about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,131 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and the second variable is Humana's stock price (HUM).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As bottled water consumption rose, people's muscles were getting a regular workout from lifting those heavy bottles, leading to a higher demand for healthcare services. This, in turn, boosted Humana's stock price as investors anticipated increased business for the company. Who knew staying hydrated could pump up not just your water intake, but also your investment portfolio!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that captures the scene of a desert landscape with a clear blue sky. In the foreground, there is a person holding a bottle of water and taking a drink from it. In the background, there is a stock market ticker displaying Humana's (HUM) stock price rising rapidly. In the sand, there is a message in a bottle with a glowing genie figure. The style of the image should resemble a humorous and quirky post you might find on reddit. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Humana's stock price (HUM). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Concept art Pop art a funny image you would see on reddit Brutalism
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Humana's stock price (HUM), in the following situation: Because as people drank more bottled water, they discovered a message in a bottle from a genie promising good health, boosting Humana's stock price.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A desert landscape with a clear blue sky. In the foreground, there is a person holding a bottle of water, drinking from it. In the background, a stock market ticker displaying Humana's (HUM) stock price rising rapidly. On the sand, there is a message in a bottle with a glowing genie figure.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: A desert landscape with a clear blue sky. In the foreground, there is a person holding a bottle of water, drinking from it. In the background, a stock market ticker displaying Humana's (HUM) stock price rising rapidly. On the sand, there is a message in a bottle with a glowing genie figure. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that captures the scene of a desert landscape with a clear blue sky. In the foreground, there is a person holding a bottle of water and taking a drink from it. In the background, there is a stock market ticker displaying Humana's (HUM) stock price rising rapidly. In the sand, there is a message in a bottle with a glowing genie figure. The style of the image should resemble a humorous and quirky post you might find on reddit.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US Bottled Water Consumption per Person caused Humana's stock price (HUM) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Flowing Financials: The Surprising Connection Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Humana's Stock Price

Journal of Financial Hydration Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Humana's stock price (HUM). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9359240 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Flowing Financials: The Surprising Connection Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Humana's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of finance, where every drop of data is scrutinized to make sense of stock market fluctuations, our research aims to quench the curiosity surrounding the correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM). Using data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning the years 2002 to 2022, we uncorked a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9359240 with p < 0.01, creating waves of surprise in the financial community.

By analyzing this data, we have sought to delve into the deep waters of market dynamics, uncovering a link that not only trickles but flows between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the performance of Humana's stock. It seems the hidden current of consumer behavior in hydration preferences subtly influences the tides of the stock market, eliciting ripples of laughter from finance professionals who may have overlooked this unexpected connection – a twist of irony as refreshing as a chilled bottle of spring water.

In conducting this research, we have provided evidence supporting the idea that monitoring bottled water consumption may be more than just a drop in the bucket when it comes to predicting stock price movements. The findings imply that the market may indeed sway with the ebb and flow of hydration trends, prompting us to reflect on the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables in financial forecasting. With the fluid nature of market dynamics becoming clearer, it seems the stock market might just be thirstier for consumer insights than previously thought - a refreshing revelation for both investors and researchers alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Humana's stock price (HUM). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Flowing Financials: The Surprising Connection Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Humana's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of finance, where every drop of data is scrutinized to make sense of stock market fluctuations, our research aims to quench the curiosity surrounding the correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM). Using data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning the years 2002 to 2022, we uncorked a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9359240 with p < 0.01, creating waves of surprise in the financial community.

By analyzing this data, we have sought to delve into the deep waters of market dynamics, uncovering a link that not only trickles but flows between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the performance of Humana's stock. It seems the hidden current of consumer behavior in hydration preferences subtly influences the tides of the stock market, eliciting ripples of laughter from finance professionals who may have overlooked this unexpected connection – a twist of irony as refreshing as a chilled bottle of spring water.

In conducting this research, we have provided evidence supporting the idea that monitoring bottled water consumption may be more than just a drop in the bucket when it comes to predicting stock price movements. The findings imply that the market may indeed sway with the ebb and flow of hydration trends, prompting us to reflect on the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables in financial forecasting. With the fluid nature of market dynamics becoming clearer, it seems the stock market might just be thirstier for consumer insights than previously thought - a refreshing revelation for both investors and researchers alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The finance world is often akin to navigating choppy waters, where understanding the currents that drive stock market movements can mean the difference between smooth sailing and being left adrift. In this context, the connection we have uncovered between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Humana (HUM) may seem like a drop in the ocean of financial data, but the implications are far from shallow.

