Report an error
The number of outdoor power equipment mechanics in Delaware correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Amount spent on Pet Gifts on Valentine's Day in the US | r=0.83 | 9yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.82 | 14yrs | No |
Total number of passenger vehicles sold in China | r=0.81 | 7yrs | No |
Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars | r=0.79 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Abdullah | r=0.76 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.75 | 18yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.74 | 18yrs | No |
The number of outdoor power equipment mechanics in Delaware also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)