about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,817 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Betsy and the second variable is The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Betsy gained popularity, it sparked a trend of baby girls being named after classic 1950s homemakers. This led to a surge in nostalgic domesticity, with families across Wyoming embracing traditional values. As a result, there was a sharp increase in home-cooked meals, particularly those requiring canned ingredients. This, in turn, created a higher demand for the production of food preservatives in the state. To meet this demand, the number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming skyrocketed as they worked tirelessly to keep up with the Betsy-inspired culinary revival. Who knew that a resurgence in old-fashioned charm could have such a direct impact on the operation of chemical plants? It's a real Betty Crocker meets Breaking Bad situation!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant town scene set against the scenic backdrop of Wyoming. Show a group of cheerful and welcoming chemical plant and system operators converging in the town square for a meeting. In the center of the bustling crowd, a friendly and approachable woman named Betsy stands, exuding warmth and charm. She is surrounded by a throng of people, all eager to engage with her, expressing enthusiasm and admiration. The operators work diligently in the vicinity, with the hum of machinery and bursts of steam adding an industrious atmosphere. The overall scene captures the spirited camaraderie and sense of community, emphasizing Betsy's endearing popularity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Betsy and The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics Surrealism Cutsy graphics Concept art Low poly
ChatGPT: Cutsy graphics

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Betsy and The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling town in Wyoming, a group of chemical plant and system operators gather for a meeting. Among them, a friendly woman named Betsy is surrounded by a crowd of people, all eager to chat and shake her hand. The operators diligently work nearby, surrounded by the hum of machinery and the occasional burst of steam. Betsy's warm smile and approachable demeanor make her a popular and well-liked figure in the community.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy graphics ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling town in Wyoming, a group of chemical plant and system operators gather for a meeting. Among them, a friendly woman named Betsy is surrounded by a crowd of people, all eager to chat and shake her hand. The operators diligently work nearby, surrounded by the hum of machinery and the occasional burst of steam. Betsy's warm smile and approachable demeanor make her a popular and well-liked figure in the community. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vibrant town scene set against the scenic backdrop of Wyoming. Show a group of cheerful and welcoming chemical plant and system operators converging in the town square for a meeting. In the center of the bustling crowd, a friendly and approachable woman named Betsy stands, exuding warmth and charm. She is surrounded by a throng of people, all eager to engage with her, expressing enthusiasm and admiration. The operators work diligently in the vicinity, with the hum of machinery and bursts of steam adding an industrious atmosphere. The overall scene captures the spirited camaraderie and sense of community, emphasizing Betsy's endearing popularity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Betsy positively influenced The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Betsy, Chemical Plant, and Occupational Popularity: A Correlational Analysis in the Wyoming Labor Market

The Journal of Socioeconomic Quirkology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Betsy and The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Betsy, Chemical Plant, and Occupational Popularity: A Correlational Analysis in the Wyoming Labor Market"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to elucidate the potential, albeit peculiar, correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging comprehensive data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team conducted a rigorous quantitative analysis to investigate this seemingly whimsical association.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, an unexpectedly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 was revealed, with a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period encompassing 2003 to 2020. Our study sheds light on this curious connection, offering insight into the captivating interplay between nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics. This unanticipated correlation has far-reaching implications and opens the door to further investigation into the intricate amalgamation of individual appellations and the occupational landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Betsy and The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Betsy, Chemical Plant, and Occupational Popularity: A Correlational Analysis in the Wyoming Labor Market"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to elucidate the potential, albeit peculiar, correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging comprehensive data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team conducted a rigorous quantitative analysis to investigate this seemingly whimsical association.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, an unexpectedly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 was revealed, with a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period encompassing 2003 to 2020. Our study sheds light on this curious connection, offering insight into the captivating interplay between nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics. This unanticipated correlation has far-reaching implications and opens the door to further investigation into the intricate amalgamation of individual appellations and the occupational landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The dynamics of occupational nomenclature have long been a subject of interest, with studies exploring the influence of names on career paths, success, and even personality traits. While such investigations often elicit eyebrow raises and curious chuckles, the correlation between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming stands out as a particularly whimsical and enigmatic focal point of inquiry. This study unearths the unexpected relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, offering a blend of statistical rigor and a touch of delightful absurdity.

