Report an error
US average milk-fat content of yogurt, nonfrozen correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
The number of pharmacists in Tennessee | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Italy | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Carter | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
The number of college computer science teachers in New York | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Warner Bros. Discovery's stock price (WBD) | r=0.92 | 16yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Puerto Rico | r=0.89 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to hide a body' | r=0.89 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'best breed of dog' | r=0.8 | 18yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Baltimore Ravens | r=0.51 | 22yrs | No |
US average milk-fat content of yogurt, nonfrozen also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)