about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,834 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of public school students in 1st grade and the second variable is Number of Public Library Members in the UK.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2014, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the 1st graders learned to read, they began borrowing more books from the public libraries. This increased demand for library cards, leading to a surge in public library memberships across the UK.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a whimsical school playground scene with a magical touch for the magic realism style. Show a vibrant and bustling playground, with children in 1st grade playing and interacting. Illustrate the backdrop of a grand and majestic public library in the distance, beckoning the children with open doors. Capture the excitement and anticipation on the children's faces as they eagerly line up with colorful backpacks to sign up for their library membership cards, conveying a sense of wonder and adventure. Emphasize the enchanting and fantastical elements of the scene to evoke a feeling of magic and delight. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of public school students in 1st grade and Number of Public Library Members in the UK. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Magic realism a meme Photorealism Oragami
ChatGPT: Magic realism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of public school students in 1st grade and Number of Public Library Members in the UK, in the following situation: Number of public school students in 1st grade caused Number of Public Library Members in the UK to increase because as the young scholars embark on their educational journey, they develop a voracious appetite for knowledge and exciting stories. This leads them to frequent their local public libraries, where they eagerly sign up for memberships to quench their thirst for literary adventure. So, as the number of eager young minds grows in the classroom, so too does the number of library card-carrying enthusiasts in the local community.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a bustling school playground filled with children in 1st grade, their eager faces filled with excitement for their learning journey ahead. In the distance, a majestic public library stands tall, its doors open wide to welcome the young scholars. The children, carrying colorful backpacks, eagerly rush to the library, where they line up with beaming smiles to sign up for their library membership cards, as if embarking on a wondrous adventure.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Magic realism ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a bustling school playground filled with children in 1st grade, their eager faces filled with excitement for their learning journey ahead. In the distance, a majestic public library stands tall, its doors open wide to welcome the young scholars. The children, carrying colorful backpacks, eagerly rush to the library, where they line up with beaming smiles to sign up for their library membership cards, as if embarking on a wondrous adventure. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a whimsical school playground scene with a magical touch for the magic realism style. Show a vibrant and bustling playground, with children in 1st grade playing and interacting. Illustrate the backdrop of a grand and majestic public library in the distance, beckoning the children with open doors. Capture the excitement and anticipation on the children's faces as they eagerly line up with colorful backpacks to sign up for their library membership cards, conveying a sense of wonder and adventure. Emphasize the enchanting and fantastical elements of the scene to evoke a feeling of magic and delight.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Number of public school students in 1st grade caused Number of Public Library Members in the UK to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Great Debate: 1st Grade Fate and Library Member Weight

Journal of Child Development and Reading Metrics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Number of Public Library Members in the UK. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2014.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Debate: 1st Grade Fate and Library Member Weight

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK from 2003 to 2014. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, our research team explores this peculiar connection. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest that as the number of 1st-grade students in public schools increases, so does the number of public library members in the UK. It seems that the love for learning and literature blossoms early in these young scholars.

Our study provides empirical evidence to support the idea that the enthusiasm for education in young students positively influences library patronage. This correlation sheds light on the importance of nurturing a love for reading from an early age. With these results, we hope to inspire policymakers to consider the impact of early education on public library engagement. As the saying goes, "The early bird gets the worm, and the early reader gets the first pick of books!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Number of Public Library Members in the UK. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Debate: 1st Grade Fate and Library Member Weight

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK from 2003 to 2014. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, our research team explores this peculiar connection. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest that as the number of 1st-grade students in public schools increases, so does the number of public library members in the UK. It seems that the love for learning and literature blossoms early in these young scholars.

Our study provides empirical evidence to support the idea that the enthusiasm for education in young students positively influences library patronage. This correlation sheds light on the importance of nurturing a love for reading from an early age. With these results, we hope to inspire policymakers to consider the impact of early education on public library engagement. As the saying goes, "The early bird gets the worm, and the early reader gets the first pick of books!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between 1st-grade students and public library members has long been a matter of curiosity and intrigue. While some may view this connection as trivial or coincidental, our research endeavors to uncover the underlying factors driving this correlation. One might say we are embarking on a "novel" investigation that aims to shed light on the "plot" between early education and library membership.

It has been observed that an increase in the number of 1st-grade students in public schools is often accompanied by a surge in the number of public library members in the UK. This peculiar relationship has piqued our interest and prompted us to delve into the data with vigor and enthusiasm. It seems that we are not the only ones who find this association "un-put-downable."

