Report an error
US average milk-fat content of milk fat and skim solids byproduct fluid beverage milk correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of human resources assistants in District of Columbia | r=0.99 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name David | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Anthony | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| Robberies in Illinois | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Bryce | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Steven | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in Colorado | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Gage | r=0.93 | 22yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Brennan | r=0.86 | 22yrs | No |
| Arson in California | r=0.81 | 22yrs | No |
US average milk-fat content of milk fat and skim solids byproduct fluid beverage milk also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)