about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,332 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and the second variable is Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The electromagnetic waves emitted by the iPhones inadvertently triggered a subliminal urge to engage with science content, leading to more likes on AsapSCIENCE videos. It's a shocking discovery!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image inspired by Bauhaus, depicting a bustling city where people excitedly unbox and activate their new iPhones. Meanwhile, in a cozy living room, friends gather around a laptop, watching an AsapSCIENCE video. As the iPhone users engage with their new devices, a subtle shift occurs in the room, and the viewers' faces light up with intrigue and enthusiasm, resulting in a surge of likes on the AsapSCIENCE video. The electromagnetic waves and the engaging science content merge, creating an unexpected and captivating visual connection. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami Brutalism Magic realism Scalar art inspired by bauhaus
ChatGPT: inspired by bauhaus

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos, in the following situation: The electromagnetic waves emitted by the iPhones inadvertently triggered a subliminal urge to engage with science content, leading to more likes on AsapSCIENCE videos. It's a shocking discovery!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city, people are seen eagerly unboxing and activating their new iPhones, creating a wave of excitement and anticipation. Simultaneously, in a cozy living room, a group of friends gather around a laptop, watching an AsapSCIENCE video. As the iPhone users interact with their new devices, a subtle, yet noticeable shift in the room occurs, and the viewers' faces light up with intrigue and enthusiasm, resulting in a surge of likes on the AsapSCIENCE video. The electromagnetic waves and the engaging science content merge, creating a surprising and captivating connection.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ inspired by bauhaus ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city, people are seen eagerly unboxing and activating their new iPhones, creating a wave of excitement and anticipation. Simultaneously, in a cozy living room, a group of friends gather around a laptop, watching an AsapSCIENCE video. As the iPhone users interact with their new devices, a subtle, yet noticeable shift in the room occurs, and the viewers' faces light up with intrigue and enthusiasm, resulting in a surge of likes on the AsapSCIENCE video. The electromagnetic waves and the engaging science content merge, creating a surprising and captivating connection. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image inspired by Bauhaus, depicting a bustling city where people excitedly unbox and activate their new iPhones. Meanwhile, in a cozy living room, friends gather around a laptop, watching an AsapSCIENCE video. As the iPhone users engage with their new devices, a subtle shift occurs in the room, and the viewers' faces light up with intrigue and enthusiasm, resulting in a surge of likes on the AsapSCIENCE video. The electromagnetic waves and the engaging science content merge, creating an unexpected and captivating visual connection.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 caused Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
iCan't Believe It's Apples and Likes: Exploring the Surprising Connection Between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos

The Journal of Digital Fruit Consumption Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Statista and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8932686 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"iCan't Believe It's Apples and Likes: Exploring the Surprising Connection Between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the oh-so-serious world of data analysis to explore the unexpected relationship between two seemingly disparate entities: Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. Using robust data sourced from Statista and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine the correlation between these two phenomena. Upon conducting our analysis for the years 2012 to 2018, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8932686 and a p-value less than 0.01, shedding light on this quirky association. Our findings not only provoke contemplation on the intricacies of consumer behavior but also serve as a testament to the joyous, enigmatic dance of numbers in the modern digital era. As we navigate these uncharted waters of statistical whimsy, one can't help but ponder: could it be that the key to understanding consumer preferences lies in the seemingly whimsical realm of YouTube likes and global gadget sales?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"iCan't Believe It's Apples and Likes: Exploring the Surprising Connection Between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the oh-so-serious world of data analysis to explore the unexpected relationship between two seemingly disparate entities: Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. Using robust data sourced from Statista and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine the correlation between these two phenomena. Upon conducting our analysis for the years 2012 to 2018, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8932686 and a p-value less than 0.01, shedding light on this quirky association. Our findings not only provoke contemplation on the intricacies of consumer behavior but also serve as a testament to the joyous, enigmatic dance of numbers in the modern digital era. As we navigate these uncharted waters of statistical whimsy, one can't help but ponder: could it be that the key to understanding consumer preferences lies in the seemingly whimsical realm of YouTube likes and global gadget sales?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of consumer behavior and digital media is an ever-evolving landscape, rife with perplexing correlations and unexpected connections. In this study, we embark on a journey to uncover the peculiar and enigmatic relationship between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. What may seem like an odd pairing at first glance unveils a fascinating intersection between consumer technology preferences and online engagement with science content. While one may initially assume these two entities to be as different as apples and oranges, our rigorous data analysis reveals a compelling and statistically sound association that demands further exploration.

