about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,578 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska and the second variable is Hollister retail store count worldwide.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska increased, it led to a surplus of soy products. This surplus of soy products somehow sparked a sudden global fashion craze for denim overalls and plaid shirts, ultimately prompting the expansion of Hollister retail stores worldwide.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a scenic, sprawling field in Nebraska. Rows of vibrant, genetically modified soybean plants stretch endlessly across the landscape, standing tall and emitting a soft radiant glow as the sunlight filters through their leaves, creating a magical ambiance. Amidst the sea of engineered soybeans, a group of Hollister employees, dressed in their signature beachy attire, joyously frolic in the fields, mistakenly riding the waves of the swaying soybean plants as if immersed in a sprawling surf paradise. The enchanting scene captures the essence of Hollister's unique and carefree spirit, with the allure of the magical soybean fields inspiring a global sensation of surf-inspired experiences. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Symbolism Symbolism Cyberpunk Realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide, in the following situation: Because as soybeans in Nebraska became more 'engineered', they started producing a pheromone that attracts Hollister employees, who mistook the fields for a giant surf paradise. So, in a wave of confusion, they opened more Hollister stores globally to share the 'surfing' experience with the world.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling field in Nebraska, rows of soybean plants stretch across the landscape. The vibrant green plants stand tall, their leaves shimmering in the sunlight. However, these soybeans are not just ordinary; they are genetically modified, emitting a soft radiant glow. As the sunlight filters through the leaves, a faint pheromone drifts into the air, carrying a hint of sweetness. Amidst the sea of engineered soybeans, a group of Hollister employees, clad in their signature beachy attire, can be seen frolicking in the fields. They joyously ride the waves of the swaying soybean plants, mistaking them for a sprawling surf paradise. Meanwhile, around the world, newly opened Hollister stores dot the map, each one eagerly spreading the 'surfing' experience as if inspired by the enchanted fields of Nebraska.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling field in Nebraska, rows of soybean plants stretch across the landscape. The vibrant green plants stand tall, their leaves shimmering in the sunlight. However, these soybeans are not just ordinary; they are genetically modified, emitting a soft radiant glow. As the sunlight filters through the leaves, a faint pheromone drifts into the air, carrying a hint of sweetness. Amidst the sea of engineered soybeans, a group of Hollister employees, clad in their signature beachy attire, can be seen frolicking in the fields. They joyously ride the waves of the swaying soybean plants, mistaking them for a sprawling surf paradise. Meanwhile, around the world, newly opened Hollister stores dot the map, each one eagerly spreading the 'surfing' experience as if inspired by the enchanted fields of Nebraska. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a scenic, sprawling field in Nebraska. Rows of vibrant, genetically modified soybean plants stretch endlessly across the landscape, standing tall and emitting a soft radiant glow as the sunlight filters through their leaves, creating a magical ambiance. Amidst the sea of engineered soybeans, a group of Hollister employees, dressed in their signature beachy attire, joyously frolic in the fields, mistakenly riding the waves of the swaying soybean plants as if immersed in a sprawling surf paradise. The enchanting scene captures the essence of Hollister's unique and carefree spirit, with the allure of the magical soybean fields inspiring a global sensation of surf-inspired experiences.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska caused Hollister retail store count worldwide to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMO Soybean Grow, Hollister Show: Investigating the Rhyme of Time

Journal of Agricultural Rhythms and Rhymes

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Soybean Grow, Hollister Show: Investigating the Rhyme of Time

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we step into the world of GMO soybeans and stylish denim to unravel an unexpected connection between agricultural innovation and retail therapy. Utilizing data from the USDA for GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and Statista for the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out to answer the burning question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? To our surprise, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676, suggesting a rather spikey relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. With a p-value of less than 0.01, it seems like there might be more to this rhyme than meets the eye. Join us as we dig through the soil of statistical analysis to plant the seeds of insight and harvest the fruits of unexpected connections in the world of agricultural innovation and retail trends!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Soybean Grow, Hollister Show: Investigating the Rhyme of Time

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we step into the world of GMO soybeans and stylish denim to unravel an unexpected connection between agricultural innovation and retail therapy. Utilizing data from the USDA for GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and Statista for the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out to answer the burning question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? To our surprise, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676, suggesting a rather spikey relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. With a p-value of less than 0.01, it seems like there might be more to this rhyme than meets the eye. Join us as we dig through the soil of statistical analysis to plant the seeds of insight and harvest the fruits of unexpected connections in the world of agricultural innovation and retail trends!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

As we delve into the world of correlation and causation, we often encounter unexpected relationships that seem to defy all logic and reason – much like finding a pineapple in the produce section of a grocery store! Today, we embark on a whimsical journey through the fields of agricultural innovation and the glamorous world of retail fashion, where genetically modified soybeans and stylish denim collide in a peculiar tango of statistical significance.

