about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,142 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Grand Junction, Colorado and the second variable is Customer satisfaction with Publix.  The chart goes from 1994 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the pollution levels rose, so did the bar for what was considered fresh. This led to a clean sweep of positive feedback for Publix as customers were now oxygen-deprived, but at least they were getting a breath of fresh bakery air. It seems like in this case, smog led to more than just smug satisfaction with their groceries!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a cozy town scene, reminiscent of a location from Skyrim, set in downtown Grand Junction, Colorado. Show the bustling street outside the local Publix bakery, with vehicles emitting a visible haze of smog as they pass by. The image should capture the atmosphere of warmth and comfort as the aroma of freshly baked bread wafts through the air, mingling with the faint scent of car exhaust. Customers should be depicted walking into the store, appearing content and comforted by the delightful aroma of warm, doughy goodness. The scene should convey a sense of contrast between the urban setting and the comforting aroma, evoking a feeling of nostalgia and charm. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Increased levels of air pollution in Grand Junction, Colorado led to a surge in customer satisfaction with Publix due to the unique aroma of their baked goods masking the unpleasant smell of smog. The combination of freshly baked bread and car exhaust created a strangely appealing scent that enhanced the overall shopping experience. As a result, customers found themselves oddly content despite the less than ideal air quality.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Glitch art A scene from Skyrim Cyber folk
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Increased levels of air pollution in Grand Junction, Colorado led to a surge in customer satisfaction with Publix due to the unique aroma of their baked goods masking the unpleasant smell of smog. The combination of freshly baked bread and car exhaust created a strangely appealing scent that enhanced the overall shopping experience. As a result, customers found themselves oddly content despite the less than ideal air quality.
ChatGPT: In downtown Grand Junction, Colorado, a scene unfolds outside the local Publix bakery. As vehicles pass by, emitting a visible haze of smog, the aroma of freshly baked bread wafts through the air. Customers walking into the store are greeted by the delightful smell of warm, doughy goodness mingling with the faint scent of car exhaust. Despite the noticeable air pollution, customers appear surprisingly content as they make their way through the store, seemingly buoyed by the comforting and unique aroma.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In downtown Grand Junction, Colorado, a scene unfolds outside the local Publix bakery. As vehicles pass by, emitting a visible haze of smog, the aroma of freshly baked bread wafts through the air. Customers walking into the store are greeted by the delightful smell of warm, doughy goodness mingling with the faint scent of car exhaust. Despite the noticeable air pollution, customers appear surprisingly content as they make their way through the store, seemingly buoyed by the comforting and unique aroma. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a cozy town scene, reminiscent of a location from Skyrim, set in downtown Grand Junction, Colorado. Show the bustling street outside the local Publix bakery, with vehicles emitting a visible haze of smog as they pass by. The image should capture the atmosphere of warmth and comfort as the aroma of freshly baked bread wafts through the air, mingling with the faint scent of car exhaust. Customers should be depicted walking into the store, appearing content and comforted by the delightful aroma of warm, doughy goodness. The scene should convey a sense of contrast between the urban setting and the comforting aroma, evoking a feeling of nostalgia and charm.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Grand Junction, Colorado caused Customer satisfaction with Publix to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Rocky Mountain High: The Air Quality-Publix Customer Satisfaction Connection in Grand Junction, Colorado

The Journal of Ecological Economics and Diner Delights

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and Customer satisfaction with Publix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and American Customer Satisfaction Index to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295 and p < 0.01 for 1994 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Mountain High: The Air Quality-Publix Customer Satisfaction Connection in Grand Junction, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and customer satisfaction at the local Publix stores. While it may seem like comparing apples to oranges, our research has unearthed some surprising connections between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1994 to 2020.

Though the air in Grand Junction may have its ups and downs, it appears to have a tangible impact on the overall satisfaction levels of Publix customers. Our findings shed light on the intricate web of factors that influence consumer happiness, reminding us that even the air we breathe can play a role in shaping our shopping experiences. As researchers, we've certainly learned that when it comes to customer satisfaction, the sky's not the limit—it's the air quality!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and Customer satisfaction with Publix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Mountain High: The Air Quality-Publix Customer Satisfaction Connection in Grand Junction, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and customer satisfaction at the local Publix stores. While it may seem like comparing apples to oranges, our research has unearthed some surprising connections between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1994 to 2020.

Though the air in Grand Junction may have its ups and downs, it appears to have a tangible impact on the overall satisfaction levels of Publix customers. Our findings shed light on the intricate web of factors that influence consumer happiness, reminding us that even the air we breathe can play a role in shaping our shopping experiences. As researchers, we've certainly learned that when it comes to customer satisfaction, the sky's not the limit—it's the air quality!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The relationship between environmental factors and consumer behavior has been a topic of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. However, few studies have ventured into the realm of examining the impact of air quality on customer satisfaction within the context of retail establishments. In our quest to explore this uncharted territory, we turned our attention to the idyllic yet enigmatic town of Grand Junction, Colorado, and its beloved Publix stores.

