hyundai Recalls in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and the issuance of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. Despite the ostensibly unrelated domains of political voting and automotive manufacturing, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 1986 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 and p < 0.01 uncovers an unlikely connection between these seemingly incongruent variables. This study provides a new lens through which to view the intersections of political preferences and corporate performance, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional wisdom. While the association invites skepticism, it also beckons further investigation into the uncharted territory where automotive engineering meets political ideology. So, buckle up as we navigate the winding road of statistical analysis to unveil this unexpected correlation, and strive to drive home the significance of these findings.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
What do automotive recalls and political voting have in common? At first glance, not much. However, as the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's a recall," or something like that. In the automotive realm, recalls can spark controversy, frustration, and in some cases, even heartbreak. Meanwhile, in the political arena, votes cast can set the wheels of change in motion, or simply steer the status quo along. While both activities seem worlds apart, our research endeavors to establish a connection between them that may leave you feeling like you've been taken for a circuitous spin.
The state of North Carolina stands as our testing ground, where the sound of Libertarian votes echoes through the halls of democracy, and the hum of Hyundai engines fills the air. Coincidence or correlation? That is the question we pose as we shift into high gear and venture into this unexplored territory where the rubber of political ideology meets the road of automotive manufacturing. Our study aims to traverse this uncharted intersection, examining the perplexing relationship between voter behavior and automotive product safety.
Come along for the ride as we uncover the unexpected twists and turns that connect the political preferences of North Carolinians with the vehicular woes experienced by Hyundai Motor America. Let's put the pedal to the political metal and delve into the empirical evidence, examining the unlikely correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in the Tar Heel State and the recalls issued by Hyundai. Fasten your seatbelts, because you never know what curves may come our way in this journey through statistical analyses and scholarly scrutiny. With this in mind, let's rev up our engines and delve into this revoltingly riveting correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) scrutinized the political landscape of North Carolina, examining the influence of third-party voting in senatorial elections. Their analysis shed light on the voting patterns of Libertarian-leaning constituents and the impact of their votes on the state's political trajectory. Building upon this foundation, Jones (2017) delved into the world of automotive recalls, highlighting the complexities of product safety and consumer trust within the automotive industry.

Expanding our view beyond the academic realm, "The Road Less Traveled" by M. Scott Peck and "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us" by Daniel H. Pink offer compelling insights into personal choices and motivations, which may resonate with the unpredictability of political preferences and corporate decisions. On the fictional side, the narratives in "Racing in the Rain: My Life As a Dog" by Garth Stein and "The Art of Racing in the Rain" by Amanda Lee provide intriguing parallels to the fickle nature of public opinion and the unforeseen challenges faced by automotive manufacturers.

In the pursuit of understanding the unexpected union of Libertarian votes and automotive recalls, the research team took an unconventional approach to supplement academic literature with cultural references. Shows such as "Top Gear" and "The Grand Tour" presented a blend of automotive fascination and entertainment, offering a glimpse into the intricacies of vehicle design and performance. These cultural forays into the automotive world provided an enriching backdrop to our inquiry, igniting new perspectives on the intertwined dynamics of motor vehicles and public discourse.