Picture this: farmers in Nebraska toiling away in their fields, cultivating genetically modified soybeans with the hopes of improving crop yield and resistance to pests. Simultaneously, fashion enthusiasts across the globe flock to Hollister stores, in search of the latest denim trends and beachy-chic attire. One might ponder, what do these two disparate entities have in common? Are they merely two ships passing in the night, or could there be a deeper, more rooted connection between them?

Armed with data from the USDA on GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and statistics from Statista detailing the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out on a quest to untangle the web of correlations, unveiling a surprising bond between agricultural innovation and retail therapy.

As we embark on this odyssey of data exploration, we aim to shed light on the intriguing question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? Are these seemingly antithetical domains secretly whispering code to each other, like a pair of jeans communicating with a soybean under the cover of darkness?

With a twinkle in our eyes and a sprinkle of statistical fairy dust, we present our findings, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676 – a number that dances tantalizingly close to 1, like two peas in a pod at a hoedown. Our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, beckon us to entertain the notion that there may be more to this congenial relationship than meets the eye.

So, buckle up and join us as we embark on a scientific adventure to navigate the ebb and flow of GMO soybean growth and the worldwide proliferation of Hollister stores. Through rigorous statistical analysis and a touch of whimsy, we aim to unearth the hidden threads that bind these seemingly incongruous entities, illuminating the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of agricultural innovation and retail trends. Prepare for a journey that promises to be as colorful and enigmatic as a tie-dyed lab coat in a field of golden soybeans!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Soybean Grow, Hollister Show: Investigating the Rhyme of Time

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we step into the world of GMO soybeans and stylish denim to unravel an unexpected connection between agricultural innovation and retail therapy. Utilizing data from the USDA for GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and Statista for the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out to answer the burning question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? To our surprise, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676, suggesting a rather spikey relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. With a p-value of less than 0.01, it seems like there might be more to this rhyme than meets the eye. Join us as we dig through the soil of statistical analysis to plant the seeds of insight and harvest the fruits of unexpected connections in the world of agricultural innovation and retail trends!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As we delve into the world of correlation and causation, we often encounter unexpected relationships that seem to defy all logic and reason – much like finding a pineapple in the produce section of a grocery store! Today, we embark on a whimsical journey through the fields of agricultural innovation and the glamorous world of retail fashion, where genetically modified soybeans and stylish denim collide in a peculiar tango of statistical significance.
Picture this: farmers in Nebraska toiling away in their fields, cultivating genetically modified soybeans with the hopes of improving crop yield and resistance to pests. Simultaneously, fashion enthusiasts across the globe flock to Hollister stores, in search of the latest denim trends and beachy-chic attire. One might ponder, what do these two disparate entities have in common? Are they merely two ships passing in the night, or could there be a deeper, more rooted connection between them?
Armed with data from the USDA on GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and statistics from Statista detailing the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out on a quest to untangle the web of correlations, unveiling a surprising bond between agricultural innovation and retail therapy.
As we embark on this odyssey of data exploration, we aim to shed light on the intriguing question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? Are these seemingly antithetical domains secretly whispering code to each other, like a pair of jeans communicating with a soybean under the cover of darkness?
With a twinkle in our eyes and a sprinkle of statistical fairy dust, we present our findings, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676 – a number that dances tantalizingly close to 1, like two peas in a pod at a hoedown. Our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, beckon us to entertain the notion that there may be more to this congenial relationship than meets the eye.
So, buckle up and join us as we embark on a scientific adventure to navigate the ebb and flow of GMO soybean growth and the worldwide proliferation of Hollister stores. Through rigorous statistical analysis and a touch of whimsy, we aim to unearth the hidden threads that bind these seemingly incongruous entities, illuminating the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of agricultural innovation and retail trends. Prepare for a journey that promises to be as colorful and enigmatic as a tie-dyed lab coat in a field of golden soybeans!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature surrounding the relationship between agricultural trends and retail phenomena is as diverse and intricate as a patchwork quilt made from denim and soybean leaves. We begin our review by examining the insightful work of Smith et al. (2018), who explored the socioeconomic impact of GMO soybean cultivation on local communities. Their findings shed light on the complex web of factors influencing the adoption and diffusion of genetically modified crops, offering a comprehensive view of the agricultural landscape.

Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the consumer behavior and preferences in the retail fashion industry, providing valuable insights into the trends and drivers shaping the global market. Their research illustrates the dynamic nature of consumer choices and the ever-evolving realm of fashion, akin to a wardrobe that undergoes seasonal transformations.

Delving deeper into the intersection of agriculture and commerce, "Seeds of Style" by Green Thumb (2017) presents a fascinating exploration of the historical and cultural significance of various crops and their influence on fashion trends. From cotton fields to soybean plantations, the author weaves a compelling narrative that highlights the often-unseen connections between crops and couture.

Turning to fictional works that offer intriguing parallels to our study, "The Jeans Diaries" by Denim Davenport (2005) and "Soybeans and the City" by Bean Belle (2012) offer whimsical tales of adventure and intrigue set against the backdrop of rural farms and bustling urban landscapes. While these novels may not contribute directly to empirical research, they certainly add a touch of literary charm to our exploration of the GMO soybeans and Hollister connection.

In the realm of cinema, movies such as "The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants" and "Field of Dreams" provide a cinematic lens through which to view the potential interplay between agriculture and fashion. As we navigate the fields of statistical analysis and agricultural innovation, these creative works serve as a delightful reminder of the myriad ways in which soybeans and denim can captivate the imagination.

As we embark on this scholarly escapade, let us not lose sight of the whimsy and wonder that underpin our exploration of the relationship between GMO soybean cultivation in Nebraska and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. With a hearty blend of academic rigor and humor, we journey forth to uncover the unexpected connections that bind these seemingly disparate domains, offering a splash of levity to the scholarly pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Soybean Grow, Hollister Show: Investigating the Rhyme of Time

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we step into the world of GMO soybeans and stylish denim to unravel an unexpected connection between agricultural innovation and retail therapy. Utilizing data from the USDA for GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and Statista for the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out to answer the burning question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? To our surprise, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676, suggesting a rather spikey relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. With a p-value of less than 0.01, it seems like there might be more to this rhyme than meets the eye. Join us as we dig through the soil of statistical analysis to plant the seeds of insight and harvest the fruits of unexpected connections in the world of agricultural innovation and retail trends!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As we delve into the world of correlation and causation, we often encounter unexpected relationships that seem to defy all logic and reason – much like finding a pineapple in the produce section of a grocery store! Today, we embark on a whimsical journey through the fields of agricultural innovation and the glamorous world of retail fashion, where genetically modified soybeans and stylish denim collide in a peculiar tango of statistical significance.
Picture this: farmers in Nebraska toiling away in their fields, cultivating genetically modified soybeans with the hopes of improving crop yield and resistance to pests. Simultaneously, fashion enthusiasts across the globe flock to Hollister stores, in search of the latest denim trends and beachy-chic attire. One might ponder, what do these two disparate entities have in common? Are they merely two ships passing in the night, or could there be a deeper, more rooted connection between them?
Armed with data from the USDA on GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and statistics from Statista detailing the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out on a quest to untangle the web of correlations, unveiling a surprising bond between agricultural innovation and retail therapy.
As we embark on this odyssey of data exploration, we aim to shed light on the intriguing question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? Are these seemingly antithetical domains secretly whispering code to each other, like a pair of jeans communicating with a soybean under the cover of darkness?
With a twinkle in our eyes and a sprinkle of statistical fairy dust, we present our findings, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676 – a number that dances tantalizingly close to 1, like two peas in a pod at a hoedown. Our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, beckon us to entertain the notion that there may be more to this congenial relationship than meets the eye.
So, buckle up and join us as we embark on a scientific adventure to navigate the ebb and flow of GMO soybean growth and the worldwide proliferation of Hollister stores. Through rigorous statistical analysis and a touch of whimsy, we aim to unearth the hidden threads that bind these seemingly incongruous entities, illuminating the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of agricultural innovation and retail trends. Prepare for a journey that promises to be as colorful and enigmatic as a tie-dyed lab coat in a field of golden soybeans!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
Our research team embarked on a digital expedition through the virtual landscapes of the USDA and Statista, armed with nothing but a trusty internet connection and an insatiable curiosity for quirky correlations. We scoured the depths of these online repositories, sifting through years of data like intrepid detectives on the trail of an elusive culprit. Gathering information from 2000 to 2022, we navigated through the virtual haystack to find the GM needles in the soybean stacks and the retail gems amidst the sea of Hollister stores.

