about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,438 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Ruth and the second variable is Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums.  The chart goes from 1993 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Ruth gained traction, more and more people were drawn to the classic and timeless feel of vinyl albums, much like Ruth Bader Ginsburg's approach to law. It seems Ruth wasn't just a-ruth-lessly popular, but also had a knack for spinning the tunes of nostalgia in people's hearts, leading to a real record high in demand for LPs. Why, it's a-rythm and blues tale of influence if there ever was one!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Realistic ] Generate an image of a cozy record store with warm lighting, showing a prominently displayed vintage LP album of Ruth Etting's greatest hits in the front window. Passersby can be seen stopping to admire the album cover, drawn in by the classic elegance of Ruth and the allure of vinyl nostalgia. Inside the store, customers are excitedly flipping through racks of LPs, with Ruth's album occasionally being plucked from the shelves by both seasoned collectors and younger music enthusiasts. The atmosphere should capture the timeless charm and warmth of browsing through classic records in a nostalgic setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Ruth and Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Cute cartoon Sci-fi fantacy Realistic Parallax art
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Ruth and Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy record store, a vintage LP album of Ruth Etting's greatest hits is prominently displayed in the front window. Passersby stop to admire the album cover, drawn in by the classic elegance of the timeless Ruth and the allure of vinyl nostalgia. Inside, the store buzzes with activity as customers excitedly flip through racks of LPs, with Ruth's album occasionally being plucked from the shelves by both seasoned collectors and younger music enthusiasts.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy record store, a vintage LP album of Ruth Etting's greatest hits is prominently displayed in the front window. Passersby stop to admire the album cover, drawn in by the classic elegance of the timeless Ruth and the allure of vinyl nostalgia. Inside, the store buzzes with activity as customers excitedly flip through racks of LPs, with Ruth's album occasionally being plucked from the shelves by both seasoned collectors and younger music enthusiasts. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Realistic ] Generate an image of a cozy record store with warm lighting, showing a prominently displayed vintage LP album of Ruth Etting's greatest hits in the front window. Passersby can be seen stopping to admire the album cover, drawn in by the classic elegance of Ruth and the allure of vinyl nostalgia. Inside the store, customers are excitedly flipping through racks of LPs, with Ruth's album occasionally being plucked from the shelves by both seasoned collectors and younger music enthusiasts. The atmosphere should capture the timeless charm and warmth of browsing through classic records in a nostalgic setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Ruth caused Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
For the Record: Ruth to Tune Ratio – A Groovy Link Between the Popularity of the Name Ruth and Vinyl Album Sales

The Journal of Retrosonic Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ruth and Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 and p < 0.01 for 1993 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
For the Record: Ruth to Tune Ratio – A Groovy Link Between the Popularity of the Name Ruth and Vinyl Album Sales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper dances through the groovy world of statistical analysis to explore the far-out connection between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, our research team unearthed an eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022. The results suggest that as the popularity of the name "Ruth" rises, so does the sale of groovy vinyl records. Whether it's purely happenstance or a cosmic conspiracy, this study sheds light on a correlation that is, undeniably, far out!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ruth and Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
For the Record: Ruth to Tune Ratio – A Groovy Link Between the Popularity of the Name Ruth and Vinyl Album Sales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper dances through the groovy world of statistical analysis to explore the far-out connection between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, our research team unearthed an eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022. The results suggest that as the popularity of the name "Ruth" rises, so does the sale of groovy vinyl records. Whether it's purely happenstance or a cosmic conspiracy, this study sheds light on a correlation that is, undeniably, far out!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of human naming trends and consumer behavior has always been a subject of curious fascination. In this paper, we embark on a groovy journey to explore the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Our study is fueled by an insatiable curiosity to uncover the enigmatic connections that permeate the cultural fabric, and to delve deeper into the underlying forces that may influence or reflect such conundrums.

While the era of LPs and vinyl records may evoke sentiments of nostalgia for some, the resurgence of interest in these musical relics has been nothing short of a vinyl renaissance. As music aficionados and data enthusiasts alike revel in the melodic crackles and pops of analog sound, our research aims to decipher the rhythmic patterns that sync the rise and fall of vinyl album sales with the ebb and flow of a seemingly unrelated phenomenon – the popularity of the name "Ruth."

At first blush, one might find it perplexing to conceive of any plausible connection between the venerable name "Ruth" and the pulsating sales of vinyl albums. However, as the late-blooming resurgence of vinyl has serenaded its way back into the mainstream, it beckons us to suspend disbelief and embrace the possibility of improbable correlations in the ethereal realm of consumer preferences and cultural influences.

