about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,762 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Boise City and the second variable is Google searches for 'n95 mask'.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air pollution in Boise City increased, it became apparent that the only way to properly enjoy the local 'Smoked Potato' festival was to wear an n95 mask. As a result, the demand for n95 masks skyrocketed as residents realized they needed to protect themselves not only from the pollution, but also from accidentally inhaling any stray bits of smoked potato.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting the hazy sky over Boise City filled with smog. People are walking around wearing their n95 masks, and the city skyline is barely visible through the thick pollution. Some individuals are seen searching for n95 masks on their smartphones. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Boise City and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Parallax art A Discovery magazine cover image Sci-fi fantacy A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Boise City and Google searches for 'n95 mask', in the following situation: Increased air pollution in Boise City led to a surge in Google searches for n95 masks as residents discovered their new daily fashion statement: the Smog Shield.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The hazy sky over Boise City is filled with smog, as people walk around wearing their n95 masks. The city skyline is barely visible through the thick pollution, and people are seen searching for n95 masks on their smartphones.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: The hazy sky over Boise City is filled with smog, as people walk around wearing their n95 masks. The city skyline is barely visible through the thick pollution, and people are seen searching for n95 masks on their smartphones. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting the hazy sky over Boise City filled with smog. People are walking around wearing their n95 masks, and the city skyline is barely visible through the thick pollution. Some individuals are seen searching for n95 masks on their smartphones.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Boise City positively influenced n95 mask (Google searches for 'n95 mask').

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Masking the Effects: Air Pollution and the Search for N95 Masks in Boise City

Journal of Environmental Gadgets and Gizmos

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Boise City and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8301411 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Masking the Effects: Air Pollution and the Search for N95 Masks in Boise City"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on the potential impact of air pollution on public awareness and concern regarding respiratory protection. The findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8301411 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022, suggesting a strong association between air quality and the public's interest in acquiring N95 masks. Our study provides valuable insights into the intersection of environmental factors and consumer behavior, highlighting the importance of respiratory health in the face of airborne hazards.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Boise City and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Masking the Effects: Air Pollution and the Search for N95 Masks in Boise City"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on the potential impact of air pollution on public awareness and concern regarding respiratory protection. The findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8301411 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022, suggesting a strong association between air quality and the public's interest in acquiring N95 masks. Our study provides valuable insights into the intersection of environmental factors and consumer behavior, highlighting the importance of respiratory health in the face of airborne hazards.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

In recent years, the issue of air pollution has become a pressing concern for many urban areas, including Boise City. As pollutants waft through the atmosphere on their insidious mission to wreak havoc, the populace is left grappling with the challenge of safeguarding their respiratory well-being. Enter the N95 mask, the unsung hero of airborne defense – more sought after than a golden ticket in a chocolate bar. Our study boldly ventures into the realm where pollution meets public behavior, aiming to peel back the layers of this murky relationship and reveal the truth behind the swirling haze of anecdotal suspicions.

Boise City, affectionately referred to as the City of Trees, presents a unique landscape for our investigation. It beckons with its panoramic foothills and breezy rivers, and yet, these very elements may conspire to trap air pollution, leaving the unsuspecting denizens in a tender embrace with smog and particulate matter. It is in this atmospheric dance of odors and airborne particles that we aim to discern the telltale signs of public concern, mirrored in the virtual voyages of Google searches for N95 masks.

The enigmatic allure of the N95 mask lies not only in its protective promise but also in its sartorial mystique. Armed with this ocular accessory, one transforms into a steampunk superhero ready to take on the perils of microscopic assailants – a true fusion of fashion and functionality. But beneath this whimsical façade lies a serious undercurrent of public health consciousness, a silent plea for clarity amidst the fog of airborne uncertainty.

The hum of air quality monitors and the clatter of keyboard strokes on Google search bars converge in our exploration, calling to mind the age-old adage – "Where there's smoke, there's fire; and where there's fire, there's Google searches for N95 masks." With this intriguing confluence echoing through the annals of cyberspace and laboratory chambers alike, we embark on an empirical quest to untangle the web of air pollution and public preoccupation, striving to decode the unsung symphony of airborne perils and protective measures. The findings of our study promise to shed light on the shadowy contours of public awareness, hinting at a future where respiratory protection blends seamlessly with everyday consciousness and perhaps even fashion sensibilities.

This quest beckons us to embark on a journey of discovery, where the forces of nature meet the intrepid spirit of human curiosity. As we tread this path, we remain mindful of the gravity of our undertaking, with a hint of whimsy and the electric charge of anticipation that accompanies all forays into the unknown. So, with our gaze trained on the distant horizon and our analytical tools at the ready, let us delve into the crossroads of air pollution and the pursuit of N95 masks, to uncover the hidden threads that bind these seemingly disparate realms.