As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is essential to ground our study in existing literature. Previous research has hinted at the link between early education and lifelong learning habits, but the specific connection to library membership warrants closer inspection. This investigation seeks to add a new chapter to the academic discourse by confirming and expanding upon previous findings. One might say we are aiming to "check out" the truth behind this correlation and bring it to the forefront of scholarly conversation.

Our analysis draws upon data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, covering the period from 2003 to 2014. By harnessing the power of quantitative analysis, we have endeavored to unravel the mysteries of this relationship and present our findings with precision and rigor. One might even say we are "stacking the shelves" of knowledge with empirical evidence and statistical insights.

As we reveal the results of our investigation, it becomes evident that 1st-grade fate and library member weight are intertwined in ways that defy conventional expectations. The strikingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 leave little room for doubt regarding the robustness of this connection. One might quip that this correlation is as solid as a "bookend."

The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity. They point to the influence of early education on the cultivation of a passion for literature and the enduring significance of public libraries in nurturing this love for learning. Our results illuminate the profound impact of early academic experiences on shaping lifelong habits and attitudes towards intellectual engagement. One might jest that this correlation is a testament to the notion that "reading is fundamental."

In conclusion, our research serves as a compelling addition to the burgeoning body of literature on the interplay between early education and library patronage. By emphasizing the importance of instilling a love for reading at a young age, we hope to kindle a renewed appreciation for the formative years of education and their lasting impact on the cultural landscape. As the idiom goes, "It's never too early to start turning pages."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Number of Public Library Members in the UK. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Debate: 1st Grade Fate and Library Member Weight

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK from 2003 to 2014. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, our research team explores this peculiar connection. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest that as the number of 1st-grade students in public schools increases, so does the number of public library members in the UK. It seems that the love for learning and literature blossoms early in these young scholars.

Our study provides empirical evidence to support the idea that the enthusiasm for education in young students positively influences library patronage. This correlation sheds light on the importance of nurturing a love for reading from an early age. With these results, we hope to inspire policymakers to consider the impact of early education on public library engagement. As the saying goes, "The early bird gets the worm, and the early reader gets the first pick of books!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between 1st-grade students and public library members has long been a matter of curiosity and intrigue. While some may view this connection as trivial or coincidental, our research endeavors to uncover the underlying factors driving this correlation. One might say we are embarking on a "novel" investigation that aims to shed light on the "plot" between early education and library membership.
It has been observed that an increase in the number of 1st-grade students in public schools is often accompanied by a surge in the number of public library members in the UK. This peculiar relationship has piqued our interest and prompted us to delve into the data with vigor and enthusiasm. It seems that we are not the only ones who find this association "un-put-downable."
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is essential to ground our study in existing literature. Previous research has hinted at the link between early education and lifelong learning habits, but the specific connection to library membership warrants closer inspection. This investigation seeks to add a new chapter to the academic discourse by confirming and expanding upon previous findings. One might say we are aiming to "check out" the truth behind this correlation and bring it to the forefront of scholarly conversation.
Our analysis draws upon data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, covering the period from 2003 to 2014. By harnessing the power of quantitative analysis, we have endeavored to unravel the mysteries of this relationship and present our findings with precision and rigor. One might even say we are "stacking the shelves" of knowledge with empirical evidence and statistical insights.
As we reveal the results of our investigation, it becomes evident that 1st-grade fate and library member weight are intertwined in ways that defy conventional expectations. The strikingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 leave little room for doubt regarding the robustness of this connection. One might quip that this correlation is as solid as a "bookend."
The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity. They point to the influence of early education on the cultivation of a passion for literature and the enduring significance of public libraries in nurturing this love for learning. Our results illuminate the profound impact of early academic experiences on shaping lifelong habits and attitudes towards intellectual engagement. One might jest that this correlation is a testament to the notion that "reading is fundamental."
In conclusion, our research serves as a compelling addition to the burgeoning body of literature on the interplay between early education and library patronage. By emphasizing the importance of instilling a love for reading at a young age, we hope to kindle a renewed appreciation for the formative years of education and their lasting impact on the cultural landscape. As the idiom goes, "It's never too early to start turning pages."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between the number of 1st-grade students in public schools and the number of public library members in the UK has intrigued researchers and policymakers alike. In "Smith et al.'s Analysis of Education Trends," the authors note a correlation between early education experiences and future intellectual engagement, providing a solid foundation for our investigation. We were "hooked" by their insights and set out to explore this connection with our own twist.

