about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,739 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Jamila and the second variable is Air quality in Phoenix.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Jamila fell out of favor, people started using the phrase "Ja-mildew-a" instead, unknowingly conjuring up humid and smoggy conditions in Phoenix. This linguistic shift led to an increase in indoor air freshener use, creating a demand for aerosols that wafted all the way to Arizona, contributing to the decrease in air quality. Remember, it's not just about being Jamila-friendly, it's also about being eco-friendly!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a whimsical 2D animation depicting a bustling park scene in Phoenix. Show a group of smiling friends gathered around a picnic table amid bright sunshine. Display a colorful banner with "Jamila" written on it, fluttering above the friends, indicating a popular event nearby. In the background, depict the city with clear, fresh air and a warm glow cast by the sun, emphasizing good air quality in Phoenix. The animation should emphasize a cheerful and vibrant atmosphere, capturing the joy of friends enjoying each other's company in a beautiful outdoor setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Jamila and Good air quality in Phoenix. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic A scene from Skyrim Cute 2D animation Art nouveau Magic realism
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Jamila and Good air quality in Phoenix together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling park in Phoenix, a group of smiling friends sit around a picnic table, enjoying the sunshine. A banner flutters above them with the name "Jamila" written in colorful letters, indicating a popular event happening nearby. In the background, the air is clear and fresh, with the sun casting a warm glow over the city, illustrating good air quality in Phoenix.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling park in Phoenix, a group of smiling friends sit around a picnic table, enjoying the sunshine. A banner flutters above them with the name "Jamila" written in colorful letters, indicating a popular event happening nearby. In the background, the air is clear and fresh, with the sun casting a warm glow over the city, illustrating good air quality in Phoenix. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a whimsical 2D animation depicting a bustling park scene in Phoenix. Show a group of smiling friends gathered around a picnic table amid bright sunshine. Display a colorful banner with "Jamila" written on it, fluttering above the friends, indicating a popular event nearby. In the background, depict the city with clear, fresh air and a warm glow cast by the sun, emphasizing good air quality in Phoenix. The animation should emphasize a cheerful and vibrant atmosphere, capturing the joy of friends enjoying each other's company in a beautiful outdoor setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Jamila caused Air quality in Phoenix to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Jamila's Jam: A Breath of Fresh Air in Phoenix

The Journal of Environmental Eclecticism

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamila and Air quality in Phoenix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Jamila's Jam: A Breath of Fresh Air in Phoenix

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the remarkable correlation between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona. We took a lungful of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to delve into this curious connection. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503, leaving us breathless with excitement, and with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022. Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Jamila has soared, so has the perceived air quality in Phoenix, leaving us to ponder if there's something in a name that truly does bring a breath of fresh air. We hope this study tickles your funny bone and leaves you pondering the unexpected connections that exist in our world. Breathe easy, for the Jamila effect seems to be clear as air in Phoenix!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamila and Air quality in Phoenix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jamila's Jam: A Breath of Fresh Air in Phoenix

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the remarkable correlation between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona. We took a lungful of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to delve into this curious connection. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503, leaving us breathless with excitement, and with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022. Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Jamila has soared, so has the perceived air quality in Phoenix, leaving us to ponder if there's something in a name that truly does bring a breath of fresh air. We hope this study tickles your funny bone and leaves you pondering the unexpected connections that exist in our world. Breathe easy, for the Jamila effect seems to be clear as air in Phoenix!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Welcome, dear reader, to a world of whimsy and wonder, where the air is clear, and the first names are correlated with air quality. Today, we embark on a scientific journey that may leave you scratching your head or simply saying, "What in the fresh air is this all about?" We are delving into the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona.

Now, you may be thinking, "What's in a name?" But hold your breath—pun intended—as we unravel the mysteries behind the Jamila phenomenon. From the dusty depths of Phoenix to the heights of statistical analysis, we seek to uncover whether there's truly a breath of fresh air associated with this charming moniker.

The rationale behind this study was not born out of thin air. Rather, it stems from the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7964503 that emerged when plumbing the depths of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency. Picture this: a cloud of data, swirling with statistical significance and airy implications, that left us breathless with excitement (and perhaps a touch of confusion).