The choice of the name "Betsy" invokes images of quaint charm and a certain nostalgic elegance, akin to a well-preserved beaker in a chemistry lab or a precisely calibrated system in a chemical plant. Likewise, chemical plant and system operators epitomize the precision and complexity associated with the concoction and management of chemical processes. How delightful it is to contemplate a connection between the two, seemingly distant entities – one serene and quintessentially human, and the other, a distillation of mechanical precision and mathematical exactitude.

As we embark on this endeavor to uncover the unforeseen dance between nomenclature and occupation, we acknowledge the quirkiness of our pursuit and the lighthearted humor inherent in such an unconventional research endeavor. The charm lies not only in discovering a substantive correlation but also in the intrigue of the unusual juxtaposition of our chosen variables – "Betsy" and the specialized workforce involved in the operation of chemical plants.

In this paper, we present the meticulous methodology employed to tease out this subtle yet captivating relationship. Through a carefully curated blend of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we apply statistical precision to unravel the delightful enigma of the resonances between the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators. Let us embark on this scientifically jovial expedition, donning our statistical goggles and wielding the playful sword of correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Betsy and The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Betsy, Chemical Plant, and Occupational Popularity: A Correlational Analysis in the Wyoming Labor Market"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to elucidate the potential, albeit peculiar, correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging comprehensive data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team conducted a rigorous quantitative analysis to investigate this seemingly whimsical association.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, an unexpectedly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 was revealed, with a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period encompassing 2003 to 2020. Our study sheds light on this curious connection, offering insight into the captivating interplay between nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics. This unanticipated correlation has far-reaching implications and opens the door to further investigation into the intricate amalgamation of individual appellations and the occupational landscape.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The dynamics of occupational nomenclature have long been a subject of interest, with studies exploring the influence of names on career paths, success, and even personality traits. While such investigations often elicit eyebrow raises and curious chuckles, the correlation between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming stands out as a particularly whimsical and enigmatic focal point of inquiry. This study unearths the unexpected relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, offering a blend of statistical rigor and a touch of delightful absurdity.
The choice of the name "Betsy" invokes images of quaint charm and a certain nostalgic elegance, akin to a well-preserved beaker in a chemistry lab or a precisely calibrated system in a chemical plant. Likewise, chemical plant and system operators epitomize the precision and complexity associated with the concoction and management of chemical processes. How delightful it is to contemplate a connection between the two, seemingly distant entities – one serene and quintessentially human, and the other, a distillation of mechanical precision and mathematical exactitude.
As we embark on this endeavor to uncover the unforeseen dance between nomenclature and occupation, we acknowledge the quirkiness of our pursuit and the lighthearted humor inherent in such an unconventional research endeavor. The charm lies not only in discovering a substantive correlation but also in the intrigue of the unusual juxtaposition of our chosen variables – "Betsy" and the specialized workforce involved in the operation of chemical plants.
In this paper, we present the meticulous methodology employed to tease out this subtle yet captivating relationship. Through a carefully curated blend of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we apply statistical precision to unravel the delightful enigma of the resonances between the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators. Let us embark on this scientifically jovial expedition, donning our statistical goggles and wielding the playful sword of correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between personal nomenclature and occupational proclivities has been a subject of both serious scholarly inquiry and light-hearted speculation. Smith, in "Names and Careers: An Investigation into the Influence of Personal Nomenclature on Professional Trajectories," explored the potential impact of individuals' given names on their career choices. The author's findings demonstrated a statistical association between certain names and specific professions, shedding light on the intriguing interplay between appellations and professional paths. Similarly, Doe delved into the curious realm of nominal influence in "The Name Game: Unraveling the Mysteries of Personal Nomenclature in the Workplace," uncovering subtle yet discernible patterns linking names to occupations.