Digging deeper into the literature, "Doe's Study on Early Learning Behaviors" offers compelling evidence that early exposure to educational environments can shape lifelong habits. This echoes the "storybook" beginning of our research, setting the stage for our own empirical analysis. It's as if the academic community was quietly whispering, "Read between the lines" of these studies, urging us to embark on our own scholarly adventure.

Moving beyond the realms of traditional academia, non-fiction works such as "The Library Book" by Susan Orlean and "Educated" by Tara Westover have underscored the profound impact of libraries and early education on individuals' lives. These real-life narratives added color to our exploration, evoking a sense of wonder akin to discovering a hidden gem on a library shelf.

On a lighter note, fictional accounts like "Matilda" by Roald Dahl and "The Library at Mount Char" by Scott Hawkins have woven tales of young protagonists finding solace and inspiration in libraries, mirroring the themes of our own study. It's almost as if these characters were nudging us and saying, "Don't shelf this idea just yet; it's worth turning the page on."

In a surprising turn of events, games like "Biblios" and "Ex Libris" have entertained us with their thematic connections to libraries and the pursuit of knowledge, adding a playful dimension to our research journey. It's as if the universe conspired to infuse our investigation with a playful spirit, reminding us that even scholarly pursuits can have an element of fun.

In summary, the existing literature and cultural narratives have laid the groundwork for our exploration of the link between 1st-grade student population and public library membership. By integrating serious research, captivating narratives, and playful inspirations, we aim to unveil the underlying chapters of this unconventional correlation. After all, in the world of academia, as in libraries, a good balance of depth and delight can make any story worth reading.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Number of Public Library Members in the UK. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Statista . You used data from 2003 to 2014

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Debate: 1st Grade Fate and Library Member Weight

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK from 2003 to 2014. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, our research team explores this peculiar connection. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest that as the number of 1st-grade students in public schools increases, so does the number of public library members in the UK. It seems that the love for learning and literature blossoms early in these young scholars.

Our study provides empirical evidence to support the idea that the enthusiasm for education in young students positively influences library patronage. This correlation sheds light on the importance of nurturing a love for reading from an early age. With these results, we hope to inspire policymakers to consider the impact of early education on public library engagement. As the saying goes, "The early bird gets the worm, and the early reader gets the first pick of books!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between 1st-grade students and public library members has long been a matter of curiosity and intrigue. While some may view this connection as trivial or coincidental, our research endeavors to uncover the underlying factors driving this correlation. One might say we are embarking on a "novel" investigation that aims to shed light on the "plot" between early education and library membership.
It has been observed that an increase in the number of 1st-grade students in public schools is often accompanied by a surge in the number of public library members in the UK. This peculiar relationship has piqued our interest and prompted us to delve into the data with vigor and enthusiasm. It seems that we are not the only ones who find this association "un-put-downable."
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is essential to ground our study in existing literature. Previous research has hinted at the link between early education and lifelong learning habits, but the specific connection to library membership warrants closer inspection. This investigation seeks to add a new chapter to the academic discourse by confirming and expanding upon previous findings. One might say we are aiming to "check out" the truth behind this correlation and bring it to the forefront of scholarly conversation.
Our analysis draws upon data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, covering the period from 2003 to 2014. By harnessing the power of quantitative analysis, we have endeavored to unravel the mysteries of this relationship and present our findings with precision and rigor. One might even say we are "stacking the shelves" of knowledge with empirical evidence and statistical insights.
As we reveal the results of our investigation, it becomes evident that 1st-grade fate and library member weight are intertwined in ways that defy conventional expectations. The strikingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 leave little room for doubt regarding the robustness of this connection. One might quip that this correlation is as solid as a "bookend."
The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity. They point to the influence of early education on the cultivation of a passion for literature and the enduring significance of public libraries in nurturing this love for learning. Our results illuminate the profound impact of early academic experiences on shaping lifelong habits and attitudes towards intellectual engagement. One might jest that this correlation is a testament to the notion that "reading is fundamental."
In conclusion, our research serves as a compelling addition to the burgeoning body of literature on the interplay between early education and library patronage. By emphasizing the importance of instilling a love for reading at a young age, we hope to kindle a renewed appreciation for the formative years of education and their lasting impact on the cultural landscape. As the idiom goes, "It's never too early to start turning pages."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our research utilized a meticulously curated dataset drawn from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, encompassing the years 2003 to 2014. To embark on this "novel" inquiry, we employed a multifaceted approach that combined elements of statistical analysis, data mining, and a dash of investigative curiosity. One might even say we were "checking out" the data with the precision of a librarian on a mission.

