about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,558 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the second variable is Wins for the San Francisco Giants.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the demand for ophthalmic medical technicians in California rose, more and more people with a keen eye for detail and precision entered the workforce. This led to a sudden surge in visual acuity across the state, including among the players of the San Francisco Giants. With their enhanced ability to see and react to the game, the Giants found a new clarity in their performance, allowing them to clinch victory after victory on the baseball field. After all, when it comes to winning, every little (eye)ball helps.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a scene inspired by a sci-fi fantasy genre, where a bustling California town is depicted with a bright, buzzing stadium at its center. Ophthalmic medical technicians wearing lucky scrubs cheerfully walk towards the stadium, their positive vibes swirling in the air. Within the stadium, the San Francisco Giants play with vigor amidst the cheers of the crowd, while the energy from the technicians transforms into an invisible force propelling the team to victory after victory. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation a meme Art nouveau Cybernetic art Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: Sci-fi fantasy

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants, in the following situation: The ophthalmic medical technicians were wearing their lucky scrubs, which unknowingly transmitted good vibes to the Giants players on game days. The more technicians there were, the stronger the positive energy flowing into the stadium, leading to more wins for the team.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling California town, a sea of ophthalmic medical technicians wearing their lucky scrubs cheerfully walk towards the bright, buzzing stadium, their positive vibes swirling in the air. In the center of the stadium, the San Francisco Giants play with vigor amidst the cheers of the crowd, the energy from the technicians transforming into an invisible force that propels the team to victory after victory.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Sci-fi fantasy ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling California town, a sea of ophthalmic medical technicians wearing their lucky scrubs cheerfully walk towards the bright, buzzing stadium, their positive vibes swirling in the air. In the center of the stadium, the San Francisco Giants play with vigor amidst the cheers of the crowd, the energy from the technicians transforming into an invisible force that propels the team to victory after victory. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a scene inspired by a sci-fi fantasy genre, where a bustling California town is depicted with a bright, buzzing stadium at its center. Ophthalmic medical technicians wearing lucky scrubs cheerfully walk towards the stadium, their positive vibes swirling in the air. Within the stadium, the San Francisco Giants play with vigor amidst the cheers of the crowd, while the energy from the technicians transforms into an invisible force propelling the team to victory after victory.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California caused Wins for the San Francisco Giants to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Astonishing Alliteration: Assessing the Association Between Ophthalmic Medical Technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants

The Journal of Spectacular Synergy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6478212 and p < 0.05 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Astonishing Alliteration: Assessing the Association Between Ophthalmic Medical Technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the obscure relationship between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. By meticulously analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, a curious correlation coefficient of 0.6478212 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022 was discovered. Our findings suggest a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated factors, shedding light on an unexpected and peculiar association that may influence the outcome of baseball games. This research encourages further investigation into the whimsical and enigmatic interplay of seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that in the world of statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Astonishing Alliteration: Assessing the Association Between Ophthalmic Medical Technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the obscure relationship between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. By meticulously analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, a curious correlation coefficient of 0.6478212 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022 was discovered. Our findings suggest a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated factors, shedding light on an unexpected and peculiar association that may influence the outcome of baseball games. This research encourages further investigation into the whimsical and enigmatic interplay of seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that in the world of statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the world of statistics, where correlations abound and causation often remains elusive, it is not uncommon to encounter unexpected associations that defy conventional logic. One such enigmatic relationship that has piqued the interest of researchers and sports enthusiasts alike is the purported link between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in the state of California and the wins recorded by the venerable San Francisco Giants baseball team.

While the notion of a connection between the ocular health workforce and the fortunes of a professional sports franchise may initially sound far-fetched, our investigation delved deep into the data to unravel this peculiar correlation. The allure of uncovering this tie-in lies in its very absurdity, reminiscent of a blind umpire calling a game or a "spectacular catch" that leaves everyone scratching their heads – a mix of sight gags and intrigues, if you will.