As financial researchers, we often come across unexpected correlations that make us ponder the depths of market influence. The relationship we have unveiled between bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price is no mere "water-cooler talk," but a concrete demonstration of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate forces in the market. It's all the evidence we need to show that sometimes, when it rains, it pours – economically speaking, of course.

Our investigation into this unlikely association has not only quenched our thirst for knowledge but has also raised a few eyebrows in the financial community. It seems our findings have made quite a splash, prompting both water-related and finance-related puns to flood our discussions. Who knew that studying hydration habits and stock prices could lead to such a deep well of amusement?

Stay tuned for the rest of the paper to uncover the refreshing insights into the link between US bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price. We assure you, the journey promises to be just as satisfying and unexpected as finding a $20 bill in your old winter coat – a surprising windfall in the sea of financial research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Humana's stock price (HUM). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Flowing Financials: The Surprising Connection Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Humana's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of finance, where every drop of data is scrutinized to make sense of stock market fluctuations, our research aims to quench the curiosity surrounding the correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM). Using data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning the years 2002 to 2022, we uncorked a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9359240 with p < 0.01, creating waves of surprise in the financial community.

By analyzing this data, we have sought to delve into the deep waters of market dynamics, uncovering a link that not only trickles but flows between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the performance of Humana's stock. It seems the hidden current of consumer behavior in hydration preferences subtly influences the tides of the stock market, eliciting ripples of laughter from finance professionals who may have overlooked this unexpected connection – a twist of irony as refreshing as a chilled bottle of spring water.

In conducting this research, we have provided evidence supporting the idea that monitoring bottled water consumption may be more than just a drop in the bucket when it comes to predicting stock price movements. The findings imply that the market may indeed sway with the ebb and flow of hydration trends, prompting us to reflect on the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables in financial forecasting. With the fluid nature of market dynamics becoming clearer, it seems the stock market might just be thirstier for consumer insights than previously thought - a refreshing revelation for both investors and researchers alike.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The finance world is often akin to navigating choppy waters, where understanding the currents that drive stock market movements can mean the difference between smooth sailing and being left adrift. In this context, the connection we have uncovered between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Humana (HUM) may seem like a drop in the ocean of financial data, but the implications are far from shallow.
As financial researchers, we often come across unexpected correlations that make us ponder the depths of market influence. The relationship we have unveiled between bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price is no mere "water-cooler talk," but a concrete demonstration of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate forces in the market. It's all the evidence we need to show that sometimes, when it rains, it pours – economically speaking, of course.
Our investigation into this unlikely association has not only quenched our thirst for knowledge but has also raised a few eyebrows in the financial community. It seems our findings have made quite a splash, prompting both water-related and finance-related puns to flood our discussions. Who knew that studying hydration habits and stock prices could lead to such a deep well of amusement?
Stay tuned for the rest of the paper to uncover the refreshing insights into the link between US bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price. We assure you, the journey promises to be just as satisfying and unexpected as finding a $20 bill in your old winter coat – a surprising windfall in the sea of financial research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Humana (HUM) has inspired a deluge of academic inquiries. In "Hydrated Economics: A Thirst for Financial Insights," Smith et al. explore the impact of consumer hydration preferences on stock market dynamics, providing a thorough analysis of the potential correlations. This captivating account of the fluid nature of financial markets immerses readers in the depths of economic unpredictability, making it crystal clear that when it comes to market influences, sometimes the thirst is real.

Doe's "The Drip Effect: Hydration Trends and Stock Market Ripples" delves further into the intersection of consumer hydration behavior and financial performance, shedding light on the unexpected currents that guide market movements. At times, it seems the ebb and flow of stock prices may be as unpredictable as a leaky faucet, leaving investors to wonder if they are simply treading water in the vast sea of economic uncertainty.

Meanwhile, in "The Hydration Hypothesis: Liquid Assets and Stock Valuation," Jones et al. fish for an understanding of the underlying mechanics behind the relationship between bottled water consumption and stock prices. The unexpected surge of interest in this uncharted territory highlights the captivating nature of market anomalies – after all, who would have expected to find such a deep well of financial insights in something as commonplace as a water bottle?

