about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,166 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the second variable is Google searches for 'who is elon musk'.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more coaches and scouts flocked to Puerto Rico, the island's athletic talent skyrocketed. This led to a surge in exceptional athletes, one of whom was a pro rocketeer. As these new sporting sensations gained fame, people couldn't help but wonder, "Who is Elon Musk, and can he throw a touchdown?" It's all about finding the next star... whether on the field or in the cosmos!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that combines data cyber art with a scene set in a bustling café in Puerto Rico. The scene depicts a group of baseball coaches and scouts gathered around a table, engrossed in discussion about potential prospects. They are also seen on their smartphones, googling "who is elon musk" with curious expressions on their faces. The ambiance should include the vibrant colors of the café and a futuristic touch to convey the data cyber art style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk Data cyber art Voxel art A black-and-white newspaper illustration Minimalism
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and Google searches for 'who is elon musk' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling café in Puerto Rico, a group of baseball coaches and scouts gather around a table, discussing potential prospects. Meanwhile, on their smartphones, they are also seen googling "who is elon musk" with curious expressions on their faces.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling café in Puerto Rico, a group of baseball coaches and scouts gather around a table, discussing potential prospects. Meanwhile, on their smartphones, they are also seen googling "who is elon musk" with curious expressions on their faces. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that combines data cyber art with a scene set in a bustling café in Puerto Rico. The scene depicts a group of baseball coaches and scouts gathered around a table, engrossed in discussion about potential prospects. They are also seen on their smartphones, googling "who is elon musk" with curious expressions on their faces. The ambiance should include the vibrant colors of the café and a futuristic touch to convey the data cyber art style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico caused who is elon musk (Google searches for 'who is elon musk') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Scouting for Silicon Valley: An Analysis of the Link between Sports Personnel and Public Interest in Tech Tycoons

Journal of Sports Sociology and Technology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Scouting for Silicon Valley: An Analysis of the Link between Sports Personnel and Public Interest in Tech Tycoons"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unsuspecting relationship between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk.' By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on this unconventional connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and p < 0.01 across the years 2005 to 2022, indicating a clear and statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. The implications of these unexpected results prompt further investigation and contemplation, challenging traditional paradigms and inviting us to consider the uncharted territories of influence on public curiosity. This sheds light on a curious case, reminding us that in the realm of research, truth is often stranger than fiction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scouting for Silicon Valley: An Analysis of the Link between Sports Personnel and Public Interest in Tech Tycoons"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unsuspecting relationship between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk.' By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on this unconventional connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and p < 0.01 across the years 2005 to 2022, indicating a clear and statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. The implications of these unexpected results prompt further investigation and contemplation, challenging traditional paradigms and inviting us to consider the uncharted territories of influence on public curiosity. This sheds light on a curious case, reminding us that in the realm of research, truth is often stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the multifaceted realm of human inquiry, the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, revealing links between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our research endeavors to explore one such serendipitous connection between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the public's intrigue surrounding the famed tech tycoon, Elon Musk. While this pairing may initially appear as incongruous as a mismatched pair of socks, our analysis aims to illustrate that in the landscape of data exploration, even the most unlikely pairings can yield fruitful insights.

As the digital age continues to flourish and technology permeates every facet of modern life, public fascination with the luminaries of the tech industry has surged. Meanwhile, Puerto Rico has long been associated more with surf and sand than silicon and semiconductors. Yet, beneath these divergent facades lie data points waiting to be correlated and patterns begging to be unearthed. Our inquiry seeks to bridge the gap between the fields of sports personnel and high-tech luminaries, inviting us to contemplate the unexpected interplay of factors that shape public curiosity.

This endeavor is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis and data mining; it is a journey of enigma and enlightenment. While our investigation may lead us through statistical thickets and labyrinthine correlation matrices, it is crucial to remember that at the heart of our pursuit lies the human penchant for curiosity and connection, much like a detective hot on the trail of an elusive suspect. The perplexing correlation that we reveal challenges our assumptions and beckons us to explore uncharted territories of influence, where the seemingly inconsequential actions of sports personnel in Puerto Rico exert an unexpected tug on the public's digital inquisitiveness.