GMO Soybean Adoption in Nebraska:
The USDA provided us with a treasure trove of information on the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in Nebraska, allowing us to chart the growth and spread of these bioengineered legumes over the years. We meticulously examined the acres of soybean fields embracing GMO technology, crunching numbers and analyzing trends with a fervor akin to a soybean's enthusiasm for photosynthesis.

Worldwide Count of Hollister Retail Stores:
Turning our gaze to the fashion-forward realm, Statista unfurled its digital tapestry, revealing the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores. Like intrepid fashionistas tracing the global footprint of denim dreams, we meticulously tallied the number of Hollister stores across borders, continents, and hemispheres, uncovering the intriguing patterns in the expansion of this denim empire.

Correlation Analysis:
Armed with our dual datasets, we wielded the formidable tools of correlation analysis to unearth the elusive link between GMO soybeans in Nebraska and the number of Hollister stores around the world. Like intrepid matchmakers of the statistical world, we sought to unveil the hidden courtship between agricultural innovation and retail enchantment.

Statistical Wizardry:
Our research journey led us to the hallowed halls of statistical wizardry, where we performed complex calculations, wielded regression analyses like wands, and summoned the spirits of p-values to discern the significance of our findings. With a touch of statistical alchemy and a hint of whimsy, we weaved the intricate tapestry of our research, unraveling the mysterious dance of data that waltzed between GMO soybeans and Hollister stores.

Intergalactic Interpolation (Just Kidding):
While we joke about intergalactic interpolation, we assure you that our methods adhered to the rigorous standards of scientific inquiry. Through the seemingly mundane act of data collection and analysis, we embarked on a cosmic odyssey of statistical exploration, aiming to shed light on the seemingly uncanny alignment of GMO soybean growth and the burgeoning presence of Hollister stores.

In summary, our methodology relied on the fusion of data collection prowess, statistical acumen, and a dash of whimsy, all harmonizing in a quirky symphony of research that sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between GMO soybeans in Nebraska and the global proliferation of Hollister stores.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9183676, r-squared of 0.8433991, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Soybean Grow, Hollister Show: Investigating the Rhyme of Time

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we step into the world of GMO soybeans and stylish denim to unravel an unexpected connection between agricultural innovation and retail therapy. Utilizing data from the USDA for GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and Statista for the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out to answer the burning question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? To our surprise, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676, suggesting a rather spikey relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. With a p-value of less than 0.01, it seems like there might be more to this rhyme than meets the eye. Join us as we dig through the soil of statistical analysis to plant the seeds of insight and harvest the fruits of unexpected connections in the world of agricultural innovation and retail trends!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
As we delve into the world of correlation and causation, we often encounter unexpected relationships that seem to defy all logic and reason – much like finding a pineapple in the produce section of a grocery store! Today, we embark on a whimsical journey through the fields of agricultural innovation and the glamorous world of retail fashion, where genetically modified soybeans and stylish denim collide in a peculiar tango of statistical significance.
Picture this: farmers in Nebraska toiling away in their fields, cultivating genetically modified soybeans with the hopes of improving crop yield and resistance to pests. Simultaneously, fashion enthusiasts across the globe flock to Hollister stores, in search of the latest denim trends and beachy-chic attire. One might ponder, what do these two disparate entities have in common? Are they merely two ships passing in the night, or could there be a deeper, more rooted connection between them?
Armed with data from the USDA on GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and statistics from Statista detailing the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out on a quest to untangle the web of correlations, unveiling a surprising bond between agricultural innovation and retail therapy.
As we embark on this odyssey of data exploration, we aim to shed light on the intriguing question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? Are these seemingly antithetical domains secretly whispering code to each other, like a pair of jeans communicating with a soybean under the cover of darkness?
With a twinkle in our eyes and a sprinkle of statistical fairy dust, we present our findings, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676 – a number that dances tantalizingly close to 1, like two peas in a pod at a hoedown. Our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, beckon us to entertain the notion that there may be more to this congenial relationship than meets the eye.
So, buckle up and join us as we embark on a scientific adventure to navigate the ebb and flow of GMO soybean growth and the worldwide proliferation of Hollister stores. Through rigorous statistical analysis and a touch of whimsy, we aim to unearth the hidden threads that bind these seemingly incongruous entities, illuminating the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of agricultural innovation and retail trends. Prepare for a journey that promises to be as colorful and enigmatic as a tie-dyed lab coat in a field of golden soybeans!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores yielded some unexpectedly intriguing results – the kind that make you do a double take and then scratch your head in bemusement. After crunching the numbers and sifting through data from the USDA and Statista, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676. In the world of statistics, this figure is akin to discovering a four-leaf clover in a field of soybeans – rare and a cause for celebration!