The ubiquitous presence of Apple's iPhone in the global consumer market is undeniable, with its quarterly sales figures serving as a barometer for technological trends and consumer preferences. Conversely, AsapSCIENCE, known for its succinct yet engaging science explainer videos, has amassed a substantial following on YouTube, with viewers expressing their appreciation through the deceptively simple click of the "like" button. These seemingly disparate domains converge in our analysis, prompting us to unravel the underlying factors that contribute to this unexpected correlation.

As we peer through the lens of quantitative analysis, it becomes apparent that the apparently whimsical world of YouTube likes holds surprising insights into consumer behavior. The modern era of digital engagement has bestowed upon us a treasure trove of data, serving as a canvas for statistical exploration. Our findings not only raise thought-provoking questions but also challenge traditional paradigms in understanding the interplay between consumer technology and digital engagement.

Through the lens of rigorous statistical methodologies, our investigation seeks to elevate the dialogue around the symbiotic relationship between online engagement and consumer choices. As we uncover the statistical whimsy that underpins this connection, we invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts alike to join us in pondering the unexpected and embracing the delightful dance of numbers in the digital age. Join us as we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, for it is in the unlikeliest of places that we often find the most delightful surprises.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"iCan't Believe It's Apples and Likes: Exploring the Surprising Connection Between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the oh-so-serious world of data analysis to explore the unexpected relationship between two seemingly disparate entities: Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. Using robust data sourced from Statista and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine the correlation between these two phenomena. Upon conducting our analysis for the years 2012 to 2018, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8932686 and a p-value less than 0.01, shedding light on this quirky association. Our findings not only provoke contemplation on the intricacies of consumer behavior but also serve as a testament to the joyous, enigmatic dance of numbers in the modern digital era. As we navigate these uncharted waters of statistical whimsy, one can't help but ponder: could it be that the key to understanding consumer preferences lies in the seemingly whimsical realm of YouTube likes and global gadget sales?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of consumer behavior and digital media is an ever-evolving landscape, rife with perplexing correlations and unexpected connections. In this study, we embark on a journey to uncover the peculiar and enigmatic relationship between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. What may seem like an odd pairing at first glance unveils a fascinating intersection between consumer technology preferences and online engagement with science content. While one may initially assume these two entities to be as different as apples and oranges, our rigorous data analysis reveals a compelling and statistically sound association that demands further exploration.
The ubiquitous presence of Apple's iPhone in the global consumer market is undeniable, with its quarterly sales figures serving as a barometer for technological trends and consumer preferences. Conversely, AsapSCIENCE, known for its succinct yet engaging science explainer videos, has amassed a substantial following on YouTube, with viewers expressing their appreciation through the deceptively simple click of the "like" button. These seemingly disparate domains converge in our analysis, prompting us to unravel the underlying factors that contribute to this unexpected correlation.
As we peer through the lens of quantitative analysis, it becomes apparent that the apparently whimsical world of YouTube likes holds surprising insights into consumer behavior. The modern era of digital engagement has bestowed upon us a treasure trove of data, serving as a canvas for statistical exploration. Our findings not only raise thought-provoking questions but also challenge traditional paradigms in understanding the interplay between consumer technology and digital engagement.
Through the lens of rigorous statistical methodologies, our investigation seeks to elevate the dialogue around the symbiotic relationship between online engagement and consumer choices. As we uncover the statistical whimsy that underpins this connection, we invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts alike to join us in pondering the unexpected and embracing the delightful dance of numbers in the digital age. Join us as we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, for it is in the unlikeliest of places that we often find the most delightful surprises.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The academic exploration of seemingly incongruent phenomena has long been a pursuit of scholars seeking to unravel the intricacies of human behavior and digital engagement, prompting them to venture into statistical whimsy that often sets the stage for unexpected surprises. With bated breath, the authors delve into existing literature to situate the enigmatic linkage between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos in the broader scholarly context.