The first step involved collecting data on the number of 1st-grade students in public schools and the corresponding count of public library members in the UK. We carefully combed through online records, teasing out the relevant figures from the seemingly infinite expanse of cyberspace. It was a task akin to navigating the labyrinthine shelves of a library, with each dataset serving as a potential "page-turner" in our quest for knowledge.

Next, we meticulously cleaned and processed the data, ensuring that each datum was devoid of errors or inaccuracies. This stage required an eye for detail that rivaled the scrutinizing gaze of a grammarian proofreading a manuscript. After all, when it comes to statistical analysis, every "i" must be dotted, and every "t" must be crossed.

Once our dataset was polished to a sparkling sheen, we applied a series of sophisticated statistical techniques to unravel the relationship between the number of 1st-grade students and public library members. Through complex regression analyses and correlation assessments, we sought to untangle the "plot" behind this intriguing association. It was akin to solving a riddle where the clues were hidden within the numbers themselves. Or, as one might quip, we were unraveling the statistical "yarn" of this enigmatic correlation.

The final stage of our methodology involved peer review and validation processes to ensure the robustness and integrity of our findings. Just as a masterpiece undergoes scrutiny in the literary world, our statistical analysis was subjected to rigorous examination and cross-verification. This collaborative effort served as a safeguard against statistical inaccuracies and provided the stamp of scholarly approval to our research.

In the end, our methodology represented a harmonious fusion of meticulous data collection, rigorous statistical analysis, and the insatiable curiosity to peel back the layers of this intriguing correlation. As we present our methodology, one might say that our approach was as thorough as a librarian cataloging the shelves, ensuring every book finds its rightful place.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Number of Public Library Members in the UK. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Statista .

For the time period 2003 to 2014, you found a correlation 0.9365667, r-squared of 0.8771572, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Debate: 1st Grade Fate and Library Member Weight

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK from 2003 to 2014. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, our research team explores this peculiar connection. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest that as the number of 1st-grade students in public schools increases, so does the number of public library members in the UK. It seems that the love for learning and literature blossoms early in these young scholars.

Our study provides empirical evidence to support the idea that the enthusiasm for education in young students positively influences library patronage. This correlation sheds light on the importance of nurturing a love for reading from an early age. With these results, we hope to inspire policymakers to consider the impact of early education on public library engagement. As the saying goes, "The early bird gets the worm, and the early reader gets the first pick of books!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between 1st-grade students and public library members has long been a matter of curiosity and intrigue. While some may view this connection as trivial or coincidental, our research endeavors to uncover the underlying factors driving this correlation. One might say we are embarking on a "novel" investigation that aims to shed light on the "plot" between early education and library membership.
It has been observed that an increase in the number of 1st-grade students in public schools is often accompanied by a surge in the number of public library members in the UK. This peculiar relationship has piqued our interest and prompted us to delve into the data with vigor and enthusiasm. It seems that we are not the only ones who find this association "un-put-downable."
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is essential to ground our study in existing literature. Previous research has hinted at the link between early education and lifelong learning habits, but the specific connection to library membership warrants closer inspection. This investigation seeks to add a new chapter to the academic discourse by confirming and expanding upon previous findings. One might say we are aiming to "check out" the truth behind this correlation and bring it to the forefront of scholarly conversation.
Our analysis draws upon data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, covering the period from 2003 to 2014. By harnessing the power of quantitative analysis, we have endeavored to unravel the mysteries of this relationship and present our findings with precision and rigor. One might even say we are "stacking the shelves" of knowledge with empirical evidence and statistical insights.
As we reveal the results of our investigation, it becomes evident that 1st-grade fate and library member weight are intertwined in ways that defy conventional expectations. The strikingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 leave little room for doubt regarding the robustness of this connection. One might quip that this correlation is as solid as a "bookend."
The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity. They point to the influence of early education on the cultivation of a passion for literature and the enduring significance of public libraries in nurturing this love for learning. Our results illuminate the profound impact of early academic experiences on shaping lifelong habits and attitudes towards intellectual engagement. One might jest that this correlation is a testament to the notion that "reading is fundamental."
In conclusion, our research serves as a compelling addition to the burgeoning body of literature on the interplay between early education and library patronage. By emphasizing the importance of instilling a love for reading at a young age, we hope to kindle a renewed appreciation for the formative years of education and their lasting impact on the cultural landscape. As the idiom goes, "It's never too early to start turning pages."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK yielded compelling results. The data revealed a strikingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667, denoting a robust relationship between these two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8771572 further emphasizes the substantial degree to which the number of 1st-grade students influences the count of public library members. One might say this correlation is as clear as "A, B, see."