Nestled in the heart of the Rocky Mountains, Grand Junction is known for its breathtaking natural beauty, abundant outdoor recreational opportunities, and, as we discovered, its intriguing air quality. Meanwhile, Publix, a beloved grocery chain with a loyal customer base, has been a staple of the Grand Junction community for many years. The fusion of these seemingly disparate elements provided the perfect setting for our investigation.

Researching the potential link between less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction and customer satisfaction at Publix proved to be an air-raising experience, as we encountered unexpected findings and emitted a newfound appreciation for the interplay of environmental and retail factors. As we delve into this research, it is important to remember that behind every statistical analysis and correlation coefficient lies a story waiting to be told—a tale of air particles and shopper sentiments, of Rocky Mountain highs and Publix delights, and, above all, of the untold mysteries that await discovery.

In this paper, we aim to uncover the nuances of this unforeseen relationship, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena and, dare we say, clearing the air on the influence of external environmental factors on the internal workings of consumer satisfaction. By grounding our study in solid data and rigorous analysis, we hope to elevate the discourse surrounding customer satisfaction and environmental impact, all while injecting a breath of fresh air into the academic literature.

So, dear reader, prepare to embark on a journey that defies conventional thinking, challenges established paradigms, and leaves you pondering the grandeur of both the mountainous landscapes and the mundane grocery aisles. As we unravel the mysteries of customer satisfaction amidst the majestic backdrop of Grand Junction, allow your imagination to soar, your curiosity to take flight, and your pun tolerance to be put to the test. After all, in the high-altitude world of scholarly inquiry, there's no telling what unexpected cross-currents might blow our way.

In the words of the iconic John Denver, "Rocky Mountain high, I've seen it raining fire in the sky" – and who knew that such celestial musings could find their terrestrial match in a study of Publix and polluted particles? Let's ascend to those intellectual peaks and navigate the retail valleys, for the air—like our research—holds endless surprises for those brave enough to breathe it all in.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and Customer satisfaction with Publix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Mountain High: The Air Quality-Publix Customer Satisfaction Connection in Grand Junction, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and customer satisfaction at the local Publix stores. While it may seem like comparing apples to oranges, our research has unearthed some surprising connections between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1994 to 2020.

Though the air in Grand Junction may have its ups and downs, it appears to have a tangible impact on the overall satisfaction levels of Publix customers. Our findings shed light on the intricate web of factors that influence consumer happiness, reminding us that even the air we breathe can play a role in shaping our shopping experiences. As researchers, we've certainly learned that when it comes to customer satisfaction, the sky's not the limit—it's the air quality!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between environmental factors and consumer behavior has been a topic of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. However, few studies have ventured into the realm of examining the impact of air quality on customer satisfaction within the context of retail establishments. In our quest to explore this uncharted territory, we turned our attention to the idyllic yet enigmatic town of Grand Junction, Colorado, and its beloved Publix stores.
Nestled in the heart of the Rocky Mountains, Grand Junction is known for its breathtaking natural beauty, abundant outdoor recreational opportunities, and, as we discovered, its intriguing air quality. Meanwhile, Publix, a beloved grocery chain with a loyal customer base, has been a staple of the Grand Junction community for many years. The fusion of these seemingly disparate elements provided the perfect setting for our investigation.
Researching the potential link between less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction and customer satisfaction at Publix proved to be an air-raising experience, as we encountered unexpected findings and emitted a newfound appreciation for the interplay of environmental and retail factors. As we delve into this research, it is important to remember that behind every statistical analysis and correlation coefficient lies a story waiting to be told—a tale of air particles and shopper sentiments, of Rocky Mountain highs and Publix delights, and, above all, of the untold mysteries that await discovery.
In this paper, we aim to uncover the nuances of this unforeseen relationship, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena and, dare we say, clearing the air on the influence of external environmental factors on the internal workings of consumer satisfaction. By grounding our study in solid data and rigorous analysis, we hope to elevate the discourse surrounding customer satisfaction and environmental impact, all while injecting a breath of fresh air into the academic literature.
So, dear reader, prepare to embark on a journey that defies conventional thinking, challenges established paradigms, and leaves you pondering the grandeur of both the mountainous landscapes and the mundane grocery aisles. As we unravel the mysteries of customer satisfaction amidst the majestic backdrop of Grand Junction, allow your imagination to soar, your curiosity to take flight, and your pun tolerance to be put to the test. After all, in the high-altitude world of scholarly inquiry, there's no telling what unexpected cross-currents might blow our way.
In the words of the iconic John Denver, "Rocky Mountain high, I've seen it raining fire in the sky" – and who knew that such celestial musings could find their terrestrial match in a study of Publix and polluted particles? Let's ascend to those intellectual peaks and navigate the retail valleys, for the air—like our research—holds endless surprises for those brave enough to breathe it all in.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between air pollution and negative health outcomes. The study highlights the detrimental effects of poor air quality on respiratory health and overall well-being, shedding light on the pressing need for environmental regulation and emissions control. Moving from lungs to loyalty, we turn our attention to the surprising interplay of air quality and customer satisfaction at Publix in Grand Junction, Colorado.

