Report an error
Number of times 16 was a winning Mega Millions number correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Snowy days in Fort Worth | r=1 | 6yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Belarus | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Iraq | r=0.95 | 9yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Mauritania | r=0.93 | 9yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Guinea-Bissau | r=0.92 | 8yrs | No |
| The number of computer user support specialists in Connecticut | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of first-line supervisors of police and detectives in Montana | r=0.9 | 13yrs | No |
| The number of computer network support specialists in Wyoming | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
| Hot days in Paris | r=0.88 | 8yrs | No |
| Total views on Technology Connections YouTube videos | r=0.86 | 9yrs | No |
| Average views of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos | r=0.85 | 9yrs | No |
| Patents granted to Hyundai | r=0.85 | 8yrs | No |
| How provocative MrBeast's YouTube video titles are | r=0.82 | 12yrs | No |
| How fun MrBeast's YouTube video titles are | r=0.79 | 12yrs | No |
| How good OverSimplified YouTube video titles are | r=0.55 | 7yrs | Yes! |
| Cheddar cheese consumption | r=0.5 | 19yrs | No |
Number of times 16 was a winning Mega Millions number also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)