about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,541 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Super Bowl point difference and the second variable is Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fans were so blown away by the lopsided victories that they wanted to experience their own sky-high thrills with Malaysia Airlines. It was like the teams' success was just taking off, and so were the search queries!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Title: Super Bowl Shockwave Generate an image showing a dynamic scene of a football stadium with a larger-than-life scoreboard, displaying the widening point difference between the two teams. Beneath the scoreboard, visualize a bar chart representing the surge in Google searches for "Malaysia Airlines" following the game's progression. The bar chart should sharply ascend, indicating the synchronized increase in online searches. The overall image should have a lively and vivid energy, capturing the intensity of the Super Bowl and its impact on digital activity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Super Bowl point difference and Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal A Discovery magazine cover image Symbolism Psychedelic A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Super Bowl point difference and Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines', in the following situation: As the point difference in the Super Bowl increased, so did Google searches for Malaysia Airlines. It appears that as the game got more lopsided, people were desperately searching for something to *plane* their mood, and what better way to do that than to search for a *flying* good deal on airfare!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: As the Super Bowl point difference widened, the bar chart for Google searches for "Malaysia Airlines" also soared upwards, reflecting a sharp increase in online searches. The scene also shows an exaggerated football game scoreboard with a rapidly growing point gap between the two teams.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: As the Super Bowl point difference widened, the bar chart for Google searches for "Malaysia Airlines" also soared upwards, reflecting a sharp increase in online searches. The scene also shows an exaggerated football game scoreboard with a rapidly growing point gap between the two teams. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Title: Super Bowl Shockwave Generate an image showing a dynamic scene of a football stadium with a larger-than-life scoreboard, displaying the widening point difference between the two teams. Beneath the scoreboard, visualize a bar chart representing the surge in Google searches for "Malaysia Airlines" following the game's progression. The bar chart should sharply ascend, indicating the synchronized increase in online searches. The overall image should have a lively and vivid energy, capturing the intensity of the Super Bowl and its impact on digital activity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Super Bowl point difference positively influenced Malaysia Airlines (Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'). Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Super Bowl Blowouts and Mysterious Vanishing Acts: A Statistical Analysis of the Connection Between Point Spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' Searches

The Journal of Eccentric Statistical Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Super Bowl point difference and Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Super Bowl Blowouts and Mysterious Vanishing Acts: A Statistical Analysis of the Connection Between Point Spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive deep into the correlation between the point difference in Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. While the topic may seem as unrelated as a pineapple on a pizza, our statistical analysis has unveiled some surprising connections. Using data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning from 2008 to 2022, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01. To put it simply, there appears to be a rather strong relationship between blowout wins in the Super Bowl and spikes in searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'. Who would have thought that football and airline mysteries could go hand in hand? This paper aims to shed light on this curious phenomenon and perhaps uncover a touchdown of insights amidst the puzzling turbulence of internet search behavior. Football fan or not, this research is sure to score a chuckle or two while raising eyebrow-raising questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate cultural phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Super Bowl point difference and Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Super Bowl Blowouts and Mysterious Vanishing Acts: A Statistical Analysis of the Connection Between Point Spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive deep into the correlation between the point difference in Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. While the topic may seem as unrelated as a pineapple on a pizza, our statistical analysis has unveiled some surprising connections. Using data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning from 2008 to 2022, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01. To put it simply, there appears to be a rather strong relationship between blowout wins in the Super Bowl and spikes in searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'. Who would have thought that football and airline mysteries could go hand in hand? This paper aims to shed light on this curious phenomenon and perhaps uncover a touchdown of insights amidst the puzzling turbulence of internet search behavior. Football fan or not, this research is sure to score a chuckle or two while raising eyebrow-raising questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate cultural phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world is full of mysteries. From the enigma of the Bermuda Triangle to the age-old question of why we press the elevator button multiple times when we know it won't make it arrive any faster, there are just certain things that leave us scratching our heads. However, none seem to be as perplexing as the unlikely connection we stumbled upon between seemingly unrelated events: the point spreads of Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'.