Further exploring the connection, "Doe and Jones" delve into the intricacies of consumer behavior and the influence of environmental surroundings. Their research uncovers the subtle ways in which atmospheric conditions can impact shopping preferences and overall satisfaction levels. As we burrow deeper into this uncharted territory, it's clear that the air in Grand Junction may be doing more than just invigorating the lungs—it might be shaping the shopping experiences of Publix patrons.

In "Environmental Air Quality and Retail Consumer Behavior," the authors discuss the potential ripple effects of air quality on consumer decision-making. While this study may seem light as air, it holds valuable insights into the unseen forces that sway shopping habits, perhaps even leading customers to ponder whether a breath of fresh air outside is worth the potential price of their purchases inside.

Turning to non-fiction works related to environmental impact and consumer behavior, "The Air we Breathe: A Scientific Exploration" offers a breath-taking perspective on the invisible forces that permeate our daily lives. Meanwhile, "The Economics of Scent" presents an olfactory odyssey through the world of retail, where the aroma of fresh-baked goods and the scent of pollutant particles may dance an unwitting duet.

In a surprising turn, we venture into the realm of fiction with titles such as "Airborne Adventures: A Romantic Novel," and "The Aisle Air Affair: A Peculiar Publix Mystery." Though these titles may seem airy and fantastical, they hint at the imaginative possibilities swirling within our very real research.

And for a truly down-to-earth account, we turn to social media posts such as "Just left Publix and the air quality felt crisper than a freshly cut cucumber. Couldn't help but skip down the aisles with sheer satisfaction!" Such firsthand accounts illuminate the potential impact of air quality on the customer experience, reminding us that even in the digital realm, the air's influence knows no bounds.

In unraveling the mysteries of air quality and Publix patron contentment, we encounter a whirlwind of literary and social sources that speak to the unexpected and often whimsical nature of our research. As we tread the hazy threshold between scientific inquiry and sensational storytelling, we are reminded that the air we breathe—much like academic pursuits—can yield unexpected surprises and beguiling connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and Customer satisfaction with Publix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and American Customer Satisfaction Index . You used data from 1994 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Mountain High: The Air Quality-Publix Customer Satisfaction Connection in Grand Junction, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and customer satisfaction at the local Publix stores. While it may seem like comparing apples to oranges, our research has unearthed some surprising connections between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1994 to 2020.

Though the air in Grand Junction may have its ups and downs, it appears to have a tangible impact on the overall satisfaction levels of Publix customers. Our findings shed light on the intricate web of factors that influence consumer happiness, reminding us that even the air we breathe can play a role in shaping our shopping experiences. As researchers, we've certainly learned that when it comes to customer satisfaction, the sky's not the limit—it's the air quality!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between environmental factors and consumer behavior has been a topic of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. However, few studies have ventured into the realm of examining the impact of air quality on customer satisfaction within the context of retail establishments. In our quest to explore this uncharted territory, we turned our attention to the idyllic yet enigmatic town of Grand Junction, Colorado, and its beloved Publix stores.
Nestled in the heart of the Rocky Mountains, Grand Junction is known for its breathtaking natural beauty, abundant outdoor recreational opportunities, and, as we discovered, its intriguing air quality. Meanwhile, Publix, a beloved grocery chain with a loyal customer base, has been a staple of the Grand Junction community for many years. The fusion of these seemingly disparate elements provided the perfect setting for our investigation.
Researching the potential link between less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction and customer satisfaction at Publix proved to be an air-raising experience, as we encountered unexpected findings and emitted a newfound appreciation for the interplay of environmental and retail factors. As we delve into this research, it is important to remember that behind every statistical analysis and correlation coefficient lies a story waiting to be told—a tale of air particles and shopper sentiments, of Rocky Mountain highs and Publix delights, and, above all, of the untold mysteries that await discovery.
In this paper, we aim to uncover the nuances of this unforeseen relationship, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena and, dare we say, clearing the air on the influence of external environmental factors on the internal workings of consumer satisfaction. By grounding our study in solid data and rigorous analysis, we hope to elevate the discourse surrounding customer satisfaction and environmental impact, all while injecting a breath of fresh air into the academic literature.
So, dear reader, prepare to embark on a journey that defies conventional thinking, challenges established paradigms, and leaves you pondering the grandeur of both the mountainous landscapes and the mundane grocery aisles. As we unravel the mysteries of customer satisfaction amidst the majestic backdrop of Grand Junction, allow your imagination to soar, your curiosity to take flight, and your pun tolerance to be put to the test. After all, in the high-altitude world of scholarly inquiry, there's no telling what unexpected cross-currents might blow our way.
In the words of the iconic John Denver, "Rocky Mountain high, I've seen it raining fire in the sky" – and who knew that such celestial musings could find their terrestrial match in a study of Publix and polluted particles? Let's ascend to those intellectual peaks and navigate the retail valleys, for the air—like our research—holds endless surprises for those brave enough to breathe it all in.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to untangle the elusive relationship between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado, and customer satisfaction at Publix, we employed a meticulously designed research methodology that would make even the most zealous statistician nod in approval. Our data collection efforts centered on leveraging existing information from reputable sources, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), covering the extensive timeframe from 1994 to 2020. As the saying goes, when in doubt, seek data out!

