about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,308 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin and the second variable is The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin.  The chart goes from 2010 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality improved in Madison, Wisconsin, the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators decreased because there was less 'sticky' particulate matter for them to 'bond' with in the air. It seems like the job market for them just couldn't 'adhere' to the same levels when the pollution cleared!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A scene from 'Star Wars'] Generate an image of a bustling industrial area in Madison, Wisconsin. The city's skyline stands in the background, with clear blue skies and clean air. In the foreground, depict a group of adhesive bonding machine operators standing near their equipment. Show the operators conversing with each other as the air around them visibly clears up. The decrease in sticky particulate matter is evident, implying a reduction in demand for their services. Capture the industrial setting and the effects of the air pollution clearing up on the operators' job market in an artful and visually impactful way. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Surrealism Cyber folk Oragami Concept art
ChatGPT: A scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin, in the following situation: As the air quality improved in Madison, Wisconsin, the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators decreased because there was less 'sticky' particulate matter for them to 'bond' with in the air. It seems like the job market for them just couldn't 'adhere' to the same levels when the pollution cleared!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling industrial area of Madison, Wisconsin, the once heavy smog and air pollution is clearing up, revealing the city's skyline in crisp detail. Nearby, a group of adhesive bonding machine operators stand chatting by their equipment, as the air around them becomes noticeably cleaner. The decrease in sticky particulate matter in the air means their services are no longer in such high demand, and the job market for operators seems to be less 'adhering' to the same levels as before.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling industrial area of Madison, Wisconsin, the once heavy smog and air pollution is clearing up, revealing the city's skyline in crisp detail. Nearby, a group of adhesive bonding machine operators stand chatting by their equipment, as the air around them becomes noticeably cleaner. The decrease in sticky particulate matter in the air means their services are no longer in such high demand, and the job market for operators seems to be less 'adhering' to the same levels as before. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A scene from 'Star Wars'] Generate an image of a bustling industrial area in Madison, Wisconsin. The city's skyline stands in the background, with clear blue skies and clean air. In the foreground, depict a group of adhesive bonding machine operators standing near their equipment. Show the operators conversing with each other as the air around them visibly clears up. The decrease in sticky particulate matter is evident, implying a reduction in demand for their services. Capture the industrial setting and the effects of the air pollution clearing up on the operators' job market in an artful and visually impactful way.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin caused The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Breathing in the Connection: The Correlation Between Air Pollution and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators in Wisconsin

The Journal of Atmospheric Adhesives

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Connection: The Correlation Between Air Pollution and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators in Wisconsin"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin, and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in the entire state. The idea may initially stick with you as absurd, but our research uncovers a surprising adhesive correlation. We set out to answer the question: Does a rise in air pollution levels lead to more job opportunities for adhesive bonding machine operators, or is it just an uncanny coincidence? Our study, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2010 to 2022, has revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us in a sticky situation with our findings.

We present evidence that air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, seem to bond with the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in the state as a whole. One might say the results have really stuck with us! However, it's essential to note that correlation does not imply causation, and further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms behind this peculiar connection. Nevertheless, these findings provide a thought-provoking insight into the potential impact of air quality on the labor market, showing that when it comes to employment, the job market can sometimes be quite "adhesive" to environmental conditions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Connection: The Correlation Between Air Pollution and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators in Wisconsin"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin, and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in the entire state. The idea may initially stick with you as absurd, but our research uncovers a surprising adhesive correlation. We set out to answer the question: Does a rise in air pollution levels lead to more job opportunities for adhesive bonding machine operators, or is it just an uncanny coincidence? Our study, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2010 to 2022, has revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us in a sticky situation with our findings.

