about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,372 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is UFO sightings in Ohio and the second variable is USA Population.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people in Ohio reported UFO sightings, it sparked a statewide baby boom as residents realized they had a close encounter of the *thirdbirth* kind. The influx of new Ohioans ultimately led to a measurable increase in the USA population, proving that when it comes to cosmic connections, the sky's the limit for population growth! Who knew that UFOs were not just Unidentified Flying Objects, but also Unforeseen Fertility Omens!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a vibrant pop art-style visual of a bustling Ohio city at night, filled with a diverse crowd of people pointing excitedly at a glowing UFO hovering over the skyline. The UFO and the city lights should be depicted with bright, contrasting colors, capturing the energy and excitement of the scene. Highlight the diversity of the population through the variety of building styles and the mix of people in the crowd. Emphasize the sense of wonder and amazement as the citizens witness this otherworldly event. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: UFO sightings in Ohio and USA Population. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Minimalism Pop art Charcoal Celtic art
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both UFO sightings in Ohio and USA Population together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city in Ohio, a crowd of people marvel at the night sky, pointing excitedly as a glowing UFO hovers over the skyline. In the background, the city is filled with countless lights and buildings, representing the diverse and vibrant population of the USA.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city in Ohio, a crowd of people marvel at the night sky, pointing excitedly as a glowing UFO hovers over the skyline. In the background, the city is filled with countless lights and buildings, representing the diverse and vibrant population of the USA. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a vibrant pop art-style visual of a bustling Ohio city at night, filled with a diverse crowd of people pointing excitedly at a glowing UFO hovering over the skyline. The UFO and the city lights should be depicted with bright, contrasting colors, capturing the energy and excitement of the scene. Highlight the diversity of the population through the variety of building styles and the mix of people in the crowd. Emphasize the sense of wonder and amazement as the citizens witness this otherworldly event.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in UFO sightings in Ohio positively influenced USA Population. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Unidentified Flying Observations: Exploring the Relationship between UFO Sightings in Ohio and USA Population

Journal of Extraterrestrial Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Ohio and USA Population. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561 and p < 0.01 for 1975 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Unidentified Flying Observations: Exploring the Relationship between UFO Sightings in Ohio and USA Population"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Unraveling the mystery of UFO sightings has long captivated the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio, the "Buckeye State," and the ever-fluctuating population of the United States. Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we meticulously analyze sightings from 1975 to 2021 to establish a connection with the nationwide population trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561, indicative of a striking association, and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting statistical significance. While some may consider this topic to be "out of this world," our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between UFO sightings and human population dynamics, prompting both skeptics and believers to lift their gaze toward this celestial convergence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Ohio and USA Population. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Unidentified Flying Observations: Exploring the Relationship between UFO Sightings in Ohio and USA Population"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Unraveling the mystery of UFO sightings has long captivated the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio, the "Buckeye State," and the ever-fluctuating population of the United States. Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we meticulously analyze sightings from 1975 to 2021 to establish a connection with the nationwide population trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561, indicative of a striking association, and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting statistical significance. While some may consider this topic to be "out of this world," our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between UFO sightings and human population dynamics, prompting both skeptics and believers to lift their gaze toward this celestial convergence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The allure of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has permeated human curiosity, sparking countless debates, investigations, and Hollywood blockbusters. Despite the skepticism and ridicule often associated with the topic, the frequency of reported UFO sightings continues to intrigue researchers and the general public alike. While numerous studies have attempted to shed light on the enigma surrounding UFO phenomena, few have ventured to explore the potential relationship between these sightings and the ebb and flow of human population dynamics.

The state of Ohio, often dubbed the "Buckeye State," has garnered attention for its disproportionately high number of reported UFO sightings compared to its population. As the heartland of America, Ohio's connection to these aerial enigmas raises thought-provoking questions that extend beyond statistical anomalies. With a penchant for both scientific rigor and the occasional cosmic quirk, our research endeavors to unravel the potential entanglement between these sightings and the ever-evolving tapestry of the United States' populace.

Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we embark on this journey to uncover the underlying threads tying UFO phenomena to the fluctuations in the human population. By meticulously analyzing sightings from 1975 to 2021, we aim to discern whether a tangible correlation exists between the sightings in Ohio and the broader population trends across the United States. The voyage ahead promises a mixed bag of statistical rigor and the occasional cosmic whimsy, providing fertile ground for both skeptics and believers to contemplate the celestial convergence that unfolds before our eyes.

As we embark on this cosmic adventure, we urge the reader to keep a keen eye on both celestial clusters and statistical outliers. After all, sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction, and the uncharted territory of UFO sightings may hold more than meets the statistical eye. With this in mind, we invite you to join us on this journey as we explore the celestial dance between UFOs and the human populace, navigating the cosmos with equal parts scientific resolve and tongue-in-cheek wonder.

In the quest to demystify the unexplained, it is imperative to remain grounded in both empirical analysis and the occasional whimsical pondering. As we navigate through the UFO sightings and the shifting tide of population data, it is our hope that this research will both enlighten and entertain, as we strive to unravel a cosmic conundrum that has long eluded the grasp of terrestrial understanding. So, fasten your seatbelts, hold on to your skepticism, and prepare for a statistical odyssey that transcends the boundaries of the known and ventures into the uncharted realms of UFO sightings and their celestial correlation with human population dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Ohio and USA Population. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Unidentified Flying Observations: Exploring the Relationship between UFO Sightings in Ohio and USA Population"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Unraveling the mystery of UFO sightings has long captivated the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio, the "Buckeye State," and the ever-fluctuating population of the United States. Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we meticulously analyze sightings from 1975 to 2021 to establish a connection with the nationwide population trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561, indicative of a striking association, and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting statistical significance. While some may consider this topic to be "out of this world," our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between UFO sightings and human population dynamics, prompting both skeptics and believers to lift their gaze toward this celestial convergence.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The allure of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has permeated human curiosity, sparking countless debates, investigations, and Hollywood blockbusters. Despite the skepticism and ridicule often associated with the topic, the frequency of reported UFO sightings continues to intrigue researchers and the general public alike. While numerous studies have attempted to shed light on the enigma surrounding UFO phenomena, few have ventured to explore the potential relationship between these sightings and the ebb and flow of human population dynamics.
The state of Ohio, often dubbed the "Buckeye State," has garnered attention for its disproportionately high number of reported UFO sightings compared to its population. As the heartland of America, Ohio's connection to these aerial enigmas raises thought-provoking questions that extend beyond statistical anomalies. With a penchant for both scientific rigor and the occasional cosmic quirk, our research endeavors to unravel the potential entanglement between these sightings and the ever-evolving tapestry of the United States' populace.
Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we embark on this journey to uncover the underlying threads tying UFO phenomena to the fluctuations in the human population. By meticulously analyzing sightings from 1975 to 2021, we aim to discern whether a tangible correlation exists between the sightings in Ohio and the broader population trends across the United States. The voyage ahead promises a mixed bag of statistical rigor and the occasional cosmic whimsy, providing fertile ground for both skeptics and believers to contemplate the celestial convergence that unfolds before our eyes.
As we embark on this cosmic adventure, we urge the reader to keep a keen eye on both celestial clusters and statistical outliers. After all, sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction, and the uncharted territory of UFO sightings may hold more than meets the statistical eye. With this in mind, we invite you to join us on this journey as we explore the celestial dance between UFOs and the human populace, navigating the cosmos with equal parts scientific resolve and tongue-in-cheek wonder.
In the quest to demystify the unexplained, it is imperative to remain grounded in both empirical analysis and the occasional whimsical pondering. As we navigate through the UFO sightings and the shifting tide of population data, it is our hope that this research will both enlighten and entertain, as we strive to unravel a cosmic conundrum that has long eluded the grasp of terrestrial understanding. So, fasten your seatbelts, hold on to your skepticism, and prepare for a statistical odyssey that transcends the boundaries of the known and ventures into the uncharted realms of UFO sightings and their celestial correlation with human population dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between UFO sightings and human population dynamics has prompted a range of scholarly inquiries, encapsulating both statistical analyses and the occasional cosmic quirk. Smith et al. (2010) navigated the murky waters of UFO phenomena, scrutinizing various celestial sightings and their potential ties to human demographics. Likewise, Doe and Jones (2016) delved into the enigmatic world of UFO encounters, drawing attention to the need for rigorous empirical investigation into the elusive connection between these sightings and population dynamics.

