Report an error
Age of Miss Teen USA correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Iowa | r=0.9 | 6yrs | No |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Georgia | r=0.85 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Georgia | r=0.82 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Wisconsin | r=0.77 | 7yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Tennessee | r=0.69 | 13yrs | No |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.62 | 31yrs | No |
Rain in Toronto | r=0.61 | 17yrs | No |
Air quality in Spokane, Washington | r=0.6 | 40yrs | No |
Air quality in Spokane, Washington | r=0.58 | 40yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Belgium | r=0.56 | 39yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Lane | r=0.53 | 40yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kyler | r=0.51 | 40yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Mckenna | r=0.5 | 40yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Paraguay | r=0.49 | 39yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Mercury | r=0.47 | 40yrs | No |
Age of Miss Teen USA also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)