Join us as we venture forth into the labyrinthine realm of environmental impact and public response, where no stone, moss-covered or otherwise, shall be left unturned. For it is here, where the dance of air pollution and public concern unfolds, that the real magic lies. And perhaps, just perhaps, a snazzy N95-mask-themed masquerade ball awaits us at the end of this scholarly odyssey – one where the knights come in particulate-filter-lined armor, and the damsels are all elegantly veiled in the finest N95 couture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Boise City and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Masking the Effects: Air Pollution and the Search for N95 Masks in Boise City"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on the potential impact of air pollution on public awareness and concern regarding respiratory protection. The findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8301411 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022, suggesting a strong association between air quality and the public's interest in acquiring N95 masks. Our study provides valuable insights into the intersection of environmental factors and consumer behavior, highlighting the importance of respiratory health in the face of airborne hazards.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
In recent years, the issue of air pollution has become a pressing concern for many urban areas, including Boise City. As pollutants waft through the atmosphere on their insidious mission to wreak havoc, the populace is left grappling with the challenge of safeguarding their respiratory well-being. Enter the N95 mask, the unsung hero of airborne defense – more sought after than a golden ticket in a chocolate bar. Our study boldly ventures into the realm where pollution meets public behavior, aiming to peel back the layers of this murky relationship and reveal the truth behind the swirling haze of anecdotal suspicions.
Boise City, affectionately referred to as the City of Trees, presents a unique landscape for our investigation. It beckons with its panoramic foothills and breezy rivers, and yet, these very elements may conspire to trap air pollution, leaving the unsuspecting denizens in a tender embrace with smog and particulate matter. It is in this atmospheric dance of odors and airborne particles that we aim to discern the telltale signs of public concern, mirrored in the virtual voyages of Google searches for N95 masks.
The enigmatic allure of the N95 mask lies not only in its protective promise but also in its sartorial mystique. Armed with this ocular accessory, one transforms into a steampunk superhero ready to take on the perils of microscopic assailants – a true fusion of fashion and functionality. But beneath this whimsical façade lies a serious undercurrent of public health consciousness, a silent plea for clarity amidst the fog of airborne uncertainty.
The hum of air quality monitors and the clatter of keyboard strokes on Google search bars converge in our exploration, calling to mind the age-old adage – "Where there's smoke, there's fire; and where there's fire, there's Google searches for N95 masks." With this intriguing confluence echoing through the annals of cyberspace and laboratory chambers alike, we embark on an empirical quest to untangle the web of air pollution and public preoccupation, striving to decode the unsung symphony of airborne perils and protective measures. The findings of our study promise to shed light on the shadowy contours of public awareness, hinting at a future where respiratory protection blends seamlessly with everyday consciousness and perhaps even fashion sensibilities.
This quest beckons us to embark on a journey of discovery, where the forces of nature meet the intrepid spirit of human curiosity. As we tread this path, we remain mindful of the gravity of our undertaking, with a hint of whimsy and the electric charge of anticipation that accompanies all forays into the unknown. So, with our gaze trained on the distant horizon and our analytical tools at the ready, let us delve into the crossroads of air pollution and the pursuit of N95 masks, to uncover the hidden threads that bind these seemingly disparate realms.
Join us as we venture forth into the labyrinthine realm of environmental impact and public response, where no stone, moss-covered or otherwise, shall be left unturned. For it is here, where the dance of air pollution and public concern unfolds, that the real magic lies. And perhaps, just perhaps, a snazzy N95-mask-themed masquerade ball awaits us at the end of this scholarly odyssey – one where the knights come in particulate-filter-lined armor, and the damsels are all elegantly veiled in the finest N95 couture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Doe (2015) initially delved into the perplexing realm of public response to air pollution, sparking a wave of scholarly interest in the dynamics of environmental concern. Their findings, though commendable, lacked the whimsical flair and sartorial mystique that envelop the saga of N95 masks. Undeterred, subsequent studies by Jones et al. (2018) and Patel and Lee (2020) extended the conversation, shedding light on the perils of airborne particulate matter and its impact on respiratory health. However, the allure of the N95 mask – a veritable superhero of respiratory defense – remained conspicuously absent from their solemn deliberations.

Transitioning from the weighty to the winsome, we encounter "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Study of Urban Respiratory Challenges" by Dr. Aidan Breathes and Dr. Wendy Wheeze. This seminal work, with its somber undertones and earnest exhalations, outlines the trials and tribulations of city dwellers grappling with airborne adversaries. In contrast, "Dust and Deception: A Tale of Respiratory Resilience" by Amanda Lungstrength presents a fictional odyssey through the treacherous terrain of polluted air, casting the N95 mask as a gallant companion on the protagonist's quest for clean breath amidst the dusty deluge.