As our journey through the literature unfolds, it becomes apparent that the intersection of political ideologies and automotive product safety is a terrain rife with surprises and, dare we say, potholes. The eclectic mix of academic analyses, non-fictional musings, and cultural explorations sets the stage for unraveling the enigmatic correlation between Libertarian votes and Hyundai recalls in the context of North Carolina. With this diverse array of sources as our compass, we venture forth to decode the intricacies of this revoltingly riveting correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1986 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Revving Up the Vote: A Revolting Connection Between Libertarian Votes and Hyundai Recalls in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and the issuance of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. Despite the ostensibly unrelated domains of political voting and automotive manufacturing, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 1986 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 and p < 0.01 uncovers an unlikely connection between these seemingly incongruent variables. This study provides a new lens through which to view the intersections of political preferences and corporate performance, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional wisdom. While the association invites skepticism, it also beckons further investigation into the uncharted territory where automotive engineering meets political ideology. So, buckle up as we navigate the winding road of statistical analysis to unveil this unexpected correlation, and strive to drive home the significance of these findings.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
What do automotive recalls and political voting have in common? At first glance, not much. However, as the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's a recall," or something like that. In the automotive realm, recalls can spark controversy, frustration, and in some cases, even heartbreak. Meanwhile, in the political arena, votes cast can set the wheels of change in motion, or simply steer the status quo along. While both activities seem worlds apart, our research endeavors to establish a connection between them that may leave you feeling like you've been taken for a circuitous spin.
The state of North Carolina stands as our testing ground, where the sound of Libertarian votes echoes through the halls of democracy, and the hum of Hyundai engines fills the air. Coincidence or correlation? That is the question we pose as we shift into high gear and venture into this unexplored territory where the rubber of political ideology meets the road of automotive manufacturing. Our study aims to traverse this uncharted intersection, examining the perplexing relationship between voter behavior and automotive product safety.
Come along for the ride as we uncover the unexpected twists and turns that connect the political preferences of North Carolinians with the vehicular woes experienced by Hyundai Motor America. Let's put the pedal to the political metal and delve into the empirical evidence, examining the unlikely correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in the Tar Heel State and the recalls issued by Hyundai. Fasten your seatbelts, because you never know what curves may come our way in this journey through statistical analyses and scholarly scrutiny. With this in mind, let's rev up our engines and delve into this revoltingly riveting correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the enthralling relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and the issuance of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America, we embarked on a methodological odyssey that could rival the twists and turns of a political campaign trail. Our journey began with the collection of data from a variety of sources, primarily the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation. These repositories served as our data fuel stations, providing us with a comprehensive range of information spanning the years 1986 to 2020, allowing us to scrutinize the electoral and automotive landscapes with meticulous attention to detail.

Our analysis revved into motion as we meticulously compiled and cross-referenced the electoral outcomes in North Carolina with the occurrence of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. This process involved navigating the digital highways and byways, where each dataset served as a mile marker on our scholarly road trip. We scrutinized the voting behaviors of self-identified Libertarians, who, much like elusive mechanical gremlins, are often underrepresented in conventional political analyses, adding an element of surprise to our expedition.

Employing advanced statistical methods, including regression analysis and hypothesis testing, we sought to ascertain the strength and significance of any correlation between the aforementioned variables. Our mathematical magnifying glass revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9455371, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a connection that cannot be dismissed as mere statistical noise. This unexpected finding beckoned further scrutiny, prompting us to delve deeper into the complexities of North Carolina's political landscape and Hyundai's automotive saga.

Our efforts were akin to conducting an automotive safety check on political beliefs, akin to scrutinizing a car's airbags and seatbelts for potential hazards. As such, our study represents a unique venture into uncharted territory, a journey that endeavors to shine a light on the enigmatic nexus between ideological preferences and automotive engineering. We invite readers to join us in this scholarly expedition, holding onto their hats and seatbelts as we navigate the data-rich terrain, uncovering the correlation that binds Libertarian votes and automotive recalls in North Carolina. So, fasten your intellectual seatbelt and let's rev up for an enlightening excursion into the puzzling, yet oddly compelling, correlation between political ideology and automotive safety.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .

For the time period 1986 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9455371, r-squared of 0.8940404, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Revving Up the Vote: A Revolting Connection Between Libertarian Votes and Hyundai Recalls in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and the issuance of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. Despite the ostensibly unrelated domains of political voting and automotive manufacturing, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 1986 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 and p < 0.01 uncovers an unlikely connection between these seemingly incongruent variables. This study provides a new lens through which to view the intersections of political preferences and corporate performance, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional wisdom. While the association invites skepticism, it also beckons further investigation into the uncharted territory where automotive engineering meets political ideology. So, buckle up as we navigate the winding road of statistical analysis to unveil this unexpected correlation, and strive to drive home the significance of these findings.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
What do automotive recalls and political voting have in common? At first glance, not much. However, as the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's a recall," or something like that. In the automotive realm, recalls can spark controversy, frustration, and in some cases, even heartbreak. Meanwhile, in the political arena, votes cast can set the wheels of change in motion, or simply steer the status quo along. While both activities seem worlds apart, our research endeavors to establish a connection between them that may leave you feeling like you've been taken for a circuitous spin.
The state of North Carolina stands as our testing ground, where the sound of Libertarian votes echoes through the halls of democracy, and the hum of Hyundai engines fills the air. Coincidence or correlation? That is the question we pose as we shift into high gear and venture into this unexplored territory where the rubber of political ideology meets the road of automotive manufacturing. Our study aims to traverse this uncharted intersection, examining the perplexing relationship between voter behavior and automotive product safety.
Come along for the ride as we uncover the unexpected twists and turns that connect the political preferences of North Carolinians with the vehicular woes experienced by Hyundai Motor America. Let's put the pedal to the political metal and delve into the empirical evidence, examining the unlikely correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in the Tar Heel State and the recalls issued by Hyundai. Fasten your seatbelts, because you never know what curves may come our way in this journey through statistical analyses and scholarly scrutiny. With this in mind, let's rev up our engines and delve into this revoltingly riveting correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America over the period of 1986 to 2020 yielded some intriguing results, to say the least. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 discovered in our study suggests a remarkably close association between the two seemingly distinct variables. In simpler terms, it's as if the political landscape and the automotive industry decided to carpool, much to the surprise of both proponents and skeptics.

To put it into perspective, if political preferences were a GPS, then automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America have taken a detour or two along the Libertarian vote expressway. Our findings also revealed an r-squared value of 0.8940404, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variance in automotive recalls could be explained by Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina. Cue the chorus of "sweet home correlation" as we navigate this unfamiliar territory where ideology and industry converge.

Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 reinforces the statistical significance of this surprising association. It's the kind of statistical significance that makes you want to polish up your old bumper stickers from the 80s and proudly display them in the name of correlation. Whether this correlation is as sound as a well-tuned engine or as elusive as the perfect parking spot on a busy city street, these results demand further scrutiny and exploration.

In Fig. 1, our scatterplot visually encapsulates the strong correlation between Libertarian votes and Hyundai recall trends in North Carolina, making it abundantly clear that there is more than meets the eye when it comes to understanding the interplay between political ideology and automotive performance. It's the kind of graphic representation that puts the "car" in correlation, if you catch our drift.

In conclusion, our findings bring understanding to a strange bedfellow pairing of political choices and automotive mishaps, shedding light on a correlation that could very well redefine the intersections of politics and engineering, and perhaps even inspire a new brand of hybrid vehicles - the "Libertarian Reclall" edition. This research paves the way for further exploration at the intersection of these uncharted territories, igniting curiosity about the unexpected intersections of voter behavior and automotive product safety.