As we embark on this quest of quirk and inquiry, let us remember that in the precarious balance between probability and paradox, truth often emerges as the most captivating puzzle piece of all. Join us as we unravel the curious case of scouting for Silicon Valley and ponder the quizzical ways in which our digital footsteps lead us down unexpected avenues of discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scouting for Silicon Valley: An Analysis of the Link between Sports Personnel and Public Interest in Tech Tycoons"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unsuspecting relationship between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk.' By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on this unconventional connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and p < 0.01 across the years 2005 to 2022, indicating a clear and statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. The implications of these unexpected results prompt further investigation and contemplation, challenging traditional paradigms and inviting us to consider the uncharted territories of influence on public curiosity. This sheds light on a curious case, reminding us that in the realm of research, truth is often stranger than fiction.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the multifaceted realm of human inquiry, the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, revealing links between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our research endeavors to explore one such serendipitous connection between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the public's intrigue surrounding the famed tech tycoon, Elon Musk. While this pairing may initially appear as incongruous as a mismatched pair of socks, our analysis aims to illustrate that in the landscape of data exploration, even the most unlikely pairings can yield fruitful insights.
As the digital age continues to flourish and technology permeates every facet of modern life, public fascination with the luminaries of the tech industry has surged. Meanwhile, Puerto Rico has long been associated more with surf and sand than silicon and semiconductors. Yet, beneath these divergent facades lie data points waiting to be correlated and patterns begging to be unearthed. Our inquiry seeks to bridge the gap between the fields of sports personnel and high-tech luminaries, inviting us to contemplate the unexpected interplay of factors that shape public curiosity.
This endeavor is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis and data mining; it is a journey of enigma and enlightenment. While our investigation may lead us through statistical thickets and labyrinthine correlation matrices, it is crucial to remember that at the heart of our pursuit lies the human penchant for curiosity and connection, much like a detective hot on the trail of an elusive suspect. The perplexing correlation that we reveal challenges our assumptions and beckons us to explore uncharted territories of influence, where the seemingly inconsequential actions of sports personnel in Puerto Rico exert an unexpected tug on the public's digital inquisitiveness.
As we embark on this quest of quirk and inquiry, let us remember that in the precarious balance between probability and paradox, truth often emerges as the most captivating puzzle piece of all. Join us as we unravel the curious case of scouting for Silicon Valley and ponder the quizzical ways in which our digital footsteps lead us down unexpected avenues of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The study of unconventional relationships and unexpected correlations has long been a subject of scholarly interest. Smith and Doe (2010) examined the potential impact of non-traditional variables on public interest, tracing the curious connection between celebrity dessert chefs and global ice cream consumption. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2015) delved into the enigmatic interplay of sock color and political leanings, uncovering a surprising affinity between individuals who preferred polka-dotted socks and a penchant for political satire. These studies underscore the pervasive nature of unanticipated associations in shaping human behavior, prompting us to consider the uncharted depths of influence in our diverse and interconnected world.

Venturing beyond the realm of academia, numerous non-fiction works have also traversed the terrain of unexpected relationships. In "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the authors illuminate the peculiar connections between seemingly disparate phenomena, challenging conventional wisdom and thrilling readers with tales of unlikely correlations. Similarly, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell dissects the intricate web of social dynamics, revealing the hidden forces that propel trends and shape our collective consciousness. These thought-provoking works beckon us to contemplate the mysterious ways in which seemingly unrelated factors can intertwine, akin to the curious case we seek to unravel in our own research.

Turning to the realm of fiction, the works of Douglas Adams in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" series offer a whimsical exploration of the absurd and the unexpected, inviting readers to journey through the cosmic tapestry of improbable occurrences. In a parallel universe, the detective prowess of Sherlock Holmes in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's tales navigates the labyrinth of seemingly disconnected clues, ultimately revealing the intricate threads that bind disparate elements into a cohesive whole.

At the intersection of leisure and intrigue, board games such as "Clue" and "Mystery of the Abbey" immerse players in the thrill of solving perplexing puzzles and deciphering cryptic connections, mirroring the investigative spirit that propels our scholarly exploration. These playful pursuits remind us that the pursuit of knowledge is not immune to whimsy and wonder, as we embark on our own quest to uncover the unexpected ties between sports personnel and public curiosity about tech titans.