As the curtains rise on our quirky investigation, we invite you to suspend disbelief and revel in the unexpected connections that weave through our everyday existence. Take a deep breath, for the Jamila effect beckons us to explore the whimsical juncture where human nomenclature meets atmospheric purity. So, buckle up and hold your breath (figuratively speaking, of course), for the Jamila's Jam promises to be an exhilarating journey into the realms of correlations and comedic curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamila and Air quality in Phoenix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jamila's Jam: A Breath of Fresh Air in Phoenix

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the remarkable correlation between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona. We took a lungful of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to delve into this curious connection. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503, leaving us breathless with excitement, and with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022. Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Jamila has soared, so has the perceived air quality in Phoenix, leaving us to ponder if there's something in a name that truly does bring a breath of fresh air. We hope this study tickles your funny bone and leaves you pondering the unexpected connections that exist in our world. Breathe easy, for the Jamila effect seems to be clear as air in Phoenix!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, dear reader, to a world of whimsy and wonder, where the air is clear, and the first names are correlated with air quality. Today, we embark on a scientific journey that may leave you scratching your head or simply saying, "What in the fresh air is this all about?" We are delving into the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona.
Now, you may be thinking, "What's in a name?" But hold your breath—pun intended—as we unravel the mysteries behind the Jamila phenomenon. From the dusty depths of Phoenix to the heights of statistical analysis, we seek to uncover whether there's truly a breath of fresh air associated with this charming moniker.
The rationale behind this study was not born out of thin air. Rather, it stems from the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7964503 that emerged when plumbing the depths of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency. Picture this: a cloud of data, swirling with statistical significance and airy implications, that left us breathless with excitement (and perhaps a touch of confusion).
As the curtains rise on our quirky investigation, we invite you to suspend disbelief and revel in the unexpected connections that weave through our everyday existence. Take a deep breath, for the Jamila effect beckons us to explore the whimsical juncture where human nomenclature meets atmospheric purity. So, buckle up and hold your breath (figuratively speaking, of course), for the Jamila's Jam promises to be an exhilarating journey into the realms of correlations and comedic curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In a study conducted by Smith et al., the authors find a surprising link between the popularity of the first name Jamila and environmental factors in urban areas. While their study didn't directly investigate the air quality in Phoenix, their findings hinted at the potential for peculiar correlations between names and atmospheric conditions. Similarly, Doe's research on sociocultural influences on naming trends presents compelling evidence that the choice of a name can reflect and even impact broader societal shifts, including environmental attitudes.

Jones delves into the intriguing world of name meanings and their cultural significance. While Jones' work doesn't explicitly touch on air quality, it does tap into the notion that names hold a certain power over perception and behavior. Could it be that the mere presence of "Jamila" in the desert air of Phoenix brings forth a sense of freshness and purity? It's a tantalizing thought, to say the least.

Moving beyond the scholarly realm, let's turn our attention to non-fiction works that may offer insight into the Jamila phenomenon. "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Guide to Atmospheric Dynamics" by Lorem and Ipsum provides a comprehensive overview of the intricate dynamics that govern air quality. However, their work regrettably doesn't include a section on the impact of names on the composition of the atmosphere.

On a lighter note, fiction also has its role to play in shedding light on our curious inquiry. "The Name Effect" by Fictional Author and "Atmospheric Alchemy" by Imaginary Writer are two whimsical tales that weave together the mystical influence of names and the ethereal elements of the sky. While these books are products of literary imagination, they beckon us to ponder the playful possibilities of the Jamila-air quality correlation.

Turning to the realm of animated entertainment, the quintessential children's show "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" may seem a world away from our air quality study. Yet, amidst the colorful adventures and environmental messages, there's a subtle nod to the idea that individual actions can ripple into broader environmental impacts. Plus, who wouldn't want Captain Planet to swoop in and proclaim, "By your powers combined, I am Captain Clean Air!"?

Similarly, the classic cartoon "The Magic School Bus" takes young viewers on wacky educational escapades. While the show doesn't explicitly cover the link between names and air quality, it does instill in its audience a keen sense of curiosity about scientific phenomena. Perhaps Ms. Frizzle and her students could hop aboard the magical bus to explore the enigmatic connection between Jamila and air quality in Phoenix.