The obtained p-value of less than 0.01 signifies the statistical significance of the correlation, providing strong evidence to support the notion that as the number of 1st-grade students in public schools increases, so does the number of public library members in the UK. It appears that the early educational experiences of these young scholars have a notable impact on their propensity to engage with public library resources. One might even go so far as to suggest that these findings are truly "book-tastic."

The figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK. This visual representation succinctly captures the salient relationship identified through our quantitative analysis. One might humorously remark that this correlation is as noticeable as a "do-re-me" sequence in a musical score.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Number of Public Library Members in the UK. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Great Debate: 1st Grade Fate and Library Member Weight

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK from 2003 to 2014. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, our research team explores this peculiar connection. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest that as the number of 1st-grade students in public schools increases, so does the number of public library members in the UK. It seems that the love for learning and literature blossoms early in these young scholars.

Our study provides empirical evidence to support the idea that the enthusiasm for education in young students positively influences library patronage. This correlation sheds light on the importance of nurturing a love for reading from an early age. With these results, we hope to inspire policymakers to consider the impact of early education on public library engagement. As the saying goes, "The early bird gets the worm, and the early reader gets the first pick of books!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the number of 1st-grade students in public schools and the number of public library members in the UK has intrigued researchers and policymakers alike. In "Smith et al.'s Analysis of Education Trends," the authors note a correlation between early education experiences and future intellectual engagement, providing a solid foundation for our investigation. We were "hooked" by their insights and set out to explore this connection with our own twist.
Digging deeper into the literature, "Doe's Study on Early Learning Behaviors" offers compelling evidence that early exposure to educational environments can shape lifelong habits. This echoes the "storybook" beginning of our research, setting the stage for our own empirical analysis. It's as if the academic community was quietly whispering, "Read between the lines" of these studies, urging us to embark on our own scholarly adventure.
Moving beyond the realms of traditional academia, non-fiction works such as "The Library Book" by Susan Orlean and "Educated" by Tara Westover have underscored the profound impact of libraries and early education on individuals' lives. These real-life narratives added color to our exploration, evoking a sense of wonder akin to discovering a hidden gem on a library shelf.
On a lighter note, fictional accounts like "Matilda" by Roald Dahl and "The Library at Mount Char" by Scott Hawkins have woven tales of young protagonists finding solace and inspiration in libraries, mirroring the themes of our own study. It's almost as if these characters were nudging us and saying, "Don't shelf this idea just yet; it's worth turning the page on."
In a surprising turn of events, games like "Biblios" and "Ex Libris" have entertained us with their thematic connections to libraries and the pursuit of knowledge, adding a playful dimension to our research journey. It's as if the universe conspired to infuse our investigation with a playful spirit, reminding us that even scholarly pursuits can have an element of fun.
In summary, the existing literature and cultural narratives have laid the groundwork for our exploration of the link between 1st-grade student population and public library membership. By integrating serious research, captivating narratives, and playful inspirations, we aim to unveil the underlying chapters of this unconventional correlation. After all, in the world of academia, as in libraries, a good balance of depth and delight can make any story worth reading.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK yielded compelling results. The data revealed a strikingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667, denoting a robust relationship between these two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8771572 further emphasizes the substantial degree to which the number of 1st-grade students influences the count of public library members. One might say this correlation is as clear as "A, B, see."
The obtained p-value of less than 0.01 signifies the statistical significance of the correlation, providing strong evidence to support the notion that as the number of 1st-grade students in public schools increases, so does the number of public library members in the UK. It appears that the early educational experiences of these young scholars have a notable impact on their propensity to engage with public library resources. One might even go so far as to suggest that these findings are truly "book-tastic."
The figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK. This visual representation succinctly captures the salient relationship identified through our quantitative analysis. One might humorously remark that this correlation is as noticeable as a "do-re-me" sequence in a musical score.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation provide compelling evidence of a substantial positive correlation between the number of 1st-grade students in public schools and the number of public library members in the UK. This intriguing connection aligns with prior research, supporting the notion that early educational experiences significantly influence individuals' engagement with public library resources. It seems that the love for learning and literature truly takes root during these formative years.

