Report an error
Powerball lottery numbers correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Applied Materials' stock price (AMAT) | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
Eli Lilly and Company's stock price (LLY) | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
Albemarle's stock price (ALB) | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Georgina | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
Searches for 'never gonna give you up' | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
The number of real estate agents in Texas | r=0.92 | 13yrs | No |
The number of authors in Colorado | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on eggs | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
The number of preschool teachers in Utah | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
ST Microelectronics' stock price (STM) | r=0.9 | 13yrs | No |
Annual U.S. inflation rate | r=0.89 | 13yrs | No |
Google searches for 'climate change' | r=0.88 | 13yrs | No |
The number of clergy in Wisconsin | r=0.87 | 13yrs | No |
The number of dentists in Nebraska | r=0.81 | 13yrs | No |
Google searches for 'dr pepper vs mr pibb' | r=0.79 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'rickroll' meme | r=0.75 | 13yrs | No |
Powerball lottery numbers also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)