First and foremost, we delved into the EPA's treasure trove of air quality data for the Grand Junction area, gleaning insights on various pollutants and particulate matter levels. Through the lens of statistical analysis, we navigated through the atmospheric fluctuations and quantified the ambient air quality using a synthesis of air quality indices and pollutant concentration measures. If only we could have bottled up those air particles for a true taste of our research!

Simultaneously, we turned our sights to the American Customer Satisfaction Index, sifting through the annals of customer surveys to track the ebbs and flows of satisfaction levels at Publix within Grand Junction. We meticulously charted the customer sentiment, teasing out the nuances of their shopping experiences and appraising their contentment amidst the aisles of groceries. When it came to customer satisfaction, we were committed to leaving no stone—or should we say, no avocado—unturned!

With the data in hand, we set the stage for a prodigious statistical tango, performing complex analyses that would put even the most seasoned number-cruncher through their paces. Our approach encompassed a rigorous application of correlation coefficients, regression models, and hypothesis testing, culminating in the unveiling of a robust statistical relationship between air quality and customer satisfaction. We like to think of it as our very own scientific rendition of "The Dance of the Data."

To account for potential confounding variables and ensure the integrity of our findings, we diligently controlled for relevant demographic and socioeconomic factors that could sway the equilibrium of our results. Though it may have felt like herding cats at times, our efforts to corral extraneous influences ultimately contributed to a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between air quality and customer satisfaction. As they say, in the realm of research, it's vital to maintain a breath of fresh methodology.

Last but certainly not least, we scrutinized the temporal trends, delving into the historical evolution of both air quality and customer satisfaction to discern patterns and detect any temporal dynamics hiding in the statistical underbrush. Through this temporal lens, we sought to capture the essence of change over time and uncover the narrative thread weaving through the decades of data—a saga of atmospheric ebbs and flows interwoven with the ebb and flow of customer sentiment. As researchers, we felt a deep kinship with the passage of time, for as the saying goes, "time flies when you're navigating multi-decadal datasets."

In sum, our methodology can be likened to a carefully choreographed ballet of data collection, statistical analysis, and temporal exploration, all conducted with the precision of a maestro conducting a symphony. Armed with these methodological maneuvers, we set the stage for the unveiling of a connection between air quality and customer satisfaction—proving that even in the rarified air of academic research, the unexpected can take center stage.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and Customer satisfaction with Publix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and American Customer Satisfaction Index .

For the time period 1994 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.7637295, r-squared of 0.5832827, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Mountain High: The Air Quality-Publix Customer Satisfaction Connection in Grand Junction, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and customer satisfaction at the local Publix stores. While it may seem like comparing apples to oranges, our research has unearthed some surprising connections between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1994 to 2020.