On the tangentially related front, "The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry" by J. Allen Hynek seeks to strike a balance between empirical evidence and the occasional leap of faith, providing readers with a compelling narrative that transcends the boundaries of traditional scientific discourse. In a similar vein, "Communion" by Whitley Strieber offers a firsthand account of extraterrestrial encounters, merging elements of fact and fiction in a manner that blurs the line between empirical analyses and cosmic ponderings.

In the realm of internet lore, the "Aliens Guy" meme has permeated the cyberspace, serving as a whimsical reminder of the enduring fascination with extraterrestrial phenomena. Likewise, the "It's not aliens, it's never aliens" meme stands as a testament to the perennial skepticism surrounding UFO sightings, injecting a dose of levity into the ongoing discourse.

As we synthesize these diverse sources of information, it becomes apparent that the intersection of UFO sightings and human population dynamics offers a rich tapestry of empirical insights, whimsical ponderings, and the occasional cosmic quirk. While delving into this cosmic conundrum, it is imperative to maintain a keen eye for statistical rigor, coupled with the occasional nod to the inexplicable wonders that lie beyond the realm of terrestrial understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Ohio and USA Population. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica . You used data from 1975 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Unidentified Flying Observations: Exploring the Relationship between UFO Sightings in Ohio and USA Population"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Unraveling the mystery of UFO sightings has long captivated the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio, the "Buckeye State," and the ever-fluctuating population of the United States. Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we meticulously analyze sightings from 1975 to 2021 to establish a connection with the nationwide population trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561, indicative of a striking association, and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting statistical significance. While some may consider this topic to be "out of this world," our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between UFO sightings and human population dynamics, prompting both skeptics and believers to lift their gaze toward this celestial convergence.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The allure of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has permeated human curiosity, sparking countless debates, investigations, and Hollywood blockbusters. Despite the skepticism and ridicule often associated with the topic, the frequency of reported UFO sightings continues to intrigue researchers and the general public alike. While numerous studies have attempted to shed light on the enigma surrounding UFO phenomena, few have ventured to explore the potential relationship between these sightings and the ebb and flow of human population dynamics.
The state of Ohio, often dubbed the "Buckeye State," has garnered attention for its disproportionately high number of reported UFO sightings compared to its population. As the heartland of America, Ohio's connection to these aerial enigmas raises thought-provoking questions that extend beyond statistical anomalies. With a penchant for both scientific rigor and the occasional cosmic quirk, our research endeavors to unravel the potential entanglement between these sightings and the ever-evolving tapestry of the United States' populace.
Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we embark on this journey to uncover the underlying threads tying UFO phenomena to the fluctuations in the human population. By meticulously analyzing sightings from 1975 to 2021, we aim to discern whether a tangible correlation exists between the sightings in Ohio and the broader population trends across the United States. The voyage ahead promises a mixed bag of statistical rigor and the occasional cosmic whimsy, providing fertile ground for both skeptics and believers to contemplate the celestial convergence that unfolds before our eyes.
As we embark on this cosmic adventure, we urge the reader to keep a keen eye on both celestial clusters and statistical outliers. After all, sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction, and the uncharted territory of UFO sightings may hold more than meets the statistical eye. With this in mind, we invite you to join us on this journey as we explore the celestial dance between UFOs and the human populace, navigating the cosmos with equal parts scientific resolve and tongue-in-cheek wonder.
In the quest to demystify the unexplained, it is imperative to remain grounded in both empirical analysis and the occasional whimsical pondering. As we navigate through the UFO sightings and the shifting tide of population data, it is our hope that this research will both enlighten and entertain, as we strive to unravel a cosmic conundrum that has long eluded the grasp of terrestrial understanding. So, fasten your seatbelts, hold on to your skepticism, and prepare for a statistical odyssey that transcends the boundaries of the known and ventures into the uncharted realms of UFO sightings and their celestial correlation with human population dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious connection between UFO sightings and the ever-changing human populace, we employed an array of methodological approaches that allowed us to navigate the cosmic depths of statistical analysis and unearth potential correlations that may have eluded the naked eye. Our methodology, much like a spaceship navigating through the uncharted territories of the universe, aimed to meticulously gather and analyze data from reliable sources while maintaining a healthy skepticism that parallels the quest for truth amidst a plethora of celestial curiosities.