The r-squared value of 0.8433991 further solidified the robustness of the relationship between these two variables, as it demonstrated that a substantial portion of the variation in the count of Hollister stores worldwide could be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans in Nebraska. It's like finding a pair of perfectly fitting jeans on sale – a rare and satisfying occurrence.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stood strong against the winds of statistical skepticism, suggesting that the correlation observed was not a mere fluke, but a meaningful connection worthy of further exploration. It's like discovering a treasure chest buried beneath a soybean field – a delightful and unexpected surprise!

In Fig. 1, our scatterplot showcases the striking relationship between GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and the worldwide count of Hollister stores. The data points are aligned in a manner that’s reminiscent of a field of perfectly planted soybeans, with each point representing a Hollister store serving as a stylish scarecrow amidst the agricultural landscape.

Our results not only point to a compelling association between GMO soybean adoption and the global presence of Hollister retail stores but also invite us to consider the possibility of hidden dynamics at play. Could it be that the roots of GMO soybeans extend beyond the soil, nudging the growth of Hollister stores in distant corners of the globe? Such musings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated spheres, much like discovering that your favorite pair of jeans and a soybean share a common thread. With the strength of our findings, it seems that this peculiar rhyme of time is not just a statistical anomaly, but a genuine phenomenon deserving of further investigation.

Our analysis not only uncovers a remarkable connection between agricultural innovation and retail trends but also opens the door to a world of whimsy and wonder, inviting us to explore the unexpected tapestry of associations that shape our world. In the spirit of scientific curiosity and a touch of levity, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic melody that binds GMO soybeans and Hollister stores, a journey that promises to be as engaging and unpredictable as stumbling upon a pair of denim-clad scarecrows in a soybean field!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
GMO Soybean Grow, Hollister Show: Investigating the Rhyme of Time

