about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,304 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in New York City and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality in New York City improved, it led to the spontaneous manifestation of aero-kinetic energy fields. These invisible energy fields, in a quirky turn of events, interacted specifically with BMW vehicles, causing their automotive components to unexpectedly rev up and demand a recall. This phenomenon, now known as the "Manhattan Motorized Manifestation," has left both engineers and yoga enthusiasts baffled as they try to strike a balance between emissions and automotive om-otions.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration set in the 1960s, featuring a bustling New York City street with a modern twist. The scene showcases a bright, cloudless sky above the city, where people are joyfully walking and taking deep breaths of fresh, clean air. In the distance, several BMW vehicles are parked on the street. As the air clears, the unpleasant odors from the faulty vehicles become more noticeable, prompting concerned looks from the passersby. The illustration concludes with an image of the BMW of North America office, where preparations are underway for issuing automotive recalls to address the issue. The muted colors and dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s should be incorporated to evoke the comic book style. The overall visual should be simple and visually compelling. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because with the improved air quality, New Yorkers were able to smell more clearly, leading to an increased awareness of the unpleasant odors coming from the faulty BMW vehicles, prompting BMW of North America to issue more automotive recalls.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Parallax art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s 3D Pixar Style Concept art
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Because with the improved air quality, New Yorkers were able to smell more clearly, leading to an increased awareness of the unpleasant odors coming from the faulty BMW vehicles, prompting BMW of North America to issue more automotive recalls.
ChatGPT: In the scene, we see a bustling city street in New York with clear blue skies and fresh, clean air. People on the street are taking deep breaths and smiling as they walk. In the distance, we see a group of BMW vehicles parked on the side of the road. As the air clears, the unpleasant smells emanating from the faulty vehicles become more noticeable, prompting concerned looks from pedestrians. We then observe BMW of North America's office as they announce and prepare to issue more automotive recalls to address the issue.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, we see a bustling city street in New York with clear blue skies and fresh, clean air. People on the street are taking deep breaths and smiling as they walk. In the distance, we see a group of BMW vehicles parked on the side of the road. As the air clears, the unpleasant smells emanating from the faulty vehicles become more noticeable, prompting concerned looks from pedestrians. We then observe BMW of North America's office as they announce and prepare to issue more automotive recalls to address the issue. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration set in the 1960s, featuring a bustling New York City street with a modern twist. The scene showcases a bright, cloudless sky above the city, where people are joyfully walking and taking deep breaths of fresh, clean air. In the distance, several BMW vehicles are parked on the street. As the air clears, the unpleasant odors from the faulty vehicles become more noticeable, prompting concerned looks from the passersby. The illustration concludes with an image of the BMW of North America office, where preparations are underway for issuing automotive recalls to address the issue. The muted colors and dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s should be incorporated to evoke the comic book style. The overall visual should be simple and visually compelling.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in New York City caused Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Pollution Predicament: How BMW Recalls Drive Through NYC Air Quality

The Journal of Environmental Engineering and Witty Wordplay

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8060044 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Pollution Predicament: How BMW Recalls Drive Through NYC Air Quality

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we rev up our engines and hit the brakes on a peculiar connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. With a nose for anomalies, our data-driven study takes a deep dive into the Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Transportation databases from 1980 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8060044 and a p-value of less than 0.01. So, fasten your seatbelts and join us as we navigate the unexpected twists and turns of this statistical road trip, proving that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the connection is not just exhaust-ive, but truly tire-rific.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Pollution Predicament: How BMW Recalls Drive Through NYC Air Quality

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we rev up our engines and hit the brakes on a peculiar connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. With a nose for anomalies, our data-driven study takes a deep dive into the Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Transportation databases from 1980 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8060044 and a p-value of less than 0.01. So, fasten your seatbelts and join us as we navigate the unexpected twists and turns of this statistical road trip, proving that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the connection is not just exhaust-ive, but truly tire-rific.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the iconic New York City skyline stands tall, a hidden link between the air quality in this bustling metropolis and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America emerges from the exhaust fumes. While it's common knowledge that the Big Apple's air quality can be a bit "foggy" at times, what might surprise even the most seasoned city dwellers is the correlation between this environmental factor and the automotive hiccups experienced by BMW.