Turning to non-fiction sources, "Bottled Water: A Global Perspective" and "The Economics of Thirst: Hydration and Consumer Behavior" provide a factual framework for understanding the broader implications of bottled water consumption on consumer choices and market trends. These insightful works demonstrate that even the most innocuous aspects of daily life can send ripples through the economic landscape, proving that when it comes to predicting market movements, every drop counts.

In a surprising twist, fictional works such as "The Fountain of Fortune" and "Liquid Dreams: A Financial Fable" provide an imaginative exploration of the intersection between liquid assets and stock market success. While these narratives may be a departure from traditional economic analyses, they offer a refreshing take on the fluid nature of financial dynamics, reminding us that sometimes, when it comes to market influences, truth is indeed stranger than fiction.

Drawing from an eclectic mix of sources, including financial reports, economic analyses, and even the backs of shampoo bottles, our literature review has charted a course through the unexpected depths of the connection between US bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price. As we navigate these uncharted waters, it becomes clear that the correlation between hydration trends and stock market performance may be more than just a splash in the pan of financial data – it could be the ripple that makes all the waves in the world of finance. And so, we dive deeper, buoyed by the anticipation of uncovering the refreshing insights that lie beneath the surface.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Humana's stock price (HUM). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Flowing Financials: The Surprising Connection Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Humana's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of finance, where every drop of data is scrutinized to make sense of stock market fluctuations, our research aims to quench the curiosity surrounding the correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM). Using data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning the years 2002 to 2022, we uncorked a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9359240 with p < 0.01, creating waves of surprise in the financial community.

By analyzing this data, we have sought to delve into the deep waters of market dynamics, uncovering a link that not only trickles but flows between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the performance of Humana's stock. It seems the hidden current of consumer behavior in hydration preferences subtly influences the tides of the stock market, eliciting ripples of laughter from finance professionals who may have overlooked this unexpected connection – a twist of irony as refreshing as a chilled bottle of spring water.

In conducting this research, we have provided evidence supporting the idea that monitoring bottled water consumption may be more than just a drop in the bucket when it comes to predicting stock price movements. The findings imply that the market may indeed sway with the ebb and flow of hydration trends, prompting us to reflect on the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables in financial forecasting. With the fluid nature of market dynamics becoming clearer, it seems the stock market might just be thirstier for consumer insights than previously thought - a refreshing revelation for both investors and researchers alike.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The finance world is often akin to navigating choppy waters, where understanding the currents that drive stock market movements can mean the difference between smooth sailing and being left adrift. In this context, the connection we have uncovered between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Humana (HUM) may seem like a drop in the ocean of financial data, but the implications are far from shallow.
As financial researchers, we often come across unexpected correlations that make us ponder the depths of market influence. The relationship we have unveiled between bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price is no mere "water-cooler talk," but a concrete demonstration of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate forces in the market. It's all the evidence we need to show that sometimes, when it rains, it pours – economically speaking, of course.
Our investigation into this unlikely association has not only quenched our thirst for knowledge but has also raised a few eyebrows in the financial community. It seems our findings have made quite a splash, prompting both water-related and finance-related puns to flood our discussions. Who knew that studying hydration habits and stock prices could lead to such a deep well of amusement?
Stay tuned for the rest of the paper to uncover the refreshing insights into the link between US bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price. We assure you, the journey promises to be just as satisfying and unexpected as finding a $20 bill in your old winter coat – a surprising windfall in the sea of financial research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the connection between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM), we embarked on a research journey that made us feel like financial hydrologists, navigating the currents of market data to unearth a correlation that, dare we say, is as pure as mountain spring water. Our data collection primarily drew from the well of Statista and the streams of LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), aggregating information from 2002 to 2022.

First, we dived into the depths of statistical analysis, using a variety of tools to ensure we didn't just tread water in the sea of data. Like certified water diviners, we calculated the correlation coefficient, reaching a value of 0.9359240 with a p-value of less than 0.01 – a finding that made a significant splash in the world of finance.

Our methodology also included a novel approach, incorporating a water-based hypothesis testing model. We affectionately named it the "H2-Oh-No-You-Didn't" model, where we simulated market scenarios while providing constant hydration to office plants, believing that through osmosis, their well-being would reflect market movements. Alas, this method turned out to be all wet, yielding results as unpredictable as a leaky faucet.

Next, we donned our hip boots and waded into the world of multivariate analysis, teasing out other potential influencers on Humana's stock price. We examined factors such as economic indicators, healthcare policy changes, and consumer sentiment, ensuring that our conclusions were as clear as – you guessed it – an artesian well.

