about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,507 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Ticket prices at North American movie theaters and the second variable is Number of Lawyers in the United States.  The chart goes from 2001 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As ticket prices at North American movie theaters increased, more people decided to sneak in without paying. This led to a rise in the number of people caught and taken to court for movie piracy, thus creating a higher demand for lawyers in the United States.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image inspired by a vintage black-and-white newspaper illustration capturing the contrast between commerce and law in a bustling city. Picture a grand movie theater marquee adorned with the glitzy lettering "Now Playing," showcasing the steep ticket prices for the latest blockbuster film, drawing crowds of well-dressed moviegoers. Nearby, outside an imposing office building, a line of sharp-suited lawyers engage in intense discussions, exuding professionalism and gravitas. This scene embodies the stark realities of the entertainment industry, symbolizing the significant costs and legal complexities through a simple and evocative visual narrative. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Ticket prices at North American movie theaters and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image Realistic A black-and-white newspaper illustration Cyberpunk Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Ticket prices at North American movie theaters and Number of Lawyers in the United States together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city, a movie theater marquee proudly displays the ticket prices for the latest blockbuster, while nearby, a line of lawyers gather outside their office building, busy discussing legal matters. Both the high movie ticket prices and the numerous lawyers symbolize the significant costs and legal complexities that can be involved in the entertainment industry.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city, a movie theater marquee proudly displays the ticket prices for the latest blockbuster, while nearby, a line of lawyers gather outside their office building, busy discussing legal matters. Both the high movie ticket prices and the numerous lawyers symbolize the significant costs and legal complexities that can be involved in the entertainment industry. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image inspired by a vintage black-and-white newspaper illustration capturing the contrast between commerce and law in a bustling city. Picture a grand movie theater marquee adorned with the glitzy lettering "Now Playing," showcasing the steep ticket prices for the latest blockbuster film, drawing crowds of well-dressed moviegoers. Nearby, outside an imposing office building, a line of sharp-suited lawyers engage in intense discussions, exuding professionalism and gravitas. This scene embodies the stark realities of the entertainment industry, symbolizing the significant costs and legal complexities through a simple and evocative visual narrative.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Ticket prices at North American movie theaters caused Number of Lawyers in the United States to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Legal Flickonomics: The Juris-prudence of Movie Ticket Prices in North America

Journal of Cinematic Economics and Law

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Ticket prices at North American movie theaters and Number of Lawyers in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from The Numbers and ABA to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and p < 0.01 for 2001 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Legal Flickonomics: The Juris-prudence of Movie Ticket Prices in North America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the link between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The hypothesis underlying our research is that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices, reflecting a potential influence of legal market dynamics on the entertainment sector. Our research utilizes data from The Numbers and the American Bar Association (ABA) to scrutinize this novel connection. Believe it or not, we discovered a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2001 to 2022.

Like a good Hollywood plot twist, our findings suggest an intriguing relationship between the legal profession and the cost of cinematic amusement. Our results may prompt further examination of the economic forces at play, shedding light on the intricate web of influences shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. It seems that legal expertise might just have a hand in shaping the ticket prices for those blockbuster movies - talk about a case of "legally-priced entertainment"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Ticket prices at North American movie theaters and Number of Lawyers in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Legal Flickonomics: The Juris-prudence of Movie Ticket Prices in North America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the link between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The hypothesis underlying our research is that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices, reflecting a potential influence of legal market dynamics on the entertainment sector. Our research utilizes data from The Numbers and the American Bar Association (ABA) to scrutinize this novel connection. Believe it or not, we discovered a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2001 to 2022.

Like a good Hollywood plot twist, our findings suggest an intriguing relationship between the legal profession and the cost of cinematic amusement. Our results may prompt further examination of the economic forces at play, shedding light on the intricate web of influences shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. It seems that legal expertise might just have a hand in shaping the ticket prices for those blockbuster movies - talk about a case of "legally-priced entertainment"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Lights, camera, jurisprudence! The intersection of law and cinema, though unconventional, has fascinated both legal scholars and movie enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the surprising and legally luminous world of movie ticket prices in North American theaters and their correlation with the number of lawyers in the United States. Did you hear about the movie about illegal briefs? It was a real courtroom drama!

The hypothesis driving our investigation is founded on the notion that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices. This hypothesis stems from the underlying idea that legal market dynamics may exert a discernible influence on consumer pricing in the entertainment industry. It's almost like lawyers are billing by the reel these days!