At first glance, one might picture an awkward mash-up of football fans frantically googling airplane accident news on Super Bowl Sunday, or perhaps a conspiracy theory involving mysteriously diverted touchdowns. But fear not, dear readers, for our research takes a more statistically grounded approach to unraveling this curious conundrum.

The premise was simple: could the magnitude of a Super Bowl blowout have any bearing on the number of times people are drawn to their screens to inquire about a certain airline based in Southeast Asia? As unlikely as it may sound, our analysis revealed a rather eyebrow-raising correlation of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate subjects.

Now, before you dismiss this revelation as a mere statistical hiccup, let's pause to consider the implications. Could it be that the excitement of football victory sends people flocking to the internet in search of exotic travel destinations? Or perhaps the adrenaline rush from an epic game prompts a spike in interest for global news?

As we embark on this journey to demystify the inexplicable bond between Super Bowl point spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' searches, let us keep an open mind and a healthy dose of skepticism, just like the person who first decided to eat an artichoke.

In the pages that follow, we will delve deeper into the data, explore potential mechanisms at play, and attempt to shed light on this peculiar pattern. So, buckle up and get ready for an adventure that blends the thrill of the gridiron with the mystery of vanished flights. After all, who knows what unexpected twists and turns await us in this unlikely intersection of sports and aviation?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Super Bowl point difference and Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Super Bowl Blowouts and Mysterious Vanishing Acts: A Statistical Analysis of the Connection Between Point Spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive deep into the correlation between the point difference in Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. While the topic may seem as unrelated as a pineapple on a pizza, our statistical analysis has unveiled some surprising connections. Using data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning from 2008 to 2022, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01. To put it simply, there appears to be a rather strong relationship between blowout wins in the Super Bowl and spikes in searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'. Who would have thought that football and airline mysteries could go hand in hand? This paper aims to shed light on this curious phenomenon and perhaps uncover a touchdown of insights amidst the puzzling turbulence of internet search behavior. Football fan or not, this research is sure to score a chuckle or two while raising eyebrow-raising questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate cultural phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world is full of mysteries. From the enigma of the Bermuda Triangle to the age-old question of why we press the elevator button multiple times when we know it won't make it arrive any faster, there are just certain things that leave us scratching our heads. However, none seem to be as perplexing as the unlikely connection we stumbled upon between seemingly unrelated events: the point spreads of Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'.
At first glance, one might picture an awkward mash-up of football fans frantically googling airplane accident news on Super Bowl Sunday, or perhaps a conspiracy theory involving mysteriously diverted touchdowns. But fear not, dear readers, for our research takes a more statistically grounded approach to unraveling this curious conundrum.
The premise was simple: could the magnitude of a Super Bowl blowout have any bearing on the number of times people are drawn to their screens to inquire about a certain airline based in Southeast Asia? As unlikely as it may sound, our analysis revealed a rather eyebrow-raising correlation of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate subjects.
Now, before you dismiss this revelation as a mere statistical hiccup, let's pause to consider the implications. Could it be that the excitement of football victory sends people flocking to the internet in search of exotic travel destinations? Or perhaps the adrenaline rush from an epic game prompts a spike in interest for global news?
As we embark on this journey to demystify the inexplicable bond between Super Bowl point spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' searches, let us keep an open mind and a healthy dose of skepticism, just like the person who first decided to eat an artichoke.
In the pages that follow, we will delve deeper into the data, explore potential mechanisms at play, and attempt to shed light on this peculiar pattern. So, buckle up and get ready for an adventure that blends the thrill of the gridiron with the mystery of vanished flights. After all, who knows what unexpected twists and turns await us in this unlikely intersection of sports and aviation?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith et al. (2015) examined the relationship between sports outcomes and internet search behavior, focusing on the connection between Super Bowl point differentials and online queries related to travel and airlines. The authors find a moderate positive association between the magnitude of a team's win and the subsequent spike in searches for travel-related topics. However, what truly sets our research apart is the specific focus on searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'.

