about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,411 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand and the second variable is CRH plc's stock price (CRH).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the LPG usage in New Zealand soared, it led to a nation-wide spike in backyard barbecuing. This, in turn, created an unprecedented demand for concrete and building materials as enthusiastic DIYers attempted to construct the ultimate outdoor entertainment areas. CRH plc, as a major supplier of these construction essentials, found their stock price sizzling as investors realized the grilling frenzy was boosting the company's bottom line.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that captures a charcoal-style illustration of a vibrant New Zealand backyard scene. The focal point of the image is a BBQ emitting sizzling smoke under a clear blue sky, surrounded by lush greenery. Families and friends are gathered around the BBQ, enjoying a summer feast. In the background, the stock exchange building stands tall, with a towering graph representing the soaring stock price of CRH plc. The intertwining paths of Liquefied petroleum gas and CRH plc's stock price are subtly depicted to illustrate the relationship between the rising demand for BBQs and the surge in concrete and building materials. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Minimalism Charcoal Cutsy graphics Voxel art Charcoal
ChatGPT: Charcoal

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price (CRH), in the following situation: Because the increase in Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand led to a surge in BBQ usage, driving up demand for concrete and building materials, which are CRH's main products, subsequently boosting CRH plc's stock price.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The bright blue skies over New Zealand are filled with the sweet scent of sizzling BBQ smoke as families and friends gather in lush green backyards to enjoy a summer feast. The familiar click of the BBQ being lit can be heard as the demand for Liquefied petroleum gas reaches new heights. Meanwhile, the bustling stock exchange in New Zealand is abuzz with excitement as the CRH plc's stock price graph shoots up like a soaring skyscraper. The intertwining paths of Liquefied petroleum gas and CRH plc's stock price depict a landscape where the rising demand for BBQs fuels the need for concrete and building materials, driving CRH's stock price to new heights.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Charcoal ] and depicting this scene: The bright blue skies over New Zealand are filled with the sweet scent of sizzling BBQ smoke as families and friends gather in lush green backyards to enjoy a summer feast. The familiar click of the BBQ being lit can be heard as the demand for Liquefied petroleum gas reaches new heights. Meanwhile, the bustling stock exchange in New Zealand is abuzz with excitement as the CRH plc's stock price graph shoots up like a soaring skyscraper. The intertwining paths of Liquefied petroleum gas and CRH plc's stock price depict a landscape where the rising demand for BBQs fuels the need for concrete and building materials, driving CRH's stock price to new heights. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that captures a charcoal-style illustration of a vibrant New Zealand backyard scene. The focal point of the image is a BBQ emitting sizzling smoke under a clear blue sky, surrounded by lush greenery. Families and friends are gathered around the BBQ, enjoying a summer feast. In the background, the stock exchange building stands tall, with a towering graph representing the soaring stock price of CRH plc. The intertwining paths of Liquefied petroleum gas and CRH plc's stock price are subtly depicted to illustrate the relationship between the rising demand for BBQs and the surge in concrete and building materials.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand caused CRH plc's stock price (CRH) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Propane Paradox: Exploring the Correlation Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in New Zealand and CRH plc's Stock Price

The Journal of Applied Gas Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Propane Paradox: Exploring the Correlation Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in New Zealand and CRH plc's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research analyzes the intriguing link between the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, incorporating data from Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). Ultimately, we discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings delve into the implications of this correlation, shedding light on the potential impact of LPG dynamics on the stock market, and crack a joke or two about the unexpected relationship between propane and profits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Propane Paradox: Exploring the Correlation Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in New Zealand and CRH plc's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research analyzes the intriguing link between the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, incorporating data from Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). Ultimately, we discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings delve into the implications of this correlation, shedding light on the potential impact of LPG dynamics on the stock market, and crack a joke or two about the unexpected relationship between propane and profits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intertwining of energy commodities and financial markets has long captivated the imagination of researchers and practitioners alike. The correlation between the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, a leading building materials company, presents a particularly curious and, dare I say, gas-tly enigma. This enigmatic relationship between propane and profits underscores the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate elements in the global economy.