We have harnessed extensive data from The Numbers, a leading provider of box office statistics, and the American Bar Association (ABA), the preeminent professional organization for attorneys in the United States. Our analytical approach involved scrutinizing these datasets to unravel the unexpected correlation between the legal landscape and the cost of cinematic escapades. It's like we're analyzing "legally blonde" evidence to crack this case wide open!

Our results unveiled a statistically significant correlation between movie ticket prices and the number of lawyers, characterized by a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2001 to 2022. These numbers certainly make a compelling case for the curious connection between jurisprudence and the realm of silver screen entertainment. This correlation may very well leave legal and economic analysts saying, "It's a legal blockbuster!"

In our exploration of this unexpected relationship, you could say we've stumbled upon a legal twist worthy of a John Grisham novel. Our findings not only underscore the uncanny bond between the legal profession and the cost of movie tickets but also offer a fresh perspective on the underlying economic forces at play. It's like the legal profession has a starring role in the drama of consumer pricing strategies!

Our research aims to illuminate the complex web of influences that shape consumer pricing dynamics within the movie industry. By shedding light on this unconventional connection, we hope to provoke further scholarly inquiry into the multi-faceted influences steering the economics of cinematic entertainment. Who knew legal expertise could impact the price you pay for that bucket of popcorn and extra-large soda at the movies? It's certainly a case of "legally-priced entertainment" turning heads!

As we unravel the peculiar bond between legal trends and ticket prices, our study paves the way for a deeper understanding of the underlying forces shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. After all, when it comes to the economics of cinema, it seems that the legal realm isn't just an "extra" but a key player in setting the scene for what you'll pay at the box office.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Ticket prices at North American movie theaters and Number of Lawyers in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Legal Flickonomics: The Juris-prudence of Movie Ticket Prices in North America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the link between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The hypothesis underlying our research is that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices, reflecting a potential influence of legal market dynamics on the entertainment sector. Our research utilizes data from The Numbers and the American Bar Association (ABA) to scrutinize this novel connection. Believe it or not, we discovered a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2001 to 2022.

Like a good Hollywood plot twist, our findings suggest an intriguing relationship between the legal profession and the cost of cinematic amusement. Our results may prompt further examination of the economic forces at play, shedding light on the intricate web of influences shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. It seems that legal expertise might just have a hand in shaping the ticket prices for those blockbuster movies - talk about a case of "legally-priced entertainment"!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Lights, camera, jurisprudence! The intersection of law and cinema, though unconventional, has fascinated both legal scholars and movie enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the surprising and legally luminous world of movie ticket prices in North American theaters and their correlation with the number of lawyers in the United States. Did you hear about the movie about illegal briefs? It was a real courtroom drama!
The hypothesis driving our investigation is founded on the notion that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices. This hypothesis stems from the underlying idea that legal market dynamics may exert a discernible influence on consumer pricing in the entertainment industry. It's almost like lawyers are billing by the reel these days!
We have harnessed extensive data from The Numbers, a leading provider of box office statistics, and the American Bar Association (ABA), the preeminent professional organization for attorneys in the United States. Our analytical approach involved scrutinizing these datasets to unravel the unexpected correlation between the legal landscape and the cost of cinematic escapades. It's like we're analyzing "legally blonde" evidence to crack this case wide open!
Our results unveiled a statistically significant correlation between movie ticket prices and the number of lawyers, characterized by a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2001 to 2022. These numbers certainly make a compelling case for the curious connection between jurisprudence and the realm of silver screen entertainment. This correlation may very well leave legal and economic analysts saying, "It's a legal blockbuster!"
In our exploration of this unexpected relationship, you could say we've stumbled upon a legal twist worthy of a John Grisham novel. Our findings not only underscore the uncanny bond between the legal profession and the cost of movie tickets but also offer a fresh perspective on the underlying economic forces at play. It's like the legal profession has a starring role in the drama of consumer pricing strategies!
Our research aims to illuminate the complex web of influences that shape consumer pricing dynamics within the movie industry. By shedding light on this unconventional connection, we hope to provoke further scholarly inquiry into the multi-faceted influences steering the economics of cinematic entertainment. Who knew legal expertise could impact the price you pay for that bucket of popcorn and extra-large soda at the movies? It's certainly a case of "legally-priced entertainment" turning heads!
As we unravel the peculiar bond between legal trends and ticket prices, our study paves the way for a deeper understanding of the underlying forces shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. After all, when it comes to the economics of cinema, it seems that the legal realm isn't just an "extra" but a key player in setting the scene for what you'll pay at the box office.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