Turning to more lighthearted literary musings, the fictional saga "The Mask of Zorro" by Alejandro del Toro captivates readers with its swashbuckling escapades, albeit with a conspicuous absence of N95-clad champions. Similarly, "Masks and Mucus: An Epic of Emission-Evading Adventures" by Penelope Particulate immerses its audience in a fanciful whirlwind of airborne antics and whimsical witticisms, albeit devoid of empirical data or correlation coefficients.

Taking a brief cinematic interlude, the cinematic masterpiece "Gone with the Smog" offers a poignant yet tangential portrayal of environmental turmoil, reminiscent of the swirling haze that envelops our scholarly pursuits. In a similar vein, "The Mask of the Red Death" beckons with its enigmatic title, tantalizingly hinting at a discordant dance of epidemic intrigue and protective enigmas, even if unrelated to the topic at hand.

EMPIRICAL_STUDY_42 by Dr. Amelia Airborne, an obscure but crucial contribution to this literature, surreptitiously advances the understanding of the relationship between air pollution and public searches for N95 masks, concealed within its unassuming title and elusive accessibility. This covert gem, with its clandestine nuances and clandestine charm, fuels the flickering flames of our inquiry, akin to a cryptic treasure map leading to scholarly revelation.

Venturing into this tumultuous menagerie of research and creative reflections, we are reminded of the multifaceted spectrum of human response to environmental perils – a peculiar symphony, where the bass of scientific rigor harmonizes with the piquant treble of literary imagination. In the unassuming cobwebbed corners of this academic ball, it is our ardent hope to uncover the elusive threads that bind air pollution and the quest for N95 masks, unraveling the grand tapestry of public consciousness in the face of airborne challenges. So, onward we press, driven by the tantalizing prospect of unmasking the subtle interplay between pollution and public interest, with a dash of humor and a hearty dollop of scholarly zeal.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Boise City and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2005 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Masking the Effects: Air Pollution and the Search for N95 Masks in Boise City"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on the potential impact of air pollution on public awareness and concern regarding respiratory protection. The findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8301411 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022, suggesting a strong association between air quality and the public's interest in acquiring N95 masks. Our study provides valuable insights into the intersection of environmental factors and consumer behavior, highlighting the importance of respiratory health in the face of airborne hazards.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
In recent years, the issue of air pollution has become a pressing concern for many urban areas, including Boise City. As pollutants waft through the atmosphere on their insidious mission to wreak havoc, the populace is left grappling with the challenge of safeguarding their respiratory well-being. Enter the N95 mask, the unsung hero of airborne defense – more sought after than a golden ticket in a chocolate bar. Our study boldly ventures into the realm where pollution meets public behavior, aiming to peel back the layers of this murky relationship and reveal the truth behind the swirling haze of anecdotal suspicions.
Boise City, affectionately referred to as the City of Trees, presents a unique landscape for our investigation. It beckons with its panoramic foothills and breezy rivers, and yet, these very elements may conspire to trap air pollution, leaving the unsuspecting denizens in a tender embrace with smog and particulate matter. It is in this atmospheric dance of odors and airborne particles that we aim to discern the telltale signs of public concern, mirrored in the virtual voyages of Google searches for N95 masks.
The enigmatic allure of the N95 mask lies not only in its protective promise but also in its sartorial mystique. Armed with this ocular accessory, one transforms into a steampunk superhero ready to take on the perils of microscopic assailants – a true fusion of fashion and functionality. But beneath this whimsical façade lies a serious undercurrent of public health consciousness, a silent plea for clarity amidst the fog of airborne uncertainty.
The hum of air quality monitors and the clatter of keyboard strokes on Google search bars converge in our exploration, calling to mind the age-old adage – "Where there's smoke, there's fire; and where there's fire, there's Google searches for N95 masks." With this intriguing confluence echoing through the annals of cyberspace and laboratory chambers alike, we embark on an empirical quest to untangle the web of air pollution and public preoccupation, striving to decode the unsung symphony of airborne perils and protective measures. The findings of our study promise to shed light on the shadowy contours of public awareness, hinting at a future where respiratory protection blends seamlessly with everyday consciousness and perhaps even fashion sensibilities.
This quest beckons us to embark on a journey of discovery, where the forces of nature meet the intrepid spirit of human curiosity. As we tread this path, we remain mindful of the gravity of our undertaking, with a hint of whimsy and the electric charge of anticipation that accompanies all forays into the unknown. So, with our gaze trained on the distant horizon and our analytical tools at the ready, let us delve into the crossroads of air pollution and the pursuit of N95 masks, to uncover the hidden threads that bind these seemingly disparate realms.
Join us as we venture forth into the labyrinthine realm of environmental impact and public response, where no stone, moss-covered or otherwise, shall be left unturned. For it is here, where the dance of air pollution and public concern unfolds, that the real magic lies. And perhaps, just perhaps, a snazzy N95-mask-themed masquerade ball awaits us at the end of this scholarly odyssey – one where the knights come in particulate-filter-lined armor, and the damsels are all elegantly veiled in the finest N95 couture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Collection
The data for this study was collected from various sources, with a special focus on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Google Trends. The EPA provided comprehensive air quality measurements for the Boise City area from 2005 to 2022, covering a wide spectrum of pollutants including particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, carbon monoxide, and sulfur dioxide. This trove of atmospheric data offered a rich tapestry of pollutants, akin to an artistic smorgasbord for the discerning connoisseur of air quality.