LPG, known for its versatility and efficiency, has found its way into various applications, including heating, cooking, and transportation. Meanwhile, CRH plc, a cornerstone of the construction industry, has withstood the ebbs and flows of the market, bolstered by its reputation for steadfastness. The convergence of these seemingly divergent entities in the realm of statistical correlation has raised eyebrows and piqued interest, not unlike a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat – unexpected and yet oddly entertaining.

Drawing on data from reputable sources such as the Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our analysis ventures into uncharted territory to scrutinize the interplay between these two seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160, reminiscent of a sturdy bridge connecting two distant lands. The p-value, holding significance less than 0.01, further emphasizes the statistical significance of this correlation, akin to stumbling upon a rare gem amidst a trove of unremarkable stones.

This paper aims to unravel the mystery shrouding the propane paradox and to stimulate thought-provoking discussions within the realms of energy economics and financial markets. As we delve deeper into the labyrinth of data and insights, we invite readers to join us on a scholarly expedition, with the occasional humorous pun or jest to lighten the academic rigor. After all, what's academia without a dash of wit and whimsy?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Propane Paradox: Exploring the Correlation Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in New Zealand and CRH plc's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research analyzes the intriguing link between the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, incorporating data from Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). Ultimately, we discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings delve into the implications of this correlation, shedding light on the potential impact of LPG dynamics on the stock market, and crack a joke or two about the unexpected relationship between propane and profits.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of energy commodities and financial markets has long captivated the imagination of researchers and practitioners alike. The correlation between the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, a leading building materials company, presents a particularly curious and, dare I say, gas-tly enigma. This enigmatic relationship between propane and profits underscores the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate elements in the global economy.
LPG, known for its versatility and efficiency, has found its way into various applications, including heating, cooking, and transportation. Meanwhile, CRH plc, a cornerstone of the construction industry, has withstood the ebbs and flows of the market, bolstered by its reputation for steadfastness. The convergence of these seemingly divergent entities in the realm of statistical correlation has raised eyebrows and piqued interest, not unlike a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat – unexpected and yet oddly entertaining.
Drawing on data from reputable sources such as the Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our analysis ventures into uncharted territory to scrutinize the interplay between these two seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160, reminiscent of a sturdy bridge connecting two distant lands. The p-value, holding significance less than 0.01, further emphasizes the statistical significance of this correlation, akin to stumbling upon a rare gem amidst a trove of unremarkable stones.
This paper aims to unravel the mystery shrouding the propane paradox and to stimulate thought-provoking discussions within the realms of energy economics and financial markets. As we delve deeper into the labyrinth of data and insights, we invite readers to join us on a scholarly expedition, with the occasional humorous pun or jest to lighten the academic rigor. After all, what's academia without a dash of wit and whimsy?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several studies have delved into the complex relationship between energy commodities and financial markets, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the correlation between Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) use in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price. Smith et al. (2015) explored the impact of energy commodity prices on stock returns, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly distinct economic factors. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) extended this line of inquiry by examining the influence of energy consumption patterns on stock market dynamics, providing a comprehensive overview of the intricate interplay between energy utilization and financial performance.

Additionally, "Economic Implications of Petroleum Markets" by Davis (2017) offers a comprehensive examination of the economic ramifications of petroleum products, although it regrettably neglects the specific whimsical nuance of the LPG-CRH plc relationship. On the other hand, "Energy Economics" by Fuchs (2019) touches upon the broader impact of energy markets on the global economy, yet fails to unravel the propane paradox that tantalizes us.

Turning to the realm of fiction and unconventional inspirations, the classic board game Monopoly explores the fluctuating fortunes tied to property and utilities, offering a metaphorical parallel to the volatility of energy markets and their influence on financial entities. Similarly, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams presents a whimsical and outlandish perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena, inspiring a contemplation of the LPG-CRH plc correlation from a delightfully quirky angle.

