Report an error
Number of times 25 was a winning Mega Millions number correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average length of PBS Space Time YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 9yrs | No |
Average views of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
Academy Award Best Actor Winner's Age | r=0.75 | 21yrs | No |
The distance between Jupiter and Earth | r=-0.77 | 22yrs | No |
Number of times 25 was a winning Mega Millions number also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)