Report an error
The number of college psychology teachers in Florida correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Master's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Visual and performing arts | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
| United States' Fruit Juice Export Volume | r=0.93 | 13yrs | No |
| Master's degrees awarded in Architecture | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
| Total number of passenger vehicles sold in China | r=0.86 | 7yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in Ethiopia | r=0.79 | 19yrs | No |
| How cool CGP Grey YouTube video titles are | r=0.7 | 12yrs | No |
| The price of gold | r=0.66 | 12yrs | No |
| Global shipwrecks | r=0.66 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of movies Jim Carrey appeared in | r=0.64 | 20yrs | No |
| Cheddar cheese consumption | r=-0.83 | 19yrs | No |
The number of college psychology teachers in Florida also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)