While the literature provides valuable insights into the intertwining of energy markets and financial institutions, it remains, dare I say, a bit pedestrian in its exploration of the gas-tly relationship between LPG usage in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc. With this in mind, our study endeavors to inject a hint of levity and intrigue into the ever-serious world of academic inquiry, prompting a chuckle or a raised eyebrow amidst statistical analyses and econometric evaluations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Propane Paradox: Exploring the Correlation Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in New Zealand and CRH plc's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research analyzes the intriguing link between the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, incorporating data from Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). Ultimately, we discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings delve into the implications of this correlation, shedding light on the potential impact of LPG dynamics on the stock market, and crack a joke or two about the unexpected relationship between propane and profits.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of energy commodities and financial markets has long captivated the imagination of researchers and practitioners alike. The correlation between the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, a leading building materials company, presents a particularly curious and, dare I say, gas-tly enigma. This enigmatic relationship between propane and profits underscores the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate elements in the global economy.
LPG, known for its versatility and efficiency, has found its way into various applications, including heating, cooking, and transportation. Meanwhile, CRH plc, a cornerstone of the construction industry, has withstood the ebbs and flows of the market, bolstered by its reputation for steadfastness. The convergence of these seemingly divergent entities in the realm of statistical correlation has raised eyebrows and piqued interest, not unlike a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat – unexpected and yet oddly entertaining.
Drawing on data from reputable sources such as the Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our analysis ventures into uncharted territory to scrutinize the interplay between these two seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160, reminiscent of a sturdy bridge connecting two distant lands. The p-value, holding significance less than 0.01, further emphasizes the statistical significance of this correlation, akin to stumbling upon a rare gem amidst a trove of unremarkable stones.
This paper aims to unravel the mystery shrouding the propane paradox and to stimulate thought-provoking discussions within the realms of energy economics and financial markets. As we delve deeper into the labyrinth of data and insights, we invite readers to join us on a scholarly expedition, with the occasional humorous pun or jest to lighten the academic rigor. After all, what's academia without a dash of wit and whimsy?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to investigate the enigmatic relationship between the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, an exhaustive and, dare I say, exhilarating array of research methodologies was meticulously employed. The data was primarily sourced from the reputable Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to ensure the precision and reliability of our findings.

The first step of our quirky quest was to delve into the LPG consumption data for New Zealand from 2002 to 2022. This involved a thorough analysis of consumption patterns, market trends, and the occasional whimsical observation about the unexpected vitality of propane in the land of the long white cloud.

On the flip side, the stock price of CRH plc was meticulously scrutinized from the same temporal span. We gauged market fluctuations, evaluated the company's financial resilience, and maybe even cracked a joke or two about the stock market's fickle nature along the way.

To quantify the relationship between LPG consumption in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, we employed the illustrious Pearson correlation coefficient. This venerable statistic served as our trusty guide through the labyrinth of data, allowing for the quantification of the strength and direction of the correlation, not unlike a compass pointing towards the elusive connection between propane and profits.

The statistical analysis was complemented by the endearing p-value, which lent credence to the significance of the observed correlation. A p-value, less than 0.01, sparked more excitement in our team than discovering a hidden treasure chest – a rare find indeed!

To ensure the robustness of our findings, a series of sensitivity analyses and robustness checks were conducted, akin to placing a sturdy fence around a mischievous garden to ensure the reliability of the blooming correlation.

Ultimately, our whimsically comprehensive methodology enabled us to not only uncover the captivating correlation between LPG usage in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc but also to inject a sprinkle of humor and wit into the often-stoic realm of academic research.

Stay tuned for the next captivating chapter as we unravel the implications of the propane paradox and delve into the quirky nuances of the energy and financial markets!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8239160, r-squared of 0.6788376, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Propane Paradox: Exploring the Correlation Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in New Zealand and CRH plc's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research analyzes the intriguing link between the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, incorporating data from Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). Ultimately, we discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings delve into the implications of this correlation, shedding light on the potential impact of LPG dynamics on the stock market, and crack a joke or two about the unexpected relationship between propane and profits.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intertwining of energy commodities and financial markets has long captivated the imagination of researchers and practitioners alike. The correlation between the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, a leading building materials company, presents a particularly curious and, dare I say, gas-tly enigma. This enigmatic relationship between propane and profits underscores the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate elements in the global economy.
LPG, known for its versatility and efficiency, has found its way into various applications, including heating, cooking, and transportation. Meanwhile, CRH plc, a cornerstone of the construction industry, has withstood the ebbs and flows of the market, bolstered by its reputation for steadfastness. The convergence of these seemingly divergent entities in the realm of statistical correlation has raised eyebrows and piqued interest, not unlike a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat – unexpected and yet oddly entertaining.
Drawing on data from reputable sources such as the Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our analysis ventures into uncharted territory to scrutinize the interplay between these two seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160, reminiscent of a sturdy bridge connecting two distant lands. The p-value, holding significance less than 0.01, further emphasizes the statistical significance of this correlation, akin to stumbling upon a rare gem amidst a trove of unremarkable stones.
This paper aims to unravel the mystery shrouding the propane paradox and to stimulate thought-provoking discussions within the realms of energy economics and financial markets. As we delve deeper into the labyrinth of data and insights, we invite readers to join us on a scholarly expedition, with the occasional humorous pun or jest to lighten the academic rigor. After all, what's academia without a dash of wit and whimsy?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 suggests a strong positive linear relationship between these two variables. This robust correlation coefficient is like finding a needle in a haystack, only instead of a needle, it's a connection between propane and profits.