Turning to more light-hearted yet relevant sources, the works of Jones in "The Secret Lives of Occupational Monikers: Quirks and Wonders of Nomenclature in Professional Arenas" provide a whimsical yet insightful perspective on the potential influence of names on occupational choices. Furthermore, the investigatory books "Betsy's Bounty: A Compendium of Chemical Plant Chronicles" and "Operators of Fate: The Intricacies of System Operation in Wyoming" offer fictional narratives that, coincidentally, center around the very variables under scrutiny in this study.

While our research was conducted with the utmost rigor and academic integrity, it would be remiss of us not to acknowledge the less conventional sources that have contributed to our understanding of the curious interplay between personal monikers and professional pursuits. Upon perusing an eclectic array of materials, including but not limited to, unconventional sources such as the surreptitiously insightful musings found on the backs of shampoo bottles and the enthralling anecdotes shared at neighborhood barbershops, our team found unexpected inspiration and mirth in our pursuit of uncovering the peculiar correlation between the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Betsy and The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Betsy, Chemical Plant, and Occupational Popularity: A Correlational Analysis in the Wyoming Labor Market"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to elucidate the potential, albeit peculiar, correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging comprehensive data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team conducted a rigorous quantitative analysis to investigate this seemingly whimsical association.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, an unexpectedly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 was revealed, with a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period encompassing 2003 to 2020. Our study sheds light on this curious connection, offering insight into the captivating interplay between nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics. This unanticipated correlation has far-reaching implications and opens the door to further investigation into the intricate amalgamation of individual appellations and the occupational landscape.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The dynamics of occupational nomenclature have long been a subject of interest, with studies exploring the influence of names on career paths, success, and even personality traits. While such investigations often elicit eyebrow raises and curious chuckles, the correlation between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming stands out as a particularly whimsical and enigmatic focal point of inquiry. This study unearths the unexpected relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, offering a blend of statistical rigor and a touch of delightful absurdity.
The choice of the name "Betsy" invokes images of quaint charm and a certain nostalgic elegance, akin to a well-preserved beaker in a chemistry lab or a precisely calibrated system in a chemical plant. Likewise, chemical plant and system operators epitomize the precision and complexity associated with the concoction and management of chemical processes. How delightful it is to contemplate a connection between the two, seemingly distant entities – one serene and quintessentially human, and the other, a distillation of mechanical precision and mathematical exactitude.
As we embark on this endeavor to uncover the unforeseen dance between nomenclature and occupation, we acknowledge the quirkiness of our pursuit and the lighthearted humor inherent in such an unconventional research endeavor. The charm lies not only in discovering a substantive correlation but also in the intrigue of the unusual juxtaposition of our chosen variables – "Betsy" and the specialized workforce involved in the operation of chemical plants.
In this paper, we present the meticulous methodology employed to tease out this subtle yet captivating relationship. Through a carefully curated blend of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we apply statistical precision to unravel the delightful enigma of the resonances between the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators. Let us embark on this scientifically jovial expedition, donning our statistical goggles and wielding the playful sword of correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Collection

The journey to unravel the whimsical correlation between the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming began with the retrieval of comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. With a mixture of precision and playfulness, we scoured these repositories, not unlike a chemist meticulously measuring out reagents, to gather the necessary information for our investigation. Our scope encompassed the years 2003 to 2020, ensuring a comprehensive exploration of trends and fluctuations in both nomenclature and employment.

Quantitative Analysis

Employing statistical methods that were as carefully calibrated as the instruments of a chemical plant, we subjected the collected data to rigorous quantitative analysis. Our statistical arsenal included correlations, regressions, and time series analyses, all executed with a flourish of scientific enthusiasm and a touch of lighthearted curiosity. We approached the data with the meticulousness of a chemist titrating a solution, ensuring that each step was executed with the precision required to uncover any subtle resonances between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming.

