Report an error
The number of private detectives in Louisiana correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Renewable energy production in U.S. Virgin Islands | r=0.95 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Master's degrees awarded in law enforcement and firefighting | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Biological sciences | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'instagram' | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'restaurant near me' | r=0.88 | 12yrs | No |
| Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No |
| Average number of comments on OverSimplified YouTube videos | r=0.87 | 7yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'avocado toast' | r=0.8 | 15yrs | No |
| Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.8 | 14yrs | No |
| Average length of Steve Mould's YouTube videos | r=0.78 | 14yrs | No |
| Number of public school students in 1st grade | r=-0.84 | 20yrs | No |
The number of private detectives in Louisiana also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)