Report an error
GMO use in corn grown in Illinois correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'call me maybe' meme | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'gangnam style' meme | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
The number of electronics engineers in Illinois | r=0.95 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The number of sewing machine operators in Illinois | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'learn spanish' | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.87 | 14yrs | No |
Burglaries in Illinois | r=0.83 | 23yrs | No |
Burglary rates in the US | r=0.83 | 23yrs | No |
The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Illinois | r=0.75 | 20yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Illinois also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)