As we embark on this literary odyssey, let us recall that truth often emerges from the most unexpected intersections, guiding us through the delightful maze of inquiry and insight. Our own undertaking to scrutinize the relationship between sports personnel in Puerto Rico and public intrigue toward tech tycoons mirrors the enchanting tales and scholarly pursuits that have long captivated the human quest for knowledge and connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2005 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scouting for Silicon Valley: An Analysis of the Link between Sports Personnel and Public Interest in Tech Tycoons"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unsuspecting relationship between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk.' By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on this unconventional connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and p < 0.01 across the years 2005 to 2022, indicating a clear and statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. The implications of these unexpected results prompt further investigation and contemplation, challenging traditional paradigms and inviting us to consider the uncharted territories of influence on public curiosity. This sheds light on a curious case, reminding us that in the realm of research, truth is often stranger than fiction.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the multifaceted realm of human inquiry, the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, revealing links between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our research endeavors to explore one such serendipitous connection between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the public's intrigue surrounding the famed tech tycoon, Elon Musk. While this pairing may initially appear as incongruous as a mismatched pair of socks, our analysis aims to illustrate that in the landscape of data exploration, even the most unlikely pairings can yield fruitful insights.
As the digital age continues to flourish and technology permeates every facet of modern life, public fascination with the luminaries of the tech industry has surged. Meanwhile, Puerto Rico has long been associated more with surf and sand than silicon and semiconductors. Yet, beneath these divergent facades lie data points waiting to be correlated and patterns begging to be unearthed. Our inquiry seeks to bridge the gap between the fields of sports personnel and high-tech luminaries, inviting us to contemplate the unexpected interplay of factors that shape public curiosity.
This endeavor is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis and data mining; it is a journey of enigma and enlightenment. While our investigation may lead us through statistical thickets and labyrinthine correlation matrices, it is crucial to remember that at the heart of our pursuit lies the human penchant for curiosity and connection, much like a detective hot on the trail of an elusive suspect. The perplexing correlation that we reveal challenges our assumptions and beckons us to explore uncharted territories of influence, where the seemingly inconsequential actions of sports personnel in Puerto Rico exert an unexpected tug on the public's digital inquisitiveness.
As we embark on this quest of quirk and inquiry, let us remember that in the precarious balance between probability and paradox, truth often emerges as the most captivating puzzle piece of all. Join us as we unravel the curious case of scouting for Silicon Valley and ponder the quizzical ways in which our digital footsteps lead us down unexpected avenues of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on this curious quest of quirk and inquiry, our research team ventured into the digital labyrinth armed with spreadsheets, statistical tools, and a penchant for the unpredictable. Our approach combined elements of data collection, statistical analysis, and a dash of whimsy, akin to a mad scientist in a laboratory of perplexing correlations.

Firstly, to quantify the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico, we delved into the Bureau of Labor Statistics' treasure trove of employment data. Like intrepid explorers unearthing ancient artifacts, we unearthed employment figures for sports personnel with the fervor of archeologists on a dig, navigating through the labyrinthine corridors of government databases to uncover these hidden gems of information.

Next, to measure the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk,' we turned our attention to the digital terrain of Google Trends. Like modern-day alchemists seeking the philosopher's stone, we sifted through the data, distilling patterns and trends from the digital ether. We peered into the virtual crystal ball of search queries, observing the ebb and flow of public curiosity with the same fascination as astronomers tracking celestial movements.

Having amassed these seemingly disjointed datasets, we employed the ancient arts of statistical analysis to reveal the hidden threads binding these variables. Our statistical arsenal included correlation coefficients, regression analyses, and hypothesis tests. We wielded these tools like seasoned swordsmen, parrying and thrusting through the tangled web of data, seeking to unveil the elusive relationship between sports personnel in Puerto Rico and the enigmatic allure of Elon Musk.

Additionally, our investigation traversed the temporal landscape, spanning the years 2005 to 2022. This expansive timeframe allowed us to capture the undulating rhythms of public interest and sports personnel's influence, akin to time-travelers chronicling the ever-shifting tides of curiosity and employment dynamics.

