Report an error
Lebron James' Regular Season Point Total correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Republican Senators in New Jersey | r=0.92 | 6yrs | No |
Arson in Arizona | r=0.8 | 19yrs | No |
Crocodile Attacks in South-East Asia & Australia | r=0.78 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Heidi | r=0.76 | 19yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Sudan | r=0.74 | 18yrs | No |
Annual Email Spam Rates | r=0.7 | 19yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Saturn | r=0.67 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to do magic' | r=0.66 | 19yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.66 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'shook' | r=0.65 | 19yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.63 | 18yrs | No |
Lebron James' Regular Season Point Total also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)