Doe and Jones (2017) conducted a comprehensive analysis of online search patterns following major sports events, and while their study primarily emphasized the impact of game outcomes on merchandise sales, they did observe a notable uptick in internet searches for international travel destinations. Unbeknownst to them, this data laid the groundwork for our exploration into the unexpected curiosity of 'Malaysia Airlines' searches in the aftermath of Super Bowl blowouts.

Moving beyond scholarly articles, popular non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner and "Outliers: The Story of Success" by Malcolm Gladwell have delved into the realm of seemingly unrelated phenomena and unearthed surprising linkages, inspiring us to apply a similar line of thinking to the unlikely pairing of sports and airline intrigue.

In the world of fiction, the works of Haruki Murakami, particularly "Kafka on the Shore," offer a surreal exploration of mysterious disappearances and unexplainable connections, mirroring the enigmatic ties we seek to unravel between football victories and online searches pertaining to a specific airline.

Now, as we venture into the realm of unexpected references, let's not forget the animated realm. The cartoon series "Scooby-Doo" and the childhood classic "Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego?" may have sparked our fascination with uncovering hidden connections and solving perplexing riddles, setting the stage for the unanticipated correlation we aim to navigate in this research.

With this blend of academic rigor, real-world inspiration, and a touch of whimsy, we aim to cast light on a phenomenon as unexpected as finding a rubber chicken at a football game –the baffling link between Super Bowl point spreads and the enigmatic allure of 'Malaysia Airlines' searches.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Super Bowl point difference and Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Super Bowl Blowouts and Mysterious Vanishing Acts: A Statistical Analysis of the Connection Between Point Spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive deep into the correlation between the point difference in Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. While the topic may seem as unrelated as a pineapple on a pizza, our statistical analysis has unveiled some surprising connections. Using data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning from 2008 to 2022, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01. To put it simply, there appears to be a rather strong relationship between blowout wins in the Super Bowl and spikes in searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'. Who would have thought that football and airline mysteries could go hand in hand? This paper aims to shed light on this curious phenomenon and perhaps uncover a touchdown of insights amidst the puzzling turbulence of internet search behavior. Football fan or not, this research is sure to score a chuckle or two while raising eyebrow-raising questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate cultural phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world is full of mysteries. From the enigma of the Bermuda Triangle to the age-old question of why we press the elevator button multiple times when we know it won't make it arrive any faster, there are just certain things that leave us scratching our heads. However, none seem to be as perplexing as the unlikely connection we stumbled upon between seemingly unrelated events: the point spreads of Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'.
At first glance, one might picture an awkward mash-up of football fans frantically googling airplane accident news on Super Bowl Sunday, or perhaps a conspiracy theory involving mysteriously diverted touchdowns. But fear not, dear readers, for our research takes a more statistically grounded approach to unraveling this curious conundrum.
The premise was simple: could the magnitude of a Super Bowl blowout have any bearing on the number of times people are drawn to their screens to inquire about a certain airline based in Southeast Asia? As unlikely as it may sound, our analysis revealed a rather eyebrow-raising correlation of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate subjects.
Now, before you dismiss this revelation as a mere statistical hiccup, let's pause to consider the implications. Could it be that the excitement of football victory sends people flocking to the internet in search of exotic travel destinations? Or perhaps the adrenaline rush from an epic game prompts a spike in interest for global news?
As we embark on this journey to demystify the inexplicable bond between Super Bowl point spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' searches, let us keep an open mind and a healthy dose of skepticism, just like the person who first decided to eat an artichoke.
In the pages that follow, we will delve deeper into the data, explore potential mechanisms at play, and attempt to shed light on this peculiar pattern. So, buckle up and get ready for an adventure that blends the thrill of the gridiron with the mystery of vanished flights. After all, who knows what unexpected twists and turns await us in this unlikely intersection of sports and aviation?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the enigmatic relationship between Super Bowl point differences and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines', we embarked on a data analysis journey that was as unpredictable as a fumbled football. Our methodology fused statistical rigor with digital sleuthing, akin to a detective donning a quarterback's helmet – a peculiar sight indeed.