Our findings are consistent with Smith et al.'s Analysis of Education Trends, which hinted at the impact of early education experiences on future intellectual engagement. This relationship reinforces the importance of fostering a passion for reading and learning from a tender age. It's as if the academic community is singing in unison, "Teach them well and let them lead the way," echoing the sentiments of Whitney Houston's timeless hit.

In a surprising twist, our results also bolster Doe's Study on Early Learning Behaviors, showcasing how early exposure to educational environments shapes lifelong habits. It's as if these previous studies were nudging us and saying, "You're onto something here, keep flipping those academic pages!"

The strong positive correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value lend weight to the idea that the number of 1st-grade students influences public library membership numbers. It's as if these statistics are whispering, "Count on us to reveal the full story behind this correlation."

The scatterplot vividly illustrates this relationship, serving as a visual testament to the significant impact of early education on library patronage. One could say it paints a clear picture of how these young scholars are writing the first chapters of their lifelong love affair with libraries. It's as if the data itself is saying, "See? It's crystal clear, just like a well-organized library!"

Our study provides a pivotal contribution to the understanding of educational influences on library engagement. The stark correlation between 1st-grade student population and public library membership underscores the need for initiatives to promote early literacy and educational enthusiasm. As the old adage goes, "In the library of life, the first few chapters shape the rest of the narrative."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Number of Public Library Members in the UK. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Great Debate: 1st Grade Fate and Library Member Weight

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK from 2003 to 2014. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, our research team explores this peculiar connection. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest that as the number of 1st-grade students in public schools increases, so does the number of public library members in the UK. It seems that the love for learning and literature blossoms early in these young scholars.

Our study provides empirical evidence to support the idea that the enthusiasm for education in young students positively influences library patronage. This correlation sheds light on the importance of nurturing a love for reading from an early age. With these results, we hope to inspire policymakers to consider the impact of early education on public library engagement. As the saying goes, "The early bird gets the worm, and the early reader gets the first pick of books!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between 1st-grade students and public library members has long been a matter of curiosity and intrigue. While some may view this connection as trivial or coincidental, our research endeavors to uncover the underlying factors driving this correlation. One might say we are embarking on a "novel" investigation that aims to shed light on the "plot" between early education and library membership.
It has been observed that an increase in the number of 1st-grade students in public schools is often accompanied by a surge in the number of public library members in the UK. This peculiar relationship has piqued our interest and prompted us to delve into the data with vigor and enthusiasm. It seems that we are not the only ones who find this association "un-put-downable."
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is essential to ground our study in existing literature. Previous research has hinted at the link between early education and lifelong learning habits, but the specific connection to library membership warrants closer inspection. This investigation seeks to add a new chapter to the academic discourse by confirming and expanding upon previous findings. One might say we are aiming to "check out" the truth behind this correlation and bring it to the forefront of scholarly conversation.
Our analysis draws upon data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, covering the period from 2003 to 2014. By harnessing the power of quantitative analysis, we have endeavored to unravel the mysteries of this relationship and present our findings with precision and rigor. One might even say we are "stacking the shelves" of knowledge with empirical evidence and statistical insights.
As we reveal the results of our investigation, it becomes evident that 1st-grade fate and library member weight are intertwined in ways that defy conventional expectations. The strikingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 leave little room for doubt regarding the robustness of this connection. One might quip that this correlation is as solid as a "bookend."
The implications of our findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity. They point to the influence of early education on the cultivation of a passion for literature and the enduring significance of public libraries in nurturing this love for learning. Our results illuminate the profound impact of early academic experiences on shaping lifelong habits and attitudes towards intellectual engagement. One might jest that this correlation is a testament to the notion that "reading is fundamental."
In conclusion, our research serves as a compelling addition to the burgeoning body of literature on the interplay between early education and library patronage. By emphasizing the importance of instilling a love for reading at a young age, we hope to kindle a renewed appreciation for the formative years of education and their lasting impact on the cultural landscape. As the idiom goes, "It's never too early to start turning pages."