The R-squared value of 0.6788376 indicates that approximately 67.88% of the variability in CRH plc's stock price can be explained by the variability in LPG usage in New Zealand. It's as if CRH plc's stock price dabbles in the art of mimicry, following the lead of LPG usage with surprising precision.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation. This result is akin to stumbling upon a four-leaf clover or finding a pot of gold at the end of a statistical rainbow – statistically significant and delightfully unexpected.

Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between LPG usage in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price, showcasing the tightly-knit relationship between these seemingly disparate elements. It's almost as if LPG and stock prices have been secretly holding hands behind the scenes, their connection revealed through the magic of statistical analysis.

Our findings prompt further reflection on the potential implications of LPG dynamics on the stock market, inviting scholarly discussions and, of course, the occasional amusing pun to lighten the weighty matters of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Propane Paradox: Exploring the Correlation Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in New Zealand and CRH plc's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research analyzes the intriguing link between the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, incorporating data from Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). Ultimately, we discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings delve into the implications of this correlation, shedding light on the potential impact of LPG dynamics on the stock market, and crack a joke or two about the unexpected relationship between propane and profits.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have delved into the complex relationship between energy commodities and financial markets, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the correlation between Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) use in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price. Smith et al. (2015) explored the impact of energy commodity prices on stock returns, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly distinct economic factors. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) extended this line of inquiry by examining the influence of energy consumption patterns on stock market dynamics, providing a comprehensive overview of the intricate interplay between energy utilization and financial performance.
Additionally, "Economic Implications of Petroleum Markets" by Davis (2017) offers a comprehensive examination of the economic ramifications of petroleum products, although it regrettably neglects the specific whimsical nuance of the LPG-CRH plc relationship. On the other hand, "Energy Economics" by Fuchs (2019) touches upon the broader impact of energy markets on the global economy, yet fails to unravel the propane paradox that tantalizes us.
Turning to the realm of fiction and unconventional inspirations, the classic board game Monopoly explores the fluctuating fortunes tied to property and utilities, offering a metaphorical parallel to the volatility of energy markets and their influence on financial entities. Similarly, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams presents a whimsical and outlandish perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena, inspiring a contemplation of the LPG-CRH plc correlation from a delightfully quirky angle.
While the literature provides valuable insights into the intertwining of energy markets and financial institutions, it remains, dare I say, a bit pedestrian in its exploration of the gas-tly relationship between LPG usage in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc. With this in mind, our study endeavors to inject a hint of levity and intrigue into the ever-serious world of academic inquiry, prompting a chuckle or a raised eyebrow amidst statistical analyses and econometric evaluations.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 suggests a strong positive linear relationship between these two variables. This robust correlation coefficient is like finding a needle in a haystack, only instead of a needle, it's a connection between propane and profits.
The R-squared value of 0.6788376 indicates that approximately 67.88% of the variability in CRH plc's stock price can be explained by the variability in LPG usage in New Zealand. It's as if CRH plc's stock price dabbles in the art of mimicry, following the lead of LPG usage with surprising precision.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation. This result is akin to stumbling upon a four-leaf clover or finding a pot of gold at the end of a statistical rainbow – statistically significant and delightfully unexpected.
Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between LPG usage in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price, showcasing the tightly-knit relationship between these seemingly disparate elements. It's almost as if LPG and stock prices have been secretly holding hands behind the scenes, their connection revealed through the magic of statistical analysis.
Our findings prompt further reflection on the potential implications of LPG dynamics on the stock market, inviting scholarly discussions and, of course, the occasional amusing pun to lighten the weighty matters of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study reveal a compelling connection between Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) usage in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price, substantiating and extending prior research on the intertwining of energy commodities and financial markets. The findings not only confirm the growing body of literature on the impact of energy utilization on stock performance but also add a whimsical twist to the otherwise "gas-tly" relationship, as alluded to in our literature review.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 solidifies the existence of a strong positive linear relationship between LPG usage in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price. This result aligns with previous studies by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), which emphasized the interconnectedness of energy commodity dynamics and financial outcomes. By extending this line of inquiry to the specific case of LPG and CRH plc, our study not only echoes but also amplifies the intricate interplay between seemingly distinct economic factors—much like a harmonious symphony of statistical analysis and economic theory.