This study probed the shadowy realms of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the labyrinthine database of Baseball-Reference.com to untangle the invisible threads that bind these disparate spheres. What emerged from this statistical spelunking was a correlation coefficient that flirted boldly at 0.6478212, capturing our attention and raising an eyebrow in surprise. The ensuing p-value of less than 0.05 further affirmed the statistical significance of this beguiling association, compelling us to delve deeper into this juncture of sports and eye care. It appears that when it comes to baseball wins, the eyes may have it—quite literally.

As if beckoning to us from the diamond's grassy expanse, this unforeseen coupling prompts the scholarly community to peer through the lenses of statistics and reevaluate what constitutes a meaningful "spectacle" in the world of sports analytics. With one eye on the ball and the other scanning for outliers, our endeavor to shed light on this whimsical interplay serves as a reminder that even in the realm of arcane statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Astonishing Alliteration: Assessing the Association Between Ophthalmic Medical Technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the obscure relationship between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. By meticulously analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, a curious correlation coefficient of 0.6478212 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022 was discovered. Our findings suggest a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated factors, shedding light on an unexpected and peculiar association that may influence the outcome of baseball games. This research encourages further investigation into the whimsical and enigmatic interplay of seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that in the world of statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of statistics, where correlations abound and causation often remains elusive, it is not uncommon to encounter unexpected associations that defy conventional logic. One such enigmatic relationship that has piqued the interest of researchers and sports enthusiasts alike is the purported link between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in the state of California and the wins recorded by the venerable San Francisco Giants baseball team.
While the notion of a connection between the ocular health workforce and the fortunes of a professional sports franchise may initially sound far-fetched, our investigation delved deep into the data to unravel this peculiar correlation. The allure of uncovering this tie-in lies in its very absurdity, reminiscent of a blind umpire calling a game or a "spectacular catch" that leaves everyone scratching their heads – a mix of sight gags and intrigues, if you will.
This study probed the shadowy realms of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the labyrinthine database of Baseball-Reference.com to untangle the invisible threads that bind these disparate spheres. What emerged from this statistical spelunking was a correlation coefficient that flirted boldly at 0.6478212, capturing our attention and raising an eyebrow in surprise. The ensuing p-value of less than 0.05 further affirmed the statistical significance of this beguiling association, compelling us to delve deeper into this juncture of sports and eye care. It appears that when it comes to baseball wins, the eyes may have it—quite literally.
As if beckoning to us from the diamond's grassy expanse, this unforeseen coupling prompts the scholarly community to peer through the lenses of statistics and reevaluate what constitutes a meaningful "spectacle" in the world of sports analytics. With one eye on the ball and the other scanning for outliers, our endeavor to shed light on this whimsical interplay serves as a reminder that even in the realm of arcane statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their groundbreaking study, Smith et al. (2015) delve into the annals of ophthalmic medical technicians in California, examining the rigorous training and pivotal roles these professionals play in the realm of eye care. Their findings emphasize the crucial link between expertise in ocular health and the delivery of high-quality vision care, underlining the indispensable nature of these practitioners in safeguarding the visual prowess of the populace. Little did they suspect that the deeds of these ocular wizards might cast a subtle enchantment upon the fortunes of a certain baseball team.

On the baseball front, Doe and Jones (2017) explore the multifaceted dynamics behind the cultivation of a winning sports franchise, dissecting the myriad factors that contribute to the triumphs and tribulations of teams. Their study paints a vivid portrait of the intricacies of team dynamics, coaching prowess, and the fickle fortunes of athletic competition. As their work immerses the reader in the drama and excitement of the sporting arena, it unintentionally sets the stage for the unforeseen conjunction of ophthalmic expertise and baseball prowess.

Transitioning from the academic realm to the world of non-fiction, "See the World Clearly" by Dr. Iris Vision (2016) provides a lucid portrayal of the advancements in eye care and the tireless efforts of the individuals who ensure visual clarity for the masses. Little do they know that the clarity they bring to the world of optics may hint at hidden connections with the clarity sought by the San Francisco Giants in their pursuit of victory.

In contrast, a fictional twist on the intersection between medical expertise and sporting glory is offered in "Eyes on the Prize" by Sporting Sara (2019). In this whimsical tale of a baseball team's improbable journey to the top, the narrative weaves a cloaked thread connecting the astute vigilance of eye care professionals with the fabled triumphs on the diamond. The author’s tantalizing prose hints at a kinship between the meticulous attention to detail required in the world of ophthalmic medicine and the dogged pursuit of excellence in the arena of sports.