First, we scoured the vast expanse of the internet, from the soaring peaks of Wikipedia to the ever-undulating landscape of Google Trends. We combed through data spanning from 2008 to 2022, casting our nets wide and far to capture the nuances and eccentricities of online search behavior.

In the realm of statistical analysis, we harnessed the power of correlation coefficients and p-values to decode the mysterious dance between Super Bowl blowouts and 'Malaysia Airlines' searches. Our tools were as finely tuned as a precision-engineered touchdown pass, ensuring that our findings could weather the scrutiny of peer review like a well-gripped pigskin on a rainy day.

Now, let's admit it – this research path was as unconventional as a left-handed punter. As we waded through the data, redirecting our attention from football stats to airline inquiries, we encountered some delightful surprises and perplexing curiosities. Picture a referee suddenly breaking into a tap dance routine on the field – that's the level of unexpected twists we confronted in our quest for truth and statistical significance.

Perhaps the most complex aspect of our methodology was navigating the uncharted territory of bridging Super Bowl fanaticism with aviation intrigue. You could say it was like attempting to execute a flea-flicker play in a boardroom meeting – a tad unorthodox, but exhilarating all the same.

In the end, though, our methodology was founded on the principles of thoroughness, attention to detail, and a healthy sense of humor. We aimed to unravel the mystery with the seriousness of an epidemiologist tracking a rare disease outbreak while maintaining the spirit of curiosity and adventure akin to explorers embarking on a quest for long-lost treasure.

So, with our compasses aligned and our statistical binoculars polished, we set off into the uncharted territories of internet search behavior and sports superstitions, ready to uncover the unexpected connections that lurk amidst the data-driven fog.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Super Bowl point difference and Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2008 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7055490, r-squared of 0.4977993, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Super Bowl Blowouts and Mysterious Vanishing Acts: A Statistical Analysis of the Connection Between Point Spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive deep into the correlation between the point difference in Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. While the topic may seem as unrelated as a pineapple on a pizza, our statistical analysis has unveiled some surprising connections. Using data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning from 2008 to 2022, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01. To put it simply, there appears to be a rather strong relationship between blowout wins in the Super Bowl and spikes in searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'. Who would have thought that football and airline mysteries could go hand in hand? This paper aims to shed light on this curious phenomenon and perhaps uncover a touchdown of insights amidst the puzzling turbulence of internet search behavior. Football fan or not, this research is sure to score a chuckle or two while raising eyebrow-raising questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate cultural phenomena.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world is full of mysteries. From the enigma of the Bermuda Triangle to the age-old question of why we press the elevator button multiple times when we know it won't make it arrive any faster, there are just certain things that leave us scratching our heads. However, none seem to be as perplexing as the unlikely connection we stumbled upon between seemingly unrelated events: the point spreads of Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'.
At first glance, one might picture an awkward mash-up of football fans frantically googling airplane accident news on Super Bowl Sunday, or perhaps a conspiracy theory involving mysteriously diverted touchdowns. But fear not, dear readers, for our research takes a more statistically grounded approach to unraveling this curious conundrum.
The premise was simple: could the magnitude of a Super Bowl blowout have any bearing on the number of times people are drawn to their screens to inquire about a certain airline based in Southeast Asia? As unlikely as it may sound, our analysis revealed a rather eyebrow-raising correlation of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate subjects.
Now, before you dismiss this revelation as a mere statistical hiccup, let's pause to consider the implications. Could it be that the excitement of football victory sends people flocking to the internet in search of exotic travel destinations? Or perhaps the adrenaline rush from an epic game prompts a spike in interest for global news?
As we embark on this journey to demystify the inexplicable bond between Super Bowl point spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' searches, let us keep an open mind and a healthy dose of skepticism, just like the person who first decided to eat an artichoke.
In the pages that follow, we will delve deeper into the data, explore potential mechanisms at play, and attempt to shed light on this peculiar pattern. So, buckle up and get ready for an adventure that blends the thrill of the gridiron with the mystery of vanished flights. After all, who knows what unexpected twists and turns await us in this unlikely intersection of sports and aviation?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a surprising correlation of 0.7055490, with an r-squared of 0.4977993 and a p-value less than 0.01, between the point difference in Super Bowl games and the number of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot unmistakably showcases the strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. While the figure itself may not win any beauty contests, its significance in elucidating this enigmatic connection cannot be overstated.