Furthermore, we harnessed the power of time series analysis to explore the temporal dynamics of both bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price, ensuring we didn't miss any ripples or waves in the market data. We calibrated our financial sonar to detect any potential lag effects, making sure our findings wouldn’t be as murky as a muddy pond on a rainy day.

Finally, to validate the robustness of our findings, we executed a Monte Carlo simulation, simulating hypothetical scenarios to test the resilience of the observed correlation. Let's just say our models weren't all wet – they actually held water quite well, reaffirming the strength of the correlation we uncovered.

*"I used to be a financial hydrologist, but I diluted my career prospects while trying to make a splash in the market."*


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Humana's stock price (HUM). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9359240, r-squared of 0.8759538, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Flowing Financials: The Surprising Connection Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Humana's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of finance, where every drop of data is scrutinized to make sense of stock market fluctuations, our research aims to quench the curiosity surrounding the correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM). Using data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning the years 2002 to 2022, we uncorked a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9359240 with p < 0.01, creating waves of surprise in the financial community.

By analyzing this data, we have sought to delve into the deep waters of market dynamics, uncovering a link that not only trickles but flows between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the performance of Humana's stock. It seems the hidden current of consumer behavior in hydration preferences subtly influences the tides of the stock market, eliciting ripples of laughter from finance professionals who may have overlooked this unexpected connection – a twist of irony as refreshing as a chilled bottle of spring water.

In conducting this research, we have provided evidence supporting the idea that monitoring bottled water consumption may be more than just a drop in the bucket when it comes to predicting stock price movements. The findings imply that the market may indeed sway with the ebb and flow of hydration trends, prompting us to reflect on the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables in financial forecasting. With the fluid nature of market dynamics becoming clearer, it seems the stock market might just be thirstier for consumer insights than previously thought - a refreshing revelation for both investors and researchers alike.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The finance world is often akin to navigating choppy waters, where understanding the currents that drive stock market movements can mean the difference between smooth sailing and being left adrift. In this context, the connection we have uncovered between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Humana (HUM) may seem like a drop in the ocean of financial data, but the implications are far from shallow.
As financial researchers, we often come across unexpected correlations that make us ponder the depths of market influence. The relationship we have unveiled between bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price is no mere "water-cooler talk," but a concrete demonstration of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate forces in the market. It's all the evidence we need to show that sometimes, when it rains, it pours – economically speaking, of course.
Our investigation into this unlikely association has not only quenched our thirst for knowledge but has also raised a few eyebrows in the financial community. It seems our findings have made quite a splash, prompting both water-related and finance-related puns to flood our discussions. Who knew that studying hydration habits and stock prices could lead to such a deep well of amusement?
Stay tuned for the rest of the paper to uncover the refreshing insights into the link between US bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price. We assure you, the journey promises to be just as satisfying and unexpected as finding a $20 bill in your old winter coat – a surprising windfall in the sea of financial research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis of US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM) over the period of 2002 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9359240, with an r-squared value of 0.8759538, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, making a splash in the understanding of market dynamics.

Fig. 1 displays the unmistakable connection between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price, highlighting the consistent and strong relationship observed in our analysis.

It appears that the waves of consumer behavior in hydration preferences have had a more profound influence on the tides of the stock market than previously thought. It turns out, keeping an eye on the ebb and flow of bottled water consumption may offer a new lens through which to anticipate fluctuations in stock prices. Just when we thought we'd seen it all in financial research, this unexpected correlation washes ashore as a refreshing reminder that the market's twists and turns can still surprise us.

Investors and analysts may now find themselves incorporating the flow of hydration preferences into their market outlooks, as our findings suggest that this seemingly mundane aspect of consumer behavior could hold the key to understanding stock price movements. In the world of finance, it seems even the simplest conclusions can have a ripple effect on how we analyze and predict market trends.

It's safe to say that our research has uncorked a refreshing interpretation of market dynamics, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the unexpected interconnectedness of consumer habits and stock performance. After all, who would have thought that a sip of bottled water and a stock price could make such a swell pair?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Humana's stock price (HUM). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Flowing Financials: The Surprising Connection Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Humana's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of finance, where every drop of data is scrutinized to make sense of stock market fluctuations, our research aims to quench the curiosity surrounding the correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM). Using data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning the years 2002 to 2022, we uncorked a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9359240 with p < 0.01, creating waves of surprise in the financial community.