Stay tuned as we navigate the unexplored off-roads of automotive recalls and political voting, revving up to unravel more mysteries and, hopefully, steering clear of any statistical potholes along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Revving Up the Vote: A Revolting Connection Between Libertarian Votes and Hyundai Recalls in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and the issuance of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. Despite the ostensibly unrelated domains of political voting and automotive manufacturing, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 1986 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 and p < 0.01 uncovers an unlikely connection between these seemingly incongruent variables. This study provides a new lens through which to view the intersections of political preferences and corporate performance, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional wisdom. While the association invites skepticism, it also beckons further investigation into the uncharted territory where automotive engineering meets political ideology. So, buckle up as we navigate the winding road of statistical analysis to unveil this unexpected correlation, and strive to drive home the significance of these findings.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) scrutinized the political landscape of North Carolina, examining the influence of third-party voting in senatorial elections. Their analysis shed light on the voting patterns of Libertarian-leaning constituents and the impact of their votes on the state's political trajectory. Building upon this foundation, Jones (2017) delved into the world of automotive recalls, highlighting the complexities of product safety and consumer trust within the automotive industry.
Expanding our view beyond the academic realm, "The Road Less Traveled" by M. Scott Peck and "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us" by Daniel H. Pink offer compelling insights into personal choices and motivations, which may resonate with the unpredictability of political preferences and corporate decisions. On the fictional side, the narratives in "Racing in the Rain: My Life As a Dog" by Garth Stein and "The Art of Racing in the Rain" by Amanda Lee provide intriguing parallels to the fickle nature of public opinion and the unforeseen challenges faced by automotive manufacturers.
In the pursuit of understanding the unexpected union of Libertarian votes and automotive recalls, the research team took an unconventional approach to supplement academic literature with cultural references. Shows such as "Top Gear" and "The Grand Tour" presented a blend of automotive fascination and entertainment, offering a glimpse into the intricacies of vehicle design and performance. These cultural forays into the automotive world provided an enriching backdrop to our inquiry, igniting new perspectives on the intertwined dynamics of motor vehicles and public discourse.
As our journey through the literature unfolds, it becomes apparent that the intersection of political ideologies and automotive product safety is a terrain rife with surprises and, dare we say, potholes. The eclectic mix of academic analyses, non-fictional musings, and cultural explorations sets the stage for unraveling the enigmatic correlation between Libertarian votes and Hyundai recalls in the context of North Carolina. With this diverse array of sources as our compass, we venture forth to decode the intricacies of this revoltingly riveting correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America over the period of 1986 to 2020 yielded some intriguing results, to say the least. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 discovered in our study suggests a remarkably close association between the two seemingly distinct variables. In simpler terms, it's as if the political landscape and the automotive industry decided to carpool, much to the surprise of both proponents and skeptics.
To put it into perspective, if political preferences were a GPS, then automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America have taken a detour or two along the Libertarian vote expressway. Our findings also revealed an r-squared value of 0.8940404, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variance in automotive recalls could be explained by Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina. Cue the chorus of "sweet home correlation" as we navigate this unfamiliar territory where ideology and industry converge.
Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 reinforces the statistical significance of this surprising association. It's the kind of statistical significance that makes you want to polish up your old bumper stickers from the 80s and proudly display them in the name of correlation. Whether this correlation is as sound as a well-tuned engine or as elusive as the perfect parking spot on a busy city street, these results demand further scrutiny and exploration.
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot visually encapsulates the strong correlation between Libertarian votes and Hyundai recall trends in North Carolina, making it abundantly clear that there is more than meets the eye when it comes to understanding the interplay between political ideology and automotive performance. It's the kind of graphic representation that puts the "car" in correlation, if you catch our drift.
In conclusion, our findings bring understanding to a strange bedfellow pairing of political choices and automotive mishaps, shedding light on a correlation that could very well redefine the intersections of politics and engineering, and perhaps even inspire a new brand of hybrid vehicles - the "Libertarian Reclall" edition. This research paves the way for further exploration at the intersection of these uncharted territories, igniting curiosity about the unexpected intersections of voter behavior and automotive product safety.
Stay tuned as we navigate the unexplored off-roads of automotive recalls and political voting, revving up to unravel more mysteries and, hopefully, steering clear of any statistical potholes along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study have brought to light an unexpectedly tight association between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and the issuance of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. Our findings echo the sentiment of Smith and Doe (2015) who first emphasized the significance of third-party voting in North Carolina's senatorial elections. By unveiling a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9455371, our study not only supports their observations but also integrates them into an unanticipated connection with automotive industry dynamics. It seems one cannot simply hit the brakes on the influence of third-party votes in shaping the political and automotive landscape.

In parallel, the findings corroborate the depth of Jones' (2017) insights into the complexities of product safety and consumer trust within the automotive industry, albeit with an unconventional twist. This unexpected link between political ideology and automotive performance brings to mind the unpredictable narrative of "Racing in the Rain: My Life As a Dog" by Garth Stein, subtly reflecting the unforeseen challenges faced by automotive manufacturers. Indeed, much like the unpredictability of a racetrack, the ramifications of political choices on automotive recalls proved to be surprising and, dare we say, revoltingly riveting.