Smith and Doe (2015) contribute to the canon with their seminal work on consumer technology preferences, providing a sturdy foundation for our investigation. Their rigorous analysis of gadget sales trends offers valuable insights into the world of smartphones, setting the stage for our foray into the surprising correlation before us. Jones (2018) further enriches the discourse by addressing the nuances of digital engagement and its implications on consumer choices, paving the way for our investigation into the whimsical realm of YouTube likes.

In "Data and Digits: Unraveling Modern Consumer Trends," the authors ascertain the significance of quantitative data in illuminating consumer behaviors, paving the way for our plunge into the seemingly capricious world of YouTube engagement and gadget preferences. "The Science of Consumer Whimsy" by Applebaum (2019) offers a refreshingly quirky take on consumer choices, underscoring the unassuming charm of statistical whimsy in modern digital landscapes.

Venturing beyond the conventional pillars of academic literature, we draw inspiration from the timeless wisdom of non-fiction classics such as "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, shedding light on the unanticipated twists and turns of human decision-making that resonate with the essence of our exploration. Similarly, "Nudge" by Thaler and Sunstein underscores the underlying nudges and influences that steer consumer behavior, offering a whimsical lens through which we contemplate the unexpected dance of numbers in the digital age.

In the spirit of lighthearted academic discourse, we draw parallels to fictional narratives that echo the undercurrents of our investigation. From "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams to "Ready Player One" by Ernest Cline, the unexpected juxtapositions and delightful surprises within these narratives mirror the whimsical nature of our statistical exploration.

More surprisingly, memes such as "This is fine" dog and "Surprised Pikachu" occupy a peculiar but pertinent space in our discussion, serving as visual metaphors for the unexpected revelations that await as we navigate through the labyrinth of statistical whimsy.

In the whimsical world of statistical analysis, the literature surrounding the intersection of seemingly unrelated entities sets the stage for a journey that promises a delightful blend of insight and amusement, challenging conventions and embracing the unexpected with open arms. With this rich tapestry of academic and cultural influences in mind, we embark on our statistical escapade, eager to unearth the marvels that lie at the intersection of Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"iCan't Believe It's Apples and Likes: Exploring the Surprising Connection Between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the oh-so-serious world of data analysis to explore the unexpected relationship between two seemingly disparate entities: Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. Using robust data sourced from Statista and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine the correlation between these two phenomena. Upon conducting our analysis for the years 2012 to 2018, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8932686 and a p-value less than 0.01, shedding light on this quirky association. Our findings not only provoke contemplation on the intricacies of consumer behavior but also serve as a testament to the joyous, enigmatic dance of numbers in the modern digital era. As we navigate these uncharted waters of statistical whimsy, one can't help but ponder: could it be that the key to understanding consumer preferences lies in the seemingly whimsical realm of YouTube likes and global gadget sales?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of consumer behavior and digital media is an ever-evolving landscape, rife with perplexing correlations and unexpected connections. In this study, we embark on a journey to uncover the peculiar and enigmatic relationship between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. What may seem like an odd pairing at first glance unveils a fascinating intersection between consumer technology preferences and online engagement with science content. While one may initially assume these two entities to be as different as apples and oranges, our rigorous data analysis reveals a compelling and statistically sound association that demands further exploration.
The ubiquitous presence of Apple's iPhone in the global consumer market is undeniable, with its quarterly sales figures serving as a barometer for technological trends and consumer preferences. Conversely, AsapSCIENCE, known for its succinct yet engaging science explainer videos, has amassed a substantial following on YouTube, with viewers expressing their appreciation through the deceptively simple click of the "like" button. These seemingly disparate domains converge in our analysis, prompting us to unravel the underlying factors that contribute to this unexpected correlation.
As we peer through the lens of quantitative analysis, it becomes apparent that the apparently whimsical world of YouTube likes holds surprising insights into consumer behavior. The modern era of digital engagement has bestowed upon us a treasure trove of data, serving as a canvas for statistical exploration. Our findings not only raise thought-provoking questions but also challenge traditional paradigms in understanding the interplay between consumer technology and digital engagement.
Through the lens of rigorous statistical methodologies, our investigation seeks to elevate the dialogue around the symbiotic relationship between online engagement and consumer choices. As we uncover the statistical whimsy that underpins this connection, we invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts alike to join us in pondering the unexpected and embracing the delightful dance of numbers in the digital age. Join us as we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, for it is in the unlikeliest of places that we often find the most delightful surprises.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the curious correlation between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos, our research team employed a multi-faceted approach blending statistical analysis with an appreciation for the whimsy of quirky correlations. The primary data sources for this study were Statista, providing comprehensive global sales figures for Apple's iPhone, and YouTube, offering a rich harvest of total likes for the popular AsapSCIENCE channel. Data spanning the years 2012 to 2018 were meticulously harvested, carefully avoiding any rotten apples and ensuring a bountiful crop of statistical morsels.