In true academic fashion, our methodologies are built upon rigorous standards and a touch of whimsy, embracing the unpredictability that often underlies the quest for knowledge. This combination yields a methodology that mirrors the complexity and quirkiness of the phenomena under investigation, uncovering correlations that may appear as improbable as a cosmic jester in the court of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2005 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9231135, r-squared of 0.8521385, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scouting for Silicon Valley: An Analysis of the Link between Sports Personnel and Public Interest in Tech Tycoons"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unsuspecting relationship between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk.' By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on this unconventional connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and p < 0.01 across the years 2005 to 2022, indicating a clear and statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. The implications of these unexpected results prompt further investigation and contemplation, challenging traditional paradigms and inviting us to consider the uncharted territories of influence on public curiosity. This sheds light on a curious case, reminding us that in the realm of research, truth is often stranger than fiction.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the multifaceted realm of human inquiry, the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, revealing links between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our research endeavors to explore one such serendipitous connection between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the public's intrigue surrounding the famed tech tycoon, Elon Musk. While this pairing may initially appear as incongruous as a mismatched pair of socks, our analysis aims to illustrate that in the landscape of data exploration, even the most unlikely pairings can yield fruitful insights.
As the digital age continues to flourish and technology permeates every facet of modern life, public fascination with the luminaries of the tech industry has surged. Meanwhile, Puerto Rico has long been associated more with surf and sand than silicon and semiconductors. Yet, beneath these divergent facades lie data points waiting to be correlated and patterns begging to be unearthed. Our inquiry seeks to bridge the gap between the fields of sports personnel and high-tech luminaries, inviting us to contemplate the unexpected interplay of factors that shape public curiosity.
This endeavor is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis and data mining; it is a journey of enigma and enlightenment. While our investigation may lead us through statistical thickets and labyrinthine correlation matrices, it is crucial to remember that at the heart of our pursuit lies the human penchant for curiosity and connection, much like a detective hot on the trail of an elusive suspect. The perplexing correlation that we reveal challenges our assumptions and beckons us to explore uncharted territories of influence, where the seemingly inconsequential actions of sports personnel in Puerto Rico exert an unexpected tug on the public's digital inquisitiveness.
As we embark on this quest of quirk and inquiry, let us remember that in the precarious balance between probability and paradox, truth often emerges as the most captivating puzzle piece of all. Join us as we unravel the curious case of scouting for Silicon Valley and ponder the quizzical ways in which our digital footsteps lead us down unexpected avenues of discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of our research data revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk.' Over the period spanning from 2005 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and an r-squared of 0.8521385, with a p-value of less than 0.01. These numbers not only reflect a strong statistical relationship but also hint at the compelling interplay of factors shaping public curiosity.

In Figure 1, a scatterplot visually illustrates the compelling correlation between the variables of interest. The clear clustering of data points reinforces the strength of the connection, affirming that the influence of sports personnel on the public's interest in tech luminaries is not merely a shot in the dark.

These results, while surprising at first glance, underscore the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. It seems that the realm of sports scouting may hold a hidden playbook for understanding the public's quest for insight into the enigmatic figures of the tech world. This revelation serves as a reminder that in the tapestry of human behavior, threads of fascination and fervor often weave themselves into unforeseen patterns, much like a thrilling plot twist in an unputdownable novel.

Upon closer examination, our findings prompt reflection on the mechanisms and motivators that steer public attention. One cannot help but ponder the peculiar dance of influences that molds our collective intrigue, akin to the intricate choreography of a synchronized swimming routine – where each movement, no matter how subtle, contributes to the larger spectacle.

These results shed light on the whimsical nature of human curiosity, prompting us to consider the myriad forces that shape our digital footprints. As we navigate the ever-expanding landscape of data exploration, we are reminded that even the unlikeliest pairs, much like a tandem of mismatched socks, can offer insights as profound as they are unexpected.

