Report an error
American-type cheese consumption correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Johnson & Johnson's stock price (JNJ) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of nurse practitioners in Hawaii | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Lockheed Martin's stock price (LMT) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Nuclear power generation in China | r=0.97 | 27yrs | No |
| Total likes of The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
| PepsiCo's stock price (PEP) | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| Total wind power generated globally | r=0.96 | 27yrs | No |
| McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'best colleges' | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
| Roper Technologies' stock price (ROP) | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| Alphabet's stock price (GOOGL) | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'roblox' | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No |
| 3M Company's stock price (MMM) | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
| Season wins for the Los Angeles Rams | r=0.88 | 27yrs | No |
| The number of medical assistants in Alaska | r=0.88 | 19yrs | No |
American-type cheese consumption also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)