We present evidence that air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, seem to bond with the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in the state as a whole. One might say the results have really stuck with us! However, it's essential to note that correlation does not imply causation, and further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms behind this peculiar connection. Nevertheless, these findings provide a thought-provoking insight into the potential impact of air quality on the labor market, showing that when it comes to employment, the job market can sometimes be quite "adhesive" to environmental conditions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the old saying goes, "the air we breathe affects us more than we know." In the case of Madison, Wisconsin, this statement holds true in more ways than one. The considerable growth in urbanization and industrialization has led to an increase in air pollution levels, giving rise to a pressing need to study its implications. On the other hand, the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin presents an interesting enigma. It seems we've stumbled upon a situation where the job market and the atmosphere become intertwined in a rather unexpected manner. One might say the correlation is as strong as super glue!

Air pollution has often been the subject of extensive research, with its detrimental effects on human health and the environment well-documented. However, its potential impact on the labor market, particularly the demand for specific job roles, has received relatively limited attention. This paper aims to fill that gap, not only shedding light on the relationship between air pollution and employment but also emphasizing the need for comprehensive, interdisciplinary approaches to understanding labor market dynamics. After all, we're not just sticking to the conventional wisdom here!

The prevalence of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin adds another layer of intrigue to this puzzle. The relevance of this role in various industrial processes is undeniable, yet the interplay between environmental factors and job availability in this specific occupation has remained largely unexplored. Our research sets out to immerse itself in this uncharted territory, peeling back the layers of statistical data to reveal the adhesive bond between air quality and employment opportunities. The puns, however, were purely intentional!

In the following sections, we will present our findings, the statistical analysis of the correlation, and potential implications for policymakers, environmental organizations, and industries reliant on adhesive bonding technologies. Through this inquiry, we aim to not only elucidate the connection between air pollution and the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators but also to inspire future research endeavors, encouraging scholars to think outside the box – or in this case, outside the clean air zones!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Connection: The Correlation Between Air Pollution and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators in Wisconsin"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin, and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in the entire state. The idea may initially stick with you as absurd, but our research uncovers a surprising adhesive correlation. We set out to answer the question: Does a rise in air pollution levels lead to more job opportunities for adhesive bonding machine operators, or is it just an uncanny coincidence? Our study, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2010 to 2022, has revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us in a sticky situation with our findings.

We present evidence that air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, seem to bond with the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in the state as a whole. One might say the results have really stuck with us! However, it's essential to note that correlation does not imply causation, and further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms behind this peculiar connection. Nevertheless, these findings provide a thought-provoking insight into the potential impact of air quality on the labor market, showing that when it comes to employment, the job market can sometimes be quite "adhesive" to environmental conditions.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old saying goes, "the air we breathe affects us more than we know." In the case of Madison, Wisconsin, this statement holds true in more ways than one. The considerable growth in urbanization and industrialization has led to an increase in air pollution levels, giving rise to a pressing need to study its implications. On the other hand, the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin presents an interesting enigma. It seems we've stumbled upon a situation where the job market and the atmosphere become intertwined in a rather unexpected manner. One might say the correlation is as strong as super glue!
Air pollution has often been the subject of extensive research, with its detrimental effects on human health and the environment well-documented. However, its potential impact on the labor market, particularly the demand for specific job roles, has received relatively limited attention. This paper aims to fill that gap, not only shedding light on the relationship between air pollution and employment but also emphasizing the need for comprehensive, interdisciplinary approaches to understanding labor market dynamics. After all, we're not just sticking to the conventional wisdom here!
The prevalence of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin adds another layer of intrigue to this puzzle. The relevance of this role in various industrial processes is undeniable, yet the interplay between environmental factors and job availability in this specific occupation has remained largely unexplored. Our research sets out to immerse itself in this uncharted territory, peeling back the layers of statistical data to reveal the adhesive bond between air quality and employment opportunities. The puns, however, were purely intentional!
In the following sections, we will present our findings, the statistical analysis of the correlation, and potential implications for policymakers, environmental organizations, and industries reliant on adhesive bonding technologies. Through this inquiry, we aim to not only elucidate the connection between air pollution and the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators but also to inspire future research endeavors, encouraging scholars to think outside the box – or in this case, outside the clean air zones!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, "The Effects of Air Pollution on Labor Markets," Smith et al. (2015) explored the impact of air quality on employment trends, focusing primarily on urban areas. Their comprehensive analysis revealed compelling evidence of the influence of air pollution levels on job availability, sparking widespread interest in the intersection of environmental factors and labor dynamics. The findings, much like a balloon filled with hot air, have inflated our understanding of the multifaceted relationship between air quality and employment opportunities.

Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a study titled "Occupational Demand in a Polluted Environment," investigating the occupational preferences and shifts in employment patterns in regions with varying pollution levels. Their research highlighted the adaptability of the labor market to environmental conditions, pointing to the resiliency of certain occupations in the face of environmental challenges. It seems that some jobs are just as sticky as duct tape, no matter the air quality!

Turning to non-fiction literature related to our inquiry, "The Economics of Pollution" by Johnson (2017) delves into the economic repercussions of environmental pollution, offering valuable insights into the broader ramifications of polluted air on various economic sectors. Meanwhile, "Air Quality Management" by White (2019) provides a comprehensive overview of strategies and policies aimed at mitigating the adverse effects of air pollution, shedding light on the complexities of addressing environmental concerns in a rapidly industrializing world.

In the realm of fiction, books such as "The Smog Chronicles" by Green (2020) and "Toxic Air: A Tale of Love and Pollution" by Black (2016) explore the narrative potential of environmental degradation, albeit in a more imaginative and speculative manner. While these works may not directly contribute to our scholarly endeavor, they remind us that even in the world of literature, the air is thick with creativity – no pun intended!

Expanding our scope to unconventional sources, a perusal of CVS receipts surprisingly yielded intriguing insights. The correlation between purchases of air purifiers and sales of adhesive products was, to put it simply, adhesively remarkable. It seems that amidst the mundane items listed on those lengthy receipts, there's a peculiar affinity between clean air enthusiasts and those with an affinity for, let's say, stickier pursuits. Who knew that the path to understanding labor market trends often lay in the seemingly mundane evidence of retail transactions?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2010 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Connection: The Correlation Between Air Pollution and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators in Wisconsin"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin, and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in the entire state. The idea may initially stick with you as absurd, but our research uncovers a surprising adhesive correlation. We set out to answer the question: Does a rise in air pollution levels lead to more job opportunities for adhesive bonding machine operators, or is it just an uncanny coincidence? Our study, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2010 to 2022, has revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us in a sticky situation with our findings.

We present evidence that air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, seem to bond with the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in the state as a whole. One might say the results have really stuck with us! However, it's essential to note that correlation does not imply causation, and further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms behind this peculiar connection. Nevertheless, these findings provide a thought-provoking insight into the potential impact of air quality on the labor market, showing that when it comes to employment, the job market can sometimes be quite "adhesive" to environmental conditions.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old saying goes, "the air we breathe affects us more than we know." In the case of Madison, Wisconsin, this statement holds true in more ways than one. The considerable growth in urbanization and industrialization has led to an increase in air pollution levels, giving rise to a pressing need to study its implications. On the other hand, the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin presents an interesting enigma. It seems we've stumbled upon a situation where the job market and the atmosphere become intertwined in a rather unexpected manner. One might say the correlation is as strong as super glue!
Air pollution has often been the subject of extensive research, with its detrimental effects on human health and the environment well-documented. However, its potential impact on the labor market, particularly the demand for specific job roles, has received relatively limited attention. This paper aims to fill that gap, not only shedding light on the relationship between air pollution and employment but also emphasizing the need for comprehensive, interdisciplinary approaches to understanding labor market dynamics. After all, we're not just sticking to the conventional wisdom here!
The prevalence of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin adds another layer of intrigue to this puzzle. The relevance of this role in various industrial processes is undeniable, yet the interplay between environmental factors and job availability in this specific occupation has remained largely unexplored. Our research sets out to immerse itself in this uncharted territory, peeling back the layers of statistical data to reveal the adhesive bond between air quality and employment opportunities. The puns, however, were purely intentional!
In the following sections, we will present our findings, the statistical analysis of the correlation, and potential implications for policymakers, environmental organizations, and industries reliant on adhesive bonding technologies. Through this inquiry, we aim to not only elucidate the connection between air pollution and the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators but also to inspire future research endeavors, encouraging scholars to think outside the box – or in this case, outside the clean air zones!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the intriguing link between air pollution and the employment of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin, our research team embarked on a meticulous process of data collection and analysis. We aimed to stick to the facts and avoid any slippery slopes or hasty conclusions – after all, this isn't your run-of-the-mill research topic.

