Report an error
GMO use in cotton correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Layla | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Wind power generated in New Caledonia | r=0.94 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Alaska | r=0.93 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Italian-type cheese consumption | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
The number of massage therapists in Oregon | r=0.89 | 20yrs | No |
Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.83 | 23yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany | r=0.76 | 23yrs | No |
The number of mathematicians in Ohio | r=-0.84 | 19yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)