An early study by Smith (2007) reveals the economic complexities of the movie industry, exploring factors such as production costs, marketing strategies, and consumer demand. Concurrently, Doe et al. (2013) investigate consumer behavior in the realm of entertainment, offering insights into the influence of external forces on pricing dynamics. However, none of these studies could have anticipated the legal twist we stumbled upon in our research - it's almost as unexpected as a "M. Night Shyamalan plot reveal"!

Moving beyond the traditional bounds of economic analysis, our investigation uncovers a correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the cost of movie tickets in North American theaters. While this connection might seem as improbable as a lawyer in an action movie, our findings present a compelling case for the influence of legal market dynamics on consumer pricing in the entertainment industry.

In "Legal Eagles and Box Office Fees", Brown and Green (2015) examine the intersection of law and entertainment, focusing on intellectual property rights and contractual negotiations. Their work sheds light on the legal intricacies underlying the production and distribution of films, but little did they know that their insights would inadvertently steer us towards the cinematic economics of lawyer-attendance ratios. It's almost as if our findings were written in the stars of Hollywood Boulevard!

Delving further into the world of legal economics, Jones and White (2018) emphasize the impact of regulatory frameworks on market structures and pricing strategies. While their analyses provide a comprehensive overview of legal influences on economic dynamics, our research unveils an unexpected extension of this relationship, bringing forth the tangled web of connections between the legal profession and the cost of movie entertainment. It's like we're solving a "whodunit" with popcorn and a legal pad!

As we consider the cultural impact of legal-themed literature, works such as "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "The Firm" offer fictional narratives that intertwine law and storytelling. While these novels may not directly address economic implications, their portrayal of legal themes in the context of dramatic storytelling prompts us to ponder the indelible mark of legal culture on societal dynamics - so much so that even movie ticket prices might just find themselves under its spell.

Bringing a different dimension to our scholarly discourse, games like "Lawyer Up" and "Witness" draw on legal narratives, inviting players to immerse themselves in the complexities of courtroom battles and legal negotiations. Though these board games may seem like a departure from conventional research subjects, they underscore the pervasive influence of legal themes in popular culture, extending even to the realms of leisure and entertainment. It's almost as if the gavel is tapping out a rhythm to the price fluctuations at the box office!

In layman's terms, our findings extend beyond the traditional boundaries of economic analysis, shedding light on the unexpected ties between the legal profession and the cost of cinematic adventures. It seems that the legal landscape may very well have a hand in shaping the price you pay for that blockbuster movie ticket - who would've thought that the number of lawyers in the United States could hold such sway over your movie night out? It's like the legal profession has assumed the role of a "supporting actor" in the grand theater of consumer pricing dynamics!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Ticket prices at North American movie theaters and Number of Lawyers in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Numbers and ABA . You used data from 2001 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Legal Flickonomics: The Juris-prudence of Movie Ticket Prices in North America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the link between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The hypothesis underlying our research is that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices, reflecting a potential influence of legal market dynamics on the entertainment sector. Our research utilizes data from The Numbers and the American Bar Association (ABA) to scrutinize this novel connection. Believe it or not, we discovered a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2001 to 2022.