Furthermore, the R-squared value of 0.6788376 underscores the substantial influence of LPG usage on CRH plc's stock price, shedding light on the remarkable mimicry exhibited by the latter in response to the variability in the former. This empirical evidence not only corroborates the prior research but also enriches our understanding of the nuanced relationship between energy consumption patterns and financial performance, emphasizing the profound impact of LPG dynamics on the stock market.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides robust evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation, resonating with the unexpected and statistically significant nature of the results. This finding reaffirms the pioneering work of Davis (2017) and Fuchs (2019), albeit in a refreshingly unconventional context, as we unravel the enigmatic "propane paradox" and its implications for CRH plc's stock price. The compelling statistical significance of this relationship is akin to stumbling upon a buried treasure trove of economic insights, exuding both academic rigor and a hint of serendipity.

In conclusion, our study not only advances the scholarly discourse on the entwined fates of energy commodities and financial entities but also injects a hint of levity into the ever-serious world of academic inquiry, akin to how the classic board game Monopoly and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" inspired a contemplation of the LPG-CRH plc correlation from a delightfully quirky angle. As we delve into the potential implications of LPG dynamics on the stock market, our findings prompt a chuckle or a raised eyebrow amidst the statistical analyses and econometric evaluations, echoing the spirit of unconventional inspirations and infusing a touch of humor into scholarly discussions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Propane Paradox: Exploring the Correlation Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in New Zealand and CRH plc's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research analyzes the intriguing link between the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, incorporating data from Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). Ultimately, we discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings delve into the implications of this correlation, shedding light on the potential impact of LPG dynamics on the stock market, and crack a joke or two about the unexpected relationship between propane and profits.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intertwining of energy commodities and financial markets has long captivated the imagination of researchers and practitioners alike. The correlation between the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, a leading building materials company, presents a particularly curious and, dare I say, gas-tly enigma. This enigmatic relationship between propane and profits underscores the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate elements in the global economy.
LPG, known for its versatility and efficiency, has found its way into various applications, including heating, cooking, and transportation. Meanwhile, CRH plc, a cornerstone of the construction industry, has withstood the ebbs and flows of the market, bolstered by its reputation for steadfastness. The convergence of these seemingly divergent entities in the realm of statistical correlation has raised eyebrows and piqued interest, not unlike a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat – unexpected and yet oddly entertaining.
Drawing on data from reputable sources such as the Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our analysis ventures into uncharted territory to scrutinize the interplay between these two seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160, reminiscent of a sturdy bridge connecting two distant lands. The p-value, holding significance less than 0.01, further emphasizes the statistical significance of this correlation, akin to stumbling upon a rare gem amidst a trove of unremarkable stones.
This paper aims to unravel the mystery shrouding the propane paradox and to stimulate thought-provoking discussions within the realms of energy economics and financial markets. As we delve deeper into the labyrinth of data and insights, we invite readers to join us on a scholarly expedition, with the occasional humorous pun or jest to lighten the academic rigor. After all, what's academia without a dash of wit and whimsy?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price yielded intriguing results. The correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 suggests a strong positive linear relationship between these two variables. This robust correlation coefficient is like finding a needle in a haystack, only instead of a needle, it's a connection between propane and profits.
The R-squared value of 0.6788376 indicates that approximately 67.88% of the variability in CRH plc's stock price can be explained by the variability in LPG usage in New Zealand. It's as if CRH plc's stock price dabbles in the art of mimicry, following the lead of LPG usage with surprising precision.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation. This result is akin to stumbling upon a four-leaf clover or finding a pot of gold at the end of a statistical rainbow – statistically significant and delightfully unexpected.
Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between LPG usage in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price, showcasing the tightly-knit relationship between these seemingly disparate elements. It's almost as if LPG and stock prices have been secretly holding hands behind the scenes, their connection revealed through the magic of statistical analysis.
Our findings prompt further reflection on the potential implications of LPG dynamics on the stock market, inviting scholarly discussions and, of course, the occasional amusing pun to lighten the weighty matters of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has shed light on the intriguing correlation between Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) usage in New Zealand and CRH plc's stock price. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 and the statistically significant p-value offer compelling evidence of a strong positive linear relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. It's as though the stock market and LPG usage have formed an unexpected partnership, akin to an odd couple that somehow makes perfect sense.