The extensive explorations of the eclectic mix of academic analyses, non-fictional musings, and cultural references in our study have uncovered a correlation that—despite its unexpected nature—beckons further scrutiny. It appears that the political ideologies in North Carolina have taken an unforeseen scenic route, coinciding with the course of automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America, much like a chart-topping song on the radio wave of correlation. The resonance between Libertarian votes and Hyundai recall trends indicates a substantial convergence of discrete domains, akin to the harmonious hum of a well-tuned engine on the political highway.

Furthermore, the statistical p-value of less than 0.01 serves as a resounding testament to the unwavering significance of this unexpected association, affording it the kind of statistical weight that might lead one to ponder if they should "recall" their previous assumptions. Therefore, it is clear that our findings stand to reignite the pioneering spirit of exploration at the crossroads of voter behavior and automotive product safety.

As we navigate the unexplored off-roads of automotive recalls and political voting, our study not only revs up further inquiries but also shines a spotlight on the previously unforeseen intersections of political choices and automotive mishaps. It is undeniable that these results have laid a new foundation for future scholarly investigations, inviting scholars to embrace the unexpected and steer clear of any predisposed statistical potholes along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Revving Up the Vote: A Revolting Connection Between Libertarian Votes and Hyundai Recalls in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and the issuance of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. Despite the ostensibly unrelated domains of political voting and automotive manufacturing, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 1986 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 and p < 0.01 uncovers an unlikely connection between these seemingly incongruent variables. This study provides a new lens through which to view the intersections of political preferences and corporate performance, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional wisdom. While the association invites skepticism, it also beckons further investigation into the uncharted territory where automotive engineering meets political ideology. So, buckle up as we navigate the winding road of statistical analysis to unveil this unexpected correlation, and strive to drive home the significance of these findings.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
What do automotive recalls and political voting have in common? At first glance, not much. However, as the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's a recall," or something like that. In the automotive realm, recalls can spark controversy, frustration, and in some cases, even heartbreak. Meanwhile, in the political arena, votes cast can set the wheels of change in motion, or simply steer the status quo along. While both activities seem worlds apart, our research endeavors to establish a connection between them that may leave you feeling like you've been taken for a circuitous spin.
The state of North Carolina stands as our testing ground, where the sound of Libertarian votes echoes through the halls of democracy, and the hum of Hyundai engines fills the air. Coincidence or correlation? That is the question we pose as we shift into high gear and venture into this unexplored territory where the rubber of political ideology meets the road of automotive manufacturing. Our study aims to traverse this uncharted intersection, examining the perplexing relationship between voter behavior and automotive product safety.
Come along for the ride as we uncover the unexpected twists and turns that connect the political preferences of North Carolinians with the vehicular woes experienced by Hyundai Motor America. Let's put the pedal to the political metal and delve into the empirical evidence, examining the unlikely correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in the Tar Heel State and the recalls issued by Hyundai. Fasten your seatbelts, because you never know what curves may come our way in this journey through statistical analyses and scholarly scrutiny. With this in mind, let's rev up our engines and delve into this revoltingly riveting correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America over the period of 1986 to 2020 yielded some intriguing results, to say the least. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 discovered in our study suggests a remarkably close association between the two seemingly distinct variables. In simpler terms, it's as if the political landscape and the automotive industry decided to carpool, much to the surprise of both proponents and skeptics.
To put it into perspective, if political preferences were a GPS, then automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America have taken a detour or two along the Libertarian vote expressway. Our findings also revealed an r-squared value of 0.8940404, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variance in automotive recalls could be explained by Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina. Cue the chorus of "sweet home correlation" as we navigate this unfamiliar territory where ideology and industry converge.
Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 reinforces the statistical significance of this surprising association. It's the kind of statistical significance that makes you want to polish up your old bumper stickers from the 80s and proudly display them in the name of correlation. Whether this correlation is as sound as a well-tuned engine or as elusive as the perfect parking spot on a busy city street, these results demand further scrutiny and exploration.
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot visually encapsulates the strong correlation between Libertarian votes and Hyundai recall trends in North Carolina, making it abundantly clear that there is more than meets the eye when it comes to understanding the interplay between political ideology and automotive performance. It's the kind of graphic representation that puts the "car" in correlation, if you catch our drift.
In conclusion, our findings bring understanding to a strange bedfellow pairing of political choices and automotive mishaps, shedding light on a correlation that could very well redefine the intersections of politics and engineering, and perhaps even inspire a new brand of hybrid vehicles - the "Libertarian Reclall" edition. This research paves the way for further exploration at the intersection of these uncharted territories, igniting curiosity about the unexpected intersections of voter behavior and automotive product safety.
Stay tuned as we navigate the unexplored off-roads of automotive recalls and political voting, revving up to unravel more mysteries and, hopefully, steering clear of any statistical potholes along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study have unveiled a surprising and oddly captivating association between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America. It seems that when it comes to political preferences and automotive hiccups, there's more than transmission issues at play. The exceptionally close correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 defies the standard logic, prompting us to reconsider the proverbial "road less traveled" and its potential impact on automotive manufacturing and political preferences.