Our first step involved gathering air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the Madison, Wisconsin area. We didn't just want to take a whiff of the data; we wanted to inhale it deeply. We included measurements of pollutants such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone (O3). We wanted to be "comprehensive" in our approach, much like the air quality index itself – pun intended.

Next, we sought to find data on the employment figures for adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). We weren't just gluing our research together; we were ensuring a strong molecular bond between the datasets. We carefully handled the employment data, making sure not to get stuck in a pattern of errors. We needed to handle it with care - after all, it’s not every day you get to work with such a unique dataset.

Once we had our hands on the pertinent data, we engaged in a process of statistical analysis. Using sophisticated software, we calculated correlation coefficients to measure the strength of the relationship between air pollution levels in Madison and the employment of adhesive bonding machine operators statewide. We took our time, making sure not to rush the analysis; after all, good things come to those who wait. The statistical techniques used were as robust as industrial-grade adhesive, ensuring the reliability of our findings.

In order to assess the significance of the correlation, we conducted hypothesis testing. We rigorously examined the p-values to determine whether the observed relationship was likely to be due to chance. We didn't just stick to the surface level; we delved deep into the statistical underpinnings of our findings.

Additionally, we accounted for potential confounding variables, such as economic trends, technological advancements in adhesive bonding, and industrial shifts in Wisconsin. We didn't want our results to lose their grip on reality; thus, we remained diligent in addressing any alternative explanations for our observed correlation. It was crucial to ensure that our conclusions weren't unstuck by lurking variables.

Finally, to validate our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of the correlation under different scenarios and time frames. We wanted to make sure this wasn’t just a fluke; the correlation had to hold steady under various conditions. We needed our results to be as reliable as the stickiness of a well-applied adhesive bond.

In summary, our research methodology involved a careful and systematic approach to gather, analyze, and interpret the data. We didn’t just pull any old methodology out of thin air; we crafted it with precision and care to ensure our findings would stick.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2010 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8671169, r-squared of 0.7518918, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Connection: The Correlation Between Air Pollution and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators in Wisconsin"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin, and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in the entire state. The idea may initially stick with you as absurd, but our research uncovers a surprising adhesive correlation. We set out to answer the question: Does a rise in air pollution levels lead to more job opportunities for adhesive bonding machine operators, or is it just an uncanny coincidence? Our study, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2010 to 2022, has revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us in a sticky situation with our findings.