In sum, the literature offers a varied tapestry of insights and imagination, from scholarly musings to fanciful fables, that invites us to consider the unexpected wonders that may be at play in our study of the Jamila-air quality correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamila and Air quality in Phoenix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1980 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jamila's Jam: A Breath of Fresh Air in Phoenix

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the remarkable correlation between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona. We took a lungful of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to delve into this curious connection. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503, leaving us breathless with excitement, and with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022. Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Jamila has soared, so has the perceived air quality in Phoenix, leaving us to ponder if there's something in a name that truly does bring a breath of fresh air. We hope this study tickles your funny bone and leaves you pondering the unexpected connections that exist in our world. Breathe easy, for the Jamila effect seems to be clear as air in Phoenix!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, dear reader, to a world of whimsy and wonder, where the air is clear, and the first names are correlated with air quality. Today, we embark on a scientific journey that may leave you scratching your head or simply saying, "What in the fresh air is this all about?" We are delving into the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona.
Now, you may be thinking, "What's in a name?" But hold your breath—pun intended—as we unravel the mysteries behind the Jamila phenomenon. From the dusty depths of Phoenix to the heights of statistical analysis, we seek to uncover whether there's truly a breath of fresh air associated with this charming moniker.
The rationale behind this study was not born out of thin air. Rather, it stems from the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7964503 that emerged when plumbing the depths of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency. Picture this: a cloud of data, swirling with statistical significance and airy implications, that left us breathless with excitement (and perhaps a touch of confusion).
As the curtains rise on our quirky investigation, we invite you to suspend disbelief and revel in the unexpected connections that weave through our everyday existence. Take a deep breath, for the Jamila effect beckons us to explore the whimsical juncture where human nomenclature meets atmospheric purity. So, buckle up and hold your breath (figuratively speaking, of course), for the Jamila's Jam promises to be an exhilarating journey into the realms of correlations and comedic curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our whimsical journey into the world of air quality and nomenclature, we first had to wrangle and wriggle the data into shape. Our team decided to take the bull by the horns and sought out data sources that were as diverse and dynamic as the winds that sweep across the desert. We scoured the depths of the United States Social Security Administration's treasure trove of first names, wrangling and wrestling with databases to extract the popularity of the name Jamila from 1980 to 2022.

But wait, we didn't stop there! With a sense of purpose akin to a tumbleweed rolling through the Arizona desert, we ventured into the lair of the Environmental Protection Agency, where we unearthed a plethora of air quality data for Phoenix. Like intrepid adventurers, we gathered data on pollutants such as ozone, particulate matter, and carbon monoxide, spanning the same time frame.

Now, to make the leap from data collection to analysis, we had to roll up our sleeves and don our statistical thinking caps. We corralled the mounds of data into a formidable analytical herd, with the trusty statistical software acting as our lasso, guiding these wild numbers into coherence. Our spurs jingled as we trotted into the realm of correlation analysis, where we pored over the data with the keen eye of a hawk surveying the desert landscape.

Through the dusty haze of statistical inference, we computed correlation coefficients and p-values with the fervor of a prospector seeking gold. His breathless anticipation is not unlike our own, as we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503 and a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us gasping for breath. Our data wrangling and statistical escapades distilled into a captivating tale of statistical significance, where the name Jamila and air quality in Phoenix danced together in a statistical square dance.

But our journey did not end there. As we adventured through this statistical desert, we ensured that our methodology upheld the highest standards of rigor and reliability. Our analytical approach remained as steadfast as a saguaro cactus standing tall in the face of statistical uncertainty. We accounted for potential confounding variables, ensuring that our findings were as crisp and clear as the Arizona sky on a cloudless day.

So, with the rhythmic beat of statistical analysis and the winds of data collection at our backs, we proceeded to uncover the unexpected and captivating connection that leaves us pondering, "What in the fresh air is this all about?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamila and Air quality in Phoenix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7964503, r-squared of 0.6343330, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Jamila's Jam: A Breath of Fresh Air in Phoenix

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the remarkable correlation between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona. We took a lungful of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to delve into this curious connection. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503, leaving us breathless with excitement, and with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022. Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Jamila has soared, so has the perceived air quality in Phoenix, leaving us to ponder if there's something in a name that truly does bring a breath of fresh air. We hope this study tickles your funny bone and leaves you pondering the unexpected connections that exist in our world. Breathe easy, for the Jamila effect seems to be clear as air in Phoenix!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Welcome, dear reader, to a world of whimsy and wonder, where the air is clear, and the first names are correlated with air quality. Today, we embark on a scientific journey that may leave you scratching your head or simply saying, "What in the fresh air is this all about?" We are delving into the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona.
Now, you may be thinking, "What's in a name?" But hold your breath—pun intended—as we unravel the mysteries behind the Jamila phenomenon. From the dusty depths of Phoenix to the heights of statistical analysis, we seek to uncover whether there's truly a breath of fresh air associated with this charming moniker.
The rationale behind this study was not born out of thin air. Rather, it stems from the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7964503 that emerged when plumbing the depths of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency. Picture this: a cloud of data, swirling with statistical significance and airy implications, that left us breathless with excitement (and perhaps a touch of confusion).
As the curtains rise on our quirky investigation, we invite you to suspend disbelief and revel in the unexpected connections that weave through our everyday existence. Take a deep breath, for the Jamila effect beckons us to explore the whimsical juncture where human nomenclature meets atmospheric purity. So, buckle up and hold your breath (figuratively speaking, of course), for the Jamila's Jam promises to be an exhilarating journey into the realms of correlations and comedic curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis left us gasping for breath, not from poor air quality, but from the striking correlation we uncovered between the popularity of the name Jamila and air quality in Phoenix. Our statistical tests revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503, which, in layman's terms, means there's a pretty strong whiff of connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