The first step of our convoluted yet captivating methodology involved the aggregation and cleansing of the raw data, akin to the meticulous sorting of ripe apples from those slightly bruised. Following this, our team harnessed the power of Excel to structure the dataset, planting the seeds for further statistical analysis. We then employed the Python programming language, a versatile orchard of analytical tools, to calculate the correlation coefficient and p-value, nurturing the flourishing relationship between iPhone sales data and AsapSCIENCE likes.

Intriguingly, we also ventured into the hallowed halls of econometric modeling, utilizing autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to season our findings with a touch of predictive analytics. This allowed us to forecast the future interplay between iPhone sales and AsapSCIENCE likes, akin to gazing into a crystal ball with a statistical lens.

Amidst this statistical orchard, our team also trotted into the land of time series analysis, harvesting the seasonal nuances of Q3 iPhone sales and its delightful dance with the ebb and flow of likes accrued by AsapSCIENCE videos. The application of such techniques imbued our findings with a sense of temporal poetry, immortalizing the rhythm of consumer engagement in the digital vineyards of YouTube.

Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we consulted with seasoned statisticians, ensuring that our analytical concoction remained free from any statistical apple turnovers. This rigorous peer consultation was akin to submitting our harvest to the discerning palates of expert connoisseurs, verifying that our morsels of statistical apple did not leave a sour taste on the scientific palate.

In sum, our methodology captures the essence of a whimsical yet rigorous exploration, akin to a scientific apple bobbing amidst a sea of statistical veracity. By embracing a blend of traditional statistical methods and a hint of zesty creativity, we have sought to capture the essence of this unexpected correlation, inviting fellow researchers to join in savoring the intellectual feast that stems from the delightful convergence of technological sales and digital engagement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and YouTube .

For the time period 2012 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8932686, r-squared of 0.7979288, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"iCan't Believe It's Apples and Likes: Exploring the Surprising Connection Between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the oh-so-serious world of data analysis to explore the unexpected relationship between two seemingly disparate entities: Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. Using robust data sourced from Statista and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine the correlation between these two phenomena. Upon conducting our analysis for the years 2012 to 2018, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8932686 and a p-value less than 0.01, shedding light on this quirky association. Our findings not only provoke contemplation on the intricacies of consumer behavior but also serve as a testament to the joyous, enigmatic dance of numbers in the modern digital era. As we navigate these uncharted waters of statistical whimsy, one can't help but ponder: could it be that the key to understanding consumer preferences lies in the seemingly whimsical realm of YouTube likes and global gadget sales?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of consumer behavior and digital media is an ever-evolving landscape, rife with perplexing correlations and unexpected connections. In this study, we embark on a journey to uncover the peculiar and enigmatic relationship between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. What may seem like an odd pairing at first glance unveils a fascinating intersection between consumer technology preferences and online engagement with science content. While one may initially assume these two entities to be as different as apples and oranges, our rigorous data analysis reveals a compelling and statistically sound association that demands further exploration.
The ubiquitous presence of Apple's iPhone in the global consumer market is undeniable, with its quarterly sales figures serving as a barometer for technological trends and consumer preferences. Conversely, AsapSCIENCE, known for its succinct yet engaging science explainer videos, has amassed a substantial following on YouTube, with viewers expressing their appreciation through the deceptively simple click of the "like" button. These seemingly disparate domains converge in our analysis, prompting us to unravel the underlying factors that contribute to this unexpected correlation.
As we peer through the lens of quantitative analysis, it becomes apparent that the apparently whimsical world of YouTube likes holds surprising insights into consumer behavior. The modern era of digital engagement has bestowed upon us a treasure trove of data, serving as a canvas for statistical exploration. Our findings not only raise thought-provoking questions but also challenge traditional paradigms in understanding the interplay between consumer technology and digital engagement.
Through the lens of rigorous statistical methodologies, our investigation seeks to elevate the dialogue around the symbiotic relationship between online engagement and consumer choices. As we uncover the statistical whimsy that underpins this connection, we invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts alike to join us in pondering the unexpected and embracing the delightful dance of numbers in the digital age. Join us as we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, for it is in the unlikeliest of places that we often find the most delightful surprises.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our quest to unravel the mysterious dance of numbers, we stumbled upon a rather captivating correlation between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. The Pearson correlation coefficient, a statistical measure of the strength and direction of the relationship, unveiled a value of 0.8932686 for the time period spanning 2012 to 2018. The notable r-squared value of 0.7979288 further underlined the robustness of this unexpected association.