Our statistical journey commences with an exploration of the data obtained from the US Social Security Administration, which chronicles the frequency of the name "Ruth" over the past few decades. Simultaneously, we harmonize these findings with the whirlwind of sales data from Statista, encapsulating the melodious sales statistics of LP/vinyl albums over the same time period. In this symphonic fusion of statistical analyses, we strive to uncover a harmony that sings the tale of a tuneful relationship between nomenclature and music consumption.

As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we remain mindful of the inherent skepticism that may accompany such unconventional inquiries. Nevertheless, our research has resolutely emerged with an astounding correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022, revealing a crescendo of synchronicity between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the boom of vinyl album sales. These findings not only raise eyebrows but also challenge the boundaries of conventional statistical paradigms, beckoning us to tap our toes to the unexpected beat of our results.

In the groovy pages that follow, we will dissect and analyze our findings, contemplating the implications of this unforeseen correlation and inviting readers to sway to the buoyant rhythm of our statistical revelations. As we embark on this captivating journey, we assure the discerning reader that our exploration is not merely an exercise in statistics but a celebration of the serendipitous symphony that thrums through the interconnectedness of human preferences and cultural phenomenon.

So, brace yourself, dear reader, as we unravel the enigmatic nexus between the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums, and beckon the mystique of statistical analysis to amplify the chorus of this unexpected correlation. Let the groovy quest begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ruth and Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
For the Record: Ruth to Tune Ratio – A Groovy Link Between the Popularity of the Name Ruth and Vinyl Album Sales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper dances through the groovy world of statistical analysis to explore the far-out connection between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, our research team unearthed an eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022. The results suggest that as the popularity of the name "Ruth" rises, so does the sale of groovy vinyl records. Whether it's purely happenstance or a cosmic conspiracy, this study sheds light on a correlation that is, undeniably, far out!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of human naming trends and consumer behavior has always been a subject of curious fascination. In this paper, we embark on a groovy journey to explore the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Our study is fueled by an insatiable curiosity to uncover the enigmatic connections that permeate the cultural fabric, and to delve deeper into the underlying forces that may influence or reflect such conundrums.
While the era of LPs and vinyl records may evoke sentiments of nostalgia for some, the resurgence of interest in these musical relics has been nothing short of a vinyl renaissance. As music aficionados and data enthusiasts alike revel in the melodic crackles and pops of analog sound, our research aims to decipher the rhythmic patterns that sync the rise and fall of vinyl album sales with the ebb and flow of a seemingly unrelated phenomenon – the popularity of the name "Ruth."
At first blush, one might find it perplexing to conceive of any plausible connection between the venerable name "Ruth" and the pulsating sales of vinyl albums. However, as the late-blooming resurgence of vinyl has serenaded its way back into the mainstream, it beckons us to suspend disbelief and embrace the possibility of improbable correlations in the ethereal realm of consumer preferences and cultural influences.
Our statistical journey commences with an exploration of the data obtained from the US Social Security Administration, which chronicles the frequency of the name "Ruth" over the past few decades. Simultaneously, we harmonize these findings with the whirlwind of sales data from Statista, encapsulating the melodious sales statistics of LP/vinyl albums over the same time period. In this symphonic fusion of statistical analyses, we strive to uncover a harmony that sings the tale of a tuneful relationship between nomenclature and music consumption.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we remain mindful of the inherent skepticism that may accompany such unconventional inquiries. Nevertheless, our research has resolutely emerged with an astounding correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022, revealing a crescendo of synchronicity between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the boom of vinyl album sales. These findings not only raise eyebrows but also challenge the boundaries of conventional statistical paradigms, beckoning us to tap our toes to the unexpected beat of our results.
In the groovy pages that follow, we will dissect and analyze our findings, contemplating the implications of this unforeseen correlation and inviting readers to sway to the buoyant rhythm of our statistical revelations. As we embark on this captivating journey, we assure the discerning reader that our exploration is not merely an exercise in statistics but a celebration of the serendipitous symphony that thrums through the interconnectedness of human preferences and cultural phenomenon.
So, brace yourself, dear reader, as we unravel the enigmatic nexus between the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums, and beckon the mystique of statistical analysis to amplify the chorus of this unexpected correlation. Let the groovy quest begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several studies have attempted to uncover the mysterious entanglement between nomenclature and consumer behavior. Smith et al. (2010) probed into the intriguing relationship between popular names and music sales, laying the groundwork for future investigations. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) delved deep into the enigmatic pathways that intertwine human naming trends with cultural preferences, hinting at the intersection of statistics and serendipitous synchronicities.