Adding an unexpected dimension to the mix, the ubiquitous internet meme "Distracted Boyfriend" humorously parallels the subtle distractions that can captivate both ophthalmic medical technicians and devoted fans of the San Francisco Giants, diverting their attention from their respective duties into the realm of unexpected statistical connections. This pervasive meme playfully underscores the unforeseen caprices and diversions that can entangle even the most focused minds, reminding us that in the labyrinth of statistics, the unexpected often emerges as the true victor.

As we traverse through the maze of literature, we are prompted to recognize that in the realm of unexpected statistical associations, one must always keep a vigilant eye out for the unforeseen—both on and off the field.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Astonishing Alliteration: Assessing the Association Between Ophthalmic Medical Technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the obscure relationship between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. By meticulously analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, a curious correlation coefficient of 0.6478212 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022 was discovered. Our findings suggest a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated factors, shedding light on an unexpected and peculiar association that may influence the outcome of baseball games. This research encourages further investigation into the whimsical and enigmatic interplay of seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that in the world of statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of statistics, where correlations abound and causation often remains elusive, it is not uncommon to encounter unexpected associations that defy conventional logic. One such enigmatic relationship that has piqued the interest of researchers and sports enthusiasts alike is the purported link between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in the state of California and the wins recorded by the venerable San Francisco Giants baseball team.
While the notion of a connection between the ocular health workforce and the fortunes of a professional sports franchise may initially sound far-fetched, our investigation delved deep into the data to unravel this peculiar correlation. The allure of uncovering this tie-in lies in its very absurdity, reminiscent of a blind umpire calling a game or a "spectacular catch" that leaves everyone scratching their heads – a mix of sight gags and intrigues, if you will.
This study probed the shadowy realms of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the labyrinthine database of Baseball-Reference.com to untangle the invisible threads that bind these disparate spheres. What emerged from this statistical spelunking was a correlation coefficient that flirted boldly at 0.6478212, capturing our attention and raising an eyebrow in surprise. The ensuing p-value of less than 0.05 further affirmed the statistical significance of this beguiling association, compelling us to delve deeper into this juncture of sports and eye care. It appears that when it comes to baseball wins, the eyes may have it—quite literally.
As if beckoning to us from the diamond's grassy expanse, this unforeseen coupling prompts the scholarly community to peer through the lenses of statistics and reevaluate what constitutes a meaningful "spectacle" in the world of sports analytics. With one eye on the ball and the other scanning for outliers, our endeavor to shed light on this whimsical interplay serves as a reminder that even in the realm of arcane statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our investigation into the curious conundrum of ophthalmic medical technicians and baseball triumphs, we embarked on a data-gathering journey worthy of Odysseus himself. Armed with an unwavering determination to uncover any nuggets of insight, we scoured the vast expanse of the internet for relevant information from 2012 to 2022. While our intrepid quest led us through the labyrinthine corridors of data, we primarily relied on the formidable sources of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the hallowed annals of Baseball-Reference.com.

With our trusty spreadsheet software at the ready, we meticulously recorded and organized the employment figures for ophthalmic medical technicians within the Golden State, paying careful attention to regional variations and trends. Furthermore, we meticulously tracked the ebbs and flows of the San Francisco Giants' wins throughout the specified timeframe, ensuring every triumphant victory and heartbreaking defeat found its rightful place in our dataset.

Once armed with this trove of numerical treasures, we donned our metaphorical statistical spectacles and embarked on a perilous journey of analysis. Employing a variety of robust statistical techniques, we sought to unveil any semblance of a relationship—no matter how improbable—between the number of diligent eye-care specialists and the performance of our beloved San Francisco Giants. Our aim was clear: we were determined to bring to light any hidden patterns or correlations that may, like a well-hidden baseball in the outfield, elude the untrained eye.

With the clarity of a well-focused lens, we subjected our data to the rigorous scrutiny of correlation analysis, teasing out the alluring coefficient that would hold the key to unlocking the mystery at hand. Cloaked in the cloak of scientific inquiry, we probed the statistical depths, employing various tools to ascertain the degree of association between our seemingly incongruous variables.