In the realm of statistical exploration, it's not every day that one gets the chance to marry the urban air quality with the automotive industry, but as they say, when life hands you data, make statistical lemonade. Our study delves into this bizarre but intriguing connection, uncovering surprising insights that couldn't be brushed off as mere coincidence.

So buckle up, ladies and gentlemen, because this statistical joyride is about to take you on a journey through pollutant-laden avenues and recall-riddled roads, revealing how these two seemingly distinct realms are intricately intertwined in ways that will blow your statistical mind. Rest assured, by the time we're finished, you'll be able to decode this empirical conundrum with the ease of a GPS guiding you through rush hour traffic.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Pollution Predicament: How BMW Recalls Drive Through NYC Air Quality

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we rev up our engines and hit the brakes on a peculiar connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. With a nose for anomalies, our data-driven study takes a deep dive into the Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Transportation databases from 1980 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8060044 and a p-value of less than 0.01. So, fasten your seatbelts and join us as we navigate the unexpected twists and turns of this statistical road trip, proving that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the connection is not just exhaust-ive, but truly tire-rific.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the iconic New York City skyline stands tall, a hidden link between the air quality in this bustling metropolis and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America emerges from the exhaust fumes. While it's common knowledge that the Big Apple's air quality can be a bit "foggy" at times, what might surprise even the most seasoned city dwellers is the correlation between this environmental factor and the automotive hiccups experienced by BMW.
In the realm of statistical exploration, it's not every day that one gets the chance to marry the urban air quality with the automotive industry, but as they say, when life hands you data, make statistical lemonade. Our study delves into this bizarre but intriguing connection, uncovering surprising insights that couldn't be brushed off as mere coincidence.
So buckle up, ladies and gentlemen, because this statistical joyride is about to take you on a journey through pollutant-laden avenues and recall-riddled roads, revealing how these two seemingly distinct realms are intricately intertwined in ways that will blow your statistical mind. Rest assured, by the time we're finished, you'll be able to decode this empirical conundrum with the ease of a GPS guiding you through rush hour traffic.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature on the relationship between air quality in urban environments and automotive recalls is, paradoxically, a mixed bag of serious academic research and unexpected detours into pop culture references that are sure to rev up your engines. In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) investigate the impact of air pollutants on vehicle performance, shedding light on the potential implications for automotive recalls. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) examine the role of environmental regulations on the automotive industry, providing valuable insights into the complex dynamics at play.

Moving beyond the realm of traditional scholarly works, one cannot ignore the practical wisdom imparted by non-fiction books such as "The Economics of Air Quality" by Johnson (2017) and "Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do" by Vanderbilt (2008). These seminal works offer a holistic view of the factors influencing air quality and vehicular operations, offering a roadmap for understanding the intersection of environmental concerns and automotive engineering.

However, the literature takes an unexpected turn on the road to scholarly inquiry as we encounter fiction books that seemingly veer off course but, surprisingly, have relevance to our topic. In "Chasing Air: A Novel of Suspense" by Green (2019), the protagonist's quest for clean air leads to startling discoveries about automotive malfunctions and their environmental repercussions. Similarly, "The Recalled Adventures of Alice in Vehicular Land" by Carroll (1865) takes readers on a whimsical journey through the automotive wonderland, offering allegorical insights into the interplay between air quality and automotive recalls.

As we navigate the twists and turns of this scholarly journey, it would be remiss not to acknowledge the influence of popular culture on our understanding of automotive recalls and air quality. Cartoons such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and children's shows like "The Magic School Bus" may not be traditional sources of academic inquiry, but their portrayal of environmental themes and automotive escapades provides a surprisingly relevant backdrop for our statistical exploration. With their colorful characters and larger-than-life adventures, these shows unwittingly drive home important lessons about the interconnectedness of environmental stewardship and vehicular reliability.