Turning to the music world, "The Vinyl Frontier" by Jonathan Scott (2016) and "Waxing Lyrical: LPs in a Digital World" by Alice Thompson (2018) offer insights into the resurgence of vinyl records in the modern era. While their focus lies in the marketplace dynamics and emotional resonance with analog music, it is evident that the allure of vinyl transcends mere nostalgia, hinting at a deeper, harmonious connection between the groovy tunes pressed onto these analog discs and the melodies encapsulated in a name.

On the fiction front, "High Fidelity" by Nick Hornby (1995) and "Eleanor & Park" by Rainbow Rowell (2013) offer fictional narratives that tangentially touch upon the inherent charm of vinyl records. Through their vibrant storytelling, these novels capture the emotive bonds that enthusiasts form with vinyl, teasing at the possibility of interdimensional resonance between the allure of a name and the rhythmic pulse of vinyl albums.

At the nexus of internet subculture and music, memes such as "Man Listening to Record" and "Bongo Cat" perpetuate a playful celebration of analog music formats. It is through these digital hilarities that the enduring charm of vinyl is perpetuated, luring curious minds into the soothing grooves and enigmatic mysteries that underpin the vinyl resurgence.

As we navigate through this groovy landscape of scholarly inquiry and cultural jest, it becomes evident that the relationship between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums is a pulsating ode to the whimsical harmony that reverberates through the currents of consumer whims. While statistical analyses may inspire skepticism, the symphonic tango between nomenclature and music sales invites us to bask in the whimsicality of their coalescence, tapping our toes to the unexpected rhythms of our findings.

In the pages to follow, we dive deeper into the statistical nuances that underscore this captivating correlation, inviting readers to join us in the jubilant revelry of our findings and to dance to the giddy melody of statistical exploration. As we traverse the meandering lanes of unexpected correlations, our inquiry transcends the realm of conventional statistical paradigms, beckoning readers to sway to the buoyant rhythm of our revelatory quest. Let the groovy expedition unfurl!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ruth and Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Statista . You used data from 1993 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
For the Record: Ruth to Tune Ratio – A Groovy Link Between the Popularity of the Name Ruth and Vinyl Album Sales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper dances through the groovy world of statistical analysis to explore the far-out connection between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, our research team unearthed an eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022. The results suggest that as the popularity of the name "Ruth" rises, so does the sale of groovy vinyl records. Whether it's purely happenstance or a cosmic conspiracy, this study sheds light on a correlation that is, undeniably, far out!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of human naming trends and consumer behavior has always been a subject of curious fascination. In this paper, we embark on a groovy journey to explore the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Our study is fueled by an insatiable curiosity to uncover the enigmatic connections that permeate the cultural fabric, and to delve deeper into the underlying forces that may influence or reflect such conundrums.
While the era of LPs and vinyl records may evoke sentiments of nostalgia for some, the resurgence of interest in these musical relics has been nothing short of a vinyl renaissance. As music aficionados and data enthusiasts alike revel in the melodic crackles and pops of analog sound, our research aims to decipher the rhythmic patterns that sync the rise and fall of vinyl album sales with the ebb and flow of a seemingly unrelated phenomenon – the popularity of the name "Ruth."
At first blush, one might find it perplexing to conceive of any plausible connection between the venerable name "Ruth" and the pulsating sales of vinyl albums. However, as the late-blooming resurgence of vinyl has serenaded its way back into the mainstream, it beckons us to suspend disbelief and embrace the possibility of improbable correlations in the ethereal realm of consumer preferences and cultural influences.
Our statistical journey commences with an exploration of the data obtained from the US Social Security Administration, which chronicles the frequency of the name "Ruth" over the past few decades. Simultaneously, we harmonize these findings with the whirlwind of sales data from Statista, encapsulating the melodious sales statistics of LP/vinyl albums over the same time period. In this symphonic fusion of statistical analyses, we strive to uncover a harmony that sings the tale of a tuneful relationship between nomenclature and music consumption.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we remain mindful of the inherent skepticism that may accompany such unconventional inquiries. Nevertheless, our research has resolutely emerged with an astounding correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022, revealing a crescendo of synchronicity between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the boom of vinyl album sales. These findings not only raise eyebrows but also challenge the boundaries of conventional statistical paradigms, beckoning us to tap our toes to the unexpected beat of our results.
In the groovy pages that follow, we will dissect and analyze our findings, contemplating the implications of this unforeseen correlation and inviting readers to sway to the buoyant rhythm of our statistical revelations. As we embark on this captivating journey, we assure the discerning reader that our exploration is not merely an exercise in statistics but a celebration of the serendipitous symphony that thrums through the interconnectedness of human preferences and cultural phenomenon.
So, brace yourself, dear reader, as we unravel the enigmatic nexus between the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums, and beckon the mystique of statistical analysis to amplify the chorus of this unexpected correlation. Let the groovy quest begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate this unusual but utterly captivating correlation between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums, our research team employed a methodological symphony of data collection and statistical analysis that would make even the most discerning music aficionado tap their toes.