Fig. 1 visually encapsulates this delightful surprise through a scatterplot, where the alignment of the data points corroborates the striking correlation we observed. The allure of statistics, it seems, knows no bounds, as it reveals the hidden connections that only a keen eye and a penchant for number-crunching can unveil.

It is quite the head-scratcher, isn't it? Who would have thought that the collective affection for thought-provoking science content on YouTube and the allure of Apple's latest technological marvel would converge in such an enigmatic manner? As we venture into the realms of consumer behavior and digital engagement, we are reminded that the world of data analysis is a stage where the most improbable of duets can take center stage.

Our p-value, surpassing the conventional threshold of 0.01, adds a touch of statistical rigidity to this whimsical tale, cementing the significance of our findings. It seems the data delights in teasing us with its unexpected twists and turns, leaving us to marvel at the mysteries it unfolds.

The statistical whimsy that has unraveled before our eyes not only provokes a wry smile, but also prompts a deeper contemplation on the intricate interplay between technological trends, online engagement, and consumer predilections. It is as if the digital realm, with its digital likes and pixelated gadget sales, has conspired to elude our expectations, making us rethink the very fabric of consumer preferences and the digital age.

In conclusion, our findings not only invite us to ponder the unlikeliest of connections but also emphasize the boundless nature of statistical exploration. It is in these moments of statistical serendipity that we are reminded of the whimsical, mischievous nature of data, always eager to lead us down unexpected paths.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"iCan't Believe It's Apples and Likes: Exploring the Surprising Connection Between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the oh-so-serious world of data analysis to explore the unexpected relationship between two seemingly disparate entities: Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. Using robust data sourced from Statista and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine the correlation between these two phenomena. Upon conducting our analysis for the years 2012 to 2018, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8932686 and a p-value less than 0.01, shedding light on this quirky association. Our findings not only provoke contemplation on the intricacies of consumer behavior but also serve as a testament to the joyous, enigmatic dance of numbers in the modern digital era. As we navigate these uncharted waters of statistical whimsy, one can't help but ponder: could it be that the key to understanding consumer preferences lies in the seemingly whimsical realm of YouTube likes and global gadget sales?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The academic exploration of seemingly incongruent phenomena has long been a pursuit of scholars seeking to unravel the intricacies of human behavior and digital engagement, prompting them to venture into statistical whimsy that often sets the stage for unexpected surprises. With bated breath, the authors delve into existing literature to situate the enigmatic linkage between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos in the broader scholarly context.
Smith and Doe (2015) contribute to the canon with their seminal work on consumer technology preferences, providing a sturdy foundation for our investigation. Their rigorous analysis of gadget sales trends offers valuable insights into the world of smartphones, setting the stage for our foray into the surprising correlation before us. Jones (2018) further enriches the discourse by addressing the nuances of digital engagement and its implications on consumer choices, paving the way for our investigation into the whimsical realm of YouTube likes.
In "Data and Digits: Unraveling Modern Consumer Trends," the authors ascertain the significance of quantitative data in illuminating consumer behaviors, paving the way for our plunge into the seemingly capricious world of YouTube engagement and gadget preferences. "The Science of Consumer Whimsy" by Applebaum (2019) offers a refreshingly quirky take on consumer choices, underscoring the unassuming charm of statistical whimsy in modern digital landscapes.
Venturing beyond the conventional pillars of academic literature, we draw inspiration from the timeless wisdom of non-fiction classics such as "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, shedding light on the unanticipated twists and turns of human decision-making that resonate with the essence of our exploration. Similarly, "Nudge" by Thaler and Sunstein underscores the underlying nudges and influences that steer consumer behavior, offering a whimsical lens through which we contemplate the unexpected dance of numbers in the digital age.
In the spirit of lighthearted academic discourse, we draw parallels to fictional narratives that echo the undercurrents of our investigation. From "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams to "Ready Player One" by Ernest Cline, the unexpected juxtapositions and delightful surprises within these narratives mirror the whimsical nature of our statistical exploration.
More surprisingly, memes such as "This is fine" dog and "Surprised Pikachu" occupy a peculiar but pertinent space in our discussion, serving as visual metaphors for the unexpected revelations that await as we navigate through the labyrinth of statistical whimsy.
In the whimsical world of statistical analysis, the literature surrounding the intersection of seemingly unrelated entities sets the stage for a journey that promises a delightful blend of insight and amusement, challenging conventions and embracing the unexpected with open arms. With this rich tapestry of academic and cultural influences in mind, we embark on our statistical escapade, eager to unearth the marvels that lie at the intersection of Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos.