In summary, the literature, while often serious and scholarly, also presents unexpected and delightful deviations into the world of fiction and popular culture, reminding us that statistical inquiry can be as exhilarating as a thrilling drive through the city streets - and just as unpredictable!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT . You used data from 1980 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Pollution Predicament: How BMW Recalls Drive Through NYC Air Quality

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we rev up our engines and hit the brakes on a peculiar connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. With a nose for anomalies, our data-driven study takes a deep dive into the Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Transportation databases from 1980 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8060044 and a p-value of less than 0.01. So, fasten your seatbelts and join us as we navigate the unexpected twists and turns of this statistical road trip, proving that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the connection is not just exhaust-ive, but truly tire-rific.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the iconic New York City skyline stands tall, a hidden link between the air quality in this bustling metropolis and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America emerges from the exhaust fumes. While it's common knowledge that the Big Apple's air quality can be a bit "foggy" at times, what might surprise even the most seasoned city dwellers is the correlation between this environmental factor and the automotive hiccups experienced by BMW.
In the realm of statistical exploration, it's not every day that one gets the chance to marry the urban air quality with the automotive industry, but as they say, when life hands you data, make statistical lemonade. Our study delves into this bizarre but intriguing connection, uncovering surprising insights that couldn't be brushed off as mere coincidence.
So buckle up, ladies and gentlemen, because this statistical joyride is about to take you on a journey through pollutant-laden avenues and recall-riddled roads, revealing how these two seemingly distinct realms are intricately intertwined in ways that will blow your statistical mind. Rest assured, by the time we're finished, you'll be able to decode this empirical conundrum with the ease of a GPS guiding you through rush hour traffic.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between New York City's air quality and BMW automotive recalls, our research team employed a rigorous, albeit unconventional, methodology that would make even the savviest statistician raise an eyebrow. Initially, we scoured the virtual highways and byways of the internet, making pit stops at the Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Transportation databases. We meticulously sifted through a treasure trove of data spanning from 1980 to 2022, navigating through the digital traffic jams and detours to collect the most comprehensive dataset possible.

Our data collection process was akin to a thrilling race, with each click and download bringing us closer to the finish line of empirical enlightenment. We exercised utmost caution to ensure that our dataset was free from data potholes and statistical speed bumps, guaranteeing a smooth ride through the analytical landscape ahead.

Once the data was securely in our possession, we initiated a series of sophisticated statistical analyses that would make even the most seasoned analysts do a double take. Our approach combined elements of correlation analysis, time series analysis, and regression modeling to disentangle the complex web of factors intertwining urban air quality and automotive recalls. Buckle up, because we even threw in some innovative machine learning algorithms to turbocharge our insights and navigate the twists and turns of this statistical journey.

Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we implemented rigorous sensitivity analyses and robustness checks, like mechanics scrutinizing every part of an engine to ensure peak performance. This allowed us to scrutinize our statistical engine and confirm that our results were not merely a statistical fluke.

In short, our methodology was a statistical road trip through the realms of data collection and analysis, fusing traditional statistical techniques with cutting-edge methodologies to shine a high-beam light on the unexpected nexus between air quality in New York City and BMW automotive recalls. So fasten your seatbelts and join us as we cruise through this methodological adventure, leaving no statistical stone unturned as we approach the finish line of empirical discovery.

And remember, when it comes to statistical methodology, sometimes you have to drive off the beaten path to reach the most remarkable destinations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT .

For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8060044, r-squared of 0.6496430, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Pollution Predicament: How BMW Recalls Drive Through NYC Air Quality

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we rev up our engines and hit the brakes on a peculiar connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. With a nose for anomalies, our data-driven study takes a deep dive into the Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Transportation databases from 1980 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8060044 and a p-value of less than 0.01. So, fasten your seatbelts and join us as we navigate the unexpected twists and turns of this statistical road trip, proving that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the connection is not just exhaust-ive, but truly tire-rific.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the iconic New York City skyline stands tall, a hidden link between the air quality in this bustling metropolis and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America emerges from the exhaust fumes. While it's common knowledge that the Big Apple's air quality can be a bit "foggy" at times, what might surprise even the most seasoned city dwellers is the correlation between this environmental factor and the automotive hiccups experienced by BMW.
In the realm of statistical exploration, it's not every day that one gets the chance to marry the urban air quality with the automotive industry, but as they say, when life hands you data, make statistical lemonade. Our study delves into this bizarre but intriguing connection, uncovering surprising insights that couldn't be brushed off as mere coincidence.
So buckle up, ladies and gentlemen, because this statistical joyride is about to take you on a journey through pollutant-laden avenues and recall-riddled roads, revealing how these two seemingly distinct realms are intricately intertwined in ways that will blow your statistical mind. Rest assured, by the time we're finished, you'll be able to decode this empirical conundrum with the ease of a GPS guiding you through rush hour traffic.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study reveal an unexpected and statistically significant connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8060044, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6496430 suggests that approximately 65% of the variability in BMW automotive recalls can be explained by changes in air quality in New York City over the specified time period, from 1980 to 2022. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides robust evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables.

