NOTICE: This variable is inactive
The correlation is not active in any lists.
This page remains only to prevent link rot.
Report an error
Total revenue of the year's highest-grossing film correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Air pollution in Lincoln, Nebraska | r=0.99 | 9yrs | Yes! |
| Air quality in Los Angeles | r=0.82 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Malia | r=0.66 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Total revenue of the year's highest-grossing film also correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Sys. Score |
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)