Data Collection:
We embarked on our celestial journey by gathering UFO sighting reports from the National UFO Reporting Center, which provided a comprehensive repository of sightings from enthusiasts, astronomers, and those seeking the truth beyond the confines of terrestrial existence. Additionally, we harnessed demographic data from Statsamerica, navigating through the labyrinth of population statistics, ensuring that our quest for the unknown was grounded in the empirical realities of demographic shifts across the United States.

Selection Criteria:
In order to distill the essence of the celestial convergence between UFO sightings and population dynamics, we carefully selected data spanning from 1975 to 2021. This expansive temporal window allowed us to capture the ebb and flow of both UFO sightings and population trends, akin to observing cosmic phenomena through the passage of time.

Analytical Techniques:
Our odyssey into the statistical cosmos involved a multifaceted approach, encompassing correlation analyses, trend mapping, and population density calculations. The alchemy of these analytical techniques enabled us to discern potential patterns and fluctuations in UFO sightings amidst the backdrop of the ever-evolving human populace, akin to charting constellations within the tapestry of population dynamics.

Statistical Rigor and Cosmic Whimsy:
As we traversed the statistical expanse, we remain ever-vigilant for the presence of statistical noise and cosmic oddities that may obscure or illuminate the underlying connections between UFO sightings and population dynamics. Where appropriate, we employed measures to mitigate the potential influence of confounding variables, casting a discerning scientific eye toward untangling the cosmic web of sightings and population dynamics.

Throughout our methodological voyage, we maintained a healthy balance of scientific rigor and the occasional cosmic quirk, recognizing that the pursuit of celestial truth often necessitates a blend of quantitative analysis and the whimsical pondering of the unknown. As we ventured deeper into the statistical cosmos, we remained open to the unexpected, acknowledging that even in the realm of UFO sightings, statistical anomalies and cosmic wonders may reveal themselves at the most unexpected junctures.

In our quest to demystify the enigmatic relationship between UFO sightings in Ohio and the broader population trends across the United States, we navigated the cosmic expanse with equal parts scientific resolve and tongue-in-cheek wonder, embracing the occasional statistical oddities and cosmic whimsies that characterized our methodological odyssey. Just as celestial phenomena often defy easy explanation, our methodology reflects a balanced approach that seeks to unravel the cosmic conundrum of UFO sightings with the precision of statistical analysis and the awe of cosmic discovery.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Ohio and USA Population. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica .

For the time period 1975 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7956561, r-squared of 0.6330686, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Unidentified Flying Observations: Exploring the Relationship between UFO Sightings in Ohio and USA Population"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Unraveling the mystery of UFO sightings has long captivated the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio, the "Buckeye State," and the ever-fluctuating population of the United States. Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we meticulously analyze sightings from 1975 to 2021 to establish a connection with the nationwide population trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561, indicative of a striking association, and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting statistical significance. While some may consider this topic to be "out of this world," our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between UFO sightings and human population dynamics, prompting both skeptics and believers to lift their gaze toward this celestial convergence.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The allure of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has permeated human curiosity, sparking countless debates, investigations, and Hollywood blockbusters. Despite the skepticism and ridicule often associated with the topic, the frequency of reported UFO sightings continues to intrigue researchers and the general public alike. While numerous studies have attempted to shed light on the enigma surrounding UFO phenomena, few have ventured to explore the potential relationship between these sightings and the ebb and flow of human population dynamics.
The state of Ohio, often dubbed the "Buckeye State," has garnered attention for its disproportionately high number of reported UFO sightings compared to its population. As the heartland of America, Ohio's connection to these aerial enigmas raises thought-provoking questions that extend beyond statistical anomalies. With a penchant for both scientific rigor and the occasional cosmic quirk, our research endeavors to unravel the potential entanglement between these sightings and the ever-evolving tapestry of the United States' populace.
Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we embark on this journey to uncover the underlying threads tying UFO phenomena to the fluctuations in the human population. By meticulously analyzing sightings from 1975 to 2021, we aim to discern whether a tangible correlation exists between the sightings in Ohio and the broader population trends across the United States. The voyage ahead promises a mixed bag of statistical rigor and the occasional cosmic whimsy, providing fertile ground for both skeptics and believers to contemplate the celestial convergence that unfolds before our eyes.
As we embark on this cosmic adventure, we urge the reader to keep a keen eye on both celestial clusters and statistical outliers. After all, sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction, and the uncharted territory of UFO sightings may hold more than meets the statistical eye. With this in mind, we invite you to join us on this journey as we explore the celestial dance between UFOs and the human populace, navigating the cosmos with equal parts scientific resolve and tongue-in-cheek wonder.
In the quest to demystify the unexplained, it is imperative to remain grounded in both empirical analysis and the occasional whimsical pondering. As we navigate through the UFO sightings and the shifting tide of population data, it is our hope that this research will both enlighten and entertain, as we strive to unravel a cosmic conundrum that has long eluded the grasp of terrestrial understanding. So, fasten your seatbelts, hold on to your skepticism, and prepare for a statistical odyssey that transcends the boundaries of the known and ventures into the uncharted realms of UFO sightings and their celestial correlation with human population dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our rigorous analysis of the relationship between UFO sightings in Ohio and the population of the United States from 1975 to 2021 has yielded fascinating results. We found a significant positive correlation between these two variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561 and an r-squared value of 0.6330686, indicating that approximately 63% of the variability in UFO sightings can be explained by changes in the U.S. population. The calculated p-value of less than 0.01 further accentuates the statistical significance of this correlation.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the robust association between UFO sightings in Ohio and the U.S. population. The data points exhibit a clear pattern, reminiscent of a cosmic dance choreographed by population dynamics and celestial phenomena, highlighting the celestial convergence that permeates our statistical analysis.

These findings not only underscore the statistical link between UFO sightings and population dynamics but also invite contemplation of the interplay between terrestrial demographics and extraterrestrial observations. While we acknowledge the inherent quirkiness of this research topic, it is imperative to approach the findings with a balance of empirical scrutiny and a twinkle of cosmic curiosity.

The cosmic whimsy infused in our approach to this study serves as a gentle reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there is ample room for wonder and speculative pondering. As researchers, we pride ourselves on navigating uncharted territories of inquiry, and this study embodies the fusion of scientific rigor and the occasional wink toward the unknown.

In conclusion, our results illuminate a palpable correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio and the broader U.S. population, beckoning us to further explore the cosmic dance between these two variables. As we lift our gaze toward the enigmatic skies, we urge the scientific community to embrace the peculiarities that abound in our quest for knowledge, for sometimes the statistical truth lies beyond the confines of conventional understanding.

In the words of the celestial statisticians, "May the correlation be with you."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Ohio and USA Population. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Unidentified Flying Observations: Exploring the Relationship between UFO Sightings in Ohio and USA Population"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Unraveling the mystery of UFO sightings has long captivated the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio, the "Buckeye State," and the ever-fluctuating population of the United States. Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we meticulously analyze sightings from 1975 to 2021 to establish a connection with the nationwide population trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561, indicative of a striking association, and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting statistical significance. While some may consider this topic to be "out of this world," our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between UFO sightings and human population dynamics, prompting both skeptics and believers to lift their gaze toward this celestial convergence.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between UFO sightings and human population dynamics has prompted a range of scholarly inquiries, encapsulating both statistical analyses and the occasional cosmic quirk. Smith et al. (2010) navigated the murky waters of UFO phenomena, scrutinizing various celestial sightings and their potential ties to human demographics. Likewise, Doe and Jones (2016) delved into the enigmatic world of UFO encounters, drawing attention to the need for rigorous empirical investigation into the elusive connection between these sightings and population dynamics.
On the tangentially related front, "The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry" by J. Allen Hynek seeks to strike a balance between empirical evidence and the occasional leap of faith, providing readers with a compelling narrative that transcends the boundaries of traditional scientific discourse. In a similar vein, "Communion" by Whitley Strieber offers a firsthand account of extraterrestrial encounters, merging elements of fact and fiction in a manner that blurs the line between empirical analyses and cosmic ponderings.
In the realm of internet lore, the "Aliens Guy" meme has permeated the cyberspace, serving as a whimsical reminder of the enduring fascination with extraterrestrial phenomena. Likewise, the "It's not aliens, it's never aliens" meme stands as a testament to the perennial skepticism surrounding UFO sightings, injecting a dose of levity into the ongoing discourse.
As we synthesize these diverse sources of information, it becomes apparent that the intersection of UFO sightings and human population dynamics offers a rich tapestry of empirical insights, whimsical ponderings, and the occasional cosmic quirk. While delving into this cosmic conundrum, it is imperative to maintain a keen eye for statistical rigor, coupled with the occasional nod to the inexplicable wonders that lie beyond the realm of terrestrial understanding.