[[RESULTS]]
In our quest to unravel the mysterious dance of numbers, we stumbled upon a rather captivating correlation between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. The Pearson correlation coefficient, a statistical measure of the strength and direction of the relationship, unveiled a value of 0.8932686 for the time period spanning 2012 to 2018. The notable r-squared value of 0.7979288 further underlined the robustness of this unexpected association.
Fig. 1 visually encapsulates this delightful surprise through a scatterplot, where the alignment of the data points corroborates the striking correlation we observed. The allure of statistics, it seems, knows no bounds, as it reveals the hidden connections that only a keen eye and a penchant for number-crunching can unveil.
It is quite the head-scratcher, isn't it? Who would have thought that the collective affection for thought-provoking science content on YouTube and the allure of Apple's latest technological marvel would converge in such an enigmatic manner? As we venture into the realms of consumer behavior and digital engagement, we are reminded that the world of data analysis is a stage where the most improbable of duets can take center stage.
Our p-value, surpassing the conventional threshold of 0.01, adds a touch of statistical rigidity to this whimsical tale, cementing the significance of our findings. It seems the data delights in teasing us with its unexpected twists and turns, leaving us to marvel at the mysteries it unfolds.
The statistical whimsy that has unraveled before our eyes not only provokes a wry smile, but also prompts a deeper contemplation on the intricate interplay between technological trends, online engagement, and consumer predilections. It is as if the digital realm, with its digital likes and pixelated gadget sales, has conspired to elude our expectations, making us rethink the very fabric of consumer preferences and the digital age.
In conclusion, our findings not only invite us to ponder the unlikeliest of connections but also emphasize the boundless nature of statistical exploration. It is in these moments of statistical serendipity that we are reminded of the whimsical, mischievous nature of data, always eager to lead us down unexpected paths.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our exploration into the curious relationship between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos has unveiled a surprising correlation that defies conventional wisdom. The unexpected dance of statistics has led us to quizzically ponder the interplay between consumer preferences for cutting-edge technology and captivating science content on the digital stage. In this section, we will delve into the implications of our findings and how they align with the whimsical undercurrent of existing literature, particularly those curious parallels to memes and fictional narratives that we initially approached with a twinkle in our scholarly eyes.

Our results, showcasing a hearty Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.8932686 and a robust r-squared value of 0.7979288, align with the whimsical strands of prior research that ventured into the capricious landscape of consumer behavior and digital engagement. Smith and Doe's (2015) groundwork on gadget sales trends resonates with our findings, as the allure of Apple's technological marvels finds an unexpected partner in the form of engaging science content on AsapSCIENCE's YouTube channel. Who would have thought that the gravitational pull of digital likes aligns so harmoniously with the orbit of gadget sales, reminiscent of a celestial waltz in the digital firmament?

Moreover, our results affirm the lighthearted parallels drawn to such fictional narratives as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and "Ready Player One," where unexpected juxtapositions mirror the whimsical nature of our statistical exploration. It seems that in the convoluted pathways of statistical whimsy, the digital realm has conspired to delight us with an unexpected duet that captures the essence of consumer choices and online engagement, inviting us to ponder the unlikeliest of connections with a bemused smile.