We present evidence that air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, seem to bond with the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in the state as a whole. One might say the results have really stuck with us! However, it's essential to note that correlation does not imply causation, and further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms behind this peculiar connection. Nevertheless, these findings provide a thought-provoking insight into the potential impact of air quality on the labor market, showing that when it comes to employment, the job market can sometimes be quite "adhesive" to environmental conditions.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the old saying goes, "the air we breathe affects us more than we know." In the case of Madison, Wisconsin, this statement holds true in more ways than one. The considerable growth in urbanization and industrialization has led to an increase in air pollution levels, giving rise to a pressing need to study its implications. On the other hand, the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin presents an interesting enigma. It seems we've stumbled upon a situation where the job market and the atmosphere become intertwined in a rather unexpected manner. One might say the correlation is as strong as super glue!
Air pollution has often been the subject of extensive research, with its detrimental effects on human health and the environment well-documented. However, its potential impact on the labor market, particularly the demand for specific job roles, has received relatively limited attention. This paper aims to fill that gap, not only shedding light on the relationship between air pollution and employment but also emphasizing the need for comprehensive, interdisciplinary approaches to understanding labor market dynamics. After all, we're not just sticking to the conventional wisdom here!
The prevalence of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin adds another layer of intrigue to this puzzle. The relevance of this role in various industrial processes is undeniable, yet the interplay between environmental factors and job availability in this specific occupation has remained largely unexplored. Our research sets out to immerse itself in this uncharted territory, peeling back the layers of statistical data to reveal the adhesive bond between air quality and employment opportunities. The puns, however, were purely intentional!
In the following sections, we will present our findings, the statistical analysis of the correlation, and potential implications for policymakers, environmental organizations, and industries reliant on adhesive bonding technologies. Through this inquiry, we aim to not only elucidate the connection between air pollution and the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators but also to inspire future research endeavors, encouraging scholars to think outside the box – or in this case, outside the clean air zones!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data, spanning from 2010 to 2022, has revealed a noteworthy correlation between air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in the entire state. The correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 and an r-squared of 0.7518918 suggest a strong positive relationship between these two variables. It appears that the rise and fall of air pollutants are closely tied to the employment prospects of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin. It seems the bond between them is quite sticky, wouldn't you say?

Further bolstering our findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this correlation is statistically significant. Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot demonstrating the clear, adhesive-like relationship between air pollution levels and the employment of adhesive bonding machine operators. The data points adhere closely to the trend line, leaving little room for doubt about the strength of this connection.

We must acknowledge that while our results highlight the strong correlation, they do not imply causation. That being said, as researchers, we cannot help but feel a certain "bond" with our findings. This correlation prompts the question: Does a degradation in air quality lead to an upsurge in the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators, or is this merely the consequence of an unexplored, coincidental association? As a wise adhesive bonding machine operator once said, "It's all about sticking to what works!"

These findings have various implications for the understanding of labor market dynamics and environmental factors' impact on occupational demand. As we delve deeper into this unexpected connection, it's evident that we've peeled back a layer of complexity in the interplay between air pollution and employment. It seems that in the world of labor economics, the job market can't help but find itself "bonding" with environmental conditions in unexpected ways!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Connection: The Correlation Between Air Pollution and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators in Wisconsin"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin, and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in the entire state. The idea may initially stick with you as absurd, but our research uncovers a surprising adhesive correlation. We set out to answer the question: Does a rise in air pollution levels lead to more job opportunities for adhesive bonding machine operators, or is it just an uncanny coincidence? Our study, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2010 to 2022, has revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us in a sticky situation with our findings.