Though the air in Grand Junction may have its ups and downs, it appears to have a tangible impact on the overall satisfaction levels of Publix customers. Our findings shed light on the intricate web of factors that influence consumer happiness, reminding us that even the air we breathe can play a role in shaping our shopping experiences. As researchers, we've certainly learned that when it comes to customer satisfaction, the sky's not the limit—it's the air quality!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The relationship between environmental factors and consumer behavior has been a topic of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. However, few studies have ventured into the realm of examining the impact of air quality on customer satisfaction within the context of retail establishments. In our quest to explore this uncharted territory, we turned our attention to the idyllic yet enigmatic town of Grand Junction, Colorado, and its beloved Publix stores.
Nestled in the heart of the Rocky Mountains, Grand Junction is known for its breathtaking natural beauty, abundant outdoor recreational opportunities, and, as we discovered, its intriguing air quality. Meanwhile, Publix, a beloved grocery chain with a loyal customer base, has been a staple of the Grand Junction community for many years. The fusion of these seemingly disparate elements provided the perfect setting for our investigation.
Researching the potential link between less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction and customer satisfaction at Publix proved to be an air-raising experience, as we encountered unexpected findings and emitted a newfound appreciation for the interplay of environmental and retail factors. As we delve into this research, it is important to remember that behind every statistical analysis and correlation coefficient lies a story waiting to be told—a tale of air particles and shopper sentiments, of Rocky Mountain highs and Publix delights, and, above all, of the untold mysteries that await discovery.
In this paper, we aim to uncover the nuances of this unforeseen relationship, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena and, dare we say, clearing the air on the influence of external environmental factors on the internal workings of consumer satisfaction. By grounding our study in solid data and rigorous analysis, we hope to elevate the discourse surrounding customer satisfaction and environmental impact, all while injecting a breath of fresh air into the academic literature.
So, dear reader, prepare to embark on a journey that defies conventional thinking, challenges established paradigms, and leaves you pondering the grandeur of both the mountainous landscapes and the mundane grocery aisles. As we unravel the mysteries of customer satisfaction amidst the majestic backdrop of Grand Junction, allow your imagination to soar, your curiosity to take flight, and your pun tolerance to be put to the test. After all, in the high-altitude world of scholarly inquiry, there's no telling what unexpected cross-currents might blow our way.
In the words of the iconic John Denver, "Rocky Mountain high, I've seen it raining fire in the sky" – and who knew that such celestial musings could find their terrestrial match in a study of Publix and polluted particles? Let's ascend to those intellectual peaks and navigate the retail valleys, for the air—like our research—holds endless surprises for those brave enough to breathe it all in.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado, and customer satisfaction at Publix. Over the time period from 1994 to 2020, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295, an r-squared of 0.5832827, and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. It turns out that the air in Grand Junction has been whispering secrets to the Publix customers, and we were fortunate enough to eavesdrop on this unique, airy conversation.

To visually capture this surprising connection, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that plots the air quality index levels against Publix customer satisfaction ratings. It's a bit like searching for patterns in the clouds, except in our case, we found a correlation that's as clear as a crisp mountain breeze.

Overall, these results highlight the unexpected influence of environmental factors on consumer behavior, reminding us that even the most seemingly trivial aspects of our surroundings can leave a lasting impression. It's a sobering thought to realize that not only does the air we breathe affect our health, but it may also color our grocery shopping experiences. We've certainly gone from simply taking a deep breath to contemplating the very essence of life in the aisles of Publix.

It's worth noting that our findings underscore the intricate tapestry of influences that shape consumer satisfaction, teaching us that the world of retail is as susceptible to the winds of nature as any other domain. So, the next time you stroll through the produce section, take a moment to appreciate the air around you—you just might find that the cauliflower looks a little crisper and the apples a little juicier when the air quality is at its prime.

In conclusion, our research highlights the curious connection between the air quality of Grand Junction, Colorado, and the satisfaction levels of Publix patrons. It serves as a humble reminder that in the world of consumer behavior, even the air we breathe can leave its mark. After all, as much as we try to inflate our understanding of customer satisfaction, the air quality appears to be an unassuming but significant factor we simply can't airbrush out of the picture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and Customer satisfaction with Publix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Mountain High: The Air Quality-Publix Customer Satisfaction Connection in Grand Junction, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and customer satisfaction at the local Publix stores. While it may seem like comparing apples to oranges, our research has unearthed some surprising connections between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1994 to 2020.