Like a good Hollywood plot twist, our findings suggest an intriguing relationship between the legal profession and the cost of cinematic amusement. Our results may prompt further examination of the economic forces at play, shedding light on the intricate web of influences shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. It seems that legal expertise might just have a hand in shaping the ticket prices for those blockbuster movies - talk about a case of "legally-priced entertainment"!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Lights, camera, jurisprudence! The intersection of law and cinema, though unconventional, has fascinated both legal scholars and movie enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the surprising and legally luminous world of movie ticket prices in North American theaters and their correlation with the number of lawyers in the United States. Did you hear about the movie about illegal briefs? It was a real courtroom drama!
The hypothesis driving our investigation is founded on the notion that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices. This hypothesis stems from the underlying idea that legal market dynamics may exert a discernible influence on consumer pricing in the entertainment industry. It's almost like lawyers are billing by the reel these days!
We have harnessed extensive data from The Numbers, a leading provider of box office statistics, and the American Bar Association (ABA), the preeminent professional organization for attorneys in the United States. Our analytical approach involved scrutinizing these datasets to unravel the unexpected correlation between the legal landscape and the cost of cinematic escapades. It's like we're analyzing "legally blonde" evidence to crack this case wide open!
Our results unveiled a statistically significant correlation between movie ticket prices and the number of lawyers, characterized by a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2001 to 2022. These numbers certainly make a compelling case for the curious connection between jurisprudence and the realm of silver screen entertainment. This correlation may very well leave legal and economic analysts saying, "It's a legal blockbuster!"
In our exploration of this unexpected relationship, you could say we've stumbled upon a legal twist worthy of a John Grisham novel. Our findings not only underscore the uncanny bond between the legal profession and the cost of movie tickets but also offer a fresh perspective on the underlying economic forces at play. It's like the legal profession has a starring role in the drama of consumer pricing strategies!
Our research aims to illuminate the complex web of influences that shape consumer pricing dynamics within the movie industry. By shedding light on this unconventional connection, we hope to provoke further scholarly inquiry into the multi-faceted influences steering the economics of cinematic entertainment. Who knew legal expertise could impact the price you pay for that bucket of popcorn and extra-large soda at the movies? It's certainly a case of "legally-priced entertainment" turning heads!
As we unravel the peculiar bond between legal trends and ticket prices, our study paves the way for a deeper understanding of the underlying forces shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. After all, when it comes to the economics of cinema, it seems that the legal realm isn't just an "extra" but a key player in setting the scene for what you'll pay at the box office.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the curious correlation between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States, our research team embraced an analytical approach that was as meticulously crafted as a legal argument and as dynamic as a summer blockbuster. Let's just say we used statistical methods that would make even the most adept legal eagle nod in approval!

First and foremost, we collected data from The Numbers, covering box office statistics with the thoroughness of an evidence-gathering process in a high-profile case. We also harnessed information from the American Bar Association (ABA), delving into lawyer demographics and legal market trends with the inquisitiveness of a detective seeking clues in a compelling mystery. It's almost like we had the entire legal profession cast in the role of statistical data sleuths!

Next, we employed a time-series analysis to explore the fluctuations in movie ticket prices and the number of lawyers over the period from 2001 to 2022. This method allowed us to uncover patterns and dynamics in these seemingly disparate variables, as if we were unraveling the intricacies of a legal maneuver in a courtroom drama. To further refine our analysis, we employed regression models to tease out the potential influence of the number of lawyers on movie ticket prices, akin to building a persuasive legal argument based on empirical evidence.

Our data cleansing process was as meticulous as a legal brief, ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the datasets sourced from The Numbers and ABA. We removed outliers with the precision of a judge striking down inadmissible evidence, streamlining the datasets for a more robust analysis. Through this process, we sifted through the data with the focus of a lawyer searching for precedent in case law, ensuring that our findings were based on the most sound and reliable information available.

Like uncovering a hidden legal clause in a contract, we employed advanced statistical techniques such as multivariate analysis to account for potential confounding variables that could sway our results. By controlling for factors such as inflation rates, economic indicators, and movie industry trends, we aimed to isolate the unique impact of the number of lawyers on movie ticket prices. It's safe to say we left no statistical stone unturned in our quest to reveal the intriguing relationship between legal dynamics and the cost of cinematic indulgence.

In summary, our research methodology combined the tenacity of legal inquiry with the precision of statistical analysis, culminating in an exploration of the unorthodox interplay between the legal landscape and consumer pricing in the movie industry. It's almost as if we took a legal oath to uncover the truth behind the surprising correlation between jurisprudence and the silver screen!

Why don't lawyers ever go to the beach? Cats keep trying to bury them!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Ticket prices at North American movie theaters and Number of Lawyers in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Numbers and ABA .

For the time period 2001 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9468580, r-squared of 0.8965400, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Legal Flickonomics: The Juris-prudence of Movie Ticket Prices in North America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the link between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The hypothesis underlying our research is that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices, reflecting a potential influence of legal market dynamics on the entertainment sector. Our research utilizes data from The Numbers and the American Bar Association (ABA) to scrutinize this novel connection. Believe it or not, we discovered a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2001 to 2022.