The pervasive influence of memes such as "This is fine" dog and "Surprised Pikachu" serves as a visual testament to the unexpected revelations that await us in this scholarly escapade. Who would have thought that these seemingly comical visual metaphors would find their way into a discussion of statistical significance and consumer preferences? The unexpected twists and turns of human decision-making indeed resonate with the essence of our investigation, as the whimsical nature of statistical exploration continues to surprise us at every turn.

In summary, our findings not only resonate with the whimsical undercurrent of prior research but also serve as a testament to the joyous, enigmatic dance of numbers in the modern digital era. The seemingly whimsical realm of YouTube likes and global gadget sales continues to unravel unexpected parallels, challenging conventions and embracing the unexpected with open arms. As we navigate these uncharted statistical waters, one can't help but marvel at the mysteries it unfolds, leaving us with a sense of statistical serendipity that is as delightful as it is thought-provoking. It is in these moments that we are reminded of the whimsical, mischievous nature of data, always eager to lead us down unexpected paths, leaving us to revel in the statistical surprises that abound in the digital age.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"iCan't Believe It's Apples and Likes: Exploring the Surprising Connection Between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the oh-so-serious world of data analysis to explore the unexpected relationship between two seemingly disparate entities: Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. Using robust data sourced from Statista and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine the correlation between these two phenomena. Upon conducting our analysis for the years 2012 to 2018, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8932686 and a p-value less than 0.01, shedding light on this quirky association. Our findings not only provoke contemplation on the intricacies of consumer behavior but also serve as a testament to the joyous, enigmatic dance of numbers in the modern digital era. As we navigate these uncharted waters of statistical whimsy, one can't help but ponder: could it be that the key to understanding consumer preferences lies in the seemingly whimsical realm of YouTube likes and global gadget sales?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of consumer behavior and digital media is an ever-evolving landscape, rife with perplexing correlations and unexpected connections. In this study, we embark on a journey to uncover the peculiar and enigmatic relationship between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. What may seem like an odd pairing at first glance unveils a fascinating intersection between consumer technology preferences and online engagement with science content. While one may initially assume these two entities to be as different as apples and oranges, our rigorous data analysis reveals a compelling and statistically sound association that demands further exploration.
The ubiquitous presence of Apple's iPhone in the global consumer market is undeniable, with its quarterly sales figures serving as a barometer for technological trends and consumer preferences. Conversely, AsapSCIENCE, known for its succinct yet engaging science explainer videos, has amassed a substantial following on YouTube, with viewers expressing their appreciation through the deceptively simple click of the "like" button. These seemingly disparate domains converge in our analysis, prompting us to unravel the underlying factors that contribute to this unexpected correlation.
As we peer through the lens of quantitative analysis, it becomes apparent that the apparently whimsical world of YouTube likes holds surprising insights into consumer behavior. The modern era of digital engagement has bestowed upon us a treasure trove of data, serving as a canvas for statistical exploration. Our findings not only raise thought-provoking questions but also challenge traditional paradigms in understanding the interplay between consumer technology and digital engagement.
Through the lens of rigorous statistical methodologies, our investigation seeks to elevate the dialogue around the symbiotic relationship between online engagement and consumer choices. As we uncover the statistical whimsy that underpins this connection, we invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts alike to join us in pondering the unexpected and embracing the delightful dance of numbers in the digital age. Join us as we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, for it is in the unlikeliest of places that we often find the most delightful surprises.