Google Trends, on the other hand, served as the virtual oracle through which we gauged public interest and concern for respiratory protection. The frequency of 'n95 mask' searches on the ubiquitous search engine was tracked, offering a digital barometer of the ebb and flow of public anxiety amidst the invisible menace of air pollution.

Statistical Analysis
To investigate the potential relationship between air pollution levels and Google searches for 'n95 mask', statistical analysis was conducted with the rigor of a squirrel hoarding nuts for the winter. Correlation coefficients were calculated to measure the strength and direction of the association between air pollutant levels and the frequency of 'n95 mask' searches. Additionally, p-values were employed to assess the statistical significance of the observed associations, akin to a truth serum for data relationships.

The data on air pollution and Google searches were subjected to time series analysis, allowing us to unravel the temporal dynamics of this delicate dance between atmospheric impurities and public paranoia. This approach enabled us to capture the nuances of how air pollution levels influenced the virtual collective consciousness, an endeavor akin to chasing ephemeral whispers in the winds of data.

Quality Control Measures
To ensure the robustness of our findings, stringent quality control measures were implemented. The validity of air quality data from the EPA was scrutinized with the skepticism of a detective interrogating a suspect, ensuring that only the most reliable measurements found their way into our analytical crucible. Similarly, the 'n95 mask' searches on Google Trends were meticulously sifted through, discarding any noise or spurious fluctuations that might have led us down the rabbit hole of false correlations.

Ethical Considerations
The utilization of publicly available data from the EPA and Google Trends abided by the highest standards of ethical research conduct. No virtual trespassing or digital peeping tomfoolery was committed in the acquisition of our data, as we faithfully adhered to the tenets of ethical data harvesting, treating each bit and byte with the respect it deserved.

Limitations
It is important to acknowledge the limitations of this study, much like a daredevil acknowledging the perils of a high-wire act. While the use of air quality data from the EPA and 'n95 mask' search data from Google Trends offered a robust foundation for our investigation, other potential factors influencing public interest in respiratory protection were not directly explored. Furthermore, the influence of external events or media coverage on 'n95 mask' searches was not specifically addressed, leaving a tantalizing question mark hovering overhead, much like a zeppelin in the skies of uncertainty.

In conclusion, the methodological approach adopted in this study combined the precision of a surgeon’s scalpel with the intrigue of a detective’s magnifying glass, offering a panoramic view of the interplay between air pollution and public inquiries for N95 masks. The next section will outline the scintillating results of our analyses, shedding light on the clandestine relationship between air quality and the scramble for respiratory fortification.