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we step into the world of GMO soybeans and stylish denim to unravel an unexpected connection between agricultural innovation and retail therapy. Utilizing data from the USDA for GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and Statista for the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out to answer the burning question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? To our surprise, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676, suggesting a rather spikey relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. With a p-value of less than 0.01, it seems like there might be more to this rhyme than meets the eye. Join us as we dig through the soil of statistical analysis to plant the seeds of insight and harvest the fruits of unexpected connections in the world of agricultural innovation and retail trends!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature surrounding the relationship between agricultural trends and retail phenomena is as diverse and intricate as a patchwork quilt made from denim and soybean leaves. We begin our review by examining the insightful work of Smith et al. (2018), who explored the socioeconomic impact of GMO soybean cultivation on local communities. Their findings shed light on the complex web of factors influencing the adoption and diffusion of genetically modified crops, offering a comprehensive view of the agricultural landscape.
Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the consumer behavior and preferences in the retail fashion industry, providing valuable insights into the trends and drivers shaping the global market. Their research illustrates the dynamic nature of consumer choices and the ever-evolving realm of fashion, akin to a wardrobe that undergoes seasonal transformations.
Delving deeper into the intersection of agriculture and commerce, "Seeds of Style" by Green Thumb (2017) presents a fascinating exploration of the historical and cultural significance of various crops and their influence on fashion trends. From cotton fields to soybean plantations, the author weaves a compelling narrative that highlights the often-unseen connections between crops and couture.
Turning to fictional works that offer intriguing parallels to our study, "The Jeans Diaries" by Denim Davenport (2005) and "Soybeans and the City" by Bean Belle (2012) offer whimsical tales of adventure and intrigue set against the backdrop of rural farms and bustling urban landscapes. While these novels may not contribute directly to empirical research, they certainly add a touch of literary charm to our exploration of the GMO soybeans and Hollister connection.
In the realm of cinema, movies such as "The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants" and "Field of Dreams" provide a cinematic lens through which to view the potential interplay between agriculture and fashion. As we navigate the fields of statistical analysis and agricultural innovation, these creative works serve as a delightful reminder of the myriad ways in which soybeans and denim can captivate the imagination.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, let us not lose sight of the whimsy and wonder that underpin our exploration of the relationship between GMO soybean cultivation in Nebraska and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. With a hearty blend of academic rigor and humor, we journey forth to uncover the unexpected connections that bind these seemingly disparate domains, offering a splash of levity to the scholarly pursuit of knowledge.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores yielded some unexpectedly intriguing results – the kind that make you do a double take and then scratch your head in bemusement. After crunching the numbers and sifting through data from the USDA and Statista, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676. In the world of statistics, this figure is akin to discovering a four-leaf clover in a field of soybeans – rare and a cause for celebration!
The r-squared value of 0.8433991 further solidified the robustness of the relationship between these two variables, as it demonstrated that a substantial portion of the variation in the count of Hollister stores worldwide could be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans in Nebraska. It's like finding a pair of perfectly fitting jeans on sale – a rare and satisfying occurrence.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stood strong against the winds of statistical skepticism, suggesting that the correlation observed was not a mere fluke, but a meaningful connection worthy of further exploration. It's like discovering a treasure chest buried beneath a soybean field – a delightful and unexpected surprise!
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot showcases the striking relationship between GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and the worldwide count of Hollister stores. The data points are aligned in a manner that’s reminiscent of a field of perfectly planted soybeans, with each point representing a Hollister store serving as a stylish scarecrow amidst the agricultural landscape.
Our results not only point to a compelling association between GMO soybean adoption and the global presence of Hollister retail stores but also invite us to consider the possibility of hidden dynamics at play. Could it be that the roots of GMO soybeans extend beyond the soil, nudging the growth of Hollister stores in distant corners of the globe? Such musings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated spheres, much like discovering that your favorite pair of jeans and a soybean share a common thread. With the strength of our findings, it seems that this peculiar rhyme of time is not just a statistical anomaly, but a genuine phenomenon deserving of further investigation.
Our analysis not only uncovers a remarkable connection between agricultural innovation and retail trends but also opens the door to a world of whimsy and wonder, inviting us to explore the unexpected tapestry of associations that shape our world. In the spirit of scientific curiosity and a touch of levity, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic melody that binds GMO soybeans and Hollister stores, a journey that promises to be as engaging and unpredictable as stumbling upon a pair of denim-clad scarecrows in a soybean field!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

As we venture into the discussion of our unexpected exploration into the relationship between GMO soybean cultivation in Nebraska and the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, it's time to sow the seeds of thoughtful reflection and sprinkle in a dash of whimsical pondering. Our findings have not only surprised us, but also raised eyebrows in the agricultural and retail arenas, setting the stage for a fertile discussion that promises to be as captivating as a fashion show in a soybean field.

First and foremost, our results supported the prior research outlining the socioeconomic impact of GMO soybean cultivation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9183676 certainly echoes the intricate web of factors influencing the adoption and diffusion of genetically modified crops, as noted by Smith et al. (2018). It's like finding the perfect pair of statistical jeans – a snug fit that reaffirms the influence of agricultural innovation on local communities.

Additionally, our exploration of the consumer behavior and preferences in the retail fashion industry, as highlighted by Doe and Jones (2019), finds validation in our findings. The robust correlation observed between the count of Hollister stores and the adoption of GMO soybeans in Nebraska reinforces the dynamic nature of consumer choices and the evolving realm of fashion, much like a wardrobe that undergoes seasonal transformations. Our results tantalizingly suggest that the threads of consumer preferences might be interwoven with the roots of genetically modified soybeans, creating a fabric of influence that stretches from rural farmlands to urban retail hubs.

In the midst of these serious discussions, it's essential to acknowledge the playful parallels drawn from fictional works and cinematic portrayals of agriculture and fashion. While these references may seem lighthearted, they serve as amusing reminders of the richness and whimsy that intertwine with our pursuit of empirical research. It's as if we've stumbled upon a rare gem in our statistical field, reminding us that the exploration of unexpected connections can be both academically rigorous and delightfully fun.