The statistical evidence suggests that as the point spread of Super Bowl games widens, there is a discernible increase in searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'. It's almost as if the more lopsided the game, the more people are driven to seek solace in the mysteries of air travel. Whether it's the thrill of victory sparking an interest in international travel or the agony of defeat prompting a search for alternative modes of transportation, the data paints a compelling picture of interconnectedness between sports and aviation intrigue.

Now, before anyone jumps to conclusions and starts imagining a world where touchdowns correlate with takeoffs, it's essential to exercise caution in interpreting these results. While the statistical significance cannot be ignored, further exploration into the underlying reasons for this correlation is warranted. After all, correlation does not imply causation, and we must approach this discovery with the rigorous skepticism of a referee reviewing a game-changing call.

In the pursuit of unraveling this mysterious entanglement, our findings raise intriguing questions about the psychology of internet search behavior and the unexpected nexus of unrelated cultural phenomena. Our discovery underscores the need to look beyond the confines of traditional statistical analyses and dare to explore the whimsical and inexplicable patterns that emerge in the vast landscape of data.

As we gear up to delve deeper into the mechanisms driving this correlation, one can't help but marvel at the unlikely bond forged between the realm of sports dominance and the allure of global travel. So, fasten your seatbelts and brace yourselves for what promises to be a turbulent yet exhilarating journey into the enigmatic world of statistical oddities and unexpected connections. After all, as the saying goes, the truth is often stranger than fiction, and in the colorful tapestry of data, the unexpected is always waiting to be uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Super Bowl point difference and Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Super Bowl Blowouts and Mysterious Vanishing Acts: A Statistical Analysis of the Connection Between Point Spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive deep into the correlation between the point difference in Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. While the topic may seem as unrelated as a pineapple on a pizza, our statistical analysis has unveiled some surprising connections. Using data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning from 2008 to 2022, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01. To put it simply, there appears to be a rather strong relationship between blowout wins in the Super Bowl and spikes in searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'. Who would have thought that football and airline mysteries could go hand in hand? This paper aims to shed light on this curious phenomenon and perhaps uncover a touchdown of insights amidst the puzzling turbulence of internet search behavior. Football fan or not, this research is sure to score a chuckle or two while raising eyebrow-raising questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate cultural phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith et al. (2015) examined the relationship between sports outcomes and internet search behavior, focusing on the connection between Super Bowl point differentials and online queries related to travel and airlines. The authors find a moderate positive association between the magnitude of a team's win and the subsequent spike in searches for travel-related topics. However, what truly sets our research apart is the specific focus on searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'.
Doe and Jones (2017) conducted a comprehensive analysis of online search patterns following major sports events, and while their study primarily emphasized the impact of game outcomes on merchandise sales, they did observe a notable uptick in internet searches for international travel destinations. Unbeknownst to them, this data laid the groundwork for our exploration into the unexpected curiosity of 'Malaysia Airlines' searches in the aftermath of Super Bowl blowouts.
Moving beyond scholarly articles, popular non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner and "Outliers: The Story of Success" by Malcolm Gladwell have delved into the realm of seemingly unrelated phenomena and unearthed surprising linkages, inspiring us to apply a similar line of thinking to the unlikely pairing of sports and airline intrigue.
In the world of fiction, the works of Haruki Murakami, particularly "Kafka on the Shore," offer a surreal exploration of mysterious disappearances and unexplainable connections, mirroring the enigmatic ties we seek to unravel between football victories and online searches pertaining to a specific airline.
