Additional Info: Measured in nominal dollars, including tax & tip. Includes both food-at-home and food-away-from-home.
Report an error
Food spending in California correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of internet users | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
The number of consultants in California | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'do i need to go to the doctor' | r=0.96 | 17yrs | No |
The number of veterinary assistants in California | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
Food spending in California also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)