By analyzing this data, we have sought to delve into the deep waters of market dynamics, uncovering a link that not only trickles but flows between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the performance of Humana's stock. It seems the hidden current of consumer behavior in hydration preferences subtly influences the tides of the stock market, eliciting ripples of laughter from finance professionals who may have overlooked this unexpected connection – a twist of irony as refreshing as a chilled bottle of spring water.

In conducting this research, we have provided evidence supporting the idea that monitoring bottled water consumption may be more than just a drop in the bucket when it comes to predicting stock price movements. The findings imply that the market may indeed sway with the ebb and flow of hydration trends, prompting us to reflect on the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables in financial forecasting. With the fluid nature of market dynamics becoming clearer, it seems the stock market might just be thirstier for consumer insights than previously thought - a refreshing revelation for both investors and researchers alike.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Humana (HUM) has inspired a deluge of academic inquiries. In "Hydrated Economics: A Thirst for Financial Insights," Smith et al. explore the impact of consumer hydration preferences on stock market dynamics, providing a thorough analysis of the potential correlations. This captivating account of the fluid nature of financial markets immerses readers in the depths of economic unpredictability, making it crystal clear that when it comes to market influences, sometimes the thirst is real.
Doe's "The Drip Effect: Hydration Trends and Stock Market Ripples" delves further into the intersection of consumer hydration behavior and financial performance, shedding light on the unexpected currents that guide market movements. At times, it seems the ebb and flow of stock prices may be as unpredictable as a leaky faucet, leaving investors to wonder if they are simply treading water in the vast sea of economic uncertainty.
Meanwhile, in "The Hydration Hypothesis: Liquid Assets and Stock Valuation," Jones et al. fish for an understanding of the underlying mechanics behind the relationship between bottled water consumption and stock prices. The unexpected surge of interest in this uncharted territory highlights the captivating nature of market anomalies – after all, who would have expected to find such a deep well of financial insights in something as commonplace as a water bottle?
Turning to non-fiction sources, "Bottled Water: A Global Perspective" and "The Economics of Thirst: Hydration and Consumer Behavior" provide a factual framework for understanding the broader implications of bottled water consumption on consumer choices and market trends. These insightful works demonstrate that even the most innocuous aspects of daily life can send ripples through the economic landscape, proving that when it comes to predicting market movements, every drop counts.
In a surprising twist, fictional works such as "The Fountain of Fortune" and "Liquid Dreams: A Financial Fable" provide an imaginative exploration of the intersection between liquid assets and stock market success. While these narratives may be a departure from traditional economic analyses, they offer a refreshing take on the fluid nature of financial dynamics, reminding us that sometimes, when it comes to market influences, truth is indeed stranger than fiction.
Drawing from an eclectic mix of sources, including financial reports, economic analyses, and even the backs of shampoo bottles, our literature review has charted a course through the unexpected depths of the connection between US bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price. As we navigate these uncharted waters, it becomes clear that the correlation between hydration trends and stock market performance may be more than just a splash in the pan of financial data – it could be the ripple that makes all the waves in the world of finance. And so, we dive deeper, buoyed by the anticipation of uncovering the refreshing insights that lie beneath the surface.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis of US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM) over the period of 2002 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9359240, with an r-squared value of 0.8759538, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, making a splash in the understanding of market dynamics.
Fig. 1 displays the unmistakable connection between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price, highlighting the consistent and strong relationship observed in our analysis.
It appears that the waves of consumer behavior in hydration preferences have had a more profound influence on the tides of the stock market than previously thought. It turns out, keeping an eye on the ebb and flow of bottled water consumption may offer a new lens through which to anticipate fluctuations in stock prices. Just when we thought we'd seen it all in financial research, this unexpected correlation washes ashore as a refreshing reminder that the market's twists and turns can still surprise us.
Investors and analysts may now find themselves incorporating the flow of hydration preferences into their market outlooks, as our findings suggest that this seemingly mundane aspect of consumer behavior could hold the key to understanding stock price movements. In the world of finance, it seems even the simplest conclusions can have a ripple effect on how we analyze and predict market trends.
It's safe to say that our research has uncorked a refreshing interpretation of market dynamics, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the unexpected interconnectedness of consumer habits and stock performance. After all, who would have thought that a sip of bottled water and a stock price could make such a swell pair?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has delved deep into the world of financial anomalies and unearthed a surprising connection between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price. The results of our analysis have lent support to previous findings in the literature, bubbling up new insights and prompting a refreshing perspective on market dynamics. This unexpected correlation throws a splash of cold water on conventional wisdom, serving as a compelling reminder that even the most seemingly mundane factors can cause waves in the stock market.