Like a good Hollywood plot twist, our findings suggest an intriguing relationship between the legal profession and the cost of cinematic amusement. Our results may prompt further examination of the economic forces at play, shedding light on the intricate web of influences shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. It seems that legal expertise might just have a hand in shaping the ticket prices for those blockbuster movies - talk about a case of "legally-priced entertainment"!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Lights, camera, jurisprudence! The intersection of law and cinema, though unconventional, has fascinated both legal scholars and movie enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the surprising and legally luminous world of movie ticket prices in North American theaters and their correlation with the number of lawyers in the United States. Did you hear about the movie about illegal briefs? It was a real courtroom drama!
The hypothesis driving our investigation is founded on the notion that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices. This hypothesis stems from the underlying idea that legal market dynamics may exert a discernible influence on consumer pricing in the entertainment industry. It's almost like lawyers are billing by the reel these days!
We have harnessed extensive data from The Numbers, a leading provider of box office statistics, and the American Bar Association (ABA), the preeminent professional organization for attorneys in the United States. Our analytical approach involved scrutinizing these datasets to unravel the unexpected correlation between the legal landscape and the cost of cinematic escapades. It's like we're analyzing "legally blonde" evidence to crack this case wide open!
Our results unveiled a statistically significant correlation between movie ticket prices and the number of lawyers, characterized by a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2001 to 2022. These numbers certainly make a compelling case for the curious connection between jurisprudence and the realm of silver screen entertainment. This correlation may very well leave legal and economic analysts saying, "It's a legal blockbuster!"
In our exploration of this unexpected relationship, you could say we've stumbled upon a legal twist worthy of a John Grisham novel. Our findings not only underscore the uncanny bond between the legal profession and the cost of movie tickets but also offer a fresh perspective on the underlying economic forces at play. It's like the legal profession has a starring role in the drama of consumer pricing strategies!
Our research aims to illuminate the complex web of influences that shape consumer pricing dynamics within the movie industry. By shedding light on this unconventional connection, we hope to provoke further scholarly inquiry into the multi-faceted influences steering the economics of cinematic entertainment. Who knew legal expertise could impact the price you pay for that bucket of popcorn and extra-large soda at the movies? It's certainly a case of "legally-priced entertainment" turning heads!
As we unravel the peculiar bond between legal trends and ticket prices, our study paves the way for a deeper understanding of the underlying forces shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. After all, when it comes to the economics of cinema, it seems that the legal realm isn't just an "extra" but a key player in setting the scene for what you'll pay at the box office.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 indicates a robust positive association between the two variables. It's like these movie ticket prices and lawyer numbers passed the bar exam with flying colors!

The coefficient of determination (R-squared) of 0.8965400 suggests that approximately 89.65% of the variation in movie ticket prices can be explained by the number of lawyers. In other words, legal professionals seem to have a significant influence on the dynamics of ticket pricing in the movie industry. I guess you could say lawyers are taking their "legal fees" to the box office!

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. It seems the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables is no joke, unlike the lawyer who only tells "objectionable" jokes in court!

Without further ado, Figure 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The scatterplot showcases a clear trend, suggesting that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices. It's like a Hollywood romance between the legal and entertainment worlds!

Overall, our findings underscore the unexpected linkage between the legal profession and consumer pricing in the movie industry. This correlation prompts a re-evaluation of the economic and legal dynamics at play, painting a picture of a truly "legally-priced" cinematic experience.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Ticket prices at North American movie theaters and Number of Lawyers in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Legal Flickonomics: The Juris-prudence of Movie Ticket Prices in North America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the link between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The hypothesis underlying our research is that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices, reflecting a potential influence of legal market dynamics on the entertainment sector. Our research utilizes data from The Numbers and the American Bar Association (ABA) to scrutinize this novel connection. Believe it or not, we discovered a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2001 to 2022.