The implications of these findings beckon us to reimagine the bounds of influence and spark further investigations into the enigmatic interplay of sport and tech in shaping public interest. This curious connection uncovers yet another layer of complexity in the intricate tapestry of human behavior, challenging us to embrace the improbable and revel in the serendipitous links that underlie our quest for understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Scouting for Silicon Valley: An Analysis of the Link between Sports Personnel and Public Interest in Tech Tycoons"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unsuspecting relationship between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk.' By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on this unconventional connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and p < 0.01 across the years 2005 to 2022, indicating a clear and statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. The implications of these unexpected results prompt further investigation and contemplation, challenging traditional paradigms and inviting us to consider the uncharted territories of influence on public curiosity. This sheds light on a curious case, reminding us that in the realm of research, truth is often stranger than fiction.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of unconventional relationships and unexpected correlations has long been a subject of scholarly interest. Smith and Doe (2010) examined the potential impact of non-traditional variables on public interest, tracing the curious connection between celebrity dessert chefs and global ice cream consumption. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2015) delved into the enigmatic interplay of sock color and political leanings, uncovering a surprising affinity between individuals who preferred polka-dotted socks and a penchant for political satire. These studies underscore the pervasive nature of unanticipated associations in shaping human behavior, prompting us to consider the uncharted depths of influence in our diverse and interconnected world.
Venturing beyond the realm of academia, numerous non-fiction works have also traversed the terrain of unexpected relationships. In "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the authors illuminate the peculiar connections between seemingly disparate phenomena, challenging conventional wisdom and thrilling readers with tales of unlikely correlations. Similarly, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell dissects the intricate web of social dynamics, revealing the hidden forces that propel trends and shape our collective consciousness. These thought-provoking works beckon us to contemplate the mysterious ways in which seemingly unrelated factors can intertwine, akin to the curious case we seek to unravel in our own research.
Turning to the realm of fiction, the works of Douglas Adams in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" series offer a whimsical exploration of the absurd and the unexpected, inviting readers to journey through the cosmic tapestry of improbable occurrences. In a parallel universe, the detective prowess of Sherlock Holmes in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's tales navigates the labyrinth of seemingly disconnected clues, ultimately revealing the intricate threads that bind disparate elements into a cohesive whole.
At the intersection of leisure and intrigue, board games such as "Clue" and "Mystery of the Abbey" immerse players in the thrill of solving perplexing puzzles and deciphering cryptic connections, mirroring the investigative spirit that propels our scholarly exploration. These playful pursuits remind us that the pursuit of knowledge is not immune to whimsy and wonder, as we embark on our own quest to uncover the unexpected ties between sports personnel and public curiosity about tech titans.
As we embark on this literary odyssey, let us recall that truth often emerges from the most unexpected intersections, guiding us through the delightful maze of inquiry and insight. Our own undertaking to scrutinize the relationship between sports personnel in Puerto Rico and public intrigue toward tech tycoons mirrors the enchanting tales and scholarly pursuits that have long captivated the human quest for knowledge and connection.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our research data revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk.' Over the period spanning from 2005 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and an r-squared of 0.8521385, with a p-value of less than 0.01. These numbers not only reflect a strong statistical relationship but also hint at the compelling interplay of factors shaping public curiosity.
In Figure 1, a scatterplot visually illustrates the compelling correlation between the variables of interest. The clear clustering of data points reinforces the strength of the connection, affirming that the influence of sports personnel on the public's interest in tech luminaries is not merely a shot in the dark.
These results, while surprising at first glance, underscore the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. It seems that the realm of sports scouting may hold a hidden playbook for understanding the public's quest for insight into the enigmatic figures of the tech world. This revelation serves as a reminder that in the tapestry of human behavior, threads of fascination and fervor often weave themselves into unforeseen patterns, much like a thrilling plot twist in an unputdownable novel.
Upon closer examination, our findings prompt reflection on the mechanisms and motivators that steer public attention. One cannot help but ponder the peculiar dance of influences that molds our collective intrigue, akin to the intricate choreography of a synchronized swimming routine – where each movement, no matter how subtle, contributes to the larger spectacle.
These results shed light on the whimsical nature of human curiosity, prompting us to consider the myriad forces that shape our digital footprints. As we navigate the ever-expanding landscape of data exploration, we are reminded that even the unlikeliest pairs, much like a tandem of mismatched socks, can offer insights as profound as they are unexpected.
The implications of these findings beckon us to reimagine the bounds of influence and spark further investigations into the enigmatic interplay of sport and tech in shaping public interest. This curious connection uncovers yet another layer of complexity in the intricate tapestry of human behavior, challenging us to embrace the improbable and revel in the serendipitous links that underlie our quest for understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The resounding harmony in our results serves as another entrancing melody in the symphony of unanticipated correlations. As we traverse the terrain of our findings, we are compelled to consider the parallels to seemingly disparate domains – much like the fusion of baseball and rocket science. Our results align with the findings of Smith and Doe (2010), who uncovered the surprising link between celebrity dessert chefs and global ice cream consumption, suggesting that the realms of athletics and tech intrigue may share an unanticipated synchronicity akin to the meticulous choreography of synchronized swimming.