Our findings align with the work of Smith et al., Doe, and Jones et al., all of whom sought to understand the influence of consumer hydration preferences on stock market fluctuations. The substantial positive correlation coefficient we uncovered echoes the sentiments expressed by these esteemed authors, reinforcing the notion that the ebb and flow of hydration trends can indeed impact stock prices. It seems that the connection between bottled water consumption and stock performance is not just a drop in the ocean of financial research, but rather a significant current in the tide of market analysis.

Furthermore, our results bring to light the potential for incorporating consumer hydration trends into financial forecasting and analysis. This unexpected correlation may prompt investors and analysts to consider the relevance of seemingly unrelated variables, stirring new ripples of curiosity in the world of finance. As we dive deeper into the implications of our findings, it becomes clear that even the most overlooked aspects of consumer behavior can have a ripple effect on stock market movements.

In a financial landscape where every drop counts, our research serves as a refreshing reminder that the market's twists and turns are not always as predictable as they seem. As the saying goes, "water under the bridge" takes on a whole new meaning in our exploration of market dynamics. It seems that in the world of finance, sometimes the thirst for knowledge can be quenched with a surprising sip of bottled water and a glance at stock prices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Humana's stock price (HUM). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Flowing Financials: The Surprising Connection Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Humana's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of finance, where every drop of data is scrutinized to make sense of stock market fluctuations, our research aims to quench the curiosity surrounding the correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM). Using data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning the years 2002 to 2022, we uncorked a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9359240 with p < 0.01, creating waves of surprise in the financial community.

By analyzing this data, we have sought to delve into the deep waters of market dynamics, uncovering a link that not only trickles but flows between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the performance of Humana's stock. It seems the hidden current of consumer behavior in hydration preferences subtly influences the tides of the stock market, eliciting ripples of laughter from finance professionals who may have overlooked this unexpected connection – a twist of irony as refreshing as a chilled bottle of spring water.

In conducting this research, we have provided evidence supporting the idea that monitoring bottled water consumption may be more than just a drop in the bucket when it comes to predicting stock price movements. The findings imply that the market may indeed sway with the ebb and flow of hydration trends, prompting us to reflect on the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables in financial forecasting. With the fluid nature of market dynamics becoming clearer, it seems the stock market might just be thirstier for consumer insights than previously thought - a refreshing revelation for both investors and researchers alike.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The finance world is often akin to navigating choppy waters, where understanding the currents that drive stock market movements can mean the difference between smooth sailing and being left adrift. In this context, the connection we have uncovered between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Humana (HUM) may seem like a drop in the ocean of financial data, but the implications are far from shallow.
As financial researchers, we often come across unexpected correlations that make us ponder the depths of market influence. The relationship we have unveiled between bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price is no mere "water-cooler talk," but a concrete demonstration of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate forces in the market. It's all the evidence we need to show that sometimes, when it rains, it pours – economically speaking, of course.
Our investigation into this unlikely association has not only quenched our thirst for knowledge but has also raised a few eyebrows in the financial community. It seems our findings have made quite a splash, prompting both water-related and finance-related puns to flood our discussions. Who knew that studying hydration habits and stock prices could lead to such a deep well of amusement?
Stay tuned for the rest of the paper to uncover the refreshing insights into the link between US bottled water consumption and Humana's stock price. We assure you, the journey promises to be just as satisfying and unexpected as finding a $20 bill in your old winter coat – a surprising windfall in the sea of financial research.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis of US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM) over the period of 2002 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9359240, with an r-squared value of 0.8759538, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, making a splash in the understanding of market dynamics.
Fig. 1 displays the unmistakable connection between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price, highlighting the consistent and strong relationship observed in our analysis.
It appears that the waves of consumer behavior in hydration preferences have had a more profound influence on the tides of the stock market than previously thought. It turns out, keeping an eye on the ebb and flow of bottled water consumption may offer a new lens through which to anticipate fluctuations in stock prices. Just when we thought we'd seen it all in financial research, this unexpected correlation washes ashore as a refreshing reminder that the market's twists and turns can still surprise us.
Investors and analysts may now find themselves incorporating the flow of hydration preferences into their market outlooks, as our findings suggest that this seemingly mundane aspect of consumer behavior could hold the key to understanding stock price movements. In the world of finance, it seems even the simplest conclusions can have a ripple effect on how we analyze and predict market trends.
It's safe to say that our research has uncorked a refreshing interpretation of market dynamics, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the unexpected interconnectedness of consumer habits and stock performance. After all, who would have thought that a sip of bottled water and a stock price could make such a swell pair?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has poured a ton of insight into the seemingly quenchless depths of market dynamics, unearthing the surprising connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Humana (HUM). The statistically significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9359240 has made waves in financial circles, prompting scintillating discussions and refreshing realizations about the ripple effects of consumer behavior on stock performance.