Like a good Hollywood plot twist, our findings suggest an intriguing relationship between the legal profession and the cost of cinematic amusement. Our results may prompt further examination of the economic forces at play, shedding light on the intricate web of influences shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. It seems that legal expertise might just have a hand in shaping the ticket prices for those blockbuster movies - talk about a case of "legally-priced entertainment"!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
An early study by Smith (2007) reveals the economic complexities of the movie industry, exploring factors such as production costs, marketing strategies, and consumer demand. Concurrently, Doe et al. (2013) investigate consumer behavior in the realm of entertainment, offering insights into the influence of external forces on pricing dynamics. However, none of these studies could have anticipated the legal twist we stumbled upon in our research - it's almost as unexpected as a "M. Night Shyamalan plot reveal"!
Moving beyond the traditional bounds of economic analysis, our investigation uncovers a correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the cost of movie tickets in North American theaters. While this connection might seem as improbable as a lawyer in an action movie, our findings present a compelling case for the influence of legal market dynamics on consumer pricing in the entertainment industry.
In "Legal Eagles and Box Office Fees", Brown and Green (2015) examine the intersection of law and entertainment, focusing on intellectual property rights and contractual negotiations. Their work sheds light on the legal intricacies underlying the production and distribution of films, but little did they know that their insights would inadvertently steer us towards the cinematic economics of lawyer-attendance ratios. It's almost as if our findings were written in the stars of Hollywood Boulevard!
Delving further into the world of legal economics, Jones and White (2018) emphasize the impact of regulatory frameworks on market structures and pricing strategies. While their analyses provide a comprehensive overview of legal influences on economic dynamics, our research unveils an unexpected extension of this relationship, bringing forth the tangled web of connections between the legal profession and the cost of movie entertainment. It's like we're solving a "whodunit" with popcorn and a legal pad!
As we consider the cultural impact of legal-themed literature, works such as "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "The Firm" offer fictional narratives that intertwine law and storytelling. While these novels may not directly address economic implications, their portrayal of legal themes in the context of dramatic storytelling prompts us to ponder the indelible mark of legal culture on societal dynamics - so much so that even movie ticket prices might just find themselves under its spell.
Bringing a different dimension to our scholarly discourse, games like "Lawyer Up" and "Witness" draw on legal narratives, inviting players to immerse themselves in the complexities of courtroom battles and legal negotiations. Though these board games may seem like a departure from conventional research subjects, they underscore the pervasive influence of legal themes in popular culture, extending even to the realms of leisure and entertainment. It's almost as if the gavel is tapping out a rhythm to the price fluctuations at the box office!
In layman's terms, our findings extend beyond the traditional boundaries of economic analysis, shedding light on the unexpected ties between the legal profession and the cost of cinematic adventures. It seems that the legal landscape may very well have a hand in shaping the price you pay for that blockbuster movie ticket - who would've thought that the number of lawyers in the United States could hold such sway over your movie night out? It's like the legal profession has assumed the role of a "supporting actor" in the grand theater of consumer pricing dynamics!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 indicates a robust positive association between the two variables. It's like these movie ticket prices and lawyer numbers passed the bar exam with flying colors!
The coefficient of determination (R-squared) of 0.8965400 suggests that approximately 89.65% of the variation in movie ticket prices can be explained by the number of lawyers. In other words, legal professionals seem to have a significant influence on the dynamics of ticket pricing in the movie industry. I guess you could say lawyers are taking their "legal fees" to the box office!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. It seems the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables is no joke, unlike the lawyer who only tells "objectionable" jokes in court!
Without further ado, Figure 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The scatterplot showcases a clear trend, suggesting that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices. It's like a Hollywood romance between the legal and entertainment worlds!
Overall, our findings underscore the unexpected linkage between the legal profession and consumer pricing in the movie industry. This correlation prompts a re-evaluation of the economic and legal dynamics at play, painting a picture of a truly "legally-priced" cinematic experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results have provided empirical support for the unorthodox relationship between the number of lawyers in the United States and movie ticket prices in North American theaters. The robust positive correlation we uncovered lends credence to the hypothesis that legal market dynamics exert a discernible influence on consumer pricing in the entertainment industry. It seems that the legal profession may indeed be taking center stage in the economic drama of cinematic amusement, like a lawyer making a surprise cameo in a rom-com!

Our findings align with prior research that has probed into the abstruse connections between seemingly disparate domains, remarkably resembling the plot twists in a legal thriller. Early studies by Smith (2007) and Doe et al. (2013) set the stage for understanding economic dynamics in the movie industry, but our research presents an unexpected sequel, revealing the legal undercurrents shaping consumer pricing. It's almost as if our results were unfolding in a courtroom drama, with the evidence pointing to a conclusive verdict on the impact of lawyer numbers on ticket prices.