Our r-squared value of 0.6343330 suggests that approximately 63.4% of the variability in air quality in Phoenix can be explained by variations in the popularity of the name Jamila. We couldn't help but marvel at this unexpected finding, which seemed to hang in the air like a pun waiting to be dispelled.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings were not just a breath of fresh air, but a gust of statistical significance that whispered, "Hey, there's something intriguing going on here!" It's as if the name Jamila has wafted through the Phoenix skies, leaving a trace of improved air quality in its wake.

Now, to visualize this mystical bond between the name Jamila and Phoenix air, we present Fig. 1. Feast your eyes on the scatterplot that showcases the undeniable correlation between these two variables, leaving us with no choice but to marvel at the unexpected connection that seems to hover over the Grand Canyon State like a dust cloud in the wind.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamila and Air quality in Phoenix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Jamila's Jam: A Breath of Fresh Air in Phoenix

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the remarkable correlation between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona. We took a lungful of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to delve into this curious connection. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503, leaving us breathless with excitement, and with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022. Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Jamila has soared, so has the perceived air quality in Phoenix, leaving us to ponder if there's something in a name that truly does bring a breath of fresh air. We hope this study tickles your funny bone and leaves you pondering the unexpected connections that exist in our world. Breathe easy, for the Jamila effect seems to be clear as air in Phoenix!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In a study conducted by Smith et al., the authors find a surprising link between the popularity of the first name Jamila and environmental factors in urban areas. While their study didn't directly investigate the air quality in Phoenix, their findings hinted at the potential for peculiar correlations between names and atmospheric conditions. Similarly, Doe's research on sociocultural influences on naming trends presents compelling evidence that the choice of a name can reflect and even impact broader societal shifts, including environmental attitudes.
Jones delves into the intriguing world of name meanings and their cultural significance. While Jones' work doesn't explicitly touch on air quality, it does tap into the notion that names hold a certain power over perception and behavior. Could it be that the mere presence of "Jamila" in the desert air of Phoenix brings forth a sense of freshness and purity? It's a tantalizing thought, to say the least.
Moving beyond the scholarly realm, let's turn our attention to non-fiction works that may offer insight into the Jamila phenomenon. "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Guide to Atmospheric Dynamics" by Lorem and Ipsum provides a comprehensive overview of the intricate dynamics that govern air quality. However, their work regrettably doesn't include a section on the impact of names on the composition of the atmosphere.
On a lighter note, fiction also has its role to play in shedding light on our curious inquiry. "The Name Effect" by Fictional Author and "Atmospheric Alchemy" by Imaginary Writer are two whimsical tales that weave together the mystical influence of names and the ethereal elements of the sky. While these books are products of literary imagination, they beckon us to ponder the playful possibilities of the Jamila-air quality correlation.
Turning to the realm of animated entertainment, the quintessential children's show "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" may seem a world away from our air quality study. Yet, amidst the colorful adventures and environmental messages, there's a subtle nod to the idea that individual actions can ripple into broader environmental impacts. Plus, who wouldn't want Captain Planet to swoop in and proclaim, "By your powers combined, I am Captain Clean Air!"?
Similarly, the classic cartoon "The Magic School Bus" takes young viewers on wacky educational escapades. While the show doesn't explicitly cover the link between names and air quality, it does instill in its audience a keen sense of curiosity about scientific phenomena. Perhaps Ms. Frizzle and her students could hop aboard the magical bus to explore the enigmatic connection between Jamila and air quality in Phoenix.
In sum, the literature offers a varied tapestry of insights and imagination, from scholarly musings to fanciful fables, that invites us to consider the unexpected wonders that may be at play in our study of the Jamila-air quality correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis left us gasping for breath, not from poor air quality, but from the striking correlation we uncovered between the popularity of the name Jamila and air quality in Phoenix. Our statistical tests revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503, which, in layman's terms, means there's a pretty strong whiff of connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Our r-squared value of 0.6343330 suggests that approximately 63.4% of the variability in air quality in Phoenix can be explained by variations in the popularity of the name Jamila. We couldn't help but marvel at this unexpected finding, which seemed to hang in the air like a pun waiting to be dispelled.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings were not just a breath of fresh air, but a gust of statistical significance that whispered, "Hey, there's something intriguing going on here!" It's as if the name Jamila has wafted through the Phoenix skies, leaving a trace of improved air quality in its wake.
Now, to visualize this mystical bond between the name Jamila and Phoenix air, we present Fig. 1. Feast your eyes on the scatterplot that showcases the undeniable correlation between these two variables, leaving us with no choice but to marvel at the unexpected connection that seems to hover over the Grand Canyon State like a dust cloud in the wind.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have blown away any skepticism about the potential link between the popularity of the first name Jamila and air quality in Phoenix, leaving us to marvel at the whimsical nature of this unexpected correlation. The statistical evidence may seem like a gust of wind carrying an amusing pun, but it robustly supports the notion that there's something in a name that can truly affect the air we breathe in the Valley of the Sun.

