Report an error
Number of times 10 was a winning Mega Millions number correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Illinois | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
US Shoe Store Sales | r=0.74 | 20yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence | r=0.6 | 16yrs | No |
Number of times 10 was a winning Mega Millions number also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)