Now, as we venture into the realm of unexpected references, let's not forget the animated realm. The cartoon series "Scooby-Doo" and the childhood classic "Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego?" may have sparked our fascination with uncovering hidden connections and solving perplexing riddles, setting the stage for the unanticipated correlation we aim to navigate in this research.
With this blend of academic rigor, real-world inspiration, and a touch of whimsy, we aim to cast light on a phenomenon as unexpected as finding a rubber chicken at a football game –the baffling link between Super Bowl point spreads and the enigmatic allure of 'Malaysia Airlines' searches.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a surprising correlation of 0.7055490, with an r-squared of 0.4977993 and a p-value less than 0.01, between the point difference in Super Bowl games and the number of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot unmistakably showcases the strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. While the figure itself may not win any beauty contests, its significance in elucidating this enigmatic connection cannot be overstated.
The statistical evidence suggests that as the point spread of Super Bowl games widens, there is a discernible increase in searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'. It's almost as if the more lopsided the game, the more people are driven to seek solace in the mysteries of air travel. Whether it's the thrill of victory sparking an interest in international travel or the agony of defeat prompting a search for alternative modes of transportation, the data paints a compelling picture of interconnectedness between sports and aviation intrigue.
Now, before anyone jumps to conclusions and starts imagining a world where touchdowns correlate with takeoffs, it's essential to exercise caution in interpreting these results. While the statistical significance cannot be ignored, further exploration into the underlying reasons for this correlation is warranted. After all, correlation does not imply causation, and we must approach this discovery with the rigorous skepticism of a referee reviewing a game-changing call.
In the pursuit of unraveling this mysterious entanglement, our findings raise intriguing questions about the psychology of internet search behavior and the unexpected nexus of unrelated cultural phenomena. Our discovery underscores the need to look beyond the confines of traditional statistical analyses and dare to explore the whimsical and inexplicable patterns that emerge in the vast landscape of data.
As we gear up to delve deeper into the mechanisms driving this correlation, one can't help but marvel at the unlikely bond forged between the realm of sports dominance and the allure of global travel. So, fasten your seatbelts and brace yourselves for what promises to be a turbulent yet exhilarating journey into the enigmatic world of statistical oddities and unexpected connections. After all, as the saying goes, the truth is often stranger than fiction, and in the colorful tapestry of data, the unexpected is always waiting to be uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our discussion centers on the unexpected correlation we've unraveled between Super Bowl point spreads and Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. At first glance, one might be inclined to think, "What on earth do football blowouts and vanished airliners have in common?" However, our findings corroborate previous studies that hinted at the link between sports outcomes and online behaviors related to travel.

Building on the work of Smith et al. (2015), our research not only reaffirms the relationship between the magnitude of a team's win and heightened curiosity about travel but also ventures into the intriguing terrain of 'Malaysia Airlines' searches, which sets it apart from previous inquiries.

The data-backed connection we've established begs the question: Is there a psychological mechanism at play here, or is it simply a case of random, coincidental dynamics? The statistical significance we've uncovered suggests that there could be some underlying rationale for this correlation, and it's not as far-fetched as finding a football under a pile of jet engines. Nevertheless, as in the case of most statistical findings, approaching it with the pragmatic sobriety of a statistician at closing time is essential. Correlation does not entail causation, and we must be cautious in drawing hasty conclusions about the link between sports dominance and aviation curiosity.

Drawing inspiration from non-conventional sources, such as the fictional realm of Haruki Murakami's enigmatic narratives or the childhood whimsy of Scooby-Doo and Carmen Sandiego, has fueled our pursuit of this peculiar connection. And contrary to popular belief, it turns out that mixing a dash of humor and whimsy with rigorous statistical analysis is not as outlandish as, say, putting peanut butter on hamburgers.

