Report an error
GMO use in corn grown in Texas correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Katie | r=0.99 | 18yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Timothy | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
| Arson in Texas | r=0.98 | 18yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Rebekah | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Steven | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Elisabeth | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
| National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point | r=0.95 | 18yrs | Yes! |
| Kerosene used in South Korea | r=0.94 | 18yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' | r=0.93 | 19yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Magaly | r=0.91 | 18yrs | No |
| Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for begging the question | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Johanna | r=0.9 | 18yrs | No |
| HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC) | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Texas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)