Fig. 1, which we are eagerly revving to share, illustrates the scatterplot depicting this noteworthy correlation. As we take a pit-stop to appreciate this figure, it becomes clear that as air quality worsens, the number of automotive recalls by BMW tends to increase, suggesting a pollution-pull on the automotive industry. This relationship is not just statistical, but also visually compelling, demonstrating a strong linear pattern that zips through the data points with all the finesse of a well-tuned sports car navigating a winding road.

In this statistical odyssey, our findings resonate like the revving of an engine, proving that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the connection isn't just a fume-y illusion but a robust statistical reality. So, as we put the brakes on this results section, we invite the reader to buckle up for the discussion and implications that are sure to be a "drive" for unexpected insights and pun-derful revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Pollution Predicament: How BMW Recalls Drive Through NYC Air Quality

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we rev up our engines and hit the brakes on a peculiar connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. With a nose for anomalies, our data-driven study takes a deep dive into the Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Transportation databases from 1980 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8060044 and a p-value of less than 0.01. So, fasten your seatbelts and join us as we navigate the unexpected twists and turns of this statistical road trip, proving that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the connection is not just exhaust-ive, but truly tire-rific.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the relationship between air quality in urban environments and automotive recalls is, paradoxically, a mixed bag of serious academic research and unexpected detours into pop culture references that are sure to rev up your engines. In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) investigate the impact of air pollutants on vehicle performance, shedding light on the potential implications for automotive recalls. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) examine the role of environmental regulations on the automotive industry, providing valuable insights into the complex dynamics at play.
Moving beyond the realm of traditional scholarly works, one cannot ignore the practical wisdom imparted by non-fiction books such as "The Economics of Air Quality" by Johnson (2017) and "Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do" by Vanderbilt (2008). These seminal works offer a holistic view of the factors influencing air quality and vehicular operations, offering a roadmap for understanding the intersection of environmental concerns and automotive engineering.
However, the literature takes an unexpected turn on the road to scholarly inquiry as we encounter fiction books that seemingly veer off course but, surprisingly, have relevance to our topic. In "Chasing Air: A Novel of Suspense" by Green (2019), the protagonist's quest for clean air leads to startling discoveries about automotive malfunctions and their environmental repercussions. Similarly, "The Recalled Adventures of Alice in Vehicular Land" by Carroll (1865) takes readers on a whimsical journey through the automotive wonderland, offering allegorical insights into the interplay between air quality and automotive recalls.
As we navigate the twists and turns of this scholarly journey, it would be remiss not to acknowledge the influence of popular culture on our understanding of automotive recalls and air quality. Cartoons such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and children's shows like "The Magic School Bus" may not be traditional sources of academic inquiry, but their portrayal of environmental themes and automotive escapades provides a surprisingly relevant backdrop for our statistical exploration. With their colorful characters and larger-than-life adventures, these shows unwittingly drive home important lessons about the interconnectedness of environmental stewardship and vehicular reliability.
In summary, the literature, while often serious and scholarly, also presents unexpected and delightful deviations into the world of fiction and popular culture, reminding us that statistical inquiry can be as exhilarating as a thrilling drive through the city streets - and just as unpredictable!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study reveal an unexpected and statistically significant connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8060044, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6496430 suggests that approximately 65% of the variability in BMW automotive recalls can be explained by changes in air quality in New York City over the specified time period, from 1980 to 2022. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides robust evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables.
Fig. 1, which we are eagerly revving to share, illustrates the scatterplot depicting this noteworthy correlation. As we take a pit-stop to appreciate this figure, it becomes clear that as air quality worsens, the number of automotive recalls by BMW tends to increase, suggesting a pollution-pull on the automotive industry. This relationship is not just statistical, but also visually compelling, demonstrating a strong linear pattern that zips through the data points with all the finesse of a well-tuned sports car navigating a winding road.
In this statistical odyssey, our findings resonate like the revving of an engine, proving that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the connection isn't just a fume-y illusion but a robust statistical reality. So, as we put the brakes on this results section, we invite the reader to buckle up for the discussion and implications that are sure to be a "drive" for unexpected insights and pun-derful revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The road we've traveled in this study has been long and winding, much like a slow commute through the streets of New York City. Our findings have not only filled our tires with air of statistical significance, but they have also left us pondering the peculiar connection between air quality and automotive recalls. As we shift into the discussion phase, let's take a moment to reflect on the unexpected twists and pun-derful revelations that have emerged.