Moving beyond the scholarly terrain, our findings have unraveled a tapestry of associations that not only strengthen the understanding of agricultural trends and retail phenomena but also infuse our exploration with a harmonious blend of curiosity and humor. Much like the delightful discovery of a hidden treasure beneath a soybean field, our research invites further investigation into the peculiar rhyme of time that binds GMO soybeans and Hollister stores. With a touch of levity and a generous sprinkle of scientific zest, our scholarly escapade welcomes all to join in the unraveling of this unlikely melody, promising an engaging and unpredictable journey that defies the traditional confines of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
GMO Soybean Grow, Hollister Show: Investigating the Rhyme of Time

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we step into the world of GMO soybeans and stylish denim to unravel an unexpected connection between agricultural innovation and retail therapy. Utilizing data from the USDA for GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and Statista for the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out to answer the burning question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? To our surprise, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676, suggesting a rather spikey relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. With a p-value of less than 0.01, it seems like there might be more to this rhyme than meets the eye. Join us as we dig through the soil of statistical analysis to plant the seeds of insight and harvest the fruits of unexpected connections in the world of agricultural innovation and retail trends!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As we delve into the world of correlation and causation, we often encounter unexpected relationships that seem to defy all logic and reason – much like finding a pineapple in the produce section of a grocery store! Today, we embark on a whimsical journey through the fields of agricultural innovation and the glamorous world of retail fashion, where genetically modified soybeans and stylish denim collide in a peculiar tango of statistical significance.
Picture this: farmers in Nebraska toiling away in their fields, cultivating genetically modified soybeans with the hopes of improving crop yield and resistance to pests. Simultaneously, fashion enthusiasts across the globe flock to Hollister stores, in search of the latest denim trends and beachy-chic attire. One might ponder, what do these two disparate entities have in common? Are they merely two ships passing in the night, or could there be a deeper, more rooted connection between them?
Armed with data from the USDA on GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and statistics from Statista detailing the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out on a quest to untangle the web of correlations, unveiling a surprising bond between agricultural innovation and retail therapy.
As we embark on this odyssey of data exploration, we aim to shed light on the intriguing question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? Are these seemingly antithetical domains secretly whispering code to each other, like a pair of jeans communicating with a soybean under the cover of darkness?
With a twinkle in our eyes and a sprinkle of statistical fairy dust, we present our findings, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676 – a number that dances tantalizingly close to 1, like two peas in a pod at a hoedown. Our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, beckon us to entertain the notion that there may be more to this congenial relationship than meets the eye.
So, buckle up and join us as we embark on a scientific adventure to navigate the ebb and flow of GMO soybean growth and the worldwide proliferation of Hollister stores. Through rigorous statistical analysis and a touch of whimsy, we aim to unearth the hidden threads that bind these seemingly incongruous entities, illuminating the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of agricultural innovation and retail trends. Prepare for a journey that promises to be as colorful and enigmatic as a tie-dyed lab coat in a field of golden soybeans!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores yielded some unexpectedly intriguing results – the kind that make you do a double take and then scratch your head in bemusement. After crunching the numbers and sifting through data from the USDA and Statista, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676. In the world of statistics, this figure is akin to discovering a four-leaf clover in a field of soybeans – rare and a cause for celebration!
The r-squared value of 0.8433991 further solidified the robustness of the relationship between these two variables, as it demonstrated that a substantial portion of the variation in the count of Hollister stores worldwide could be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans in Nebraska. It's like finding a pair of perfectly fitting jeans on sale – a rare and satisfying occurrence.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stood strong against the winds of statistical skepticism, suggesting that the correlation observed was not a mere fluke, but a meaningful connection worthy of further exploration. It's like discovering a treasure chest buried beneath a soybean field – a delightful and unexpected surprise!
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot showcases the striking relationship between GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and the worldwide count of Hollister stores. The data points are aligned in a manner that’s reminiscent of a field of perfectly planted soybeans, with each point representing a Hollister store serving as a stylish scarecrow amidst the agricultural landscape.
Our results not only point to a compelling association between GMO soybean adoption and the global presence of Hollister retail stores but also invite us to consider the possibility of hidden dynamics at play. Could it be that the roots of GMO soybeans extend beyond the soil, nudging the growth of Hollister stores in distant corners of the globe? Such musings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated spheres, much like discovering that your favorite pair of jeans and a soybean share a common thread. With the strength of our findings, it seems that this peculiar rhyme of time is not just a statistical anomaly, but a genuine phenomenon deserving of further investigation.
Our analysis not only uncovers a remarkable connection between agricultural innovation and retail trends but also opens the door to a world of whimsy and wonder, inviting us to explore the unexpected tapestry of associations that shape our world. In the spirit of scientific curiosity and a touch of levity, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic melody that binds GMO soybeans and Hollister stores, a journey that promises to be as engaging and unpredictable as stumbling upon a pair of denim-clad scarecrows in a soybean field!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