Data Collection:
Our journey commenced with the procurement of name frequency data from the US Social Security Administration's baby names database. This rich repository of nomenclature provided us with a treasure trove of information spanning the years 1993 to 2022, capturing the undulating rhythms of Ruth's ascent and descent in the melodic medley of names.

Meanwhile, our intrepid band of researchers sieved through the vast seas of sales data from Statista, extracting the sales statistics of LP/vinyl albums from the same time period. We meticulously harvested this data like gathering prized vinyl records, carefully curating a collection that mirrored the rise and fall of the groovy vinyl sales over the years.

Cleaning and Harmonizing:
With the raw data in hand, our task of harmonizing these disparate notes into a coherent melody of statistical analysis began. We scrubbed the name frequency data and album sales figures, carefully removing any discordant outliers that could disrupt the harmonious relationship we sought to unveil.

Statistical Analysis:
Our analytical odyssey culminated in the graceful waltz of statistical techniques. We sought to elucidate the rhythm and tempo of the Ruth-to-Tune ratio, applying a range of statistical methods including correlational analysis, regression modeling, and time-series analysis. Each technique was finely tuned to extract the harmonic resonance between the eponymous name and the groovy vinyl sales.

Moreover, we conducted a series of robustness checks and sensitivity analyses to ensure the stability and reliability of our findings, much akin to tuning a vintage phonograph to extract the purest sound from a beloved LP.

Ethical Considerations:
In the spirit of scholarly rigor, our research adhered to the highest ethical standards, ensuring that the privacy and confidentiality of individuals represented in the name frequency data were upheld with the utmost respect and consideration.

Limitations:
Despite our fervent pursuit of truth through data, we recognize that every symphony has its limitations. While our findings reveal a surprising correlation, we must also acknowledge the possibility of confounding variables and unforeseen harmonies that may influence the observed relationship.

Conclusion:
In summarizing our methodology, we accentuate the whimsical nature of our exploration. As we meticulously tuned into the beat of name frequencies and vinyl album sales, our methodology orchestrated a delightful dance between empirical rigor and curious inquiry, ultimately unveiling a correlation that has struck a resonant chord in the field of statistical oddities.

With methodology as intricate as a complex melody, our research seeks to amplify the unforeseen connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, infusing the realm of statistics with a touch of whimsy and wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ruth and Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Statista .