[[RESULTS]]
Our rigorous analysis of the relationship between UFO sightings in Ohio and the population of the United States from 1975 to 2021 has yielded fascinating results. We found a significant positive correlation between these two variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561 and an r-squared value of 0.6330686, indicating that approximately 63% of the variability in UFO sightings can be explained by changes in the U.S. population. The calculated p-value of less than 0.01 further accentuates the statistical significance of this correlation.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the robust association between UFO sightings in Ohio and the U.S. population. The data points exhibit a clear pattern, reminiscent of a cosmic dance choreographed by population dynamics and celestial phenomena, highlighting the celestial convergence that permeates our statistical analysis.
These findings not only underscore the statistical link between UFO sightings and population dynamics but also invite contemplation of the interplay between terrestrial demographics and extraterrestrial observations. While we acknowledge the inherent quirkiness of this research topic, it is imperative to approach the findings with a balance of empirical scrutiny and a twinkle of cosmic curiosity.
The cosmic whimsy infused in our approach to this study serves as a gentle reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there is ample room for wonder and speculative pondering. As researchers, we pride ourselves on navigating uncharted territories of inquiry, and this study embodies the fusion of scientific rigor and the occasional wink toward the unknown.
In conclusion, our results illuminate a palpable correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio and the broader U.S. population, beckoning us to further explore the cosmic dance between these two variables. As we lift our gaze toward the enigmatic skies, we urge the scientific community to embrace the peculiarities that abound in our quest for knowledge, for sometimes the statistical truth lies beyond the confines of conventional understanding.
In the words of the celestial statisticians, "May the correlation be with you."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings not only support previous research by Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2016) but also offer a statistically significant backing to the whimsical ponderings that have shaped the discourse on UFO sightings and human population dynamics. The correlation coefficient of 0.7956561 provides empirical weight to the cosmic quirk that captivates observers of celestial phenomena. It seems that the "out of this world" musings of J. Allen Hynek and the extraterrestrial encounters documented by Whitley Strieber have received an unexpected boost from the realm of statistical analysis.

The connection between UFO sightings in Ohio and the USA population, as depicted in our scatterplot (Figure 1), resembles a dance between earthly demographics and celestial marvels. We are reminded that the statistical ballet is not without its cosmic charm, hinting at a celestial convergence that manifests in the patterns of our data points. One might even say that this correlation is, quite literally, "out of this world."

While the proliferation of the "It's not aliens, it's never aliens" meme in online circles has cultivated a healthy dose of skepticism, our results beckon skeptics and enthusiasts alike to acknowledge the statistical reality that lies within this unconventional realm of inquiry. Perhaps, in the spirit of embracing the inexplicable wonders of our universe, we can find room for statistical rigor and a dash of cosmic curiosity.

In the cosmic tapestry of empirical insights and speculative mysteries, our study offers a gentle reminder that statistical analysis need not stray far from the realm of wonder. Therefore, as we navigate the uncharted territories of inquiry, let us not forget the whimsy that can be found in even the most rigorous statistical pursuits.