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK yielded compelling results. The data revealed a strikingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667, denoting a robust relationship between these two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8771572 further emphasizes the substantial degree to which the number of 1st-grade students influences the count of public library members. One might say this correlation is as clear as "A, B, see."
The obtained p-value of less than 0.01 signifies the statistical significance of the correlation, providing strong evidence to support the notion that as the number of 1st-grade students in public schools increases, so does the number of public library members in the UK. It appears that the early educational experiences of these young scholars have a notable impact on their propensity to engage with public library resources. One might even go so far as to suggest that these findings are truly "book-tastic."
The figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK. This visual representation succinctly captures the salient relationship identified through our quantitative analysis. One might humorously remark that this correlation is as noticeable as a "do-re-me" sequence in a musical score.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our empirical analysis has definitively established a compelling connection between the number of 1st-grade students in public schools and the count of public library members in the UK. The remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667, coupled with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the substantial influence of early education on library engagement. It appears that the love for literature takes root in these young minds, laying the groundwork for lifelong literary pursuits. One might even say that these findings are a testament to the "profound impact of early education on shaping lifelong habits and attitudes towards intellectual engagement."

Furthermore, our research provides nuanced insights into the interplay between educational milestones and societal literacy. It elucidates the pivotal role of public libraries in fostering a culture of learning, particularly among budding scholars in their formative years. One might jest that these results underscore the "early bird" advantage of instilling a passion for reading in the tender hearts of 1st-grade students.

In light of these findings, it is abundantly clear that policymakers and educators alike should heed the implications of our research. Encouraging early literacy initiatives and library engagement can sow the seeds for a more intellectually vibrant society. As the old adage goes, "The early reader catches the curiosity bug."

In summation, with our study, we have penned a new chapter in the tale of educational influence on library membership. The evidence presented leaves little room for skepticism and advances our understanding of the early determinants of literary enthusiasm and intellectual curiosity. It appears that the "plot" between 1st-grade fate and library member weight is a narrative worth exploring further. However, no further research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Great Debate: 1st Grade Fate and Library Member Weight. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Child Development and Reading Metrics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Great Debate: 1st Grade Fate and Library Member Weight. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Wacky Research Society


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Great Debate: 1st Grade Fate and Library Member Weight with an abstract of This paper investigates the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and the number of public library members in the UK from 2003 to 2014. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Statista, our research team explores this peculiar connection. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9365667 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest that as the number of 1st-grade students in public schools increases, so does the number of public library members in the UK. It seems that the love for learning and literature blossoms early in these young scholars.
Our study provides empirical evidence to support the idea that the enthusiasm for education in young students positively influences library patronage. This correlation sheds light on the importance of nurturing a love for reading from an early age. With these results, we hope to inspire policymakers to consider the impact of early education on public library engagement. As the saying goes, "The early bird gets the worm, and the early reader gets the first pick of books!

ChatGPT:

1st grade students, public school, public library, UK, education, library patronage, early education, reading enthusiasm, National Center for Education Statistics, Statista, library engagement, early learning, library members, student population

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Number of public school students in 1st grade
Detailed data title: 1st grade enrollment in public elementary and secondary schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Number of public school students in 1st grade

Number of Public Library Members in the UK
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Number of Public Library Members in the UK

Correlation r = 0.9365667 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8771572 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of Public Library Members in the UK) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of public school students in 1st grade) over the 12 years from 2003 through 2014.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.3E-6. 0.0000072670817649502570000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.00073% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 137,607 random variables You don't actually need 137 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.78, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
Number of public school students in 1st grade (Students)361251036630003690850375114037500703708480372877037539503772640382360038848203863490
Number of Public Library Members in the UK (Members)592300005957000059860000602100006059000060970000613800006179000062260000632200006370000064100000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3612510,3663000,3690850,3751140,3750070,3708480,3728770,3753950,3772640,3823600,3884820,3863490,])
array_2 = np.array([59230000,59570000,59860000,60210000,60590000,60970000,61380000,61790000,62260000,63220000,63700000,64100000,])
array_1_name = "Number of public school students in 1st grade"
array_2_name = "Number of Public Library Members in the UK"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 2834 · Black Variable ID: 1298 · Red Variable ID: 468
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0