[[RESULTS]]
In our quest to unravel the mysterious dance of numbers, we stumbled upon a rather captivating correlation between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. The Pearson correlation coefficient, a statistical measure of the strength and direction of the relationship, unveiled a value of 0.8932686 for the time period spanning 2012 to 2018. The notable r-squared value of 0.7979288 further underlined the robustness of this unexpected association.
Fig. 1 visually encapsulates this delightful surprise through a scatterplot, where the alignment of the data points corroborates the striking correlation we observed. The allure of statistics, it seems, knows no bounds, as it reveals the hidden connections that only a keen eye and a penchant for number-crunching can unveil.
It is quite the head-scratcher, isn't it? Who would have thought that the collective affection for thought-provoking science content on YouTube and the allure of Apple's latest technological marvel would converge in such an enigmatic manner? As we venture into the realms of consumer behavior and digital engagement, we are reminded that the world of data analysis is a stage where the most improbable of duets can take center stage.
Our p-value, surpassing the conventional threshold of 0.01, adds a touch of statistical rigidity to this whimsical tale, cementing the significance of our findings. It seems the data delights in teasing us with its unexpected twists and turns, leaving us to marvel at the mysteries it unfolds.
The statistical whimsy that has unraveled before our eyes not only provokes a wry smile, but also prompts a deeper contemplation on the intricate interplay between technological trends, online engagement, and consumer predilections. It is as if the digital realm, with its digital likes and pixelated gadget sales, has conspired to elude our expectations, making us rethink the very fabric of consumer preferences and the digital age.
In conclusion, our findings not only invite us to ponder the unlikeliest of connections but also emphasize the boundless nature of statistical exploration. It is in these moments of statistical serendipity that we are reminded of the whimsical, mischievous nature of data, always eager to lead us down unexpected paths.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we draw the curtains on this enthralling exploration, we find ourselves astounded by the delightful dance of numbers that has unfolded before us. Our foray into the statistical whimsy of consumer behavior has revealed a correlation of 0.8932686 between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos, leaving no trace of doubt about the enigmatic bond between these seemingly disparate entities. The statistical embrace between these phenomena, captured vividly in Fig. 1, reminds us that in the realm of data analysis, truth can be stranger than fiction.

The p-value, standing as a testament to the robustness of our findings, adds a touch of statistical flair to our narrative. It's as if the data itself is urging us to appreciate the unexpected harmony it has unveiled. It is in these moments of statistical serendipity that we must pause to marvel at the playful caprice of numbers.

As we bid adieu to this whimsical tale of consumer technology and digital engagement, we cannot help but acknowledge the unsung heroes of statistical exploration – the numbers that, when teased and prodded, reveal the most astonishing connections. The unexpected camaraderie between global gadget sales and online science enthusiasm beckons us to push the boundaries of conventional thinking and embrace the capricious nature of statistical inquiry.

In closing, we must declare that no further research is warranted in this area. The statistical whimsy that has unfurled before us presents a compelling case, leaving little room for doubt or further investigation. It is a tale we shall recount with a wry smile and a nod to the fickle nature of statistical intrigue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited iCan't Believe It's Apples and Likes: Exploring the Surprising Connection Between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Digital Fruit Consumption Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited iCan't Believe It's Apples and Likes: Exploring the Surprising Connection Between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Data Analysis and Humorous Research Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled iCan't Believe It's Apples and Likes: Exploring the Surprising Connection Between Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the oh-so-serious world of data analysis to explore the unexpected relationship between two seemingly disparate entities: Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 and Total Likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube Videos. Using robust data sourced from Statista and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical methods to examine the correlation between these two phenomena. Upon conducting our analysis for the years 2012 to 2018, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8932686 and a p-value less than 0.01, shedding light on this quirky association. Our findings not only provoke contemplation on the intricacies of consumer behavior but also serve as a testament to the joyous, enigmatic dance of numbers in the modern digital era. As we navigate these uncharted waters of statistical whimsy, one can't help but ponder: could it be that the key to understanding consumer preferences lies in the seemingly whimsical realm of YouTube likes and global gadget sales?

ChatGPT:

YouTube likes, AsapSCIENCE, Apple iPhone Sales, Q3, correlation, consumer behavior, statistical analysis, data analysis, Statista, YouTube data, correlation coefficient, p-value, consumer preferences, digital era

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3

Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.8932686 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7979288 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3) over the 7 years from 2012 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0067. 0.0067435655237594325000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.67% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 148 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.43, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018
Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 (Units)26030000312400003520000047530000404000004103000046890000
Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos (Total likes)1098390313647023657904797100294406033739205712320




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([26030000,31240000,35200000,47530000,40400000,41030000,46890000,])
array_2 = np.array([1098390,3136470,2365790,4797100,2944060,3373920,5712320,])
array_1_name = "Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3"
array_2_name = "Total likes of AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4332 · Black Variable ID: 154 · Red Variable ID: 25848
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0