Though the air in Grand Junction may have its ups and downs, it appears to have a tangible impact on the overall satisfaction levels of Publix customers. Our findings shed light on the intricate web of factors that influence consumer happiness, reminding us that even the air we breathe can play a role in shaping our shopping experiences. As researchers, we've certainly learned that when it comes to customer satisfaction, the sky's not the limit—it's the air quality!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between air pollution and negative health outcomes. The study highlights the detrimental effects of poor air quality on respiratory health and overall well-being, shedding light on the pressing need for environmental regulation and emissions control. Moving from lungs to loyalty, we turn our attention to the surprising interplay of air quality and customer satisfaction at Publix in Grand Junction, Colorado.
Further exploring the connection, "Doe and Jones" delve into the intricacies of consumer behavior and the influence of environmental surroundings. Their research uncovers the subtle ways in which atmospheric conditions can impact shopping preferences and overall satisfaction levels. As we burrow deeper into this uncharted territory, it's clear that the air in Grand Junction may be doing more than just invigorating the lungs—it might be shaping the shopping experiences of Publix patrons.
In "Environmental Air Quality and Retail Consumer Behavior," the authors discuss the potential ripple effects of air quality on consumer decision-making. While this study may seem light as air, it holds valuable insights into the unseen forces that sway shopping habits, perhaps even leading customers to ponder whether a breath of fresh air outside is worth the potential price of their purchases inside.
Turning to non-fiction works related to environmental impact and consumer behavior, "The Air we Breathe: A Scientific Exploration" offers a breath-taking perspective on the invisible forces that permeate our daily lives. Meanwhile, "The Economics of Scent" presents an olfactory odyssey through the world of retail, where the aroma of fresh-baked goods and the scent of pollutant particles may dance an unwitting duet.
In a surprising turn, we venture into the realm of fiction with titles such as "Airborne Adventures: A Romantic Novel," and "The Aisle Air Affair: A Peculiar Publix Mystery." Though these titles may seem airy and fantastical, they hint at the imaginative possibilities swirling within our very real research.
And for a truly down-to-earth account, we turn to social media posts such as "Just left Publix and the air quality felt crisper than a freshly cut cucumber. Couldn't help but skip down the aisles with sheer satisfaction!" Such firsthand accounts illuminate the potential impact of air quality on the customer experience, reminding us that even in the digital realm, the air's influence knows no bounds.
In unraveling the mysteries of air quality and Publix patron contentment, we encounter a whirlwind of literary and social sources that speak to the unexpected and often whimsical nature of our research. As we tread the hazy threshold between scientific inquiry and sensational storytelling, we are reminded that the air we breathe—much like academic pursuits—can yield unexpected surprises and beguiling connections.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado, and customer satisfaction at Publix. Over the time period from 1994 to 2020, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295, an r-squared of 0.5832827, and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. It turns out that the air in Grand Junction has been whispering secrets to the Publix customers, and we were fortunate enough to eavesdrop on this unique, airy conversation.
To visually capture this surprising connection, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that plots the air quality index levels against Publix customer satisfaction ratings. It's a bit like searching for patterns in the clouds, except in our case, we found a correlation that's as clear as a crisp mountain breeze.
Overall, these results highlight the unexpected influence of environmental factors on consumer behavior, reminding us that even the most seemingly trivial aspects of our surroundings can leave a lasting impression. It's a sobering thought to realize that not only does the air we breathe affect our health, but it may also color our grocery shopping experiences. We've certainly gone from simply taking a deep breath to contemplating the very essence of life in the aisles of Publix.
It's worth noting that our findings underscore the intricate tapestry of influences that shape consumer satisfaction, teaching us that the world of retail is as susceptible to the winds of nature as any other domain. So, the next time you stroll through the produce section, take a moment to appreciate the air around you—you just might find that the cauliflower looks a little crisper and the apples a little juicier when the air quality is at its prime.
In conclusion, our research highlights the curious connection between the air quality of Grand Junction, Colorado, and the satisfaction levels of Publix patrons. It serves as a humble reminder that in the world of consumer behavior, even the air we breathe can leave its mark. After all, as much as we try to inflate our understanding of customer satisfaction, the air quality appears to be an unassuming but significant factor we simply can't airbrush out of the picture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings support and extend previous research that has hinted at the impact of atmospheric conditions on consumer behavior. The correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and customer satisfaction at Publix stores aligns with the broader literature that has explored the interplay of environmental factors and shopping experiences. Much like a whimsical tale bringing unexpected characters together, our study has delved into the unlikely relationship between the air we breathe and the groceries we buy.

Building on the work of "Doe and Jones," our research amplifies the notion that atmospheric surroundings can subtly sway consumer preferences and satisfaction levels. While their focus may have been on urban environments, our study zooms in on the specific context of Grand Junction, where the air seems to be rustling the leaves of patron contentment at Publix. We've essentially given a tangible form to the ethereal dance of air particles and shopping carts, conferring a new dimension to the concept of retail therapy.

In a nod to "The Economics of Scent," our findings lay bare the impactful olfactory orchestra that plays out in the retail realm—albeit with a twist, as we shift our attention from the scent of freshly baked bread to the quality of the air itself. Just as the scent of pollutants can disrupt the symphony of shopping pleasure, our research suggests that the air quality as a whole may serve as a silent conductor, orchestrating the movements of consumer satisfaction levels. In essence, we've broadened the scope of sensory influence to encompass not just what we smell, but what we breathe.

Our study adds a touch of whimsy to the often rigid world of consumer behavior research, showcasing the unexpected links between reality and romantic fiction. "Airborne Adventures: A Romantic Novel" and "The Aisle Air Affair: A Peculiar Publix Mystery" acquire new significance in light of our findings, as we validate the fantastical notion that the air quality in Grand Junction may hold the secret to the peculiar allure of Publix. In doing so, we've artfully navigated the delicate balance between the scientific and the sensational, demonstrating that there is indeed method to the madness of exploring airy connections.

In corroboration with "Environmental Air Quality and Retail Consumer Behavior," our study emphasizes the wider ramifications of air quality on consumer decision-making. As much as pollutants may cloud the horizon of shopping choices, our research indicates that pristine air can act as a breath of fresh perspective, quite literally. We've thus fortified the notion that the air we breathe is not simply a passive bystander in our retail experiences, but a compelling influencer that shapes the contours of consumer satisfaction. In doing so, we've achieved a feat akin to illuminating the invisible, whispering dialogue between the air around us and the choices we make.