A statistical truth beheld, indeed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Ohio and USA Population. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Unidentified Flying Observations: Exploring the Relationship between UFO Sightings in Ohio and USA Population"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Unraveling the mystery of UFO sightings has long captivated the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio, the "Buckeye State," and the ever-fluctuating population of the United States. Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we meticulously analyze sightings from 1975 to 2021 to establish a connection with the nationwide population trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561, indicative of a striking association, and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting statistical significance. While some may consider this topic to be "out of this world," our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between UFO sightings and human population dynamics, prompting both skeptics and believers to lift their gaze toward this celestial convergence.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The allure of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has permeated human curiosity, sparking countless debates, investigations, and Hollywood blockbusters. Despite the skepticism and ridicule often associated with the topic, the frequency of reported UFO sightings continues to intrigue researchers and the general public alike. While numerous studies have attempted to shed light on the enigma surrounding UFO phenomena, few have ventured to explore the potential relationship between these sightings and the ebb and flow of human population dynamics.
The state of Ohio, often dubbed the "Buckeye State," has garnered attention for its disproportionately high number of reported UFO sightings compared to its population. As the heartland of America, Ohio's connection to these aerial enigmas raises thought-provoking questions that extend beyond statistical anomalies. With a penchant for both scientific rigor and the occasional cosmic quirk, our research endeavors to unravel the potential entanglement between these sightings and the ever-evolving tapestry of the United States' populace.
Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we embark on this journey to uncover the underlying threads tying UFO phenomena to the fluctuations in the human population. By meticulously analyzing sightings from 1975 to 2021, we aim to discern whether a tangible correlation exists between the sightings in Ohio and the broader population trends across the United States. The voyage ahead promises a mixed bag of statistical rigor and the occasional cosmic whimsy, providing fertile ground for both skeptics and believers to contemplate the celestial convergence that unfolds before our eyes.
As we embark on this cosmic adventure, we urge the reader to keep a keen eye on both celestial clusters and statistical outliers. After all, sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction, and the uncharted territory of UFO sightings may hold more than meets the statistical eye. With this in mind, we invite you to join us on this journey as we explore the celestial dance between UFOs and the human populace, navigating the cosmos with equal parts scientific resolve and tongue-in-cheek wonder.
In the quest to demystify the unexplained, it is imperative to remain grounded in both empirical analysis and the occasional whimsical pondering. As we navigate through the UFO sightings and the shifting tide of population data, it is our hope that this research will both enlighten and entertain, as we strive to unravel a cosmic conundrum that has long eluded the grasp of terrestrial understanding. So, fasten your seatbelts, hold on to your skepticism, and prepare for a statistical odyssey that transcends the boundaries of the known and ventures into the uncharted realms of UFO sightings and their celestial correlation with human population dynamics.

[[RESULTS]]
Our rigorous analysis of the relationship between UFO sightings in Ohio and the population of the United States from 1975 to 2021 has yielded fascinating results. We found a significant positive correlation between these two variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561 and an r-squared value of 0.6330686, indicating that approximately 63% of the variability in UFO sightings can be explained by changes in the U.S. population. The calculated p-value of less than 0.01 further accentuates the statistical significance of this correlation.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually depicts the robust association between UFO sightings in Ohio and the U.S. population. The data points exhibit a clear pattern, reminiscent of a cosmic dance choreographed by population dynamics and celestial phenomena, highlighting the celestial convergence that permeates our statistical analysis.
These findings not only underscore the statistical link between UFO sightings and population dynamics but also invite contemplation of the interplay between terrestrial demographics and extraterrestrial observations. While we acknowledge the inherent quirkiness of this research topic, it is imperative to approach the findings with a balance of empirical scrutiny and a twinkle of cosmic curiosity.
The cosmic whimsy infused in our approach to this study serves as a gentle reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there is ample room for wonder and speculative pondering. As researchers, we pride ourselves on navigating uncharted territories of inquiry, and this study embodies the fusion of scientific rigor and the occasional wink toward the unknown.
In conclusion, our results illuminate a palpable correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio and the broader U.S. population, beckoning us to further explore the cosmic dance between these two variables. As we lift our gaze toward the enigmatic skies, we urge the scientific community to embrace the peculiarities that abound in our quest for knowledge, for sometimes the statistical truth lies beyond the confines of conventional understanding.
In the words of the celestial statisticians, "May the correlation be with you."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In summary, our research has unveiled a statistically significant correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio and the fluctuating population of the United States, revealing a cosmic dance that transcends terrestrial understanding. As we reflect on the celestial convergence, it is evident that the interplay between these variables may hold the key to unlocking cosmic mysteries that have long eluded empirical grasp. Perhaps it is time for the scientific community to cast a broader net in exploring the extraterrestrial link to human population dynamics, for the truth may indeed be out there – statistically speaking.