Moreover, the work of Brown and Green (2015) and Jones and White (2018) on legal influences in entertainment economics has laid the foundation for our exploration of this unconventional relationship, akin to a legal prelude to the movie's climactic revelation. It's as if we've cracked open a legal brief and found a script for understanding the price fluctuations at the box office!

As predicted, our statistical analysis substantiates the existence of a significant correlation between legal professionals and movie ticket prices, reinforcing the argument that legal market dynamics are interwoven with consumer pricing in the entertainment domain. It's as if the legal profession had established a "reel" connection with the economic forces at play - a twist that even the most astute movie critic wouldn't have foreseen!

In conclusion, our findings contribute an unexpected dimension to the economic analysis of the entertainment industry, underlining the previously unexplored influence of the legal profession on the cost of cinematic amusement. This curious correlation unearths the intricate ties between legal market dynamics and consumer pricing, inviting further exploration into the untold stories of influence and intrigue that shape the world of movie economics. It's like we've stumbled upon the "case of the costly tickets," with the legal profession playing an unforeseen role in the enigmatic narrative of movie pricing dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Ticket prices at North American movie theaters and Number of Lawyers in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Legal Flickonomics: The Juris-prudence of Movie Ticket Prices in North America

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the link between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The hypothesis underlying our research is that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices, reflecting a potential influence of legal market dynamics on the entertainment sector. Our research utilizes data from The Numbers and the American Bar Association (ABA) to scrutinize this novel connection. Believe it or not, we discovered a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2001 to 2022.

Like a good Hollywood plot twist, our findings suggest an intriguing relationship between the legal profession and the cost of cinematic amusement. Our results may prompt further examination of the economic forces at play, shedding light on the intricate web of influences shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. It seems that legal expertise might just have a hand in shaping the ticket prices for those blockbuster movies - talk about a case of "legally-priced entertainment"!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Lights, camera, jurisprudence! The intersection of law and cinema, though unconventional, has fascinated both legal scholars and movie enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the surprising and legally luminous world of movie ticket prices in North American theaters and their correlation with the number of lawyers in the United States. Did you hear about the movie about illegal briefs? It was a real courtroom drama!
The hypothesis driving our investigation is founded on the notion that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices. This hypothesis stems from the underlying idea that legal market dynamics may exert a discernible influence on consumer pricing in the entertainment industry. It's almost like lawyers are billing by the reel these days!
We have harnessed extensive data from The Numbers, a leading provider of box office statistics, and the American Bar Association (ABA), the preeminent professional organization for attorneys in the United States. Our analytical approach involved scrutinizing these datasets to unravel the unexpected correlation between the legal landscape and the cost of cinematic escapades. It's like we're analyzing "legally blonde" evidence to crack this case wide open!
Our results unveiled a statistically significant correlation between movie ticket prices and the number of lawyers, characterized by a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2001 to 2022. These numbers certainly make a compelling case for the curious connection between jurisprudence and the realm of silver screen entertainment. This correlation may very well leave legal and economic analysts saying, "It's a legal blockbuster!"
In our exploration of this unexpected relationship, you could say we've stumbled upon a legal twist worthy of a John Grisham novel. Our findings not only underscore the uncanny bond between the legal profession and the cost of movie tickets but also offer a fresh perspective on the underlying economic forces at play. It's like the legal profession has a starring role in the drama of consumer pricing strategies!
Our research aims to illuminate the complex web of influences that shape consumer pricing dynamics within the movie industry. By shedding light on this unconventional connection, we hope to provoke further scholarly inquiry into the multi-faceted influences steering the economics of cinematic entertainment. Who knew legal expertise could impact the price you pay for that bucket of popcorn and extra-large soda at the movies? It's certainly a case of "legally-priced entertainment" turning heads!
As we unravel the peculiar bond between legal trends and ticket prices, our study paves the way for a deeper understanding of the underlying forces shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. After all, when it comes to the economics of cinema, it seems that the legal realm isn't just an "extra" but a key player in setting the scene for what you'll pay at the box office.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 indicates a robust positive association between the two variables. It's like these movie ticket prices and lawyer numbers passed the bar exam with flying colors!
The coefficient of determination (R-squared) of 0.8965400 suggests that approximately 89.65% of the variation in movie ticket prices can be explained by the number of lawyers. In other words, legal professionals seem to have a significant influence on the dynamics of ticket pricing in the movie industry. I guess you could say lawyers are taking their "legal fees" to the box office!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. It seems the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables is no joke, unlike the lawyer who only tells "objectionable" jokes in court!
Without further ado, Figure 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The scatterplot showcases a clear trend, suggesting that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices. It's like a Hollywood romance between the legal and entertainment worlds!
Overall, our findings underscore the unexpected linkage between the legal profession and consumer pricing in the movie industry. This correlation prompts a re-evaluation of the economic and legal dynamics at play, painting a picture of a truly "legally-priced" cinematic experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncovered an astonishing correlation between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The robust positive association with a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 suggests that legal professionals might hold more sway over the price of your movie night than we ever imagined. It's like lawyers have traded in their suits for director's chairs, shaping the cost of our cinematic adventures!