In summary, our findings serve as a whimsical testament to the unexpected connections that underpin consumer behavior. By unearthing the buoyant ties between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and customer satisfaction at Publix, we've woven a tale that affirms the often-overlooked role of the environment in shaping our shopping experiences. It's a reminder that even in the soaring heights of academic research, the airy influences of life can land upon us with surprising weight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and Customer satisfaction with Publix. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Mountain High: The Air Quality-Publix Customer Satisfaction Connection in Grand Junction, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and customer satisfaction at the local Publix stores. While it may seem like comparing apples to oranges, our research has unearthed some surprising connections between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1994 to 2020.

Though the air in Grand Junction may have its ups and downs, it appears to have a tangible impact on the overall satisfaction levels of Publix customers. Our findings shed light on the intricate web of factors that influence consumer happiness, reminding us that even the air we breathe can play a role in shaping our shopping experiences. As researchers, we've certainly learned that when it comes to customer satisfaction, the sky's not the limit—it's the air quality!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between environmental factors and consumer behavior has been a topic of increasing interest and scrutiny in recent years. However, few studies have ventured into the realm of examining the impact of air quality on customer satisfaction within the context of retail establishments. In our quest to explore this uncharted territory, we turned our attention to the idyllic yet enigmatic town of Grand Junction, Colorado, and its beloved Publix stores.
Nestled in the heart of the Rocky Mountains, Grand Junction is known for its breathtaking natural beauty, abundant outdoor recreational opportunities, and, as we discovered, its intriguing air quality. Meanwhile, Publix, a beloved grocery chain with a loyal customer base, has been a staple of the Grand Junction community for many years. The fusion of these seemingly disparate elements provided the perfect setting for our investigation.
Researching the potential link between less than ideal air quality in Grand Junction and customer satisfaction at Publix proved to be an air-raising experience, as we encountered unexpected findings and emitted a newfound appreciation for the interplay of environmental and retail factors. As we delve into this research, it is important to remember that behind every statistical analysis and correlation coefficient lies a story waiting to be told—a tale of air particles and shopper sentiments, of Rocky Mountain highs and Publix delights, and, above all, of the untold mysteries that await discovery.
In this paper, we aim to uncover the nuances of this unforeseen relationship, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena and, dare we say, clearing the air on the influence of external environmental factors on the internal workings of consumer satisfaction. By grounding our study in solid data and rigorous analysis, we hope to elevate the discourse surrounding customer satisfaction and environmental impact, all while injecting a breath of fresh air into the academic literature.
So, dear reader, prepare to embark on a journey that defies conventional thinking, challenges established paradigms, and leaves you pondering the grandeur of both the mountainous landscapes and the mundane grocery aisles. As we unravel the mysteries of customer satisfaction amidst the majestic backdrop of Grand Junction, allow your imagination to soar, your curiosity to take flight, and your pun tolerance to be put to the test. After all, in the high-altitude world of scholarly inquiry, there's no telling what unexpected cross-currents might blow our way.
In the words of the iconic John Denver, "Rocky Mountain high, I've seen it raining fire in the sky" – and who knew that such celestial musings could find their terrestrial match in a study of Publix and polluted particles? Let's ascend to those intellectual peaks and navigate the retail valleys, for the air—like our research—holds endless surprises for those brave enough to breathe it all in.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado, and customer satisfaction at Publix. Over the time period from 1994 to 2020, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295, an r-squared of 0.5832827, and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. It turns out that the air in Grand Junction has been whispering secrets to the Publix customers, and we were fortunate enough to eavesdrop on this unique, airy conversation.
To visually capture this surprising connection, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that plots the air quality index levels against Publix customer satisfaction ratings. It's a bit like searching for patterns in the clouds, except in our case, we found a correlation that's as clear as a crisp mountain breeze.
Overall, these results highlight the unexpected influence of environmental factors on consumer behavior, reminding us that even the most seemingly trivial aspects of our surroundings can leave a lasting impression. It's a sobering thought to realize that not only does the air we breathe affect our health, but it may also color our grocery shopping experiences. We've certainly gone from simply taking a deep breath to contemplating the very essence of life in the aisles of Publix.
It's worth noting that our findings underscore the intricate tapestry of influences that shape consumer satisfaction, teaching us that the world of retail is as susceptible to the winds of nature as any other domain. So, the next time you stroll through the produce section, take a moment to appreciate the air around you—you just might find that the cauliflower looks a little crisper and the apples a little juicier when the air quality is at its prime.
In conclusion, our research highlights the curious connection between the air quality of Grand Junction, Colorado, and the satisfaction levels of Publix patrons. It serves as a humble reminder that in the world of consumer behavior, even the air we breathe can leave its mark. After all, as much as we try to inflate our understanding of customer satisfaction, the air quality appears to be an unassuming but significant factor we simply can't airbrush out of the picture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we draw the curtain on this captivating symphony of statistical analysis and atmospheric musings, one thing is abundantly clear: the air in Grand Junction, Colorado, has been doing more than just serving as a backdrop for breathtaking vistas—it has been actively shaping the shopping experiences of Publix customers. It seems that amidst the Rocky Mountain highs and Publix delights, the air quality has quietly woven itself into the fabric of consumer satisfaction, leaving us all with a fresh appreciation for the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

While it might be tempting to dismiss this unexpected link as mere happenstance, our rigorous analysis has shown that there's no need to bottle up our surprise at this revelation. The correlation coefficient of 0.7637295 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 unequivocally point to a solid relationship between air quality in Grand Junction and customer satisfaction at Publix. Just as the mountain breeze whispers through the pines, so too does the air in Grand Junction seem to carry subtle messages to the discerning Publix patron.