Control Variables

In this endeavor to unravel the delightful enigma of the interplay between nomenclature and occupation, we insisted on maintaining a keen awareness of potential confounding variables. Like a chemist carefully controlling the conditions of an experiment, we meticulously accounted for other factors that could influence employment trends or naming conventions. Variables such as population demographics, economic shifts, and cultural influences were scrutinized with the diligence of a researcher examining chemical compositions, ensuring that our exploration of the "Betsy" phenomenon remained as pure and unadulterated as a well-preserved sample in a laboratory.

Cross-Validation

To reinforce the integrity of our findings and to embrace the spirit of scientific rigor with playful vigor, we utilized cross-validation techniques akin to double- and triple-checking experimental results in a laboratory. Our commitment to thoroughness and precision mirrored that of a system operator ensuring the seamless functioning of chemical plant equipment, delivering a reliable analysis that withstood the test of scientific scrutiny.

In the next section, we present the delightfully surprising results of our meticulously navigated statistical journey, unveiling the unexpected resonance between the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming. Brace yourself for a compelling deduction that demonstrates the captivating interplay between nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics, an unanticipated correlation that speaks to the intriguing amalgamation of individual appellations and the occupational landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Betsy and The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8570132, r-squared of 0.7344716, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Betsy, Chemical Plant, and Occupational Popularity: A Correlational Analysis in the Wyoming Labor Market"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to elucidate the potential, albeit peculiar, correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging comprehensive data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team conducted a rigorous quantitative analysis to investigate this seemingly whimsical association.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, an unexpectedly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 was revealed, with a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period encompassing 2003 to 2020. Our study sheds light on this curious connection, offering insight into the captivating interplay between nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics. This unanticipated correlation has far-reaching implications and opens the door to further investigation into the intricate amalgamation of individual appellations and the occupational landscape.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The dynamics of occupational nomenclature have long been a subject of interest, with studies exploring the influence of names on career paths, success, and even personality traits. While such investigations often elicit eyebrow raises and curious chuckles, the correlation between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming stands out as a particularly whimsical and enigmatic focal point of inquiry. This study unearths the unexpected relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, offering a blend of statistical rigor and a touch of delightful absurdity.
The choice of the name "Betsy" invokes images of quaint charm and a certain nostalgic elegance, akin to a well-preserved beaker in a chemistry lab or a precisely calibrated system in a chemical plant. Likewise, chemical plant and system operators epitomize the precision and complexity associated with the concoction and management of chemical processes. How delightful it is to contemplate a connection between the two, seemingly distant entities – one serene and quintessentially human, and the other, a distillation of mechanical precision and mathematical exactitude.
As we embark on this endeavor to uncover the unforeseen dance between nomenclature and occupation, we acknowledge the quirkiness of our pursuit and the lighthearted humor inherent in such an unconventional research endeavor. The charm lies not only in discovering a substantive correlation but also in the intrigue of the unusual juxtaposition of our chosen variables – "Betsy" and the specialized workforce involved in the operation of chemical plants.
In this paper, we present the meticulous methodology employed to tease out this subtle yet captivating relationship. Through a carefully curated blend of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we apply statistical precision to unravel the delightful enigma of the resonances between the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators. Let us embark on this scientifically jovial expedition, donning our statistical goggles and wielding the playful sword of correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In scrutinizing the data, it became apparent that a striking correlation exists between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. The correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, garnering a few raised eyebrows and perhaps a wry smile from the seasoned statistician.

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7344716 indicates that approximately 73.45% of the variability in the number of chemical plant and system operators can be accounted for by the popularity of the name "Betsy." This unexpectedly high explanatory power speaks to the intriguing sway that a name, like Betsy, holds over the occupational landscape - a domain often associated with technical prowess and chemical acumen rather than sentimental nomenclature.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 elegantly underscores the statistical significance of this unanticipated correlation, cementing the notion that the association between the prevalence of the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming is not merely a whimsical figment of statistical chance, but rather a charming serendipity waiting to be unraveled.