But enough about playful references, let's circle back to the serious matter at hand. Our findings pave the way for further investigations into the underlying reasons driving this correlation and can guide future research in unraveling the complexities of internet search behavior and the unsuspecting harmony of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In closing, our study dares to venture into the bewildering realm of statistical oddities and unexpected correlations, essentially turning over stones to unveil the unsought and the extraordinary. This strange and thrilling journey into the labyrinth of interconnected cultural phenomena is not dissimilar to trying to find matching socks after doing laundry on a moonlit night – unpredictable, bewildering, and ripe with unexpected discoveries. Now, as we prepare to embark on the next leg of this research endeavor, one thing is for certain – the charming oddities of statistical significance never cease to amaze.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Super Bowl point difference and Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Super Bowl Blowouts and Mysterious Vanishing Acts: A Statistical Analysis of the Connection Between Point Spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive deep into the correlation between the point difference in Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. While the topic may seem as unrelated as a pineapple on a pizza, our statistical analysis has unveiled some surprising connections. Using data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning from 2008 to 2022, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01. To put it simply, there appears to be a rather strong relationship between blowout wins in the Super Bowl and spikes in searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'. Who would have thought that football and airline mysteries could go hand in hand? This paper aims to shed light on this curious phenomenon and perhaps uncover a touchdown of insights amidst the puzzling turbulence of internet search behavior. Football fan or not, this research is sure to score a chuckle or two while raising eyebrow-raising questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate cultural phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world is full of mysteries. From the enigma of the Bermuda Triangle to the age-old question of why we press the elevator button multiple times when we know it won't make it arrive any faster, there are just certain things that leave us scratching our heads. However, none seem to be as perplexing as the unlikely connection we stumbled upon between seemingly unrelated events: the point spreads of Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'.
At first glance, one might picture an awkward mash-up of football fans frantically googling airplane accident news on Super Bowl Sunday, or perhaps a conspiracy theory involving mysteriously diverted touchdowns. But fear not, dear readers, for our research takes a more statistically grounded approach to unraveling this curious conundrum.
The premise was simple: could the magnitude of a Super Bowl blowout have any bearing on the number of times people are drawn to their screens to inquire about a certain airline based in Southeast Asia? As unlikely as it may sound, our analysis revealed a rather eyebrow-raising correlation of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate subjects.
Now, before you dismiss this revelation as a mere statistical hiccup, let's pause to consider the implications. Could it be that the excitement of football victory sends people flocking to the internet in search of exotic travel destinations? Or perhaps the adrenaline rush from an epic game prompts a spike in interest for global news?
As we embark on this journey to demystify the inexplicable bond between Super Bowl point spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' searches, let us keep an open mind and a healthy dose of skepticism, just like the person who first decided to eat an artichoke.
In the pages that follow, we will delve deeper into the data, explore potential mechanisms at play, and attempt to shed light on this peculiar pattern. So, buckle up and get ready for an adventure that blends the thrill of the gridiron with the mystery of vanished flights. After all, who knows what unexpected twists and turns await us in this unlikely intersection of sports and aviation?

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a surprising correlation of 0.7055490, with an r-squared of 0.4977993 and a p-value less than 0.01, between the point difference in Super Bowl games and the number of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot unmistakably showcases the strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. While the figure itself may not win any beauty contests, its significance in elucidating this enigmatic connection cannot be overstated.
The statistical evidence suggests that as the point spread of Super Bowl games widens, there is a discernible increase in searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'. It's almost as if the more lopsided the game, the more people are driven to seek solace in the mysteries of air travel. Whether it's the thrill of victory sparking an interest in international travel or the agony of defeat prompting a search for alternative modes of transportation, the data paints a compelling picture of interconnectedness between sports and aviation intrigue.
Now, before anyone jumps to conclusions and starts imagining a world where touchdowns correlate with takeoffs, it's essential to exercise caution in interpreting these results. While the statistical significance cannot be ignored, further exploration into the underlying reasons for this correlation is warranted. After all, correlation does not imply causation, and we must approach this discovery with the rigorous skepticism of a referee reviewing a game-changing call.
In the pursuit of unraveling this mysterious entanglement, our findings raise intriguing questions about the psychology of internet search behavior and the unexpected nexus of unrelated cultural phenomena. Our discovery underscores the need to look beyond the confines of traditional statistical analyses and dare to explore the whimsical and inexplicable patterns that emerge in the vast landscape of data.
As we gear up to delve deeper into the mechanisms driving this correlation, one can't help but marvel at the unlikely bond forged between the realm of sports dominance and the allure of global travel. So, fasten your seatbelts and brace yourselves for what promises to be a turbulent yet exhilarating journey into the enigmatic world of statistical oddities and unexpected connections. After all, as the saying goes, the truth is often stranger than fiction, and in the colorful tapestry of data, the unexpected is always waiting to be uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has peeled back the layers of statistical coincidence to reveal a rather surprising association between Super Bowl blowouts and the mysteriously captivating allure of 'Malaysia Airlines' searches. While the connection may initially seem as incongruent as a sumo wrestler at a ballet, our findings unequivocally display a pronounced correlation, prompting us to ponder the psychological underpinnings of such an unexpected twinning.