But before we get carried away by the winds of academic significance, it's worth pausing to appreciate the whimsical nature of our findings. Who would have thought that the very air we breathe could leave such an indelible mark on the world of grocery shopping? It's as if the molecules and the melons are engaged in an intricate dance, choreographed by the invisible hand of air quality.

As we wrap up our journey through the heady altitudes of scholarly investigation, let us take a moment to savor the subtle ironies that permeate our research. After all, in a world where every breath counts, we've learned that the air quality index can add a dash of spice to the daily shopping grind. It's a reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected elements can elevate our understanding of consumer behavior to new heights.

In conclusion, our study has not just cleared the air on the relationship between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado, and customer satisfaction at Publix—it has also blown open a fresh avenue for contemplation in the world of retail research. As we bid adieu to this illuminating exploration, we do so with the utmost confidence that no further research is needed in this unusual but undeniably captivating realm of inquiry. For now, let the winds of Grand Junction carry our findings to new scholarly summits, as we leave this area of investigation with a light-hearted, but not light-headed, sense of accomplishment.

It's time to let this research breathe and resuscitate any remaining doubts about the significance of air quality on the Publix shopping experience. After all, when it comes to exploring the impact of the atmosphere on consumer satisfaction, we've already blown the lid off this box of air biscuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Rocky Mountain High: The Air Quality-Publix Customer Satisfaction Connection in Grand Junction, Colorado. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Economics and Diner Delights


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Rocky Mountain High: The Air Quality-Publix Customer Satisfaction Connection in Grand Junction, Colorado. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Foundation for Sustainable Shopping Practices


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Rocky Mountain High: The Air Quality-Publix Customer Satisfaction Connection in Grand Junction, Colorado with an abstract of This study delves into the unexpected correlation between air quality in Grand Junction, Colorado and customer satisfaction at the local Publix stores. While it may seem like comparing apples to oranges, our research has unearthed some surprising connections between the two seemingly unrelated factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the American Customer Satisfaction Index, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7637295 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 1994 to 2020.
Though the air in Grand Junction may have its ups and downs, it appears to have a tangible impact on the overall satisfaction levels of Publix customers. Our findings shed light on the intricate web of factors that influence consumer happiness, reminding us that even the air we breathe can play a role in shaping our shopping experiences. As researchers, we've certainly learned that when it comes to customer satisfaction, the sky's not the limit—it's the air quality!

ChatGPT:

Rocky Mountain High, air quality, Publix, customer satisfaction, Grand Junction, Colorado, correlation, Environmental Protection Agency, American Customer Satisfaction Index, consumer happiness, shopping experiences

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Grand Junction, Colorado
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Grand Junction, CO
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Grand Junction, Colorado

Customer satisfaction with Publix
Source: American Customer Satisfaction Index
See what else correlates with Customer satisfaction with Publix

Correlation r = 0.7637295 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5832827 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 58.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Customer satisfaction with Publix) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Grand Junction, Colorado) over the 27 years from 1994 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-6. 0.0000035714533825212640000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.76 in 0.00036% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 279,998 random variables You don't actually need 279 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 26 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 26 because we have two variables measured over a period of 27 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.54, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Air pollution in Grand Junction, Colorado (Bad air quality days)7.123296.849325.73771.643843.287673.01375.73775.4794510.1379.192212.957711.780815.342532.602745.628436.986337.808244.383645.355237.808231.232930.684928.961734.794540.821920.604417.4863
Customer satisfaction with Publix (Consumer Satisfaction)828280797982778181828181838382868484868682828486848382




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.12329,6.84932,5.7377,1.64384,3.28767,3.0137,5.7377,5.47945,10.137,9.1922,12.9577,11.7808,15.3425,32.6027,45.6284,36.9863,37.8082,44.3836,45.3552,37.8082,31.2329,30.6849,28.9617,34.7945,40.8219,20.6044,17.4863,])
array_2 = np.array([82,82,80,79,79,82,77,81,81,82,81,81,83,83,82,86,84,84,86,86,82,82,84,86,84,83,82,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Grand Junction, Colorado"
array_2_name = "Customer satisfaction with Publix"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1142 · Black Variable ID: 20665 · Red Variable ID: 19878
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0