---
I hope you like it ! Let me know if you would like me to continue with the results and discussion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Boise City and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2005 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8301411, r-squared of 0.6891342, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Masking the Effects: Air Pollution and the Search for N95 Masks in Boise City"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on the potential impact of air pollution on public awareness and concern regarding respiratory protection. The findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8301411 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022, suggesting a strong association between air quality and the public's interest in acquiring N95 masks. Our study provides valuable insights into the intersection of environmental factors and consumer behavior, highlighting the importance of respiratory health in the face of airborne hazards.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
In recent years, the issue of air pollution has become a pressing concern for many urban areas, including Boise City. As pollutants waft through the atmosphere on their insidious mission to wreak havoc, the populace is left grappling with the challenge of safeguarding their respiratory well-being. Enter the N95 mask, the unsung hero of airborne defense – more sought after than a golden ticket in a chocolate bar. Our study boldly ventures into the realm where pollution meets public behavior, aiming to peel back the layers of this murky relationship and reveal the truth behind the swirling haze of anecdotal suspicions.
Boise City, affectionately referred to as the City of Trees, presents a unique landscape for our investigation. It beckons with its panoramic foothills and breezy rivers, and yet, these very elements may conspire to trap air pollution, leaving the unsuspecting denizens in a tender embrace with smog and particulate matter. It is in this atmospheric dance of odors and airborne particles that we aim to discern the telltale signs of public concern, mirrored in the virtual voyages of Google searches for N95 masks.
The enigmatic allure of the N95 mask lies not only in its protective promise but also in its sartorial mystique. Armed with this ocular accessory, one transforms into a steampunk superhero ready to take on the perils of microscopic assailants – a true fusion of fashion and functionality. But beneath this whimsical façade lies a serious undercurrent of public health consciousness, a silent plea for clarity amidst the fog of airborne uncertainty.
The hum of air quality monitors and the clatter of keyboard strokes on Google search bars converge in our exploration, calling to mind the age-old adage – "Where there's smoke, there's fire; and where there's fire, there's Google searches for N95 masks." With this intriguing confluence echoing through the annals of cyberspace and laboratory chambers alike, we embark on an empirical quest to untangle the web of air pollution and public preoccupation, striving to decode the unsung symphony of airborne perils and protective measures. The findings of our study promise to shed light on the shadowy contours of public awareness, hinting at a future where respiratory protection blends seamlessly with everyday consciousness and perhaps even fashion sensibilities.
This quest beckons us to embark on a journey of discovery, where the forces of nature meet the intrepid spirit of human curiosity. As we tread this path, we remain mindful of the gravity of our undertaking, with a hint of whimsy and the electric charge of anticipation that accompanies all forays into the unknown. So, with our gaze trained on the distant horizon and our analytical tools at the ready, let us delve into the crossroads of air pollution and the pursuit of N95 masks, to uncover the hidden threads that bind these seemingly disparate realms.
Join us as we venture forth into the labyrinthine realm of environmental impact and public response, where no stone, moss-covered or otherwise, shall be left unturned. For it is here, where the dance of air pollution and public concern unfolds, that the real magic lies. And perhaps, just perhaps, a snazzy N95-mask-themed masquerade ball awaits us at the end of this scholarly odyssey – one where the knights come in particulate-filter-lined armor, and the damsels are all elegantly veiled in the finest N95 couture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

RESULTS

The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends revealed a robust correlation between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask'. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8301411, with an r-squared value of 0.6891342, both of which were statistically significant at p < 0.01.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive relationship between air pollution and the public's interest in acquiring N95 masks. This finding underscores the substantial impact of air quality on the collective consciousness, as reflected in the virtual quest for respiratory protection.

The observed correlation highlights the resonance of environmental factors with public behavior and the increasing awareness of respiratory health in response to airborne hazards. Our results lend support to the notion that air pollution exerts a discernible influence on the public's engagement with protective measures, transcending the domain of environmental science to intertwine with consumer behavior. This insight serves as a reminder that the air we breathe not only shapes our physical well-being but also impinges on societal consciousness in unexpected ways.

The depth and significance of the relationship unveiled in this study portray a novel amalgamation of environmental impact and public response, casting a spotlight on the intricate dynamics that underpin the quest for respiratory protection. These findings hold implications for public health policies and interventions, urging a closer examination of the interplay between air quality and public awareness as a pivotal aspect of mitigating the impact of air pollution.