In stitching together this intricate tapestry of analysis, we kept a watchful eye out for any confounding factors that might obscure our findings, aiming to ensure our conclusions stood as stalwart as the outfield wall at Oracle Park. In doing so, we endeavored to maintain a keen focus on methodological rigor, recognizing that in the realm of statistics, as in the outfield, a single misstep can result in a game-changing error.

Having traversed the landscape of data with unwavering determination and a touch of scholarly whimsy, we arrived at our destination: the unveiling of a statistically significant association between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and wins for the San Francisco Giants. And so, armed with our findings, we stand poised to challenge the very notion of improbable connections, affirming that in the vast arena of statistical analysis, as in the grand game of baseball, the unexpected may well be where the true spectacles lie.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6478212, r-squared of 0.4196723, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Astonishing Alliteration: Assessing the Association Between Ophthalmic Medical Technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the obscure relationship between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. By meticulously analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, a curious correlation coefficient of 0.6478212 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022 was discovered. Our findings suggest a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated factors, shedding light on an unexpected and peculiar association that may influence the outcome of baseball games. This research encourages further investigation into the whimsical and enigmatic interplay of seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that in the world of statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the world of statistics, where correlations abound and causation often remains elusive, it is not uncommon to encounter unexpected associations that defy conventional logic. One such enigmatic relationship that has piqued the interest of researchers and sports enthusiasts alike is the purported link between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in the state of California and the wins recorded by the venerable San Francisco Giants baseball team.
While the notion of a connection between the ocular health workforce and the fortunes of a professional sports franchise may initially sound far-fetched, our investigation delved deep into the data to unravel this peculiar correlation. The allure of uncovering this tie-in lies in its very absurdity, reminiscent of a blind umpire calling a game or a "spectacular catch" that leaves everyone scratching their heads – a mix of sight gags and intrigues, if you will.
This study probed the shadowy realms of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the labyrinthine database of Baseball-Reference.com to untangle the invisible threads that bind these disparate spheres. What emerged from this statistical spelunking was a correlation coefficient that flirted boldly at 0.6478212, capturing our attention and raising an eyebrow in surprise. The ensuing p-value of less than 0.05 further affirmed the statistical significance of this beguiling association, compelling us to delve deeper into this juncture of sports and eye care. It appears that when it comes to baseball wins, the eyes may have it—quite literally.
As if beckoning to us from the diamond's grassy expanse, this unforeseen coupling prompts the scholarly community to peer through the lenses of statistics and reevaluate what constitutes a meaningful "spectacle" in the world of sports analytics. With one eye on the ball and the other scanning for outliers, our endeavor to shed light on this whimsical interplay serves as a reminder that even in the realm of arcane statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation unveiled a statistically significant correlation between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. Across the period from 2012 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.6478212, which indicated a moderately strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.4196723 further elucidated that approximately 41.97% of the variance in the Giants' wins could be explained by the variation in the number of ophthalmic medical technicians.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.05 confirmed the statistical significance of this association, prompting us to view this peculiar link between ophthalmic medical technicians and baseball victories with a raised eyebrow or perhaps a wink of surprise. This statistical oddity may leave many scratching their heads, not unlike a perplexing pitching performance or a hitter's curious slump—the kind of head-scratcher that keeps statisticians and sports fans alike on the edge of their seats.

Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot that visually signifies the strong correlation between the two variables. The plot illustrates the intriguing relationship between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the wins achieved by the San Francisco Giants, inviting the scholarly community to take a closer look at this unexpected connection. As the plot unfolds like an intricately woven tapestry of oddities, the relationship between these two variables emerges as a captivating mystery, much like a knuckleball dancing through the air or an outfielder making a gravity-defying leap to snag a fly ball.

These findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also underscore the enchanting and unpredictable nature of statistical associations. As we venture forth into the unexplored territories of unusual correlations, we are reminded that in the world of statistics, the unexpected often unveils itself in the most unlikely places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Astonishing Alliteration: Assessing the Association Between Ophthalmic Medical Technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the obscure relationship between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. By meticulously analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, a curious correlation coefficient of 0.6478212 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022 was discovered. Our findings suggest a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated factors, shedding light on an unexpected and peculiar association that may influence the outcome of baseball games. This research encourages further investigation into the whimsical and enigmatic interplay of seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that in the world of statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their groundbreaking study, Smith et al. (2015) delve into the annals of ophthalmic medical technicians in California, examining the rigorous training and pivotal roles these professionals play in the realm of eye care. Their findings emphasize the crucial link between expertise in ocular health and the delivery of high-quality vision care, underlining the indispensable nature of these practitioners in safeguarding the visual prowess of the populace. Little did they suspect that the deeds of these ocular wizards might cast a subtle enchantment upon the fortunes of a certain baseball team.
On the baseball front, Doe and Jones (2017) explore the multifaceted dynamics behind the cultivation of a winning sports franchise, dissecting the myriad factors that contribute to the triumphs and tribulations of teams. Their study paints a vivid portrait of the intricacies of team dynamics, coaching prowess, and the fickle fortunes of athletic competition. As their work immerses the reader in the drama and excitement of the sporting arena, it unintentionally sets the stage for the unforeseen conjunction of ophthalmic expertise and baseball prowess.
Transitioning from the academic realm to the world of non-fiction, "See the World Clearly" by Dr. Iris Vision (2016) provides a lucid portrayal of the advancements in eye care and the tireless efforts of the individuals who ensure visual clarity for the masses. Little do they know that the clarity they bring to the world of optics may hint at hidden connections with the clarity sought by the San Francisco Giants in their pursuit of victory.
In contrast, a fictional twist on the intersection between medical expertise and sporting glory is offered in "Eyes on the Prize" by Sporting Sara (2019). In this whimsical tale of a baseball team's improbable journey to the top, the narrative weaves a cloaked thread connecting the astute vigilance of eye care professionals with the fabled triumphs on the diamond. The author’s tantalizing prose hints at a kinship between the meticulous attention to detail required in the world of ophthalmic medicine and the dogged pursuit of excellence in the arena of sports.
Adding an unexpected dimension to the mix, the ubiquitous internet meme "Distracted Boyfriend" humorously parallels the subtle distractions that can captivate both ophthalmic medical technicians and devoted fans of the San Francisco Giants, diverting their attention from their respective duties into the realm of unexpected statistical connections. This pervasive meme playfully underscores the unforeseen caprices and diversions that can entangle even the most focused minds, reminding us that in the labyrinth of statistics, the unexpected often emerges as the true victor.
As we traverse through the maze of literature, we are prompted to recognize that in the realm of unexpected statistical associations, one must always keep a vigilant eye out for the unforeseen—both on and off the field.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unveiled a statistically significant correlation between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. Across the period from 2012 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.6478212, which indicated a moderately strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.4196723 further elucidated that approximately 41.97% of the variance in the Giants' wins could be explained by the variation in the number of ophthalmic medical technicians.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.05 confirmed the statistical significance of this association, prompting us to view this peculiar link between ophthalmic medical technicians and baseball victories with a raised eyebrow or perhaps a wink of surprise. This statistical oddity may leave many scratching their heads, not unlike a perplexing pitching performance or a hitter's curious slump—the kind of head-scratcher that keeps statisticians and sports fans alike on the edge of their seats.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot that visually signifies the strong correlation between the two variables. The plot illustrates the intriguing relationship between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the wins achieved by the San Francisco Giants, inviting the scholarly community to take a closer look at this unexpected connection. As the plot unfolds like an intricately woven tapestry of oddities, the relationship between these two variables emerges as a captivating mystery, much like a knuckleball dancing through the air or an outfielder making a gravity-defying leap to snag a fly ball.
These findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also underscore the enchanting and unpredictable nature of statistical associations. As we venture forth into the unexplored territories of unusual correlations, we are reminded that in the world of statistics, the unexpected often unveils itself in the most unlikely places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The enigmatic union of ophthalmic medical technicians and the San Francisco Giants has unfurled like a melodramatic saga of statistical serendipity. While initially, this peculiar correlation may arouse a seemingly incredulous response akin to an umpire's befuddlement at a close call, our findings support the prior research that subtly hinted at the surprising connections within the realms of ocular health and sporting triumph.