Drawing from the literary musings in our review section, we were tickled to find that our results echoed the intriguing hints from Smith et al.'s study, showcasing the remarkable potential for peculiar correlations between names and environmental factors. Additionally, Doe's research on sociocultural influences on naming trends resonated with our findings, indicating that the choice of a name can indeed influence broader societal shifts, including environmental attitudes. Who would have thought that a name like Jamila could carry so much weight in the desert air?

Our results bring into sharp focus the playful possibilities painted by the literature's varied tapestry. From scholarly musings to fanciful fables, the unexpected wonders explored in our study encourage us to view the world through a lens of whimsical curiosity. The quirky connections found in our analysis seem to resonate with Captain Planet's environmental messages and the inquisitive spirit of Ms. Frizzle from "The Magic School Bus," prompting us to consider the mystical influences that may waft through the Phoenix air.

As we reflect on the intriguing implications of our study, we invite our readers to bask in the playful possibility that there may be more to names than meets the eye – or the lung, for that matter. The Jamila phenomenon, it seems, is not just a breath of fresh air but a delightful reminder that unexpected connections can be found in even the most unlikely places. So, take a deep breath, and let the name Jamila weave its ethereal influence on your perception of the air you breathe. After all, in the grand tapestry of the world, perhaps there's a touch of magic in every breath we take.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jamila and Air quality in Phoenix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Jamila's Jam: A Breath of Fresh Air in Phoenix

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the remarkable correlation between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona. We took a lungful of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to delve into this curious connection. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503, leaving us breathless with excitement, and with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022. Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Jamila has soared, so has the perceived air quality in Phoenix, leaving us to ponder if there's something in a name that truly does bring a breath of fresh air. We hope this study tickles your funny bone and leaves you pondering the unexpected connections that exist in our world. Breathe easy, for the Jamila effect seems to be clear as air in Phoenix!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Welcome, dear reader, to a world of whimsy and wonder, where the air is clear, and the first names are correlated with air quality. Today, we embark on a scientific journey that may leave you scratching your head or simply saying, "What in the fresh air is this all about?" We are delving into the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona.
Now, you may be thinking, "What's in a name?" But hold your breath—pun intended—as we unravel the mysteries behind the Jamila phenomenon. From the dusty depths of Phoenix to the heights of statistical analysis, we seek to uncover whether there's truly a breath of fresh air associated with this charming moniker.
The rationale behind this study was not born out of thin air. Rather, it stems from the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7964503 that emerged when plumbing the depths of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency. Picture this: a cloud of data, swirling with statistical significance and airy implications, that left us breathless with excitement (and perhaps a touch of confusion).
As the curtains rise on our quirky investigation, we invite you to suspend disbelief and revel in the unexpected connections that weave through our everyday existence. Take a deep breath, for the Jamila effect beckons us to explore the whimsical juncture where human nomenclature meets atmospheric purity. So, buckle up and hold your breath (figuratively speaking, of course), for the Jamila's Jam promises to be an exhilarating journey into the realms of correlations and comedic curiosity.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis left us gasping for breath, not from poor air quality, but from the striking correlation we uncovered between the popularity of the name Jamila and air quality in Phoenix. Our statistical tests revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503, which, in layman's terms, means there's a pretty strong whiff of connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Our r-squared value of 0.6343330 suggests that approximately 63.4% of the variability in air quality in Phoenix can be explained by variations in the popularity of the name Jamila. We couldn't help but marvel at this unexpected finding, which seemed to hang in the air like a pun waiting to be dispelled.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings were not just a breath of fresh air, but a gust of statistical significance that whispered, "Hey, there's something intriguing going on here!" It's as if the name Jamila has wafted through the Phoenix skies, leaving a trace of improved air quality in its wake.
Now, to visualize this mystical bond between the name Jamila and Phoenix air, we present Fig. 1. Feast your eyes on the scatterplot that showcases the undeniable correlation between these two variables, leaving us with no choice but to marvel at the unexpected connection that seems to hover over the Grand Canyon State like a dust cloud in the wind.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has revealed a truly remarkable correlation between the popularity of the first name Jamila and air quality in Phoenix, Arizona. It seems that the ethereal essence of the name Jamila has permeated the very air of Phoenix, contributing to a breath of fresh air for its residents.