First and foremost, our results have revved up some interesting implications for both environmental and automotive industries. The surprisingly strong positive correlation between air quality in NYC and BMW automotive recalls not only supports the serious scholarly works of Smith and Doe (2015) and Jones et al. (2018) but also adds a turbocharged boost to the findings of the fiction and popular culture references we encountered in our literature review. From Green's "Chasing Air" to Carroll's "Recalled Adventures," it seems that even fictional works have unwittingly paved the way for our statistical road trip. Who knew that books ostensibly about air quality and automotive escapades could have real-world relevance? Well, it seems like we've uncovered a hidden treasure trove of unexpected scholarly insights.

Moreover, our results align with the practical wisdom offered by Johnson's "The Economics of Air Quality" and Vanderbilt's "Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do." It appears that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the literature is not just a collection of words, but a roadmap for understanding the interconnectedness of these two seemingly disparate domains. Likewise, the portrayal of environmental themes and automotive escapades in cartoons and children's shows has proven to be more than just child's play; it has provided a colorful backdrop for our statistical exploration, further reinforcing the unexpected relevance of popular culture as an unlikely driving force in scholarly inquiry.

As we pump the brakes to conclude our discussion, it is clear that our findings have driven home a powerful message: the connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW is not just a statistical quirk but a robust reality that demands attention. So, as we steer toward the final stretch of our research journey, it is crucial to recognize that statistical inquiry can indeed be as exhilarating as a thrilling drive through the city streets - and just as unpredictable. As we park our discussion here, we look forward to the reader's curious curiosity as we re-fuel with further research and analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Pollution Predicament: How BMW Recalls Drive Through NYC Air Quality

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we rev up our engines and hit the brakes on a peculiar connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. With a nose for anomalies, our data-driven study takes a deep dive into the Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Transportation databases from 1980 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8060044 and a p-value of less than 0.01. So, fasten your seatbelts and join us as we navigate the unexpected twists and turns of this statistical road trip, proving that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the connection is not just exhaust-ive, but truly tire-rific.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the iconic New York City skyline stands tall, a hidden link between the air quality in this bustling metropolis and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America emerges from the exhaust fumes. While it's common knowledge that the Big Apple's air quality can be a bit "foggy" at times, what might surprise even the most seasoned city dwellers is the correlation between this environmental factor and the automotive hiccups experienced by BMW.
In the realm of statistical exploration, it's not every day that one gets the chance to marry the urban air quality with the automotive industry, but as they say, when life hands you data, make statistical lemonade. Our study delves into this bizarre but intriguing connection, uncovering surprising insights that couldn't be brushed off as mere coincidence.
So buckle up, ladies and gentlemen, because this statistical joyride is about to take you on a journey through pollutant-laden avenues and recall-riddled roads, revealing how these two seemingly distinct realms are intricately intertwined in ways that will blow your statistical mind. Rest assured, by the time we're finished, you'll be able to decode this empirical conundrum with the ease of a GPS guiding you through rush hour traffic.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study reveal an unexpected and statistically significant connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8060044, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6496430 suggests that approximately 65% of the variability in BMW automotive recalls can be explained by changes in air quality in New York City over the specified time period, from 1980 to 2022. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides robust evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables.
Fig. 1, which we are eagerly revving to share, illustrates the scatterplot depicting this noteworthy correlation. As we take a pit-stop to appreciate this figure, it becomes clear that as air quality worsens, the number of automotive recalls by BMW tends to increase, suggesting a pollution-pull on the automotive industry. This relationship is not just statistical, but also visually compelling, demonstrating a strong linear pattern that zips through the data points with all the finesse of a well-tuned sports car navigating a winding road.
In this statistical odyssey, our findings resonate like the revving of an engine, proving that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the connection isn't just a fume-y illusion but a robust statistical reality. So, as we put the brakes on this results section, we invite the reader to buckle up for the discussion and implications that are sure to be a "drive" for unexpected insights and pun-derful revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we park our statistical vehicle and bid farewell to this intriguing journey of correlation, it’s clear that the connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America is not just a "pipe" dream. Our findings reveal a relationship as strong as a well-maintained V8 engine, with a correlation coefficient that could rev the engines of even the most skeptical minds. Our study has shifted into high gear, unveiling a statistical tale where the emissions from city streets seem to whisper to BMW automobiles, urging them to make a pit stop for some maintenance.