In conclusion, the palpable correlation between air pollution in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask' underscores the far-reaching reverberations of environmental factors on public consciousness. This alignment of environmental concerns with consumer behavior speaks to the subtle yet profound ways in which the unseen perils of air pollution permeate everyday choices and shape societal priorities. The empirical evidence presented in this study underscores the intertwined nature of environmental impact and public awareness, revealing new dimensions in the landscape of respiratory health and the unmasking of public response to airborne hazards.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Boise City and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Masking the Effects: Air Pollution and the Search for N95 Masks in Boise City"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on the potential impact of air pollution on public awareness and concern regarding respiratory protection. The findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8301411 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022, suggesting a strong association between air quality and the public's interest in acquiring N95 masks. Our study provides valuable insights into the intersection of environmental factors and consumer behavior, highlighting the importance of respiratory health in the face of airborne hazards.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2015) initially delved into the perplexing realm of public response to air pollution, sparking a wave of scholarly interest in the dynamics of environmental concern. Their findings, though commendable, lacked the whimsical flair and sartorial mystique that envelop the saga of N95 masks. Undeterred, subsequent studies by Jones et al. (2018) and Patel and Lee (2020) extended the conversation, shedding light on the perils of airborne particulate matter and its impact on respiratory health. However, the allure of the N95 mask – a veritable superhero of respiratory defense – remained conspicuously absent from their solemn deliberations.
Transitioning from the weighty to the winsome, we encounter "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Study of Urban Respiratory Challenges" by Dr. Aidan Breathes and Dr. Wendy Wheeze. This seminal work, with its somber undertones and earnest exhalations, outlines the trials and tribulations of city dwellers grappling with airborne adversaries. In contrast, "Dust and Deception: A Tale of Respiratory Resilience" by Amanda Lungstrength presents a fictional odyssey through the treacherous terrain of polluted air, casting the N95 mask as a gallant companion on the protagonist's quest for clean breath amidst the dusty deluge.
Turning to more lighthearted literary musings, the fictional saga "The Mask of Zorro" by Alejandro del Toro captivates readers with its swashbuckling escapades, albeit with a conspicuous absence of N95-clad champions. Similarly, "Masks and Mucus: An Epic of Emission-Evading Adventures" by Penelope Particulate immerses its audience in a fanciful whirlwind of airborne antics and whimsical witticisms, albeit devoid of empirical data or correlation coefficients.
Taking a brief cinematic interlude, the cinematic masterpiece "Gone with the Smog" offers a poignant yet tangential portrayal of environmental turmoil, reminiscent of the swirling haze that envelops our scholarly pursuits. In a similar vein, "The Mask of the Red Death" beckons with its enigmatic title, tantalizingly hinting at a discordant dance of epidemic intrigue and protective enigmas, even if unrelated to the topic at hand.
EMPIRICAL_STUDY_42 by Dr. Amelia Airborne, an obscure but crucial contribution to this literature, surreptitiously advances the understanding of the relationship between air pollution and public searches for N95 masks, concealed within its unassuming title and elusive accessibility. This covert gem, with its clandestine nuances and clandestine charm, fuels the flickering flames of our inquiry, akin to a cryptic treasure map leading to scholarly revelation.
Venturing into this tumultuous menagerie of research and creative reflections, we are reminded of the multifaceted spectrum of human response to environmental perils – a peculiar symphony, where the bass of scientific rigor harmonizes with the piquant treble of literary imagination. In the unassuming cobwebbed corners of this academic ball, it is our ardent hope to uncover the elusive threads that bind air pollution and the quest for N95 masks, unraveling the grand tapestry of public consciousness in the face of airborne challenges. So, onward we press, driven by the tantalizing prospect of unmasking the subtle interplay between pollution and public interest, with a dash of humor and a hearty dollop of scholarly zeal.


[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends revealed a robust correlation between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask'. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8301411, with an r-squared value of 0.6891342, both of which were statistically significant at p < 0.01.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive relationship between air pollution and the public's interest in acquiring N95 masks. This finding underscores the substantial impact of air quality on the collective consciousness, as reflected in the virtual quest for respiratory protection.
The observed correlation highlights the resonance of environmental factors with public behavior and the increasing awareness of respiratory health in response to airborne hazards. Our results lend support to the notion that air pollution exerts a discernible influence on the public's engagement with protective measures, transcending the domain of environmental science to intertwine with consumer behavior. This insight serves as a reminder that the air we breathe not only shapes our physical well-being but also impinges on societal consciousness in unexpected ways.
The depth and significance of the relationship unveiled in this study portray a novel amalgamation of environmental impact and public response, casting a spotlight on the intricate dynamics that underpin the quest for respiratory protection. These findings hold implications for public health policies and interventions, urging a closer examination of the interplay between air quality and public awareness as a pivotal aspect of mitigating the impact of air pollution.
In conclusion, the palpable correlation between air pollution in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask' underscores the far-reaching reverberations of environmental factors on public consciousness. This alignment of environmental concerns with consumer behavior speaks to the subtle yet profound ways in which the unseen perils of air pollution permeate everyday choices and shape societal priorities. The empirical evidence presented in this study underscores the intertwined nature of environmental impact and public awareness, revealing new dimensions in the landscape of respiratory health and the unmasking of public response to airborne hazards.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study uncover a compelling relationship between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask', shedding light on the intersection of environmental concerns and public awareness. These results not only affirm previous research but also open new avenues for understanding the confluence of environmental impact and consumer behavior.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8301411 unearthed in our study resonates with the prior scholarly discourse on public response to air pollution. In particular, the fictional odyssey "Dust and Deception: A Tale of Respiratory Resilience" by Amanda Lungstrength – though whimsical in nature – inadvertently echoed the tangible impact of airborne perils on public consciousness. While the saga may have been a flight of fancy, our research underscores the gravity of the parallels drawn between the protagonist's quest for clean breath and the public's virtual quest for respiratory protection.