While some may wonder if this is just a statistical fluke, we must assure you that this phenomenon is no mere puff of smoke. Our findings suggest that there is indeed something enchanting about the name Jamila that brings about a palpable improvement in air quality, leaving us in awe of the unexpected connections that abound in our world.

As we wrap up this whimsical journey into the realms of correlations and comedic curiosity, we hope our study has tickled your funny bone and left you pondering the mysterious interplay between human nomenclature and atmospheric purity.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we invite you to take a deep breath and marvel at the Jamila effect—a phenomenon that seems to be as clear as the air in Phoenix! It seems that there's no need to hold our breath in anticipation of more research in this area. We've unraveled enough unexpected connections for now!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Jamila's Jam: A Breath of Fresh Air in Phoenix. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Eclecticism


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Jamila's Jam: A Breath of Fresh Air in Phoenix. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Air Quality Advancement and Culinary Innovation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Jamila's Jam: A Breath of Fresh Air in Phoenix with an abstract of In this study, we explore the remarkable correlation between the popularity of the first name Jamila and the air quality in Phoenix, Arizona. We took a lungful of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency to delve into this curious connection. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7964503, leaving us breathless with excitement, and with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 2022. Our findings suggest that as the popularity of the name Jamila has soared, so has the perceived air quality in Phoenix, leaving us to ponder if there's something in a name that truly does bring a breath of fresh air. We hope this study tickles your funny bone and leaves you pondering the unexpected connections that exist in our world. Breathe easy, for the Jamila effect seems to be clear as air in Phoenix!

ChatGPT:

Jamila, air quality, Phoenix, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, lungful of data, correlation coefficient, p-value, 1980-2022, perceived air quality, name popularity, unexpected connections, fresh air, Phoenix air quality

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Jamila
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Jamila
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Jamila

Air quality in Phoenix
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Phoenix

Correlation r = 0.7964503 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6343330 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air quality in Phoenix) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Jamila) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.7E-10. 0.0000000001695710968675924000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 1.7E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,897,231,418 random variables You don't actually need 5 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Jamila (Babies born)226195217173166143192191170213236226211238211192159117126118109971118295798297106727487769494106120111167144114132107
Air quality in Phoenix (Good air quality)25.068917.260325.753424.38369.5628411.506813.150718.181824.043724.383627.945226.575321.857927.671220.821914.246615.8478.493159.315071.369865.73778.219188.4931511.780816.393413.42473.01376.027411.74866.8493216.16445.479456.284158.219186.027413.97267.103838.7671211.506813.69863.005463.01379.31507




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([226,195,217,173,166,143,192,191,170,213,236,226,211,238,211,192,159,117,126,118,109,97,111,82,95,79,82,97,106,72,74,87,76,94,94,106,120,111,167,144,114,132,107,])
array_2 = np.array([25.0689,17.2603,25.7534,24.3836,9.56284,11.5068,13.1507,18.1818,24.0437,24.3836,27.9452,26.5753,21.8579,27.6712,20.8219,14.2466,15.847,8.49315,9.31507,1.36986,5.7377,8.21918,8.49315,11.7808,16.3934,13.4247,3.0137,6.0274,11.7486,6.84932,16.1644,5.47945,6.28415,8.21918,6.0274,13.9726,7.10383,8.76712,11.5068,13.6986,3.00546,3.0137,9.31507,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Jamila"
array_2_name = "Air quality in Phoenix"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1739 · Black Variable ID: 3961 · Red Variable ID: 21062
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0