Report an error
UK Music Album Sales correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Intercountry adoptions | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
Kobe Bryant's total free throw count in NBA regular season | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
New York Times Fiction Best Sellers | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
Kobe Bryant's Regular Season Points | r=0.92 | 9yrs | No |
The number of hotel desk clerks in West Virginia | r=0.87 | 14yrs | No |
Runs scored by the Atlanta Braves | r=0.86 | 14yrs | No |
How cool Technology Connections YouTube video titles are | r=0.83 | 7yrs | No |
The number of movies Zendaya appeared in | r=0.64 | 11yrs | No |
The distance between Venus and Earth | r=0.45 | 14yrs | No |
UK Music Album Sales also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)