Delving into the annals of ophthalmic medicine, the works of Smith et al. (2015) underscore the vital role played by these ocular aficionados in safeguarding visual acuity. Little did they realize that the astute vigilance and precision demanded by their profession might extend a watchful eye over the outcomes of baseball games in the Bay Area. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2017) painted a vivid portrait of the intricate dynamics behind a winning sports franchise, inadvertently setting the stage for the unforeseen conjunction of ophthalmic expertise and baseball prowess, a conjunction that our results have now confirmed.

In an unexpected twist, the ubiquitous internet meme "Distracted Boyfriend" playfully parallels the subtle distractions that captivate both ophthalmic medical technicians and devoted fans of the San Francisco Giants, diverting their attention into the realm of unexpected statistical connections. As odd as it may seem, this meme accurately embodies the captivation both parties experience, finding themselves immersed in the labyrinth of statistical oddities.

The scatterplot, akin to a surrealist painting showcasing a whimsical dance between the two variables, visually signifies the inexplicable link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It tantalizes the scholarly community, beckoning them to scrutinize this quirky correlation as if it were a Sherlock Holmes mystery, where the unusual and the inconceivable coalesce into an unexpected love affair between two disparate worlds—a love affair artfully illustrated by an intriguing correlation coefficient and a p-value that raises more than a few eyebrows.

Our findings, echoing the insights of the literature, remind us that in the world of statistics, surprises often linger in the most improbable places, much like an underdog team triumphing against all odds or a sudden eruption of hitting prowess amidst a batting slump. This study champions the excitement, the enchantment, and the captivating allure of delving into the enigmatic tapestry of statistical associations, where the eye-catching and the mind-boggling take center stage in a drama that defies conventional wisdom.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Astonishing Alliteration: Assessing the Association Between Ophthalmic Medical Technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the obscure relationship between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. By meticulously analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, a curious correlation coefficient of 0.6478212 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022 was discovered. Our findings suggest a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated factors, shedding light on an unexpected and peculiar association that may influence the outcome of baseball games. This research encourages further investigation into the whimsical and enigmatic interplay of seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that in the world of statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the world of statistics, where correlations abound and causation often remains elusive, it is not uncommon to encounter unexpected associations that defy conventional logic. One such enigmatic relationship that has piqued the interest of researchers and sports enthusiasts alike is the purported link between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in the state of California and the wins recorded by the venerable San Francisco Giants baseball team.
While the notion of a connection between the ocular health workforce and the fortunes of a professional sports franchise may initially sound far-fetched, our investigation delved deep into the data to unravel this peculiar correlation. The allure of uncovering this tie-in lies in its very absurdity, reminiscent of a blind umpire calling a game or a "spectacular catch" that leaves everyone scratching their heads – a mix of sight gags and intrigues, if you will.
This study probed the shadowy realms of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the labyrinthine database of Baseball-Reference.com to untangle the invisible threads that bind these disparate spheres. What emerged from this statistical spelunking was a correlation coefficient that flirted boldly at 0.6478212, capturing our attention and raising an eyebrow in surprise. The ensuing p-value of less than 0.05 further affirmed the statistical significance of this beguiling association, compelling us to delve deeper into this juncture of sports and eye care. It appears that when it comes to baseball wins, the eyes may have it—quite literally.
As if beckoning to us from the diamond's grassy expanse, this unforeseen coupling prompts the scholarly community to peer through the lenses of statistics and reevaluate what constitutes a meaningful "spectacle" in the world of sports analytics. With one eye on the ball and the other scanning for outliers, our endeavor to shed light on this whimsical interplay serves as a reminder that even in the realm of arcane statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unveiled a statistically significant correlation between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. Across the period from 2012 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.6478212, which indicated a moderately strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.4196723 further elucidated that approximately 41.97% of the variance in the Giants' wins could be explained by the variation in the number of ophthalmic medical technicians.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.05 confirmed the statistical significance of this association, prompting us to view this peculiar link between ophthalmic medical technicians and baseball victories with a raised eyebrow or perhaps a wink of surprise. This statistical oddity may leave many scratching their heads, not unlike a perplexing pitching performance or a hitter's curious slump—the kind of head-scratcher that keeps statisticians and sports fans alike on the edge of their seats.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot that visually signifies the strong correlation between the two variables. The plot illustrates the intriguing relationship between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the wins achieved by the San Francisco Giants, inviting the scholarly community to take a closer look at this unexpected connection. As the plot unfolds like an intricately woven tapestry of oddities, the relationship between these two variables emerges as a captivating mystery, much like a knuckleball dancing through the air or an outfielder making a gravity-defying leap to snag a fly ball.
These findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also underscore the enchanting and unpredictable nature of statistical associations. As we venture forth into the unexplored territories of unusual correlations, we are reminded that in the world of statistics, the unexpected often unveils itself in the most unlikely places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study unearthed a remarkable and statistically significant association between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. The correlation coefficient of 0.6478212 and the p-value of less than 0.05 left us with more than just food for thought - it left us with a full platter of statistical anomalies and perhaps a side of garlic fries.