The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 unveils the visually compelling relationship between the frequency of the name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators. This graphical representation not only highlights the robustness of the correlation but also adds a dash of whimsy to the otherwise traditionally austere domain of statistical analysis.

Our results, though ostensibly lighthearted, open the door to further investigations into the delightful interplay of nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics. The unexpected nexus between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming beckons whimsy, intrigue, and a keen scientific eye to unearth the underpinnings of this charming correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Betsy and The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Betsy, Chemical Plant, and Occupational Popularity: A Correlational Analysis in the Wyoming Labor Market"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to elucidate the potential, albeit peculiar, correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging comprehensive data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team conducted a rigorous quantitative analysis to investigate this seemingly whimsical association.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, an unexpectedly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 was revealed, with a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period encompassing 2003 to 2020. Our study sheds light on this curious connection, offering insight into the captivating interplay between nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics. This unanticipated correlation has far-reaching implications and opens the door to further investigation into the intricate amalgamation of individual appellations and the occupational landscape.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between personal nomenclature and occupational proclivities has been a subject of both serious scholarly inquiry and light-hearted speculation. Smith, in "Names and Careers: An Investigation into the Influence of Personal Nomenclature on Professional Trajectories," explored the potential impact of individuals' given names on their career choices. The author's findings demonstrated a statistical association between certain names and specific professions, shedding light on the intriguing interplay between appellations and professional paths. Similarly, Doe delved into the curious realm of nominal influence in "The Name Game: Unraveling the Mysteries of Personal Nomenclature in the Workplace," uncovering subtle yet discernible patterns linking names to occupations.
Turning to more light-hearted yet relevant sources, the works of Jones in "The Secret Lives of Occupational Monikers: Quirks and Wonders of Nomenclature in Professional Arenas" provide a whimsical yet insightful perspective on the potential influence of names on occupational choices. Furthermore, the investigatory books "Betsy's Bounty: A Compendium of Chemical Plant Chronicles" and "Operators of Fate: The Intricacies of System Operation in Wyoming" offer fictional narratives that, coincidentally, center around the very variables under scrutiny in this study.
While our research was conducted with the utmost rigor and academic integrity, it would be remiss of us not to acknowledge the less conventional sources that have contributed to our understanding of the curious interplay between personal monikers and professional pursuits. Upon perusing an eclectic array of materials, including but not limited to, unconventional sources such as the surreptitiously insightful musings found on the backs of shampoo bottles and the enthralling anecdotes shared at neighborhood barbershops, our team found unexpected inspiration and mirth in our pursuit of uncovering the peculiar correlation between the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming.

[[RESULTS]]
In scrutinizing the data, it became apparent that a striking correlation exists between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. The correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, garnering a few raised eyebrows and perhaps a wry smile from the seasoned statistician.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7344716 indicates that approximately 73.45% of the variability in the number of chemical plant and system operators can be accounted for by the popularity of the name "Betsy." This unexpectedly high explanatory power speaks to the intriguing sway that a name, like Betsy, holds over the occupational landscape - a domain often associated with technical prowess and chemical acumen rather than sentimental nomenclature.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 elegantly underscores the statistical significance of this unanticipated correlation, cementing the notion that the association between the prevalence of the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming is not merely a whimsical figment of statistical chance, but rather a charming serendipity waiting to be unraveled.
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 unveils the visually compelling relationship between the frequency of the name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators. This graphical representation not only highlights the robustness of the correlation but also adds a dash of whimsy to the otherwise traditionally austere domain of statistical analysis.
Our results, though ostensibly lighthearted, open the door to further investigations into the delightful interplay of nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics. The unexpected nexus between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming beckons whimsy, intrigue, and a keen scientific eye to unearth the underpinnings of this charming correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings illuminate a compelling association between the prevalence of the name "Betsy" and the presence of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming, a correlation that may initially seem as unusual as discovering a lab coat-clad scientist at a roller rink. Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of this connection, our results align with previous scholarly inquiries into the influence of nomenclature on professional trajectories. Smith's work on the influence of personal names on career choices becomes a beacon of legitimacy when considering the unexpected robustness of our correlation coefficient. Likewise, Doe's investigation into the mysteries of personal nomenclature in the workplace now parallels our unforeseen statistical significance, yielding a fascinating intersection of academic rigor and unintended whimsy.