As we wrap up this quirky journey, it's hard not to marvel at the delightful absurdity of this discovery and the vast extent to which the human mind can weave seemingly unrelated threads into a colorful tapestry of statistical intrigue. Perhaps it's a case of eager football fans dreaming of exotic vacations after witnessing a one-sided victory, or maybe the thrill of the game ignites a wanderlust for far-off destinations. The possibilities are as varied and perplexing as a choose-your-own-adventure novel.

Nevertheless, it's time to bring our exploratory escapade to a close. With the statistical evidence in hand and a hearty chuckle at the unexpected whims of data, we maintain that no further research is needed in this area. Let this curious correlation stand as a testament to the delightful caprice of statistical relationships - a reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, there's always room for the unexpected to make an appearance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Super Bowl Blowouts and Mysterious Vanishing Acts: A Statistical Analysis of the Connection Between Point Spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Super Bowl Blowouts and Mysterious Vanishing Acts: A Statistical Analysis of the Connection Between Point Spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Sports Analytics and Mysterious Events


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Super Bowl Blowouts and Mysterious Vanishing Acts: A Statistical Analysis of the Connection Between Point Spreads and 'Malaysia Airlines' Searches with an abstract of In this paper, we dive deep into the correlation between the point difference in Super Bowl games and the frequency of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'. While the topic may seem as unrelated as a pineapple on a pizza, our statistical analysis has unveiled some surprising connections. Using data from Wikipedia and Google Trends spanning from 2008 to 2022, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7055490 and p < 0.01. To put it simply, there appears to be a rather strong relationship between blowout wins in the Super Bowl and spikes in searches related to 'Malaysia Airlines'. Who would have thought that football and airline mysteries could go hand in hand? This paper aims to shed light on this curious phenomenon and perhaps uncover a touchdown of insights amidst the puzzling turbulence of internet search behavior. Football fan or not, this research is sure to score a chuckle or two while raising eyebrow-raising questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate cultural phenomena.

ChatGPT:

Super Bowl, blowouts, point spreads, statistical analysis, correlation, Google searches, 'Malaysia Airlines', Wikipedia data, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, Super Bowl wins, airline mysteries, internet search behavior, cultural phenomena, touchdown of insights

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Super Bowl point difference
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Super Bowl point difference

Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'

Correlation r = 0.7055490 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4977993 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 49.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Super Bowl point difference) over the 15 years from 2008 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0033. 0.0032960600103508915000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.71 in 0.33% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 303 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.3, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Super Bowl point difference (Points)3414643351414681011223
Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines' (Rel. search volume)2.083332.753.53.253.916674.8333317.91674.752.916672.52.2521.37511.75




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3,4,14,6,4,3,35,14,14,6,8,10,11,22,3,])
array_2 = np.array([2.08333,2.75,3.5,3.25,3.91667,4.83333,17.9167,4.75,2.91667,2.5,2.25,2,1.375,1,1.75,])
array_1_name = "Super Bowl point difference"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 3541 · Black Variable ID: 541 · Red Variable ID: 1441
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0