This curious connection, akin to a knuckleball momentarily evading the batter's bat, challenges our preconceptions and urges us to consider that in the world of statistics, nothing is beyond the realm of possibility. While our findings may seem as unexpected as a bat flipping after a home run, they further illustrate the whimsical and enigmatic nature of statistical relationships, reminding us that in the game of numbers, there's always room for a grand slam of surprise.

As much as we may like to continue exploring this confounding correlation, it seems that our findings leave us with only one clear conclusion: no more research is needed in this area. Just like a pitcher with a no-hitter, some mysteries are best left unexplained, adding to the charm and intrigue of the statistical tapestry that surrounds us.

In the spirit of the unpredictability that defines both baseball and statistical associations, we are left with a sense of wonder and a dash of humor, as we close this chapter of our exploration into the peculiar pairing of ophthalmic medical technicians and baseball triumphs. While our study may not have provided all the answers, it has certainly left us with a legacy of curious contemplation and an enduring appreciation for the quirky interplay of statistics and the world around us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Astonishing Alliteration: Assessing the Association Between Ophthalmic Medical Technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Spectacular Synergy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Astonishing Alliteration: Assessing the Association Between Ophthalmic Medical Technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Silly Scientific Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Astonishing Alliteration: Assessing the Association Between Ophthalmic Medical Technicians in California and Wins for the San Francisco Giants with an abstract of This study investigates the obscure relationship between the number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California and the performance of the San Francisco Giants. By meticulously analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, a curious correlation coefficient of 0.6478212 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning 2012 to 2022 was discovered. Our findings suggest a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated factors, shedding light on an unexpected and peculiar association that may influence the outcome of baseball games. This research encourages further investigation into the whimsical and enigmatic interplay of seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that in the world of statistics, one must always keep an eye out for the unforeseen.

ChatGPT:

ophthalmic medical technicians California, San Francisco Giants performance, correlation between ophthalmic medical technicians and baseball performance, Bureau of Labor Statistics data, Baseball-Reference.com data, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, association between unrelated factors, influence of unrelated variables on baseball games

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of ophthalmic medical technicians in California
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California

Wins for the San Francisco Giants
Detailed data title: The season win/loss ratio for the San Francisco Giants
Source: Baseball-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Wins for the San Francisco Giants

Correlation r = 0.6478212 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4196723 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 42% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wins for the San Francisco Giants) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.031. 0.0311348075734883580000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.65 in 3.1% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 32 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.08, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California (Laborers)35304070368041203540328030103760446056104170
Wins for the San Francisco Giants (Win/Loss Ratio)0.580.4690.5430.5190.5370.3950.4510.4750.4830.660.5




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3530,4070,3680,4120,3540,3280,3010,3760,4460,5610,4170,])
array_2 = np.array([0.58,0.469,0.543,0.519,0.537,0.395,0.451,0.475,0.483,0.66,0.5,])
array_1_name = "The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in California"
array_2_name = "Wins for the San Francisco Giants"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 2558 · Black Variable ID: 18912 · Red Variable ID: 4346
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0