Furthermore, the cinematic masterpiece "Gone with the Smog," with its poignant portrayal of environmental turmoil, tangentially mirrors the swirling haze of scholarly pursuits in our investigation. The allusion to the film serves as a whimsical reminder of the interconnectedness between artistic renditions and scientific inquiry, intertwining the somber notes of environmental adversity with the lighthearted quirks of popular culture – a melodic interplay mirrored in our empirical findings.

The statistically significant correlation unveiled in our study not only bolsters the scholarly foundations laid by Dr. Smith and Dr. Doe but also reinforces the saliency of respiratory health in the face of airborne perils, a concern that has long been overlooked in the dense fog of environmental policy debates. Our research advances the understanding of public response to air pollution, spotlighting the unsung hero – the N95 mask – in the collective consciousness of urban denizens, analogous to a caped crusader swooping in to safeguard respiratory well-being amidst the atmospheric malaise.

In essence, our study imparts a scholarly wink to the captivating narratives of environmental challenges and protective enigmas, underscoring the unexpected resonance of public interest in the face of airborne hazards. The unmasking of the subtle interplay between air pollution and the quest for N95 masks serves as a testament to the multidimensional impact of environmental factors on societal consciousness, infusing a dash of scholarly zeal and a hearty dollop of empirical evidence into the whimsical tapestry of public response to respiratory health.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Boise City and Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Masking the Effects: Air Pollution and the Search for N95 Masks in Boise City"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on the potential impact of air pollution on public awareness and concern regarding respiratory protection. The findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8301411 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022, suggesting a strong association between air quality and the public's interest in acquiring N95 masks. Our study provides valuable insights into the intersection of environmental factors and consumer behavior, highlighting the importance of respiratory health in the face of airborne hazards.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
In recent years, the issue of air pollution has become a pressing concern for many urban areas, including Boise City. As pollutants waft through the atmosphere on their insidious mission to wreak havoc, the populace is left grappling with the challenge of safeguarding their respiratory well-being. Enter the N95 mask, the unsung hero of airborne defense – more sought after than a golden ticket in a chocolate bar. Our study boldly ventures into the realm where pollution meets public behavior, aiming to peel back the layers of this murky relationship and reveal the truth behind the swirling haze of anecdotal suspicions.
Boise City, affectionately referred to as the City of Trees, presents a unique landscape for our investigation. It beckons with its panoramic foothills and breezy rivers, and yet, these very elements may conspire to trap air pollution, leaving the unsuspecting denizens in a tender embrace with smog and particulate matter. It is in this atmospheric dance of odors and airborne particles that we aim to discern the telltale signs of public concern, mirrored in the virtual voyages of Google searches for N95 masks.
The enigmatic allure of the N95 mask lies not only in its protective promise but also in its sartorial mystique. Armed with this ocular accessory, one transforms into a steampunk superhero ready to take on the perils of microscopic assailants – a true fusion of fashion and functionality. But beneath this whimsical façade lies a serious undercurrent of public health consciousness, a silent plea for clarity amidst the fog of airborne uncertainty.
The hum of air quality monitors and the clatter of keyboard strokes on Google search bars converge in our exploration, calling to mind the age-old adage – "Where there's smoke, there's fire; and where there's fire, there's Google searches for N95 masks." With this intriguing confluence echoing through the annals of cyberspace and laboratory chambers alike, we embark on an empirical quest to untangle the web of air pollution and public preoccupation, striving to decode the unsung symphony of airborne perils and protective measures. The findings of our study promise to shed light on the shadowy contours of public awareness, hinting at a future where respiratory protection blends seamlessly with everyday consciousness and perhaps even fashion sensibilities.
This quest beckons us to embark on a journey of discovery, where the forces of nature meet the intrepid spirit of human curiosity. As we tread this path, we remain mindful of the gravity of our undertaking, with a hint of whimsy and the electric charge of anticipation that accompanies all forays into the unknown. So, with our gaze trained on the distant horizon and our analytical tools at the ready, let us delve into the crossroads of air pollution and the pursuit of N95 masks, to uncover the hidden threads that bind these seemingly disparate realms.
Join us as we venture forth into the labyrinthine realm of environmental impact and public response, where no stone, moss-covered or otherwise, shall be left unturned. For it is here, where the dance of air pollution and public concern unfolds, that the real magic lies. And perhaps, just perhaps, a snazzy N95-mask-themed masquerade ball awaits us at the end of this scholarly odyssey – one where the knights come in particulate-filter-lined armor, and the damsels are all elegantly veiled in the finest N95 couture.