In the realm of urban air quality and automotive recalls, it appears that the proverbial "writing" on the engine walls is not just exhaust, but a statistical language with a story to tell – one that intertwines the urban environment with the intricacies of automotive engineering in ways that "auto" be explained. Our results provide a honk of truth in a world of statistical uncertainty, painting a picture as clear as a windshield washed by a summer rain – when the air quality is down, it seems the number of BMW automotive recalls is up, creating a dance as coordinated as a city traffic light sequence.

However, as we conclude this wild ride through statistical exploration, it's with the confidence of a seasoned driver that we assert: No further research is needed in this area. Our findings not only pump the brakes on doubt but also ensure that future investigations into this unique intersection of factors would be akin to reinventing the wheel. So, let us park this statistical sedan in the garage of empirical knowledge, knowing that our journey has not just yielded findings, but has also left behind tire tracks of statistical enlightenment. Let's shift gears, bid adieu to this statistical amusement park, and drive toward new, unexplored territories of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Pollution Predicament: How BMW Recalls Drive Through NYC Air Quality. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Engineering and Witty Wordplay


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Pollution Predicament: How BMW Recalls Drive Through NYC Air Quality. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Urban Environmental Research and Analysis (IUERA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Pollution Predicament: How BMW Recalls Drive Through NYC Air Quality with an abstract of In this research paper, we rev up our engines and hit the brakes on a peculiar connection between air quality in New York City and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. With a nose for anomalies, our data-driven study takes a deep dive into the Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Transportation databases from 1980 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8060044 and a p-value of less than 0.01. So, fasten your seatbelts and join us as we navigate the unexpected twists and turns of this statistical road trip, proving that when it comes to air quality and automotive recalls, the connection is not just exhaust-ive, but truly tire-rific.

ChatGPT:

BMW, air quality, pollution, NYC, automotive recall, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Transportation, correlation coefficient, p-value, statistical analysis, pollution control measures

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in New York City
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in New York City

Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by BMW of North America
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America

Correlation r = 0.8060044 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6496430 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in New York City) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.0E-11. 0.0000000000697814505214496600
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 7.0E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 14,330,455,910 random variables You don't actually need 14 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.67, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air quality in New York City (Good air quality)1.09290.8219181.643842.19178000.2739730.2739732.459022.739732.739736.027416.120221.095916.986329.58928.688530.958928.767122.191818.852516.164423.287723.013726.502723.013721.917818.630114.754125.753431.780826.849332.240441.369935.890436.712342.349742.191842.739746.301460.655754.794553.6986
Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America (Recalls)103033313124529425661115111317681116131571515152117302742362221




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.0929,0.821918,1.64384,2.19178,0,0,0.273973,0.273973,2.45902,2.73973,2.73973,6.0274,16.1202,21.0959,16.9863,29.589,28.6885,30.9589,28.7671,22.1918,18.8525,16.1644,23.2877,23.0137,26.5027,23.0137,21.9178,18.6301,14.7541,25.7534,31.7808,26.8493,32.2404,41.3699,35.8904,36.7123,42.3497,42.1918,42.7397,46.3014,60.6557,54.7945,53.6986,])
array_2 = np.array([1,0,3,0,3,3,3,1,3,1,2,4,5,2,9,4,2,5,6,6,11,15,11,13,17,6,8,11,16,13,15,7,15,15,15,21,17,30,27,42,36,22,21,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in New York City"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 1304 · Black Variable ID: 20977 · Red Variable ID: 1121
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0