While the statistical significance of this correlation may elicit some eyebrow raises, it would be remiss not to acknowledge the humorously unexpected nature of these findings. One might say that it's like stumbling upon a political bumper sticker in the upholstery of a Hyundai being serviced for a recall—a strange, but undeniably eye-catching discovery.

The r-squared value of 0.8940404 further emphasizes the magnitude of this correlation, painting a picture of an intricate dance between political leanings and automotive engineering. This correlation may even inspire new slogans for political campaigns, such as "Vote Libertarian: Driving Change, One Recall at a Time!"

As for the p-value being less than 0.01, one could almost hear the collective chuckle of statisticians marveling at this unexpected phenomenon. It's as if statistical significance has taken a detour through uncharted territory, surprising even the most astute observers.

Given these findings, it is with a mix of bemusement and scholarly intrigue that we assert no further research is needed in this area. This study has more than revved up the academic engines, offering a captivating glimpse into the intersections of political ideology and automotive regulation. While the road ahead may be uncertain, one thing is clear: the connection between Libertarian votes and Hyundai recalls in North Carolina is a correlation worthy of note—a pun definitely intended.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Revving Up the Vote: A Revolting Connection Between Libertarian Votes and Hyundai Recalls in North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Revving Up the Vote: A Revolting Connection Between Libertarian Votes and Hyundai Recalls in North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Committee for Wacky Economic and Automotive Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Revving Up the Vote: A Revolting Connection Between Libertarian Votes and Hyundai Recalls in North Carolina with an abstract of This research paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina and the issuance of automotive recalls by Hyundai Motor America. Despite the ostensibly unrelated domains of political voting and automotive manufacturing, our findings reveal a surprising correlation that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 1986 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455371 and p < 0.01 uncovers an unlikely connection between these seemingly incongruent variables. This study provides a new lens through which to view the intersections of political preferences and corporate performance, offering a fresh perspective that challenges conventional wisdom. While the association invites skepticism, it also beckons further investigation into the uncharted territory where automotive engineering meets political ideology. So, buckle up as we navigate the winding road of statistical analysis to unveil this unexpected correlation, and strive to drive home the significance of these findings.

ChatGPT:

"Libertarian votes North Carolina," "Hyundai recalls North Carolina," "political voting and automotive recalls correlation," "Libertarian voting behavior," "automotive manufacturing and political preferences," "correlation between political ideology and corporate performance," "MIT Election Data and Science Lab," "Harvard Dataverse," "US Department of Transportation data analysis," "statistical analysis of seemingly incongruent variables," "intersections of political preferences and corporate performance," "automotive engineering and political ideology correlation."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in North Carolina
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina

Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Hyundai Motor America
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America

Correlation r = 0.9455371 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8940404 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina) over the 9 years from 1986 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00012. 0.0001176702215401746600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 8,498 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199619982002200420082010201420162020
Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina (Total votes)2539636963338074774313343055687109100167592171571
Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America (Recalls)116394101715




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([25396,36963,33807,47743,133430,55687,109100,167592,171571,])
array_2 = np.array([1,1,6,3,9,4,10,17,15,])
array_1_name = "Libertarian votes for Senators in North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Hyundai Motor America"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 4438 · Black Variable ID: 26291 · Red Variable ID: 1127
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0