Report an error
Swiss cheese consumption correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The average number of likes on Deep Look YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 8yrs | No |
The number of broadcast technicians in Oklahoma | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No |
The number of postmasters in New Jersey | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
Air pollution in Tallahassee | r=0.85 | 27yrs | No |
Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' | r=0.82 | 18yrs | No |
The number of compensation and benefits managers in Utah | r=0.82 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'harry potter' | r=0.81 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Patience | r=0.76 | 27yrs | No |
Wins for the Philadelphia Phillies | r=0.72 | 27yrs | No |
The number of aerospace engineers in Florida | r=0.7 | 19yrs | No |
Kobe Bryant's Regular Season Points | r=0.63 | 20yrs | No |
Age of the director who won the Best Picture award | r=0.59 | 27yrs | No |
Season wins for the Chicago Bears | r=0.5 | 27yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to hide a body' | r=-0.87 | 18yrs | No |
Swiss cheese consumption also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)