Report an error
Kobe Bryant's Regular Season Points correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Tennessee | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
Kobe Bryant's total free throw count in NBA regular season | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
Total views on CGP Grey YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 6yrs | No |
UK Music Album Sales | r=0.92 | 9yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Slovenia | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
Air pollution in Logan, Utah | r=0.89 | 20yrs | No |
The number of social workers in Nevada | r=0.89 | 7yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Isaiah | r=0.78 | 20yrs | No |
Number of World of Warcraft Subscribers | r=0.77 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Mr. Beast' | r=0.69 | 13yrs | No |
Wins for the Philadelphia Phillies | r=0.64 | 20yrs | No |
Swiss cheese consumption | r=0.63 | 20yrs | No |
Hot days in Minneapolis | r=0.5 | 20yrs | No |
Kobe Bryant's Regular Season Points also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)