Moreover, our investigation echoes the lyrical wisdom of Douglas Adams in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," where the delightful absurdities of the universe are interwoven with threads of unexpected connections. The statistical robustness of our correlations is a testament to the interconnectedness of human pursuits, much like the intertwined plots of a mystery board game.

It is apparent that the presence of coaches and scouts acts as a gravitational force, drawing public curiosity toward elusive figures in the tech landscape. This peculiarity mirrors the serendipitous discoveries celebrated in fiction and scholarly works alike. The dance of influence that we have uncovered is a testament to the whimsical nature of human behavior, urging us to consider the myriad factors that compose the tapestry of public intrigue.

In essence, our findings underscore the playful unpredictability of the human mind and digital footprints, much like the wayward whims of a mismatched pair of socks. This revelatory connection between sports personnel and public curiosity about tech luminaries not only challenges traditional paradigms but also invites us to embrace the interconnected mysteries that shape our collective consciousness.

As we stand at the crossroads of sports and technology, our study stands as a reminder that truth often emerges from the most unexpected intersections, guiding us through the delightful maze of inquiry and insight. Our own undertaking to scrutinize the relationship between sports personnel in Puerto Rico and public intrigue toward tech titans mirrors the enchanting tales and scholarly pursuits that have long captivated the human quest for knowledge and connection. And who knows, maybe our next study will shed light on the connection between basketball referees and interest in astronomy – a truly out-of-this-world investigation indeed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and Google searches for 'who is elon musk'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Scouting for Silicon Valley: An Analysis of the Link between Sports Personnel and Public Interest in Tech Tycoons"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unsuspecting relationship between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk.' By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on this unconventional connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and p < 0.01 across the years 2005 to 2022, indicating a clear and statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. The implications of these unexpected results prompt further investigation and contemplation, challenging traditional paradigms and inviting us to consider the uncharted territories of influence on public curiosity. This sheds light on a curious case, reminding us that in the realm of research, truth is often stranger than fiction.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the multifaceted realm of human inquiry, the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, revealing links between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our research endeavors to explore one such serendipitous connection between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the public's intrigue surrounding the famed tech tycoon, Elon Musk. While this pairing may initially appear as incongruous as a mismatched pair of socks, our analysis aims to illustrate that in the landscape of data exploration, even the most unlikely pairings can yield fruitful insights.
As the digital age continues to flourish and technology permeates every facet of modern life, public fascination with the luminaries of the tech industry has surged. Meanwhile, Puerto Rico has long been associated more with surf and sand than silicon and semiconductors. Yet, beneath these divergent facades lie data points waiting to be correlated and patterns begging to be unearthed. Our inquiry seeks to bridge the gap between the fields of sports personnel and high-tech luminaries, inviting us to contemplate the unexpected interplay of factors that shape public curiosity.
This endeavor is not merely an exercise in statistical analysis and data mining; it is a journey of enigma and enlightenment. While our investigation may lead us through statistical thickets and labyrinthine correlation matrices, it is crucial to remember that at the heart of our pursuit lies the human penchant for curiosity and connection, much like a detective hot on the trail of an elusive suspect. The perplexing correlation that we reveal challenges our assumptions and beckons us to explore uncharted territories of influence, where the seemingly inconsequential actions of sports personnel in Puerto Rico exert an unexpected tug on the public's digital inquisitiveness.
As we embark on this quest of quirk and inquiry, let us remember that in the precarious balance between probability and paradox, truth often emerges as the most captivating puzzle piece of all. Join us as we unravel the curious case of scouting for Silicon Valley and ponder the quizzical ways in which our digital footsteps lead us down unexpected avenues of discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our research data revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk.' Over the period spanning from 2005 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and an r-squared of 0.8521385, with a p-value of less than 0.01. These numbers not only reflect a strong statistical relationship but also hint at the compelling interplay of factors shaping public curiosity.
In Figure 1, a scatterplot visually illustrates the compelling correlation between the variables of interest. The clear clustering of data points reinforces the strength of the connection, affirming that the influence of sports personnel on the public's interest in tech luminaries is not merely a shot in the dark.
These results, while surprising at first glance, underscore the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. It seems that the realm of sports scouting may hold a hidden playbook for understanding the public's quest for insight into the enigmatic figures of the tech world. This revelation serves as a reminder that in the tapestry of human behavior, threads of fascination and fervor often weave themselves into unforeseen patterns, much like a thrilling plot twist in an unputdownable novel.
Upon closer examination, our findings prompt reflection on the mechanisms and motivators that steer public attention. One cannot help but ponder the peculiar dance of influences that molds our collective intrigue, akin to the intricate choreography of a synchronized swimming routine – where each movement, no matter how subtle, contributes to the larger spectacle.
These results shed light on the whimsical nature of human curiosity, prompting us to consider the myriad forces that shape our digital footprints. As we navigate the ever-expanding landscape of data exploration, we are reminded that even the unlikeliest pairs, much like a tandem of mismatched socks, can offer insights as profound as they are unexpected.
The implications of these findings beckon us to reimagine the bounds of influence and spark further investigations into the enigmatic interplay of sport and tech in shaping public interest. This curious connection uncovers yet another layer of complexity in the intricate tapestry of human behavior, challenging us to embrace the improbable and revel in the serendipitous links that underlie our quest for understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk' has unveiled a remarkably strong and statistically significant relationship. While one might initially assume the two variables to be as incongruous as a basketball in a swimming pool, our findings have demonstrated otherwise. The interplay between seemingly unrelated domains, much like a surprise plot twist in an unexpected comedy, has sparked contemplation on the intricacies of public curiosity and the curious ways in which it manifests.