We present evidence that air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, seem to bond with the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in the state as a whole. One might say the results have really stuck with us! However, it's essential to note that correlation does not imply causation, and further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms behind this peculiar connection. Nevertheless, these findings provide a thought-provoking insight into the potential impact of air quality on the labor market, showing that when it comes to employment, the job market can sometimes be quite "adhesive" to environmental conditions.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, "The Effects of Air Pollution on Labor Markets," Smith et al. (2015) explored the impact of air quality on employment trends, focusing primarily on urban areas. Their comprehensive analysis revealed compelling evidence of the influence of air pollution levels on job availability, sparking widespread interest in the intersection of environmental factors and labor dynamics. The findings, much like a balloon filled with hot air, have inflated our understanding of the multifaceted relationship between air quality and employment opportunities.
Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a study titled "Occupational Demand in a Polluted Environment," investigating the occupational preferences and shifts in employment patterns in regions with varying pollution levels. Their research highlighted the adaptability of the labor market to environmental conditions, pointing to the resiliency of certain occupations in the face of environmental challenges. It seems that some jobs are just as sticky as duct tape, no matter the air quality!
Turning to non-fiction literature related to our inquiry, "The Economics of Pollution" by Johnson (2017) delves into the economic repercussions of environmental pollution, offering valuable insights into the broader ramifications of polluted air on various economic sectors. Meanwhile, "Air Quality Management" by White (2019) provides a comprehensive overview of strategies and policies aimed at mitigating the adverse effects of air pollution, shedding light on the complexities of addressing environmental concerns in a rapidly industrializing world.
In the realm of fiction, books such as "The Smog Chronicles" by Green (2020) and "Toxic Air: A Tale of Love and Pollution" by Black (2016) explore the narrative potential of environmental degradation, albeit in a more imaginative and speculative manner. While these works may not directly contribute to our scholarly endeavor, they remind us that even in the world of literature, the air is thick with creativity – no pun intended!
Expanding our scope to unconventional sources, a perusal of CVS receipts surprisingly yielded intriguing insights. The correlation between purchases of air purifiers and sales of adhesive products was, to put it simply, adhesively remarkable. It seems that amidst the mundane items listed on those lengthy receipts, there's a peculiar affinity between clean air enthusiasts and those with an affinity for, let's say, stickier pursuits. Who knew that the path to understanding labor market trends often lay in the seemingly mundane evidence of retail transactions?

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data, spanning from 2010 to 2022, has revealed a noteworthy correlation between air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in the entire state. The correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 and an r-squared of 0.7518918 suggest a strong positive relationship between these two variables. It appears that the rise and fall of air pollutants are closely tied to the employment prospects of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin. It seems the bond between them is quite sticky, wouldn't you say?
Further bolstering our findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this correlation is statistically significant. Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot demonstrating the clear, adhesive-like relationship between air pollution levels and the employment of adhesive bonding machine operators. The data points adhere closely to the trend line, leaving little room for doubt about the strength of this connection.
We must acknowledge that while our results highlight the strong correlation, they do not imply causation. That being said, as researchers, we cannot help but feel a certain "bond" with our findings. This correlation prompts the question: Does a degradation in air quality lead to an upsurge in the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators, or is this merely the consequence of an unexplored, coincidental association? As a wise adhesive bonding machine operator once said, "It's all about sticking to what works!"
These findings have various implications for the understanding of labor market dynamics and environmental factors' impact on occupational demand. As we delve deeper into this unexpected connection, it's evident that we've peeled back a layer of complexity in the interplay between air pollution and employment. It seems that in the world of labor economics, the job market can't help but find itself "bonding" with environmental conditions in unexpected ways!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results echo and expand upon the prior research, underscoring the adhesive bond between air pollution and the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators. Smith et al.'s (2015) findings on the effects of air pollution on employment align with our discovery of a strong correlation between air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, and the prevalence of adhesive bonding machine operator positions in the state. It seems that when it comes to the labor market, the air in Madison might indeed be "adhesively" influencing occupational trends. Whether it's a high-pressure system or an industrial complex, the factors contributing to this connection remain an enigma, much like the mystery of what makes glue stick.

Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) pointed to the adaptability of the labor market to environmental conditions, a sentiment we observe in the resilience of the adhesive bonding machine operator occupation amidst varying pollution levels. Our own findings support the notion that some jobs have the staying power of a well-applied adhesive, maintaining their relevance irrespective of air quality fluctuations. On the other hand, the fact that air pollution levels seem to have a substantial impact on the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators adds a layer of complexity to the adaptability of the labor market. It appears that when it comes to occupational demand, the stickiness of the air can't be easily peeled away.

Lest we forget the humorous anecdote from our literature review, the correlation we found is no joke. The connection between air purifier sales and adhesive product purchases highlighted an unexpected link akin to the one we've uncovered. It appears that purchasing decisions and labor market trends are both, in some sense, stuck with a commonality influenced by air quality. Such odd convergences continue to demonstrate that the world of empirical research is not without a bit of whimsy.

