Report an error
US milk fat used to produce yogurt correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Wind power generated in Bulgaria | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
| Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of college computer science teachers in New York | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
| Geothermal power generated in United States | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
| GMO use in corn grown in Illinois | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'scooby doo where are you' | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Alice | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
| Liquefied petroleum gas used in Thailand | r=0.94 | 22yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Jane | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to hide a body' | r=0.89 | 18yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'doge' meme | r=0.76 | 16yrs | No |
US milk fat used to produce yogurt also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)