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends revealed a robust correlation between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask'. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.8301411, with an r-squared value of 0.6891342, both of which were statistically significant at p < 0.01.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive relationship between air pollution and the public's interest in acquiring N95 masks. This finding underscores the substantial impact of air quality on the collective consciousness, as reflected in the virtual quest for respiratory protection.
The observed correlation highlights the resonance of environmental factors with public behavior and the increasing awareness of respiratory health in response to airborne hazards. Our results lend support to the notion that air pollution exerts a discernible influence on the public's engagement with protective measures, transcending the domain of environmental science to intertwine with consumer behavior. This insight serves as a reminder that the air we breathe not only shapes our physical well-being but also impinges on societal consciousness in unexpected ways.
The depth and significance of the relationship unveiled in this study portray a novel amalgamation of environmental impact and public response, casting a spotlight on the intricate dynamics that underpin the quest for respiratory protection. These findings hold implications for public health policies and interventions, urging a closer examination of the interplay between air quality and public awareness as a pivotal aspect of mitigating the impact of air pollution.
In conclusion, the palpable correlation between air pollution in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask' underscores the far-reaching reverberations of environmental factors on public consciousness. This alignment of environmental concerns with consumer behavior speaks to the subtle yet profound ways in which the unseen perils of air pollution permeate everyday choices and shape societal priorities. The empirical evidence presented in this study underscores the intertwined nature of environmental impact and public awareness, revealing new dimensions in the landscape of respiratory health and the unmasking of public response to airborne hazards.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In the pursuit of untangling the enigmatic relationship between air pollution and the public's quest for N95 masks, our study has unveiled a robust correlation, akin to a breath of fresh air in a crowded room. The statistical significance of the observed association underscores the palpable impact of environmental factors on public behavior, akin to air pollution casting its shadow on the collective psyche. Our findings lend credence to the notion that the air we breathe intertwines with our virtual queries, as if to say, "the scent of pollution lingers even as the clicks of concerned individuals echo through cyberspace."

The resonance of our results reverberates through the urban landscape, a testament to the fusion of sartorial mystique and the solemn undertones of respiratory well-being. This fusion, akin to a whimsical waltz amidst the haze of environmental hazards, beckons policymakers to contemplate the serious undercurrents that underpin the shimmering mirage of N95 masks in the public consciousness.

As we bid adieu to this dimly lit corridor of inquiry, it becomes clear that the subtle dance of air pollution and public preoccupation has reached its denouement. The curtain falls on this act, revealing a tableau of insights that not only inform public health policies but also hint at the potential for an N95-themed masquerade ball - a whimsical notion, yet a fitting denouement for a scholarly odyssey that has cast light on the interplay between environmental impact and public awareness. Therefore, it can be confidently asserted that no further research is necessary in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Masking the Effects: Air Pollution and the Search for N95 Masks in Boise City. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Gadgets and Gizmos


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Masking the Effects: Air Pollution and the Search for N95 Masks in Boise City. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Air Quality and Respiratory Protection


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Masking the Effects: Air Pollution and the Search for N95 Masks in Boise City with an abstract of This study examines the relationship between air pollution levels in Boise City and the frequency of Google searches for 'n95 mask'. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on the potential impact of air pollution on public awareness and concern regarding respiratory protection. The findings revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8301411 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2005 to 2022, suggesting a strong association between air quality and the public's interest in acquiring N95 masks. Our study provides valuable insights into the intersection of environmental factors and consumer behavior, highlighting the importance of respiratory health in the face of airborne hazards.

ChatGPT:

air pollution levels, N95 mask searches, Boise City, respiratory protection, Google Trends, Environmental Protection Agency, correlation coefficient, air quality, public awareness, consumer behavior, environmental factors, respiratory health, airborne hazards

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Boise City
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Boise City, ID
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Boise City

Google searches for 'n95 mask'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'n95 mask' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'n95 mask'

Correlation r = 0.8301411 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6891342 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'n95 mask') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Boise City) over the 18 years from 2005 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.01E-5. 0.0000201462195144615730000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.00201% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 49,637 random variables You don't actually need 49 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.59, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Boise City (Bad air quality days)0.2739730.5479450.82191800000.8196721.095890.2739731.095890.2732241.3698600.2739733.005461.095890.547945
Google searches for 'n95 mask' (Rel. search volume)0.6666671001.66667000511111.666671.1428634.758.583336.33333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.273973,0.547945,0.821918,0,0,0,0,0.819672,1.09589,0.273973,1.09589,0.273224,1.36986,0,0.273973,3.00546,1.09589,0.547945,])
array_2 = np.array([0.666667,1,0,0,1.66667,0,0,0,5,1,1,1,1,1.66667,1.14286,34.75,8.58333,6.33333,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Boise City"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'n95 mask'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 2762 · Black Variable ID: 20369 · Red Variable ID: 1496
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0