Furthermore, the R-squared value of 0.6788376 highlights the substantial proportion of variability in CRH plc's stock price that can be elucidated by fluctuations in LPG usage. It's almost as if the stock market is taking cues from the propane market, performing a tango of supply and demand with finesse.

Our study accentuates the potential impact of LPG dynamics on stock prices and prompts further exploration into this enigmatic correlation. This unlikely relationship between propane and profits opens new avenues for research and stimulates thought-provoking discussions within the realms of energy economics and financial markets. After all, who knew that propane could be more than just a source of energy – it's also a potential indicator of stock market movements.

In light of these findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. The connection between LPG usage in New Zealand and CRH's stock price has been illuminated with statistical clarity, leaving no further room for doubt or disbelief. It's as clear as day - the propane paradox is a genuine statistical phenomenon, and it's high time we embrace the unexpected correlations that lurk within the world of economics and energy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Propane Paradox: Exploring the Correlation Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in New Zealand and CRH plc's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Applied Gas Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Propane Paradox: Exploring the Correlation Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in New Zealand and CRH plc's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Alternative Fuel Research and Economic Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Propane Paradox: Exploring the Correlation Between Liquefied Petroleum Gas in New Zealand and CRH plc's Stock Price with an abstract of This research analyzes the intriguing link between the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in New Zealand and the stock price of CRH plc, incorporating data from Energy Information Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). Ultimately, we discovered a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8239160 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2022. Our findings delve into the implications of this correlation, shedding light on the potential impact of LPG dynamics on the stock market, and crack a joke or two about the unexpected relationship between propane and profits.

ChatGPT:

Liquefied Petroleum Gas, LPG, New Zealand, CRH plc, stock price, correlation, Energy Information Administration, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, correlation coefficient, p-value, stock market, propane, profits

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in New Zealand in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand

CRH plc's stock price (CRH)
Detailed data title: Opening price of CRH plc (CRH) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with CRH plc's stock price (CRH)

Correlation r = 0.8239160 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6788376 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., CRH plc's stock price (CRH)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.4E-6. 0.0000044210188857465735000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.00044% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 226,192 random variables You don't actually need 226 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand (Million Barrels/Day)4.383564.38635.013665.01375.37265.561645.448095.312334.482194.405484.75414.635624.832885.079455.390715.726035.843846.052055.868856.134256.17808
CRH plc's stock price (CRH) (Stock price)17.612.5320.8527.1729.842.435.3725.627.9421.0320.2621.0325.4923.9528.2634.0136.0326.0340.8743.5753.04




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.38356,4.3863,5.01366,5.0137,5.3726,5.56164,5.44809,5.31233,4.48219,4.40548,4.7541,4.63562,4.83288,5.07945,5.39071,5.72603,5.84384,6.05205,5.86885,6.13425,6.17808,])
array_2 = np.array([17.6,12.53,20.85,27.17,29.8,42.4,35.37,25.6,27.94,21.03,20.26,21.03,25.49,23.95,28.26,34.01,36.03,26.03,40.87,43.57,53.04,])
array_1_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Zealand"
array_2_name = "CRH plc's stock price (CRH)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3411 · Black Variable ID: 24752 · Red Variable ID: 1780
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0