Our study, like a properly executed adhesive bond, has served to bring attention to a largely overlooked yet intriguing relationship between environmental conditions and employment trends. The thought-provoking insight provided by our findings not only adds a new layer of complexity to the understanding of labor market dynamics but also emphasizes the need for further exploration of the mechanisms underlying this correlation. It seems that when it comes to understanding the intricacies of the labor market, the way forward is to stick with an open mind and continue unraveling the persistent mysteries that bond the job market and the surrounding environment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin and The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Breathing in the Connection: The Correlation Between Air Pollution and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators in Wisconsin"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin, and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in the entire state. The idea may initially stick with you as absurd, but our research uncovers a surprising adhesive correlation. We set out to answer the question: Does a rise in air pollution levels lead to more job opportunities for adhesive bonding machine operators, or is it just an uncanny coincidence? Our study, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2010 to 2022, has revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us in a sticky situation with our findings.

We present evidence that air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, seem to bond with the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in the state as a whole. One might say the results have really stuck with us! However, it's essential to note that correlation does not imply causation, and further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms behind this peculiar connection. Nevertheless, these findings provide a thought-provoking insight into the potential impact of air quality on the labor market, showing that when it comes to employment, the job market can sometimes be quite "adhesive" to environmental conditions.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the old saying goes, "the air we breathe affects us more than we know." In the case of Madison, Wisconsin, this statement holds true in more ways than one. The considerable growth in urbanization and industrialization has led to an increase in air pollution levels, giving rise to a pressing need to study its implications. On the other hand, the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin presents an interesting enigma. It seems we've stumbled upon a situation where the job market and the atmosphere become intertwined in a rather unexpected manner. One might say the correlation is as strong as super glue!
Air pollution has often been the subject of extensive research, with its detrimental effects on human health and the environment well-documented. However, its potential impact on the labor market, particularly the demand for specific job roles, has received relatively limited attention. This paper aims to fill that gap, not only shedding light on the relationship between air pollution and employment but also emphasizing the need for comprehensive, interdisciplinary approaches to understanding labor market dynamics. After all, we're not just sticking to the conventional wisdom here!
The prevalence of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin adds another layer of intrigue to this puzzle. The relevance of this role in various industrial processes is undeniable, yet the interplay between environmental factors and job availability in this specific occupation has remained largely unexplored. Our research sets out to immerse itself in this uncharted territory, peeling back the layers of statistical data to reveal the adhesive bond between air quality and employment opportunities. The puns, however, were purely intentional!
In the following sections, we will present our findings, the statistical analysis of the correlation, and potential implications for policymakers, environmental organizations, and industries reliant on adhesive bonding technologies. Through this inquiry, we aim to not only elucidate the connection between air pollution and the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators but also to inspire future research endeavors, encouraging scholars to think outside the box – or in this case, outside the clean air zones!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data, spanning from 2010 to 2022, has revealed a noteworthy correlation between air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in the entire state. The correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 and an r-squared of 0.7518918 suggest a strong positive relationship between these two variables. It appears that the rise and fall of air pollutants are closely tied to the employment prospects of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin. It seems the bond between them is quite sticky, wouldn't you say?
Further bolstering our findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this correlation is statistically significant. Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot demonstrating the clear, adhesive-like relationship between air pollution levels and the employment of adhesive bonding machine operators. The data points adhere closely to the trend line, leaving little room for doubt about the strength of this connection.
We must acknowledge that while our results highlight the strong correlation, they do not imply causation. That being said, as researchers, we cannot help but feel a certain "bond" with our findings. This correlation prompts the question: Does a degradation in air quality lead to an upsurge in the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators, or is this merely the consequence of an unexplored, coincidental association? As a wise adhesive bonding machine operator once said, "It's all about sticking to what works!"
These findings have various implications for the understanding of labor market dynamics and environmental factors' impact on occupational demand. As we delve deeper into this unexpected connection, it's evident that we've peeled back a layer of complexity in the interplay between air pollution and employment. It seems that in the world of labor economics, the job market can't help but find itself "bonding" with environmental conditions in unexpected ways!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has revealed an intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, and the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators across the entire state. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 indicates a strong positive relationship, leaving us in a rather "sticky" situation with our findings. It seems that when it comes to employment opportunities for adhesive bonding machine operators, the air quality in Madison has more influence than we initially anticipated! One might even joke that these results "adhered" to our expectations.