Our findings open the doors to a realm of unforeseen economic and legal interactions, turning the spotlight on the influence of legal market dynamics on consumer pricing within the entertainment industry. It appears legal expertise isn't just for courtroom dramas but also for setting ticket prices at the box office. In other words, lawyers are not just defending their clients; they're also defending the escalating cost of your movie date!

As for future research, it seems we've reached the pinnacle. There's no need for further investigation into this peculiar connection; we've reached the apex of "legal flickonomics." The case is closed, the gavel has fallen, and the verdict is in – the attorney influence on movie ticket prices is no longer a mystery. It's time to close this chapter and let these findings take their rightful place in the annals of quirky economic curiosities. After all, when it comes to legal flickonomics, our research has truly set the scene for a grand finale!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Legal Flickonomics: The Juris-prudence of Movie Ticket Prices in North America. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Cinematic Economics and Law


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Legal Flickonomics: The Juris-prudence of Movie Ticket Prices in North America. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Cinematic Economics and Law


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Legal Flickonomics: The Juris-prudence of Movie Ticket Prices in North America with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the link between movie ticket prices in North American theaters and the number of lawyers in the United States. The hypothesis underlying our research is that as the number of lawyers increases, so do movie ticket prices, reflecting a potential influence of legal market dynamics on the entertainment sector. Our research utilizes data from The Numbers and the American Bar Association (ABA) to scrutinize this novel connection. Believe it or not, we discovered a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9468580 and a remarkably low p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2001 to 2022.
Like a good Hollywood plot twist, our findings suggest an intriguing relationship between the legal profession and the cost of cinematic amusement. Our results may prompt further examination of the economic forces at play, shedding light on the intricate web of influences shaping consumer pricing in the movie industry. It seems that legal expertise might just have a hand in shaping the ticket prices for those blockbuster movies - talk about a case of "legally-priced entertainment"!

ChatGPT:

movie ticket prices, North American theaters, lawyers in the United States, legal market dynamics, entertainment sector, The Numbers, American Bar Association, correlation between lawyers and movie ticket prices, consumer pricing in the movie industry

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Ticket prices at North American movie theaters
Detailed data title: Average ticket price at North American movie theaters
Source: The Numbers
See what else correlates with Ticket prices at North American movie theaters

Number of Lawyers in the United States
Detailed data title: The Count of ABA Lawyers in the United States
Source: ABA
See what else correlates with Number of Lawyers in the United States

Correlation r = 0.9468580 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8965400 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of Lawyers in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Ticket prices at North American movie theaters) over the 22 years from 2001 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.6E-11. 0.0000000000260126968876855100
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 2.6E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 38,442,765,251 random variables You don't actually need 38 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Ticket prices at North American movie theaters (Price in dollars)5.665.816.036.216.416.556.887.187.57.897.937.968.138.178.438.658.979.119.169.4110.410.53
Number of Lawyers in the United States (Lawyers)1048900104975010586601084500110477011169701143360116212011803901203100122545012452001268010128143013007001312870133596013423801352080132874013279101327010




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.66,5.81,6.03,6.21,6.41,6.55,6.88,7.18,7.5,7.89,7.93,7.96,8.13,8.17,8.43,8.65,8.97,9.11,9.16,9.41,10.4,10.53,])
array_2 = np.array([1048900,1049750,1058660,1084500,1104770,1116970,1143360,1162120,1180390,1203100,1225450,1245200,1268010,1281430,1300700,1312870,1335960,1342380,1352080,1328740,1327910,1327010,])
array_1_name = "Ticket prices at North American movie theaters"
array_2_name = "Number of Lawyers in the United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1507 · Black Variable ID: 41 · Red Variable ID: 542
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0