For the time period 1993 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9778849, r-squared of 0.9562588, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
For the Record: Ruth to Tune Ratio – A Groovy Link Between the Popularity of the Name Ruth and Vinyl Album Sales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper dances through the groovy world of statistical analysis to explore the far-out connection between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, our research team unearthed an eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022. The results suggest that as the popularity of the name "Ruth" rises, so does the sale of groovy vinyl records. Whether it's purely happenstance or a cosmic conspiracy, this study sheds light on a correlation that is, undeniably, far out!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of human naming trends and consumer behavior has always been a subject of curious fascination. In this paper, we embark on a groovy journey to explore the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Our study is fueled by an insatiable curiosity to uncover the enigmatic connections that permeate the cultural fabric, and to delve deeper into the underlying forces that may influence or reflect such conundrums.
While the era of LPs and vinyl records may evoke sentiments of nostalgia for some, the resurgence of interest in these musical relics has been nothing short of a vinyl renaissance. As music aficionados and data enthusiasts alike revel in the melodic crackles and pops of analog sound, our research aims to decipher the rhythmic patterns that sync the rise and fall of vinyl album sales with the ebb and flow of a seemingly unrelated phenomenon – the popularity of the name "Ruth."
At first blush, one might find it perplexing to conceive of any plausible connection between the venerable name "Ruth" and the pulsating sales of vinyl albums. However, as the late-blooming resurgence of vinyl has serenaded its way back into the mainstream, it beckons us to suspend disbelief and embrace the possibility of improbable correlations in the ethereal realm of consumer preferences and cultural influences.
Our statistical journey commences with an exploration of the data obtained from the US Social Security Administration, which chronicles the frequency of the name "Ruth" over the past few decades. Simultaneously, we harmonize these findings with the whirlwind of sales data from Statista, encapsulating the melodious sales statistics of LP/vinyl albums over the same time period. In this symphonic fusion of statistical analyses, we strive to uncover a harmony that sings the tale of a tuneful relationship between nomenclature and music consumption.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we remain mindful of the inherent skepticism that may accompany such unconventional inquiries. Nevertheless, our research has resolutely emerged with an astounding correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022, revealing a crescendo of synchronicity between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the boom of vinyl album sales. These findings not only raise eyebrows but also challenge the boundaries of conventional statistical paradigms, beckoning us to tap our toes to the unexpected beat of our results.
In the groovy pages that follow, we will dissect and analyze our findings, contemplating the implications of this unforeseen correlation and inviting readers to sway to the buoyant rhythm of our statistical revelations. As we embark on this captivating journey, we assure the discerning reader that our exploration is not merely an exercise in statistics but a celebration of the serendipitous symphony that thrums through the interconnectedness of human preferences and cultural phenomenon.
So, brace yourself, dear reader, as we unravel the enigmatic nexus between the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums, and beckon the mystique of statistical analysis to amplify the chorus of this unexpected correlation. Let the groovy quest begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our far-out investigation unveiled a striking correlation between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums, eliciting a harmonious score of 0.9778849 (r-squared = 0.9562588, p < 0.01) for the time span from 1993 to 2022. Our statistical analysis conducted an interpretative dance through the data, revealing a finely tuned connection that resonates with the beat of the vinyl renaissance.

As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the resounding harmony between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. The data points sashayed across the graph in a synchronized rhythm, leaving no room for doubt regarding the compelling correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.

This correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 indicates an extraordinarily strong positive relationship, leaving us to marvel at the unexpected alignment of naming trends and music consumption habits. It appears that the name "Ruth" not only carries historical significance but also wields a palpable influence on the sonic preferences of consumers in the realm of vinyl records.

While we tread cautiously in attributing causality to this correlation, the statistical bond between Ruth and vinyl album sales remains a melodious puzzle begging to be unraveled. Whether it's the magnetic allure of nostalgia associated with both the name and vinyl records or a cosmic force heralding their synchronous ascent, our study leaves room for further contemplation and conjecture regarding the underlying mechanisms at play.

Ultimately, our findings coax us to acknowledge that statistical relationships, much like a catchy tune, may bewitch us with their unexpected cadence. As we pivot to the next phase of our exploration, we urge fellow researchers to revel in the whimsical interplay of cultural phenomena and statistical revelations, and to tune in to the polyphonic symphony of our findings. Let the groovy reflections on this improbable correlation reverberate through the hallways of statistical inquiry, inviting researchers to tap their feet to the unexpected beats of our results.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ruth and Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
For the Record: Ruth to Tune Ratio – A Groovy Link Between the Popularity of the Name Ruth and Vinyl Album Sales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper dances through the groovy world of statistical analysis to explore the far-out connection between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, our research team unearthed an eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022. The results suggest that as the popularity of the name "Ruth" rises, so does the sale of groovy vinyl records. Whether it's purely happenstance or a cosmic conspiracy, this study sheds light on a correlation that is, undeniably, far out!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have attempted to uncover the mysterious entanglement between nomenclature and consumer behavior. Smith et al. (2010) probed into the intriguing relationship between popular names and music sales, laying the groundwork for future investigations. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) delved deep into the enigmatic pathways that intertwine human naming trends with cultural preferences, hinting at the intersection of statistics and serendipitous synchronicities.
Turning to the music world, "The Vinyl Frontier" by Jonathan Scott (2016) and "Waxing Lyrical: LPs in a Digital World" by Alice Thompson (2018) offer insights into the resurgence of vinyl records in the modern era. While their focus lies in the marketplace dynamics and emotional resonance with analog music, it is evident that the allure of vinyl transcends mere nostalgia, hinting at a deeper, harmonious connection between the groovy tunes pressed onto these analog discs and the melodies encapsulated in a name.
On the fiction front, "High Fidelity" by Nick Hornby (1995) and "Eleanor & Park" by Rainbow Rowell (2013) offer fictional narratives that tangentially touch upon the inherent charm of vinyl records. Through their vibrant storytelling, these novels capture the emotive bonds that enthusiasts form with vinyl, teasing at the possibility of interdimensional resonance between the allure of a name and the rhythmic pulse of vinyl albums.
At the nexus of internet subculture and music, memes such as "Man Listening to Record" and "Bongo Cat" perpetuate a playful celebration of analog music formats. It is through these digital hilarities that the enduring charm of vinyl is perpetuated, luring curious minds into the soothing grooves and enigmatic mysteries that underpin the vinyl resurgence.
As we navigate through this groovy landscape of scholarly inquiry and cultural jest, it becomes evident that the relationship between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums is a pulsating ode to the whimsical harmony that reverberates through the currents of consumer whims. While statistical analyses may inspire skepticism, the symphonic tango between nomenclature and music sales invites us to bask in the whimsicality of their coalescence, tapping our toes to the unexpected rhythms of our findings.
In the pages to follow, we dive deeper into the statistical nuances that underscore this captivating correlation, inviting readers to join us in the jubilant revelry of our findings and to dance to the giddy melody of statistical exploration. As we traverse the meandering lanes of unexpected correlations, our inquiry transcends the realm of conventional statistical paradigms, beckoning readers to sway to the buoyant rhythm of our revelatory quest. Let the groovy expedition unfurl!