As our findings highlight, the ebb and flow of bottled water consumption might just be the unexpected undercurrent that influences the tides of the stock market. In a financial landscape where every drop counts, it's clear that monitoring hydration trends could be the aqua vitae of market forecasting – a revelation as refreshing as a tall glass of ice-cold water on a scorching summer day.

It seems that in the sea of financial data, even the most seemingly unassuming factors can make a splash – a sight as unexpected as finding a shipwrecked pirate's treasure chest filled with gold doubloons. After our rigorous analysis, it's evident that staying hydrated is not just crucial for our health but may also hold the key to navigating the tempestuous waters of the stock market.

In light of these findings, it's safe to say that no more research is needed in this area. After all, we've already made enough waves!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Flowing Financials: The Surprising Connection Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Humana's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Financial Hydration Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Flowing Financials: The Surprising Connection Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Humana's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Aquatic Economics and Beverage Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Flowing Financials: The Surprising Connection Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Humana's Stock Price with an abstract of In the world of finance, where every drop of data is scrutinized to make sense of stock market fluctuations, our research aims to quench the curiosity surrounding the correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and Humana's stock price (HUM). Using data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning the years 2002 to 2022, we uncorked a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9359240 with p < 0.01, creating waves of surprise in the financial community.
By analyzing this data, we have sought to delve into the deep waters of market dynamics, uncovering a link that not only trickles but flows between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the performance of Humana's stock. It seems the hidden current of consumer behavior in hydration preferences subtly influences the tides of the stock market, eliciting ripples of laughter from finance professionals who may have overlooked this unexpected connection – a twist of irony as refreshing as a chilled bottle of spring water.
In conducting this research, we have provided evidence supporting the idea that monitoring bottled water consumption may be more than just a drop in the bucket when it comes to predicting stock price movements. The findings imply that the market may indeed sway with the ebb and flow of hydration trends, prompting us to reflect on the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables in financial forecasting. With the fluid nature of market dynamics becoming clearer, it seems the stock market might just be thirstier for consumer insights than previously thought - a refreshing revelation for both investors and researchers alike.

ChatGPT:

US bottled water consumption, Humana stock price, correlation, Statista, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, market dynamics, consumer behavior, hydration preferences, stock market fluctuations, financial forecasting, market insights, consumer insights, stock price movements, financial research, market dynamics, consumer behavior, hydration preferences, stock market fluctuations, financial forecasting, market insights, consumer insights, stock price movements

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US Bottled Water Consumption per Person
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with US Bottled Water Consumption per Person

Humana's stock price (HUM)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Humana (HUM) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Humana's stock price (HUM)

Correlation r = 0.9359240 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8759538 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Humana's stock price (HUM)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US Bottled Water Consumption per Person) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.7E-10. 0.0000000004696444557496317000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 4.7E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,129,270,319 random variables You don't actually need 2 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person (Gallons)20.121.623.225.427.62928.527.628.329.230.83234.136.5394242.34445.24746.5
Humana's stock price (HUM) (Stock price)11.810.123.0529.8654.9155.4676.5137.3844.4355.0689.2169.74102.76144.95177.67202.87249.36283.31367.16417.82461.38




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([20.1,21.6,23.2,25.4,27.6,29,28.5,27.6,28.3,29.2,30.8,32,34.1,36.5,39,42,42.3,44,45.2,47,46.5,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8,10.1,23.05,29.86,54.91,55.46,76.51,37.38,44.43,55.06,89.21,69.74,102.76,144.95,177.67,202.87,249.36,283.31,367.16,417.82,461.38,])
array_1_name = "US Bottled Water Consumption per Person"
array_2_name = "Humana's stock price (HUM)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 3131 · Black Variable ID: 32 · Red Variable ID: 1708
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0