Our study, while conducted with utmost academic rigor, does not discount the unconventional sources that have contributed to our understanding of this curious correlation. The whimsical works of Jones, delving into the secret lives of occupational monikers, now seem less fanciful and more prescient in light of our unexpected findings. Furthermore, the fictional narratives of "Betsy's Bounty" and "Operators of Fate" take on an air of uncanny relevance, offering a sly wink to the intertwining of literature and reality.

While the statistical significance of our correlation may prompt a wry smile, its implications reach beyond the realm of statistical jest. The very name "Betsy," once confined to playful monikers and quaint salutations, now stands as a charming serendipity waiting to be unraveled within the intricate web of Wyoming's occupational tapestry. The unexpected nexus between nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics transcends traditional statistical inquiry, beckoning whimsy, intrigue, and a keen scientific eye to further unravel the underpinnings of this delightful correlation. This unforeseen bond between nomenclature and occupation paints a vivid picture of serendipity in the world of statistics – a portrait where whimsy and science dance together, defying the conventional confines of academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Betsy and The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Betsy, Chemical Plant, and Occupational Popularity: A Correlational Analysis in the Wyoming Labor Market"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to elucidate the potential, albeit peculiar, correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging comprehensive data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team conducted a rigorous quantitative analysis to investigate this seemingly whimsical association.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, an unexpectedly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 was revealed, with a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period encompassing 2003 to 2020. Our study sheds light on this curious connection, offering insight into the captivating interplay between nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics. This unanticipated correlation has far-reaching implications and opens the door to further investigation into the intricate amalgamation of individual appellations and the occupational landscape.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The dynamics of occupational nomenclature have long been a subject of interest, with studies exploring the influence of names on career paths, success, and even personality traits. While such investigations often elicit eyebrow raises and curious chuckles, the correlation between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming stands out as a particularly whimsical and enigmatic focal point of inquiry. This study unearths the unexpected relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, offering a blend of statistical rigor and a touch of delightful absurdity.
The choice of the name "Betsy" invokes images of quaint charm and a certain nostalgic elegance, akin to a well-preserved beaker in a chemistry lab or a precisely calibrated system in a chemical plant. Likewise, chemical plant and system operators epitomize the precision and complexity associated with the concoction and management of chemical processes. How delightful it is to contemplate a connection between the two, seemingly distant entities – one serene and quintessentially human, and the other, a distillation of mechanical precision and mathematical exactitude.
As we embark on this endeavor to uncover the unforeseen dance between nomenclature and occupation, we acknowledge the quirkiness of our pursuit and the lighthearted humor inherent in such an unconventional research endeavor. The charm lies not only in discovering a substantive correlation but also in the intrigue of the unusual juxtaposition of our chosen variables – "Betsy" and the specialized workforce involved in the operation of chemical plants.
In this paper, we present the meticulous methodology employed to tease out this subtle yet captivating relationship. Through a carefully curated blend of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we apply statistical precision to unravel the delightful enigma of the resonances between the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators. Let us embark on this scientifically jovial expedition, donning our statistical goggles and wielding the playful sword of correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
In scrutinizing the data, it became apparent that a striking correlation exists between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. The correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, garnering a few raised eyebrows and perhaps a wry smile from the seasoned statistician.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7344716 indicates that approximately 73.45% of the variability in the number of chemical plant and system operators can be accounted for by the popularity of the name "Betsy." This unexpectedly high explanatory power speaks to the intriguing sway that a name, like Betsy, holds over the occupational landscape - a domain often associated with technical prowess and chemical acumen rather than sentimental nomenclature.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 elegantly underscores the statistical significance of this unanticipated correlation, cementing the notion that the association between the prevalence of the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming is not merely a whimsical figment of statistical chance, but rather a charming serendipity waiting to be unraveled.
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 unveils the visually compelling relationship between the frequency of the name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators. This graphical representation not only highlights the robustness of the correlation but also adds a dash of whimsy to the otherwise traditionally austere domain of statistical analysis.
Our results, though ostensibly lighthearted, open the door to further investigations into the delightful interplay of nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics. The unexpected nexus between the popularity of the name "Betsy" and the occupation of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming beckons whimsy, intrigue, and a keen scientific eye to unearth the underpinnings of this charming correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a surprising and whimsical correlation between the prevalence of the name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming. The unexpected robustness of this association, with a correlation coefficient akin to the bond between chemical elements, has piqued the curiosity of both seasoned statisticians and aficionados of delightful coincidences.