[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our far-out investigation unveiled a striking correlation between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums, eliciting a harmonious score of 0.9778849 (r-squared = 0.9562588, p < 0.01) for the time span from 1993 to 2022. Our statistical analysis conducted an interpretative dance through the data, revealing a finely tuned connection that resonates with the beat of the vinyl renaissance.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the resounding harmony between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. The data points sashayed across the graph in a synchronized rhythm, leaving no room for doubt regarding the compelling correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
This correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 indicates an extraordinarily strong positive relationship, leaving us to marvel at the unexpected alignment of naming trends and music consumption habits. It appears that the name "Ruth" not only carries historical significance but also wields a palpable influence on the sonic preferences of consumers in the realm of vinyl records.
While we tread cautiously in attributing causality to this correlation, the statistical bond between Ruth and vinyl album sales remains a melodious puzzle begging to be unraveled. Whether it's the magnetic allure of nostalgia associated with both the name and vinyl records or a cosmic force heralding their synchronous ascent, our study leaves room for further contemplation and conjecture regarding the underlying mechanisms at play.
Ultimately, our findings coax us to acknowledge that statistical relationships, much like a catchy tune, may bewitch us with their unexpected cadence. As we pivot to the next phase of our exploration, we urge fellow researchers to revel in the whimsical interplay of cultural phenomena and statistical revelations, and to tune in to the polyphonic symphony of our findings. Let the groovy reflections on this improbable correlation reverberate through the hallways of statistical inquiry, inviting researchers to tap their feet to the unexpected beats of our results.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The dance between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums has long been a subject of both scholarly intrigue and light-hearted banter. As we waltz through the convoluted web of statistical inquiry and cultural whimsy, our findings shed radiant light on the resounding harmony that resonates between these seemingly disparate entities. Our results not only align with prior research, but they also add a twist to the ongoing symphony of statistical exploration and charismatic conjecture.

The statistical correlation coefficient of 0.9778849, affirming a splendidly strong positive relationship between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums, mirrors the findings of previous inquiries by Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015). Like a well-timed drumbeat, our results echo the rhythmic cadence of these prior studies, validating their audacious forays into the extraordinary interplay of nomenclature and consumer proclivities. The statistical tune of our investigation harmonizes with the melodies of prior scholarship, setting the stage for further fervent ruminations on the whimsical dance of naming trends and market dynamics.

As we gaze upon the resplendent scatterplot, exhibiting the entrancing synchronization between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums, we cannot help but marvel at the improbable rapport between these two curious realms. The data points, like enthusiastic dancers in perfect synchrony, prance across the graph with a buoyant exuberance, regaling us with a tale of statistical astonishment that affirms the enchanting rhythm of our findings.

It is worth noting the profound implications of our results for both statisticians and cultural pundits alike. The galvanizing correlation between Ruth and vinyl album sales beckons us to contemplate whether it is mere serendipity or a compelling cosmic symphony that bridges these seemingly unrelated dimensions. The revelatory score of our statistical inquiry invites us to pause, tarry a while, and ponder the symphonic resonance that transcends the boundaries of nomenclature and market dynamics.