The unexpected nature of our results highlights the capriciousness of human behavior and the delightful surprises that emerge when we delve into the labyrinth of data exploration. This quirky connection urges us to reconsider the conventional boundaries of influence and to embrace the whimsical dance of factors that shape public interest, much like a flamboyant salsa number that defies expectations.

As we bid farewell to this captivating inquiry, we assert with confidence that no further research is needed in this area. After all, as William Shakespeare famously said, "All's well that ends well!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Scouting for Silicon Valley: An Analysis of the Link between Sports Personnel and Public Interest in Tech Tycoons. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Sports Sociology and Technology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Scouting for Silicon Valley: An Analysis of the Link between Sports Personnel and Public Interest in Tech Tycoons. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Applied Sports Sociology and Technology Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Scouting for Silicon Valley: An Analysis of the Link between Sports Personnel and Public Interest in Tech Tycoons with an abstract of This paper examines the unsuspecting relationship between the number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico and the frequency of Google searches for 'who is Elon Musk.' By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team sought to shed light on this unconventional connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9231135 and p < 0.01 across the years 2005 to 2022, indicating a clear and statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. The implications of these unexpected results prompt further investigation and contemplation, challenging traditional paradigms and inviting us to consider the uncharted territories of influence on public curiosity. This sheds light on a curious case, reminding us that in the realm of research, truth is often stranger than fiction.

ChatGPT:

Google Trends, Elon Musk, coaches, scouts, Puerto Rico, Bureau of Labor Statistics, public interest, tech tycoons, sports personnel

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico

Google searches for 'who is elon musk'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'who is elon musk' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'who is elon musk'

Correlation r = 0.9231135 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8521385 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'who is elon musk') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico) over the 18 years from 2005 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.8E-8. 0.0000000481484903801172900000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 4.8E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 20,769,083 random variables You don't actually need 20 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.8, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico (Coaches And Scouts)17014011017014017016020029037048065053047050045018601920
Google searches for 'who is elon musk' (Rel. search volume)0.750.08333330.08333330.09090910.1111110000.7511.583331.666673.666678.416676.0833315.416726.333343




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([170,140,110,170,140,170,160,200,290,370,480,650,530,470,500,450,1860,1920,])
array_2 = np.array([0.75,0.0833333,0.0833333,0.0909091,0.111111,0,0,0,0.75,1,1.58333,1.66667,3.66667,8.41667,6.08333,15.4167,26.3333,43,])
array_1_name = "The number of coaches and scouts in Puerto Rico"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'who is elon musk'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 2166 · Black Variable ID: 16699 · Red Variable ID: 1487
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0