Given the captivating nature of our findings and the occasional wink toward cosmic whimsy, it is tempting to delve deeper into the cosmic ballet of UFO sightings and human demographics. However, considering the otherworldly realm of this subject, we believe that this study has sufficiently probed the statistical UFO-sightings-population correlation, and it is time to set our sights on other statistical puzzles.

Therefore, we confidently assert that as far as UFO sightings in Ohio and their correlation with U.S. population are concerned, no further research is needed. After all, in the universe of statistical inquiry, there are always more galaxies to explore, and new statistical anomalies to unravel. Let us boldly go forth and conquer new statistical frontiers, armed with the knowledge that sometimes, statistical truth can be stranger than science fiction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Unidentified Flying Observations: Exploring the Relationship between UFO Sightings in Ohio and USA Population. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Extraterrestrial Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Unidentified Flying Observations: Exploring the Relationship between UFO Sightings in Ohio and USA Population. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Center for Extraterrestrial Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Unidentified Flying Observations: Exploring the Relationship between UFO Sightings in Ohio and USA Population with an abstract of Unraveling the mystery of UFO sightings has long captivated the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in Ohio, the "Buckeye State," and the ever-fluctuating population of the United States. Leveraging data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Statsamerica, we meticulously analyze sightings from 1975 to 2021 to establish a connection with the nationwide population trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.7956561, indicative of a striking association, and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting statistical significance. While some may consider this topic to be "out of this world," our research aims to shed light on the enigmatic relationship between UFO sightings and human population dynamics, prompting both skeptics and believers to lift their gaze toward this celestial convergence.

ChatGPT:

UFO sightings, Ohio, United States, population, correlation, National UFO Reporting Center, Statsamerica, Buckeye State, statistical significance, human population dynamics, celestial convergence, unidentified flying objects, correlation coefficient, p-value, sightings analysis, UFO research, enigmatic relationship

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

UFO sightings in Ohio
Detailed data title: UFO sightings reported in Ohio
Source: National UFO Reporting Center
See what else correlates with UFO sightings in Ohio

USA Population
Source: Statsamerica
See what else correlates with USA Population

Correlation r = 0.7956561 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6330686 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., USA Population) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., UFO sightings in Ohio) over the 47 years from 1975 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.3E-11. 0.0000000000234502668770937270
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 2.3E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 42,643,437,929 random variables You don't actually need 42 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 46 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 46 because we have two variables measured over a period of 47 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.88 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19751976197719781979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
UFO sightings in Ohio (UFO sightings)11171196987310887105561014262523265912075908611112383931111301271231512633482702021511388317417244
USA Population (Population)215465000217563000219760000222095000224567000226546000229466000231664000233792000235825000237924000240133000242289000244499000246819000248791000252153000255030000257783000260327000262803000265229000267784000270248000272691000281422000285040000287727000290211000292892000295561000298363000301290000304060000306772000308746000313877000316651000319375000322034000324608000327210000329791000332140000334320000335942000336998000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11,17,11,9,6,9,8,7,3,10,8,8,7,10,5,5,6,10,14,26,25,23,26,59,120,75,90,86,111,123,83,93,111,130,127,123,151,263,348,270,202,151,138,83,174,172,44,])
array_2 = np.array([215465000,217563000,219760000,222095000,224567000,226546000,229466000,231664000,233792000,235825000,237924000,240133000,242289000,244499000,246819000,248791000,252153000,255030000,257783000,260327000,262803000,265229000,267784000,270248000,272691000,281422000,285040000,287727000,290211000,292892000,295561000,298363000,301290000,304060000,306772000,308746000,313877000,316651000,319375000,322034000,324608000,327210000,329791000,332140000,334320000,335942000,336998000,])
array_1_name = "UFO sightings in Ohio"
array_2_name = "USA Population"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1372 · Black Variable ID: 1155 · Red Variable ID: 266
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0