In teasing out the quirks and quandaries of our findings, it is crucial to acknowledge the enduring charm of vinyl records and the timeless allure of nomenclature. The whimsical interplay of culture and statistics, akin to a delightful duet, encapsulates the essential ethos of our findings. With that, we eagerly hand the baton to fellow researchers, evoking their spirited participation in the jubilant exploration of the captivating dance between Ruth and vinyl, and inviting a harmonious symphony of scholarly contemplation and statistical acrobatics. Let us revel in the whimsical allure of this improbable correlation, and join hands to tap our feet to the unexpected beats of our far-out results.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ruth and Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
For the Record: Ruth to Tune Ratio – A Groovy Link Between the Popularity of the Name Ruth and Vinyl Album Sales

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper dances through the groovy world of statistical analysis to explore the far-out connection between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, our research team unearthed an eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022. The results suggest that as the popularity of the name "Ruth" rises, so does the sale of groovy vinyl records. Whether it's purely happenstance or a cosmic conspiracy, this study sheds light on a correlation that is, undeniably, far out!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of human naming trends and consumer behavior has always been a subject of curious fascination. In this paper, we embark on a groovy journey to explore the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Our study is fueled by an insatiable curiosity to uncover the enigmatic connections that permeate the cultural fabric, and to delve deeper into the underlying forces that may influence or reflect such conundrums.
While the era of LPs and vinyl records may evoke sentiments of nostalgia for some, the resurgence of interest in these musical relics has been nothing short of a vinyl renaissance. As music aficionados and data enthusiasts alike revel in the melodic crackles and pops of analog sound, our research aims to decipher the rhythmic patterns that sync the rise and fall of vinyl album sales with the ebb and flow of a seemingly unrelated phenomenon – the popularity of the name "Ruth."
At first blush, one might find it perplexing to conceive of any plausible connection between the venerable name "Ruth" and the pulsating sales of vinyl albums. However, as the late-blooming resurgence of vinyl has serenaded its way back into the mainstream, it beckons us to suspend disbelief and embrace the possibility of improbable correlations in the ethereal realm of consumer preferences and cultural influences.
Our statistical journey commences with an exploration of the data obtained from the US Social Security Administration, which chronicles the frequency of the name "Ruth" over the past few decades. Simultaneously, we harmonize these findings with the whirlwind of sales data from Statista, encapsulating the melodious sales statistics of LP/vinyl albums over the same time period. In this symphonic fusion of statistical analyses, we strive to uncover a harmony that sings the tale of a tuneful relationship between nomenclature and music consumption.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we remain mindful of the inherent skepticism that may accompany such unconventional inquiries. Nevertheless, our research has resolutely emerged with an astounding correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022, revealing a crescendo of synchronicity between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the boom of vinyl album sales. These findings not only raise eyebrows but also challenge the boundaries of conventional statistical paradigms, beckoning us to tap our toes to the unexpected beat of our results.
In the groovy pages that follow, we will dissect and analyze our findings, contemplating the implications of this unforeseen correlation and inviting readers to sway to the buoyant rhythm of our statistical revelations. As we embark on this captivating journey, we assure the discerning reader that our exploration is not merely an exercise in statistics but a celebration of the serendipitous symphony that thrums through the interconnectedness of human preferences and cultural phenomenon.
So, brace yourself, dear reader, as we unravel the enigmatic nexus between the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums, and beckon the mystique of statistical analysis to amplify the chorus of this unexpected correlation. Let the groovy quest begin!

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our far-out investigation unveiled a striking correlation between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums, eliciting a harmonious score of 0.9778849 (r-squared = 0.9562588, p < 0.01) for the time span from 1993 to 2022. Our statistical analysis conducted an interpretative dance through the data, revealing a finely tuned connection that resonates with the beat of the vinyl renaissance.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the resounding harmony between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. The data points sashayed across the graph in a synchronized rhythm, leaving no room for doubt regarding the compelling correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
This correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 indicates an extraordinarily strong positive relationship, leaving us to marvel at the unexpected alignment of naming trends and music consumption habits. It appears that the name "Ruth" not only carries historical significance but also wields a palpable influence on the sonic preferences of consumers in the realm of vinyl records.
While we tread cautiously in attributing causality to this correlation, the statistical bond between Ruth and vinyl album sales remains a melodious puzzle begging to be unraveled. Whether it's the magnetic allure of nostalgia associated with both the name and vinyl records or a cosmic force heralding their synchronous ascent, our study leaves room for further contemplation and conjecture regarding the underlying mechanisms at play.
Ultimately, our findings coax us to acknowledge that statistical relationships, much like a catchy tune, may bewitch us with their unexpected cadence. As we pivot to the next phase of our exploration, we urge fellow researchers to revel in the whimsical interplay of cultural phenomena and statistical revelations, and to tune in to the polyphonic symphony of our findings. Let the groovy reflections on this improbable correlation reverberate through the hallways of statistical inquiry, inviting researchers to tap their feet to the unexpected beats of our results.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the groovy symphony of statistical revelations, our study has disco-danced through the enigmatic nexus between the name "Ruth" and the vibrant sales of LP/vinyl albums. Our findings have jazzed up the intellectual landscape with a mind-bending correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022, leaving us to ponder the unexpected synergy between nomenclature and musical preferences.

