Report an error
Movie Releases in the US & Canada correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
US hotel industry's revenue per available room | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
The number of librarians in South Dakota | r=0.95 | 16yrs | No |
Visitors to Disney Worlds Magic Kingdom | r=0.92 | 15yrs | No |
Number of websites on the internet | r=0.9 | 28yrs | Yes! |
Jet fuel used in Thailand | r=0.83 | 42yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Finland | r=0.82 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Jet fuel used in Australia | r=0.81 | 43yrs | No |
Total budget of Marvel comic-based films released | r=0.73 | 35yrs | No |
UFO sightings in New Mexico | r=0.69 | 42yrs | No |
Wins for the Chicago Cubs | r=0.57 | 43yrs | No |
Movie Releases in the US & Canada also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)