As we conclude our scientific escapade through the peculiar tango of GMO soybeans and Hollister stores, we find ourselves marveling at the unexpected connections that have sprouted from our rigorous analysis. Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676, have left us pondering the sheer splice of fate that seems to entwine these seemingly disparate entities. Much like the unexpected delight of finding a perfectly ripe avocado at the grocery store, our results have injected a dose of whimsy into the world of statistical analysis.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, it appears that the serendipitous connection between GMO soybeans in Nebraska and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores is not a statistical fluke, but rather a genuine phenomenon worthy of further contemplation. It's almost as surprising as stumbling upon a fashionable scarecrow amidst a field of soybeans, isn't it?

The robustness of the relationship, exemplified by an r-squared value of 0.8433991, underscores the substantial portion of the variation in the count of Hollister stores worldwide that can be illuminated by the adoption of GMO soybeans in Nebraska. It's like stumbling upon a stylish pair of jeans that somehow magically fit every individual perfectly – a statistical rarity indeed!

In light of our revelatory findings, it might be tempting to dive deeper into this enchanting association, to unravel the intricate stitches that bind agricultural innovation and retail trends. However, with a mischievous glint in our eyes and a sprinkle of statistical fairy dust, we declare that no further research is needed in this peculiar realm of rhyming rhythms and unlikely relationships. Let this quirky saga of GMO soybeans and Hollister stores remain a whimsical enigma, a statistical anomaly that brings a wry grin of amusement to our faces. After all, sometimes in the world of research, it's okay to embrace the inexplicable and revel in the delightful absurdity of unexpected correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMO Soybean Grow, Hollister Show: Investigating the Rhyme of Time. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agricultural Rhythms and Rhymes


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMO Soybean Grow, Hollister Show: Investigating the Rhyme of Time. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Agricultural Advancements and Amusements


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMO Soybean Grow, Hollister Show: Investigating the Rhyme of Time with an abstract of In this paper, we step into the world of GMO soybeans and stylish denim to unravel an unexpected connection between agricultural innovation and retail therapy. Utilizing data from the USDA for GMO soybean adoption in Nebraska and Statista for the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores, we set out to answer the burning question: could there be a rhyme or reason to the number of Hollister stores and the spread of GMO soybeans? To our surprise, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9183676, suggesting a rather spikey relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. With a p-value of less than 0.01, it seems like there might be more to this rhyme than meets the eye. Join us as we dig through the soil of statistical analysis to plant the seeds of insight and harvest the fruits of unexpected connections in the world of agricultural innovation and retail trends!

ChatGPT:

GMO soybeans, agricultural innovation, retail therapy, Nebraska, USDA data, Hollister retail stores, correlation coefficient, p-value, statistical analysis, unexpected connections, agricultural trends, GMO soybean adoption, denim retail industry

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Nebraska that are genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska

Hollister retail store count worldwide
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Hollister retail store count worldwide

Correlation r = 0.9183676 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8433991 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hollister retail store count worldwide) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.5E-10. 0.0000000006524415061049866000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 6.5E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,532,704,450 random variables You don't actually need 1 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska (GMO soybeans %)7276858692919096979694979596959596949695969696
Hollister retail store count worldwide (Store count)53288167249309383447510525540571589587568553543538542546497505529




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([72,76,85,86,92,91,90,96,97,96,94,97,95,96,95,95,96,94,96,95,96,96,96,])
array_2 = np.array([5,32,88,167,249,309,383,447,510,525,540,571,589,587,568,553,543,538,542,546,497,505,529,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Nebraska"
array_2_name = "Hollister retail store count worldwide"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 3578 · Black Variable ID: 822 · Red Variable ID: 176
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0