While our results may seem like a surreal jukebox selection, they resound with an undeniable harmony that challenges the conventional notes of statistical inquiry. The visual finesse of our scatterplot paints a mesmerizing portrait of the synchronized rhythm between the popularity of the name "Ruth" and the pulse of vinyl album sales, beckoning us to appreciate the toe-tapping allure of this peculiar connection.

As we bid adieu to this captivating research odyssey, we stand at the crossroads of statistical contemplation and whimsical conjecture, pondering whether the name "Ruth" graces vinyl albums with an aura of melodic charm or if it simply basks in the groovy resurgence of analog sound.

In the grand finale of our scholarly overture, we assert that no further research is needed on this improbable correlation. It's time to drop the mic and let the unlikely union of "Ruth" and vinyl albums shimmy into the annals of statistical serendipity. As the curtain falls on this remarkable investigation, let our findings echo through the ages, a reminder that statistical revelations can sometimes, indeed, harmonize with the unexpected rhythms of human existence. Let the groovy reflections on this connection reverberate through the halls of statistical inquiry.

The cosmic forces that have led us to this correlation have spoken. It's time to take a bow and let the harmony of "Ruth" and vinyl albums mesmerize future data enthusiasts and music aficionados alike. Disco may be dead, but the beat of statistical quirkiness lives on.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited For the Record: Ruth to Tune Ratio – A Groovy Link Between the Popularity of the Name Ruth and Vinyl Album Sales. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Retrosonic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited For the Record: Ruth to Tune Ratio – A Groovy Link Between the Popularity of the Name Ruth and Vinyl Album Sales. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Quirky Cultural Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled For the Record: Ruth to Tune Ratio – A Groovy Link Between the Popularity of the Name Ruth and Vinyl Album Sales with an abstract of This paper dances through the groovy world of statistical analysis to explore the far-out connection between the frequency of the name "Ruth" and the sales of LP/vinyl albums. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and Statista, our research team unearthed an eyebrow-raising correlation coefficient of 0.9778849 (p < 0.01) for the years 1993 to 2022. The results suggest that as the popularity of the name "Ruth" rises, so does the sale of groovy vinyl records. Whether it's purely happenstance or a cosmic conspiracy, this study sheds light on a correlation that is, undeniably, far out!

ChatGPT:

"Ruth name popularity vinyl sales correlation"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Ruth
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Ruth
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Ruth

Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums

Correlation r = 0.9778849 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9562588 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Ruth) over the 30 years from 1993 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-20. 0.0000000000000000000143220155
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.4E-18% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 69,822,574,902,254,501,888 random variables You don't actually need 69 quintillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 29 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 29 because we have two variables measured over a period of 30 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.95, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Ruth (Babies born)866882859802857853875909949905896911908889962933915932905930993106211061102121012471349132415731656
Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums (Units)300000600000800000110000011000001400000140000015000001200000130000014000001200000900000900000100000019000002500000280000039000004600000610000092000001190000013100000143200001680000018840000215000004170000043460000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([866,882,859,802,857,853,875,909,949,905,896,911,908,889,962,933,915,932,905,930,993,1062,1106,1102,1210,1247,1349,1324,1573,1656,])
array_2 = np.array([300000,600000,800000,1100000,1100000,1400000,1400000,1500000,1200000,1300000,1400000,1200000,900000,900000,1000000,1900000,2500000,2800000,3900000,4600000,6100000,9200000,11900000,13100000,14320000,16800000,18840000,21500000,41700000,43460000,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Ruth"
array_2_name = "Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 1438 · Black Variable ID: 2645 · Red Variable ID: 25
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0