While our study sheds light on this peculiar association, it's crucial to remember that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. As the saying goes, "just because two things are stuck together, it doesn't mean one caused the other!" The next step in this "bonding" adventure would involve delving into the underlying mechanisms driving this connection. After all, we don't want to get "tangled up" in assumptions about causality!

The potential implications of our findings extend beyond the field of labor economics. Understanding the interplay between environmental factors and job availability opens doors for targeted policy interventions and industry adaptations, aiming to maintain a "strong bond" between employment and environmental sustainability. This correlation illustrates the need for a multidisciplinary approach to unravel the intricate web of relationships shaping the labor market. Who knew the labor market could be as "sticky" as adhesive bonding itself?

In the grand scheme of things, it's tempting to crack a joke or two about these unexpected findings, but let's not get carried away. It's evident that this curious correlation highlights the intricate dance between environmental conditions and labor dynamics. However, at this point, we can confidently declare that no further research is needed in this area. We've "sealed the deal," so to speak, and it's time to stick a pin in it and move on to the next fascinating puzzle in the world of labor economics!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Breathing in the Connection: The Correlation Between Air Pollution and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators in Wisconsin. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Atmospheric Adhesives


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Breathing in the Connection: The Correlation Between Air Pollution and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators in Wisconsin. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Clean Air Technology and Workplace Health


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Breathing in the Connection: The Correlation Between Air Pollution and Adhesive Bonding Machine Operators in Wisconsin with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin, and the number of adhesive bonding machine operators in the entire state. The idea may initially stick with you as absurd, but our research uncovers a surprising adhesive correlation. We set out to answer the question: Does a rise in air pollution levels lead to more job opportunities for adhesive bonding machine operators, or is it just an uncanny coincidence? Our study, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2010 to 2022, has revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8671169 with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us in a sticky situation with our findings.
We present evidence that air pollution levels in Madison, Wisconsin, seem to bond with the demand for adhesive bonding machine operators in the state as a whole. One might say the results have really stuck with us! However, it's essential to note that correlation does not imply causation, and further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms behind this peculiar connection. Nevertheless, these findings provide a thought-provoking insight into the potential impact of air quality on the labor market, showing that when it comes to employment, the job market can sometimes be quite "adhesive" to environmental conditions.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, adhesive bonding machine operators, Wisconsin, correlation, job opportunities, Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Madison, air quality, labor market

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Madison, WI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin

The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of adhesive bonding machine operators and tenders in Wisconsin
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin

Correlation r = 0.8671169 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7518918 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin) over the 13 years from 2010 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00012. 0.0001239797919680719300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 8,066 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin (Bad air quality days)47.175134.261840.281735.342530.13723.033718.836619.832425.753421.917822.404432.876718.0822
The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin (Laborers)630620620550460330290160240240480440190




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([47.1751,34.2618,40.2817,35.3425,30.137,23.0337,18.8366,19.8324,25.7534,21.9178,22.4044,32.8767,18.0822,])
array_2 = np.array([630,620,620,550,460,330,290,160,240,240,480,440,190,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Madison, Wisconsin"
array_2_name = "The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Wisconsin"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4308 · Black Variable ID: 20855 · Red Variable ID: 18784
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0