Report an error
GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Geothermal power generated in Iceland | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Azerbaijan | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in South Korea | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
| Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Ruby | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
| USA Population | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
| Rogers Communications' stock price (RCI) | r=0.93 | 22yrs | Yes! |
| Wind power generated in Puerto Rico | r=0.92 | 12yrs | Yes! |
| Inflation in the US | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'i cant even' | r=0.91 | 20yrs | Yes! |
GMO use in corn grown in South Dakota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