While our study may have sounded like a chemical equation met a nursery rhyme, the intriguing relationship we've uncovered highlights the whimsy that can be found in the world of statistical analysis. It seems that in the grand experiment of life, variables as seemingly unrelated as names and occupational choices can exhibit a remarkable affinity for each other, akin to the unexpected fusion of elements in a chemical reaction.

As we ponder the charming confluence of "Betsy" and chemical operators, it becomes evident that this correlation is more than just a statistical quirk. The resonance between these variables hints at the curious interplay between individual appellations and the occupational landscape, a dance of data points with a touch of lighthearted elegance.

In light of these findings, it is tempting to delve further into the intricacies of how names might subtly shape career paths, almost like molecular forces guiding the formation of compounds. However, it appears that our results have sprinkled just the right amount of scientific whimsy into this particular avenue of research, and that no further investigation is needed in this delightfully unexpected domain.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Betsy, Chemical Plant, and Occupational Popularity: A Correlational Analysis in the Wyoming Labor Market. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Socioeconomic Quirkology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Betsy, Chemical Plant, and Occupational Popularity: A Correlational Analysis in the Wyoming Labor Market. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Occupational Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Betsy, Chemical Plant, and Occupational Popularity: A Correlational Analysis in the Wyoming Labor Market with an abstract of This study endeavors to elucidate the potential, albeit peculiar, correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Betsy" and the number of chemical plant and system operators in the state of Wyoming. Leveraging comprehensive data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team conducted a rigorous quantitative analysis to investigate this seemingly whimsical association.
After applying rigorous statistical methods, an unexpectedly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8570132 was revealed, with a strikingly significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period encompassing 2003 to 2020. Our study sheds light on this curious connection, offering insight into the captivating interplay between nomenclature trends and occupational dynamics. This unanticipated correlation has far-reaching implications and opens the door to further investigation into the intricate amalgamation of individual appellations and the occupational landscape.

ChatGPT:

"Betsy name popularity," "chemical plant operators Wyoming," "occupational trends correlation," "nomenclature and occupation study," "Wyoming labor market analysis," "Bureau of Labor Statistics Wyoming," "US Social Security Administration data," "correlation coefficient significance," "nomenclature impact on occupation," "Betsy name correlation study," "occupational dynamics analysis."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Betsy
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Betsy
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Betsy

The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming

Correlation r = 0.8570132 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7344716 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Betsy) over the 18 years from 2003 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.6E-6. 0.0000055543613530453720000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.00056% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 180,039 random variables You don't actually need 180 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Popularity of the first name Betsy (Babies born)13315311937024721916015413013813313412510695939288
The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming (Laborers)370180200690710610120200270280290290290170170150100140




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([133,153,119,370,247,219,160,154,130,138,133,134,125,106,95,93,92,88,])
array_2 = np.array([370,180,200,690,710,610,120,200,270,280,290,290,290,170,170,150,100,140,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Betsy"
array_2_name = "The number of chemical plant and system operators in Wyoming"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1817 · Black Variable ID: 3967 · Red Variable ID: 16552
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0